DOCSLIB.ORG

The Popularity of Business Aircraft Has Increased As More Companies Realize the Efficiency and Productivity of This Powerful B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Popularity of Business Aircraft Has Increased As More Companies Realize the Efficiency and Productivity of This Powerful B Appendices Airports Systems Plan Mid-America Regional Council Page 1 Glossary Abbreviations AAF Army Air Field GAAA General Aviation Analysis AGL Above Ground Level Area ADAP Airport Development Aid GCA Ground Control Approach Program GNP Gross National Product AFB Air Force Base GT General Transport Airport AIM Airman's Information GU General Utility Airport Manual HD Heliport Designation ALSF Approach Light System HIRL High Intensity Runway with Flashers Lights ARTCC Air Route Traffic Control IFR Instrument Flight Rules Center* ILS Instrument Landing ARTS Automated Radar Terminal System System* IOC Indirect Operating Costs ASR Airport Surveillance Radar IPC Intermittent Positive ATA Air Transportation Control* Association LBC Localizer Back Course ATC Air Traffic Control Approach ATSAP Air Transportation System LDA Localizer Type Directional Advance Plan Aid BT Basic Transport Airport MALS Medium Intensity BTD Bright Tube Display Approach Light BU Basic Utility Airport MEA Minimum Enroute Altitude* CAB Civil Aeronautics Board MIRL Medium Intensity Runway CBD Central Business District Lights CGAS Coast Guard Air Station MLS Microwave Landing CNR Composite Noise Rating System* CTOL Conventional Takeoff and MSL Mean Sea Level Landing NASAO National Association of DME Distance Measuring State Aviation Officers Equipment* NASP National Airport System DOC Direct Operating Costs Plan DOD U.S. Department of NDB Nondirectional Homing Defense Beacon DOT U.S. Department of NED Noise Exposure Forecast Transportation O&D Origin and Destination EPA Environmental Protection OPP&FM Office of Program Planning Agency and Fiscal Management FAA Federal Aviation PANCAP Practical Annual Capacity* Administration PAR Precision Approach Radar FAR Federal Aviation PHOCAP Practical Hourly Capacity* Regulation PCA Positively Controlled FSS Flight Service Station* Airspace* F&E Facilities and Equipment RBS Radar Beacon System FY Fiscal Year Airports Systems Plan Mid-America Regional Council Page 2 REIL Runway End Identifier Lights RNAV Reduced Takeoff and Landing RTOL Reduced Takeoff and Landing SMSA Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area STOL Short Take Off & Landing TACAN Tactical Air Navigation (military)* TCA Terminal Control Area TRACON Terminal Area Radar Approach Control TVOR Terminal Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range VASI Visual Approach Slope Indicator* VOR Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range VFR Visual Flight Rules VORTAC Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range and Co-Located Military Tactical Air Navigation and Distance Measuring Equipment * Defined in Definitions Airports Systems Plan Mid-America Regional Council Page 55 Definitions Category III ILS ceiling of zero and zero visibility. Air Route Traffic Control Center Certificated Air Carrier Airline (ARTCC) A U.S. company providing A facility established to scheduled passenger and/or provide air traffic control service cargo air service and holding a to aircraft operating on an IFR certificate of convenience and flight plan within controlled necessity from the Civil airspace and principally during Aeronautics Board (Definition the enroute phase of flight. also includes those foreign air Approved Instrument Approach carriers authorized by agreement Instrument approaches to operate at points within the meeting the design U.S.) requirements, equipment Certificated Air Carrier Airport specifications, and accuracies, An airport at which certificated as determined by periodic FAA air carriers operate on a scheduled flight checks, are approved for basis. general use and publications by Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) FAA. A navigation ground station Area Navigation (Rnav) capable of receiving interrogations A method of navigation that from aircraft and transmitting signals permits aircraft operations on allowing distance computations to be any desired course within the made. This station is usually sited coverage of station referenced with a VOR and at times with an ILS. navigation s signals or within the Enroute Navigation Facility limits of self-contained system Any electronic aid, light or capability. painted marker designed to assist 'm Automated Radar Terminal System fixing the position of an aircraft, (ARTS) particularly on the way from flight A digital processing and origination to the destination point. display system designed for the Flight Service Station (FSS) control of terminal area traffic A facility operated by the FAA to under radar surveillance. provide flight assistance service. Aviation Facilities General Aviation Airports, heliports and All aviation activity in the U.S. seaplane bases provided to which is neither military nor support air carriers, general conducted on the scheduled service aviation, and military aviation of the certificated air carrier aircraft. operations. In some instances, General Aviation Facility the term may include navigation, Airports, heliports, and approach, and traffic control seaplane bases to support the facilities. operations of general aviation Category I airlines. ILS ceiling minimum of 200 feet and one-half mile visibility. Category II ILS ceiling minimum of 50 to 100 feet and 1/4 mile visibility. Airports Systems Plan Mid-America Regional Council Page 55 Instrument Approach Microwave Landing System The act of making an (MLS) approach to an airport solely by An advanced form of reference to instruments. To be precision approach equipment counted in FAA statistics as an with improved accuracy and instrument approach, the aircraft fewer siting problems than must descend through the ILS. MLS also has the useful clouds at some interval from the potential to permit curved path initial approach fix to the airport. approaches to the runway Instrument Approach Facility instead of the straight path Any of the electronic aids limitations of ILS and PAR. designed to provide guidance Minimum Enroute Altitude while making an instrument (MEA) approach. The altitude in effect Instrument Landing System between radio fixes which (see Precision Approach assures acceptable Systems) navigational signal coverage Instrument Operation and meets obstruction A takeoff or landing of an clearance requirements aircraft while on an instrument between those fixes. flight clearance. Navigation Aid Intermittent Positive Control (IPC) Any device guiding or An intermittent form of controlling flight in the air or ground-based air traffic control the landing or takeoff of which will provide advisory and aircraft. separation services to VFR Navigation Ground Station aircraft. A ground based electronic Itinerant Operations station designed to transmit All operations at an airport and/or receive signals for air that are not local. navigation. Local Operations Nondirectional Beacon (NDB) Operations at an airport A low or medium resulting from flights frequency radio beacon which essentially within sight of the transmits nondirectional airport. signals whereby the pilot of an Localizer Back Course Approach (LBC) aircraft equipped with a loop A localizer is an electronic antenna can determine his signal from a transmitter bearing and 'home' on the located at the opposite end of station (see Nonprecision a runway from the primary Instrument Approach) approach direction. A Back Course approach would be a non-precision approach to the localizer end (secondary approach direction) of the runway. Airports Systems Plan Mid-America Regional Council Page 55 Nonprecision Instrument Practical Hourly Capacity (PHOCAP) Approach Theoretical number of An electronic aid designed hourly operations that can be to provide an approach path handled by an airport without for alignment of an aircraft on exceeding certain delay final approach to a runway. It criteria. PHOCAP is lacks the high accuracy calculated considering the qualities of the precision same factors as used to approach equipment and calculate PANCAP. does not provide descent Precision Instrument Approach guidance. (The VHF Omni System range [VOR] and the An electronic. aid Nondirectional Homing designed to provide an Beacon [NDB] are but two approach path for exact examples of the of equipment alignment and descent of an used.) aircraft on final approach to a Operation runway (instrument landing An aviation operation is system [ILS], precision either a takeoff or landing an approach radar [PAR], and aircraft. microwave landing system Positive Controlled Airspace (PCA) [MLS] are examples.) Any volume of airspace for Satellite Airport which the following prerequisites An air carrier airport in a for use apply: a) An ATC metropolitan area operated clearance is required prior to as a part of an air carrier entry; b) The aircraft must be airport system whose equipped with specified purpose is to relieve the minimum level of avionics or principal airport of congestion better: 1) two-way, air ground by dispersing scheduled communication 2) navigation flight operations into areas aids, 3) beacon transponder; c) from which large numbers of The pilot has a specified passengers originate. minimum rating or better and Scheduled Commuter Airline must observe the procedures A company (or individual) specified for the airspace. providing at least five round Practical Annual Capacity (PANCAP) trip flights weekly on a The theoretical number of published schedule for the annual operations that can purpose of carrying be handled by an airport passengers and/or cargo, or without exceeding certain one who has a contract with delay criteria. PANCAP is the U.S. Postal Service to calculated considering types carry mail. The aircraft is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interim Criteria for Precision Approach Obstacle Assessment and Category II/III Instrument Landing System
    Canceled by Order 8260.3C [03-14-2016] Federal Aviation Administration Memorandum Date: AUG 1 6 2011 To: Chas. Frederic Anderson, Acting Director, Aeronautical Products, AJV-3 From: Leslie H. Smith, Manager, Flight Technologies~:f~~J~~UO¥' AFS-400 Subject: Interim Criteria for Precision Approach Obstacle Assessment and Category WIII Instrument Landing System (ILS) Requirements This memorandum cancels and replaces the December 21, 2007 memorandum, same subject. It incorporates minor editorial revisions as well as the following changes summarized below: 1. A reference to Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13, Airport Design, has been added to paragraph 2.3.2. Paragraphs 2.3.2a, b, c, and d have been deleted since the information duplicates the relevant content in this AC. 2. The formula for Case 2 in paragraph 6.9.1 has been corrected to reflect the use of"f" instead of"e". 3. The formula at the bottom of figure 5 has been corrected to reflect the use of the airport elevation instead ofthe runway elevation. Change bars in the margin of Appendix 1 indicate changes made from the 21 Dec 2007 memorandum. Incorporation ofthese criteria into Order 8260.3B has been delayed; apply the criteria in the attachments to this memorandum in the interim. Ifyou have any questions, please contact AFS-420 at 405-954-4164. Attachment: Appendix ] cc: Wayne D. Fetty, Division Manager, U.S. Air Force Instrument Procedure Center James M. Foster, Branch Manager, U.S. Army Aeronautical Services Agency Daniel E. Lehman, Deputy Head, U.S. Naval Flight Information Group CANCELEDArthur J. Snyder, CDR, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • TP308 Vol 3.Pdf
    TP 308/GPH 209 CRITERIA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INSTRUMENT PROCEDURES TP 308 / GPH 209 – CHANGE 7 VOLUME 3 PRECISION APPROACH (PA) PROCEDURE CONSTRUCTION TRANSPORT CANADA NATIONAL DEFENSE 5 January 2017 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TP 308/GPH 209 Volume 3 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Definitions ....................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2. GENERAL CRITERIA ................................................................................... 2–1 2.0 General ....................................................................................................................................... 2–1 2.1 Data Resolution .......................................................................................................................... 2–1 2.2 Procedure Identification .............................................................................................................. 2–1 2.3 En Route, Initial, And Intermediate Segments ............................................................................ 2–1
    [Show full text]
  • User Requirements for Air Traffic Services Effective 1 January 2010
    User Requirements for Air Traffic Services Effective 1 January 2010 International Air Transport Association Montreal — Geneva 2nd Edition NOTICE DISCLAIMER. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regula- tions. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Association shall not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof. Furthermore, the International Air Transport Association expressly disclaims any and all liability to any person or entity, whether a purchaser of this publication or not, in respect of anything done or omitted, and the consequences of anything done or omitted, by any such person or entity in reliance on the contents of this publication. © International Air Transport Association. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recast, reformatted or trans- mitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, record- ing or any information storage and retrieval sys- tem, without the prior written permission from: Senior Vice President Safety, Operations & Infrastructure International Air Transport Association 800 Place Victoria P.O. Box 113 Montreal, Quebec CANADA H4Z 1M1 User
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Acronyms
    Aviation Acronyms 5010 AIRPORT MASTER RECORD (FAA FORM 5010-1) 7460-1 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION 7480-1 NOTICE OF LANDING AREA PROPOSAL 99'S NINETY-NINES (WOMEN PILOTS' ASSOCIATION) A/C AIRCRAFT A/DACG ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE AIRFIELD CONTROL GROUP A/FD AIRPORT/FACILITY DIRECTORY A/G AIR - TO - GROUND A/G AIR/GROUND AAA AUTOMATED AIRLIFT ANALYSIS AAAE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES AAC MIKE MONRONEY AERONAUTICAL CENTER AAI ARRIVAL AIRCRAFT INTERVAL AAIA AIRPORT AND AIRWAY IMPROVEMENT ACT AALPS AUTOMATED AIR LOAD PLANNING SYSTEM AANI AIR AMBULANCE NETWORK AAPA ASSOCIATION OF ASIA-PACIFIC AIRLINES AAR AIRPORT ACCEPTANCE RATE AAS ADVANCED AUTOMATION SYSTEM AASHTO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS AC AIRCRAFT COMMANDER AC AIRFRAME CHANGE AC AIRCRAFT AC AIR CONTROLLER AC ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC ASPHALT CONCRETE ACAA AIR CARRIER ACCESS ACT ACAA AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ACAIS AIR CARRIER ACTIVITY INFORMATION SYSTEM ACC AREA CONTROL CENTER ACC AIRPORT CONSULTANTS COUNCIL ACC AIRCRAFT COMMANDER ACC AIR CENTER COMMANDER ACCC AREA CONTROL COMPUTER COMPLEX ACDA APPROACH CONTROL DESCENT AREA ACDO AIR CARRIER DISTRICT OFFICE ACE AVIATION CAREER EDUCATION ACE CENTRAL REGION OF FAA ACF AREA CONTROL FACILITY ACFT AIRCRAFT ACI-NA AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL - NORTH AMERICA ACID AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION ACIP AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING ACLS AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ACLT ACTUAL CALCULATED LANDING TIME Page 2 ACMI AIRCRAFT, CREW, MAINTENANCE AND INSURANCE (cargo) ACOE U.S. ARMY
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    9/1/96 FAA No. 405 SECTION 3 AREA NAVIGATION APPROACH (CONVENTIONAL LANDING) SURVEYS 9/1/96 FAA No. 405 SECTION 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS AREA NAVIGATION APPROACH (CONVENTIONAL LANDING) SURVEYS SUBSECTION PAGE ____________________________________________________________________________________ 1. DESCRIPTION .................................................................... 3.1. 2. DATUM TIE AND LOCAL CONTROL ................................................. 3.1. 3. ACCURACIES ..................................................................... 3.1. 4. RUNWAY AND STOPWAY POINTS ................................................... 3.1. 5. NAVIGATIONAL AIDS ............................................................. 3.2. 6. OBSTRUCTIONS .................................................................. 3.2. 6.1. DEFINITION ................................................................. 3.2. 6.2. OBSTRUCTION IDENTIFICATION SURFACES .................................... 3.3. 6.3. SPECIAL CASES .............................................................. 3.7. 6.4. SELECTION ................................................................. 3.9. 7. PLANIMETRIC DETAIL ........................................................... 3.10. 8. METEOROLOGICAL APPARATUS .................................................. 3.10. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ................................................................ 3.10. 10. DATA DELIVERY ................................................................ 3.10. 9/1/96 FAA No. 405 TABLE OF CONTENT CONT. ________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Tls® Transponder Landing System
    tls ® transponder landing system The Transponder Landing System (tls) is a technology breakthrough with unprecedented capability to improve airport safety and accessibility [ introducing tls ] [ tls applications ] [ tls product overview ] [ features + benefits] anpc is the world’s only supplier of the Precision approach for terrain-challenged The tls is a precision approach guidance and Precision approach guidance Transponder Landing System (tls). airports with: surveillance system designed to provide all-weather • Provides a stabilized ils glide path, the single airfield access and situational awareness for improved The tls is a precision landing system for use at • Short runways that cannot comply with ils most important safety improvement at terrain airport accessibility and safety. The tls provides the airports where terrain or land constraints make localizer siting standards challenged landing areas capabilities of an ils where traditional ils equipment Instrument Landing System (ils) installation cannot be sited due to rugged terrain or limited property. infeasible or cost-prohibitive. anpc’s patented • Runways ending at a body of water • Provides precision ils Localizer to align the air- In a transportable configuration, the Transportable transponder tracking technology provides high- craft with the runway centerline for every landing • Terrain upslope under the approach path that tls (ttls) is a highly mobile, rugged, and quickly precision aircraft positioning in real-time for area would prevent an ils glide slope transmission deployable atc solution for expeditionary forces during par operator console for military operations surveillance and all-weather precision instrument from passing flight inspection contingency operations. Both tls and ttls provide approach to airports and landing areas worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter: 4. Approaches
    Chapter 4 Approaches Introduction This chapter discusses general planning and conduct of instrument approaches by pilots operating under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Parts 91,121, 125, and 135. The operations specifications (OpSpecs), standard operating procedures (SOPs), and any other FAA- approved documents for each commercial operator are the final authorities for individual authorizations and limitations as they relate to instrument approaches. While coverage of the various authorizations and approach limitations for all operators is beyond the scope of this chapter, an attempt is made to give examples from generic manuals where it is appropriate. 4-1 Approach Planning within the framework of each specific air carrier’s OpSpecs, or Part 91. Depending on speed of the aircraft, availability of weather information, and the complexity of the approach procedure Weather Considerations or special terrain avoidance procedures for the airport of intended landing, the in-flight planning phase of an Weather conditions at the field of intended landing dictate instrument approach can begin as far as 100-200 NM from whether flight crews need to plan for an instrument the destination. Some of the approach planning should approach and, in many cases, determine which approaches be accomplished during preflight. In general, there are can be used, or if an approach can even be attempted. The five steps that most operators incorporate into their flight gathering of weather information should be one of the first standards manuals for the in-flight planning phase of an steps taken during the approach-planning phase. Although instrument approach: there are many possible types of weather information, the primary concerns for approach decision-making are • Gathering weather information, field conditions, windspeed, wind direction, ceiling, visibility, altimeter and Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) for the airport of setting, temperature, and field conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Aviation (Aeronautical Radio Navigation)
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS SUPPLEMENT No. 5 17th February, 2020 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS SUPPLEMENT to The Uganda Gazette No. 11, Volume CXIII, dated 14th , 2020 Printed by UPPC, Entebbe, by Order of the Government. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2020 No. 27. THE CIVIL AVIATION (AERONAUTICAL RADIO NAVIGATION AIDS) REGULATIONS, 2020. ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS Regulation PART I—PRELIMINARY 1. Title 2. Application 3. Interpretation PART II—GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 4. Requirements for communication, navigation and surveillance facilities 5. Certification of Air Navigation Service Provider 6. Application for approval 7. Siting and installation 8. Installation, operation and maintenance of communication, navigation and surveillance systems 9. Commissioning of facilities 10. Inspections and audits 11. Availability and reliability 12. Test equipment 13. Record keeping 14. Documentation 1939 Regulation 15. Periodic inspection and testing 16. Flight inspection 17. Operation and maintenance plan 18. Training requirements for communication, navigation and surveillance personnel 19. Communication, navigation and surveillance personnel requirements 20. Proficiency certification program PART III—RADIO NAVIGATION AIDS 21. Standard radio navigation aids 22. Precision approach radar 23. Composition of the precision approach radar systems 24. Specifications for precision approach radar elements 25. Specifications for surveillance radar element 26. Provision of information on the operational status of radio navigation aids 27. Power supply for radio navigation aids and communication systems 28. Human factors considerations 29. Basic requirements for instrument landing system 30. Operational status indications 31. Basic requirements for construction and adjustment instrument landing system 32. Localizer and glide path components of facility performance categories 33. ILS level of safety 34. Two ILS facilities serving opposite ends of a single runway 35.
    [Show full text]
  • 120 Public Use Airport
    602 KAR 20:120. Public use airport. RELATES TO: KRS 183.090 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS 183.024 NECESSITY, FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY: This administrative regulation sets forth the min- imum airport safety standards for classification as a public use airport. Section 1. Definitions. (1) "Airplane" means an engine-driven fixed-wing aircraft heavier than air, that is supported in flight by the dynamic reaction of air against its wing. (2) "Approach surface" means that area extending from the end of the primary surface in an in- clined plane and increasing in elevation at a given ratio of horizontal to vertical fee. (3) "Flight visibility" means the average forward horizontal distance from the cockpit of an aircraft in flight at which prominent unlighted objects may be seen and identified by day and prominent lighted objects may be seen and identified by night. (4) "Landing area" also means runway when used in administrative regulations relating to airports used for the takeoff and landing of airplanes. (5) "Landing area designation" means a certificate of approval of the safety and adequacy, of an airport facility by the Transportation Cabinet. (6) "Public use airport" means an airport with a runway for airplanes which prior permission is not necessary for the landing or taking off of aircraft. (7) "Primary surface" means a surface longitudinally centered on a runway. When the runway has a specially prepared hard surface, the primary surface extends 200 feet beyond each end of that runway; but when the runway has no specially prepared hard surface, or planned hard surface, the primary surface ends at each end of that runway.
    [Show full text]
  • (Radio Navigation Aids) Regulations, 2018 Arrangement of Regulations Regulation Part I—Preliminary Provisions 1
    SPECIAL ISSUE 2071 Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 92 3rd July, 2018 (Legislative Supplement No. 46) LEGAL NOTICE NO. 145 THE CIVIL AVIATION ACT, 2013 (NO. 21 OF 2013) THE CIVIL AVIATION (RADIO NAVIGATION AIDS) REGULATIONS, 2018 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS REGULATION PART I—PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS 1. Citation. 2. Interpretation. 3. Application. PART II—GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 4. Requirements for Communication, Navigation and Surveillance (CNS) Facilities. 5. Certification of Air Navigation Service Provider. 6. Approval Requirement. 7. Inspections and Audits. 8. Siting and Installation. 9. Commissioning Requirement. 10. Availability and reliability of CNS facilities. 11. Interface arrangement for support services. 12. Record Keeping and documentation. 13. Operations Manual. 14. Periodic Inspection, Testing and Security of CNS facilities. 15. Flight Inspection and facility check after accident or incident. 16. Radio frequency management and interference reporting. 17. CNS. Personnel Training and other requirements. 18. Facility malfunction incident reporting and operational status of CNS systems. 19. Proficiency certification program. 20. Safety case, notification of Aeronautical facility status and 2072 Kenya Subsidiary Legislation, 2018 interruption to service. PART III—RADIO NAVIGATION AIDS 21. Standard radio navigation aids. 22. Precision Approach radar. 23. Composition of the Precision approach radar systems. 24. Specifications for Precision Approach Radar elements. 25. Specifications. for Surveillance radar element. 26. Provision of information on the operational status of radio navigation aids. 27. Power supply for radio navigation aids and communication systems. 28. Human factor considerations. 29. Basic requirements for Instrument Landing System- Composition. 30. Operational Status indications. 31. Basic requirements for Instrument Landing System- construction and adjustment. 32. Localizer and Glide path components of facility performance categories.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA JO Order 7110.65W, Air Traffic Control
    ORDER JO 7110.65W Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: December 10, 2015 SUBJ: Air Traffic Control This order prescribes air traffic control procedures and phraseology for use by personnel providing air traffic control services. Controllers are required to be familiar with the provisions of this order that pertain to their operational responsibilities and to exercise their best judgment if they encounter situations not covered by it. Distribution: ZAT-710, ZAT-464 Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, System Operations Services RECORD OF CHANGES DIRECTIVE NO. JO 7110.65W CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS TO OPTIONAL TO OPTIONAL BASIC BASIC FAA Form 1320−5 (6−80) USE PREVIOUS EDITION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7110.65W CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG 1 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: 05/26/16 SUBJ: Air Traffic Control 1. Purpose of This Change. This change transmits revised pages to Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7110.65W, Air Traffic Control, and the Briefing Guide. 2. Audience. This change applies to all Air Traffic Organization (ATO) personnel and anyone using ATO directives. 3. Where Can I Find This Change? This change is available on the FAA Web site at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices/. 4. Explanation of Policy Change. See the Explanation of Changes attachment which has editorial corrections and changes submitted through normal procedures. The Briefing Guide lists only new or modified material, along with background. 5. Distribution. This change is distributed to selected offices in Washington headquarters, regional offices, service area offices, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Ne"Wsletter
    SOUTH CAROLINA 0 ~ 0 AVIATION NE"WSLETTER G . C. MERCHANT. JR .. DIRECTOR J. F. BARRY. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR = No. 9 September, 1969 3so95 AVIATION EDUCATION WORKSHOP Twenty-nine public school teachers were awarded certificates upon completion of the seventeenth annual Aviation Education Workshop. The Workshop was held at the University of South Carolina, School of Education, and was sponsored by the S.c. Aeronautics Commission. 2 Scholarships for the course were awarded by the sponsor. The course, which was directed by John F. Barry, Assistant Director of the Aeronautics Commission is designed to give the teachers an orientation in all phases of Aviation and carries three semester hours credit at the University. Three field trips were conducted during the three week Workshop . The first was a visit to Wings & Wheels Museum at Santee, where the teachers got a first-hand picture of the history of aviation. Aircraft for the flight to Santee were provided by VIP Aviation, Miller Aviation, Midland Aviation, Earle Kirkwood, John Owen, the S.C. Wildlife Department, S.C. Law Enforcement Division, and the S.C. Aeronautics Commission. A visit to the Beaufort Marine Corps Air Station in Marine C 47's afforded the teachers their first opportunity to fly in a military aircraft. The final field trip was a tour of the Aerospace facilities at Cape Kennedy. Transportation for this trip was furnished by the u.s. Air Force, Washington, D.C. The following teachers were awarded certificates: Mrs. Jo Frances Auld, Columbia; Mrs. Nancy S. Aull, west Columbia; Mrs. Betty H. Baker, Columbia; Mrs. Martha G.
    [Show full text]