DOCSLIB.ORG

Bio Stu Wat Ologic Udy of Tersh Cal an F the Hed Nd Wa Capt Ater Q Tina C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ril 2010 p A Biological and Water Quality Study of the Captina Creek Watershed Ted Strickland, Governor Lee Fisher, Lt. Governor Chris Korleski, Director DSW/EAS 2010-4-1 Captina Creek Watershed 2009 April 15, 2010 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Captina Creek Watershed 2009 Belmont County, Ohio April 15, 2010 OEPA Report DSW/EAS 2010-4-1 prepared by State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 Southeast District Office 2195 Front Street Logan, Ohio 43138 Ecological Assessment Section 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, Ohio 43125 Ted Strickland, Governor Chris Korleski, Director State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 1 DSW/EAS 2010-4-1 Captina Creek Watershed 2009 April 15, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 10 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 13 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 Water Chemistry ................................................................................................................................... 14 Recreation Use ..................................................................................................................................... 20 Effluent Dischargers ............................................................................................................................. 22 Sediment .............................................................................................................................................. 32 Stream Physical Habitat ....................................................................................................................... 33 Fish Community ................................................................................................................................... 35 Macroinvertebrate Community ............................................................................................................. 37 WATERSHED ASSESSMENT UNITS ........................................................................................................... 39 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 40 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................ 41 APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................................ A1 2 DSW/EAS 2010-4-1 Captina Creek Watershed 2009 April 15, 2010 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page Figure 1 Captina Creek sampling locations and biological community performance. 7 Figure 2 Captina Creek watershed study area. 13 Figure 3 Flow conditions in Captina Creek during 2009. 14 Figure 4 Dissolved oxygen measurements in Captina Creek and tributaries, 2009 14 Figure 5 Conductivity measurements in Captina Creek and tributaries, 2009 14 Figure 6 Total dissolved solids measurements in Captina Creek, 2009 15 Figure 7 Discharge from Pond 13 (outfall 013). 24 Figure 8 Captina Creek water samples collected after the Ohio Valley Coal slurry release 25 on Feb. 28, 2008. 3 DSW/EAS 2010-4-1 Captina Creek Watershed 2009 April 15, 2010 LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page Table 1 Captina Creek watershed sampling locations from the Ohio EPA 2008-2009 survey. 6 Table 2 Aquatic life use attainment for sampling locations in the Captina Creek watershed. 8 Table 3 Waterbody use designation recommendations for Captina Creek and tributaries. 12 Table 4 Exceedances of Ohio Water Quality Standards criteria (OAC3745-1) for chemical/physical 16 parameters measured in the Captina Creek watershed. Table 5 Summary statistics for select mining water quality parameters sampled in the Captina 18 Creek study area, 2009. Table 6 Summary statistics for select nutrient water quality parameters sampled in the Captina 19 Creek study area, 2009. Table 7 A summary of E. coli data sampled in the Captina Creek study area, 2009 21 Table 8 Organic parameters detected in slurry sludge deposits collected from Perkins Run on 27 March 5, 2008 downstream from the location of the Ohio Valley Coal slurry release. Table 9 Metal parameters detected in slurry sludge deposits collected from Perkins Run on 27 March 5, 2008 downstream from the location of the Ohio Valley Coal slurry release. Table 10 Concentrations of monitored chemicals in effluent discharged from 5 facilities within the 28 Captina Creek study area. Table 11 Chemical parameters measured above screening levels in sediment samples collected 32 in the Captina Creek study area, 2009. Table 12 Stream habitat (QHEI) results for the Captina Creek study area, 2009. 34 Table 13 Comparison of average IBI and MIwb scores for Captina Creek with other high quality 35 EWH wading streams in Ohio. Table 14 Average IBI and MIwb scores for Captina Creek from 1983 and 2009. 35 Table 15 Fish community summaries based on pulsed D.C. electrofishing sampling conducted 36 by the Ohio EPA in the Captina Creek study area, 2008 and 2009. Table 16 Comparison of averages of ICI scores, total macroinvertebrate taxa, and pollution sensitive 37 taxa for Captina Creek with other high quality EWH wading streams in Ohio. Table 17 Summary of macroinvertebrate data collected from the Captina Creek study, 2008 and 2009. 38 Table 18 Results for the Captina Creek watershed using the HUC12 methodology. 39 4 DSW/EAS 2010-4-1 Captina Creek Watershed 2009 April 15, 2010 SUMMARY Rivers and streams in Ohio support a variety of uses such as recreation, water supply, and aquatic life. Ohio Clean Water Act EPA evaluates each stream to determine the appropriate Aquatic Life Goal use designation and to also determine if the use is meeting the goals of the federal Clean Water Act. Full Twelve streams in the Captina Creek watershed, located 6% in southern Belmont and northern Monroe counties, were Partial evaluated for aquatic life and recreation use potential in 2008 and 2009 (see Figure 1 and Table 1 for sampling locations). Of the 32 biological samples collected, 30 sites (94%) 94% were fully meeting the designated or recommended aquatic life use and two (6%) were in partial attainment. The South Fork of Captina Creek was in partial attainment due to sparse habitat predominated by bedrock but the macroinvertebrates were excellent at this location. State endangered Eastern Hellbender salamanders were also caught in the lower and mid section of the South Fork Captina Creek. Cat Run was in partial attainment due to fair fish scores but the macroinvertebrate community was very good. A natural waterfall is located below this location on Cat Run and may be creating a fish passage barrier that resulted in low IBI scores. Seven locations in the Captina Creek watershed were tested for bacteria indicators (Escherichia coli) to determine recreation use attainment status. Evaluation of E. coli results revealed that all seven locations attained the applicable geometric mean criterion, and thus were in full attainment of the designated recreation use. Six streams within the study area exhibited qualities indicative of the Coldwater Habitat (CWH) aquatic life use. Macroinvertebrate and fish communities from all six streams (Joy Fork, Jakes Run, Peavine Creek, Crabapple Creek, Piney Creek, and Casey Run) were fully meeting expectations of the CWH use. Water quality throughout the watershed has been consistently good despite historic and active coal mining. The limestone geology of the area has buffered acidic contributions and has kept the pH levels in the range acceptable for supporting aquatic life. Ohio Valley Coal Company (OVCC) and American Energy Corporation (AEC), both owned by Murray Energy, have permitted NPDES discharges located in Perkins Run and Piney Creek which discharge to the upper section of Captina Creek. Elevated levels of total dissolved solids (TDS), metals and conductivity were found during the 2008 and 2009 survey in Captina Creek, Perkins Run and Piney Creek below the two mine discharges. In some cases, levels of TDS and metals exceeded the applicable water quality standards and also exceeded current NPDES permit limits for OVCC and AEC. Coal slurry waste has been released from both the OVCC slurry impoundment as well as from an AEC pipeline which crosses Captina Creek. The slurry is typically a thick, viscous, black material that can potentially smother aquatic life and contains numerous organic and metal contaminants. Contaminated sediments were found in Perkins Run and in Captina Creek downstream from where the slurry spills have occurred. These sediments have not caused biological impairment at the time of sampling but long term chronic exposure could result in future impacts to aquatic life. Elevated nutrients were found in the North Fork Captina Creek downstream from the Barnesville WWTP. The fish and macroinvertebrate communities were meeting WWH but could potentially meet EWH
Recommended publications
  • Geology and Coal Resources of Belmont County, Ohio

    Geology and Coal Resources of Belmont County, Ohio

    Geology and Coal Resources of Belmont County, Ohio By HENRY L. BERRYHILL, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 380 Prepared in cooperation with the Ohio Division of Geological Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEW ART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Stratigraphy Continued Abstract. __________________________________________ 1 Pennsylvanian rocks Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Conemaugh formation Continued Purpose of the study- ___________________________ 1 Description of members Continued Preparation of the report ________________________ 2 Eastern Belmont County Continued Page Acknowledgments _______________________________ 2 Connellsville sandstone member __ 14 Previous workers _______________________________ 2 Lower Pittsburgh limestone mem­ Geography- ________________________________________ 3 ber __________________________ 14 Topography and drainage.-. _________________________ 3 Bellaire sandstone member. ___ 15 Structure, _ _____________________________________ 5 Upper Pittsburgh limestone mem­ Stratigraphy _ ______________________________________ 5 ber. _______________ __________ 15 General features. _______________________________ 5 Clay overlying the Upper Pitts­ Pennsylvanian rocks ___________________________ 6 Conemaugh formation. _ _____________________ 6 burgh limestone
  • Dams in the Passumpsic River Watershed

    Dams in the Passumpsic River Watershed

    Table of Contents General Description of the Passumpsic River Watershed .................................................. 1 Uses, Values, Special Features of the Passumpsic Watershed ......................................... 2 Waterfalls, Cascades, Gorges, and Swimming Holes ..................................................... 2 Significant Natural Communities...................................................................................... 2 Public Lands and Private Conservation Land in the Basin .............................................. 2 Water Quality/Aquatic Habitat Assessment Basinwide ....................................................... 3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 Overall Assessment of Lake, Pond, River, Stream Uses ................................................ 4 Assessment of Cause and Sources affecting River, Stream, Lake, Pond Uses .............. 5 Passumpsic River up to the Branches and some tributaries ............................................... 7 Description ....................................................................................................................... 7 Sampling Results and Assessment Information .............................................................. 8 River and Stream Assessment Summary ...................................................................... 12 Lakes and Ponds ..........................................................................................................
  • Keystone Tap Magazine

    Keystone Tap Magazine

    A Publication of the Pennsylvania Rural Water Association fhe ~ystOne 1r~~ !summer 1994 Vol. VII, No. ~ Pennsylvania Rural Water ' Association Serving Water/Wastewater I..... Systems in Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Rural Water Association 138 West Bishop Bellefonte, Pennsylvania 16823 (814) 353-9302 FAX: (814) 353-9341 Here is what people are saying about PRWA: PENNSYLVANIA Wonderview Water Co. RURAL WATER 91 Dutch Hill Rd. ASSOCIATION Bloomsburg, PA 17815 717-387-8762 6-6-94 -mlnite'b ~ ta tes ~ena t e Pennsylvania Rural Water Association WASHINGTON, DC 20510-3803 138 West Bishop Street Bellefonte, PA 16823 May 4, 1994 (814) 353-9302 FAX (814) 353-9341 Mr. Stephen M. Krchnavy Pennsylvania Rural Water Association Dear Rural Water, 138 West Bishop Street Thank you for sending out your leak detection expert Chris Shutt. Bellefonte, PA 16823 He was very helpful in finding two water leaks in our system. Enclosed, please find our application for membership from and a Dear Mr. Krchnavy. check for this year's dues. Thank you to you and the rest of the Pennsylvania Rural Water Thank you, Association members for stopping by our office to share your views. I have passed on your material and video tape on to Sena10r Wofford. You can be certain that he will keep your views in mind as the Safe Drinking Water Act #~ is considered in the Senate. John Yohey Please do not hesitate to contact our office again if we can be of further assistance. Sincerely, J""- ~~ L~ KAfiM,id.l Sara Marcus Kaplaniak BAINBRIDGE WATER AUTHORITY POST OFFICE BOX 338 • BAINBRIDGE, PA 17502 March 10, 1994 Pennsylvania Aural Water Association 138 West Bishop Street Bellefonte, PA 16823 U.S.
  • REQUEST for PROPOSALS for PURCHASE: FORMER STAR CITY CINEMAS PARCEL Proposals Must Be Received No Later Than WEDNESDAY, JUNE 12, 2019 @ 10:00 A.M

    REQUEST for PROPOSALS for PURCHASE: FORMER STAR CITY CINEMAS PARCEL Proposals Must Be Received No Later Than WEDNESDAY, JUNE 12, 2019 @ 10:00 A.M

    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PURCHASE: FORMER STAR CITY CINEMAS PARCEL Proposals must be received no later than WEDNESDAY, JUNE 12, 2019 @ 10:00 A.M. April 16, 2019 South Fayette Township REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PURCHASE OF THE FORMER STAR CITY PARCEL LOCATED IN THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FAYETTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Application The undersigned Applicant, having carefully read this RFP and had the opportunity to obtain all clarifications it believes it needs, proposes to purchase the property as described in detail in the Request for Proposals (RFP) set forth below. Applicant understands that anything in its proposal which is found to be incomplete or inaccurate will be a valid basis for the Township discontinuing further consideration of the proposal and notifying Applicant accordingly. Any information provided in or attached to this proposal which the Applicant considers to be confidential shall be clearly marked as such by Applicant, and justification for the claim of confidentiality shall be provided. Applicant understands that information will be subject to disclosure to other Applicants and the public as and when required by law. Applicant’s name, U.S. headquarters address, and local address: Applicant has completed and attached to this proposal a true, correct and complete Disclosure on the form provided by the Township. The undersigned representative of the Applicant affirms that the contents of the Disclosure form are true, correct and complete. The undersigned officer of Applicant, being duly authorized to do so, submits this proposal on behalf of Applicant, affirming that it is complete and correct in all respects. By submitting this proposal, Applicant agrees that, if selected, it will perform all items described in the RFP.
  • The Passumpsic Watershed Water Quality Assessment Report 2018

    The Passumpsic Watershed Water Quality Assessment Report 2018

    The Passumpsic Watershed Water Quality Assessment Report 2018 Table of Contents Land Cover of the Passumpsic Watershed 3 Water Quality Protection Priorities 4 Water Quality Remediation Priorities 5 Millers Run (Wheelock, Sheffield, Lyndon) 6 Dishmill Brook & Dishmill Brook #2 (Burke) 7 Unnamed Tributary to Passumpsic River, EPA Superfund (Lyndon) 8 Moose River (St. Johnsbury, Waterford) 9 Passumpsic River & Lower Sleepers River (St. Johnsbury) 10 The Water Andric (Danville, Barnett) 11 Simpsons Brook (Waterford), Sleepers River (Danville, St. Johnsbury) 12 Monitoring Priorities 13 3 Land Cover of the Passumpsic Watershed Forested Developed East Agriculture Wetlands Sub Watershed Boundary West Moose Millers Run Sleepers Upper Lower Joes 0 2.5 5 10 Miles Table 1. NLCD 2011 Land Cover for the Passumpsic River Watershed. Sub Watershed Forested Developed Agriculture Wetlands Sub Watershed Forested Developed Agriculture Wetlands Millers Run 76.3 6.9 9.8 2.0 Upper Tributaries 67.4 11.2 14.3 1.8 Sleepers River 73.6 6.2 14.7 1.8 West Branch 71.2 6.3 12.9 6.3 Joes Brook 75.1 4.6 8.7 5.0 East Branch 84.4 3.5 4.7 3.4 Lower Tributaries 69.9 11 13.4 1.3 Moose River 82.1 3.1 3.3 5.8 4 Water Quality Protection Priorities Potential B(1) Current A(1) Fishing Potential A(1) Aquatic Biota Potential B(1) 1 2 Aquatic Biota 3 Reclass From A(2) 5 4 Remain 6 11 13 A(2) 7 12 8 9 Potential 10 A1 Wetland 28 Sentinel Sites 15 16 17 18 19 14 Victory Bog 29 20 21 22 ID Waterbody Name Potential 11 Nation brook trib B1 Fishing 12 Square brook trib B1 Fishing 23 13 Moose
  • The Geology of Switzerland Township, Monroe County, Ohio1

    The Geology of Switzerland Township, Monroe County, Ohio1

    THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE VOL. LIU JANUARY, 1953 No. 1 THE GEOLOGY OF SWITZERLAND TOWNSHIP, MONROE COUNTY, OHIO1 THOMAS ARKLE, JR.2 Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Columbus 10 The aim of this report is twofold. It is primarily an attempt to summarize the geologic events that transpired in the past as interpreted from the exposed rocks in Switzerland Township, the Ohio River valley, and in the broader region of Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Secondly, this report summarizes the structural and economic geology of Switzerland Township and immediate environs. HISTORY AND ECONOMIC SETTING OF SWITZERLAND TOWNSHIP In April 1819, ten German and Swiss families embarked on a flat boat on the Aar River enroute to Berne, Switzerland, and thence on the Rhine to Antwerp, Belgium. After 48 days aboard the Eugenius, a French vessel bound for New York, they landed at Amboy, New Jersey. Six families purchased teams for the overland trek to Wheeling, West Virginia. At the mouth of Captina Creek at the present site of Powhatan Point, Ohio, they found two Pennsylvania Dutch men who informed them that there was plenty of government land in Monroe County, Ohio. On September 15, Father Tischer and part of his band continued down river 15 miles to Bare's Landing, Ohio Township, and the remainder settled in the hills above Powhatan Point. Switzerland Township, an area of about 28 square miles, was organized by the latter group January 1, 1827. These early settlers selected a small portion of the maturely dissected Allegheny Plateau (fig. 1) as the site for their new home.
  • Stream Reconnaissance for Nutrients and Other Water-Quality Parameters, Greater Pittsburgh Region, Pennsylvania

    Stream Reconnaissance for Nutrients and Other Water-Quality Parameters, Greater Pittsburgh Region, Pennsylvania

    STREAM RECONNAISSANCE FOR NUTRIENTS AND OTHER WATER· QUALITY PARAMETERS, GREATER PITTSBURGH REGION, PENNSYLVANIA U.S. Geological Survey Water • Resources Investigations 50-7 4 BIBLIOGR"APHIC DATA l1. Report No. 3. Recipient 's Accession No. SHEET 4. T itle and Subtitle 5. Report Date STREAM RECONNAISSANCE FOR NUTRIENTS AND OTHER WATER-QUALITY February 1975 PARAMETERS, GREATER PITTSBURGH REGION, PENNSYLVANIA 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Rept. Robert M. Beall No. WRI 50-74 9. P erforming Organiza tion Name and Address 10. ·Project/ T ask/ Work Unit No. Greater Pittsburgh Regional Studies U.S. Geological Survey 11. Contract/ Grant No. P.O. Box 420 Carnegie. Pennsylvania 15106 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Re port & Period C oyered Same as 9. above. Final 14. 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstracts Eighty-five stream sites in and near the six-county Greater Pittsburgh Region were sampled in mid-June 1971 and again in mid-October 1972. Concentrations of inorganic nitrogen, organic carbon, or phosphorus were high enough to indicate potential problems at about a quarter of the sampling sites. Temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH values indicated a generally favorable capacity for recovery from degradation, although a number of streams east of the Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers ar~ marginal or lacking. Regionally, sulfate is the dominant ion and was observed in concentrations of 40 milligrams per litre· or more at 90 percent of the sites. Bicarbonate exceeded 100 milligrams per litre at 22 sites. A moderate to high degree of mineralization is indicated by conductance readings of more than 500 micromhos per centimetre at half of the sampling sites.
  • 3745-1-13 Central Ohio Tributaries Drainage Basin. (A) The

    3745-1-13 Central Ohio Tributaries Drainage Basin. (A) The

    3745-1-13 Central Ohio tributaries drainage basin. (A) The water bodies listed in table 13-1 of this rule are ordered from downstream to upstream. Tributaries of a water body are indented. The aquatic life habitat, water supply and recreation use designations are defined in rule 3745-1-07 of the Administrative Code. The state resource water use designation is defined in rule 3745-1-05 of the Administrative Code. The most stringent criteria associated with any one of the use designations assigned to a water body will apply to that water body. (B) Figure 1 of the appendix to this rule is a generalized map of the central Ohio tributaries drainage basin. (C) RM, as used in this rule, stands for river mile and refers to the method used by the Ohio environmental protection agency to identify locations along a water body. Mileage is defined as the lineal distance from the downstream terminus (i.e., mouth) and moving in an upstream direction. (D) The following symbols are used throughout this rule: * Designated use based on the 1978 water quality standards; + Designated use based on the results of a biological field assessment performed by the Ohio environmental protection agency; o Designated use based on justification other than the results of a biological field assessment performed by the Ohio environmental protection agency; and L An L in the warmwater habitat column signifies that the water body segment is designated limited warmwater habitat. 3745-1-13 2 Table 13-1. Use designations for water bodies in the central Ohio tributaries drainage basin.
  • June 21, 2003 (Pages 2849-2962)

    June 21, 2003 (Pages 2849-2962)

    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 33 (2003) Repository 6-21-2003 June 21, 2003 (Pages 2849-2962) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "June 21, 2003 (Pages 2849-2962)" (2003). Volume 33 (2003). 25. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003/25 This June is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 33 (2003) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 33 Number 25 Saturday, June 21, 2003 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 2849—2962 Agencies in this issue: The Courts Delaware River Basin Commission Department of Banking Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Public Welfare Department of Revenue Department of State Department of Transportation Environmental Quality Board Fish and Boat Commission Game Commission Health Care Cost Containment Council Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Liquor Control Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Regional Port Authority Public School Employees’ Retirement Board State Board of Certified Real Estate Appraisers State Board of Nursing State Board of Private Licensed Schools State Tax Equalization Board Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 343, June 2003 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa.
  • 12Th Susquehanna River Symposium Program with Abstracts Bucknell Center for Sustainability and the Environment

    12Th Susquehanna River Symposium Program with Abstracts Bucknell Center for Sustainability and the Environment

    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Susquehanna River Symposium -- Proceedings Events 2017 12th Susquehanna River Symposium Program with Abstracts Bucknell Center for Sustainability and the Environment Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/bcse-river-symposium- pubs Recommended Citation Bucknell Center for Sustainability and the Environment, "12th Susquehanna River Symposium Program with Abstracts" (2017). Susquehanna River Symposium -- Proceedings. 2. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/bcse-river-symposium-pubs/2 This Program (Publication) is brought to you for free and open access by the Events at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Susquehanna River Symposium -- Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SPIRIT OF TWO GREAT RIVERS: THE SUSQUEHANNA AND DELAWARE PROGRAM WITH ABSTRACTS 2017 Susquehanna River Symposium November 10-11, 2017 Bucknell University www.bucknell.edu/riversymposium Symposium Committee Benjamin Hayes, Ph.D., P.G. Director, Watershed Sciences and Engineering Program, Bucknell University Sean Reese, M.S. Aquatic Biologist, Watershed Sciences and Engineering Program, Bucknell University Jessica Newlin, Ph.D., P.E. Interim Executive Director, Center for Sustainability and the Environment Richard Crago, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering R. Craig Kochel, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences Matthew McTammany, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Biology Carol High Operations Manager, Bucknell Center for Sustainability and the Environment Belinda Bergin Administrative Assistant, Bucknell Center for Sustainability and the Environment Samantha Myers Administrative Assistant, Bucknell Center for Sustainability and the Environment H.W. “Skip” Wieder Executive Director, Susquehanna River Heartland Coalition for Environmental Studies Karen Morin, Ph.D.
  • Captina Creek Watershed Action Plan

    Captina Creek Watershed Action Plan

    Captina Creek Watershed Action Plan 2014 A Collaboration of the Belmont Soil and Water Conservation District and Captina Creek Watershed Stakeholders Belmont Soil and Water Conservation District 101 N. Market St., Suite A St. Clairsville, Ohio 43950 Phone: 740-526-0027 Fax: 740-526-0032 Website: http://www.belmontSWCD.org Cover photos courtesy of Dover Woods Photography Powhatan Point, Ohio Table of Contents List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..………iii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………….…… vii List of Appendices……………………………………………………………………………...…ix List of Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………….…….x Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………….….xi Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………...…xiii Section I: Watershed Overview Chapter 1: Introduction……………………………………………………………..……..2 Chapter 2: Defining the Watershed……………..……………………………………..…..4 Chapter 3: Watershed Demographics…………………………………………….……….9 Chapter 4: Watershed Geographic Locators……………………………………...……...15 Chapter 5: History of the Watershed and Restoration Efforts……………………...……17 Section II: Watershed Action Plan Development Chapter 1: Watershed Stakeholders and Partners…………………………………...…...23 Chapter 2: Partner Roles and Responsibilities………………………………………...…29 Chapter 3: Watershed Action Plan Development……………………………………..…32 Section III: Watershed Inventory Chapter 1: Geologic Description of the Watershed…………………………………...…37 Chapter 2: Biological Features of the Watershed……………………………………..…58 Chapter 3: Water Resources…………………………………………………………..….65 Chapter 4: Land Use in
  • Annual Report on Public Water System Violations Vermont Water Supply Division

    Annual Report on Public Water System Violations Vermont Water Supply Division

    Annual Report on Public Water System Violations Vermont Water Supply Division 103 South Main St. Waterbury, VT 05671-0403 (802) 241-3400 or 1-800-823-6500 in Vermont CALENDAR YEAR 2009 January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009 July 1, 2010 INTRODUCTION Vermont’s Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) is authorized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to administer the Public Water Supply System program in the state. DEC’s Water Supply Division implements the program. The Division’s primary goal is to ensure that citizens and visitors of the Green Mountain State have drinking water that is safe for human consumption. To maintain the authority to administer the program (also called primacy), the state has to implement and enforce rules that are at least as stringent as the federal drinking water regulations. To comply with federal regulations, DEC promulgated the State’s Water Supply Rule (Chapter 21 of the Environmental Protection Rules) on September 24, 1992. The rule was revised in 1996, 1999, 2002 and again in 2005 to incorporate the 1996 amendments to the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). The rule is in the process of being revised to adopt and incorporate by reference federal drinking water regulations promulgated after the last revision dated April 25, 2005 and make minor revisions to the rule. The new federal rules requiring adoption include the: January 4, 2006 Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfectant Byproducts Rule; January 5, 2006 Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule; October 10, 2007 Lead and Copper Short-Term Regulatory Revisions and Clarifications; and the November 8, 2009 Ground Water Rule.