Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction a b, Aaron J. Small, MD, MSCE , Richard A. Kozarek, MD * KEYWORDS Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction Biliary Pancreatic Sphincterotomy Endoscopic therapy EPISOD trial Patient selection KEY POINTS Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a benign, acalculous disease that can result in biliary or pancreatic obstructive symptoms. Chronic, unrelenting epigastric or right upper quadrant pain is not caused by SOD. It is difficult, if not impossible, to diagnose SOD in patients with an intact gallbladder. Modified Milwaukee classification is the most relevant classification system in clinical practice. The classification and response to sphincterotomy of biliary SOD I to III has been defined by randomized controlled trials, whereas pancreatic SOD classification has not. Initial evaluation starts with history taking, biochemistries, and noninvasive imaging before proceeding with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincter of Oddi manometry, if necessary. Response to sphincterotomy depends largely on the type of disease, with excellent response to type I and variable results with type II. Recent level I evidence suggests no role for therapeutic ERCP for type III SOD, which has no better response to treatment than a sham sphincterotomy. INTRODUCTION Biliary dyskinesia has been known by a number of pseudonyms, including but not limited to ampullary spasm, papillary stenosis, and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). The latter name disregards Glisson’s 1681 description of the bit of muscle Disclosure statement: Dr A.J. Small has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose; Dr R.A. Kozarek (Virginia Mason Medical Center) received support from the National Institutes of Health (DK074739-07) as one of the investigators in the EPISOD Study. a Division of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, USA; b Division of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, University of Washington, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, USA * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 25 (2015) 749–763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2015.06.009 giendo.theclinics.com 1052-5157/15/$ – see front matter Ó 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 750 Small & Kozarek encompassing the distal bile duct and credits Ruggero Oddi, a fourth year medical student at the University of Perugia, Italy, with its description in 1887 and its consequent dysfunction.1 What neither Glisson nor Oddi envisioned, however, was the controversy surrounding a 6- to 15-mm fragment of smooth muscle that Boyden has divided into three distinct histologic segments to include the sphincter ampullae.2 Like a theologic trinity, Oddi’s sphincter, therefore, has evolved into three. Clinical signs and symptoms accordingly are predicated on which of the subsphincters becomes inflamed, irritated, spastic, patulous, or hormonally belligerent.3 The senior author first wrote this more than 20 years ago.3 What has happened in the subsequent 2 decades that has made the authors rethink their approach to possible sphincter dysfunction? The entire paradigm of SOD may currently be unraveling with the questionable utility of effective endoscopic therapies for certain subtypes of SOD. The decision to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy for SOD is complex and involves several factors, such as patient characteristics, classifica- tion of the disease, local expertise, and potential predictors of response to therapy. When considering therapy for SOD, it is essential to partake in shared decision making with patients and consider each of these variables in order to develop the best approach for each patient having symptoms potentially attributable to the pancreaticobiliary sphincters. This article reviews the current definition of SOD and the various factors to consider before embarking on endoscopic therapy for SOD in light of recent evidence. DEFINING SPHINCTER OF ODDI DYSFUNCTION The sphincter of Oddi (SO) serves as the dynamic gatekeeper for pancreaticobiliary endoscopists as a cylindrical anatomic structure composed of 3 sphincters of smooth muscle fibers that surround the distal common bile duct (CBD), main pancreatic duct, and the ampulla of Vater (Fig. 1).4–6 Given its anatomic position surrounding the intra- mural portion of the CBD and pancreatic ducts, SO contractility directly regulates the (antegrade) flow of bile and pancreatic juices out into the duodenum and prevents (retrograde) reflux of duodenal fluid into the pancreaticobiliary tree. Dysregulation of SO contractility, involving either of the biliary or pancreatic portions of the sphincter or both, can result in an impedance of flow, alleged to be responsible for biliary colic as well as a source for acute, relapsing pancreatitis. Inflammation and fibrosis at the papillary orifice may also contribute to sphincter spasm or stenosis.7 The resultant clinical syndrome of this dyskinetic or stenotic sphincter is characterized as SOD. Diagnosis is often made after excluding overt stone disease and other structural causes for pancreatic or biliary pain, including ductal stenosis or stones. A variety of other terms, including papillary stenosis, sclerosing papillitis, biliary spasms, biliary dyskinesia, and postcholecystectomy pain syndrome, have been linked to SOD, further adding to the confusion of this disease. SOD remains a controversial clinical entity that is multifactorial and may present with complex symptoms. Pathogenesis The cause of SOD is not well understood. It is categorized as a benign, acalculous obstructive disorder at the level of the SO.8 There are several proposed causes. One is the formation of a stenosis at the ampulla from passage of a gallstone or gravel over an extended time period. A second possibility is attributed to SO hypertension either caused by a congenital hypertrophic sphincter or an overly responsive smooth muscle contraction of the sphincter to neuronal or hormonal stimuli. Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction 751 Fig. 1. SO anatomy. (From Elmunzer BJ, Elta GH. Biliary tract motor function and dysfunc- tion. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ, editors. Sleisenger and Fordtran’s gastrointes- tinal and liver disease: pathophysiology/diagnosis/management. 9th edition. (PA): Saunders Elsevier; 2010. p. 1068; with permission.) Epidemiology The prevalence of SOD is difficult to ascertain given that the diagnosis is one of exclu- sion and based on a high level of suspicion, often after response to a biliary and/or pancreatic sphincterotomy. Up to 1.5% of the US population report symptoms consis- tent with SOD based on survey data, with a 3-fold female predilection.9 It is estimated that 10% to 20% of patients who undergo cholecystectomy have subsequent recur- rent or residual upper abdominal pain; these patients may have SOD.10–13 Estimates for pancreatic SOD are limited to small cohort studies with 33% to 40% of idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis suspected to be from SOD.14 Classification of Sphincter of Oddi There have been several reported classification schemes of SOD in an effort to objectify the diagnosis. The most widely adopted is the Milwaukee classification scheme pro- posed by Hogan and Geenen.15 In this scheme, SOD is classified into biliary types I, II, and III based on upper abdominal symptoms, biochemical abnormalities, and radio- graphic results (Table 1).6,15 Subsequently, this classification was broadened to include patients with pancreatic-type pain and relapsing pancreatitis (by single-center expert opinion but never validated in randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). Type I is character- ized by (1) dilated CBD or main pancreatic ducts, with some variations in the cutoffs in what is considered a dilated duct (note that the classification fails to consider the degree of bile dilation before and after cholecystectomy); (2) greater than a 1.5- to 2.0-fold elevation in liver-associated enzymes (aminotransferases or alkaline phosphatase levels) or pancreatic enzymes (amylase or lipase) on at least 2 occasions during epi- sodes of pain; and (3) typical, episodic biliary, or pancreatic pain. Type II is suspected when 2 of the 3 aforementioned criteria are present. Finally, type III has been defined by 752 Small & Kozarek Table 1 Modified Milwaukee classification scheme Classification Diagnostic Criteria A. Biliary SOD Type 1 1. Biliary-type pain 2. Elevated ALT, AST, AP more than 1.5–2.0 times the upper limit of normal on at least 2 or more occasions 3.Bile duct diameter 10 mm Type 2 Biliary-type pain with either B or C in the aforementioned criteria Type 3 Biliary-type pain only with no other abnormalities B. Pancreatic SOD Type 1 1. Pancreatic-type pain 2. Elevated serum amylase or lipase more than 1.5–2.0 times the upper limit of normal on at least 2 or more occasions 3. Pancreatic duct diameter 6 mm in the head and 5 mm in the body Type 2 Pancreatic-type pain with either B or C in the aforementioned criteria Type 3 Pancreatic-type pain only with no other abnormalities Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase. intense biliary or pancreatic-type pain alone with no evidence of laboratory or radio- graphic abnormalities during episodes of pain or at baseline. Despite these criteria, some remain skeptical of the diagnosis, contending that type I is rather a consequence
Recommended publications
  • Bridgewater Review Bridgewater ~View June 2000
    FROM THE BRIDGEWATER STATE COllEGE PERMANENT COllECTION BreakingUp--West River, c. 1925 Aldro T. Hibbard (Falmouth, Mass., 1886-Rockport, Mass., 1972) Oil on canvas, 30" x 36" Winter scenes exemplified by this large painting are among the most loved and admired themes ofAldro Hibbard's works. Done in the Impressionist style that was popular in America in the early twentieth century, this landscape was mostly painted on-site in the West River Valley ofVermont, near the artist's home. In searching out his Hibbard learned his style at the Hibbard found his subject matter not subject matter in the frozen woods and vil­ Massachusetts Normal Art School (now only in Vermont, but in the landscapes lages, Hibbard would load a sled with up to the Massachusetts College ofArt) and the tllroughout New England and Canada. 50 pounds ofpaint supplies and equipment. School ofthe Museum ofFine Arts, where Summers were spent on either Cape Cod or Impressionists were known for experienc­ he studied with such well-known painters as Cape Ann, where he founded and directed ing some difficult working conditions in Frank Benson, Phillip 1. Hale, and Edmund the Rockport School of Drawing and painting outdoors, but only Hibbard regu­ Tarbell (who is represented by a painting Painting that was later named for him. The larly endured the icy cold for his art. Here and a pastel in the College's Permanent Permanent CoUection includes anotller the painting done on-site is revealed in the Collection). The Museum School trained a work by Hibbard, a small painting titled convincing portrayal ofthe midday light of generation ofpainters in the prevailing Cape Cod Marshes, Provincetown.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Syndromic Diarrhea/Tricho-Hepato-Enteric Syndrome: a Review of the Literature
    ISSN 2186-3644 Online ISSN 2186-361X IRDR Intractable & Rare Diseases Research Volume 6, Number 3 August, 2017 www.irdrjournal.com ISSN: 2186-3644 Online ISSN: 2186-361X CODEN: IRDRA3 IRDR Issues/Year: 4 Intractable & Rare Diseases Research Language: English Publisher: IACMHR Co., Ltd. Intractable & Rare Diseases Research is one of a series of peer-reviewed journals of the International Research and Cooperation Association for Bio & Socio-Sciences Advancement (IRCA- BSSA) Group and is published quarterly by the International Advancement Center for Medicine & Health Research Co., Ltd. (IACMHR Co., Ltd.) and supported by the IRCA-BSSA, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, and Shandong Rare Disease Association. Intractable & Rare Diseases Research devotes to publishing the latest and most significant research in intractable and rare diseases. Articles cover all aspects of intractable and rare diseases research such as molecular biology, genetics, clinical diagnosis, prevention and treatment, epidemiology, health economics, health management, medical care system, and social science in order to encourage cooperation and exchange among scientists and clinical researchers. Intractable & Rare Diseases Research publishes Original Articles, Brief Reports, Reviews, Policy Forum articles, Case Reports, News, and Letters on all aspects of the field of intractable and rare diseases research. All contributions should seek to promote international collaboration. IRCA-BSSA Group Journals ISSN: 1881-7815 ISSN: 1881-7831 ISSN: 2186-3644 Online ISSN: 1881-7823 Online ISSN: 1881-784X Online ISSN: 2186-361X CODEN: BTIRCZ CODEN: DDTRBX CODEN: IRDRA3 Issues/Year: 6 Issues/Year: 6 Issues/Year: 4 Language: English Language: English Language: English Publisher: IACMHR Co., Ltd. Publisher: IACMHR Co., Ltd. Publisher: IACMHR Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Concepts of Sphincter of Oddi Pancreatic Dysfunction N. B
    Modern concepts of sphincter of Oddi pancreatic dysfunction 1N. B. Gubergrits, 1N. V. Byelyayeva, 1A. Y. Klochkov, 1G. M. Lukashevich, 2V. S. Rakhmetova, 1P. G. Fomenko, 1A. V. Yurjeva, 1L. A. Yaroshenko 1Donetsk National Medical University, Ukraine 2Medical University Astana, Kazakhstan Key words: sphincter of Oddi, anatomy, dysfunction, Rome recommendations IV, diagnosis, treatment Clinical medicine is not a fixed or stable discipline. The clinics allows both variants of forms and variants of thought. M.P. Konchalovsky [4] The concepts of functional disorders of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) of the pancreatic type are very fuzzy and contradictory. Suffice it to say that even in modern Rome IV recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of functional gastroenterological disorders are not defined and information on the epidemiology of functional disorders of pancreatic SO are not presented [12]. We assume that in practice in the past years it was precisely this disorder that was designated by the terms ―dyspancreatism‖ and/or ―reactive pancreatitis.‖ Now these terms have rightly disappeared from gastroenterological practice, giving way to a more modern one. Doctors made such diagnoses when there was a clinic of more or less pronounced pancreatitis, which did not find objective laboratory and instrumental confirmation. By the way, neither the former nor the modern terms are included in ICD-10, where only a spasm of SO with the code K 83.4 is mentioned. Turn to anatomy and history. In the terminal parts of the common bile duct, the main pancreatic and in the area of their confluence (hepato-pancreatic ampoule) there is a complex smooth muscle structure consisting of numerous thin fibers that are arranged in different directions relative to the axis of the ducts — in a circular, longitudinal and oblique — its structure, function and its regulation, since the seventeenth century, are carefully studied, and yet they are not fully understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (Sod)
    SPHINCTER OF ODDI DYSFUNCTION (SOD) THE ENDOSCOPE IS MIGHTIER THAN THE BLADE: PLOWING THROUGH (SOD) Medical Grand Rounds June 5, 1997 J. Steven Burdick, MD The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 2 FORWARD The Sphincter of Oddi is a complex series of muscle bundles which regulates the flow of 2-3 liters of bile and pancreatic fluids per day. Commonly, conditions arise in which the normal progression of these fluids are impaired due to an outflow obstruction. This obstruction may be anatomically fixed "papillary stenosis" or spasmodic "biliary dyskinesia". Overlap of these disease entities, inconsistent definitions, and different techniques of delineation among investigators led to the proliferation of terms used with reference to Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction Other terms included under Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction include biliary dyskinesia, post cholecystectomy syndrome, papillary stenosis, and papillitis. Diagnostically, the inability to pass a 3 mm Blake's choledochoprobe at open cholecystectomy was eventually replaced with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and manometric pressure recording instruments. Few today would argue that the patient who suffers with pain and evidence of an obstructed bile duct with associated biliary dilation and abnormal liver function tests are definitively abnormal. However, the intermittent pain syndrome with variable findings of abnormal liver function tests, partial obstruction on cholangiogram or nuclear medicine studies, is more dubious. These intermittent findings have been felt secondary to spasm and have been difficult to reproduce manometrically. Additionally, these patients may have concomitant disorders of irritable bowel syndrome and, thus, the therapy is less consistent. Investigators note the similarities of intermittent spasm with prinzmetal's angina or esophageal spasm, while others remain unconvinced of its reproducibility or science.
    [Show full text]
  • Diapositiva 1
    Davide Zaffe Great Anatomists 1400-1900 (Arranged by date of birth) 3rd version BMN Modena Italy Leonicenus translated ancient Greek and Arabic medical texts, and wrote the first scientific paper on syphillis. He was the leader of the Humanistic Medicine, which overcame the Medieval Medicine, and composed the first criticism of the Natural History of Pliny the Elder, pointing out his medical errors. Brasavola, Bembo and, according to some people, Paracelsus were his pupils. (Nicolò da Lonigo) LEONICENUS 1428 Lonigo VI (I) - 1524 Ferrara (I) As a successful artist, Leonardo dissected several human corpses to observe and paint the anatomical features. Leonardo’ anatomical drawings include studies on the skeleton and muscles, prefiguring the modern science of biomechanics, the vascular system, the internal and sex organs, also making the first scientific draws of a fetus in utero. Leonardo made more than 200 drawings and prepared to publish a theoretical work on anatomy, but the book Treatise on painting was published only in 1680. LEONARDO da Vinci 1452 Vinci FI (I) - 1519 Cloux (F) Sylvius was a very popular teacher of anatomy. His most distinguished student was Andreas Vesalius, but later Sylvius contrasted the innovative and revolutionary view of the Anatomy of Vesalius’ Fabrica. Sylvius gave a name to the muscles, previously referred only by numbers. Sylvius described satisfactory the sphenoid bone and the vertebrae, but wrongly the sternum. Sylvius introduced a number of anatomical terms that have persisted, such as crural, cystic, gastric, popliteal, iliac, and mesentery. Jacques (Dubois) SYLVIUS 1478 Loeuilly (F) - 1555 Paris (F) 1 Pupil of Leonicenus, Brasavola was a leading exponent of the Ferrara Medical School, tanks to own great anatomical knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Literature on Clinical Pancreatology
    REVIEW OF LITERATURE ON CLINICAL PANCREATOLOGY Scientific literature made available in 2009 Selected and edited by Åke Andrén-Sandberg & Omid Azodi From the Department of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, S-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden REVIEWER’S PREFACE (and SEARCH ALGORITM) The scientific literature also in small medical subjects like pancreatology is today enormous – and it is not possible to keep updated unless making very strong and focused efforts. The present review is an attempt to make it easier for clinical pancreatologists to keep updated. From the beginning the consecutive quarterly reviews were an effort to make the reviewers updated, but hopefully it can be used also of others with the same interest, i.e. clinical pancreatology. However, it will still be a personal review, which means that the selection of presented articles have been up to the reviewers, and other authors should probably have made at least some other choises. There must be made some limitations, otherwise a review in this form should not be possible to write due to lack of time and lack of brain capacity, and probably not possible to read either. Regarding the limitations, first of all almost all of the articles have been read in their full length, but the writing here is based on their abstracts for practical reasons. This is also in line with the aim of the review: not to report all what has been published, but rather to give an introductional sample that hopefully will make the reader eager to read the whole article or articles: “a tast of pancreatology in 2009”.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Ford Health System Publication List – January 2020
    Henry Ford Health System Publication List – January 2020 This bibliography aims to recognize the scholarly activity and provide ease of access to journal articles, meeting abstracts, book chapters, books and other works published by Henry Ford Health System personnel. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar during the month, and then imported into EndNote for formatting. There are 128 unique citations listed this month; articles are listed first, followed by conference abstracts and books. Because of various limitations, this does not represent an exhaustive list of all published works by Henry Ford Health System authors. Click the “Full Text” link to view the articles to which Sladen Library provides access. If the full-text of the article is not available, you may request it through ILLiad by clicking on “Request Article,” or calling us at (313) 916-2550. If you would like to be added to the monthly email distribution list to automatically receive a PDF of this bibliography, or you have any questions or comments, please contact [email protected]. If your published work has been missed, please use this form to notify us for inclusion on next month’s list. All articles and abstracts listed here are deposited into Scholarly Commons, the HFHS institutional repository. Articles Allergy and Immunology Sitarik A, Havstad S, Kim H, Zoratti EM, Ownby D, Johnson CC, and Wegienka G. Racial Disparities in Allergic Outcomes Persist to Age 10 Years in Black and White Children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020; Epub ahead of print. PMID: 31945477. Full Text Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA; .
    [Show full text]
  • Article Full Text
    Copyright © 1980 Ohio Acad. Sci. 0030-0950/80/0005-0195 $2.00/0 HIGHLIGHTS OF A CAREER IN MEDICAL SCIENCE1- 2 LIBERATO JOHN A. DiDIO, Dean of Graduate School, Medical College of Ohio at Toledo, Caller Service 10008, Toledo, OH 43699 OHIO J. SCI. 80(5): 195, 1980 In thinking about this presentation, I anatomist and to devote my life to dis- decided to share with you the highlights assembling, studying, and analyzing one of my career as a scientist, which on this of Nature's masterpieces. My lifelong ceremonious occasion may be considered learning has led me to an appreciation, the confessions of an Academy President, highlighted by a continuing sense of and to dedicate the presentation espe- wonder, of the miracle of life and the cially to the young scientists of Ohio. human body. From the practical stand- I should alert you, however, that as a point, my decision to be an anatomist physician who is concerned with pre- was to serve mankind through my work ventive medicine, I will not deliver a as a scientist and educator. I later purely serious speech. Science is serious, came to realize that I recreated in my but not necessarily sad—as you shall own life the same situation that existed see, I have thoroughly enjoyed my life at the creation of the world. When it as a scientist. was asserted that God must have been a Trained as a surgeon, early in my surgeon, as only through surgery could career I made the decision to become an He first perform the costectomy in Adam to create Eve, an anatomist pro- Manuscript received 28 June 1980 and in re- tested, saying that God first had to know vised form 8 July 1980 (#80-36).
    [Show full text]