* I IITT»*» * ^ A SCRIPTA % FEDERAL& nREGISTER p ' 9 3 4 ^ VOLUME 20 NUMBER 148 * (flVITEO ^

Washington, Saturday, July 3 0 , 7955

retary of Agriculture may, within the CONTENTS TITLE 3— THE PRESIDENT limitation of such rules and regulations, EXECUTIVE ORDER 10624 prescribe necessary implementing direc­ THE PRESIDENT tions. The Secretary of Agriculture may Regulations R elating to P ersonnel of designate employees of the Department Executive Order Page the Department of Agriculture As­ of Agriculture to make specific determi­ Regulations relating to personnel signed to Service Abroad nations and take specific actions in the of Department of Agriculture By virtue of the authority vested in application of such rules and regulations assigned to service abroad___ 5445 me by sections 602 (d), 603, and 605 of to the activities of the Department of EXECUTIVE AGENCIES Title VI of the act of August 28, 1954, 68 Agriculture. Agricultural Marketing Service Stat. 908, 909, and by section 301 of title Sec. 3. Such provisions in annual ap­ 3 of the United States Code, and as Presi­ Proposed rule making: propriation acts of the Department of Milk handling: dent of the United States, I hereby pre­ State, including such acts hereafter en­ scribe the following regulations relating Oklahoma City, Okla______- 5461 acted, facilitating the work of the For­ South Bend-La Porte, Ind__ 5461 to personnel of the Department of Agri­ eign Service of the United States as the culture assigned to service abroad: Rules and regulations: Director of the Bureau of the Budget Lemons in California and Ari­ Section 1. (a) The provisions of Part shall from time to time determine appro­ zona______5450 II—Procedures for Coordination priate shall be applicable to activities Milk handling: Abroad—of Executive Order No. 10575 of authorized under Title VI of the said act Chicago, 111______5450 November 6, 1954, shall be applicable to of August 28, 1954. Milwaukee, Wis______5448 the official activities of persons assigned This order shall be effective as of Sep­ South Bend-La Porte, Ind__ 5451 abroad under authority of Title VI of the tember 1, 1954. Oranges, Valencia, in Arizona said act of August 28,1954. and part of California______5449 (b) The Secretary of Agriculture shall Dwight D. E isenhower institute and maintain such measures Agricultural Research Service T he White House, Proposed rule making: consistent with the said Part II as may July 28,1955. be necessary to insure that the official Recognition of breeds and books activities of persons assigned abroad un­ [F. R. Doc. 55-6222; Filed, July 29, 1955; of record of purebred an­ der the said Title VI are carried on con­ 10:03 a. m.] imals______- 5462 sonant with United States foreign-policy Rules and regulations: objectives as defined by the Secretary of Khapra beetle quarantine; ad­ State and are effectively coordinated TITLE 5— ADMINISTRATIVE ministrative instructions des­ with the activities of representatives of PERSONNEL ignating premises as regulated other United States agencies, under the areas______T------!— 5447 leadership of the Chief of the United Chapter I— Civil Service Commission Agriculture Department States Diplomatic Mission. Part 6—Exceptions F rom the See Agricultural Marketing Serv­ (c) Consistent with subsections (a) Competitive Service ice; Agricultural Research Serv­ and (b) of this section, the Secretary of ice; Commodity Credit Corpora­ Agriculture shall issue instructions on DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR tion; Commodity Stabilization agricultural matters to persons assigned Effective upon publication in the F ed­ Service. abroad under authority of the said Title eral R egister, paragraphs (a) (12), Army Department VI. (13) and (14), and (c) (5), and (k) (4) Rules and regulations: Sec. 2. Rules and regulations pre­ are added to § 6.110 as set out below. Enlistment, qualifications for— 5457 scribed by the Secretary of State under Reserve Officers’ Training § 6.110 Department of the Interior— Corps; organization a n d authority vested in him by Title IX of (a) General^'* * the Foreign Service Act of 1946, as here­ training of units; conditions tofore or hereafter amended, or under (12) Subject to prior approval of the for enrollment in specific authority thereunder heretofore or here­ Commission, temporary, intermittent, or course______5456 after delegated to him by the President, seasonal positions at GS-7 and below in Civil Aeronautics Administra­ nonprofessional mining activities in with respect to allowances and benefits tion under the said Title IX shall be appli­ Alaska, such as drillers, miners, cater­ Rules and regulations: cable to personnel assigned abroad under pillar operators and samplers, not to Standard instrument approach Title VI of the said act of August 28, exceed 180 working days a year, when procedure alterations______5452 1954: Provided, (1) that the Secretary of the activity is carried on in a remote or State, upon request of the Secretary of Civil Aeronautics Board isolated area, there is no Board of U. S. Notices: Agriculture, may prescribe, within exist­ Civil Service Examiners to service the ing authority of law and when deemed Ozark Airlines, Inc.; postpone­ necessary, special rules and regulations employing establishment, and there is ment of prehearing confer­ for such personnel; and (2) that the Sec­ (Continued on p. 5447) ence______- 5471 5445 5446 RULES AND REGULATIONS

CONTENTS—Continued CONTENTS—Continued Civil Aeronautics Board— Con. Fa&e Interstate Commerce Commis- Page FEDERAL^ptEGISTER Proposed rule making: sion— Continued \ t%ITtOV 1934 <,^ Certification and operation rules Proposed rule making: for scheduled air carrier op­ Rules of procedure_- ______5466 Published daily, except Sundays, Mondays, erations outside continental and days following official Federal holidays, limits of U. S.; flight time Land Management Bureau by the Federal Register Division, National limitations for pilots not Notices: Archives and Records Service, General Serv­ regularly assigned to one type Idaho ; proposed withdrawal ices Administration, pursuant to the au­ . of crew______5466 and reservation of lands___ 5467 thority contained in the Federal Register Act, Rules and regulations: approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as Civil Service Commission amended; 44 U. S. C., ch. 8B), under regula­ Montana; reservation of public tions prescribed by the Administrative Com* Rules and regulations: lands in connection with Bull m ittee of the Federal Register, approved by Exceptions from competitive Mountain Game Refuge___ 5457 the President. Distribution is made only by service; Interior Department- 5445 the Superintendent of Documents, Govern­ Securities and Exchange Com­ m ent Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Commerce Department mission T h e F ederal Register will be furnished by See Civil Aeronautics Administra­ Notices: mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 tion. Dodge & Cox Fund; filing for per month or $15.00 per year, payable in order------5473 advance. The charge for individual copies Commodify Credit Corporation (minimum 15 cents) varies in proportion to Veterans Administration the size of thé issue. Remit check or money Rules and regulations: Rules and regulations: order, made payable to the Superintendent Grain sorghums, 1955-crop, loan Title HI; loan guaranty______5476 of Documents, directly to the Government and purchase agreement pro­ Printing Office, W ashington 25, D. C. gram; basic county support The regulatory material appearing herein CODIFICATION GUIDE Is keyed to the Code of F ederal Regulations, rates______5447 which is published, under 50 titles, pursuant Commodity Stabilization Service A numerical list of the parts of the Code to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as of Federal Regulations affected by documents amended August 5, 1953. The Code of F ed­ See also Commodity Credit Cor­ published in this issue. Proposed rules, as eral Regulations is sold by the Superin­ poration. opposed to final actions, are identified as tendent of Documents. Prices of books and Rules and regulations: su c h . pocket supplements vary. Wheat marketing quotas for There are no restrictions on the re­ 1955 crop; dates by which Title 3 Pag« publication of material appearing in the Chapter H (Executive orders): F ederal R egister, or th e Code of Federal acreage must be utilized as R egulations. cover crop______5448 10575 (see EO 10624)______5445 10624______,______5445 Defense Department Title 5 See Army Department. Chapter I: CFR SUPPLEMENTS Federal Communications Com­ Part 6______5445 (For use during 1955) mission Title 6 Rules and regulations: Chapter TV: The following Supplements are now Radio broadcast services; tele­ Part 421______5447 available: vision broadcast stations___ 5457 Title 7 Federal Housing Administration Chapter HI: Title 33 ($1.50) Rules and regulations: Part 301___ 5447 Chapter VII: Title 46: Part 146 to end ($1.25) Insurance; miscellaneous amendments______5475 Part 728______5448 Chapter IX: Previously announced: Title 3, 1954 Supp. Federal Power Commission Part 905 (proposed)______5461 ($1.75); Titles 4 -5 ($0.70); Title 6 Part 907______5448 ($2.00); Title 7: fcirts 1-209 ($0.60); Notices: Hearings, etc.: Part 922____ 5449 Parts 210-899 ($2.50); Part 900 to end Part 941_____ 5450 ($2.25); Title 8 ($0.45); Title 9 ($0.65); Carr, A. Plack______5472 Titles 10-13 ($0.50); Title 14: Parts Edgerton, Halsey C., et al___ 5473 Part 953___ 5450 1-399 ($2.25); Part 400 to end ($0.65); James, T. L., and Co., Inc., Part 967______5451 Title 15 ($1.25); Title 16 ($1.25); Title 17 et al_____ .______5472 Proposed rules______5461 ($0.55); Title 18 ($0.50); Title 19 ($0.40); Lowry, Tim G______5471 Title 9 Title 20 ($0.75); Title 21 ($1.75); Titles Midstates Oil Corp______5472 Chapter I: 2 2 -2 3 ($0.75); Title 24 ($0.75); Title 25 Orange Grove Oil & Gas Co. Part 151 (proposed)______5462 ($0.50); Title 26: Parts 1-79 ($0.35); and H. J. Mosser______5473 Parts 80-169 ($0.50); Parts 170-182 Slick-Moorman Oil Co. et al_ 5471 Title 14 ($0.50); Parts 183-299 ($0.30); Part 300 Chapter I: to end and Title 27 ($1.25); Titles 28—29 General Services Administration Part 41 (proposed)______5466 ($1.25); Titles 30-31 ($1.25); Title 32A, Notices: Revised December 3Tr 1954 ($1.50); Titles Chapter II: 3 5 -3 7 ($0.75); Title 38 ($2.00); Title 39 Federal office building; pro­ Part 609______5452 ($0.75); Titles 4 0-42 ($0.50); Titles 4 4 - spectus for proposed building Title 24 45 ($0.75); Title 46: Parts 1-145 ($0.40); in southwestern portion of Chapter II: Titles 4 7 -4 8 ($1.25); Title 49: Parts 1-70 District of Columbia______5474 Part 221_.______5475 ($0.60); Parts 7 1 -9 0 ($0.75); Parts 9 1 - Part 225______5476 164 ($0.50); Part 165 to end ($0.60); Interior Department Title 50 ($0.55) See Land Management Bureau. Part 261______5476 Part 266______5476 Part 294______5476 Order from Superintendent of Documents, Interstate Commerce Commis­ Government Printing Office, Washington sion Title 32 25, D. C. Notices: Chapter V: Fourth section applications for Part 562__ 5456 relief______,______5473 Part 571______5457 Saturday, July 30, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 5447

Title 38 Page modity Stabilization Service published in San Joaquin Crops, 1600 T Street, Bakers­ 20 F. R. 3701 and containing the specific field . Chapter I: Titsworth Milling Co., Calipatria Highway, Part 36_------—— 5476 requirements for the 1955-Crop Grain B raw ley. Sorghums Price Support Program are Yuba City Mills, 324 A Street, Yuba City. Title 43 hereby amended as follows: Chapter I: Section 421.1233 (c) (1) is amended by b. The following premises are added to Appendix (Public land orders): increasing the basic county support rate the list, contained in such instructions, 1197—------— 5457 per 100 pounds for Hidalgo County, New of warehouses, mills, and other premises Title 47 Mexico, from $1.72 to $1.85 and for Quay in which infestations of the khapra Chapter I: County, New Mexico, from $1.61 to $1.66. beetle have been determined to exist. Such premises are thereby designated as part 3------— ------5457 (Sec. 4, 62 sta t. 1070 as amended; 15 U. S. C. 714b. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 62 Stat. regulated areas within the meaning of Title 49 1072; secs. 301, 401, 63 Stat. 1053; 15 U. S. C. said quarantine and regulations: Chapter I: 714; 7 U. S. C. 1447, 1421) Part 1 (proposed)------5466 Arizona Issued this 27th day of July 1955. Frank Kornegay Farm (storage bins), 10th Street and Avenue D, Yuma. a shortage of available candidates for [seal! Earl M. Hughes, Long’s Dairy (bam ), Buckeye. the positions. Executive Vice President, South Central Feed & Supply (warehouse), (13) Subject to prior approval of the Commodity Credit Corporation. 3710 South Central Avenue, Phoenix. p m mission, temporary part-time, or California [P. R. Doc. 55-6183; Piled, July 29, 1955; intermittent employment of mechanics, 8:51 a. m.] DeRadd Warehouse, 400 E Street, Lemoore. skilled laborers, equipment operators and C. P. Hiles Ranch, Route 5, Box 2309, tradesmen on construction, repair, or O roville. maintenance work for not to exceed 180 TITLE 7— AGRICULTURE Pauba Ranch Mill & Feed Yard (Vail Co., working days a year in Alaska, when the owner), north side of Highway 71, 3 lA m ile s activity is carried on in a remote or Chapter 111-—Agricultural Research north of junction with Highway 395, south of isolated area, there is no Board of U. S. Service, Department of Agriculture T em ecu la.. Civil Service Examiners to service the This amendment shall be effective July employing establishment, and there is a [P. P. C. 612, Revised, Supp. 2] 30, 1955. shortage of available candidates for the P art 301—Domestic Quarantine Notices This amendment revokes the designa­ positions. tion as regulated areas of a number of (14) Seasonal airplane pilots and air­ Subpart—K hapra B eetle warehouses, mills, and other premises, it plane mechanics in Alaska, not to exceed having been determined by the Chief of 180 working days a year. a m e n d m e n t o f administrative in s t r u c ­ the Plant Pest Control Branch that ade­ ***** t i o n s DESIGNATING PREMISES AS REGU­ LATED AREAS UNDER REGULATIONS quate sanitation measures have been (c) Bureau of Indian Affairs. * * * SUPPLEMENTAL TO KHAPRA BEETLE QUAR­ practiced for a sufficient length of time (5) . Subject to prior approval of the ANTINE to eradicate the khapra beetle in and Commission, assistants in Alaska native upon such premises. It also adds schools (not including teachers and in­ Pursuant to § 301.76-2 of the regula­ premises to the list of warehouses, mills, structors) at a salary rate not in excess tions supplemental to the Khapra Beetle and other premises in which khapra of that of GS-4 or its equivalent where Quarantine (§ 301.76-2, 20 F. R. 1012) beetle infestations have been determined the schools are in isolated or remote under section 8 of the Plant Quarantine to exist, and designates such premises as areas or lack suitable quarters. Act of 1912, as amended (7 U. S. C. 161), regulated areas under the khapra beetle revised administrative instructions is­ ***** quarantine and regulations. (k) O ffice of Territories. * * * sued as § 301.76-2a (20 F. R. 4361), effective June 22, 1955, as amended ef­ This amendment in part imposes re­ (4) Until December 31, 1955, all posi­ strictions supplementing khapra beetle tions in the Alaska ,Railroad. fective July 13, 1955 (20 F. R. 4979), are hereby amended in the following re­ quarantine regulations already effective. (R. S. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403; 5 U. S. C. spects: It also relieves restrictions insofar as it 631, 633r E. O. 10440, March 31, 1953, 18 F. R. a. The designation as regulated areasrevokes the designation of presently reg­ 1823, 3 CFR 1953 S u p p .) of the following warehouses, mills, and ulated areas. It must be made effective United States Civil Serv­ other premises, included in the list con­ promptly in order to carry out the pur­ ice Commission, tained in such instructions, is hereby poses of the regulations and to permit [seal] W m. C. H ull, revoked, and the reference to such prem­ unrestricted movement „ of regulated Executive Assistant. ises in the list is hereby deleted, it having been determined by the Chief of the products from the premises being re­ [P. R. Doc. 55-8221; Piled, July 29, 1955; Plant Pest Control Branch that adequate moved from designation as regulated 9:07 a. m.] sanitation measures have been practiced areas. Accordingly, under section 4 of for a sufficient length of time to eradicate the Administrative Procedure Act (5 TITLE 6— AGRICULTURAL CREDIT the khapra beetle in and upon such U. S. C. 1003), it is found upon good cause premises: that notice and other public procedure Chapter IV— Commodity Stabilization Arizona with respect to the foregoing amendment Service and Commodity Credit Cor­ Haffey’s Market, Beal Street, Kingman. are impracticable and contrary to the poration, Department of Agricul­ Stranges Market, 867 Second Avenue, Ajo. public interest, and good cause is found ture California for making the effective date thereof less than 30 days after publication in the Belluomlni Milling Corp., 1616 U Street, Subchapter B— Loans, Purchases, and Other . F ederal R egister. Operations Bakersfield. Currier Bros. Feed Store, 2325 Myers Street, (Secs. 1, 3, 33 Stat. 1269, 1270, sec. 9, 37 Stat. [1955 C. C. C. Grain Price Support Bulletin 1, O roville. 318; 7 U. S. C. 141, 143, 162. Interprets or Supp. l, Arndt. 1, Grain Sorghums] Cutter Grain & Milling Co., west side of applies sec. 8, $7 Stat. 318, as amended; 7 Part 421—G rains and R elated Santa Fe RR., Corcoran. U. S. C. 161) General Mills, Inc., Warehouse, 320 A Commodities Street, Yuba City. Done at Washington, D. C., this 27th Subpart—1955-Crop G rain Sorghums Grange Co., 1152 G Street, Fresno. day of July 1955. oan and urchase greement ro J. C. Hatfield Ranch, Dahlia Canal, P. O. L P A P ­ [SEAL] W. L . POPHAM, gram Box 667, Imperial. J. B. Hill Co., Selma. Chief, c o u n t y SUPPORT RATES; NEW MEXICO Imperial Hay Growers* Association, West * Plant Pest Control Branch. Main and Rio Vista, Brawley. The regulations issued by the Com­ Northrup-King & Co., 324 A Street, Yuba [F. R. Doc. 55-6172; Filed, July 29, 1955; modity Credit Corporation and the Com­ C ity . 8:49 a. m.] 5448 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Chapter Vil— Commodity Stabilization August 15, 1955: Grant over 2,000 feet ele­ W a s h in g t o n — Continued Service (Farm Marketing Quotas vation, Klamath (irrigated). and Acreage Allotments), Depart­ Spring Wheat County Area and type of wheat Dates August 1, 1955: Wasco. ment of Agriculture Pend Oreille. August 10, 1955: Union. Aug. 15,1955 [A rndt. 5] Spokane___ Area due west on north Aug. 5,1955 boundary of township T ennessee 24 to where it inter­ P art 728—W heat May 31, 1955: All counties. cedes the east bound­ ary of range 42 and Subpart—W heat Marketing Quotas for T exas then due south to the 1955 Crop county line. May 15, 1955: Archer, Armstrong, Atascosa, All the remainder of the July 20,1955 DATES BY WHICH WHEAT ACREAGE MUST BE Bailey, Bandera, Baylor, Bexar,. Blanco, county. Stevens...... Winter w h ea t..______July 15,1955 UTILIZED AS WHEAT COVER CROP IN CER­ Borden, Briscoe, Brown, Carson, Castro, Chil­ Spring wheat...... Aug. 1,1955 TAIN STATES dress, Clay, Cochran, Collingsworth, Comal, Walla W alla... Dryland areas below ele­ July 1,1955 Cottle, Crosby, Culberson, Dawson, Deaf vation of airport. The amendment herein is issued All other dryland areas Aug. 1,1955 Smith, Dickens, Donely, Edwards, Floyd, and irrigated section. under the wheat marketing quota pro­ Foard, Gaines, Garza, Gillespie, Glasscock, Yakima. Lower Valley and Glade- June 30,1955 visions of the Agricultural Adjustment Gray, Hale, Hall, Hardeman, Haskell, Hemp­ Central area__ ...... Aug. 10,1955 Act of 1938, as amended, for the purpose hill, Hockley, Howard, Jack, Kendall, Kent, -Upper V alley.:....____ Aug. 31,1955 of publishing and revising the dates in Kerr, Kimble, King, Knox, Lamb, Llano, Lub­ bock, Lynn, McCulloch, Mason, Martin, Mav­ certain counties or areas within a county W isconsin erick, Medina, Midland, Mills, Mitchell, by which wheat acreage on a farm must Montague, Motley, Oldham, Parmer, Pecos, June 20, 1955: Adams, Columbia, Craw­ be utilized as wheat cover crop in the Potter, Randall, Reeves, Roberts, San Saba, ford, Dane, Dodge, Dunn, Eau Claire, Fond States of Idaho, North Carolina, Oregon, Schleicher, Scurry, Stonewall, Swisher, Terry, du Lac, Grant, Green, Greenlake, Iowa, Jack- Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Throckmorton, Uvalde, Wheeler, Wichita, Wil­ son, Jefferson, Juneau, Kenosha, La Crosse, Wisconsin. barger, Wise, Yoakum, Young, and Zavala. Lafayette, Marquette, Milwaukee, Monroe, Since the only purpose of this amend­ May 20, 1955: Dallam, Hansford, Hartley, Ozaukee, Pepin, Portage,' Racine, Richland, ment is to publish or revise the dates by Hutchinson, Lipscomb, Moore, Ochiltree, and Rock, Sauk, Trempealeau, Vernon, Wal­ S h erm a n . worth, Washington, Waukesha, Waushara, which wheat must be used as wheat and Winnebago. cover crop in certain counties in these Washington States and since the farmers involved The dates and other information have already been informed in writing County Area and type of wheat Dales shown in Amendment 1 to the 1955 of the dates, it is hereby found that Wheat Marketing Quota Regulations (20 compliance with the notice, procedure, Adams. Winter wheat______June 30,1955 F. R. 2969) shall be applicable to all Spring wheat...... July 20,1955 and 30-day effective date provisions of Benton. Winter wheat______June 25,1955 counties not listed above. section 4 of the Administrative Pro­ Spring wheat (irrigated) July 15,1955 (Sec. 375, 52 Stat. 66, as amended; 7 U. S. C. ,(no change). cedure Act is impracticable and contrary Chelan. Area A: 1375. Interprets or applies sec. 374, 52 Stat. to the public interest. Therefore, the Spring wheat___ .^ ... Sept. 1,1955 38, as amended; 68 Stat. 904; 7 U. S. C. 1374) amendment herein shall become effec­ Winter wheat____ .... Aug. 25,1955 Area B: Done at Washington, D. C., this 27th tive upon filing of this document with Spring w heat..___..... Aug. 10,1955 day of July 1955. the Director, Division of the Federal Winter wheat______July 25,1955 Columbia. McKay and Harmony Register. communities: [ s e a l ] T r u e D. M orse, Section 728.551 (r), insofar as it re­ Winter wheat____ .... June 25,1955 Acting Secretary of Agriculture. lates to the counties listed below,- is 'Spring wheat__ 1____ July 10,1955 further amended as follows: Huntsville, Columbia, [F. R. Doc. 55-6182; Filed, July 29, 1955; Dayton, Whitstone 8:51 a. m.] and Turner com­ Idaho munities: Winter wheat______July 5,1955 Elevation under 3,500-feet Spring wheat...... July 20,195£r Dittemore and Star August 1, 1955: Benewah, Bonner, Bound­ communities: ary, Clearwater, Idaho, Kootenai, Latah, Winter w heat.___ .... July 10,1955 Chapter IX— Agricultural Marketing Lewis, Nez Perce. Spring wheat______... July 30,1955 Service (Marketing Agreements and Douglas.. Winter wheat___ ...... July 10,1955 Elevation over 3,500 feet Spring wheat______Aug. 10,1955 Orders), Department of Agriculture Ferry___ Winter wheat______July 15,1955 August 15, 1955: Benewah, Bonner, Bound­ Spring wheat______July 30,1955 [Docket No.^AO-212-AlO] ary, Clearwater, Idaho, Kootenai, Latah, Franklin. June 25,1955 Lewis, Nez Perce. Garfield. Central Ferry area____ June 15,1955 P art 907—Milk in Milwaukee, Wis., Dodge Ping, Gould City June 25,1955 Marketing Area Irrigated area. Mayview, Pataha Flat, July 10,1955 ORDER AMENDING THE ORDER, AS AMENDED, . July 15, 1955: Bannock, Franklin, Oneida. Zumwalt, Dutch Flat and Lower Alpowa REGULATING HANDLING July 30, 1955: Caribou. areas. August 1, 1955: Camas. Upper Alpowa, Peola, July 25,1955 § 907.0 Findings and determinations. . Columbia Center and Nonirrigated Scoggin area. The findings and determinations h erein ­ Grant. All areas except subirri­ June 30,1955 after set forth are supplementary and in July 15, 1955: Bannock, Caribou, Franklin, gated section of Wilson O neid a. Creek community. addition to the findings and determina­ August 1, 1955: Camas. Wilson Creek (subirri­ Aug. 10,1955 tions previously made in connection w ith gated section) (do the issuance of the aforesaid order and N orth Carolina , change). ■Kittitas.. Aug. 10,1955 each of the previously issued a m en d ­ May 31, 1955: All Counties. Klickitat. East of Rock Creek and ments thereto; and all previous findings the Goodnoe bills Oregon area: and determinations are hereby ratified Winter wheat______June 30,1955 and affirmed, except insofar as such find­ 'Winter Wheat Sprjng wheat...... July 10,1955 con­ West of Rock Creek and ings and determinations may be in July 1, 1955: Gilliam under 2,000 feet ele­ west of Goodnoe flict with the findings and determina­ vation, Malheur under 3,000 feet elevation, Hills area: tions set forth herein. Morrow under 2,000 feet elevation, Sherman, Winter w h e a t...... July 10,1955 Spring wheat______July 30,1955 (a) Findings u,pon the basis of the Umatilla under 2,000 feet elevation, Wasco. hearing record. Pursuant to the provi­ July 15, 1955: Grant under 2,000 feet ele­ Lincoln. North of Highway No. June 25,1955 sions of the Agricultural M a rk etin g vation, Harney, Malheur over 3,000 feet ele­ 2 and Davenport-Har- vation, Morrow over 3,000 feet elevation, rington Tokio Road Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 east (no change). U. S. C. 601 et seq.), and the a p p lic a b le U n io n . South of Highway No. July 10,1955 July 20, 1955: Jefferson (non-irrigated). 2. rules of practice and procedure g o v e rn ­ July 25, 1955: Gilliam over 2,000 feet ele­ Okanogan...... A-B-H-M communities: ing the formulation of marketing a g ree­ v a tio n . Winter wheat______June 20,1955 Spring wheat___ ..... July 10,1955 ments and orders (7 CFR Part 900) , a August 1, 1955: Crook, Deschutes, Jefferson C-D-E-F-G-I-J-K-L- public hearing was held at M ilw a u k ee, N-O communities: (irrigated) Klamath (nonirrigated), Lake, Wisconsin, on June 15 and 16,1955, up on Umatilla over 2,000 feet elevation, Wheeler. Winter wheat______July 20,1955 Spring wheat..______Aug. 10,1955 proposed amendments to the tentative Saturday, July 30, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 5449 marketing agreement and to the order, ( 1 ) The refusal or failure of such han­ the applicable provisions of the Agri­ as amended, regulating the handling of dlers to sign said proposed marketing cultural Marketing Agreement Act of mille in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin, mar­ agreement tends to prevent the effectua­ 1937, as amended (7 U. S. C. 601 et seq.), keting area. Upon the basis of the evi­ tion of the declared policy of the act; and upon the basis of the recommenda­ dence introduced at such hearing and (2) The issuance of this order amend­ tion and information submitted by the the record thereof, it is hereby found ing the order, as amended, is the only Valencia Orange Administrative Com­ that: practical means pursuant to the de­ mittee, established under the said order, (1) The said order, as amended, and clared policy of the act of advancing the and upon other available information, as hereby further amended, and all of interests of producers of milk which is it is hereby found that the limitation of the terms and conditions of said order, produced for sale in the said marketing handling of such Valencia oranges, as as amended, and as hereby further area; and hereinafter provided, will tend to effec­ amended, will tend to effectuate the de­ (3) The issuance of this order amend­ tuate the declared policy of the act. clared policy of the act; ing the order is approved or favored by ' (2) It is hereby further found that it (2) The parity prices of milk produced at least two-thirds of the producers who is impracticable and contrary to the pub­ for sale in said marketing area as de­ during the determined representative lic interest to give preliminary notice, termined pursuant to section 2 of the period (May 1955) were engaged in the engage in public rule-making procedure, act are not reasonable in view of the production of milk for sale in the said and postpone the effective date of this price of feeds, available supplies of feeds, marketing area. section until 30 days after publication thereof in the F ederal Register (60 Stat. and other economic conditions which Order relative to handling. It is effect market supply and demand for 237; 5 U. S. C. 1001 et seq.) because the therefore ordered, that on and after the time intervening between the date when such milk and the minimum prices speci­ effective date hereof the handling of fied in the order, as amended, and information upon which this section is milk in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin, mar­ based became available and the time as hereby further amended, are such keting area shall be in conformity to prices as will reflect the aforesaid fac­ when this section must become effective and in compliance with the terms and in order to effectuate the declared policy tors, insure a sufficient quantity of pure conditions of the aforesaid order, as and wholesome milk, and be in the public of the act is insufficient, and a reason­ amended, and as hereby further amend­ able time is permitted, under the cir­ interest; and ed, and the aforesaid order, as amended, cumstances, for preparation for such ef­ (3) The said order, as amended, and is hereby further amended as follows: as hereby further amended, regulates the fective time; and good cause exists for 1. In § 907.51 (a) delete the words making the provisions hereof effective handling of milk in the same manner “current supply-demand ratio” and the as, and is applicable only to persons in as hereinafter set forth. The Valencia words “supply-demand ratio”, and sub­ Orange Administrative Committee held the respective classes of industrial and stitute therefor, in both instances, the an open meeting on July 28, 1955, after commercial activity specified in, a mar­ words “adjusted supply-demand ratio”. giving due notice thereof, to consider keting agreement upon which a hearing 2. In § 907.51 (a) delete the words “3 supply and market conditions for Va­ has been held. cents”, and substitute the words “2 lencia oranges and the need for regula­ (b) Additional findings. It is hereby cents”. tion; interested persons were afforded an found and determined that good cause 3. In § 907.51 (e) delete subparagraph opportunity to submit information and exists for making effective this order, (4) and substitute the following: views at this meeting; the recommenda­ amending the order, as amended, prior (4) If the current supply-demand tion and supporting information for reg­ to 30 days after publication in the F ed­ ratio is greater or less than the current ulation during the period specified herein eral R egister. This action is necessary supply-demand ratio computed by the was promptly submitted to the Depart­ in the public interest to reflect current market administrator during the third ment after such meeting was held; the marketing conditions. Accordingly, de­ delivery period immediately preceding, provisions of this section, including its lay in the effective date of this order add or subtract the difference, respec­ effective time, are identical with the to 30 days after publication, will seri­ tively, to or from the percentage com­ aforesaid recommendation of the com­ ously impair orderly marketing of milk puted pursuant to subparagraph (3) of mittee, and information concerning such in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin, marketing this paragraph. The result is the “ad­ provisions and effective time has been area. The provisions of the said amend­ justed supply-demand ratio”; and if the disseminated among handlers of such atory order are well known to handlers, current supply-demand ratio does not Valencia oranges; it is necessary, in or­ the public hearing having been held on differ from that computed during the der to effectuate the declared policy of June 15 and 16, 1955, a recommended third delivery period preceding, the cur­ the act, to make this section effective decision having been issued on July 7, rent supply-demand ratio shall be the, during the period herein specified; and 1955, and a final decision, on July 21, “adjusted supply-demand ratio”. compliance with this section will not re­ 1955. Reasonable time, under the cir­ quire any special preparation on the part cumstances, has been afforded persons (Sec. 5, 49 Stat. 753, as amended; 7 U. S. C. of persons subject thereto which cannot affected to prepare for its effective date. 608c) be completed on or before the effective Therefore, it would be impractible, un­ Issued at Washington, D. C., this 27th date hereof. necessary, and contrary to the public day of July to be effective on and after (b) Order. (1) The quantity of Va­ interest to delay the effective date of August 1, 1955. lencia oranges grown in Arizona and this amendatory order 30 days after its designated part of California which may publication in the F ederal R egister (see [ s e a l ] E arl L . B tjtz, Assistant Secretary. be handled during the period beginning section 4 (c), Administrative Procedure at 12:01 a. m., P. s. t., July 31, 1955, Act, 5 U. S. C. 1001 et seq.). [F. R. Doc. 55-6169; FUed, July 29, 1955; and ending at 12:01 a. m., P. s. t., August (c) Determination. It is hereby de­ 8:48 a. m.] 7, 1955, is hereby fixed as follows: termined that handlers (excluding co­ (1) District 1: Unlimited movement; operative associations of producers who (ii) District 2: 485,100 boxes; are not engaged in processing, distrib­ (iii) District 3: Unlimited movement. uting or shipping the milk covered by [Valencia Orange Reg. 47] (2) Valencia oranges handled pur­ this order amending the order, as Part 922—Valencia Oranges Grown in suant to the provisions of this section amended, which is marketed within the Arizona and Designated P art of Cali­ shall be subject to any size restrictions Milwaukee, Wisconsin, marketing area) fornia applicable thereto which have heretofore been issued on the handling of such of more than 50 percent of the milk LIMITATION OF HANDLING which is marketed within the said mar­ oranges and which are effective during § 922.347 Valencia Orange Regula­ the period specified herein. keting area, refused or failed to sign tion 47—(a) Findings. (1) Pursuant to (3) As used in this section, “han­ the proposed marketing agreement regu­ Order No. 22 (19 F. R. 1741), regulating dled,” “handler,” “boxes,” “District 1,” lating the handling of milk in the said the handling of Valencia oranges grown “District 2,” and “District 3,” shall have marketing area, and it is hereby further in Arizona and designated part of Cali­ the same meaning as when used in said determined that: fornia, effective March 31, 1954, under order. 5450 RULES AND REGULATIONS

(Sec. 5, 49 Stat. 753, as amended; 7 U. S. C. exists for making effective not later tively to or from the percentage com­ 608c) than August 1, 1955, this order amend­ puted pursuant to paragraph (c) of this Dated: July 29, 1955. ing the order, as amended. This action section. The result is the “adjusted is necessary in the public interest to re­ supply-demand ratio”; and if the current [seal] S. R. Smith, flect current marketing conditions. Ac­ supply-demand ratio does not differ Director, Fruit and Vegetable cordingly, any delay in the effective date from that computed during the third Division, Agricultural Mar­ of this order beyond the aforesaid date, delivery period preceding, the current keting Service. will seriously impair orderly marketing supply-demand ratio shall be the “ad­ [F. R. Doc. 55-6231; Filed, July 29, 1955; of milk in the Chicago, Illinois, market­ justed supply-demand ratio.” 11:29 a. m.] ing area. The provisions of the said 2. Amend i 941.52 (a)- (1) by deleting amendatory order are well known to the words “current supply-demand handlers, the public hearing having been held on May 9 and 10, 1955, a recom­ ratio” -and the words- “supply-demand [Docket No. AO-101-A19] ratio”, and substitute therefor in both mended decision having been issued on instances the words “adjusted supply, P art 941—Milk in Chicago, III., June 29, 1955 (20 F. R. 4688), and a demand ratio.” Marketing Area final decision having been issued on 3. In § 941.52 (a) (1) delete the words July 20, 1955. Reasonable time under ORDER AMENDING THE ORDER, AS AMENDED, “3 cents” and substitute the words the circumstances has been afforded per­ “2 cents.” REGULATING HANDLING sons affected to prepare for its effective § 941.0 Findings and determinations. date. Therefore, it would be imprac­ (Sec. 5, 49 Stat. 753, as amended; 7 U.,S. C. The findings and determinations here­ ticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the 608c) inafter set forth are supplementary and public interest to delay the effective date Issued at Washington, D. C., this 27th in addition to the findings and determi­ of this amendatory order 30 days after day of July to be effective on and after nations previously made in connection its publication in the F ed e r a l R e g ist e r the 1st day of August 1955. with the issuance of the aforesaid order (see section 4 (c), Administrative Pro­ and each of the previously issued amend­ cedure Act, 5 U. S. C. 1001 et seq.). [ s e a l ] E arl L. B u t z , ments thereto; and all previous findings (c) Determination. It is hereby de­ Assistant Secretary. and determinations are hereby ratified termined that handlers (excluding co­ [F. R. Doc. 55-6168; Filed, July 29, 1955; and affirmed, except insofar as such find­ operative associations of producers who 8:48 a. m.] ings and determinations may be in con­ are not engaged in processing, distrib­ flict with the findings and determina­ uting or shipping the milk covered by tions set forth herein. this order amending the order, as (a) Findings upon the basis of theamended, which is marketed within the [Lemon Reg. 600] hearing record. Pursuant to the provi­ Chicago, Illinois, marketing area) of sions of the Agricultural Marketing Part 953-—Lemons G rown in C alifornia more than 50 percent of the milk which and Arizona Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 is marketed within the said marketing U. S. C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable area, refused or failed to sign the pro­ LIMITATIONS OF SHIPMENTS rules of practice and procedure govern­ posed marketing agreement regulating § 953.707 Lemon Regulation 600—(a) ing the formulation of marketing agree­ the handling of milk in the said market­ Findings. (1) Pursuant to the market­ ments and orders (7 CPR Part 900), a ing area, and it is hereby further ing agreement, as amended, and Order public hearing was held at Chicago, Illi­ determined that: Nq. 53, as amended (7 CFR Part 953; nois,'May 9 and 10, 1955, upon pro­ (1) The refusal or failure of such 19 F. R. 7175; 20 F. R. 2913), regulating posed amendments to the tentative handlers to sign said proposed market­ the handling of lemons grown in the marketing agreement and to the order, ing agreement tends to prevent the State of California or in the State of as amended, regulating the handling of effectuation of the declared policy of the Arizona, effective under the applicable milk in the Chicago, Illinois, marketing act; provisions of the Agricultural Marketing area. Upon the basis of the evidence (2) The issuance of this order amend­ Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 introduced at such hearing and the rec­ ing the order, as amended, is the only U. S. C. 601 et seq.), and upon the basis ord thereof, it is hereby found that: practical means pursuant to the de­ of the recommendation and information (1) The said order, as amended, and clared policy of the act of advancing the submitted by the Lemon Administrative as hereby further amended, and all of interests of producers of milk which is Committee, established under the said the terms and conditions of said order, produced for sale in the said marketing amended marketing agreement and as amended, and as hereby further area; and order, and upon other available infor­ amended, will tend to effectuate the de­ (3) The issuance of this order amend­ mation, it is hereby found that the lim­ clared policy of the act; ing the order is approved or favored by itation of the quantity of such lemons (2) The parity prices of milk produced at least two-thirds of the producers who which may be handled, as hereinafter for sale in said marketing area as de­ during the determined representative provided, will tend to effectuate the de­ termined pursuant to section 2 of the period (March 1955) were engaged in clared policy of the act. act are not reasonable in view of the the production of milk for sale in the (2) It is hereby further found that it price of feeds, available supplies of said marketing area. is impracticable and contrary to the pub­ feeds, and other economic conditions lic interest to give preliminary notice, which affect market supply and demand Order relative to handling. It is therefore ordered, that on and after the engage in public rule-making procedure, for such milk, and the minimum prices and postpone the effective date of this specified in the order, as amended, and effective date hereof the handling of milk in the Chicago, Illinois, marketing section until 30 days after publication as hereby further amended, are such thereof in the F ederal R egister (60 Stat. prices as will reflect the aforesaid fac­ area shall be in conformity to and in compliance with the terms and condi­ 237; 5 U. S. C. 1001 et seq.) because the tors, insure a sufficient quantity of pure time intervening between the date when and wholesome milk, and be in the pub­ tions of the aforesaid order, as amended, and as hereby further amended, and the information upon which this section is lic interest; and based became available and the time (3) The said order, as amended, and aforesaid order, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows: when this section must become effective as hereby further amended, regulates in order to effectuate the declared policy the handling of milk in the same man­ 1. Amend § 941.51 by adding para­ graph (d) as follows: of the act is insufficient, and a reasonable ner as, and is applicable only to persons time is permitted, under the circum­ in the respective classes of industrial and (d) If the current supply-demand stances, for preparation for such effec­ commercial activity specified in, a mar­ ratio is greater'or less than the current tive time; and good cause exists for mak­ keting agreement upon which a hearing supply-demand ratio computed by the ing the provisions hereof effective as has been held. market administrator during the third hereinafter set forth. Shipments of • (b) Additional findings. It is hereby delivery period immediately preceding, lemons, grown in the State of California found and determined that good cause add or subtract the difference respec­ or in the State of Arizona, are currently Saturday y July SO, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 5451 subject to regulation pursuant to said Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 this order amending the order, as amend­ amended marketing agreement and or­ U. S. C. 601 et seq.), and the appli­ ed, which is marketed within the South der; the recommendation and support­ cable rules of practice and procedure Bend-La Porte, Indiana, marketing area) ing information for regulation during governing the formulation of marketing of more than 50 percent of the milk the period specified herein was promptly agreements and orders (7 CFRPart 900), which is marketed within the said mar­ submitted to the Department after an a public hearing was held at South Bend, keting area, refused or failed to sign the open meeting of the Lemon Administra­ Indiana, on June 13,1955 upon proposed proposed marketing agreement regulat­ tive Committee on July 27, 1955, such amendments to the tentative marketing ing the handling of milk in the said mar­ meeting was held, after giving due no­ agreement and to the order, as amended, keting area, and it is hereby further tice thereof to consider recommenda­ regulating the handling of milk in the determined that: tions for regulation, and interested South Bend-La Porte, Indiana, market­ (1) The refusal or failure of such persons were afforded an opportunity to ing area. Upon the basis of the evidence handlers to sign said proposed market­ submit their views at this meeting; the introduced at such hearing and the rec­ ing agreement tends to prevent the effec­ provisions of this section, including its ord thereof, it is hereby found that: tuation of the declared policy of the act; effective time, are identical with the (1*) The said order, as amended, and (2) The issuance of this order amend­ aforesaid recommendation of the com­ as hereby further amended, and all the ing the order, as amended, is the only mittee, and information concerning such terms and conditions of said order, as practical means pursuant to the declared provisions and effective time has been amended, and as hereby further policy of the act of advancing the inter­ disseminated among handlers of such amended, will tend to effectuate the de­ ests of producers of milk which is pro­ lemons; it is necessary, in order to effec­ clared policy of the act; duced for sale in the said marketing tuate the declared policy of the act, to (2) The parity prices of milk pro­ area; and make this section effective during the duced for sale in said marketing area as (3) The issuance of this order amend­ period hereinafter specified; and com­ determined pursuant to section 2 of the ing the order is approved or favored by at pliance with this section will not require act are not reasonable in view of the least two-thirds of the producers who any special preparation on the part of price of feeds, available supplies of during the determined representative persons subject thereto which cannot be feeds, and other economic conditions period (May, 1955) were engaged in the completed by the effective time thereof. which affect market supply and demand production of milk for sale in the said (b) Order. (1) The quantity of for such milk and the minimum prices marketing area. lemons grown in the State of California specified in the order, as amended, and Order relative to handling. It is or in the State of Arizona which may as hereby further amended, are such therefore ordered, that on and after the be handled during the period beginning prices as will reflect the aforesaid fac­ effective date hereof the handling of at 12:01 a. m., P. s. t., July 31, 1955, and tors, insure a sufficient quantity of pure milk in the South Bend-La Porte, Indi-, ending at 12:01 a. m., P. s. t., August 7, and wholesome milk, and be in the ana, marketing area shall be in con­ 1955, is hereby fixed as follows: public interest; and formity to and in compliance with the (1) District 1: Unlimited movement; (3) The said order,' as amended, and terms and conditions of the aforesaid (ii) District 2: 450 carloads; as hereby further amended, regulates order, as amended, and as hereby fur­ (iii) District 3: Unlimited movement. the handling of milk in the same man­ ther amended, and the aforesaid order, (2) As used in this section, “handled,” ner as, and is applicable only to persons as amended, is hereby further amended “carloads,” “District 1,” “District 2,” and in the respective classes of industrial as follows: “District 3” shall have the same meaning and commercial activity specified in, a 1. In § 967.51 (a) delete the words as when used in the said amended mar­ marketing agreement upon which a “current supply-demand ratio” and the keting agreement and order. hearing has been held. words “supply-demand ratio” and sub­ (Sec. 5, 49 Stat. 753, as amended; 7 U. S. C. (b) Additional findings. It is hereby stitute therefor in both instances the 608c) found and determined that good cause words “adjusted supply-demand ratio”. exists for making effective not later than Dated: July 28,1955. 2. In § 967.51 (a) delete the words “3 August 1, 1955, this order amending the cents” and substitute the words “2 [seal] S. R. Smith, order, as amended. This action is nec­ cents”. Director, Fruit and Vegetable essary in the public interest to reflect 3. In § 967.51 (d) delete subparagraph Division, Agricultural Mar­ current marketing conditions. Accord­ (4) and substitute a new subparagraph keting Service. ingly, any delay in the effective date of (4) as follows: this order beyond the aforesaid date, 'IF. R. Doc. 55-6213; Piled, July 29, 1955; will seriously impair orderly marketing (4) If the current supply-demand ra­ 8:56 a. m.] of milk in the South Bend-La Porte, tio is greater or less than the current Indiana, marketing area. The provi­ supply-demand ratio computed by the sions of the said amendatory order are market administrator during the third [Docket No.- AO-170-A9] well known to handlers, the public hear­ delivery period immediately preceding, ing having been held on June 13,1955, a add or subtract the difference, respec­ Part 967—Milk in South Bend-La recommended decision having been tively, to or from the percentage com­ P orte, I nd., Marketing Area issued on July 12, 1955, and a final deci-, puted pursuant to subparagraph (3) of sion having been issued on July 27,1955.1 this paragraph. The result is the “ad­ ORDER AMENDING ORDER, AS AMENDED, Reasonable time under the circum­ REGULATING HANDLING justed supply-demand ratio” ; and if the stances has been afforded persons af­ current supply-demand ratio does not § 967.0 Findings and determinations. fected to prepare for its effective date. The findings and determinations herein­ Therefore, it would be impracticable, differ from that computed during the after set forth arersupplementary and in unnecessary and contrary to the public third delivery period preceding, the cur­ addition to the findings and determina­ interest to delay the effective date of rent supply-demand ratio shall be the tions previously made in connection with this amendatory order 30 days after its “adjusted supply-demand ratio”. the issuance of the aforesaid order and publication in the F ederal R egister (Sec. 5, 49 Stat. 753, as amended; 7 U. S. C. each of the previously issued amend­ (see section 4 (c) , Administrative Pro­ 608c) ments thereto; and all previous findings cedure Act, 5 U. S. C. 1001 et seq.). and determinations are hereby ratified (c) Determination. ■ It is hereby de­ Issued at Washington, D. C., this 28th and affirmed, except insofar as such termined that handlers (excluding co­ day of July 1955, to be effective on and findings and determinations may be in operative associations of producers who after the 1st day of August 1955. conflict with the findings and determi­ are not engaged in processing, distrib­ [seal] T rue D. Morse, nations set forth herein. uting or shipping the milk covered by Acting Secretary. (a) Findings upon the basis of the hearing record. Pursuant to the provi­ »See F. R. Doc. 55-6171 in Propœed Rule [F. R. Doc. 55-6216; Filed, July 29, 1955; sions of the Agricultural Marketing Making Section, in fra. 8:50 a. m.] TITLE 14—CIVIL AVIATION g Cl Chapter II— Civil Aeronautics Administration, Department of Commerce [Arndt. 153] P art 609—Standard I nstrument Approach Procedures x PROCEDURE ALTERATIONS The standard instrument approach procedure alterations appearing hereinafter are adopted to become effective when indicated in order to promote safety. Compliance with the notice, procedures, and effective date provisions of section 4 of the Administrative Procedure Act would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest, and therefore is not required. Part 609 is amended as follows: N o te: Where the general classification (LFR, VAR, ADF, ILS, OCA, or VOR), location, and procedure number (if any) of any procedure in the amendments which follow, are Identical with an existing procedure, that procedure is to be substituted for the existing one, as of the effective date given, to the extent that it differs from the existing procedure; where a procedure is canceled, the existing procedure is revoked; new procedures are to be placed in appropriate alphabetical sequence within the section amended. 1. The low frequency range procedures prescribed in § 609.6 are amended to read in part:

LFR Standard Instrument A pproach P rocedure Bearings, headings, and courses are magnetic. Distances are In statute miles unless otherwise Indicated. Élévations and altitudes are in feet, MSL. Ceilings are In feet above airport elevation. If an LFR instrument approach is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure authorized by the Administrator for Civil Aeronautics for such airport. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitude(s) shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Celling and visibility minimums REGULATIONS AND RULES Minimum City and State; airport' name, Procedure turn (—) side of altitude over Course and If visual contact not established at author­ elevation; facility: class and Initial approach to facility Course Minimum final app roach course facility on distance, Type aircraft ized landing minimums after passing Identification; procedure No.; from— and dis­ altitude (outbound and inbound); final approach facility to facility within distance specified, or if effective date tance (ft.) altitudes; limiting dis­ course (ft.) airport Condition landing not accomplished tances 75 m . p. h. More than or less 75 m. p. b.

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

ALEXANDRIA, MINN. Alexandria VOR. 233—8.5 2,600 W side N course: 2,100 186—2.4 2 engines or less Within 2.4 miles climb to 2,600' on S course Municipal Airport, 1,425'. 006° outbound. T-dn 300-1 300-1 (186°) within 10 miles. This procedure BMLZ-VDT-AXN. 186° inbound. C-d 600-1n 600-1)4 not approved for AD F approach. Procedure No. 1. 2,600' within 10 miles. C-n 600-2 600-2 Caution: Tank 1,585' MSL located to left Amendment No. 6. S-d 600-1)4 600-2 of course after passing low cone: Radio Effective date: August 27,1955 S-n 600-2 600-2 tower 1,573' located In miles SW of LFR. Supersedes No. 5, dated A-dn 800-2 800-2 Radio tower 1,565' MSL located 1 mile E August 15,1953. of airport. Major changes: (1) Frequency Moi e than 2 eng nes deleted Item 1; (2) MEA all T-dn 200-)4 directions deleted. Transi­ C-d 600-i)4 tion added from VOR; (3) C-n 600-2 Item 5 distance revised to 10 S-d 600-1)4 miles in accordance with S-n 600-2 criteria; (4) New format used. A-dn 800-2

ATTU, ALASKA. PROCEDURE CANCELED AUGUST 1, 1955. (FIELD CLOSED TO ALL CIVIL AIRCRAFT EXCEPT IN EMERGENCIES OR WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF UNITED Casco Cove, 40'. STATES NAVY.) SRAW-NU-2. Procedure No. 1. Amendment 3. Effective date: May 19,1954.

FORT WAYNE, IND. Fort Wayne VÖR. 172—7.0 2,200 S side of course: . 1,500 051—3.5 2 engines or less Within 3.5 miles, climb to 2,300' on NE Baer Field, 801'. 231° outbound. T-dn 300-1 300-1 course of FWA-LFR. SBMRLZ-DTV-FWA. Markle FM (final). 051—10.0 1,500 051° inbound. C-dn 400-1 500-1 Procedure No. 1. 2,000' within 10 miles. S-dn 4 400-1 400-1 Amendment No. 7. Super­ A-dn 800-2 800-2 sedes No. 6, dated February 18, 1954. More than 2 engines Effective date: August 27,1955. T-dn ...... 200-M Major changes: (1) Item 5 dis­ C-dn ...... 500-1)4 tance revised to 10 miles in 8-dn 4 ...... 400-1 accordance with policy; (2) A-dn ______800-2 new format used. audy Jl 3, 1955 30, July Saturday, L F R St a n d a r d I n s t r u m e n t A ppr o a ch P r o c e d u r e —C ontinued

Ceiling and visibility minimums Procedure turn (—) side ol Minimum If visual contact not established at author* City and State; airport name, Course and Course Minimum final app roach course altitude over distance, Type aircraft ized landing minimums after passing elevation; facility: class and Initial approach to facility and dis­ altitude (outbound and inbound); facility on facility within distance specified, or if Identification; procedure No.; from— facility to tance (ft.) altitudes; limiting dis­ final approach airport Condition landing not accomplished effective date tances course (ft.) 75 m. p. h. More than or less 75 m. p. h.

1 2 3 4 5 6 10

N side of N E course: 800 184—2.4 2 engines or less Within 2.4 miles, climb to 1,400' on SW KENAI, ALASKA 300-1 course (184°) within 25 miles. Kenai Airport, 93'. 004° outbound. T-dn 300-1 SB RAZ-VPDT-ENA. 184° inbound. C-dn 600-1 500-1 1,400' within 10 miles. 5453 S-dn 18 400-1 400-1 FEDERAL REGISTER Procedure No. 1. 800-2 800-2 Amendment No. 7. A-dn Effective date: August 27, More than 2 engines 1955. Supersedes Amendment No. T-dn 200-)4 6, dated August 13, 1955. C-dn 500-1)4 Major changes: To correct dis­ S-dn 18 400-1 tance, columns 7 and 11, A-dn 800-2 from 2<1 miles to 2.4 miles. Within 2.3 miles climb to 1,300' on S course MELBOURNE, FLA. W side N course: 700 158—2.3 2 engines or less Melboume-Eau Qallie, 26'. 338° outbound. T-dn 300-1 300-1 within 25 miles. SBRAZ-MLB. 158° inbound. C-dn 400-1 600-1 Procedure No. 1. 1,200' within 10 miles. S-dn 16 400-1 400-1 Amendment 7. A-dn 800-2 800-2 Effective: August 27, 1955. Supersedes Amendment M-6,' More than 2 engines January 12,1954. T-dn 20044 C-dn 500-1)4 Major changes: New ormat. S-dn 16 400-1 A-dn 800-2 Within 2.6 miles, climb to 2,800' on N course ROCHESTER, MINN. Rochester VOR------069—4.3 2,400 E side of course: 1,900 350-2.6 2 engines or less 170° outbound. T-dn 300-1 300-1 or if directed by ATC, make left climbing Lobb Field, 1.041'. turn to 2,800'; proceed out W course RST- 8BMRLZ-VDT-RST. Stewartville FM (final)------350—7.8 1,900 350° inbound. C-dn 500-1 600-1 2,400' within 10 miles. S-dn 35 600-1 500-1 LFR within 25 miles. Procedure No. 1. A-dn 800-2 800-2 Air Carrier N ote: Sliding scale n o t Amendment No. 9. authorized. Effective date: August 27, More than 2 engines 1955. T-dn 200-14 Supersedes No. 8, dated No­ 600-1)4 vember 20,1953. C-dn Major changes: (1) Airport S-dn 35 500-1 name revised; (2) Item 5 re­ A-dn 800-2 vised to delete distance be­ yond 10 miles; (3) format revised in accordance with policy. If visual contact not established on final ap­ YAKATAGA, ALASKA. South Yakataga Intersec- 326—18 3,500 E side S course: See col. 11 146-0.4 2 engines or less 146° outbound. T-dn 300-1 300-1 proach at authorized landing minimums Yakataga Airport, 12'. section. 10 miles South of Yakataga LF R or 8 miles BMRLZ-PDVT-CYT. 326° inbound. C-dn 600-1 500-1 A-dn 800-2 800-2 after passing South Yakataga Intersection Procedure No. 1. South Yakataga Intersec­ 326 1,000 1,000' within 10 miles. tion (final). See ol. 11 climb to 3,500' on S course (146°) to South Amendment No. 6. More than 2 engines Yakataga Intersection. This procedure Effective date: August 27,1955. T-dn 200-54 not authorized fo.r ADF approach. Supersedes Amendment No. C-dn 600-1)4 Caution: All maneuvering must be con­ M-5, dated June 30,1954. A-dn 800-2 fined to area S of airport. High terrain N Major changes: (1) New for­ through E. Hill 2,258' mean sea level 4.1 mat; (2) Final approach and miles E of, range station. altitude over South Yaka­ taga Intersection added; (3) Procedure turn changed to standard in accordance with criteria.

¡É 2. The very high frequency omnirange procedures prescribed in § 609.9 (a) are amended to read in part: 5454

VOR Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure Bearings, headings, and courses are magnetic. Distances are in statute miles unless otherwise indicated. Elevations and altitudes are in feet, MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. * VOR instrument approach is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure autnonzed by the Administrator for Civil Aeronautics for such airport. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitude(s) shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area

Ceiling and visibility minimums Minimum City and State; airport name, Procedure turn (—) side of Course Minimum altitude Course and If visual contact not established at author­ elevation; facility; class and Initial approach to facility final approach course over facility distance, Type aircraft ized landing minimums after passing fa­ identification; procedure No.; from— and altitude (outbound and inbound); distance on final facility to cility within distance specified, or if land­ effective date (ft.) altitudes; limiting dis­ approach. airport Condition ing not accomplished tances course (ft.) 75 m. p. h. More than or less 75 m. p. h.

10

ALEXANDRIA, MINN. Alexandria L FR . 53—8.5 2,800 N side of course: 2,000 223-9.6 2 engines or less Within 9.8 miles, climb to 2,800' within 25 Municipal. 1,425'. 043° outbound. T-dn 300-1 300-1 miles make left turn and return to VOR BVOR-AXN. 223° inbound. C-dn 600-2 600-2 STN. Procedure No. 1. 2,800' within 10 miles. S-dn 600-2 600-2 Caution: Tank 1,585' mean sea level Effective date: August 27,1955. A-dn 800-2 800-2 located 1 mile N of airport. Radio tower Amendment No. 3. 1,573' mean sea level located 1)4 miles Supersedes No. 2, dated Au­ More than 2 engines NW of airport. Radio tower 1,555' mean gust 15,1953. T-dn 200-)4 sea level located 1 mile E of airport. Major changes: (1) Frequency C-dn 600-2 deleted item 1; (2) MEA all 600-2

S-dn REGULATIONS AND RULES directions deleted; (3) item A-dn 800-2 5 distance revised to 10 miles in accordance with criteria; (4) new format used. FORT WAYNE, IND. Ft. Wayne L FR . 352—7.0 2,200 W side of course: 1,500 137—5.7 2 engines or less Within 5.7 miles, climb to 2,200' on course of Baer Field, 801'. 317° outbound. T-dn 300-1 300-1 137° magnetic within 25 miles, or if di BVOR-FWA. Intersection NW course 137—23.0 1,600 137° inbound. C-dn 400-1 500-1 rected by ATC, make right climbing turn, Procedure No. 1. FWA L FR , and 137° final 2,200' within 10 miles. S-dn 13 400-1 400-1 climb to 2,200' and return to Fort Wayne Amendment No. 3. course to FWA-VOR. A-dn 800-2 800-2 VOR. Effective date: August 27,1955. Caution: Tower 1,595' mean sea level Supersedes No. 2, dated Jan­ Intersection NE course 245—25.0 2,600 More than 2 engines located 7 miles NW of airport. Tower uary 14, 1954. FWA LFR and 245° T-dn 200-34 1,172' mean sea level located 7)4 miles W Major changes: (1) Item 5 dis­ course to FWA-VOR. C-dn 500-1)4 of airport. Sectional charts list other tance and altitude revised S-dn 13 400-1 towers in vicinity. due to 1,172' mean sea level A-dn 800-2 tower 7.5 miles W of air­ port; (2) item 6 revised in ac­ cordance with policy; (3) Item 7 and 11 distances revised to agree with C and Q.

LA CROSSE, WIS. W side of course: LSE-LFR 141—5.0 from 2 engines or less Within 4 miles of LSE LFR make climbing Municipal 653'. 321° outbound. 1,900 final LSE-LFR T-d 400-1 400-1 right turn climb NW to 2,500' on BVOR-LSE. 141° inbound. T-n 400-1)4 400-1)4 321° radial before returning to LSE-VOR Procedure No. 2. 2,400' within 10 miles of C-d 600-1 600-1 or if directed by ATC hold at LFR and Amendment No.: Original. LSE LFR. C-n 600-2 600-2 a point 2 minutes NW on 321° radial Effective date: August 27,1955. S-d 13 400-1)4 400-1)4 LSE-VOR. Supersedes: None. S-n 13 400-2 400-2 Caution: Tower 950' mean sea level 2.2 miles Major changes: None. A-dn 800-2 800-2 SE of airport and tower 1,444' mean sea level atop hill 5 miles SE of airport. More than 2„engines T-d 400-1 T-n 400-1)4 C-d 600-1)4 C-n 600-2 S-d 13 400-1)4 S-n 13 400-2 A-dn 800-2 audy Jl 3, 1955 30, July Saturday, V OK S t a n d a r d I n s t r u m e n t A ppr o a ch P r o c e d u r e —C ontinued

Celling and visibility minimums Minimum City and State: airport name, Procedure turn (—) side of altitude Course and If visual contact not established at author­ Initial approach to facility Course Minimum final approach course Type aircraft ized landing minimums after passing fa­ elevation; facility: class and and altitude (outbound and inbound); over facility distance, identification; procedure No.; from— altitudes; limiting dis­ on final facility to cility within distance specified, or if land- effective date distance (ft.) approach airport Condition ing not accomplished tances course (ft.) 75 m. p. h. More than or less 75 m. p. h.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

ROCHESTER, MINN. Rochester L F R ...... 249—4.3 2,400 S side of course: 1,900 035—5.1 2 engines or le 3S Within 5.1 miles, climb to 2,800' on course Lobb Field, 1,041'. 215® outbound. T-dn 300-1 300-1 of 035° within 25 miles of RST-VOR. BVOR-RST. 035° inbound. C-dn 600-1 600-1 Air Carrier N ote: Sliding scale not au­

Procedure No. L 2,400' within 10 miles. 5455 A-dn 800-2 800-2 thorized. FEDERAL REGISTER Amendment No. 4. Effective date: August 27,1955. Mo *e than 2 eng nes Supersedes No. 3, Dated No­ T-dn 2004$ vember 23,1953. C-dn 600-1)$ Major changes: (1) Airport A-dn 800-2 name revised; (2) item 5 re­ vised to delete distance be­ yond 10 miles; (3) format re­ vised in accordance with policy; (4) air carrier note added to be the same as 611.1.

3. The Instrument landing system procedures prescribed in § 609.11 are amended to read in part:

ILS Standard Instrument Approach P rocedure Bearings, headings, and courses are magnetic. Distances are in statute miles unless otherwise indicated. Elevations and altitudes are in feet, MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. If an ILS instrument approach is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure authorized by the Administrator for Civil Aeronautics for such airport. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitude(s) shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below: a .

Transition to ILS Altitude of glide slope Ceiling and visibility minimums Procedure turn and distance to ap­ City and State; airport (—) side of final Minimum alti­ proach end of runway If visual contact not established name, elevation; facility: approach course tude at glide at— Type aircraft slope intercep­ upon descent to authorized land­ class and identification; Course Mini­ (outbound and ing minimhms or if landing not procedure No.; effective mum al­ inbound); alti­ tion inbound From— T o - and dis* tudes; limiting Condition More accomplished date tance titudes , (it.) Middle 75m.p.h. (ft.) distances Outer marker than 75 marker or less m. p. h.

1 2 7 8 9 10 11 13

GREAT FALLS, MONT. GTF-LFR ...... LOM 154—6.0 5.700 W s id e o' ILS 5,700 6,700-7.4 3,900-0.6 2 engines or less Within 7.4 miles after passing Great Falls, 3,671'. course:* T-dn 300-1 300-1 LOM (ADF) climb to 6,000' on ILS— GTF. GTF-VOR...... LOM. 144—6.0 5.700 161° outbound. A D F 5,000 C-D 500-1 500-1 back course GTF-ILS or on 341° LOM-GT. 341° inbound. over LOM C-N 500-1)4 600-1)4 outbound track LOM within 25 Combination ILS- Belt F M ...... LOM. 253—20.0 5.700 6,700' within 5 miles; alternate missed approach ADF. miles. S-dn 34 when directed by ATC climb to Procedure No. 1. Cas&de FM (final. LOM. 041—16.0 5.700 6,000' within 10 ILS 30044 30044 6,000' on NW course GTF-LFR, Amendment No. 2. miles. or on 312° outbound course. Effective date: August Not authorized ADF 600-1 600-1 ' GTF-VOR within 15 miles. 27,1955. b e y o n d 10 •Procedure turn on W side for more Supersedes Amendment miles. A-dn favorable terrain. No. 1, dated March 10 ILS 600-2 600-2 C aution: 3,840' mean sea level 1954. LFR towers 1.5 miles SW of Major changes: New for­ ADF 800-2 800-2 airport. mat; minor course and •*300-1 required for runways 11/29. distance corrections; More than 2 eng nes two-engine takeoff T-dn **200-)4 minimums changed C-dn 500-1)4 to 300-1 to comply with criteria. S-dn 34 ILS 30044 ADF 500-1 A-dn ILS 600-2 ADF 800-2 5456 5456 ILS Standard Instrument Approach P rocedure—Continued

Transition to ILS Altitude of glide slope Ceiling and visibility minimums Procedure turn and distance to ap­ City and State; airport (—) side of final Minimum alti­ proach end of runway If visual contact not established name, elevation; facility: approach course tude at glide at— Type aircraft class and identification; upon descent to authorized land, Course Mini- (outbound and slope intercep­ procedure No.; effective mum al­ inbound); alti­ tion inbound ing minimums or if landing not date From— To— and dis­ Condition accomplished tance titudes tudes; limiting (ft.) More (ft.) distances Outer Middle 75 m.p.h. than 75 marker marker or less m. p. h.

12 13

ST. JOSEPH, MO. St. Joseph VOR_ LOM.'. 169—20.0 2,300 E side S course: ILS—2,300 2,261—6.0 1,060-0.8 2 engines or less Within 6 miles (ADF) climb to Hosecrans Memorial, 172° outbound. •T-dn 300-1 300-1 2,400' on N course ILS within 25 821'. 352° inbound. ADF—1,800 C-d 500-1 700-1 miles. ILS-STJ. 2,300' within 10 C-n 500-1)$ 700-1)$ Caution: 400' bluffs W, NW, and LOM-ST. miles. E of airport. Procedure No. 1. Not authorized S-dn 35 #Straight-in ILS minimums au­ Combination ILS- b e y o n d 10 #ILS 200-)$ 200-)$ thorized under provisions of ADF. miles. inoperative ILS components are Amendment No. 10. ADF 400-1 400-1 applicable, except 400-1 required Effective date: August with glide slope inoperative. 27,1955. A-dn •Takeoff minimums no lower than Supersedes No. 9, dated ILS 600-2 700-2 300-1 authorized on runway 30. March 5,1955. Major changes: (1), Cor­ ADF 800-2 800-2 rects iteih 4 to agree with C and G. More than 2 engines *T-dn ...... 200-)$ REGULATIONSRULES AND C-dn ...... 700-1)$ S-dn 35 #ILS 200-)$ AD F 400-1 A-dn ILS 700-2 ADF 800-2

These procedures shall become effective on the dates indicated in Column 1 of the procedures. (Sec. 205, 52 Stat. 984, as amended; 49 U. S. C. 425. Interpret or apply sec. 601, 52 Stat. 1007, as amended; 49 U. S. C. 551)

[SEAL] F . B . L e e , Administrator of Civil Aeronautics. [F. R. Doc. 55-6001; Filed, July 29, 1955; 8:45 a. m.]

TITLE 32— NATIONAL DEFENSE (3) Loyalty oath. Applicants enroll­with the approval of the professor of DD Form 98 as a prerequisite to enroll­ ing in this course must execute the fol­ military science and tactics. A student ment. Chapter V— Department of the Army lowing loyalty oath: who has been denied enrollment by rea­ (ii) An applicant who refuses to sign son of refusing to execute the oath pre­ Subchapter E— Organized Reserves I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will DD Form 98 will be denied enrollment. support and defend the Constitution of the scribed in this subparagraph will not be Each applicant who qualifies his DD P art R e se r v e O f f ic e r s ’ T r a in in g 562— United States against all enemies, foreign or permitted to wear the ROTC uniform Form 98 by an entry of other than C o r p s domestic; that, I will bear true faith and nor will any appropriated funds be ex­ “None” or “None to my knowledge” in CONDITIONS FOR ENROLLMENT IN A SPECIFIC allegiance to the same; and that I take this pended for his support. the remarks section will be denied en­ obligation freely, without any mental reser­ COURSE (iii) These provisions will not be ret­rollment until such times as a full and vation or purpose of evasion; so help me God. roactive. Students currently enrolled complete investigation discloses that In § 562.22, a new subparagraph (3) (i) Any student who refuses to execute who have already executed DD Form 98 such action would not be prejudicial to is added to paragraph (a), and a new (Loyalty Certificate for Personnel of the the national interest. Students will be such loyalty oath will be denied formal Armed Forces) will not be required to subparagraph (3) is also added to para­ enrollment. advised to file their DD Forms 98 suffi­ graph (b) as follows: execute the oath prescribed in this sub- ciently in advance of the dates an­ (ii) Such students as may be required paragraph. nounced for formal enrollment to permit § 562.22 Conditions for enrollment in or permitted by educational institutions (b) For advanced course, senior di­such investigation if required. a specific course. * * * to undergo military training and who are vision. * * * * * * * * (a) For basic course, senior divi­not a c c e p t e d for formal enrollment may ( 3 ) Loyalty certificate, (i) Applicants [C4, AR 145-350, June 15, 1955] (R. S. 161; sion. * * * receive instruction in the basic course will be required to satisfactorily execute 5 U. S. C. 22. Interprets or applies 39 Stat. Saturday, July 30, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 5457

191, as amended, sec. 34, 41 Stat. 778; 10 TITLE 43— PUBLIC LANDS: powers and antenna heights for televi­ U. S. C. 354, 381-388, 441) sion stations presently specifies different INTERIOR [ s e a l ] J o h n A. K l e i n , requirements for stations in Zone I from Major General, U. S. Army. Chapter I— Bureau of Land Manage­ those specified for stations in other The Adjutant General. zones. The pertinent provisions of this ment, Department of the Interior section read as follows: [P. R. Doc. 55-6161; Piled, July 29, 1955; Appendix C— Public Land Orders 8:46 a. m.] (b) Maximum power. Except as pro­ [Public Land Order 1197] vided in subparagraph (1) of this para­ [Montana 014427] graph, the maximum effective radiated powers of television broadcast stations M ontana Subchapter F— Personnel operating on the channels set forth be­ reserving public lands in connection low with antenna heights not in excess P art R e c r u it in g a n d E n l i s t m e n t s 571— W ITH THE BULL MOUNTAIN GAME REFUGE of 2,000 feet above average terrain shall qualifications f o r e n l is t m e n t be as follows: By virtue of the authority vested in the Maximum visual In § 571.2, paragraphs (e) (1) and (f) President and pursuant to Executive effective radiated power (5) (i) television Station WBEN-TV, temporary promotion on date of enlist­ This order shall take precedence over operating on Channel 4 at Buffalo, New ment to grade E-4 or higher may enlist but not otherwise affect the Depart­ York, and WSAZ, Inc., licensee of tele­ without regard to the above restrictions. mental order of November 3,1936, estab­ vision Station WSAZ-TV, operating on (iv) Personnel enlisting on the day lishing Montana Grazing District No. 5. Channel 3 at Huntington, West Virginia, following separation from active duty in request that § 3.614 (b) be amended so as O rme Lew is, to delete paragraph (b) (1) and to revise the Army may enlist without regard to Assistant Secretary of the Interior. paragraph (b) (2) to read as follows: the above restrictions. (v) For applicants who do not meet J uly 26, 1955. (2) In all zones, the maximum powers these requirements, major commanders [F. R. Doc. 55-6163; Filed, July 29, 1955; which may be used by television broad­ may grant waivers in especially meri­ 8:47 a. m.] cast stations operating on the respective channels set forth in the above table torious cases of personnel with long pe­ with antenna heights exceeding 2,000 riods of honorable active service (6 years TITLE 47— TELECOMMUNI­ feet above average terrain shall be based or more). on the chart designated as Appendix *. * .* * * CATION HI, Figure 2b.1 (f) Classes ineligible for enlistment Chapter I— Federal Communications Thus, the petitioners seek to amend unless waiver is granted. * * * Commission the rule to remove the present restriction (5) Men with civil records, (i) * * * [Docket No. 11181; FCC 55-802] on power and height requirements in (c> Minor offenses. Men with records Zone I and to make the power-height of minor offenses may be granted waiv­ [Rules Arndt. 3-52] compensation formula the same for all ers for enlistment by recruiting main P art 3—R adio B roadcast S ervices zones. station commanders. These offenses in­ 4. Comments in support of the peti­ clude minor traffic violations and single television broadcast stations tions were filed by petitioners WBEN, cases of drunkenness, vagrancy, truancy, 1. The Commission has under con­ Inc., and WSAZ, Inc., and by Sarkes Peace disturbance, etc., for which no sideration its Notice of Proposed Rule Tarzian, Inc., and William E. Benns, Jr. civil restraint exists. Making issued on September 23, 1954 Oppositions were filed by Triangle Publi­ ***** (FCC 54-1211), and published in the cations, Inc. (WFIL-TV), Philadelphia, Pa.; General Teleradio, Inc. (WORr-TV), [C2, AR 615-120, 18 June 1955] (R. S. 161; F ed e r a l R e g is t e r on September 29, 1954 5 U. S. C. 22) (19 *F. R. 6276), proposing to amend New York; Evening News Association section 3.614 (b) of the Commission’s (WWJ-TV), Detroit, Michigan; Joe L. [s e a l ] J o h n A . K l e i n , Rules and Regulations in response to Smith, Jr., Inc. (WKNA-TV), Charles- Major General, U. S. Army, petitions filed by WBEN, Inc. and The Adjutant General. WSAZ, Inc. * Figure 2 (a) would be eliminated and IP. R. Doc. 55-6162; Piled, July 29, 1955; 2. Section 3.614 (b) of the Rules per­ figure 2 (b) would be relabeled to apply to 13:47 a. m.l taining to the maximum authorized a ll z o n e s. 5458 RULES AND REGULATIONS ton, West Virginia; WGR Corporation amendment urge that the proposal would others in a similar situation to obtain the (WGR—TV), Buffalo, New York; WCAU, result in improved television service to necessary improvement in their service Inc. (WCAU-TV)', Philadelphia, Pa.; the public in that it would increase the by the addition of the following provision Elm City Broadcasting Corp., (WNHC- potential service areas of all stations and to § 3.614 (b) (1): “This limitation shall TV), New Haven, Conn.; John H. Mul- would increase the signal strength not apply to any licensee or permittee in laney, Washington, D. C.; Greylock throughout the entire service areas of Zone 1 who received an authorization Broadcasting Co., (WMGT-TV) , Adams, the stations. The primary basis for this prior to April 14, 1952, to construct a Mass.; Helm Coal Company, (WNOW- contention is contained in an engineer­ tower and antenna to a height in excess TV), York, Pa.; Neenah-Menasha ing study prepared by WBEN which pur­ of 1,900 feet above average terrain. In Broadcasting Co., (WNAM-TV), Neenah, ports to show that the total available such case, maximum power may be Wise.; Plains Television Corp., (WISC- service in Zone I from all existing sta­ utilized at the height above average ter­ TV), Springfield, Illinois; Rossmoyne tions and assignments would increase in rain specified in the authorization. The Corp., (WCMB-TV), Harrisburg, Pa.; the event all stations were to operate limitation shall apply, however, where Salisbury Broadcasting Corp., (WWOR- with antenna heights up to 2,000 feet the tower or other principal supporting TV), Worcester, Mass.; Southern Con­ without the power reductions now re­ structure had been constructed prior to necticut & Long Island Television Co., quired by the present Rule. For exam­ the date of such authorization.” Inc. (WICC-TV), Bridgeport, Conn.; ple, it is alleged that the total service 8. In support of its request for sp ecia l Springfield T e lev isio n Broadcasting area of all the Channel 2 stations in Zone relief, WBEN submits the results o f a Corp., (WWLP-TV), Springfield, Mass.; 1, assuming operation with 100 kw and measurement survey in various com­ Telecasting, Inc., (WENS-TV), Pitts­ 500 feet, would be 66,627 square miles as munities in the southwestern portion of burgh, Pa.; New Britain Broadcasting against 130,892 square miles for antenna New York State and in the northwestern Co., (WKNB-TV), New Britain-Hart- heights of 2,000 feet, an increase of 96.5 portion of Pennsylvania. WBEN states ford, Conn.; South Bend Tribune, percent. Similarly, it is alleged that, on that in this area many people live in (WSBT-TV), South Bend, Indiana; The the basis of two stations operating at valleys and that the area is one in w hich Journal Company, (WTMJ-TV), Mil­ minimum, average, and maximum co­ it is expected that WBEN will provide waukee, Wise.; Tri-City Broadcasting channel and adjacent channel spacings the only television service. The results Co., (WTRF-TV), Wheeling, West Vir­ encountered in Zone 1, where one station of this measurement program, it is ginia; Robert R. Thomas, Jr., (WOAY- remains at a particular antenna height alleged, show that the field intensities TV) Oak Hill, West Virginia; WKNY-TV with maximum power and the other in­ provided at 50 percent or more o f the Corporation, (WKYN-TV), Kingston, creases its height up to 2,000 feet at locations measured were 12 db or more New York; WJAC, Inc., (WJAC-TV), maximum power, the total service area below the values calculated by the Johnstown, Pa.; WBRE-TV, Inc., in all cases would increase. For exam­ method provided in the Rules and th at (WBRE-TV), Wilkes-Barre, Pa.; Wyo­ ple, for two stations on adjacent chan­ no other VHF television service is a v a il­ ming Valley Broadcasting Co., (WILK- nels, separated by 60 miles, the service able to the area investigated. TV) Wilkes-Barre, Pa.; General area would total 14,380 square miles with 9. WSAZ, Inc., also requests special Electric Company, (WRGB-TV), Sche­ each at 500 feet antenna height, but relief for its station. It submits th a t it nectady, New York; Gable Broadcasting would increase to 22,877 square miles has attempted to improve service to the Co., (WFBG-TV), Altoona, Pa.; WGAL, with one station going to 2,000 feet. rugged terrain area surrounding H u n t­ lnc. (WGAL-TV), Lancaster, Pa.; As­ 6. Petitioners further contend that the ington, West Virginia, but has found sociated Broadcasters, Inc. (WLEV- present rule discriminates against Zone that the operation with reduced power TV), Bethlehem, Pa.; WDEL, Inc., I stations, especially those along the (46.8 kw) at its antenna height o f 1,250 (WDEL-TV), Wilmington, Delaware; Zone 1 boundary line; that the Commis­ feet is inadequate to provide ad eq u ate WAVE, Inc., (WAVE-TV), Louisville, sion itself recognize the advantages of service to the. area. It submits th at Kentucky; Havens & Martin, Inc., utilizing tall antenna towers in the studies indicate that due to shadow loss, (WTVR), Richmond, Virginia; North­ Third Notice and Sixth Report; that its signal in Charleston is approximately eastern Indiana Broadcasting Co., Inc., there is now available sufficient new data 16.9 db less than that computed from (WKJG-TV), Port Wayne, Indiana; Tri- to justify the adoption of the proposal; the Commission’s curves and that only City Radio Corp., (WLBC-TV), Muncie, that the present engineering standards by increased power and antenna h eig h t lnd. ; Easton Publishing Company, do not accurately predict service and can these shadow losses be overcom e. (WGLV-TV), Easton, Pa.; Great Lakes that as a result there are substantial It alleges that large areas in its lo ca lity Television Co., (WSEE), Erie, Pa.; areas in Zone 1 without service; and are without service and must resort to Prairie Television Co., (WTVP) . Decatur, that the adoption of the proposal is the community antenna systems for any Illinois; P rem ier Television, Inc., only way in which these “white areas” television service. WSAZ urges t h a t its (WFIE), Evansville, Ind.; Wabash Val­ may receive service. situation may be unique due to the ch ar­ ley Broadcasting Corp., (WTHI-TV), 7. WBEN urges that its individual acter of the terrain and the location of Terre Haute, Ind.; Van Curler Broad­ situation merits special consideration. communities in the Ohio-West V irg in ia - casting Corp., (WTRI-TV), Albany, New It submits that its plans from the earliest Kentucky area and suggests that the York; WFAM, Inc., (WFAM-TV), request for a new television station in Commission should recognize. this con­ Lafayette, Indiana; WJIM, Inc., WJIM- Buffalo contemplated a “rural” type dition by modifying § 3.616 (b) by add­ TV), Lansing, Michigan; Mt. station as provided for in the previous ing the following subparagraph: Washington TV, Inc., (WMTV-TV), Po­ rules, and that it had reason to believe (2) The above limitation in Z one 1 land Spring, Maine; Truth Publishing from the testimony in the television rule shall not be applicable where m a x im u m Company, Inc., (WSJV-TV), Elkhart, making proceedings leading up to the power of existing stations is required in Ind.; Greater Rockford Television, Inc., Sixth Report and Order and from the order to serve areas and populations (WREX-TV), Rockford, 111.; Veterans proposals made in the Third Notice that which cannot otherwise be a d eq u a tely Broadcasting Co., Inc., (WVET-TV), it would be authorized to operate at its served because of geographical d istrib u ­ Rochester, New York; WKST, Inc., present location and antenna height of tion of population or the allocation of (WKST-TV), New Castle, Pa.; Chemical 1,210 feet above average terrain with television facilities; nor shall the above City Broadcasting Co., (WTIP), Charles­ maximum power of 100 kw. Instead restriction be applicable where terrain ton, W. Va.,; Aircraft Owners and Pilots WBEN has been required to operate with conditions result in field intensities Association; Air Transport Association reduced power of 53.7 kw in light of its materially different from those w hich of America; Department of Commerce, antenna height above 1,000 feet in ac­ might be computed under the C o m m is­ (Civil Aeronautics Administration); As­ cordance with the rules as finally sion’s Standards of Good Engineering sistant Secretary of Defense; and Civil adopted. WBEN concedes that its au­ Practice. Aeronautics Board. thorization for the new site and antenna 5. In view of the large number of com­height was conditioned upon whatever 10. The parties opposed to the adop­ ments filed and the duplication of con­ final action was taken as a result of the tion of the proposed amendments, with tentions of the various parties, the com­ proceedings in Dockets 8736 et al. It is the exception of the aeronautical inter­ ments will be discussed without reference suggested in the event the Commission ests and government agencies co n cern ed to particular parties, except where noted. does not adopt the proposed change, that with hazard to air navigation, are pri­ The parties supporting the proposed consideration be given to WBEN-TV and marily television station licensees and Saturday, July 30, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 5459 permittees, both VHP and UHF. These ticular network with only a few stations, anything new. Others question the va­ parties argue that no justification has thus depriving other stations of network lidity of the measurements noting that a been presented by petitioners to warrant programs. Others oppose the increased portion of these measurements were the increase in antenna height for VHP antenna height proposal on the grounds made during periods of precipitation and stations in Zone 1. They urge that the that it would preclude additional alloca­ poor weather conditions. basis for the distinction between the tions in the VHP. 14. The Civil Aeronautics Board, As­ heights in Zone 1 and the other Zones is 12. Several parties comment with re­ sistant Secretary of Defense, Depart­ the closer spacings provided in Zone 1, spect to the WBEN and WSAZ requests ment of Commerce (Civil Aeronautics the greater density of population and for special relief. Some of these parties Administration), Air Transport Asso­ large number of cities—in addition to the urge that special circumstances may jus­ ciation of America, and Aircraft Owners lack of data on propagation effects with tify a relaxation of the power height lim­ and Pilots Association direct their com­ antenna heights over 1,000 feet. They itation in Zone 1, and they suggest that ments to the question of possible in­ argue that petitioners have not pre­ such situations be handled on a case-to- creased hazard to air navigation due to sented any data which would warrant case basis on a proper showing supported the adoption of the proposed rule. the change proposed. The UHF sta­ by field intensity measurements. Sugges­ These parties urge that the proposed tions contend that increased coverage tions were made as to the handling of increased antenna height for Zone 1 sta­ for VHP stations would involve greater hardship cases including a “grandfather” tions without attendant decrease in overlap of VHP signals within their own clause whereby stations such as WBEN power would be an incentive for station service areas and would thus further would be permitted to operate with full owners to apply for increased facilities. worsen the competitive disadvantage of power, amending the method of comput­ They argue that increased tower heights UHF. The VHF stations urge that ing the antenna elevation above average would require raising the minimum under the proposal, those stations which terrain, and a factual showing that the flight altitude of planes and that this would be unable to increase antenna additional coverage is required and that in turn may cause icing conditions or height because of zoning, aeronautical or the additional facilities will not cause ob- conditions of lesser visibility, and would economic considerations, would suffer jectional interference. Some parties impose an unwarranted hardship upon increased interference and would thus would limit these departures from the the aviation industry. They refer to a be at a competitive disadvantage with present Rule only in those instances paper (ACC 3/21.8) which discusses a those which would be able to obtain such where the minimum co-channel spacings new national aeronautical policy with increased height. With respect to the are at least 190 miles, the minimum spac­ regards to hazards to air navigation im­ engineering studies made by WBEN, it is ing required for Zone II co-channel VHP posed by antenna towers and which urged that the assumptions made in that stations. Mt. Washington TV, Inc?, makes recommendations to the Air Co­ study are unrealistic; that they do not urges that if Section 3.614 is amended so ordinating Committee that action be take into account the economic problems that interference is caused to Station initiated by the Commission to minimize of finding new sites and obtaining the WMTW, or other Zone H stations, that the number of towers which extend over necessary towers and antennas; and that these Zone II stations be authorized to 1,000 feet above ground. they do not demonstrate the effects of increase power to offset the additional 15. The Gable Broadcasting Company limiting conditions that might prevail. interference without regard to the 2,000 (WFBG-TV) and the Elm City Broad­ For example, no showing is made as to foot limit on antenna height for Zone II. casting Corp. (WNHC-TV) request oral comparative coverage when one station 13. Other parties oppose the requests hearing and argument. goes to 2,000 feet while all the others for special relief for the petitioners. 16. In its reply to oppositions filed, remain at their present antenna height, They urge that both WSAZ and WBEN WBEN argues that the cut-back in and where one station remains un­ have not shown that they do not ade­ power for Zone 1 was a compromise changed while surrounding stations in­ quately serve the principal cities to be made at the time of the Sixth Report crease to the proposed heights. In this served by the assignments in question; and was meant to be a temporary one. connection, Robert R. Thomas, Jr., that there are alternative methods avail­ It submits that while there may be some argues that if WSAZ increases its an­ able to solve their problems, such as inequities for some VHF and UHF sta­ tenna height to 2,000 feet and other sta­ relocating antenna sites closer to the tions in the proposed rule change, the tions on co-channel and adjacent chan­ principal cities; that satellites and Commission does not guarantee the nel remain at their present facilities, booster stations could provide the addi­ “status quo” to any applicant when it there would be an increase of 4,417 tional service sought to be rendered; and grants an authorization for a radio or square miles within WSAZ’s interference- that in any event, the proposed increase television station, and that in any event free service area, but at the same time in power which would be authorized the public interest must be the primary there would be an increase of 7,655 would not accomplish the objective of the consideration in evaluating a proposed square miles in the interference areas of parties. With respect to WSAZ, it is rule change. WBEN has no objection to the eleven stations affected by the WSAZ argue'd that this station has moved in a any of the proposed alternatives pro­ change in facilities to 2,000 feet. direction away from the area it claims vided it would be permitted to operate Others urge that if maximum power with is not presently served; while in the with its present tower height with max­ antennsflheights up to 2,000 feet are au­ WBEN case, it is contended that a large imum power. In reply to the aero­ thorized, other stations should be per­ part of the area to be served by the nautical interests, WBEN submits that mitted increases in power from the increased power will eventually receive the present rule permits antenna heights present values to from 500 to 1000 kw. in interference from the co-channel opera­ of 2,000 feet for VHP stations as well order to permit these stations to regain tion of a Channel 4 station in Irwin, Pa. as UHF stations and hence the proposal the lost area due to the increased inter­ Some parties found fault with the WBEN would not change the status of hazards ference. field strength measurements designed to to air navigation; and contends that the 11. Several parties in opposition con­show that its contemplated coverage present procedure has been satisfactory. tend that the increased height is unnec­ area was not receiving adequate signals. With respect to the comments direc­ essary since almost all of the areas in It was argued that the cluster-type ted to its measurements, WBEN con­ Zone 1 either receive service, or will do so, method of making measurements does tends that these measurements were in the near future. It is urged that all not show the average conditions as sat­ performed by qualified engineers utiliz­ but 19 of the VHP assignments in this isfactorily as mobile measurements; that ing efficient and acceptable engineering Zone are occupied; that 50 percent of 7 of the 18 cities chosen for the survey methods. WBEN further states that these have antenna heights of 750 feet or showed field intensities exceeding the the precipitation during the measure­ less; and that only 16.5 percent have m in im u m required for Grade B service ment would have a negligible effect.* antenna heights over 1,030 feet. Consid­ and that 3 communities are outside the calculated Grade B contour; that out of ering station location, it is argued that * These replies were filed In a document 88 percent have antenna heights of 1,030 the 18 cities chosen, 3 are closer to Roch­ entitled “Comments ol WBEN-TV on re­ feet and below, and that only 11.3 percent ester, 4 are closer to Erie, both of which sponses Filed by Other Parties” on Decem­ have antennas of over 1,030 feet. Some have their own VHF stations; that 4 ber 29, 1954, 23 days after the tim e specified contend that the greater coverage pos­ cities have their own UHF assignments; for the filing of replies to comments. WBEN sible under the proposal could result in and that since many of these cities are urged that these comments were filed be­ coverage of the entire Zone 1 by a par­ in shadow areas, the data does not reveal cause the validity of the measurements sub- 5460 RULES AND REGULATIONS

17. In the Sixth Report and Order thechannel interference that will be caused by achieved by amending our height and Commission reviewed its proposals with such operation with the greater antenna power rule to permit VHP stations in respect to height and power and effected heights. In Zone 1 we have provided that VHP stations may use antennas up to a Zone I to operate with maximum power substantial revisions in the final rule. height of 1,000 feet, with maximum power. up to antenna heights of 1,250 feet above In this Report the Commission, in the In view of the fact that station separations average terrain instead of the 1,000 feet light of certain economic and engineer­ in this Zone are lower than in Zones II and presently prescribed. ing data in the record, set up three zones III, and in view of the fact that cities in 20. There are presently only 18 sta­ with different co-channel and adjacent Zone 1 are more closely located than cities tions in Zone I with antenna heights in channel separations for each zone. The in Zones II and III, until a larger body of excess of 1,000 feet above average ter­ rule finally adopted by the Commission data is available with respect to operation rain, and 7 of these are located at one in the Sixth Report with respect to with antenna heights over 1,000 feet with higher powers we are unable to permit op­ site in New York City. Under the heights and powers was promulgated in eration with such powers at heights over amended rule, an increase in power up light of the separations specified for co­ 1.000 feet. to 4 db would be the maximum author­ channel assignments in the various ized in any situation. The effect of the zones. While the Sixth Report was The curves adopted by the Commission amendment would be to increase the lim­ pending before the Commission, consid­ provide an incentive to achieve higher itation of other stations on a line between eration was given to the possibility of heights; the slope of the curve is drawn the stations in the order of some one to authorizing 2,000 foot antennas for all so that the service area of the station three miles, assuming such other stations channels throughout the entire country will increase as heights increase. did not similarly increase antenna height with a set of curves supplied for power 18. WBEN and WSAZ request that we and power. The extent of the increased reductions for heights about 2,000 feet. amend our rules relating to television coverage for stations going to the new This possibility was based on the fact antenna height and power to remove the maximum would be in the order of four that operation with maximum power on present restriction for VHP stations in to five miles, assuming no interference. the minimum co-channel spacings pro­ Zone I on the use of maximum power Accordingly, we believe that stations op­ vided in the Sixth Report at 2,000 feet with >ntenna heights above 1,000 feet erating under the new rule would have would not radically reduce the service and to provide the same requirements for very little impact on the operation of area of a small station with low power stations in all three zones. However, other stations, both VHP and UHF, while and height. This proposal was rejected upon our careful consideration of all of at the same time such stations as WBEN- by the Commission. Various considera­ the comments and evidence in the pro­ TV and WSAZ-TV would, through the tions were urged at that time in support ceeding, we are not convinced that peti­ use of maximum, power and increased of the contention that use of maximum tioners have made a sufficient showing to antenna height, be enabled to improve power at higher heights in Zone 1 was warrant the basic change in the alloca­ the service rendered to the public. not in the public interest. It was argued tion structure for television stations in 21. We also believe that the amend­ that in the Zone 1 area where a mini­ Zone I that adoption of the amendment ment we are adopting which would per­ mum separation of 170 miles was pro­ as proposed by petitioners would entail. As indicated above, the heights and mit VHF stations to operate with maxi­ vided, the resulting mutual interference mum power at 1,250 feet instead of the would be too great. A consideration powers for stations in Zone I were not 1,000 feet presently prescribed, will be of strongly urged was that provision for adopted solely because we had insuffi­ cient data to' warrant the use of maxi­ negligible effect on problems relating to operation with maximum power at 2,000 air hazard. In the first place, it should feet in Zone 1 would make it very diffi­ mum power with antenna heights up to 2.000 feet as provided in the other zones. be understood that the present rule does cult for the competitive operation of not place any limitation on antenna UHF stations, particularly in the early We explained in the Sixth Report and Order that an equally compelling factor heights above 1,000 feet but merely spec­ development of that service. The Com­ ified that when antennas above 1,000 mission’s decision with respect to heights was the great number of cities within Zone I and the close spacings between feet are utilized, that power be reduced of 2,000 feet was, in effect, a compromise, accordingly. The present amendment which provided for use of maximum the cities in this area. In adopting the 1,000-foot limit for maximum power for would merely require that power be re­ power with heights up to 2,000 feet in duced only when heights above 1,250 Zones n and III and up to 1,000 feet in VHP stations in Zone I, the Commission was concerned within the impact of VHP feet are employed in Zone I. Further­ Zone 1 for the VHP with appropriate more, adequate procedures are available curves* for computing the appropriate coverage on the new UHF service and was aware of the lower separations in Zone I for determining the matter of hazards reduction in power above these antenna to air navigation on a case-by-case basis. limits. In the Sixth Report the Commis­ as compared with the remainder of the country. We therefore were of the view 22. In view of the foregoing, the Com­ sion stated that the use of high antenna mission has concluded that the public heights were desirable since the ratio of that maximum power should be em­ ployed by VHP stations in Zone I only interest would be served by amending service area gained to service area lost our rules to permit VHP television sta­ increases with antenna height, the Com­ with intenna heights up to 1,000 feet. mission stated: 19. A review of the proceedings lead­ tions to employ maximum power in Zone ing up to the Sixth Report and Order I with antenna heights up to 1,250 feet Accordingly, in order to achieve a more above average terrain. This compromise efficient utilization of each television chan­ makes clear that the Commission has we believe, would enable VHP stations nel we are modifying the provisions with always recognized the benefits to be de­ in Zone I to achieve the benefits of respect to the use of antennas over 500 feet to rived from the use of higher antenna higher antenna heights while at the specify that in Zones II and III where wider heights. We believe that, as an overall same time would minimize the effect of station separations have been maintained policy, the public interest is best served in the Table, antennas will be authorized in by operation of stations with high an­ such increased height and power on other the VHP up to heights of 2,000 feet, with tenna heights, and this is especially stations in the area. maximum power, without regard to co- true when all stations so operate. How­ 23. Certain parties to the proceeding ever, we must consider the fact that we have requested oral argument and hear­ mitted by it was questioned and because an ing. We do not believe such procedure attack was made on the integrity of the en­ are now faced with an established pat­ is necessary. All parties have had full gineer making these measurements. Tri- tern of many operating stations in Zone and adequate opportunity for the sub­ City Radio Corp., Northeastern Indiana I and we must consider the overall ef­ mission of written comments and volu­ Broadcasting Co., Inc., and Havens and fect on amending the height and power minous comments have been submitted. Martin, Inc., filed Motions to Strike the rule at this time on the existing situa­ above-mentioned document on the grounds tion. We believe that a compromise We see no necessity for further proceed­ that it was filed late and did not show good approach to the height and power prob­ ings and believe that such further pro­ cause for the late filing. We are of the view lem would have the least impact on other ceedings would serve no useful purpose. that WBEN has made a sufficient showing 24. Authority for the adoption of the to warrant consideration of its late filing, stations while at the same time would and we are therefore denying the aforemen­ permit stations to improve their opera­ amendment herein is contained in sec­ tioned Motion to Strike. tion and to achieve the benefit to be tions 303 (a), (b), (c), (d),

Maximum Power in Kilowatts M ilk in Oklahoma City, Okla., Marketing Area notice of extension of time for filing EXCEPTIONS TO RECOMMENDED DECISION WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO TENTATIVE MARKETING AGREEMENT, AND TO ORDER, AS AMENDED Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri­ cultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U. S. C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure governing the formulation of marketing agreements and orders (7 CPR Part 900), notice is hereby given that the time for filing exceptions to the recommended decision with respect to proposed amendments to the tentative marketing agreement and to the order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk in the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, marketing area, which was issued July 19, 1955 (20 F. R. 5259), is hereby ex­ tended to August 11, 1955. Dated: July 27, 1955. [seal] R oy W. Lennartson, Deputy Administrator. [P. R. Doc. 55-6170; Piled, July 29, 1955; 8:48 a. m.]

t 7 CFR Part 967 ] [Docket No. AO170-A91 Milk in South Bend-La P orte, Ind., Marketing Area 1 DECISION WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSED MARKETING AGREEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER AMENDING ORDER, AS AMENDED Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri­ cultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U. S. C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure, as amended, governing pro­ ceedings to formulate marketing agree­ ments and marketing orders 47 CFR Part 900), a public hearing was conducted at South Bend, Indiana, on June 13, 1955, pursuant to notice thereof which was issued on June 7,1955 (20 F. R. 4038). (Sec. 4, 48 Stat. 1066 as amended; 47 U. S. C. 154. Interprets or applies sec. 303, 48 Stat. Upon the basis of the evidence intro­ 1082 as amended; 47 U. S. C. 303) duced at the hearing and the record thereof, the Acting Deputy Administra­ Adopted: July 20, 1955. tor, Agricultural Marketing Service, on Released: July 22, 1955, July 12, 1955, filed with the Hearing Clerk, United States Department of F ederal Communications Commission,1 Agriculture, his recommended decision [seal] Mary J ane Morris, Secretary. and opportunity to file written excep­ tions thereto. This recommended deci­ [F. R. Doc. 55-6062; Filed, July 29, 1955; 8:45 a. m.J sion was published in the F ederal R egister on July 16,1955 (20 F. R. 5100). 1 Commissioners Hyde and Webster not participating; Commissioner Bartley dissenting; Commissioner Mack abstaining from voting. *See also Title 7, Part 967, supra. N o. 148------3 5462 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

The material issues, findings and con­ sions of the Agricultural Marketing Agricultural Research Service clusions, and general findings of the Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 recommended decision (20 P. R. 5100; U. S. C. 601 et seq.) and the applicable l 9 CFR Part 151 1 P. R. Doc. 55-5804) are hereby approved rules of practice and procedure, as R e c o g n it io n o f B r e e d s a n d B o o k s of and adopted as the findings and conclu­ amended, governing the formulation of sions of this decision as if set forth in marketing agreements and marketing R ecord o f P u r e b r e d A n im a l s full herein. orders (7- CFR Part 900), a public hear­ n o t ic e o f p r o p o s e d r u l e m a k in g Determination of representative ing was held upon certain proposd Notice is hereby given in accordance period. The month of May 1955, is amendments to the tentative marketing with section 4 of the Administrative Pro­ hereby determined to be the representa­ agreement and to the order, as amended cedure Act (5 U. S. C. 1003), that, pur­ tive period for the purpose of ascertain­ regulating the handling of milk in the suant to paragraph 1606 of section 201 of ing whether the issuance of an order South Bend-La Porte, Indiana, market­ the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended (19 amending the order, as amended, regu­ ing area. Upon the basis of the evidence U. S. C., 1201, par. 1606), it is proposed lating the handling of milk in the South introduced at such hearing and the rec­ to.revise the regulations governing the Bend-LaPorte, Indiana, marketing area ord thereof, it is found that; recognition of breeds and books of record in the manner set forth in the attached (1) The said order, as amended, and of purebred animals (9 CFR Part 151) amending order is approved or favored by as hereby further amended, and all of to read as follows: producers who during such period were the terms and conditions thereof, will engaged in the production of milk for a tend to effectuate the declared policy § 151.1 Definitions. Words used in sale in the marketing area specified in of the act. this part in the singular form shall be such marketing order, as amended. (2) The parity prices of milk as deter­ deemed to import the plural, and vice Marketing agreement and order. An­ mined pursuant to section 2 of the act versa, as the case may demand. As used nexed hereto and made a part hereof are not reasonable in view of the price in this part, the following words, names, are two documents entitled respectively, of feeds, available suppliés of feeds, and or terms shall have the meanings set “Marketing Agreement Regulating the other economic conditions which affect forth in this section, unless otherwise Handling of Milk in the South Bend- market supply and demand for milk in clearly indicated by the context. La Porte, Indiana, Marketing Area,” and the said marketing area, and the mini­ (a) The act. Paragraph 1606 of sec­ “Order Amending the Order, as Amend­ mum prices specified in the order, tion 201 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as ed, Regulating the Handling of Milk in as amended, and as hereby further amended <19 U. S. C. 1201, Par. 1606 and the South Bend-La Porte, Indiana, Mar­ amended, are such prices as will reflect P. L. 475, 80th Cong., 62 Stat. 161). keting Area,” which have been decided the aforesaid factors, insure a sufficient (b) Department. The United States upon as the detailed and appropriate quantity of pure and wholesome milk Department of Agriculture. means of effectuating the foregoing con­ and be in the public interest; and (c) Branch. The Animal Inspection clusions. These documents shall not be­ (3) The said order, as amended, and and Quarantine Branch of the Agricul­ come effective unless and until the as hereby further amended, regulates tural Research Service of the Depart­ requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of the handling of milk in the same manner ment. practice and procedure, as amended, gov­ as, and is applicable only to persons in (d) Chief of the Branch. The Chief erning proceedings to formulate market­ the respective classes of industrial and of the Branch or any officer or employee ing agreements and orders have been commercial activity specified in, a mar­ of the Branch to whom authority has met. keting agreement upon which a hearing heretofore lawfully been delegated or to It is hereby ordered that all of this has been held. whom authority may hereafter lawfully decision, except the attached marketing be delegated to act in his stead. Order relative to handling. It is (e) Inspector. An inspector of the agreement, be published in the F ederal therefore ordered, that on and after R e g is t e r . The regulatory provisions of Branch or of the Bureau of Customs of said marketing agreement are identical the effective date hereof, the handling the United States Treasury Department with those contained in the order, as of milk in the South Bend-La Porte, In­ authorized to perform functions under amended, and as hereby proposed to be diana, marketing area shall be in con­ the regulations in this part. further amended by the attached order formity to and in compliance with the (f) Animal. Any purebred animal im­ which will be published with this , deci­ terms and conditions of the aforesaid ported specially for breeding purposes sion. order, as amended, and as hereby further except a black, silver, or platinum fox, amended, and the aforesaid order, as or any fox which is a mutation or type Issued at Washington, D. C., this 27th amended, is hereby further amended as developed therefrom. day of July 1955. follows; (g) , Purebred. A term applicable to 1. In § 967.51 (a) delete the words [ s e a l ] E arl L. B u t z , animals which are the progeny of known Assistant Secretaryl “current supply-demand ratio” and the and registered ancestors of the same words “supply-demand ratio” and sub­ recognized breed and for which at least Order1 Amending the Order, as stitute, therefor in both instances the three generations of ancestry can be Amended, Regulating the Handling words “adjusted supply-demand ratio.” traced: Provided, however, That in the of Milk in the South Bend-La Porte, 2. In § 967.51 (a) delete the words “3 case of sheep registered on the basis of Indiana, Marketing Area cents” and substitute the words “2 flocks, the term is applicable to animals § 967.0 Findings and determinations. cents”. of a recognized breed which originate in The findings and determinations here­ 3. In § 967.51 (d) delete subparagraph a flock for which available breeding data, inafter set forth are supplementary and (4) and substitute a new subparagraph as shown in the registry association’s in addition to the findings and determi­ (4) as follows; records, establish that the flock has been nations previously made in connection (4) If the current supply-demand in existence at least ten years. with the issuance of the aforesaid order ratio is greater or less than the current (h) Pedigree certificate. A document and of each of the previously issued supply-demand ratio computed by the issued by a registry association giving amendments thereto; and all of said market administrator during the third the pedigree of an animal and certifying previous findings and determinations are delivery period immediately preceding, that it is registered in the book of record hereby ratified and affirmed, except inso­ add or subtract the difference, respec­ of the association issuing the document, far as such findings and determinations tively, to or from the percentage com­ and containing all pertinent information may be in conflict with the findings and puted pursuant to subparagraph (3) of relating to the registered animal, such as determinations set forth herein. this paragraph. The result is the “ad­ color and natural and artificial mark­ (a) Findings upon the basis of the justed supply-demand ratio”; and if the ings, a record of the name and address hearing record. Pursuant to the provi- current supply-demand ratio does not of the breeder, and the name and address differ from that computed during the of each subsequent owner of the animal. 1 This order shall not become effective un­ third delivery period preceding, the cur­ (i) Book of record. A printed book less and until the requirements of §'900.14 sponsored by a registry association and of the rules of practice and procedure, gov­ rent supply-demand ratio shall be the containing breeding data relative to a erning proceedings to formulate marketing “adjusted supply-demand ratio”. large number of registered "purebred agreements and marketing orders have been [F. R. Doc. 55-6171; Filed, July 29, 1955; animals used as a basis for the issuance m e t. 8:49 a. m.] of pedigree certificates. Saturday, July 30, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 5463 (j) Certificate of pure breeding. A ing that the animal declared for free of record listed in § 151.9 and must not document issued by the Chief of the entry under the act is the identical ani­ have been registered on inspection with­ Branch to, and for the exclusive use of, mal described in the pedigree certificate, out regard to purity of breeding. the collector of customs, United States shall be furnished to the branch by the RECOGNITION OF BREEDS AND BOOKS OF Treasury Department, certifying that the importer or his agent. RECORD animal to which the document refers is § 151.7 Examination of animal, (a) § 151.9 Recognized breeds and books a purebred animal of a recognized breed for the purpose of determining identity, and duly registered in a book of record of record. Breeds of animals and books an examination shall be made by an of record listed in paragraphs (a) and recognized under the regulations in this inspector at the port of arrival of each part for that breed. (b) of this section are hereby recognized. animal for which free entry is% claimed Recognition of such breeds and books of (k) Port of arrival. The coastal or under the act. border port where animals first come record will be continued, however, only (b) The importer or his agent shall if the books of record involved are kept into the United States. ' provide adequate assistance and facili­ (l) Port of entry. The port where by the custodians thereof in a form ties for restraining and otherwise han­ which is reasonably current in the customs entry is made for imported ani­ dling the animal and present it in such mals. opinion of the Chief of the Branch. manner and under such conditions as Books of purebred registration shall be CERTIFICATION OF PUREBRED ANIMALS in the opinion of the inspector will make sent to the branch at Washington 25, a proper examination possible. Other­ § 151.2 Issuance of a certificate of D. C., through the United States Govern­ wise the examination of the animal will ment Despatch Agency, 45 Broadway, pure breeding. The Chief of the Branch be refused or postponed by the inspector will issue a certificate of pure breeding New York 6, New York, U. S. A., imme­ until the importer or his agent meets diately following their publication. for an animal claimed to be entitled to these requirements at the port of arrival. free entry under the act provided the re­ (a) Breeds and books of record in (c) A pedigree certificate, as required countries other than Canada. Books of quirements of the regulations in this by § 151.4, shall be presented at the port part are complied with. Such certificate record of the registry associations listed of arrival of the animal to the inspector below are recognized for the following will be issued to the collector of customs making the examination in order that at the port of entry of the animal. breeds: Provided, That no Belted Gallo­ proper identification of the animal may way cattle, Criolla or Pjordhest (form­ § 151.3 Application for certificate of be made. Removal of the animal from erly known as W estland) horse, pure breeding. An application for a cer­ the port of arrival prior to presentation tificate of pure breeding executed by of such pedigree certificate shall con­ Shetland or Welsh pony, dog, or cat reg­ the importer of the animal or his agent stitute a waiver of any further claim to istered in any of the books named shall may be made to the branch after cus­ certification under the regulations in this be certified under the act as purebred toms entry has been made, on forms fur­ part. unless a pedigree certificate showing nished or approved by the branch. Such § 151.8 Eligibility of an animal for three complete generations of known an application shall show the surname of certification. To be eligible for certifi­ and recorded purebred ancestry of the the importer and his given name, or ini­ cation under the act, an animal must be particular breed involved, issued by the tials, if any; the address (in the United purebred of a recognized breed and have appropriate association listed below, is States) of the importer; the number, been registered in good faith in a book submitted for such animal. breed, and sex, and port and date of arrival of the animal imported ; the cus­ Cattle toms entry number of the importation, and the name of the vessel or other car­ Name of breed Book of record B y whom published rier by which shipped. Aberdeen-Angus- Aberdeen-Angus Herd Book.. Aberdeen-Angus Cattle Society, Alexander Keith, secretary, § 151.4 Pedigree certificate. A pedi­ 91 Union St., Aberdeen, Scotland. gree certificate for an animal listed in Africander______Africander Cattle Herd Book. The Africander Cattle Breeders’ Society, under the super­ vision and authority of the South African Stud Book Asso­ §151.9, issued by the custodian of the ciation, E. L. Househam, secretary, 40 Henry St., Bloem­ appropriate book of record listed in said fontein, Union of South Africa. section and on which there has been Alderney. Herd Book of the Bailiwick Royal Alderney Agricultural Society (The Alderney Branch of Guernsey (Alderney of the Royal Guernsey A. and H. Society), P. D. Sumner, entered, in accordance with the rules of Branch). secretary. The Bungalow, Butes, Alderney, Channel Isles. Ayrsbire. Ayrshire Herd B o o k ..._____. Ayrshire Cattle Herd Book Society of Great Britain and entry of the registry association, a com­ Ireland, John Graham, secretary, 1 Racecorse Rd., Ayr, plete record of transfers of ownership Scotland. from the breeder to and including the Devon______Davy’s Devon Herd Book.... Devon Cattle Breeders’ Society, Cyril Ernest Berry, secre­ tary, 1 Mayfield Terrace, Wiveliscombe, Somerset, England. United States importer, shall be fur­ Dexter____ ...... Dexter Herd B o o k ..,------Dexter Cattle Society, A. E. Richardson, secretary, Crabtree nished by the importer or his agent to House, Lower Beeding, Horsham, Sussex, England. Belted Galloway. The Belted Galloway Herd The Belted Galloway Cattle Society, J. Campbell Laing, the inspector at the time of examination Book. secretary, Galloway Estate Office, Newton Stewart, Wig­ of the animal as provided in § 151.7. townshire, Scotland. Galloway------Galloway Herd Book______Galloway Cattle Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Donald Following examination of the animal, the M. McQueen, secretary, 111 High St., Dumfries, Scotland. importer or his agent shall present the Guernsey__—___ English Guernsey Herd Book. English Guernsey Cattle Society, Col. T. M. Ker, secretary, pedigree certificate to the branch at the 7 Cleveland Row, St. James’s, London, S. W. 1, England. D o...... Herd Book of the Bailiwick Royal Guernsey Agricultural and Horticultural : Society, time of making application for a certifi­ of Guernsey (Guernsey Ernest de Garis, secretary, States Arcade Balcony, St. cate of pure breeding as provided in Branch). Peter Port, Guernsey, Channel Isles. Hereford______Herd Book of Hereford Cattle- Hereford Herd Book Society, R. J. Bentley, secretary, 3 Offa §151.3. The branch will later return the St., Hereford, England. document to the party who submitted it. Highland—.. —. — Highland Herd Book------Highland Cattle Society of Scotland, Donald G. Noble, secre­ A verbatim translation of the descrip­ tary, 17 York PI., Perth, Scotland. Holstein-Friesian. Friescb Rundvee-Stamboek... Vereeniging: “ Het Friesch Rundvee-Stamboek,” Ir. H. G. tion relating to color and markings shall A. Leignes Bakhoven, secretary, Zuiderplein 2-4-6, Leeu- appear in English in the pedigree certifi­ warden. The Netherlands. Do. Nederlandsch Rundvee-Stam­ Vereeniging: “ Het Nederlandsche Rundvee-Stamboek,” H. cate for the animal or in a separate cer­ boek. W. J. Dekker, Chief Administrator, Stadhoudersplantsoen tificate appended to the pedigree certifi­ 24, ’S Gravenhage, The Netherlands. . Jersey.. Jersey Herd B o o k ...... __ .... Royal Jersey Agricultural and Horticultural Society, H. C. cate. Shepard, secretary, 3 Mulcaster St., St. Helier, Jersey, Chan- U6 I ASICS. , , , § 151.5 Alteration of pedigree certifi­ Do. English Jersey Herd Book__ English Jersey Cattle Society, Edward Ashby, secretary, 19 Bloomsbury Square, London, W. C. 1, England. cate. No pedigree certificate which in Kerry.. British Kerry Cattle Herd British Kerry Cattle Society, R. O. Hubl, secretary, The Mile­ the opinion of the Chief of the Branch Book. stone, Stanmore Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex, England. Do. Kerry Cattle Herd Book..—.. Royal Dublin Society, Horace H. Poole, registrar, B alls has been substantially altered will be Bridge, Dublin, Ireland. accepted. Lincoln Red Lincoln Red Shorthorn Herd Lincoln Red Shorthorn Society, W. Dunnaway, secretary, Shorthorn. Book. “Agriculture House”, Park St., Lincoln, England. Red Danish____ Stambog over K0er af R0d De Samvirkende Danske Landboforeninger, A. Wulfi Peder­ §151.6 Affidavit of identity. An affi­ Dansk Malkerace. sen, secretary, Vindegade 72, Odense, Denmark. davit by the owner, agent, or importer, Stambog over Tyre af R0d Dansk Malkerace. duly acknowledged before an officer hav­ Register-Stambog over Kvaeg ing authority to administer oaths, stat- af R0d Dansk Malkerace. 5464 5464 Cattle—Continued H orses—Continued

Name of breed Book of record By whom published Name of breed Book of record By whom published

Red Foil Red Poll Herd Book.. _ . Thoroughbred- Registre des Chevaux de Pur Jockey-Club de Belgique, Lt. Colonel Hre Bon J. van Zuylen A. C. Burton, secretary, 32 Princes St., Ipswich, Suffolk, Sang. van Nyevelt, secretary, 1 Rue Guimard, Brussels 4, Belgium. England. D o .. .. . _____ Stud Book Brasileiro...___ ... Jockey Club Brasileiro, Ricardo Xavier da Silvelra, director, Shorthorn. . . . Coates’s Herd Book______Shorthorn Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Arthur Fur- Av. Rio Branco, 197 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. neaux, secretary, Victoria House, Southampton Row, Lon­ D o______.... Stud Book Peruano__...... Jockey Club of Peru, Oscar Berckemeyer P., president, don, W. C. 1, England. Camana 780, Lima, Peru. South Devon___ Herd Book of South Devon South Devon Herd Book Society, W. G. Turpitt, secretary, D o...... American Stud Book...... The Jockey Club, Mrs. L. Brennan, registrar, 250 Park Ave., CattlA 16 Sherborne Rd., Newton Abbot, Devon, England. (Recognition of this book will New York )7, N. Y. Sussex. ______Sussex Herd Bonk _. Sussex Herd Book Society, A. G. Holland, secretary, 17 Devon­ be restricted to Thorough­ shire St., London, W. 1, England. breds imported as follows: Welsh______Welsh Black Cattle Society, G. Williams Edwards, secretary, (a) Horses bred or born in Book. 27 Market St., Caernarvon, Wales. the United States, shipped to a foreign country, and re­ turned to this country; (b) H orses horses bred or born in Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Eire, or France, whose pedi­ Arabian Arab Horse Stud Book__..... The Arab Horse Society, Col. R. O. de V, Askin, secretary grees trace wholly, or In 38 Langham St., London, W. 1, England. part, to horses bred or born Do.. Polska Ksiega Stadna Koni, Towarzystwo Hodowli Konia Arabskiego, Dr. Edward Skor in the United States; or (C) Arabskich Czystej Krwi. kowski, secretary, Krakow, Biskupia 6, Poland. horses from countries where D o. General Stud Book______Weatherby & Sons, 15 Cavendish Sq., London, W. 1, England a book of purebred registra­ Do., Registro-Matricula de Caballos General Livestock Administration, The Minister of Agriculture, tion for Thoroughbreds does de Pura Sangre. Madrid, Spain. not exist.) Do.. Registre Genealogico Nacional Ministerio de Hacienda de la Nación, Lotería de Beneficencia D o. Regisro Genealogico Nacio­ Ministerio de Hacienda de la Nación, Lotería de Beneficencia de Caballos S. P. Ç. Nacional y Casinos, Enzo Valenti Ferro, Chief, National nal de Caballos S. P. C. Nacional y Casinos, Enzo Valenti Ferro, Chief, National Genealogical Register for Horses, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Genealogical Register for Horses, Buenos Aires, Argentina. D o - Stud Book Français Registre Commission du Studbook Français de Pur Sang, M. Maze- Welsh Pony and Welsh Stud Book. Welsh Pony & Cob Society, J. A. George, secretary, Offices of PROPOSED RULE MAKING des Chevaux de Pur Sang. Sencier, Inspector General, Chief, Service des Haras, Minis­ Cob. the Royal Welsh Agricultural Society, Queen’s Rd., try of Agriculture, 78 rue de Varenne (7), Paris, France. Aberystwyth, Wales, Great Britain. Do.. The Arabian Stud B o o k ...... The Arabian- Horse Club Registry of America, Inc., Frank (Recognition of this book will Watt, secretary, 111 W. Monroe St., Chicago 3, 111, be restricted to Arabian Asses horses which originate for importation in Saudi Arabia, or trace to pure Arabian Jack and Jennet Section of Société Centrale ¿ ’Agriculture des Doux-Sevres, M. Marcel stock of that country.) the Stud Book ou Livre Moreau, president, 4 rue Vielle-Rose, Niort, France. Belgian______Stud-Book des Chevaux de Société Royale “Le Cheval de Trait Belge”, Edgard Bedoret, Généalogique des animaux Trait Beiges. general secretary, 45a, rue de l’Ecuyer, Brussels, Belgium. Mulassiers du Poitou. , Cleveland B a y ... Cleveland Bay Stud Book.... Cleveland Bay Horse Society, Oswald Welford, secretary, “Angelus”, Roxby, Staithes, Saltburn, Yorkshire, England. Clydesdale_____ Clydesdale Stud-Book__ ..... Clydesdale Horse Society of Great Britain & Ireland, Robert Sheep Jarvis, secretary. 93 Hop St., Glasgow, C, 2, Scotland. Criolla...... “Registre Definitive section Sociedad Rural Argentina, Enrique C. Frers, Florida 460, of the Stud Book Argentine Buenos Aires, Argentina. Border Leicester.. Border Leicester Flock Book.. Society of Border Leicester Sheep Breeders, Robert Jarvis, para la Raza Criolla. secretary, 93 Hope St., Glasgow, C. 2, Scotland. Fjordhest (for* Stambok over Fjordhest__ ... Statens Stambokkontor, W. W. Christie, State Stud-Book Cheviot Cheviot Sheep Flock Book___ Cheviot Sheep Society, Guy H. Armstrong, secretary, Com­ merly known Registrar, Munkedamsveien 35 VI, Oslo, Norway. mercial Bank Buildings, Hawick, Scotland. as Westland). Corriedale. The Flock Book for Corrie­ The Australian Corriedale Association, H. T. C. Woodfall, Hackney...... Hackney Stud Book...... Hackney Börse Society, Robert F. Ling, secretary, 38 Langham dale Sheep in Australia. secretary, Temple Court, 422 Collins St., Melbourne, C. 1, St., London, W. L England. Percheron___ .... British Percheron Stud Book. British Percheron Horse Society, A. E. Vyse, secretary, Owen D o______Corriedale Flock Book (New The Corriedale Sheep Society, Inc., C. H. Lawrence, secre­ Webb House, Gresham Road, Cambridge, England. Zealand). tary, 154 Hereford St., Christchurch, New Zealand. D o______Stud-Book Percheron de Société Hippique Percheronne de France, E. Lemarié, secre­ Dorset Horn____ Dorset Horn Flock Book...... Dorset Horn Sheep Breeders' Association, E. F. B. Lucas, France. tary, 7 rue Villette-Gaté, Nogent-le-Rotrou (E-&-L), France. secretary, Bank Chambers, Dorchester, Dorset, England. Shetland P ony... Shetland Pony Stud-Book.... Shetland Pony Stud-Book Society, Thomas H. F. Myles, Hampshire Down. Hampshire Down Flock Book. Hampshire Down Sheep Breeders’ Association, Mrs. W. Gar­ secretary, 61 George St., Perth, Scotland. rett, secretary, 38 Endless St., Salisbury, Wilts., England. Shire...... Shire Horse Stud Book___.... Shire Horse Society, A. G. Holland, secretary, 17 Devonshire Kent or Romney Kent or Romney Marsh Flock Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep Breeders’ Association, G. W. St., London, W. I, England. Marsh. Book. Tuffrey, secretary, Dover Place, Ashford, Kent, England. Suffolk______.... Suffolk Stud-Book______Suffolk Horse Society, Raymond Keer, secretary, 6 Church Kerry Hill______Kerry Hill Flock B ook...... Kerry Hill (Wales) Flock Society, Morris Marshall & Poole, St., Woodbridge, Suffolk, England. secretaries, Newtown, Montgomeryshire, England. Thoroughbred.—, Australian Stud Book____.... Australian Jockey Club and Victoria Racing Club,. W. J. Leicester....____ Leicester Flock Book. Leicester Sheep Breeders’ Association, P. S. Atkinson, secre­ McFadden, Keeper of the Stud Book, 6 Bligb St., Sydney, tary, The Exchange, Exchange St., Driffield, E. Yorks, N . S. W., Australia. England. . , D o______General Stud B o o k ...... Weatherby & Sons, 15 Cavendish Sq., London, W. 1, England. Lincoln...... Flock Book of Lincoln Long- Lincoln Longwool Sheep Breeder’s Association Brian Shelley, D o______Jamaica Stud-B ook...... The Jockey Club of Jamaica, Sir George Seymour Seymour, wool Sheep. secretary, 184 High St., Lincoln, England. secretary, 10 Duke St., Kingston, Jamaica, B. W. I. Oxford Down___ Flock Book Oxford Down Oxford Down Sheep ' Breeders’ Association, L. E. Deacon, D o______Stud Book de Chile______Club Hlpico de Santiago, Alejandro Obolensky Dadi&n, secre­ Sheep. secretary, 18 Fir Tree Walk, Weston Favell, Northampton, tary, San Antonio 231, Santiago, Chile. England. D o______.... New Zealand Stud B o o k ...... New Zealand Racing Conference, A. M. McBe.ath, secretary, Romney Marsh... The New Zealand Romney New Zealand Romney Marsh 8heep Breeders’ Association, Dominion Bldg., Mercer and Wakefield Sts., Wellington, New Marsh Flock Book. Inc., Richard J. J. Campbell, secretary, 117 Kimbolton Rd., Zealand. Feilding, New Zealand. D o______.... Registro-Matricula de Cabal­ General Livestock Administration, The Minister of Agricul­ Ryeland_____ ... Ryeland Flock B ook...... Ryeland Flock Book Society, Ltd., Glynne Hastings, secre­ los de Pura Sangre. ture, Madrid, Spain. tary, 2 St. Nicholas St., Hereford, England. D o______Stud Book Français Registre Commission du Studbook Français de Pur Sang, M. Maze- Shropshire...... Shropshire Flock B o o k ...... Shropshire Sheep Breeders’ Association and Flock Book des Chevaux de Pur Sang. Sencier, Inspector General, Chief, Service des Haras, Min­ Society, Ivor Guy Mansell, secretary, College Hill, Shrews­ istry of Agriculture, 78 rue de Varenne (7), Paris, France. bury, Shropshire, England. . . .. _ .... D o ...... Libro Genealogico dei Cavalli Jockey Club Italiano, Comm. Gino Cavaniglia, secretary, Southdown...... Southdown Flock Book...... '. Southdown Sheep Society, Inc., R. G. Noakes, secretary, 33 di Furo Sangue. Piazza Montecitorio 121, Rome, Italy. High St., Maidstone, Kent, England. audy Jl 3, 1955 30, July Saturday, D o g s—Continued S h e e p —Continued

Name of breed Book of record By whom published .. _ Name of breed Book of record By whom published Schweizerische Kynologischen Gesellschaft, Carl Wittwer Suffolk Sheep Society, Harry A. Byford, secretary, 42 Westgate V a r io u s recog­ Schweizerisches Hunde- Suffolk Flock Book______... nized breeds. Stammbuch. secretary, Seestrasse 64, Kilchberg/Zurich, Switzerland. St., Ipswich, England. , , , • Svenska Kennelklubben, Capt. Ivan Swedrup, secretary, The Wensleydale Longwool Sheep Breeders Association, w . r>n ___ Svenska Kennelklubbens Wensleydale.____ Wensleydale Longwool Sheep Stambok. Linnegatan 25, Stockholm, Sweden. Flock Book. Dickinson, secretary, The Gardens, Ulverston, Lancashire, England. ’ _ Various recog­ New Zealand Flock B ook..— New Zealand Sheep Breeders’ Association, M. E. Lyons, secre­ Cats nized breeds, tary, P. 0 . Box 296, Christchurch, C. 1, New Zealand. rm ...... _ Flock Book for British Breeds The Australian Society of Breeders of British Sheep, H. T. C. of Sheep in Australia. Woodfull, secretary, Temple Court, 422 Collins St., Mel­ The Governing Council of the Cat Fancy, W. A. Hazeldine, bourne, C. 1, Australia. Long-haired and Register of the Governing short-haired. Council of the Cat Fancy. 1 Roundwood Way, Banstead, Surrey, England.

oats G (b) Breeds and 5465 books of record in breed: Provided further, FEDERAL REGISTER That no Kara­ Canada—(1) Animals generally. The kul sheep, Alpine goat, Nubian goat, or Saanen and Tog British Goat Society Herd British Goat Society, MisS M. F. Rigg, secretary, Diss, Nor­ books of record of the Canadian National genburg. Book (Saanen and Toggen- folk, England. horse of the American Saddle, Canadian burg Sections). Live Stock Records, Ottawa, Canada, of or Arabian breeds in Canada shall be which F. G. Hodgkin is Director, are rec­ certified under the Act as purebred un­ H ogs ognized for the following breeds: Pro­ less a pedigree certificate showing three vided, That no animals registered in the complete generations of known and re­ Canadian National Live Stock Records Irish Large White. Herd Book of Irish Large Royal Dublin Society, Horace H. Poole, registrar, Ball’s corded purebred ancestry of the par­ White Figs. Bridge, Dublin, Ireland. shall be certified under the act as pure­ bred unless such animals trace only to ticular breed involved, issued by the Gloucestershire Canadian National Live Stock Records, Old Spots_____ animals which are proved to the satisfac­ Large Black------\Herd Book of the National National Pig Breeders’ Association, R. F. Johnson, secretary, tion of the branch to be of the same is submitted for such animal. Large White_____ 1 pig Breeders’ Association. 69 Clarendon Road, Watford, Herts., England. Middle White____ Cattle Sheep Horses Hogs Goats _ Wessex Saddle­ back. Aberdeen-Angus. Blackface. American Saddle Horse. Berkshire. Alpine. Chester White. Angora. D ogs Ayrshire. Cheviot. Arabian. Brown Swiss. Corriedale. Belgian Draft. Duroc-Jersey. Nubian. Canadian. Cotswold. Canadian. Hampshire. Saanen. Dorset Horn Clydesdale Large Black. Toggenburg. B oxer...... Boxer-Zuchtbuch....— .—. Box-Klub e. V. Sitz München, Heinrich Zimmermann, presi­ Galloway. dent, 38 Otkerstrasse, München 9, Germany. Guernsey Hampshire. Hackney. Poland China. Karakul. Percheron. Tamworth. Dachshund_____ Teckel Stammbuch..------Deutscher Teckelklub e. V., Josef Chateau, studbook keeper, Hereford. Duisburg, Rhineland, Moselstrasse'7, Germany. Highland. Kerry Hill. Shetland Pony. Yorkshire. Shire. Foxhound Kennel Stud Book. Masters of Foxhounds Association, J. W-Fitzwilliam, secretary, Jersey. Leicester. Foxhound. 51 Victoria St., London, S. W. 1, England. Red Poll. Lincoln. Standardbred. Suffolk. Welsh Hound Stud Book. Welsh Hound Association, Islwyn E. E. Davies, Hon. secre­ Shorthorn. Merino. Do. tary, Berthddu, Llandinana, Montgomeryshire, East Wales. Shorthorn (Lincolnshire Oxford Down. Thoroughbred. / Welsh Pony and Cob. Reichs-Zuchtbuch (Abteil­ Verein für deutsche Schäferhunde (SV), Hanns Kremhelmer, Red). Rambouillet. German Shep- secretary, Ulmerstr. 3, Augsburg 3, Germany. Ryeland. herd. ung, Deutsche Schäfer­ Shropshire. hunde). Deutscher Doggen Club, Richard Staadt, president, Solingen- Soutndown. Great D a n e ...... Stammbuch für Deutsche Suffolk. Doggen. Ohligs, Ellerstrasse 25, Germany. , The Australian and NCw Zealand Greyhound Association, Greyhound.—.... Australian Greyhound Stud Book. Robert John Maidment, 349 Collins St., Melbourne, C. 1, Australia. . „ — . (2) Holstein-Friesian cattle in Can­ involved, issued by the Canadian Kennel Greyhound Stud Book. National Coursing Club, Sydney H. Dalton, secretary, 11 Club, Incorporated, is submitted for such Do. Haymarket, London, S. W. 1, England. ada. The Holstein-Friesian Association Irish Coursing Club, Arthur J. Morris, secretary, Davis Road, dog. Do. Irish Greyhound Stud B ook.. of Canada, Brantford, Ontario, Canada, Clonmel, Co. Tipperary, Ireland. of which G. M. Clemons is secretary and § 151.10 Recognition of additional Harrier and Beagle Stud Book. Association of Masters of Harriers and Beagles, J. Pawie, Hon. Harrier and secretary, Little Havers, Bishop’s Shortford, England. editor, is recognized for the Holstein- Beagle. breeds and books of record. Before a Rottweiler...... Reichs-Zuchtbuch (Abtei­ Allgemeiner Deutscher Rottweiler-Klub, Mrs. Josefine Rieble, Friesian breed registered in the Holstein- breed or a book of record shall be added lung; Rottweiler). secretary, Stuttgart-West, Vorsteigstrasse 5, Germany. Bernhardiner-Zuchtbuch...... St. Bemhards-Klub e. V., Franz Hraohowina, studbook keeper, Friesian Herd Book of that Association. to those listed in this part, the custodian St. Bernard...... München 12, Bergmannstrasse 35, Germany, (3) Dogs in Canada. The Stud Book of the book of record involved shall sub­ V arious recog- Irish Kennel Club Stud Book, trich TTonnAi pinh. Maud C atherine Fox. secretary. 23 Eden of the Canadian Kennel Club, Incorpo­ mit to the branch a complete set of the nized breeds. Quay, Dublin, C. 8, Ireland. D o ...... Kennel Club Studbook------English Kennel Club, E. Holland Buckley, secretary, 84 Pic­ rated (Canadian National Live Stock published volumes of that book up to cadilly, London, W. 1, England. Records) is recognized for all the breeds date of application, together with a copy Livre des Origines Français... Société Centrale Canine pour l’Amelieration des Races de Do. Chiens en France, Col. Raoul Nicole, administrative director, of dogs registered therein: Provided, of all rules and forms in force on said 3 Rue de Choisseul, Paris 2, France. Société Royale Saint-Hubert, R. Willocq, secretary, 391 Chaus­ That no dog so registered shall be cer­ date affecting the registration of animals Do. Livre des Origines de la Société Royale Saint- sée Saint-Pierre,'Brussels 4, Belgium. tified under the act as purebred unless in said book. Hubert. Norsk Kennelklubs Stambok. Norsk Kennel Klub, E. F. Gjersoe, Jr., secretary, Skippergaten a pedigree certificate showing three com­ The proposed revision would amend Do. 22, Oslo, Norway. x _ - ■ . . plete generations of known and recorded the definition of “purebred” to include Klub für Terrier, Günter Ruppert, secretary Kelsterbach Do. Reichs-Zuchtbuch Abteilune; Fachschaft ftir Terrier e. V. Main, Schone Aussicht 9, Postfach 23, Germany. purebred ancestry of the particular breed sheep of a recognized breed which orig- 5466 PROPOSED RULE MAKING lnaté in a flock for which available tember 13, 1955, for examination by sisting of three pilots and an additional breeding data establish that the flock interested persons in the Docket Section flight crew member, shall be governed by has been in existence at least ten years. of the Board, Room 5412, Department of the provisions of § 41.55. It would recognize the book of record Commerce Building, Washington, D. C. 4. A pilot to whom the provisions of of purebred Arabian and Thoroughbred Special Civil Air Regulation SR-386B paragraphs 2 and 3 are not applicable, horses entitled “Registro Genealogiço which terminates September 19, 1955, assigned to duty aloft for a total of 20 Nacional de Caballos de S. P. C.” and provides authority whereby a pilot may hours or less within a given month in would require that no Shetland or Welsh serve in more than one type of flight two-pilot crews with or without addi­ Pony shall be certified under the Act as crew without incurring any penalty in tional flight crew members, shall be gov­ purebred unless a pedigree certificate terms of maximum permissive flight erned by the provisions of § 41.56. showing three complete generations of duty. This authority has heretofore 5. A pilot assigned to each of two- known and recorded purebred ancestry been provided for an experimental period pilot, two-pilot and additional flight of the breed is submitted for such animal. with a view to the establishment of crew member, and three-pilot and addi­ The revision would also incorporate cer­ permanent rules for such crew assign­ tional flight crew member crews in a tain corrections in the names, custodian­ ments. given month, who is not governed by ship, and addresses of the associations The Civil Aeronautics Administration the provisions of paragraphs 2, 3, or 4, sponsoring or publishing books of record, has advised the Board that the regula­ shall be governed by the provisions of and make several other changes in the tion is a desirable one and not subject § 41.55. regulations for clarity. to abuse, and that it recommends that If is proposed that this régulation shall Any person who wishes to submit writ­ the authority granted by SR-386B be supersede Special Civil Air Regulation ten data, views, or arguments concerning continued. Since a proposed major re­ No. SR-386B and shall be effective for the proposed revision may do so by filing vision of Part 41 of the Civil Air Regu­ a period of one year. them with the Chief, Animal Inspection lations is being prepared for publication, This regulation is proposed under the and Quarantine Branch, Agricultural the Bureau considers that it is advisable authority of Title VI of the Civil Aero­ Research Service, United States Depart­ to extend the authority granted by SR- nautics Act of 1938, as amended. The ment of Agriculture, Washington 25, 386B for another year rather than to proposal may be changed in the light D. C., within fifteen days after the date incorporate this authority in currently of comment received in response to this of publication of this notice in the effective Part 41. During the develop­ notice of proposed rule making. F ed e r a l R e g is t e r . ment of the revision of Part 41 further (Sec. 205 (a), 52 Stat. 984; 49 U. S. C. 425 Done at Washington, D. C., this 25th consideration and discussion will be (a). Interpret or apply secs. 601-610, 52 day of July 1955. given concerning the permanent incor­ Stat. 1007-1012, as amended; 49 U. S. C. 551— poration of such a provision. 560) [ s e a l ] M. R. C l a r k s o n , This proposed regulation will not allow Acting Administrator > Dated at Washington, D. C., July 22, evasion of the stricter limitations appli­ 1955. Agricultural Research Service. cable to smaller crew combinations, but [P. R. Doc. 55-6118; Piled, July 29, 1955; will allow assignment of a pilot in any By the Bureau of Safety Regulation. 8:45 a. m.] given month to another type of crew [ s e a l ] J o h n M . C h a m b e r l a in , combination without additional flight Director. time limitation if he flies not more than CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD 20 hours in the type of crew to which [P. R. Doc. 55-6180; Piled, July 29, 1955; the more restrictive flight time limita­ 8:50 a. m.] [ 14 CFR Part 41 1 tions apply and if such assignment is not [Draft Release 55-18] interrupted more than once during such month. INTERSTATE COMMERCE C ertification a n d O p e r a t io n R u l e s f o r In view of the foregoing, it is proposed COMMISSION S c h e d u l e d A ir • C a r r ie r O p e r a t io n s to promulgate a Special Civil Air Regu­ O u t s i d e C o n t in e n t a l L i m i t s o f U. S. lation to read as follows: [ 49 CFR Ch. I 1 FLIGHT TIME LIMITATIONS FOR PILOTS NOT 1. Contrary provisions of § 41.57 of [Ex Parte 195J REGULARLY ASSIGNED TO ONE TYPE OF the Civil Air Regulations notwithstand­ R e v is e d R u l e s o f P r o c e d u r e B efore CREW ing, the following rules shall apply to the t h e C o m m i s s i o n monthly and quarterly flight time limi­ Pursuant to authority delegated by the tations of pilots assigned to combinations EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING Civil Aeronautics Board to the Bureau of of two-pilot crews, two-pilot and addi­ WRITTEN STATEMENTS Safety Regulation, notice is hereby given tional flight crew member crews, or J u l y 27, 1955. that the Bureau will propose to the three-pilot and additional flight crew Board an extension of the provisions of member crews. In its order and notice of proposed Special Civil Air Regulation SR-386B 2. A pilot who is assigned to duty aloft rule making in the above proceeding, which authorizes a pilot to serve in more for more than 20 hours in two-pilot dated May 2, 1955, the Commission set than one type of flight crew without crews in a given month, or whose assign­ September 6, 1955, as the date by which incurring any penalty in terms of maxi­ ment in such crews is interrupted more any interested party may file with this mum permissive flight duty. than once in the month by assignment Commission written statements contain­ Interested persons may participate in to a crew consisting of two or more pilots ing data, views, or arguments concerning the making of the proposed rule by sub­ and an additional flight crew member, the proposed revised rules (20 F. R. 3347). mitting such written data, views, or shall be governed by the provisions of Upon request of the Association of arguments as they may desire. Com­ § 41.54. Interstate Commerce Commission Prac­ munications should be submitted in dup­ 3. Except for a pilot coming within titioners the date has been extended, so licate to the Civil Aeronautics Board, the provisions of paragraph 2, a pilot that any interested party may file on or attention Bureau of Safety Regulation, before January 6, 1956, with this Com­ Washington 25, D. C. In order to insure who is assigned to duty aloft for more mission such written statements. their consideration by the Board before than 20 hours in two-pilot and additional taking further action on the proposed flight crew member crews in a given { s e a l ] H arold D . M cC o y , rule, communications must be received by month, or whose assignment in such Secretary. September 9,1955. Copies of such com­ crews is interrupted more than once in [P. R. Doc. 55-6179; Filed, July 29, 1955; munications will be available after Sep- the month by assignment to a crew con­ 8:50 a. m.] Saturday, July 30, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 5467

NOTICES

(Unsurveyed, but what will probably be SE (4 NE (4 NE(4 • SEy4NWy4NE»4, SEV4’ d e p a r t m e n t o f t h e in t e r io r when surveyed:) sw»4Nwy4NE^, Ey4Nwy4Swy4NEy4, wyaNEy4Sw%NEy4; Bureau of Land Management T. 20 N., R. 18 E., Sec. 8, SEy4NW»4, Nwy4Nwy4, n e ^ s w ^ S ec. 33, SW»/4; jN w y4, sw &ne&nw k. I d a h o Sec. 32, SEi/4, NW&; Sec. 29, SWy4; Lightfoot Bar Recreation Area NOTICE OF PROPOSED WITHDRAWAL AND Sec. 30, NEÎ4; T 3 N R 12 E RESERVATION OF LANDS Sec. 19, SW ^. Sec. 24, NEy4NEV4, E»/2Ey2NW%NE>4. J u l y 20,1955. (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be T. 3 N., R. 13 E., The United States Department of when surveyed:) Sec. 18, Wy2NWy4SE%, SE^NE^SW ft, SEy4Swy4, SEy4swy4Swy4: Agriculture has filed an application, T. 20 N„ R. 17 E., s e c . 19, i^Ey4 N w y 4 N w y 4 , w y i,N w y 4 N W ^ . Serial No. Idaho 05281, for the with­ Sec. 24, SE}4, SW&; drawal of the lands described below, Sec. 25, NW 14; Wood River Campground and Picnic Area from all forms of appropriation under Sec. 26, NE%, NWy4: Sec. 27, NEÎ4, SW»4; (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be the General Mining Laws, subject to ex­ when surveyed:) isting valid claims. The applicant desires Sec. 28, SE^4; the land for administrative sites, public Sec. 33, NE»4, SEft. T. 5 N., R. 17 E., service sites, recreation areas, or for (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be Sec. 3, w y2swy4swi,4; when surveyed:) s e c . 4, s y 2s w i 4 N w y 4 , sy2sEy4Nwy4. n *4 ’ other public purposes as set forth speci­ Nwy4swy4, Ny2NEy4sw%, sy2swy4 fically with regard to each area or T. 19 N., R. 17 E., n e »4, Ny2SEy4, n e ^ s w ^ s e ^ , N ya description, within the Salmon, Saw­ Sec. 4, NE 14, SW 14; SE!ASEy4, se^ se^ se ^. Sec. 9, NW »4. tooth and Targhee National Forests. Baker Creek Recreation Area For a period of 30 days from the date Hunter Creek Administrative Site of publication of this notice, persons (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be T. 1 N ., R . 11 E., when surveyed:) having cause may present their objec­ Sec. 15, SW%NE%, W%SE%SE%, tions in writing to the undersigned offi­ NWÎ4SE$4, NE 14SE 14. T. 5 N., R. 16 E., cial of the Bureau of Land Management, Sec. 9, Ni/2NEi4. Deer Park Administrative Site Department of the Interior. Lodgepole Campground If circumstances warrant it, a public T. 2 N„ R. 12 E., Sec. 6, S%SW%; ' (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be hearing will be held at a convenient when surveyed:) time and place, which will be announced. Sec. 7, N%NW14. The determination of the Secretary Liberal Administrative Site T. 6 N., R. 17 E., Sec. 23, E^SWV4. NW ^SW ft. SWy4NWi4. on the application will be published in T. 3 N., R. 15 E., the F ed e r a l R e g is t e r . A separate notice Sec. 33, SE 14NW 14, Ei/2SW Î4NW V4, N E 1^ Barr Gulch Recreation Area will be sent to each interested party of NE 14SW 14, e %s w %. T. 4 N., R. 16 E., record. Bowery Administrative Site s e c . 28, sy2swy4swy4. NEy4swy4swy4. The lands involved in the application NEytSEy4swy4. T. 8 N., R. 17 E., are: Willow Flat Public Recreation Area B oise Meridian, Idaho Sec. 31, Wy2SEi4, Ey2SW y,. Swan Basin Administrative Site Bald Mountain Lookout Administrative Site T. 5 N., R. 18 E., Sec. 28, Sy2SEV4SEi4, SE^SW ^SE^; T. 15 N., R . 25 E., T. 4 N., R. 17 E., Sec. 33, Ny2NEy4NEy4, NW»4 NEy4 . Sec. 35, SE^SE^. Sec. 27, SW 14 NE 1,4 NE 14, NW^NW^SE^ N E 14, E y2 SE V4 NW % NE 1,4, N E ^ N E Î4 Chaparral Public Recreation Area Meadow Lake Public Service Site SW y4 NE 14. T. 3 N., R. 10 E., (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be Iron Mountain Administrative Site Sec. 12, Lot 1. w hen su rv ey ed : ) Abbott Public Recreation Area T 2 N R 12 E T. 13 N., R . 26 E., S ec. ’ 4. SW%NWV4, Wy2NWÎ4SEy,NWV4. T. 3 N., R. 10 E., Sec. 24, SW>/4 . L o t 3; Sec. 12, Lot 4. Haynes Lake Public Service Site Sec. 5, S y2 SE 14 NE 14, SftN%SE%NE}4. East Fork Recreation Area T. 19 N., R . 23 E., Warm Springs Creek Administrative Site Sec. 4, SE^SE^: T. 4 N., R. 19 E., T. 4 N., R. 17 E., Sec. 9, NE % NE V4. Sec. 23, Sy2SWy4NWV4. NEV4SWy4NWi/4. ’sec. 16, sy2swy4SEi/4, SE%SEy4Swy4; Ny2SEV4Nwy4, sw y4SEy4Nwy4, SEy* Poison Creek Administrative Site Sec. 21, NW ^NE^, Ei/aNE^NW^. NEy4Nwy4, Nwy4swy4NEy4, s & n w ^ T. 18 N., R. 21 E. Big Smoky Pasture Administrative Site n e i/4 , s w 14 NE 14 NE 14 • Copper Creek Recreation Area (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be T 3 N R 13 E when surveyed:) s e c . 1 , swy4NW ^, Nw»4swy4, wy2SEi,4 T. 3 N., R. 21 E„ Sec. 2, Lot X, S 1/2N 1/2N i£ . NW%; Sec. 11, SEy4SWy4NWy4, SW%SEV4NW»4, Sec. 2, Ey2Ey2NE^SEi/4. wy2NEy4swy4, Nwy4SEV4swy4. Eya Lake Creek Administrative Site The Narrows Recreation Area SE%SW%- T. 20 N., R. 21 E., Little Smokey Recreation Area T. 3 N., R. 14 E., Sec. 32, SE*4. s e c . 29, swy4swy4Nwy4, wy2Nwy4Swy4; T. 3 N., R. 14 E., Jesse Creek Administrative Site Sec. 30, Ey2NEy4SEV4, SW ^NE^. Sec. 32, W»/2NWy4- T. 21 N., R. 21 E., Pries Hot Spring Recreation Area Canyon Recreation Area Sec. 2, Lot 1, S%N%NK* T. 3 N., R. 14 E., T. 3 N., R. 13 E., Forney-Yellowjacket Highway, Roadside Zone Sec. 19, Wy2SE^SEV4, E^SW ^SE^, Lot 6. Sec. 1, Lots 3, 4. T. 4 N., R. 13 E., A strip of land 200 feet on each side of the Pioneer Picnic Recreation Area Sec. 36, Sy2SW ^. center line of the Forney-Yellowjacket Forest T. 2 N., R. 14 E., Big Horn Recreation Area Road through the following legal sub­ Sec. 19, NW%SE(4, W ^NE^SE^, SW % division s: n e 14* N y2sEV4Nw»4. Ey2w y 2, N w y 4 T. 3 N., R. 12 E., (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be NE>/4 . Sec. 17, NW ftNW ft. when surveyed:) Boardman Recreation Area Lime Creek Recreation Area T. 19 N., R. 18 E., Sec. 3, NWy4; T 3 N R 13 E T . 1 N „ R . 11 E., Sec. 4, NE^. Sec. 7. NE^NE&NE^, SyaNW&NE&NEft, Sec. 3, Sy2SEV4SWi4. 5468 NOTICES

Bird Creek Recreation Area s e >/4, N w y 4S E % N w y4, n e %s w 44, N ya Red Rock Administrative Site N w y 4s w y 4, SEy4N w y 4 s w y 4, s y 2s w y 4 T. 3 N., R. 11 E., T. 15 N., R. 42 E., NWÎ4. NE%SWi4 NWy4 , SE î4N W y4N W y4; Sec. 5, Lot 8. S ec. 22, N y2NWy4NWy4, SW^NW&NWV*. sec. 13, sy4 swy4. Willow Creek Recreation Area T. 10 N., R. 13 E., Reas Park Administrative Site Sec. 35, Sy2SW Î4SW i4. T. 3 N., R. 11 E., T. 12 N., R. 43 E., Sec. 9, Lot 7; Warm Springs Creek No. 1 Public Service Sec. 1, Lots 1, 2, SÎ4NE1/4. Sec. 10, W ^NW ^SW '/i. S ite T. 4 N., R. 17 E„ Big Springs Lookout Administrative Site Paradise Recreation Area Sec. 31, Lots 6, 9, 10, Wy2SW Î4N E y4, T. 14 N.j R. 44 E., T. 3 N., R. 13 E., E y2Ey2sE y 4N w y 4, n y2 n w y n w 14 s e y4 . sec. 27, SE14SW14, wy2swy4SEy4. Sec. 2, W%SE%NEi4, NE^SW ^NE^, WJ/2 E&NE%SB}4. Corral Creek No. 1 Public Service Site Icehouse Administrative Site (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be Big Smoky Recreation Area T. 13 N., R. 42 E., when surveyed : ) S e c . 6, N W 14SE 14, Ey2SE y4. T. 3 N., R. 13 E., T. 5 N., R. 19 E., Fish Creek R. S. Administrative Site Sec. 9, Si/aSW^SE^, W ^SE^SE^, NES4 Sec. 20, SEyiSE^, Ey2sw y 4 S E y 4 ; SE%SE%; Sec. 29, NE 14NE 14, EyNWy4NE»4, NE^, T. 4 N., R. 42 E., Sec. 10, SW14NE14, Nwy4SEy4NE»4. sec. i8, NEy4swy4, Ey2Nwy4. wy2Nwy4 SE14. Bounds Recreation Area Warm Springs Creek No. 2 Public Service Site Dry Canyon Administrative Site T. 3 N., R. 13 E., T. 3 N., R. 15 E., sec. io, sy2Ny2, Ny2sy2. T. 3 N., R. 43 E., Sec. 15, SW ^NW yNW y, S%SEy4NWy4 Sec. 31, Lot 9; Baumgartner Recreation Area N W Î4, N y2 NE »4 S W y4 N W %, N y2SEy4 Sec. 32, Lots 6, 7. Nwy4, sy2sy2NEy4Nwy4, swy4swy4 T. 3 N., R. 12 E., 'NW1ANE14, NWy4NW 14SW 14NEy4 . Wheaton Administrative Site Sec. 7, SWy4SE%SEyl, SW14SE1/4, SW 14 NW14SE14, sy2NE^sw%, Ny2sE»/4sw ^ , Aspen Grove Public Service Site T. 3 N., R. 42 E., SE^SE^SWi4; Sec. 10, Lot 8; T. 5 N., R. 18 E.f Sec. 11, Lot 3. Sec. 18, NW ^NE^NE^, N%NW%NE%. Sec. 11, SE>4. Alturas Lake Public Service Site Warm Springs Trailer Camp Public Service Jackson R. S. Administrative Site T. 7 N., R. 13 E., S ite T . 11 N ., R. .41 E., Sec. 24, SE% SE 14 SE %; T. 4 N., R. 17 E., Sec. 34, NÉy4. Sec. 25, NE 14, SE%, NE^SW 1/«, SE^SW ^, s e c . 22, fr w y 4 N w y 4 . s w y 4sw y 4 ; North Fork Administrative Site Easley Public Service Site Sec. 26, S%SEi4SE*4, S^SW ^SE^, Sy2 T. 14 N., R. 43 E., SE% SW y4; . (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be Sec. 35, wysEy4NEy4. Sec. 35, Ny2NEV4, SWy4NEy4, NW 'i; when surveyed : ) Sec. 36, NWy4 NW>/4 . Buffalo Administrative Site T. 7 N., R. 14 E„ T. 5 N., R. 16 E., Sec. 19, Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; Sec. 10, NW%. T. 13 N., R. 43 E., Sec. 27, Lots 7, 8, SE 14S W ^4, W y2SEy4. Sec. 20, Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, W&SW%NE%, High Creek Corral Public Service Site NW y4N W ^ S E y 4; Fiat Rock Administrative Site Sec. 29, Lot 1, SW‘/4NWy4, W y-NE^NW ^; T. 4 N., R. 13 E„ Sec. 30, Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, N% NE 14 SE '4. Sec. 3, NWy4SWy4, Lot 6. T. 14 N., R. 43 E., Sec. 27, SE 14NW 14. Ny2NEy4SWy4, NW'/4 Pettit Lake Public Service Site Trail Creek Administrative Site swy4, swy4Nwy4. T. 8 N., R. 13 E. T. 3 N., R. 46 E., s e c . 30, SEy4Nwy4, swy4NEy4. Decoster Administrative Site (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be when surveyed:) Canyon Creek Administrative Site T. 7 N., R. 45 E., Sec. 10, sy2SE»4; Sec. 35, Ey2NEy4SEy4, EySE^NEy, N V2 T. 5 N., R. 42 E., Sec. 15, Ny2NEî4. NWV4SE 14, NW»4NEi4SEy4, sy2swy, Sec. 25, Wy2NWy4, Lots 2, 3. Grandview Administrative Site NEV4, SW ^SEyNE^; Cold Springs Administrative Site Sec. 36, Ny2NE% , N y2NWy4, s w y 4, S E 14, T.' 6 N., R . 43 E., T. 15 N., R. 43 E„ w y s w y N w y i . s e c . 25, L ots 3, 4, w y2SEy4, Ey2swy4. T. 8 N., R. 14 E„ Sec. 28, SE 14SE 14. Sec. 31, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, NWy4NWy4 Rainey Creek Administrative Site SE y4. Conant Administrative Site T. 8 N., R. 45 E„ T. 2 N., R. 44 E., Little Redfish Lake Public Service Site Sec. 21, Ny4Sy2. Sec. 33, Sy2SEV4NEy4; sec. 34, swy4Nwy4 , N^SE^Nwy, sy4 T. 10 N., R. 13 E., Fall River Administrative Site Sec. 26, Lots 7, 8, 9, 10; neî4NW)4. Sec. 35, Lots 1, 2, NWy4NWy4NE%. T. 9 N., R. 45 E., Hawley Gulch Administrative Site Sec. 31, NE 14SW 14, Lots 3, 4, 5. Redfish Lake Public Service Site T. 4 N., R. 41 E., Warm River Butte Lookout Administrative Sec. 25, Lots 1, 2, S^N E ^. T. 9 N., R. 13 E. S ite (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be T. 10 N., R. 44 E., Pony Creek Administrative Site when surveyed:) Sec. 22; SySE^SE& j Sec. 27, NEy4NE»4. T. 6 N., R. 43 E., S ec. 2, N y2NW%NW»/4. Ey2NW»/4, S E ^ S W y , Sec. 34, SW %. N w y 4 , w y 2SWi4, NW^SEiiSWyi; Echo Canyon Administrative Site Moody Creek Administrative Site Sec. 3, SEiiSW ySW y, W ySE^SW y, S % T. 15 N., R. 44 E., NE»/4SWy4, NEyNEySWy, SE^SE^ Sec. 31, Lot 9; T. 4 N., R. 42 E., n w »/4, s w y 4 SE% , s y 2N w y4 SEy4 , n e »4 s e c . 32, swy4swy4, Nwy4swy4. Sec. 4, Lots 2, 6, 7. NWyiSEyi, NEy4NEV4: s e c . 10, Ey2N E & , Ey2SEy4, w y 2s w y 4 s w y 4, Arangee Administrative Site Garns Point Administrative Site syNwyswy, NEy4NWV4SW y4, e >/2 T. 13 N., R. 43 E., T 4 N., R. 43 E., s w y 4N w y 4 , Ey2N w % N w y 4; Sec. 6, SWy4 of Lot 7; Sec. 2, Lots 1, 2, SV2NEy4. S ec. 1 1 , w y 2NW»/4NWy4; Sec. 7, w y2 of Lot 1, Lot 2, Lot 3. Sec. 15, NEy4NE%, Wy2SEy4N E ^ , E ^ Elk Butte Lookout Administrative Site s w y 4NEy4, Ey2N w y 4N E i4 , N w y s E y i , Shotgun Administrative Site N w y 4NEV4SEy4, N w y 4SWV4NEy4, S E 14 T. 11 N., R. 43 E., sw y, SE%swy 4s w y 4 , w y 2N w y 4NW%; T. 13 N., R. 42 E., Sec. 34, Ey4SEy4NWy4, WyfcSW&NE^* S ec. 16, S y S E ^ S W y , NE»/4SEy4SW y4, Sec. 35, NW»/4. NEy4NEy4Swy4, Nwy4NWî4SEy4* N w y 4s w y 4 SEy4 , s % N w y 4SEy4, NEy* Sawtelle Administrative Site High Point Lookout Administrative Site NWy4SE%, SEy4N E ^ , E% NEy4NEy4; Sec. 21, Ey2NEy4NEy4, NEy4 SE>/4NEy4, T. 14 N., R. 43 E., . T. 11 N., R. 42 E., w y 2SEy4NEy4 , s e ^ s w ^ n e ^ , N ^ N w y i Sec. 10, NE»4NEÎ4. Sec. 19, Lot 2. Saturday, July 30, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 5469

Bishop Mountain Lookout Administrative Teton Highway F. H. No. 38 {State Highway T. 11 N., R. 42 E., S ite No. 33) Sec. 1, Lot 5, swy4NEy4; S ec. 2, E y2; T. 12 N .f R . 42 E., A strip of land 500 feet wide on each side s e c . 1 1 , w y2Ei4, Ey£NEy4 ? Sec. 30, Lot 4; of the center line of Forest Highway No. 38 Sec. 14, Ey2W ^, Wy^-Eyi; Sec. 31, L ot 1. (State Highway No. 33) through the follow­ s e c . 23, Nwy4, Ey2swy4, wy2SEy4; T 12 N., R. 41 E., ing subdivisions: s e c . 26, E»/2wy2, wy2Ey2; Sec. 25, Ey2SEi/4S E i4 . T. 3 N., R. 46 E., S ec. 34, Ey2. Worm River Fish Hatchery Administrative Sec. 30, Ey2NWy4NE>4, Wy2NEi4NEV4, S ite SE&NE^, NEy4SEi4; Forest Highway No. 35 Reynolds Pass Sec. 29, SW»4; A strip of land 300 feet wide on each side T. 10 N., R . 44 E., Sec. 32, NEi4NWy4, Lots 1, 2. of the center line of Forest Highway No. 35 Sec. 9, E Î4.SE% SE Î4 î sec. io, sei^sw ^ nw^, NW‘/4swy4, wy2 Rock Creek Road F. H. No. 38 (Cave Falls through the following subdivisions: NEy4swy4, Ny2swy4swy4, swy4sw>4; Highway, Idaho No. 47) T. 16 N., R. 42 E., swyi. Sec. 14, Lots 1, 2, 3, SWy4SEy4; A strip of land 500 feet wide on each side Sec. 23, NEy4; Snake River Butte Administrative Site of the center line of Forest Highway No. 36 s e c . 24, sw y4Nwy4,, Ny2swy4, SEy4. (Cave Falls Highway Idaho No. 47) through T. 9 N., R. 42 E., Sec. 10, wy2SE%, Sy2SW»ANE^, Ey2SEV4 the following subdivisions: Forest Highway No. 33, Idaho-Montana swy4. • T. 9 N„ R. 44 E., {U. S. 91) Corral Administrative $ite sec. 23, sy2sw y4 . SW 14SE 14, Ny2SEV4; A strip of land 500 feet wide on each side S ec. 24, Ny2sy2, SEy4NEy4. of the center line of Forest Highway No. 33 T. 3 N., R. 45 E., T. 9 N., R. 45 E., through the following subdivisions: Sec. 19, NE 14. S ec. 10, s y 2, S ^ N E i/i; T. 12 N., R. 36 E., Mahogany Administrative Site Sec. 11, N%: Sec. 12, Ny2Ny2; Sec. 10, NE»4NEy4; T. 4 N., R . 44 E., Sec. 15, Ny2NWy4NW»4; S ec. 11, W 14W&; Sec. 14, SWy4NE}4, Lots 1, 2, 5. S ec. 16, s w y 4 , s e ^ n w ^ , NEy4; Sec. 14, NW 14. Sec. 17, Lots 6, 7, 8, SEy4SEi4; T. 13 N., R. 36 E., Willow Creek Administrative Site Sec. 18, Sy2SW%SEV4, Lot 6; Sec. 9, SE%; T. 13 N., R. 41 E., Sec. 19, Lot 2, SEy4NW%, SE^NE^NW »4, s e c . 15, w y 2w y £ : Sec. 3, Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, S W ^ N E ^ , SE}4 NW14NE14. Sec. 22, Wy2, SW%SEi4 . Nwy4. T. 9 N., R. 46 E., S ec. 27, Ey2NWy4, Eya. Sec. 7, Ny2Ny2; Kilgore Administrative Site Sec. 6, Lot 1; Warm River Recreation Area T. 13 N., R . 38 E., Sec. 5, Lot 1. T. 9 N., R. 44 E.. Sec. 27, SE 14, Ey2SW%. Yellowstone Park Highway U. S. 191 {Forest s e c . 7 , L o ts 2, 3, w y2SEy4Nwy4, w y2NEy4 Button Butte Administrative Site Highway No. 34) SW *4. T. 13 N., R. 39 E., A strip of land 500 feet wide on each side Bear Gulch Recreation Area Sec. 5, S E 14. of the center line of Forest Highway No. 34 T. 10 N., R. 44 E., through the following subdivisions: Huntley Canyon Administrative Site s e c . 30, sy2sy2SEy4; T. 9 N., R. 44 E., Sec. 31, NE»4; T. 12 N., R. 36 E., Sec. 5, NWy4NWi4; Sec. 32, NW&. Sec. 15, NW ^SE^, sy£SEy4. Sec. 6, E>/2, Ey2SWVi, SW 14SW 14; Medicine Lodge Administrative Site Sec. 7, Lot 1. Riverside Recreation Area T. 10 N„ R. 44 E., T. 13 N„ R . 34 E., T. 11 N., R. 42 E., Sec. 19, SW»4; Sec. 23, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, SW'ANE^, Sec. 34, Sy2SEî4SEy4, NE^SE^SE^; Sec. 29, SW%SWy4; Sec. 35, Wy2SWV4SW^, NE^SW^SW^, SEy4SEy4; s e c . 30, Ny2, Ny2sEy4, Ny2sy2SE^; Sec. 24. Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Nwy4swy4, W 1/2NE 1/4SW>/4 , SEÎ4 NW y4 , Sec. 31, Ey2SEy4; Ey2swy4Nwy4, Ey2NEy4N w y i, w y 2s w y 4 S ec. 32, Wy2SW»/4. Little Pine Creek Recreation Area NE ^4 , NW y, NE 14. T. 10 N., R. 43 E., T. 3 N., R. 44 E., Idaho Hollow Administrative Site s e c . 2, swy4swy4; S ec. 3, Sy2Ny2, NEi/iSW ^, SEy4; S ec. 24, sy2NEy4. T. 13 N., R. 35 E., Sec. 4, Lot 2, Sy2NEV4; Pine Basin Winter Spbrts Recreation Area Sec. 1, SEy4 . Sec. 10, NEy4NE%; T. 13 N., R. 36 E., S ec. 11, N y2; T. 2 N., R. 44 E., Sec. 6, L ot 6. sec. 12, sy2Nwyi, wy2SEy4, Ey2swy4; Sec. 6, Lot 6, SEy4SWy4: Spencer Administrative Site Sec. 13, Ry2. Sec. 7, Lots 1, 2, 3, E»/2NWy4. T. 11 N., R. 43 E., T. 2 N., R. 43 E., T. 12 N., R. 36 E., Sec. 8, wy2; S e c . 12, Ey2NEV4, NEy4SEy4. Sec. 13, SWV4. s e c . 17, wy2, SW^SEy4; Sheep Creek Recreation Area Victor-Irwin Highway F. H. No. 37 {Idaho Sec. 20, Ey2NW%, E y2; State Highway No. 31) s e c . 28, w y 2N w y4, s w y 4 ; T . 1 S., R . 45 E.; S e c . 29, Ey2NE y4; s e c . 5, L ots 1 , 2, sy2NEy4, SEy4; A strip of land 300 feet on each side of Sec. 33, NEV4NWV4, Wy2NEy4, SE ^. Sec. 4, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; the center line of Forest Highway No. 37, T. 13 N., R. 43 E., Sec. 3, Lots 3, 4. th ro u g h the following legal .subdivisions: s e c . 2, Ey2w y 2, w y 2Ey2 . T. 1 N„ R. 45 E., T. 14 N., R. 43 E., T. 2 N., R. 43 E., Sec. 31, sy2SEi4; Sec. 24, N%SWy4. S ec. 32, S y 2S»/2. Sec. 1, SEi4SEi,4: T. 15 N., R. 44 E., Sec. 12, SWi/4, NW 14, N y2N E ^ . Sec. 7, NW>4. Palisade Creek Recreation Area T. 2 N„ R. 44 E., T. 16 N., R. 44 E., T . 1 N ., R . 44 E., S ec. 3 1, N y2SE»4, s y 2NEy4; Sec. 6, Lots 2, 3, 5, NEi4SW 1/4 ,

Lower Palisade Lake Recreation Area Frasier Reservoir Public Service Site Sec. 17, Lots 1, 8, 9, 10, 12, SEi4SWy4l SW »4 SE14 ,E y 2 SE %; T. 1 N., R. 45 E., T. 13 N., R. 37 E., Sec. 18, Lots 10, 11; Sec. 3, SE%SW%, SW&SKJi. K&BE&l. S ec. 1, S y2; Sec. 19, Lots 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, E^N E %, SWy4 Sec. 9, N W 14SEV4, W y2NEy4S E i4 , Ny2SW»4 S ec. 2, SE>/4; NEy4 , sEi4Nwy4, Ey2sw y 4 , SE14 ; Sec. 11, Ny2NE*4; SE14, NEi4SEi4SW%, Ei/2NEy4SW%, Sec. 20, All; Sec. 12, Ny2. Sy2SW%NEi4, SE»4NE%; Sec. 21, All; Sec. 10, Ny2SWi4NW%, S%liW%NW^, Big Springs Public Service Site Sec. 22, All; NE1/4NW1/4. Sec. 23, Lot 4, W^NTW^, NWi/4SWy4; Upper Palisade Lake Recreation Area T. 13 N., R. 44 E., S ec. 28, Ny2NW%, swy4Nwy4; Sec. 4, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, SW 14NE 14, s y 2N W y4. S ec. 29, L o ts 1, 2, N%NT%; T . 1 N ., R . 45 E., SW 14, NWy4SEy4, Ey2SEiy4; Sec. 30, Lot 1, Ny2NEy4, NE^NW ^. Sec. 2, Lots 5, 6; Sec. 5, All; Sec. 11, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, NE^SW^NW^; Sec. 3, SW}4, Sy2S E }4. Buffalo River Public Service Site S ec. 12, L ot 1, N y2N W % SW i4. T. 14 N., R. 44 E., T. 12 N., R. 44 E., sec. 27, w y 2s w y 4 , N w y 4 , NEy4s w y 4; West Pine Creek Recreation Area Sec. 6, Lots 1, 2, 3, A, 5, SEy4NWy4, SE>/4 Sec. 28, All; NEy4. T. 3 N., R. 44 E., Sec. 29, Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 11, E ^ E y 2, NW'/4 T. 13 N., R. 43 E., Sec. 19, S^SE^; NE%; Sec. 24, Lots 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, NEy4, N^NWy4, -S ec. 20, s y 2s w v 4; Sec. 30, Lot 1; Ny2swy4sw y4, SEy4swy4, swy4SE»/4; Sec. 29, w y2; Sec. 32, Lots 1, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, Sec. 25, NEy4, Ey2NWy4, NEy4SEy4. Sec. 30, Ey2N E i4 . SE1/4SEV4; T. 13 N., R. 44 E„ Sec. 33, Lots 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, N W % N E}4, Sec. 19, Lots 1, 2, 3, 11, 12, Ny2NEy4, NEy4 Cold Spring Recreation Area NE 14NW 14» s y 2 ; NW 14, SE 14SW!/4, SWy4SE%; T. 4 N., R. 42 E., Sec. 34, Lots 1, 2, E^NW ^, SW ^. Sec. 20, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, NEy4, NW>A, Sec. 30, Lot 1, NE&NW^, NWViNE^. Island Park Public Service Site NEy4Swy4, Ny2SEy4; Table Rock Recreation Area Sec. 29, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, NW^NWyi, Sy2 T. 12 N„ R. 42 E., NW14, sy2NEy4; T. 4 N., R. 41 E„ Sec. 3, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, W ^SW ^; Sec. 30, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, NE&NE^, Ny2SEy4, Sec. 35, Sy2NEi4, SE 14. Sec. 4, SE%; NE14SW1 4 ;- Osborne Spring Recreation Area Sec. 8, S E 14; S ec. 3 1, L ots 1, 3, 4, Ey2sw y4, SEy4. Sec. 9, SWi4, NE^4; T. 11 N., R. 43 E., Sec. 17, Ny2NW%; Mill Creek Public Service Site Sec. 25, SW1ASWV4, Ey2SW y4, S E ^ . T. 13 N., R. 42 E., (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be T. 12 N., R. 43 E., Sec. 13, SE»4. when surveyed:) Sec. 3, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Sy2N»^, S% ; T. 13 N. R. 43 E. s e c . 5, Ey2w y2, w '/2sw y 4, n w ^ n w ^ ; Sec. 4, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Sy2N y2 , S & ; sec. 7, Lot 4,’’NEy4, Ey2Nwy4, Ey2Nwy4 Sec. 6, Wy2SE^, SE^SE^. Sec. 5, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, Nwy4, Ey2swy4, SEy4; SEy4NE»4 Ey2swy4, sw ^ sw ^ , se& sec. 8, Nwy4Nwy4, s%Nwy4, swy4; Indian Creek Public Service Site SE&; Sec. 17, Los 2, 3, *4, 5, SWy4NWy4; T. 2 S., R. 46 E.; S ec. 8, Lots 1,2,3,4, 6, 7,10, Ey,NEy4, SW*4 Sec. 18, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, S^NEy4, Sec. 8, Ny2SEi4, SW^SEi/4; n e %. w y 2N w y 4 , N w y 4s w y 4 , NEy4sE y 4 ; SEy4Nwy4. Ey-swyi, Ny2SEy4. Sec. 9, Sy2Sy2NW^4, NW'/iSW'/i, N%NE^4 Sec. 9, All; SW'/i, Ni/2Ny2SEi4, S ^ N E ^ . Sec. 17, Lots 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, NE^NE^. SE 14 Flat Rock Public Service Site n w ‘/4; w y 2Nwy4 , Nwy4 sw y 4 , Ey2 SEy4; T. 14 N., R. 43 E., Blowout Canyon Public Service Site Sec. 18, SE^SE%; Sec. 25, All; T. 1 S ., R . 46 E., Sec. 19, Lot 10, SEV4; Sec. 26, All; Sec. 31, Lots 3, 4, N E ^ SW ^, Ny2 SE»4. Sec. 20, Lots 1, 2, 3, NE»4, Sy 2NW y4, Sec. 32, Lots 1, 3, Ey2NEy4; SW^4; Sec. 33, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Ny2N^, Green Timber Public Service Site S ec. 30, L o ts 3, 4, 5, 6 , 7, 8 , Ey2w y2, E%t SEy4NEy4, n e ^ s w ^ , sy2swy4, swy4 Sec. 31, L o ts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 , Ey2NW}4, NE^ SEy4 ; T. 9 N., R. 44 E., sw y 4, Ey2; Sec. 34, Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, N % N % NW % SEy4, Sec. 26, NWi4. Sec. 32, W%. SE% SEy4; - Lamont Public Service Site T. 13 N., R. 42 E., Sec. 35, Lot 2, NWy4NWy4NEy4, SW>/4 Sec. 25, sy 2sy2, Ny2SW14, Lot 8; swy4Nw»4, Ny2swy4Nwy4, ne^ne^ T. 8 N., R. 45 E., Sec. 35, NEiA, SW ft. swy;, s%NEy4swy4, s%sy2NWi4swy4, Sec. 28, Sy2sy 2SWi/4; T. 13 N., R. 43 E., NW 14NW 14, Lot 7, Ny2NEi4NWy4, SE'/4 S ec. 33, N»/2N y2N W ^ . Sec. 23, Lots 2, 7; NEy4Nwy4. Ey2sEy4NEi4 , sy2swy4, Squirrel Corral Publiti Service Site Sec. 26, NW%; SE14; Sec. 27, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, SE&NE^, Sec. 36, Lots 2, 3, 9. T. 8 N., R. 45 E., Ny2NW%, SW%SWV4, E 14SE 14; T. 14 N., R. 44 E., Sec. 16, NE^NW ^. Sec. 28, NE^4, SE^NW ^, NE%SWi4, Lots Sec. 29, Lots 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, NW^SW^, Crooked Creek Public Service Site 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, N W ^ S E ^ ; sy2swy4; Sec. 29, Lots 5, 6, Sy&Sy&; Sec. 30, Lots 4, 5, 6, W ^NE^, SE^NE1^, T. 11 N., R. 32 E., Sec. 30, sy 2s y 2s i 4 ; Ey2NWi4, Ey2swy4, sev4; Sec. 20, NE 14, N E 14SE 14; Sec. 31, Ny2N%; Sec. 31, Lots 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11,12, NW ^NE’Ai Sec. 21, NW/4, NW14SW54. S ec. 32, L o ts 1, 2 , 3, 4, 5, W%, Wy2E ^ , NE^4 E i/2NEy4, SE»4SWy4, SW%SEy4; Divide Creek Public Service Site NE%; Sec. 32, Lots 2, 3, 9, 10, W»/2NWy4. Sec. 33, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, E%, SWy4, SE14 (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be NW&; Latham Springs Public Service Site when surveyed:) Sec. 34, All; T. 13 N., R. 45 E., T. 13 N., R. 31 E., Sec. -35, All. S ec. 9, sy2sy2; Sec. 10, S% swy4; S ec. 12, sy2swi/4; Burns Creek Public Service Site Sec. 13, NWy4; S ec. 15 , N y2N w y 4 ; Sec. 14, Ey2Nwy4. T. 3 N., R. 42 E., Sec. 16, N^Ny2. Sec. 11, Lot 1, SE 14NE 14; Howard Springs Public Service Site Paul Reservoir Public Service Site Sec. 12, Lot 1, SWi4NWy4. T. 16 N., R.*44 E., T. 13 N., R. 35 E., Moody Meadows Public Service Site Sec. 10, SW 14; Sec. 29, Lot 5, SW ^SEli; Sec. 15, NW 14, W»/4NEy4. , T. 4 N., R. 42 E., Sec. 32, Lot 1, NWy4NE»4, S^NEii. E'/j NW y4, N E 1/4SW 14, N%SE«/4; Sec. 11, Ei4SEy4SEy4; Pleasant Valley Public Service Site sec. 12, wy2Nwy4swy4, sw i4swy4. Sec. 33, Lots 1, 2, NWy4SWJi. T. 13 N., R. 36 E., Snow Creek Public Service Site Sec. 30, Lots 1, 2, E^NW ^. Crow Creek Public Service Site T. 10 N., R. 45 E., Stoddard Public Service Site T. 13 N R. 43 E S e c . 4, SE»/4; S ec. 8,’ Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 11, NE&NE^; s e c . 9, NW14NE14, NEi4Nwy4, sy2Nwy4. T. 13 N., R. 36 E., Sec. 9, All; Ny2swy4, swyiswy4. S ec, 27, sy 2 SW»4; Sec. 10, All; Sec. 28, SEy4SEi4; Sec. 11, All; Grand View Public Service Site Sec. 33, E^NEy4; S e c . 14, NEy4, E^N W i4, N w ^ N w y i; T. 10 N., R. 43 E., . Sec. 34, NW!4, Ny2NE»4, N ^S^N E ^; S ec. 15, Ny2 NEy4, SW^NE^, Nwy4, SW14 , Sec. 24, Ey2; s e c . 35, w y 2N w y 4 . W^SEi4; ‘ Sec. 25, Ey2NEi4. Saturday, July 30, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 5471

Beaver Creek Public Service Site FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION volved in and the issues presented by T 13 N., R. 36 E., such application: Provided, however. [Docket No. G-6934] Sec. 35, Wy2N W ‘/4. That the Commission may, after a non- T i m G. L o w r y contested hearing, dispose of the pro­ Coal Kiln Public Service Site ceedings pursuant to the provisions of T 12 N., R . 27 E., NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND DATE OF section 1.30 (c) (1) or Cc) (2) of the Sec. 36, SW&. HEARING Commission’s Rules of Practice and Steel Creek Public Service Site Procedure. J u l y 25, 1955. Protests or petitions to intervene may T. 13 N., R-. 38 E., Take notice that Tim G. Lowry, Ap­ Sec. 7, SE^NE^, Unsurveyed E^SE^; be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ plicant, an individual whose address is sion, Washington 25, D. C., in accordance Sec. 8, S%, S%N%; 135 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illi­ Sec. 9, Unsurveyed S^N W ^, N%SWy4* with the Rules of Practice and Procedure nois, filed on November 30, 1954, an Saw Creek Public Service Site (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before August application for a certificate of public 11, 1955. Failure of any party to appear T. 13 N., R. 38 E. convenience and necessity, pursuant to at and participate in the hearing shall section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, author­ (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be be construed as waiver of and concur­ when surveyed:) izing Applicant to render service as here­ rence in omission herein of the interme­ inafter described, subject to the juris­ Sec. 1, WI/2SE 14, w y 2Ei/2SE y4. diate decision procedure in cases where diction of the Commission, all as more a request therefor is made. Kay Creek Public Service Site fully represented in the application which is on file with the Commission [ s e a l ] L e o n M . F u q u a y , T. 14 N., R . 39 E. and open for public inspection. Secretary. (Unsurveyed, but what will probably be Applicant produces natural gas in [F. R. Doc. 55-6165; Filed, July 29, 1955; when surveyed:) South Blanco Pictured Cliff Gas Field, 8:47 a. m.] sec. 31, sy2Nwy4. Ny2swy4. Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, and sells it in interestate commerce to El Paso Willow Creek Public Service Site Natural Gas Company at 10 cents per T. 13 N., R. 40 E., Mcf, for resale. [Docket Nos. G-3188, etc.] Sec. 9, Lots 3, 6, 7, NW%SEi4. This matter is one that should be dis­ S l ic k -M oor m a n O il C o . e t a l . West Rattlesnake Public Service Site posed of as promptly as possible under the applicable rules and regulations, and NOTICE OF APPLICATIONS AND DATE OF T. 12 N., R . 37 E. to that end: HEARING (Unsurveyed, but when surveyed will Take further notice that, pursuant to J u l y 25,1955. probably b e:) the authority contained in and subject In the matters of Slick-Moorman Oil Sec. 10, Ey2. to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Company, et al., Docket No. G-3188; Elk Creek Public Service Site Federal Power Commission by sections Drilling and Exploration Company, Inc., 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and et al., Docket No. G-3208; Texas Pacific T. 1 S., R. 45 E., the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Coal and Oil Company, Docket No. G- Sec. 13, Sy2SE»4. Procedure, a hearing will be held on T. 1 S., R. 46 E., 5183; Tennessee Gas Transmission Com­ Sec. 18, Lots 3, 4, E%SWJ4-. SEJ4; August 24, 1955, at 9:30 a. m., e. d. s. t., pany, Docket No. G-6127. Sec. 19, Lots 1, 2, NE % N W %, N»/2NEy4. in a Hearing Room of the Federal Power Take notice that there have been filed Commission, 441 G Street NW., Wash­ with the Federal Power Commission ap­ J oe T. F allini, ington, D. C., concerning the matters in­ plications as hereinafter specified: Acting State Supervisor.

[P. R. Doc. 55-6082; Filed, July 29, 1955; Applicant Address . Date filed Docket 8:45 a. m.] No.

Sept. 27,1954 G-3188 Drilling & Exploration Co., Inc., et al... 800 Sañ Jacinto Bldg., Houston, Tex...... G-3208 CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Fort Worth National Bank Bldg., Fort Worth, Nov. 22,1954 G-5183 Tex. [Docket No. 7301] Dec. 15,1954 G-6127

O za r k A ir l in e s , I n c . each for a certificate of public conveni­ existing facilities which have been and NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT OF PREHEARING ence and necessity, pursuant to Section 7 are now being used to receive gas from CONFERENCE of the Natural Gas Act, authorizing the various fields and from a number of in­ In the matter of an investigation into sale of natural gas and the operation of dependent producers and suppliers, in­ whether the public convenience and ne­ facilities as hereinafter described, sub­ cluding those named herein. cessity require the certification of Ozark ject to the jurisdiction of the Commis­ These related matters should be heard Airlines, Inc. to provide air transporta­ sion, all as more fully represented in the on a consolidated record and disposed tion between Peoria, Illinois and Fort respective applications, which are on file of as promptly as possible under the ap­ Dodge, Iowa, via the intermediate points with the Commission and open for public plicable rules and regulations and to Galesburg, Illinois, Burlington, Ottumwa inspection. that end: and Des Moines, Iowa. Applicants set forth below produce and Take further notice that, pursuant to Notice is hereby given that the pre- sell natural gas to Tennessee Gas Trans­ the authority contained in and subject hearing conference in the above-entitled mission Company for transportation in to the jurisdiction conferred upon the investigation now assigned to be held on interstate commerce for resale, as Federal Power Commission by sections July 29 is hereby postponed to August 2, indicated: 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and the 1955. This conference will be held at Commission’s Rules of Practice and 10:00 a. m. (eastern daylight saving Applicant Docket Procedure, a hearing will be held on time) in Room E-206, Temporary Build­ No. August 30, 1955, at 9:30 a. m., e. d. s. t., ing No. 5, Sixteenth Street and Con­ in a Hearing Room of the Federal Power Slick-Moorman Oil Tomball Southeast G-3188 Commission, 441 G Street NW., Wash­ stitution Avenue NW., Washington, D. C., Cq., et al. Field, Harris Coun­ before Examiner Richard A. Walsh. ty, Tex. ington, D. C., concerning the matters Drilling & Explora­ West Ace Field, San G-3208 involved in and the issues presented by tion Co., et al. Jacinto County, Dated at Washington, D. C., July 27, Tex. such applications: Provided, however, moo« . ,. x"'’ "ty:'"i. Texas Pacific Coal & Glenmore Field, G-5183 That the Commission may, after a non- Gas Co. Rapides Parish, La. contested hearing, dispose of the pro­ [ seal] F r a n c is W . B r o w n , ceedings pursuant to the provisions of Chief Examiner. Tennessee Gas Transmission Com­ Section 1.30 (c) (1) or (c) (2) of the lp- R. Doc. 55-6181; Filed, July 29, 1955; pany, in its application in Docket No. Commission’s Rules of Practice and 8:51 a. m.l G-6127, requests authority to operate Procedure. 5472 NOTICES

Protests or petitions to intervene may [Docket No. G—9173] , Secretary concerning the lawfulness of be filed with the Federal Power Com­ said proposed changes in rates and mission, Washington 25, D. C., in accord­ T . L . J a m e s a n d C o ., I n c ., e t a l . charges; and, pending such hearing and ance with the Rules of Practice and ORDER SUSPENDING PROPOSED CHANGES IN decision thereon, the above-designated Procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or RATES supplements be and the same hereby are before August 15, 1955. Failure of any suspended and the use thereof deferred party to appear at and participate in T. L. James and Company, Inc., et al. until December 31, 1956, in the case of the hearing shall be construed as waiver (Applicant) on June 27, 1955, tendered Supplement No. 4 to .FPC Gas Rate of and concurrence in omission herein for filing proposed changes in its pres­ Schedule No. 11 and January 5, 1956, in of the intermediate decision procedure ently effective rate schedule for sales the case of Supplement No. 4 to FPC in cases where a request therefor is made. subject to the jurisdiction of the Com­ Gas Rate Schedule No. 7, and until such mission. The proposed changes, which further time as they are made effective [ s e a l } L e o n M . F u q u a y , constitute increased rates and charges, in the manner prescribed by the Natural Secretary. are contained in the following designated Gas Act. [F. R. Doc. 55-6164; Filed, July 29, 1955; filing which is proposed to become effec­ (B) Interested State commissions 8:47 a. m.] tive on the date shown: may participate as provided by sections 1.8 and 1.37 (f) (18 CFR 1.8 and 1.37 (f)) Description Purchaser Rate schedule designation Effective of the Commission’s rules of practice date1 and procedure.

Notice of change, dated June Louisiana Nevada Transit Supplement No. 1 to FPC gas rate July 28, 1955 Adopted: July 20, 1955. 1,1955. Co. schedule No. 3. Issued: July 26,1955. 1 The stated effective date is the first day after expiration of the required 30 days’ notice, or the effective date By the Commission. proposed by applicant if later. [ s e a l ] L e o n M . F u q u a y , The increased rates and charges pro­ (B) Interested State commissions may Secretary. posed in the aforesaid filing have not participate as provided by Sections 1.8 been shown to be justified, and may be and 1.37 (f) (18 CFR 1.8 and 1.37 (f)) [F. R. Doc. 55-6176; Filed, July 29, 1955; unjust, unreasonable, unduly discrimina­ of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 8:50 a. m.] tory, or preferential, or otherwise un­ and Procedure. lawful. Adopted: July 20, 1955. The Commission finds ; It is necessary- and proper in the public interest and to Issued: July 26, 1955. [Docket No. 0-6936] aid in the enforcement of the provisions By the Commission. of the Natural Gas Act that the Commis­ A . P l a c k C arr sion enter upon a hearing concerning [ s e a l ] L e o n M . F u q u a y , NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND DATE OF the lawfulness of the said proposed Secretary. HEARING changes, and that the above-designated [F. R. Doc. 55-6175; Filed, July 29, 1955; supplement be suspended and the use 8:49 a. m.] J u l y 25, 1955. thereof deferred as hereinafter ordered. Take notice that A. Plack Carr, an The Commission orders: individual whose address is 6800 Hunters (A) Pursuant to the authority .con­ Glen Road, Dallas 5, Texas, filed on tained in sections 4 and 15 of the Natural [Docket No. G-9174] November 30, 1954,-an application for a Gas Act and the Commission’s General certificate of public convenience and Rules and Regulations (18 CFR, Chapter M id s t a t e s O il C o r p . necessity pursuant to section 7 of the I ) , a public hearing be held upon a date ORDER SUSPENDING PROPOSED CHANGES IN Natural Gas Act, authorizing Applicant to be fixed by notice from the Secretary RATES to render service as hereinafter de­ concerning the lawfulness of said pro­ Midstates Oil Corporation (Applicant) scribed, subject to the jurisdiction of the posed changes in rates and charges; and, on June 30, 1955, and July 5, 1955, ten­ Commission, all as more fully repre­ pending such hearing and decision dered for filing proposed changes in sented in the application which is on file thereon, the above-designated supple­ presently effective rate schedules for with the Commission and open for public ment be and the same hereby is sus­ sales subject to the jurisdiction of the inspection. pended and the use thereof deferred Commission. The proposed changes, Applicant produces natural gas in the until December 28, 1955, and until such which constitute increased rates and Hugoton Field, Texas County, O klahom a, further time as it is made effective in charges, are contained in the following and sells it in interstate commerce to the manner prescribed by the Natùral designated filings which are proposed to Cities Service Gas Company for resale. Gas Act. become effective on the dates shown: The price is 10 cents per Mcf. This matter is one that should be dis­ posed of as promptly as possible under Description Purchaser Rate schedule designation Effective D a te1 the applicable rules and regulations and to that end: Take further notice that, pursuant to Notice of change, dated June v Mississippi River Fuel Corp. Supplement-No. 4 to FPC gas rate July 31, -1955 27, 1955. schedule No. 11. the authority contained in and subject to Notice of change, dated July ...... do____...... Supplement No 4 to FPC gas rate Aug. 5, 1955 the jurisdiction conferred upon the Fed­ 1, 1955. schedule No. 7. eral Power Commission by sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and the Com­ * The stated effective date is the first day after expiration of the required 30 days' notice, or the effective date proposed by applicant if later. mission’s Rules of Practice and Proce­ dure, a hearing will be held on A u g u st 24, The increased rates and charges pro­ ing the lawfulness of the said proposed 1955, at 9:45 a. m., e. s. t., in a Hearing posed in thé aforesaid filings have not changes, and that the above-designated Room of the Federal Power Commission, been shown to be justified, and may be supplements be suspended and the use 441 G Street NW., Washington, D. C., unjust, unreasonable, unduly discrimi­ thereof deferred as hereinafter ordered. concerning the matters involved in and natory, or preferential, or otherwise The Commission orders: the issues presented by such application: unlawful. (A) Pursuant to the authority con­ Provided, however, That the Commission The Commission finds: It is necessary tained in sections 4 and 15 of the Natu­ may, after a non-contested hearing, dis­ and proper in the public interest and to ral Gas Act and the .Commission’s Gen­ pose of the proceedings pursuant to the aid in the enforcement of the provisions eral Rules and Regulations (18 CFR, provisions of Section 1.30 (c) (1) or (0 Of the Natural Gas Act that the Com­ Chapter I), a public hearing be held (2) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice mission enter upon a hearing concem- upon a date to be fixed by notice of the and Procedure. Saturday, July 30, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 5473 Protests or petitions to intervene may end diversified investment company, has Notice is further given that any inter­ be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ filed an application pursuant to section ested person may, not later than August sion, Washington 25, D. C.t in accordance 6 (c) of the Investment Company Act 8,1955, at 5:30 p. m., submit to the Com­ with the Rules of Practice and Procedure of 1940 (“Act”) for an order of the mission in writing any facts bearing upon (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before August Commission exempting from the pro­ the desirability of a hearing on the 11,1955. Failure of any party to appear visions of section 22 (d) of the Act the matter and may request that a hearing at and participate in the hearing shall offering of shares of the Fund at net be held, such request stating the nature be construed as waiver of and concur­ asset value and without a sales load to of his interest, the reasons for such re­ rence in omission herein of the inter­ certain tax-exempt organizations. quest and the issues, if any, of fact or mediate decision procedure in cases The regular public offering price of the law proposed to be controverted, or he where a request therefor is made. shares of the Fund is equal to their net may request that he be notified if the Commission should order a hearing [ se a l ] L e o n M . F u q u a y , asset value plus a sales charge payable Secretary. to Dodge & Cox, principal underwriter thereon. Any such communication or of the shares of the Fund, equal to 2 per­ request should be addressed: Secretary, [P. R. Doc. 55-6166; Filed, July 29, 1955; cent of net asset value on sales up to Securities and Exchange. Commission, 8:47 a> m.] $25,000, 1 percent on sales from $25,000 Washington 25, D. C. At any time after to $75,000 and none thereafter. The said date, the application may be granted sales charge is computed on a cumu­ as provided in Rule N-5 of the Rules and lative basis as applied to the total of all Regulations promulgated under the Act. [Docket No. G-8518] purchases by any one person. By the Commission. O range G r o ve O il & G a s C o . an d In addition, the company desires to [ s e a l ] O rval L . D u B o i s , H. J. M o s s e r accept subscriptions at net asset value without a sales charge, from charitable, Secretary. NOTICE OP ORDER MAKING EFFECTIVE religious, educational and other organi­ [F. R. Doc. 55-6167; Filed, July 29, 1955; PROPOSED RATE CHANGES zations exempt from taxation under sec­ 8:48 a. m.] J u l y 26,1955. tion 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Notice is hereby given that on July 12, Code of 1954 as well as from pension, 1955, the Federal Power Commission is­ profit sharing and other employees’ bene­ INTERSTATE COMMERCE sued its order adopted July 8, 1955, mak­ fit plans exempt from taxation under sec­ COMMISSION ing effective proposed rate changes upon tion 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. filing of bond to assure refund of excess Section 22 (d) of the Act, with certain F o u r t h S e c t io n A pplications f o r charges in the above-entitled matter. exceptions not pertinent here, prohibits R e l ie f registered investment companies from [ sea l] L e o n M . F u q u a y , selling their redeemable securities to any J u l y 27, 1955. Secretary. person, other than a dealer or principal Protests to the granting of an appli­ [P. R. Doc. 55-6173; Filed, July 29, 1955; underwriter, at a price less than the cation must be prepared in accordance 8:49 a. m.] current public offering price described in with Rule 40 of the general rules of the prospectus. The offering of shares practice (49 CFR 1.40) and filed within of the Fund at net asset value, without a 15 days from the date of publication of sales charge, may involve an offering of this notice in the F ed e r a l R e g is t e r . [Docket Nos. ID-1003 etc.] its shares below the normal offering price, in contravention of the provisions of Sec­ LONG-AND-SHORT HAUL H a l s e y C . E d g e r t o n e t a l . tion 22 (d) of the Act. Accordingly, the FSA No. 30887: Motor-rail rates— NOTICE OF ORDERS AUTHORIZING APPLICANTS Fund has filed the instant application Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad et al. TO HOLD CERTAIN POSITIONS for an order of the Commission exempt­ Filed by Middlewest Motor Freight Bu­ ing the offering of its shares to the above- reau, Agent, for interested rail and mo­ J u l y 26, 1955. mentioned organizations without a sales In the matters of Halsey C. Edgerton, tor carriers. Rates on various commod­ load from said provisions of the Act. ities in loaded highway trailers on rail­ Docket No. ID-1003; Samuel M. Hamill, Section 6 (c) of the Act authorizes the Jr., Docket No. ID-1200; Eugene Gordon, road flat cars between St. Louis, Mo., Commission by order upon application and Oklahoma City, Okla. Docket No. ID-1266. conditionally or unconditionally to Grounds for relief: Competition with Notice is hereby given that on July 12, exempt any transaction from any pro­ 1955, the Federal Power Commission motor carriers. vision of the Act or of any rule or regu­ Tariff: Supplement 26 to Middlewest issued its order adopted July 8, 1955, lation thereunder, if and to the extent authorizing applicants to hold certain Motor Freight Bureau MF-I. C. C. 223. positions pursuant to section 305 (b) of that the Commission finds that such FSA No. 30888: Iron and steel arti­ the Federal Power Act in the above- exemption is necessary or appropriate in cles—Chicago, 111., group to Indiana. entitled matters. • the public interest and consistent with Filed by H. R. Hinsch, Agent, for inter­ the protection of investors and the pur­ ested rail carriers. Rates on iron and [ sea l] L e o n M . F u q u a y , poses fairly intended by the policy and steel articles, carloads, from Chicago, Secretary. 111., and points in the Chicago district in provisions of the Act. Illinois and Indiana grouped with and [P. R. Doc. 55-6174; Filed, July 29, 1955; It is applicant’s belief that such an 8:49 a. m.] taking the same rates as Chicago to exemption would be appropriate in the Michigan City, Ind., and eleven other public interest and consistent with the Indiana points named in exhibit “B” of SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE protection of investors and the purposes the application. intended by the policy and provisions of Ground for relief: Circuitous routes. COMMISSION the Investment Company Act. It is its Tariff: Supplement 204 to Agent [File No. 812-926] further belief that such an exemption Hinsch’s I. C. C. 3388. would be consistent with the Congres­ FSA No. 30889: Newsprint—Coosa D o dge & Cox F u n d sional policies evidenced by sections 501 Pines, Ala., to Florida. Filed by R. E. notice o f f il i n g f o r o r d er p e r m it t in g (c) (3) and 401 of the Internal Revenue Boyle, Jr., Agent, for interested rail car­ REDUCED PUBLIC OFFERING PRICES ON riers. Rates on newsprint paper, car­ Code. loads from Coosa Pines, Ala., to Miami, PURCHASES OF COMPANY SHARES BY TAX- For a more detailed statement of the EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS St. Petersburg, and Tampa, Fla. matters of fact and law asserted, all in­ Grounds for relief: Market competi­ J u l y 25, 1955. terested persons are referred to said tion and circuity. Notice is hereby given that Dodge & application which is on file in the office Tariff: Supplement 14 to Agent Span- Cox Fund (“Fund”), a registered open- of the Commission in Washington, D. C. inger’s I. C. C. 1466. 5474 NOTICES

FSA No. 30890: Steel and wrought B . Maximum cost and financing: iron pipe to Kansas, Oklahoma, and 1. Total over-all value of project______*_____ $20,200,000 Southwest Missouri. Filed by F. G. Kratzmeir, Agent, for interested rail car­ a. Items not Included in purchase contract: riers. Rates on steel and wrought iron (1) Architectural______$995 ,0 0 0 pipe, carloads from specified points in (2 ) L a n d ______- ______2 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0 ------$3, 495,000 official, Illinois, and western trunk-line b. Purchase contract costs: territories to specified points in Kansas, (1) Improvements ------$16,705,000 Oklahoma, and southwestern Missouri. 2. Contract Term ______10 to 25 years Grounds for relief: Barge and barge- 3. Maximum rate of interest on purchase contract_____ .______4% truck competition, market competition C. Estimated annual costs: and circuity. 1. 25 Year Contract Term: Tariff: Supplement 35 to Agent Kratz- a. Purchase contract payments: meir’s I. C. C. No. 4116 and five other (1) Amortization and interest______$ 1 ,0 6 9 ,3 2 0 tariffs. (2 ) T axes ______2 5 1 ,2 1 3 FSA No. 30891: Class rate exceptions, Rate per net sq. ft. $2.37. ------$1,320,533 from, to and between points east of the b. Costs not included in purchase contract payments: Rocky Mountains. Filed jointly by J. G. (1 ) C u sto d ia l a n d u t ilitie s ______$ 5 3 8 ,0 0 0 Kerr, H. C. Barron, E. V. Hill and R. G. (2) Repair and maintenance ______82, 000 Raasch, Agents, for carriers respondents Rate per net sq. ft. $1.11. — ------$620,000 in Docket 28300, and for other carriers, parties to Uniform Freight Classification c. Total Estimated Annual Cost______$1,940,533 No. 2, Agent Geo. H. Dumas’ I. C. C. No. Rate per net sq. ft. $3.48. > . — ----- . A-2. Rates on various commodities, on 2. Second 25 Year Term: which rates are based on exceptions to a. Custodial and utilities ______$538, 000 uniform freight classifications ratings, b. R ep airs a n d m a in te n a n c e ______.______160,000 from, to and between points in the c. Total Estimated Annual Cost______$698,000 United States east of the Rocky Moun­ Rate per net sq. ft. $1.25. ' -— , tains. 3. 50 Year Average: Grounds for relief: Maintenance of a . T o ta l E stim a te d A n n u a l C o st______$1,319,267 higher and different levels of class rates Rate per net sq. ft. $2.36. ■ ------on class exceptions rates, at intermedi­ 4. A n n u a l R e n ta l C osts for C om parable S p ace (N e t A g e n c y )______$1,970,000 ate points in one or more subdivisions of Rate per net sq. ft. $3.94. ------the territory included in Docket 28300; 5. Maximum Annual Payment Permitted ______Í______$3,030,000 By the Commission. (15% of fair market value.) , * — ^ N o te: All estimates based on 1955 price levels. [ s e a l ! H arold D. M c C o y , Secretary. D . Present annual rental and other hous­ complish this purpose. Among these was [P. R. Doc. 55-6177; Piled, July 29, 1955; in g costs: S 1290, passed in the Senate on June 8,1955, 8:50 a. m.] and enacted as Public Law .150, 84th Con­ gress, approved July 12, 1955. That law Net sq. Unit Total ft. cost cost ex p ressly m a n ife sts th e in t e n t o f Congress that (1) provision of accommodations for GENERAL SERVICES ADMIN­ executive agencies by GSA as a part of the L Existing Tempo’s 4,5 and T ISTRATION (or comparable space), to program for redevelopment of the southwest be supplanted by pro­ portion of the District of Columbia be accom­ [Project No. 3-DC-01] posed building ...... 500,522 $0.99 $495,760 plished on a lease-purchase basis and (2) F e d e r a l O f f i c e B u i l d i n g temporary space of equivalent occupancy be E. Justification of project: demolished. PROSPECTUS FOR PROPOSED BUILDING IN 1. Lack of Suitable Space: The proposed building will provide approx­ SOUTHWESTERN PORTION OF THE DIS­ a. The needs for space for the permanent im a te ly 500,000 sq u a re fe e t o f n e t office space, TRICT OF COLUMBIA activities of the Federal Government cannot to accommodate equivalent personnel dis­ be satisfied by utilization of existing Gov­ possessed from temporary buildings contem­ Editorial Note: This prospectus of pro­ ernment-owned space. plated for initial demolition under current posed Project Number 3-DC-01 is published b. Suitable rental space of comparable sort long-range planning programs. pursuant to section 412 (f) of the Public and characteristics is not available at a price 3. Direct and Indirect Benefits Expected to Buildings Purchase Contract Act of 1954, as commensurate with that to be afforded A ccrue. amended by Public Law 150, 84th Congress, through the contract proposed. a. Agencies whose related operations are which requires publication in the F ederal c. The space requested and proposed is scattered among two or more locations will R egister for a period of ten consecutive days needed for permanent activities of the Fed­ be able to concentrate all of them in a single from date of submission to the Committees eral Government. location and thereby realize appreciable econ­ on Public Works of the Senate and House d. The best interest of the Government omies deriving from such factors as con­ of Representatives. will be served by taking the action proposed. tiguity of operating elements, immediate accessibility of employees and records, and Project Number 3-DC-01 2. Existing Conditions: During the past several years there has elim ination of transportation and communi­ P rospectus for Proposed B uilding U nder been an active and widespread movement cation delays. T itle I, P ublic Law 519, 83d Congress, 2d on the part of the public and Governmental b. The accommodation of Federal agencies S ession agencies, notably the Commission of Fine in a single building will provide flexibility in Arts, concerning the removal of World War m a k in g in te r n a l r ea ssig n m e n ts o f agency federal OFFICE BUILDING, WASHINGTON, D. C. I and n Tempos and the restoration of the space where increases or decreases in re­ A. Brief description of proposed building: park lands. quirements occur. The project contemplates the erection of Data compiled as of December 31, 1954, c. The proposed building will be function­ a Federal Office Building on a site to be indicates that the Federal Government is al in concept and devoid of excessive em­ acquired in the Southwest redevelopment currently utilizing four (4) World War I bellishment and extravagant appointments. area. Tempo’s, providing 2,083,903 square feet of The design of the building and facilities will The proposed building will be a six-story net agency space, with 16,506 personnel; and provide for the utmost economy in con­ and penthouse structure, stone exterior, with 35 World War n Tempo’s, providing 3,585,063 struction; maintenance and operation costs cafeteria included, and air conditioned square feet, with 22,823 personnel. In sum­ considered. It will be provided with modern throughout. It will have a gross floor area mary, 39 Tempo’s, providing a total of 5,668,- fittings, appointments and conveniences of 815,000 square feet, that will provide 966 square feet of net agency space, with comparable to those provided in buildings of 558.000 square feet of net space, of which aggregate personnel of 39,329. The afore­ private enterprise. Maintenance and im­ mentioned figures do not include space or 500.000 square feet will be office area, 10,000 provement of employee morale and the con­ personnel of the Central Intelligence Agency. sequent increasing of employee efficiency square feet for shops, 34,000 square feet for The Congress, long sympathetic to the in­ over a period of years may thus be confi­ cafeteria, and 14,000 square feet for cus­ sistent demand for the razing of the Tempo’s dently expected to result in intangible todial, health unit, etc. has considered several proposed bills to ac­ though nonetheless real economies. Saturday, July 30, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 5475

F. Analysis of project space: 4. That every effort will be made to design 1. Since this project is intended to provide for relocation of numerous Federal activ­ and construct space conducive to maximum ities now housed in temporary buildings, no specific allocation of space among efficient utilization and to take advantage agencies can be made. Therefore requirement for Certificate of Need otherwise of any revision of cost downward which may required by Section 411 (e) of the Public Buildings Purchase Contract Act of be found possible as the plans develop and 1954 was waived in Public Law 150, 84th Congress. negotiations are advanced. Tou appreciate, of course, that this proj­ 2. S p a ce: ect will receive a more detailed review as to a. Distribution: cost and space utilization prior to approval of the lease-purchase agreement. Tempo’s 4,5, and T proposed Sincerely yours, “ \ Agency [S ig n e d ] R owland Hughes, Net sq. ft. Personnel Net sq. ft. Personnel D irector. Ho n. Edmund F. Mansure, Administrator, The specific allocation of agencies to be quartered in the proposed General Services Administration, building has not been presently determined. 500,520 3,072 500,000 3,700 Washington 25, D. C. General Services: 22,000 132 [F. R. Doc. 55-6130; Filed, July 26, 1955; 2,000 3 10:09 a. m .]' Cafeteria------34,000 50 500,520 '3,072 558,000 3,885

b. Utilization: Agency Space—sq. ft. per person ------163 135 RULES AND Total Space—sq. ft. per person.------.------163 144 c. Efficiency: Ratio, net to gross (net assignable)------68.5% REGULATIONS G. Analysis of project cost: 1. Costs of Improvements—Normal: a. Construction ______------$12 ,2 5 0 , 000 b . E levator ------430, 000 TITLE 24— HOUSING AND c. A ir C o n d itio n in g ______-- 1 ,7 5 0 ,0 0 0 HOUSING CREDIT d. Interest, taxes, etc., during construction ------730, 000 Cost per gross sq. ft. $18.60. ------$15,160, 000 Chapter II — Federal Housing Ad­ 2. Costs of Improvements—Additional: ministration, Housing and Home a. Approaches & utilities ------J.______$150, 000 Finance Agency b. S tea m c o n n e c tio n ______120, 000 c. Stone face ______5 2 5 ,0 0 0 Subchapter C— Mutual Mortgage Insurance and d. Contingencies ______7 5 0 ,0 0 0 Servicemen's Mortgage Insurance $1, 545,000 P art 221—M u t u a l M ortgage I n s u r a n c e ; E l i g ib il i t y R equirements o f M o r t ­ 3. Total Cost of Improvement------— ------$16, 705, 000 4. Costs Not Included in Purchase Contract: gage C o v e r in g O n e - t o F o u r -F a m il y a . A r c h ite c t u r a l______$ 9 9 5 ,0 0 0 D w e l l i n g s b. Land to be acquired (Est. Cost)______,— ------2 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0 Section 221.17 (a) (4) is amended by ------$3,495, 000 adding at the end thereof, before the semicolon, a proviso as follows: 5. Total over-all value of project------$20,200,000 § 221.17 Maximum amount of mort­ gage and mortgagor’s minimum invest­ H. Other selected data: Statement of Director, Bureau of the Budget ment. (a) * * * I. The proposed contract provisions will Executive Office of the P resident not exceed the amount necessary to; (4) * * * Provided, That with re­ a. Amortize principal. B ureau of the Budget spect to a mortgage insured pursuant to b. Provide interest not to 4% of the out­ WASHINGTON, D. C. an application received by the Commis­ standing principal. sioner on or after July 30, 1955, and c. Reimburse contractor for the cost of Project 3-DC-01 thereafter so long as this proviso shall taxes and interest during construction. Federal Office Building, remain in effect, the mortgage shall not d. Reimburse contractor for proportional Southwest Redevelopment Area, Washington, D. C. exceed 88 percent (93 percent if the charge for redevelopment general area, J uly 22, 1955. streets and utilities. dwelling is approved for insurance prior My Dear Mr. Mansure: to the beginning of construction) of 2. It is proposed to make awards on financ­ Pursuant to section 411 (e) (8) of the ing and construction by competition. $9,000 of the appraised value of the prop­ Public Buildings Purchase Contract Act of erty (as of the date the mortgage is ac­ 3. Estimated completion date for the proj­ 1954 (Public Law 519), the proposal for a ect is 40 months from date of final approval. Federal Office Building, transmitted with cepted for insurance) and 73 percent of 4. Taxes computed on basis of 75% ratio your letter of June 28, 1955, has been ex­ such value in excess of $9,000. and $22.00 per $1,000. amined and in my opinion “is necessary and Section 221.18 is amended by adding 5. Insurance included during construction in conformity with the policy of the Presi­ only as part of total cost borne by construc­ dent.” This approval is given with the fol­ to the first sentence thereof a proviso as tion contractor. During post-construction lowing understandings: follows: period Government will act as self-insurer. 1. That the project cost of $20,200,000 § 221.18 Payments and maturity dates. (including $2,500,000 for land to be ac­ Project Number 3-DC-01 * * * Provided, That with respect to a quired) is a maximum figure. mortgage insured pursuant to an appli­ Submission \ 2. That the reported annual operating cost of existing Tempos 4, 5 and T, i. e., 9 9 per cation received by the Commissioner on Submitted at Washington, D. C. sq. ft., represents minimum maintenance in or after July 30, 1955, and thereafter so anticipation of demolition, and that tem­ long as this proviso shall remain in effect, Recommended: porary Government buildings actually cost the maturity shall not exceed 25 years more to maintain than the proposed new [S] P eter A. S trobel, from the date of insurance of the mort­ Commissioner of Public Buildings Service, b u ild in g . gage. General Services Administration. 3. That the proposed building will house some 10 percent of Federal employes pres­ In § 221.42 (b) the introductory text is Approved: ently housed in temporary buildings, and amended to read as follows: [3 ] A. E. Snyder, that the specific allocation of agencies in Acting Administrator, the proposed building is to be determined § 221.42 Eligibility of miscellaneous General Services Administration. later by GSA. type mortgages. * * * 5476 RULES AND REGULATIONS

(b) A mortgage may be in an amount applications received by the Commis­ TITLE 38— PENSIONS, BONUSES, not exceeding 90 percent (88 percent in sioner on or after July 30, 1955) of the the case of a mortgage insured pursuant appraised value, as of the date the mort­ AND VETERANS' RELIEF to an application received by the Com­ gage is accepted for insurance, if the Chapter I—Veterans Administration missioner on or after July 30, 1955) of mortgagor is not the owner and occu­ the appraised value of the mortgaged pant, provided (1) the property is to P a r t 36—S e r v ic e m e n ’s R eadjustment property as of the date the mortgage is be built or acquired or rehabilitated for A c t o f 1944 accepted for insurance if. sale, and (2) the insured mortgage fi­ s u b p a r t a—Tit l e i n ; l o a n guaranty nancing is required to facilitate the Section 221.42 is amended by adding 1. A new § 36.4356 is added as follows: at the end thereof a new paragraph as construction or the repair or rehabili­ follows: tation of the dwelling and provide § 36.4356 Maturity and down pay­ financing pending the subsequent sale ment limitations. Pending possible § 221.42 Eligibility of miscellaneous thereof to a qualified owner occupant. changes in economic conditions and type mortgages. * * * until further legal changes' (regulatory (i) Notwithstanding the provisions of P art 225—S e r v ic e m e n ’s M ortgage I n ­ or statutory), no loan for the purchase paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section s u r a n c e ; E l i g i b i l i t y R equirements o f or construction of residential property and so long as this paragraph shall re­ M ortgage proposed to be guaranteed under section main in effect, a mortgage of the char­ 501 of the Act on which the request for acter described in paragraph (c) insured Section 225.4 is amended to read as follows: appraisal is received on or after July 30, pursuant to an application received by 1955, shall be eligible for guaranty unless the Commissioner on or after July 30, § 225.4 Maximum mortgage amount; the veteran makes a cash payment of 1955, shall not exceed 93 percent of the ratio of loan-to-value limitation. The not less than two percent of the purchase appraised value of the property as of the mortgage shall be in an amount not to price of the property and unless the date the mortgage is accepted for insur­ exceed 95 percent (93 percent with re­ maturity is not in excess of 25 years and ance; or with respect to.a mortgage of spect to a mortgage insured pursuant 32 days, except that this requirement the character described in paragraph to an application received by the Com­ shall not apply to loans made solely for (d) shall not exceed 83 percent of the ap­ missioner on or after July 30, 1955) of the replacement or reconstruction of praised value of the property as of the the appraised value of the property as residential property which has been date the mortgage is accepted for of the date the mortgage is accepted destroyed or substantially damaged by insurance. for insurance. flood, fire or other similar casualty. 2. In § 36.4503 a new paragraph (e) is Subchapter F— Rehabilitation and Neighborhood Subchapter N— National Defense Housing added as follows: Conservation Housing Insurance Insurance § 36.4503 Amount and amortization. P art 294—E l i g ib il i t y R equirements f o r P art 261—H o m e R ehabilitation I n s u r ­ * * * N a t io n a l D e f e n s e H o u s in g I n s u r a n c e a n c e : E l i g ib il i t y R equirements o f (e) With respect to any direct loan M ortgage C o v e r in g O n e - t o E l e v e n - In § 294.10 the first sentence is for the purchase or construction of a F a m il y D w e l l i n g s amended to read as follows: farm residence or other dwelling on which the application for such loan is Section 261.7 (a) is amended by add­ § 294.10 Maximum amount of mort­ received on or after July 30, 1955, the ing thereto a new subparagraph as gage. The mortgage must involve a follows: veteran shall be required to make a cash principal obligation in an amount not in payment of 2 percent of the purchase § 261.7 Maximum mortgage amount; excess of 90 percent (88 percent in the price of the property. case of a mortgage insured pursuant to loan-to-value limitation, (a) * * * 3. Section 36.4505 is revised to read as (3) 93 percent of the appraised valuean application received by the Commis­ follows: of the property as of the date the mort­ sioner on or after July 30, 1955) of the gage is accepted for insurance with re­ appraised value as of the date the mort­ § 36.4505 Maturity of loan. The ma­ spect to a mortgage of the character gage is accepted for insurance of a prop­ turity of a loan shall not exceed 20 years, described in subparagraph (1); or with erty, urban, suburban or rural, upon except that if Veterans Administration respect to a mortgage of the character determines that the income and expenses which there is located a dwelling de­ of a veteran-applicant at the time of his described in subparagraph (2) not in ex­ signed principally for residential use for cess of 73 percent of the appraised value application for a loan, or at the time of not more than two families in the aggre­ closing of the loan, are such that under in excess of $9,000 as of the date the gate, which is approved for mortgage customary credit standards he would be mortgage is accepted for insurance if insurance prior to the beginning of con­ unable to maintain the required schedule the mortgage is insured pursuant to an struction, the construction of which is of amortized payments for a loan which application received by the Commis­ begun after September 1,1951. matures in 20 years, but that taking into sioner on or after July 30,1955. consideration the veteran’s current and Section 294.11 is amended by adding prospective income and expenses he to the first sentence thereof a proviso as would be able to make the payments on P ar t 266—H o m e R e l o c a t io n I n s u r a n c e ; follows: ^ the loan if amortized over a longer pe­ E l i g i b i l i t y R equirements o f M o r t ­ riod of time, the loan may be made with gage C o v e r in g S in g l e F a m i l y D w e l ­ § 294.11 Maturity. * * * Provided: That with respect to mortgages insured a maturity for such longer period of time l i n g s but not in excess of 25 years and 32 days: In § 266.6 subparagraphs (a) and (b) pursuant to applications received by the Provided, That in no event will the ma­ are amended to read as follows: Commissioner on or after July 30, 1955, turity exceed the estimated economic life and thereafter so long as this proviso of the property securing the loan. Noth­ § 266.6 Maximum mortgage amount; shall remain in effect, the maturity shall ing in this section shall preclude exten­ loan-to-value limitation. * * * not exceed 25 years from the date of sion of the loan pursuant to the provi­ (a) 95 percent (93 percent with re­ insurance of the mortgage. sions of § 36.4506. spect to mortgages insured pursuant to (Sec. 211, 52 Stat. 23; 12 U. S. C. 1715b; (Sec. 504, 58 Stat. 293, as amended; 38 U. S. C. applications received by the Commis­ sec. 907, 65 Stat. 301; 12 U. S. C. 1750f). 694d) sioner on or after July 30, 1955) of the appraised value, as of the date the mort­ Issued at Washington, D. C., July 30, ' This regulation is effective July 30, gage is accepted for insurance, where 1955. 1955. the mortgagor is the occupant of the N o r m a n P . M a s o n , [ s e a l ] H. V. H ig l e y , property, or Federal Housing Commissioner. Administrator of Veterans Affairs. (b) 85 percent (83 percent with re­ [F. R. Doc. 55-6259; Filed, July 29, 1955; [F. R. Doc. 55-6252; Filed, July 29, 1955! spect to mortgages insured pursuant to 5:00 p. m.l 5:00 p. m.l