DOCSLIB.ORG

AN OVERVIEW of FERAL and SEMI – FERAL POPULATIONS in GREECE Hello, I Am Nikos Kostaras and I Am a Member of the NGO AMALTHEIA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AN OVERVIEW of FERAL and SEMI – FERAL POPULATIONS in GREECE Hello, I Am Nikos Kostaras and I Am a Member of the NGO AMALTHEIA AN OVERVIEW OF FERAL AND SEMI – FERAL POPULATIONS IN GREECE Hello, I am Nikos Kostaras and I am a member of the NGO AMALTHEIA. My presentation has to do with the Greek feral and semi-feral populations in general. A small presentation of Amaltheia and its purpose. A description of the Greek landscape and its peculiarities compared to the rest of Europe. Evolution of indigenous breeds of farm animals in Greece. Current situation Management, Husbandry and Legal Implications Feral and Semi-Feral breeds in Greece. AMALTHEIA AMALTHEIA is a Greek NGO association of natural persons and legal bodies, whose main purpose is to record, study, protect and Preserve all breeds of Indigenous farm and companion Animals. Amaltheia was created in 2006 with the aid of SAVE Foundation. Today members of AMALTHEIA are 9 legal bodies and many individuals. LANDSCAPE Greece consists of a mountainous, peninsular mainland expanding out into the Mediterranean Sea at the southern end of the Balkans . Although Greece is a small country compared to other European countries it has the 10th longest coastline in the world with14, 880 km (9,246 mi). Its total wold is 130,800 km 2 and its land boundary is 1,160 km (721 mi). Eighty percent of Greece consists of mountains or hills, making the country one of the most mountainous in Europe. Mount Olympus , the highest in the country rises 2,917 m (9,570 ft) above sea level. Western Greece contains a number of lakes and wetlands and is dominated by the Pindus mountain range. The Pindus, a continuation of the Dinaric Alps , reaches an elevation of 2,637 m (8,652 ft). Pindus is characterized by its high, steep peaks, often dissected by numerous canyons and a variety of other landscapes. The Vikos Gorge , part of the Vikos-Aoos National Park in the Pindus range, is listed by the Guinness book of World Records as the deepest gorge in the world Northeastern Greece features another high-altitude mountain range, the Rhodope range, spreading across the region of East Macedonia and Thrace ; this area is covered with vast, thick, ancient forests. Extensive plains are primarily located in the regions of Thessaly , Central Macedonia and Thrace . They constitute key economic regions as they are among the few arable places in the country. The islands are another characteristic of Greece’s morphology and an integral part of the country’s culture and tradition. Greek sovereign land includes between 1,200 and 6,000, islands and islets depending on the definition scattered in the Aegean and Ionian Seas, of which only 227 islands are inhabited. This is a truly unique phenomenon for the European continent. The climate of Greece is primarily Mediterranean , featuring mild, wet winters and hot, dry summers. This climate occurs at all coastal locations. The Pindus mountain range strongly affects the climate of the country, as areas to the west of the range are considerably wetter on average than the areas lying to the east of the range The mountainous areas of Northwestern Greece as in the mountainous central parts of Peloponnese feature an Alpine climate with heavy snowfalls. The inland parts of northern Greece, in Central Macedonia and East Macedonia and Thrace feature a temperate climate with cold, damp winters and hot, dry summers with frequent thunderstorms. Snowfalls occur every year in the mountains and northern areas, and brief snowfalls are not unknown even in low-lying southern areas, such as Athens. Phytogeographically , Greece belongs to the Boreal Kingdom and is shared between the East Mediterranean province of the Mediterranean Region and the Illyrian province of the Circumboreal Region . According to the World Wide Fund for Nature and the European Environment Agency , the territory of Greece can be subdivided into six ecoregions : the Illyrian deciduous forests , Pindus Mountains mixed forests , Balkan mixed forests , Rhodope mountain mixed forests, Aegean and Western Turkey sclerophyllous and mixed forests and Crete Mediterranean forests. It is obvious to everyone that Greece is not an average country compared to the rest of Europe. It consists of a continuous change in landscape and has a vast range in altitude, temperature, humidity etc. This peculiarity of the Greek land is challenging and demanding for all life forms that inhabit the region. All forms of life have to adapt to this special environment in order to survive. EVOLUTION Due to environmental and climatic conditions, most of the mountainous and island areas have a great flora variety but a limited flora production. This phenomenon of low productivity favors small animal size. This trend is not new. Fossils found in various places around Greece dating back to the last ice age revealed dwarf elephants, rhinos, hippopotamus and other animals. One of the visible characteristics of most Greek breeds is the small size because large animals cannot survive with such a limited feed source. Other characteristics dictated by the environment when comparing Greek to many foreign breeds are: The ability to survive on minimal feed and water rations, having adapted perfectly to this hard environment. Most Greek breeds need limited or no stabling facilities. These indigenous breeds are known to withstand extreme temperature conditions ranging from -15C in the winter to +40C in the summer. Many of these breeds live outdoors all year round even if stabling is offered to them. Resistance to parasites and diseases is another characteristic of our indigenous breeds. Evolution has equipped the Greek breeds to resist many problems caused by parasites, skin diseases, sun induced problems (photosensitivity) etc. The ability to move with ease in rough, stony mountainous terrain. This is impossible for many foreign farm breeds. Due to their adaptation to the environment Greek breeds have evolved another quality which is longer productive life. All the above, small size, resistance to diseases and the ease to live in these specific environmental conditions have resulted in a longer productive life compared to other imported breeds. One might say that, small sized animals have smaller produce than larger animals. This is true, large animals do produce more. Most Greek breeds produce less but the quality of their produce is greater in terms of relish, nutritional value and percentage of ingredients. CURRENT SITUATION A mixture of terrestrial environment, legal status and political choices has led to the current situation. In the 50s meat was scarce; herds were family owned, usually in small numbers but managed well for maximum produce. During the 60s a huge migration trend swept the country. Poverty forced people to migrate to big cities and foreign countries. This resulted in the abandonment of rural arias and consequently farm activities. From the 70s and 80s onwards many remaining farmers relied mostly on subsidies by the state. Their aim was to create big herds in order to apply for more subsidies. Produce became secondary, management was little or non existent. Today with the subsidy policy ending, the old generation of farmers retiring, and the young people preferring a city life, flocks and herds are neglected or slaughtered. The death of an aged farmer, in many cases results in abandonment of his flock, which roams free on the mountains. This downfall of animal husbandry has many causes. The existing legal framework does not work in favor of the farmers. Farmers have to overcome huge obstacles. The problem begins since in Greece the regulation concerning the slaughter of animals are very strict. This results in the existence of a small number of slaughter houses functioning around Greece. Consequently, a farmer living on an island with no slaughter house in theory has to transfer his animals to another island or the mainland in order to slaughter them. It is obvious that this farmer is faced with the dilemma to go bankrupt or be illegal and survive economically. The same applies for dairy products. The law forbids the farmer of making his own cheese depriving him from selling his products. The farmer can only sell his milk to wholesalers at a no profitable price. HUSBANDRY Feral populations in Greece were never many. In older eras feral populations were mostly horses that roamed free in areas where humans did not exploit. These hoses were old horses that could no longer offer their services or horses with health problems. These animals formed groups and reproduced forming herds. These populations were used as a pool where farmers could obtain new stock for their farm activities. Today feral populations of farm animals in National Parks are subjects to the park’s authority. The parks authority is theoretically responsible for these populations but due to the lack of resources (human, equipment or financial) no real management is applied. Other feral populations usually live in state regions where they can avoid contact with humans. These areas are usually sterile, non-economically exploitable areas (eg. wetlands close to the sea) or areas where people can not dwell (eg. mountaintops). Usually animals in this second category are left in peace as long as there is no conflict with humans. Semi-feral populations on the other hand are in a different status and can be found in numerous places in Greece. Semi-Feral Husbandry is an ancient tradition in Greece. A typical scenario has evolved exploiting a feature of the Greek landscape. Since Greece has so many inhabited islands, a farmer may move his herd on an island that is close to his residence. Islands provide a perfect barrier and animals can roam free without the worry of escaping or damaging foreign property. The farmer’s only obligation is to provide water and maybe small amounts of supplementary feed in hard times. For herds that turn wild (usually in cases where natural water exists on the island and the animals are not dependent on the farmer) caching proves difficult and is usually done by shooting, setting traps or with the aid of dogs and long crooks, as seen here on the island of Samothrace.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forest for All Forever
    Centralized National Risk Assessment for Romania FSC-CNRA-RO V1-0 EN FSC-CNRA-RO V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ROMANIA 2017 – 1 of 122 – Title: Centralized National Risk Assessment for Romania Document reference FSC-CNRA-RO V1-0 EN code: Approval body: FSC International Center: Policy and Standards Unit Date of approval: 20 September 2017 Contact for comments: FSC International Center - Policy and Standards Unit - Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 5 53113 Bonn, Germany +49-(0)228-36766-0 +49-(0)228-36766-30 [email protected] © 2017 Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher. Printed copies of this document are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy on the FSC website (ic.fsc.org) to ensure you are referring to the latest version. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non- government organization established to support environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests. FSC’s vision is that the world’s forests meet the social, ecological, and economic rights and needs of the present generation without compromising those of future generations. FSC-CNRA-RO V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ROMANIA 2017 – 2 of 122 – Contents Risk assessments that have been finalized for Romania ........................................... 4 Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Romania ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Land Use on Biodiversity: Development of Spatially Differentiated Global Assessment Methodologies for Life Cycle Assessment
    DISS. ETH NO. xx Impacts of land use on biodiversity: development of spatially differentiated global assessment methodologies for life cycle assessment A dissertation submitted to ETH ZURICH for the degree of Doctor of Sciences presented by LAURA SIMONE DE BAAN Master of Sciences ETH born January 23, 1981 citizen of Steinmaur (ZH), Switzerland accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Stefanie Hellweg, examiner Prof. Dr. Thomas Koellner, co-examiner Dr. Llorenç Milà i Canals, co-examiner 2013 In Gedenken an Frans Remarks This thesis is a cumulative thesis and consists of five research papers, which were written by several authors. The chapters Introduction and Concluding Remarks were written by myself. For the sake of consistency, I use the personal pronoun ‘we’ throughout this thesis, even in the chapters Introduction and Concluding Remarks. Summary Summary Today, one third of the Earth’s land surface is used for agricultural purposes, which has led to massive changes in global ecosystems. Land use is one of the main current and projected future drivers of biodiversity loss. Because many agricultural commodities are traded globally, their production often affects multiple regions. Therefore, methodologies with global coverage are needed to analyze the effects of land use on biodiversity. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a tool that assesses environmental impacts over the entire life cycle of products, from the extraction of resources to production, use, and disposal. Although LCA aims to provide information about all relevant environmental impacts, prior to this Ph.D. project, globally applicable methods for capturing the effects of land use on biodiversity did not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Biophysical Sustainability of Food Systems in a Global and Interconnected World
    Biophysical Sustainability of Food Systems in a Global and Interconnected World Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of “DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY” by Dor Fridman Submitted to the Senate of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev 53/32/2/ Beer-Sheva Biophysical Sustainability of Food Systems in a Global and Interconnected World Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of “DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY” by Dor Fridman Submitted to the Senate of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Approved by the advisor Approved by the Dean of the Kreitman School of Advanced Graduate Studies 32/2/ 53/32/2/ Beer-Sheva This work was carried out under the supervision of Prof. Meidad Kissinger In the Department for Geography and Environmental Development Faculty of Social Sciences Research-Student’s Affidavit when Submitting the Doctoral Thesis for Judgment I Dor Fridman, whose signature appears below, hereby declare that (Please mark the appropriate statements): V I have written this Thesis by myself, except for the help and guidance offered by my Thesis Advisors. V The scientific materials included in this Thesis are products of my own research, culled from the period during which I was a research student. ___ This Thesis incorporates research materials produced in cooperation with others, excluding the technical help commonly received during experimental work. Therefore, I am attaching another affidavit stating the contributions made by myself and the other participants in this research, which has been approved by them and submitted with their approval. Date: 18/2/20 Student’s name: Dor Fridman Signature: Table of contents Table of contents v Acknowledgements vii List of figures viii List of tables ix List of equations x Abstract xi 1.
    [Show full text]
  • TANAP Project Biodiversity Offset Strategy
    October 2017 TRANS-ANATOLIAN NATURAL GAS PIPELINE (TANAP) PROJECT Biodiversity Offset Strategy Report Number 1786851/9059 REPORT TANAP - BIODIVERSITY OFFSET STRATEGY Executive Summary The Trans-Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline (TANAP) Project is part of the Southern Gas Corridor, which aims to transport the Azeri Natural Gas from Shaz Deniz 2 Gas Field and other fields in the South Caspian Sea to Turkey and Europe. The TANAP Project crosses all of Turkey, from the Georgian border in the east to the Greek border in the west. TANAP is committed to managing the potential effects of the Project on biodiversity by implementing the biodiversity mitigation hierarchy (i.e. avoiding, minimizing, rehabilitating and offsetting). The first three steps of the mitigation hierarchy have been considered by TANAP through the project design, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA), and Biodiversity Action Planning (BAP) processes. However, the calculation of net habitat losses, net gain and the identification of offset measures to compensate the residual impacts were not conducted. This report constitutes the Biodiversity Offset Strategy for the TANAP Project, with the purpose of providing a practical and achievable offset scheme for TANAP and creating a framework to direct actions undertaken to offset the residual effects of the Project after the first three steps of the mitigation hierarchy have been implemented. The Biodiversity Offset Strategy for the TANAP Project was developed in accordance to the requirements of the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) Performance Requirement 6 (PR6) and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standard 6 (PS6) “Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources”.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Sea Level Rise Mediated by Climate Change 7 8 9 10 Shaily Menon ● Jorge Soberón ● Xingong Li ● A
    The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com Biodiversity and Conservation Menon et al. 1 Volume 19, Number 6, 1599-1609, DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9790-4 1 2 3 4 5 Preliminary global assessment of biodiversity consequences 6 of sea level rise mediated by climate change 7 8 9 10 Shaily Menon ● Jorge Soberón ● Xingong Li ● A. Townsend Peterson 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 S. Menon 18 Department of Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan 49401-9403 USA, 19 [email protected] 20 21 J. Soberón 22 Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, The University of Kansas, 23 Lawrence, Kansas 66045 USA 24 25 X. Li 26 Department of Geography, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 USA 27 28 A. T. Peterson 29 Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, The University of Kansas, 30 Lawrence, Kansas 66045 USA 31 32 33 34 Corresponding Author: 35 A. Townsend Peterson 36 Tel: (785) 864-3926 37 Fax: (785) 864-5335 38 Email: [email protected] 39 40 The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com | DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9790-4 Menon et al. Biodiversity consequences of sea level rise 2 41 Running Title: Biodiversity consequences of sea level rise 42 43 Preliminary global assessment of biodiversity consequences 44 of sea level rise mediated by climate change 45 46 Shaily Menon ● Jorge Soberón ● Xingong Li ● A. Townsend Peterson 47 48 49 Abstract Considerable attention has focused on the climatic effects of global climate change on 50 biodiversity, but few analyses and no broad assessments have evaluated the effects of sea level 51 rise on biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesy Evr Uvod CZ a I
    Lesy Evropy úvod Terrestrialní (suchozemské) ekoregiony Doc. Ing. Luboš Úradní ček,CSc . Ing. Zdeněk Hrubý Ph.D. Mendelu Brno Czech Republic Inovace biologických a lesnických disciplín pro vyšší konkurenceschopnost (Registra ční číslo CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0018 .) za p řisp ění finan čních prost ředk ů EU a státního rozpo čtu České republiky. Evropa x Eurasie Definice Evropy • Hranice dle Mezinárodní geografické unie: Kuma-Manysh deprese – zlom A (řeka Don – dolní tok) Klima Evropy Oceanické klima AT • Západoevropské klima • V. Britanie, Irsko, Holandsko,Dánsko, Belgie, Luxemburg, Francie, severní Španělsko • mírné přímořské zimy s chladnějším počasím na východě a silnými srážkami (dešti) na západě. • Léta jsou dosti teplá a směrem na sever se stávají chladnějšími. Subkontinentální a kontinentální klima • Východoevropské a středoevropské klima • Bulharsko, Rumunsko, Slovensko, Ukrajina, Slovinsko, ČR, Německo, Estonsko, Litva, Maďarsko, Polsko, Lotyšsko, Švýcarsko a Rakousko • Mírné léto s teplotami obvykle kolem 25 ° C • Zimy jsou celkem chladné, vlhké a mlhavé. • 4 rozdílné sezóny – deštivé jaro a podzim, sníh v horských polohách v průběhu zimi a mírně teplé (někdy horké) léto. Boreální a subarktické klima • Severoevropské klima • Švédsko, Norsko, Finsko, Island, severní část Ruska • mírné, příjemné klima podepřené efektem golfského proudu na Norském pobřeží. Zimy bývají velmi chladné. • Obvykle jižní část severní Evropy má mírnější klima s průměrnou teplotou kolem 0 °C. –SUBBOREÁLNÍ KLIMA • Léta jsou vskutku příjemná, zřídka s teplotou
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives of Development of Forestry in Context of Sustainable Agriculture of the City of Novi Sad1
    PERSPECTIVES OF DEVELOPMENT OF FORESTRY IN CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE OF THE CITY OF NOVI SAD1 Nada Mijajlović2 Abstract Forest ecosystems are crucial in environmental protection and improvement of living conditions in urban and rural communities. Novi Sad, as the capital of AP Vojvodina, has a forest fund and natural forest communities. The aim of this paper is to analyze the state of the forest fund under the administration of the city of Novi Sad. The data considered are related to the forest communities of Fruška Gora and rhytic water ecosystems within the Upper Danube region. Forest plan- tations under the management of state forest farms were considered. Perspec- tives of the development of forestry in the territory of Novi Sad were considered in the context of sustainable development of agriculture. Key words: forest farms, forest fund, ecosystem, sustainable development. Introduction Forest ecosystems are dominant in terms of representation on the Earth’s sur- face, occupying about 4 billion hectares, which is about 30% of the world’s land (Food and Agriculture Organization 2006). The forest life community is diverse of the plant and animal species, as well as fungi and microorganisms. Forests are terrestrial ecosystems that account for 75% of the gross primary production of the Earth’s biosphere and produce 80% of our planet’s biomass. (Pan Yude et al., 2013) Forests are the most complex land-based ecosystems that have a very intense influence on the geological base on which they are rooted. Forests, as plant communities, in the highly active process of photosynthesis, the metabolic exchange of carbon dioxide and oxygen affect the composition of the air in the 1 The work is a part of integrated and interdisciplinary research project no.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversität in Ökobilanzen Weiterentwicklung Und Vergleichende Studien
    Jan Paul Lindner, Horst Fehrenbach, Lisa Winter, Mascha Bischoff, Judith Blömer und Eva Knüpffer Biodiversität in Ökobilanzen Weiterentwicklung und vergleichende Studien BfN-Skripten 575 2020 Biodiversität in Ökobilanzen Weiterentwicklung und vergleichende Studien Jan Paul Lindner Horst Fehrenbach Lisa Winter Mascha Bischoff Judith Blömer Eva Knüpffer Titelbild: Logo der Methode „Biodiversity Impact Assessment“ (M. Haist) Adressen der Autorinnen und Autoren: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jan Paul Lindner Fraunhofer Institut für Bauphysik (IBP) M.A. B.Sc. Eva Knüpffer Abteilung Ganzheitliche Bilanzierung Wankelstraße 5, 70563 Stuttgart E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] Dipl.-Biol. Horst Fehrenbach Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung (ifeu) Dr. Mascha Bischoff Wilckensstr. 3, 69120 Heidelberg M.Sc. Judith Blömer E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Dr. Lisa Winter Technische Universität Berlin Fachgebiet Sustainable Engineering Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin E-Mail: [email protected] Fachbetreuung im BfN: Dr. Lars Berger Fachgebiet I 2.1 „Rechtliche und ökonomische Fragen des Natur- schutzes“ Gefördert durch das Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN) mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMU) (FKZ: 3517 81 1800). Diese Veröffentlichung wird aufgenommen in die Literaturdatenbank „DNL-online“ (www.dnl-online.de). BfN-Skripten sind nicht im Buchhandel erhältlich. Eine pdf-Version dieser Ausgabe kann unter http:// www.bfn.de/skripten.html heruntergeladen werden. Institutioneller Herausgeber: Bundesamt für Naturschutz Konstantinstr. 110 53179 Bonn URL: www.bfn.de Der institutionelle Herausgeber übernimmt keine Gewähr für die Richtigkeit, die Genauigkeit und Vollstän- digkeit der Angaben sowie für die Beachtung privater Rechte Dritter.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Technical Guide - 01
    LIFE TECHNICAL GUIDE - 01 TG01-0.0-Europe Version DRAFT 0.0 - Europe - English (January/2021) TG01-0.0-English Revision: 14/1/2021 Applicability: Europe Version: 0.0 (pilot) LIFE TECHNICAL GUIDE - 01 Measuring the Biodiversity Pressure Index and definition of Page 2 of 44 Biodiversity Minimum Performance OBJECTIVE To establish the minimum performance that each organization/producer must achieve in biodiversity and ecosystem services conservation actions, considering its size and impact. APPLICATION This document applies to organizations and producers who want to contribute to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services and require a support tool to assess and monitor their impacts and their minimum performance for conservation. For LIFE certified organizations in previous versions, this document will become effective from their first follow-up audit after its publication. For other organizations/producers, this document will automatically apply from the publication date. APPROVAL Document approved by the LIFE Institute Board of Directors. Rights reserved by copyright law in Brazil and abroad according to the terms set forth in Brazilian and foreign legislations relevant to the subject. Any kind of reproduction of this document or part of its content requires the express written permission by the LIFE Institute. LIFE Institute Rua Victor Benato, 210 Bosque Zaninelli, UNILIVRE, Pilarzinho CEP: 82120-110 – Curitiba – PR Tel: +55 41 3253-7884 www.institutolife.org 2021 LIFE Institute - All rights reserved. Only documents available
    [Show full text]
  • Using Spatial Metrics to Assess the Efficacy of Biodiversity Conservation
    DOI 10.1515/pesd-2017-0003 PESD, VOL. 11, no. 1, 2017 USING SPATIAL METRICS TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION WITHIN THE ROMANIAN CARPATHIAN CONVENTION AREA Alexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor 1, Liliana Elza Petrişor2 Key words: conservation, CORINE, ecological regions, biogeographical regions, transitional dynamics. Abstract. The alpine region is of crucial importance for the European Union; as a result, the Carpathian Convention aims at its sustainable development. Since sustainability implies also conservation through natural protected areas, aimed at including regions representative for the national biogeographical space, this article aims at assessing the efficiency of conservation. The methodology consisted of using spatial metrics applied to Romanian and European data on the natural protected areas, land cover and use and their transitional dynamics. The findings show a very good coverage of the Alpine biogeographical region (98% included in the Convention area, and 43% of it protected within the Convention area) and of the ecological region of Carpathian montane coniferous forests (88% included in the Convention area, and 42% of it protected within the Convention area). The dominant land cover is represented by forests (63% within the Convention area, and 70% of the total protected area). The main transitional dynamics are deforestation (covering 50% of all changes area within the Convention area and 46% from the changed area within its protected area) and forestations – including afforestation, reforestation and colonization of abandoned agricultural areas by forest vegetation (covering 44% of all changes area within the Convention area and 51% from the changed area within its protected area) during 1990-2000 and deforestation (covering 97% of all changes area within the Convention area and 99% from the changed area within its protected area) during 1990-2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Equations and the Computerprogram Helena for The
    Mapping European Habitats to support the design and implementation of a Pan- European Ecological Network Commissioned by EC-LNV and financed by DWK programme 431 GIS & Remote Sensing 2 Alterra-report 952 Mapping European Habitats to support the design and implementation of a Pan-European Ecological Network The PEENHAB project C.A. Mücher S.M. Hennekens R.G.H. Bunce J.H.J. Schaminée Alterra-report 952 Alterra, Wageningen, 2004 ABSTRACT Mücher, C.A., R.G.H. Bunce, S.M. Hennekens and J.H.J. Schaminée, 2004. Mapping European Habitats to support the design and implementation of a Pan-European Ecological Network; The PEENHAB project. Wageningen, Alterra, Alterra-report 952. 124 pages. 32 figs.; 16 tables.; 36 refs. The overall objective of the PEENHAB project to develop a methodology to identify spatially all major habitats in Europe. The Pan-European Ecological Network (PEEN) anticipates in the development of an indicative map of an ecological network for the whole of Europe. The design of such an indicative map requires information about the spatial distribution of habitats and species in Europe, as well as inside as outside protected areas. Therefore, the development of European habitat maps is a prerequisite for the further development of a pan-European ecological network. The habitat classes as given in Annex I of the Habitats Directive, better known as Natura 2000 habitats, are taken as the reference. On the basis of the Annex I habitat definitions knowledge rules were defined in a flexible manner using graphic models within a GIS environment to optimally combine existing spatial databases (such as land cover, soil data, topographic data and species distribution maps) to identify the spatial distribution of the major European habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Centralized National Risk Assessment for Romania 2017
    Centralized National Risk Assessment for Romania FSC-CNRA-RO V1-0 EN FSC-CNRA-RO V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ROMANIA 2017 Title: Centralized National Risk Assessment for Romania Document reference FSC-CNRA-RO V1-0 EN code: Approval body: FSC International Center: Policy and Standards Unit Date of approval: Contact for comments: FSC International Center - Policy and Standards Unit - Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 5 53113 Bonn, Germany +49-(0)228-36766-0 +49-(0)228-36766-30 [email protected] © 2017 Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher. Printed copies of this document are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy on the FSC website (ic.fsc.org) to ensure you are referring to the latest version. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non- government organization established to support environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests. FSC’s vision is that the world’s forests meet the social, ecological, and economic rights and needs of the present generation without compromising those of future generations. FSC-CNRA-RO V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ROMANIA 2017 Contents Risk assessments that have been finalized for Romania ........................................... 4 Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Romania .................................... 5 Risk assessments ..................................................................................................... 7 Controlled wood category 1: Illegally harvested wood ..........................................
    [Show full text]