Roy Lichtenstein Resource Pack About This Resource Contents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
OBITUARY: Sum of His Parts: John Coplans (1920-‐2003
OBITUARY: Sum of His Parts: John Coplans (1920-2003) ARTFORUM, Jan 2004 http://www.mutualart.com/OpenArticle/Sum-of-His-Parts--John-Coplans--1920- 200/6576ED6A4646BBD5 An obituary for John Coplans, an international photographer who died in Aug 2003 at the age of 83 is presented. Among other things, Coplans became an internationally successful photographer oVer the last two decades by focusing his lens on his intensely personal yet oddly alien terra incognita. To readers under a certain age (say, thirty-five), the name John Coplans probably conjures pictures of a hairy, schlumpy, climacteric bag of flesh. Turning his body into a liVing landscape tableau, Coplans became an internationally successful photographer oVer the last two decades by focusing his lens on this intensely personal yet oddly alien terra incognita. Photography was in fact the third full career Coplans, who died last August at age eighty-three, enjoyed. In his lifetime, the Britishborn, South African-raised figure neVer followed the straight trajectory. If it is rare to find an indiVidual who flourishes in a new milieu when most are tidying up the achieVements of a lifelong pursuit, "lateness" is hardly a conceit foreign to Coplans`s biography. Indeed, his record is inflected both by the notion of belatedness and by its antonymic partner, prescience. As a curator at the Pasadena Art Museum in the mid-`6os, Coplans was among the earliest champions of Pop art and a Vociferously sympathetic critic of the work of Roy Lichtenstein and especially Andy Warhol. (He organized a surVey of Pop as early as 1:963 and later was responsible for retrospectiVes of Lichtenstein and Warhol as well as the 1968 "Serial Imagery" exhibition.) But despite his reputation as a curator ahead of the curVe, Coplans largely abandoned museum work until 1978, when he became director of the Akron Art Museum. -
Andy Warhol Who Later Became the Most
Jill Crotty FSEM Warhol: The Businessman and the Artist At the start of the 1960s Roy Lichtenstein, Claes Oldenburg and Robert Rauschenberg were the kings of the emerging Pop Art era. These artists transformed ordinary items of American culture into famous pieces of art. Despite their significant contributions to this time period, it was Andy Warhol who later became the most recognizable icon of the Pop Art Era. By the mid sixties Lichtenstein, Oldenburg and Rauschenberg each had their own niche in the Pop Art market, unlike Warhol who was still struggling to make sales. At one point it was up to Ivan Karp, his dealer, to “keep moving things moving forward until the artist found representation whether with Castelli or another gallery.” 1Meanwhile Lichtenstein became known for his painted comics, Oldenburg made sculptures of mass produced food and Rauschenberg did combines (mixtures of everyday three dimensional objects) and gestural paintings. 2 These pieces were marketable because of consumer desire, public recognition and aesthetic value. In later years Warhol’s most well known works such as Turquoise Marilyn (1964) contained all of these aspects. Some marketable factors were his silk screening technique, his choice of known subjects, his willingness to adapt his work, his self promotion, and his connection to art dealers. However, which factor of Warhol’s was the most marketable is heavily debated. I believe Warhol’s use of silk screening, well known subjects, and self 1 Polsky, R. (2011). The Art Prophets. (p. 15). New York: Other Press New York. 2 Schwendener, Martha. (2012) "Reinventing Venus And a Lying Puppet." New York Times, April 15. -
View Map of Healing Garden Artwork
Mark Ackerman • Nicolas Africano • Yaacov Agam • Jonathan Agger • Anni Albers • Josef Albers • Lita Albuquerque • Pierre Alechinsky • Peter Alexander • Elray Alkristy • Otmar Alt • John Altoon • Amos Amit • Othello Anderson • Michael Ansell • Karel Appel • Shusaku Arakawa • Cynthia Archer • Ardison Phillips • Jim Arkatov • Arman • Robert Arneson • Charles Arnoldi • Lisa Aronzon • Fred Arundel • Tadashi Asoma • Chet Atkins • Mario Avanti • Judith Azur • Olle Baertling • Claude Baillargeon • Richard Baker • Micha Bar-Am • Lynda Barckert • Lionel Barrymore • Frank Barsotti • Frank Beatty • David Marc Belkin • Gerald Belkin • Larry Bell • Mark Bellog • Lynda Benglis • Billy Al Bengston • Fletcher Benton • Dimitrie Berea • Don Berger • Joseph Bergler, The Younger • Elizabeth V. Blackadder • Lucienne Bloch • Karl Blossfeldt • Howard Bond • John Robert Borgstahl • Jonathan Borofsky • Richard Bosman • Paul Brach • Matthew Brady • Charles Bragg • Warren Brandt • Bettina Brendel • Ernest Briggs • Charlie Brown • Christopher Brown • James Paul Brown • Jerry Burchman • Hans Burkhardt • Bob Burley • Sakti Burman • Jerry Byrd • Alexander Calder • Jo Ann Callis • Tom Carr • Stuart Caswell • Marc Chagall • Judy Chicago • Christo • Clutie • Jodi Cobb • Jean Cocteau • Bruce Cohen • Larry Cohen • Chuck Connelly ARTIST • Greg / WORKConstantine • Ron Cooper • Greg Copeland • Amy Cordova • Sam Coronado • Steven Cortright • Robert Cottingham • Arnold Crane • Barbara Crane • Jeff Crisman • Chris Cross • Yvonne Cross • Ford Crull • Woody Crumbo • William Crutchfield -
Treatment of Donald Judd's Untitled 1977
Article: Treatment of Donald Judd’s Untitled 1977: Retention of the original acrylic sheets Author(s): Eleonora E. Nagy, Bettina Landgrebe, and Shelley M. Smith Source: Objects Specialty Group Postprints, Volume Eighteen, 2011 Pages: 113-125 Compilers: Sanchita Balachandran, Christine Del Re, and Carolyn Riccardelli © 2011 by The American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works, 1156 15th Street NW, Suite 320, Washington, DC 20005. (202) 452-9545 www.conservation-us.org Under a licensing agreement, individual authors retain copyright to their work and extend publications rights to the American Institute for Conservation. Objects Specialty Group Postprints is published annually by the Objects Specialty Group (OSG) of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works (AIC). A membership benefit of the Objects Specialty Group, Objects Specialty Group Postprints is mainly comprised of papers presented at OSG sessions at AIC Annual Meetings and is intended to inform and educate conservation-related disciplines. Papers presented in Objects Specialty Group Postprints, Volume Eighteen, 2011 have been edited for clarity and content but have not undergone a formal process of peer review. This publication is primarily intended for the members of the Objects Specialty Group of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works. Responsibility for the methods and materials described herein rests solely with the authors, whose articles should not be considered official statements of the OSG or the AIC. The OSG is an approved division of the AIC but does not necessarily represent the AIC policy or opinions. TREATMENT OF DONALD JUDD’S UNTITLED 1977: RETENTION OF THE ORIGINAL ACRYLIC SHEETS ELEONORA E. -
Early Roy Lichtenstein: a Fount of Insight on Postwar America
Early Roy Lichtenstein: A fount of insight on postwar America By Murray Whyte Globe Staff,Updated May 7, 2021, 47 minutes ago Roy Lichtenstein's "Washington Crossing the Delaware II," from about 1951.ESTATE OF ROY LICHTENSTEIN/COURTESY OF GABRIEL MILLER WATERVILLE, Maine — In 1940, an Ohio State undergraduate named Roy Lichtenstein — yes, that Roy Lichtenstein — made a loose and gestural ink sketch of Paul Bunyan felling a tree with a mighty swing. He passed it off to his roommate with a wink. Keep it, he said. I’m going to be famous someday. Someday came, and famous he was, though not for works like that. In 1961, Lichtenstein made “Look Mickey,” his first-ever appropriation of a four-color pulp illustration. (He lifted it from the 1960 kids’ book “Donald Duck: Lost and Found.”) That anchored him as one of the pillars of the thoroughly American Pop Art movement. But “Roy Lichtenstein: History in the Making, 1948-1960,” at the Colby College Museum of Art, isn’t about any of that. It’s about Lichtenstein before he became Lichtenstein, and it’s a revelation: A fresh view of an artist who reached a saturation point so long ago he can feel as familiar and over-worn as old wallpaper. “History in the Making” is instead unfamiliar, exhilaratingly so, spanning the artist’s long teaching stints in Cleveland and upstate New York, up to a breath before that fateful Mickey steered his course into mass-cultural history. The show captures a young artist in a postwar moment, unmoved by the sunny optimism of a burgeoning American dream and driven to peel back its thin myths. -
Pop Art with Roy Lichtenstein
January 2020 The Studiowith ART HIST RY KIDS Pop Art with Roy Lichtenstein Observe | Discuss | Discover | Create | Connect Pop Art with The Studiowith Roy Lichtenstein ART HIST RY KIDS INTRODUCTION The art of the ordinary Roy Lichtenstein’s successful art career was based on one simple idea – creating fine art inspired by images we see everyday. His art captures the ordinary things that surround us – advertisements, comic books, the painting of other famous artists like Picasso, Mondrian, Matisse, and Monet, and even Micky Mouse cartoons. He took these ideas and recreated them on a larger than life scale. Most of his can- vases are grand and oversized – they are truly bold and impactful when seen in person! He also infused little bits of commentary in his art, and he became known for his skillful use of parody. You don’t need to study every piece of art that’s included in this guide. Feel free to choose just a few that are most interesting to your kids. A range of subject matter is included here, but if some of these paintings are too intense for your kids– just skip them for now, and come back to them when they are older! There’s no hurry, and there are plenty of paintings included here that are perfect for young kids. Pop Art looks out into the world. This is your week to look closely at the “ art and chat about it. We’ll learn all It doesn’t look like a painting of about Lichtenstein and his art next something, it looks like the thing week. -
Hold Still: Looking at Photorealism RICHARD KALINA
Hold Still: Looking at Photorealism RICHARD KALINA 11 From Lens to Eye to Hand: Photorealism 1969 to Today presents nearly fifty years of paintings and watercolors by key Photorealist taken care of by projecting and tracing a photograph on the canvas, and the actual painting consists of varying degrees (depending artists, and provides an opportunity to reexamine the movement’s methodology and underlying structure. Although Photorealism on the artist) of standard under- and overpainting, using the photograph as a color reference. The abundance of detail and incident, can certainly be seen in connection to the history, style, and semiotics of modern representational painting (and to a lesser extent while reinforcing the impression of demanding skill, actually makes things easier for the artist. Lots of small things yield interesting late-twentieth-century art photography), it is worth noting that those ties are scarcely referred to in the work itself. Photorealism is textures—details reinforce neighboring details and cancel out technical problems. It is the larger, less inflected areas (like skies) that contained, compressed, and seamless, intent on the creation of an ostensibly logical, self-evident reality, a visual text that relates are more trouble, and where the most skilled practitioners shine. almost entirely to its own premises: the stressed interplay between the depiction of a slice of unremarkable three-dimensional reality While the majority of Photorealist paintings look extremely dense and seem similarly constructed from the ground up, that similarity is and the meticulous hand-painted reproduction of a two-dimensional photograph. Each Photorealist painting is a single, unambiguous, most evident either at a normal viewing distance, where the image snaps together, or in the reducing glass of photographic reproduction. -
Roy Lichtenstein, Sociedad Moderna Como Expresión Artística. Rocio Castillo Rojas. “El Pop Art Mira Hacia El Mundo. No Parec
Roy Lichtenstein, sociedad moderna como expresión artística. Rocio Castillo Rojas. “El Pop Art mira hacia el mundo. No parece una pintura de algo, se parece a la cosa en sí misma”1. De esta forma Roy Lichtenstein intentaba responder la pregunta del crítico de arte, G.R. Swenson, ¿Qué es el Pop Art? (1963) y es que para entonces ya se reconocía el valor de sus obras para el enaltecimiento artístico de la sociedad moderna. A fines de los 50, el Pop Art surgía como reacción al Expresionismo Abstracto representando imágenes y elementos de la sociedad moderna caracterizada por el consumismo, los medios de comunicación masivos, la moda, la tecnología, el capitalismo, etc. Sus principales impulsores buscaban convertir la cotidianeidad de la cultura occidental en una obra estética de forma crítica e inteligente, entre ellos destaca la obra de Roy Lichtenstein. Lichtenstein nace en 1923, en Nueva York, EEUU, siendo el primero de dos hijos del matrimonio entre Milton y Beatrice Lichtenstein. Desde joven presentó habilidades artísticas y musicales: dibujaba, pintaba, esculpía, tocaba piano y clarinete, y desarrollo una gran afición por el jazz. El verano de 1940, año en que se graduó de preparatoria, estudió pintura y dibujo en la Art Students League de Nueva York con Reginald Marsh. Ese mismo año ingresó a la Facultad de Educación de la Universidad Estatal de Ohio, pero no fue hasta 1946 que logró graduarse como Bachelor of Fine Art, desde entonces comenzó su carrera como académico en la misma Universidad Estatal de Ohio y en paralelo preparó su maestría la cual obtuvo en 1949. -
Dorothy Lichtenstein (Dl)
THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ORAL HISTORY PROGRAM INTERVIEW WITH: DOROTHY LICHTENSTEIN (DL) NTERVIEWER: AGNES GUND (AG) LOCATION: NEW YORK, NEW YORK DATE: MAY 6, 1998 BEGIN MINICASSETTE MASTER TAPE 1, SIDE A AG: I'd like to thank you, first of all, for doing this. It's very nice of you. The first question that I'd like to ask you is, how did you and Roy meet, the first time? DL: The first time we met, I was working at a gallery, the Bianchini Gallery. That was around the corner from the Castelli Gallery at 4 East 77th Street. We were on 78th Street, and, in fact, that's the gallery that Rosa Esmond has now, Ubu Gallery [16 East 78th Street]. AG: Oh, is that her gallery? DL: Yes. We were doing a show called The Great American Supermarket, based on the fact that so much of the work in the early '60s imitated commercial products and ads, so we thought to set the exhibition up. AG: That's great. And this was a contemporary gallery? DL: Yes. When I started working there, Paul Bianchini owned it, and he did mostly drawing shows of modern masters, but, say, French and Europeans and mostly pre-war, but he would have had Dubuffet and Giacometti. AG: And he was a friend of Leo's [Castelli]. MoMA Archives Oral History: D. Lichtenstein page 1 of 29 DL: Well, he ran this gallery. He knew Leo, and of course it was very exciting. We thought Leo's gallery was the most exciting place. -
Art: the Future Is Comics Gabriel Galway
Art: The Future is Comics Gabriel Galway Art: The Future is Comics My second year project in college was to create a graphic novel about my life. In earlier discussions with my tutors I was trying to convince them that comics are an art form. They were not convinced and could not understand such a concept and disagreed. I was advised to try and explore a different avenue. However, in later discussions I told my tutors that “each panel would be an individual painting or piece of art in itself, and that the “graphic novel” would be “the gallery space”.” They agreed that this could be art but perhaps only under these conditions. Comics are a form of high art. The Last Supper, Leonardo Da Vinci, 1495–1498 Art: The Future is Comics Gabriel Galway Arkham Asylum: a serious house on serious earth, Grant Morrison & Dave McKean, 1989 To paraphrase Joseph Campbell: true Art should stop you, not move you. There is no reason why the image above from Grant Morrison and Dave McKean’s “Arkham Asylum” should not be considered a form of fine art like Leonardo Divinci’s “Last Supper”. “Comics”, have developed a bad reputation of being considered cheap and trashy books made to be sold to kids in order to make money. Perhaps they once were; bad stories, with terrible illustrations printed on cheap newsprint. Because of this fact that defines comics so narrowly we fail to understand their true potential. Comics have come a long way and have proven their potential to be considered a form of fine art. -
National Gallery of Art News Release
* ** ** National Gallery of Art News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Tina Coplan July 8, 1991 Liz Kimball (202) 842-6353 INNOVATIVE ART FROM GRAPHICSTUDIO AT NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART. SEPTEMBER 15 WASHINGTON, D.C. A survey of more than ninety prints and edition sculptures produced during the last two decades at Graphicstudio by some of America's foremost contemporary artists will be presented September 15, 1991, through January 5, 1992, in the West Building of the National Gallery of Art. Graphicstudio, founded in 1968 by artist Donald Saff at the University of South Florida, Tampa, has become one of the leading workshops in the United States engaged in unique research in the production of fine art editions. Graphicstudio; Contemporary Art from the Collaborative Workshop at the University of South Florida will feature a diverse selection of subjects, styles, and media, produced by twenty-four artists working with Graphicstudio's versatile staff. In addition to the completed works, the show will include a selection of working drawings and other preparatory materials never before exhibited. "This exhibition, drawn from the Graphicstudio Archive which was established at the National Gallery in 1986, includes extraordinary prints and edition sculptures produced with a great deal of imagination, innovation, and technical complexity by some of America's most talented artists," said J. Carter Brown, director of the National Gallery of Art. -more- fourth Street in Constitution Avenue NW Washington DC 20565 (202) 842 6353 Facsimile (202) 289 5446 graphicstudio . page 2 "The Graphicstudio exhibition at the National Gallery is the ultimate recognition of our mission at the University of South Florida, which is to create new knowledge through art," said Alan Eaker, director of Graphicstudio. -
Cataclysm and Challenge Impact of September 11, 2001, on Our Nation’S Cultural Heritage
Cataclysm and Challenge Impact of September 11, 2001, on Our Nation’s Cultural Heritage A Report by Heritage Preservation Cover: Sphere for Plaza Fountainby Fritz Koenig underwent a transformation as a result of the events of September 11, 2001. Originally installed at the World Trade Center (top left), it survived the collapse of the neighboring Towers partially intact (top right). After cleaning, it was moved to Battery Park and rededicated in its damaged state as a memorial to the victims of the terrorist attack (bottom photos). Credits: Top left, courtesy the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Top right, photo by Bri Rodriguez/FEMA News Photo Bottom photos by Kyra Skvir © 2002 Heritage Preservation, Inc. All rights reserved. Heritage Preservation receives funding from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. Printed in the United States of America Cataclysm and Challenge Impact of September 11, 2001, on Our Nation’s Cultural Heritage A report by Heritage Preservation on behalf of the Heritage Emergency National Task Force Ruth Hargraves, Project Director The Bay Foundation of New York City and the National Endowment for the Humanities generously provided funding for this report. Acknowledgements We wish to thank all those who so willingly shared their experiences of September 11 through interviews, written documentation, telephone conversations, and electronic narratives. We particu- larly applaud the staff members who responded to our survey while still coping with recovery after the tragedy.