DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 AAU B.Arch Architecture Program Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015 AAU B.Arch Architecture Program Report Academy of Art University School of Architecture Architecture Program Report for 2015 NAAB Visit for Initial Accreditation Bachelor of Architecture 162 Credits Year of the Previous Visit: 2014 Current Term of Accreditation: “the proposed professional architecture program: Bachelor of Architecture was formally granted continuation of its candidacy for a period of not less than two years. The continued candidacy term is effective January 1, 2014.” “The request for a visit for initial accreditation in fall 2015 is approved and the visit has been added to the 2015 NAAB Visit List.” Submitted to: The National Architectural Accrediting Board Date: March 13, 2015 ii Academy of Art University Architecture Program Report-Initial Accreditation March 2015 Program Director: Jennifer Asselstine, AIA, [email protected], 415-274-2200 School of Architecture Executive Director: Mimi Sullivan, AIA, [email protected],415-274-2200 Chief Academic Officer of the Institution: Alana Addison, [email protected], 415-274-2200 President of Academy of Art University: Dr. Elisa Stephens, [email protected] 415-274-2200 Individual submitting the Architecture Program Report: Mr. Joe Vollaro, Executive Vice President of Financial Aid and Compliance, [email protected], 415-274-2200 Name of individual to whom questions should be directed: Mr. Joe Vollaro, Executive Vice President of Financial Aid and Compliance, [email protected], 415-274-2200 iii Academy of Art University Architecture Program Report-Initial Accreditation March 2015 Table of Contents Section Page Part One (I): Institutional Support and Commitment to Continuous Improvement ............................................... 1 I.1. Identity & Self-Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 1 I.1.1. History Mission ......................................................................................................................................... 1 I.1.2. Learning Culture and Social Equity ........................................................................................................ 8 I.1.3. Response to the Five Perspectives ........................................................................................................ 10 I.1.4. Long-Range Planning ........................................................................................................................... 15 I.1.5. Program Self-Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 22 I.2. Resources .................................................................................................................................................... 31 I.2.1. Human Resources & Human Resource Development ......................................................................... 31 I.2.2. Administrative Structure & Governance .................................................................................................. 37 I.2.3. Physical Resources ................................................................................................................................ 39 I.2.4. Financial Resources .......................................................................................................................... 43 I.2.5. Information Resources .......................................................................................................................... 48 I.3. Institutional Characteristics ......................................................................................................................... 54 I.3.1. Statistical Reports ..................................................................................................................................... 54 I.3.2. Annual Reports ........................................................................................................................................ 54 I.4. Policy Review .......................................................................................................................................... 68 Part Two (II). Educational Outcomes and Curriculum ......................................................................................... 68 II.1.1. Student Performance Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 68 II.2. Curricular Framework .............................................................................................................................. 70 II.2.1. Regional Accreditation ........................................................................................................................... 70 II.2.2. Professional Degrees and Curriculum .................................................................................................... 76 II.2.3. Curriculum Review and Development ................................................................................................... 85 II.3. Evaluation of Preparatory/Pre- Professional Education ............................................................................... 85 II.4. Public Information ....................................................................................................................................... 86 II.4.1. Statement on NAAB-Accredited Degrees ................................................................................................ 86 II.4.2. Access to NAAB Conditions and Procedures ........................................................................................... 86 II.4.3. Access to Career Development information ............................................................................................. 86 II.4.4. Public Access to APRS and VTRS ........................................................................................................... 86 II.4.5. ARE Pass Rates ...................................................................................................................................... 86 Part Three (III): Progress Since Last Site Visit ....................................................................................................... 87 III.1. Summary of Responses to the Team Findings ....................................................................................... 87 a. Responses to Conditions Not Met ............................................................................................................... 87 b. Responses to Causes of Concern ............................................................................................................... 89 iv Academy of Art University Architecture Program Report-Initial Accreditation March 2015 III.2. Summary of Responses to Changes in the NAAB Conditions: ............................................................... 91 Part Four (IV): Supplemental Information ..................................................................................................................... 92 IV.1. Description of policies and procedures for evaluating student work ..................................................................... 92 IV.2. Course Descriptions ....................................................................................................................................... 93 IV.3. Faculty Resumes ......................................................................................................................................... 126 IV.4. Visiting Team Report (VTR) from the previous visit. ................................................................................ 208 IV.5. Catalog (or URL for retrieving online catalogs and related materials) ...................................................... 252 v Academy of Art University Architecture Program Report-Initial Accreditation March 2015 This page is left blank intentionally. vi Academy of Art University Architecture Program Report-Initial Accreditation March 2015 Part One (I): Institutional Support and Commitment to Continuous Improvement I.1. Identity & Self-Assessment I.1.1. History Mission History, Mission, Founding Principles of Academy of Art University (The Academy, AAU) The Academy was founded in San Francisco in 1929 as the Academy of Advertising Art by fine art painter Richard S. Stephens and his wife, Clara. Mr. Stephens, an art director of Sunset magazine, opened AAU based on the philosophy that aspiring artists and designers, with hard work, dedication, and proper instruction, can learn the skills needed to become successful professionals. To make this vision a reality, Stephens hired instructors who were working artists, familiar with the realities and demands of the marketplace. The school attracted a distinguished faculty of practicing artists and designers, and one of its core educational practices was firmly defined: hire established professionals to teach future professionals. Today, AAU is the largest regionally-accredited private art and design school in the United States. AAU’s 15,800 students come from 112 countries to study both in San Francisco, a city known for the vibrancy of its art and design community, and online through AAU’s Cyber Campus. In addition to offering M.Arch and B.Arch degrees in Architecture, the Academy also offers AA, BA, BFA, MA and MFA degrees in Acting, Advertising, Animation and Visual Effects, Art Education, Art History, , Fashion, Fashion Journalism, Fashion Styling, Fine Art,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Making Design Concepts in the Nineties. Theoretical Models of UN
    Ŕ periodica polytechnica Making design concepts in the nineties. Architecture Theoretical models of UN Studio 40/2 (2009) 55–63 doi: 10.3311/pp.ar.2009-2.02 Zoltán Bun web: http://www.pp.bme.hu/ar c Periodica Polytechnica 2009 RESEARCH ARTICLE Received 2010-02-18 Abstract At the very end of the 1980s, the previously determinative Attending to the thinking of the second half of the twentieth past that had been incarcerated in the museum and globalisa- century there has been a shift from the related-causal image tion hand in hand with capitalism were to change gear to turbo- of science to a kind of classification (the examination of local boost. ‘Poststructuralism’ was at war with ‘postmodernism’, singularities), from closed disciplines to their in-betweenness, both in general and architectural thinking. Following difference- from abstract views to pragmatic, then in the territory of archi- philosophy and other social studies, architectural deconstruc- tecture from the direct representation of drawings to generative- tion had questioned the logos-centrism of the discipline and it organisational model of a diagram, from reactive-post-critical had success and great influence in the fields of liberating var- theory to a proactive and productive one. Pluralism and rela- ious layers of rigid structures and rules. The abstract theory, tivity has taken the place of dominating and universal modes of a kind of ‘textual organisation’ that meets material world, did thought, discrete-networked models have been playing a lead- not just pose important questions but it caused serious problems ing role beside continuous-linear ones, as have digital aspects itself: theory made an elitist exodus from everyday life, differ- beside analogue ones, as blob forms beside boxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Works Contents
    selected works Contents Contact 02 Profile 05 Architecture Cultural 21 Infrastructure 47 Office & Commercial 73 Residential 105 Units Urban 135 Interior 153 Product 163 Innovation Knowledge 177 Futures 189 UNSense 193 Contact UNStudio UNStudio Asia Business Development Business Development Amsterdam Shanghai contacts: contacts: Stadhouderskade 113 Machteld Kors Room 4606 Nora Schueler 1073 AX Amsterdam [email protected] Raffles City, No. 268 [email protected] PO Box 75381 Xizang Middle Road Teun Bimbergen Maggie Sun 1070 AJ Amsterdam Shanghai 200001 [email protected] [email protected] The Netherlands China T +31 (0)20 570 20 40 Marisa Cortright T +86 21 6340 5088 Sarah Zheng F +31 (0)20 570 20 41 [email protected] F +86 21 3366 3302 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Giulia Carravieri www.unstudio.com www.unstudio.com [email protected] Niki Pliakogianni 中国上海市西藏中路268号 Frankfurt [email protected] 来福士广场办公楼4606室 邮编 200001 Carleigh Shannon An der Welle 4 #528 [email protected] 60322 Frankfurt Germany Hong Kong T +49 69 6593 7580 [email protected] Room 1102-1105 Yu Yuet Lai Building 43-55 Wyndham Street UNSense Central, Hong Kong T +852 3499 1261 F +852 3563 8200 Plantage Middenlaan 62 [email protected] 1018 DH Amsterdam www.unstudio.com The Netherlands [email protected] www.unsense.com 4 Profile Profile 5 Profile Background About UNStudio Selected Pivotal Projects Founded in 1988 by Ben van Berkel and Acclaimed UNStudio projects include Caroline Bos, UNStudio is an international Arnhem Central Station (The Netherlands), architectural design studio specialising the Mercedes-Benz Museum, Stuttgart in architecture, urban development, (Germany), the Raffles City Hangzhou infrastructure and interior and product mixed-use development (China), the design.
    [Show full text]
  • BNA Kubus for Ben Van Berkel and Caroline Bos of Unstudio
    BNA Kubus for Ben van Berkel and Caroline Bos of UNStudio The 2016 BNA Kubus has been awarded to the founders of UNStudio, Ben van Berkel (architect) and Caroline Bos (art historian / urban planner). The aim of the architecture prize, this year bestowed for the 41st time by the Royal Institute of Dutch Architects (abbreviated as BNA), is to express the institute’s appreciation for an exceptional contribution to architecture. The Kubus was awarded on the recommendation of a jury made up of Nathalie de Vries (chair), Steven Nobel, Ton Idsinga, Wienke Bodewes, Willem Hein Schenk and Willem Jan Neutelings. The presentation ceremony will take place on 3 November in Amsterdam. Extract from the jury report The jury concluded that Van Berkel and Bos, together with their UNStudio team, are more than deserved winners of the 2016 BNA Kubus. 'No one controls the creative and technical process better than UNStudio. They prove that in-depth research pays off, as does network-driven collaboration with professionals in the fields of architecture, infrastructure and urban development. The cutting-edge nature and absolute craftsmanship of their body of work makes it both exemplary and innovative.' High quality, iconic buildings and international appeal The jury’s decision was based on three criteria: excellent craftsmanship, a recognisable and innovative body of work, and a relevant contribution to the profession. From the time UNStudio was established in 1988, Van Berkel and Bos have been building up an impressive body of work, according to the jury. Their work is always of high quality, the buildings are iconic and have international appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Media Release
    MEDIA RELEASE 19 APR 2018 STRICTLY EMBARGOED UNTIL 00.01 BST 19 APRIL 2018 UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN’S FUTURE CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL DESIGN COMPETITION SHORTLIST ANNOUNCED Clockwise from top left: Sheila O’Donnell and John Tuomey © Amelia Stein / Steven Holl © Steven Holl Architects / Liz Diller and Ricardo Scofidio © Abelardo Morell, Benjamin Gilmartin © Diller Scofidio + Renfro andCharles Renfro © Alessio Boni / Ben van Berkel and Caroline Bos © Inga Powilleit / Daniel Libeskind © Stefan Ruiz / John Ronan © Nathanael Filbert Ninety-eight teams from 28 countries enter competition and UCD expands shortlist from five to six teams in recognition of outstanding response from international design community University College Dublin and Malcolm Reading Consultants (MRC) revealed today [19 April 2018] the six shortlisted teams in the Future Campus – University College Dublin International Design Competition. The teams were the unanimous choice of a selection panel that was chaired by the competition jury chair Professor Andrew J. Deeks, President of University College Dublin. The shortlist was expanded from the expected five to six in recognition of the outstanding response from the international design community. The finalist teams won their places on the basis of submissions scored on relevant experience and team composition. First Floor, 8 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3BP +44 (0) 207 831 2998 | www.malcolmreading.com MEDIA RELEASE 19 APR 2018 The six teams (in alphabetical order by lead consultant with full details in Notes below) are: • Diller Scofidio + Renfro (US) • John Ronan Architects (US) • O’Donnell + Tuomey (Ireland) • Steven Holl Architects (US) • Studio Libeskind (US) • UNStudio (Netherlands) The first stage of the competition attracted 98 teams from 28 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue Autumn 2010
    Representation 64 Index 62 Performing Arts 61 Fashion and Style 58 Industrial Design 56 Graphic Design 51 Photography 37 Art 23 Architecture 2 When ordering, please use Idea Codes. September 2010. Titles marked with an asterisk had been not yet published (*) in Prices are in Euros and may change without notice. Consult our website www.ideabooks.nl for the complete list. This catalogue is aselected list of new titles. www.ideabooks.nl e-mail [email protected] 20fax 6209299 +31 20 6226154tel +31 The Netherlands RK Amsterdam1011 Nieuwe Herengracht 11 Autumn Catalogue 2010 Contents General Information Idea Books <–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––210 mm–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––> 00 –– 00 –– 00 –– 00 –– 1 00 –– 00 –– 00 –– 01 –– 02 –– 03 –– 05 –– 06 –– 07 –– 08 –– 09 –– 10 –– 11 –– 12 –– 13 –– 15 –– 16 –– 17 –– 18 –– 19 –– 20 –– 21 –– 22 –– 23 –– 25 –– 26 –– 27 –– 28 –– 29 –– 30 –– 31 –– 32 –– steeds 7 inits per pag te beginnen met bovenste deel op pagina 1 El Croquis 149: Collective Experiments II El Croquis 150: David Chipperfield El Croquis 148/149: Collective Experiments El Croquis, El Escorial 2010 2006 2010 El Croquis, El Escorial 2010 ISBN 978 84 88386 58 8 El Croquis, El Escorial 2010 ISBN 978 84 88386 57 1 € 52.80 — Idea Code 10181 ISBN 978 84 88386 59 5 € 100.15 — Idea Code 10363 One of the main arguments in the narratives of € 58.15 — Idea Code 10292 Valuable hardback compendium of El Croquis modernity, though often disputed, is that which Issue dedicated to the projects and finished build- issues 148 and 149, covering innovative contempo- relates its urgency with the development of new ings of David Chipperfield in the last four years.
    [Show full text]
  • UN Studio: Design Models, Architecture, Urbanism, Infrastructure
    UN Studio: Design Models, Architecture, Urbanism, Infrastructure 2008 #Ben van Berkel, Caroline Bos #UN Studio: Design Models, Architecture, Urbanism, Infrastructure #Thames & Hudson, 2008 #0500287163, 9780500287163 #In the seventeen years since Ben van Berkel and Caroline Bos established their studio in Amsterdam, they have continually pushed the boundaries of contemporary architecture, seeking new design practices and building solutions. With major projects recently completed or approaching completion in Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Korea and the Netherlands, and with teaching appointments in Germany and the United States, UN Studio is creating some of the most innovative and respected work of their generation. When their Mercedes-Benz Museum opens in Stuttgart in 2006, it will cement the rise of one of Europe̕s most influential architecture practices. This is the complete monograph of UN Studio̕s output. From a live-work house based on a Möbius strip to radical infrastructure projects, such as bridges and transportation hubs, from power stations to museums, the practice has subtly, but profoundly, reinvented a number of standard building types and proposed radical new modes of collaboration in the digital age. The book presents concepts and buildings in detail from the generative diagram, through the digital modelling process, to construction and final outcome. Bookending the projects is a second essay which contemplates the role and representation of contemporary architecture in today's culture, offering new ways to generate interesting
    [Show full text]
  • BNA Kubus for Ben Van Berkel and Caroline Bos of Unstudio
    BNA Kubus for Ben van Berkel and Caroline Bos of UNStudio The 2016 BNA Kubus has been awarded to the founders of UNStudio, Ben van Berkel (architect) and Caroline Bos (art historian / urban planner). The aim of the architecture prize, this year bestowed for the 41st time by the Royal Institute of Dutch Architects (abbreviated as BNA), is to express the institute’s appreciation for an exceptional contribution to architecture. The Kubus was awarded on the recommendation of a jury made up of Nathalie de Vries (chair), Steven Nobel, Ton Idsinga, Wienke Bodewes, Willem Hein Schenk and Willem Jan Neutelings. The presentation ceremony will take place on 3 November in Amsterdam. Extract from the jury report The jury concluded that Van Berkel and Bos, together with their UNStudio team, are more than deserved winners of the 2016 BNA Kubus. 'No one controls the creative and technical process better than UNStudio. They prove that in-depth research pays off, as does network-driven collaboration with professionals in the fields of architecture, infrastructure and urban development. The cutting-edge nature and absolute craftsmanship of their body of work makes it both exemplary and innovative.' High quality, iconic buildings and international appeal The jury’s decision was based on three criteria: excellent craftsmanship, a recognisable and innovative body of work, and a relevant contribution to the profession. From the time UNStudio was established in 1988, Van Berkel and Bos have been building up an impressive body of work, according to the jury. Their work is always of high quality, the buildings are iconic and have international appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spirit of Architecture
    The SpiriT of ArchiTec Ture World Architecture dAy oct 8 2012 MuMbAi Renaissance Hotel & Convention Centre “ARCHITECTS TODAY TEND TO DEPRECIATE ArchiTecTure iS The moST reAliSTic form of ArT. iT iS The ArT THEMSELVES, TO REGARD THEMSELVES AS of building, of creating hAbitable And enjoyAble SpAceS for NO MORE THAN JUST ORDINARY CITIZENS living And Working And plAying; And iT plAyS A role in ShAping WITHOUT THE POWER TO REFORM THE liveS. globAlly, The firST mondAy of ocTober iS celebrated AS future” – Kenzo TaNGE World ArchiTecTure Day. WAd, AS iT iS populArly knoWn, iS being celebrated for The firST Time ever in indiA! White Flag is an imprint for large-format, illustrated RAK Ceramics is a 1$ billion global conglomerate that books on India, specializing in architecture, interior design supplies to over 150 countries and has been officially and décor. The parent company is Sezal Entertainment recognized as the world’s largest ceramic tile & Media India Ltd (SEAM). manufacturer with a global production of 117 million square meters annually. RAK Ceramics offers a WhAT iS SEAM is first of its kind company, which gives 360 degree comprehensive product portfolio comprising over focused media solutions for ‘Architecture & Design’ 8,000 designs in ceramic tiles, Gres Porcellanto and fraternity. It has 4 focus verticals: Publishing, Portals, several models in bathware.RAK Ceramics has earned Events & Videos. distinctions like CMO Asia’s Best Brand and Best WAD? Employer Brand Awards at Singapore, 2012 and has WAd iS A one dAy conference. hoWever, The impAcT iS beyond The dAy. White Flag has a range of titles on its list like retained the SuperBrand title for third consecutive year.
    [Show full text]
  • Type Title Author/Editor Publisher Date/Edition ISBN Category Book
    Type TheTitle Autopoeisis of Architecture: A Author/Editor Publisher Date/Edition ISBN Category Book New Framework for Architecture, Vol. Patrik Schumacher Wiley 2011 9780470772980 Architectural Theory Book Labour,Critical Modernism Work, and Architecture: Charles Jencks Wiley 2007 0470030100 Architectural Theory Book TheorizingCollected Essays a New onAgenda Architecture for and Kenneth Frampton PrincetonPhaidon 2002 0714840807 Architectural Theory Book Architecture: An Anthology of MadelineKate Nesbitt, Gins Ed. and UniversityArchitectural of Press 1996 156898054X Architectural Theory Book MyArchitectural Works and Body Days: A Personal Arakawa Harcourt,Alabama PressBrace, 1979, 2002First 9780817311698 Architectural Theory Book FindingsChronicle and Keepings: Analects for Lewis Mumford Harcourt,Jovanovich Brace, 1975,Edition First 0151640874 Architectural Theory Book an autobiography Lewis Mumford TheJovanovich Monacelli Edition 0151309841 Architectural Theory Book Henry N. Cobb: Words & Works Eeva-LiisaHenry N. Cobb YalePress School of 2018 9781580935142 Architectural Theory Book Exhibiting Architecture: A Paradox? Pelkonen with Architecture, Actar 2015 9781940291598 Architectural Theory Book NumberRethinking 9: TheHappiness Search for the Sigma Aldo Cibic Corraini Edizioni 2010 9788875702656 Architectural Theory Book ArchitectureCode Words 7: Modernity Cecil Balmond ArchitecturalPrestel 2008 9783791340678 Architectural Theory Book ArchitectureUnbound Words 12: Stones Detlef Mertins ArchitecturalAssociation 2011 9781902902890 Architectural
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECTIONS Proceedings of the 26Th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2021)
    PROJECTIONS Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2021) Volume 2 Edited by Anastasia Globa University of Sydney Jeroen van Ameijde The Chinese University of Hong Kong Adam Fingrut The Chinese University of Hong Kong Nayeon Kim Yonsei University Sky Lo Tian Tian Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen) Projections 26th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2021) 29 March – 1 April 2021 School of Architecture The Chinese University of Hong Kong ©2021 All rights reserved and published by The Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), Hong Kong ISBN: 978-988-78917-6-5 Printed in Hong Kong v Foreword The annual CAADRIA (Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia) conference provides an international community of researchers and practitioners with a venue to exchange, to discuss and to publish their latest ideas and accomplishments. The proceedings have two volumes containing the research papers that were accepted for presentation at the Projections – 26th In- ternational CAADRIA Conference, hosted and organised by the Faculty of Archi- tecture at Chinese University of Hong Kong. The papers are also available online at the open access cumulative database CumInCAD {http://papers.cumin- cad.org}. The proceedings are the outcome of an extensive collaborative effort of a team of volunteers and CAADRIA’s international Academic Review Commit- tee. Within the context of continued challenges and restrictions imposed by the ongoing world-wide pandemic, our CAADRIA community have shown its resil- ience and strength. Initial calls for papers in July 2020 resulted in a round number of 400 abstract submissions.
    [Show full text]
  • (Un) Studio-Möbius House / Arnhem Central Station / Mercedes Benz Museum
    UNFOLDING DIAGRAMS AS GENERATIVE DESIGN TOOLS IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PROCESS: UNITED NETWORK (UN) STUDIO-MÖBIUS HOUSE / ARNHEM CENTRAL STATION / MERCEDES BENZ MUSEUM A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY BAŞAK KUYUMCU IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE IN ARCHITECTURE SEPTEMBER 2010 Approval of the thesis: UNFOLDING DIAGRAMS AS GENERATIVE DESIGN TOOLS IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PROCESS: UNITED NETWORK (UN) STUDIO- MÖBIUS HOUSE / ARNHEM CENTRAL STATION / MERCEDES BENZ MUSEUM submitted by BAŞAK KUYUMCU in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture in Architecture Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Canan Özgen _________________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Assoc. Prof. Dr. Güven Arif Sargın _________________ Head of Department, Architecture Assoc. Prof. Dr. Selahattin Önür _________________ Supervisor, Architecture Dept., METU Examining Committee Members Inst. Dr. Haluk Zelef _________________ Architecture Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Selahattin Önür _________________ Architecture Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mine Özkar _________________ Architecture Dept., METU Assist. Prof. Dr. Fehmi Doğan _________________ Architecture Dept., İzmir Institute of Technology Dr. Architect Kerem Yazgan _________________ Date: 13.09.2010 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Signature : iii ABSTRACT UNFOLDING DIAGRAMS AS GENERATIVE DESIGN TOOLS IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PROCESS: UNITED NETWORK (UN) STUDIO- MÖBIUS HOUSE / ARNHEM CENTRAL STATION / MERCEDES BENZ MUSEUM Kuyumcu, Başak M.Arch., Department of Architecture Supervisor: Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDREA ZITTEL Lives and Works in Joshua Tree, CA EDUCATION
    ANDREA ZITTEL Lives and works in Joshua Tree, CA EDUCATION 1990 MFA Sculpture, Rhode Island School of Design, Providence, RI 1988 BFA (Hons.) Painting/Sculpture, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA SOLO AND TWO PERSON EXHIBITIONS 2017 Palm Springs Art Museum, Architecture and Design Center, Palm Springs, CA, "On the Grid: a look at settlement patterns in the high desert," March 11 - May 22 2016 Andrea Rosen Gallery, New York, NY, September 9 – October 8 Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, NY, “Human Interest: Portraits from the Whitney’s Collection,” April 27 – February 12, 2017 2015 Sprüth Magers, Berlin, Germany, November 3 – January 9, 2016 Middelheim Museum, Antwerp, Belgium, “Andrea Zittel: The Flat Field Works,” June 13 – September 27 Palm Springs Art Museum, Palm Springs, CA, “Eye On Design: Andrea Zittel's Aggregated Stacks and the Collection of the Palm Springs Art Museum,” March 17 – July 12 2014 Nevada Museum of Art, Reno, NV, August 13 Denver Federal Center, Lakewood, CO, “Planar Pavilion”, opened September, permanent installation Sadie Coles HQ, London, England, March 25 – May 31 2013 Friedrich Petzel Gallery, New York, NY, “Allan McCollum: Plaster Surrogates Colored and Organized by Andrea Zittel,” September 6 – October 19 Massimo de Carlo, Milan, Italy, “How to Live?” June 1 – July 20 2012 Andrea Rosen Gallery, New York, NY, “Fluid Panel State,” September 13 – October 27 2011 Regen Projects, Los Angeles, CA, September 16 – October 29 Magasin 3, Stockholm, Sweden, “Lay of My Land,” September 9 – December 11 Travels
    [Show full text]