The Past and Future of Holocaust Studies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Past and Future of Holocaust Studies Understanding the Holocaust: The Past and Future of Holocaust Studies GREGORY WEEKS Omer Bartov, Germany’s War and the Holocaust: Disputed Histories (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2003), 248 pp., (pb), ISBN 0801486815. Doris L. Bergen, War and Genocide: A Concise History of the Holocaust (Lanham, MD, and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), 280 pp., $17.95 (pb), ISBN 0847696316. Inga Clendinnen, Reading the Holocaust (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 238 pp., $15 (pb), ISBN 0521012694. Deborah´ Dwork, ed., Voices & Views. A History of the Holocaust (New York: Jewish Foundation for the Righteous, 2002), 687 pp., $44.95 (pb), ISBN 0970060211. Cornelia Hecht, Deutsche Juden und Antisemitismus in der Weimarer Republik (Bonn: Dietz 2003), 432 pp., €32.00 (hb), ISBN 3801241378. Dan Stone, Constructing the Holocaust: A Study in Historiography (London and Portland, OR: Vallentine Mitchell Publishers, 2003), 308 pp., $49.50 (hb), ISBN 0853034907. Sue Vice, Representing the Holocaust (London and Portland, OR: Vallentine Mitchell Publishers), 280 pp., £17.50 (pb), £42.50 (hb), ISBN 0853034966. The extensive literature available about the Holocaust grows daily, and it seems to be nearly limitless in scope. The books that will be discussed in the following review are merely a microcosm of this literature, but unfortunately, they, like much of the other literature on the Holocaust, differ greatly in quality and focus. In a sense, this is an essay about the general themes and overarching concepts of Holocaust research as exemplified by the seven books reviewed here. As a result of the sheer volume of literature on the Holocaust, its antecedents, and the crimes it entailed, it is nearly impossible to claim that one knows all of the literature. One may know all the books in a specific segment of Holocaust research, but with approximately 300 new books on the Holocaust and nearly fifty Webster University, Berchtoldgasse 1,A-1220 Vienna, Austria. [email protected]. Contemporary European History, 15, 1 (2006), pp. 117–129 C 2006 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S0960777306003134 Printed in the United Kingdom Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.8, on 01 Oct 2021 at 06:52:04, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777306003134 118 Contemporary European History on the Third Reich appearing in English each year,1 one would be hard-pressed to have read it all. The books published in other languages offer an even greater number. The history of the Holocaust and the crimes of Hitler’s Germany is far from complete. New facets are continually being discovered and old facets re-evaluated. New documents, oral history sources and opinions continue to flood the market. As the Second World War generation ages and dies, there may be other surprises, at least from the Allied side, as archives are opened, but this is likely to add little to the documentation that is already available in German archives and in foreign archives about Germany during this period. The opening of non-German archives will give us a more balanced and nuanced picture of the course of the war and what Germany’s enemies actually knew about the crimes being committed as it progressed. A number of books such as Richard Breitman’s Official Secrets and Walter Laquer’s The Terrible Secret have already dealt with the issue of Allied secrecy and the Holocaust, but we can expect to see more written on this topic as confidential and top-secret documents are slowly declassified in the coming years. British military historian John Keegan has described the Allied need for secrecy in order to win the Second World War and the importance of classification to keep the code-breaking operations at Bletchley Park under wraps, a topic that Breitman discusses in detail in Official Secrets.2 The majority of the books published on the Holocaust, however, are not based on revealing new documents and are less new research than a re-evaluation of older claims and ideas. All except one of the books reviewed here fall into this category. The only truly original research is to be found in Cornelia Hecht’s Deutsche Juden und Antisemitismus in der Weimarer Republik, which, although in many ways flawed in its methodology, tackles the important subject of how Jews themselves viewed antisemitism in the pre-Nazi years. In saying this, it should be noted that Inga Clendinnen’s Reading the Holocaust is new only because of her line of argument, that the Holocaust as a human-created event can be understood. Even with nearly sixty years of Holocaust research and writing behind us, the debate over the Holocaust and how it should be presented and understood continues. Evaluating the works discussed has been challenging since the theses and 1 Bowker’s Books in Print Professional lists 293 books for the subject heading ‘Holocaust’ for 2004, 300 for 2003 and 313 for 2002.For2004, it lists forty-nine books under the subject ‘National Socialism’ and for 1998 and 1999, fifty and forty-two respectively. The author would like to thank Ronald Coleman of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum Library in Washington, DC, for his assistance in confirming these figures with a search of OCLC WorldCat. The number of books catalogued in any given year differs slightly from the figures cited above, since books published earlier are often catalogued in the following year. 2 Richard Breitman, Official Secrets: What the Nazis Planned, What the British and Americans Knew (New Yo r k : H i l l & Wa n g , 1998); John Keegan, ‘What the Allies Knew’, New York Times, 25 Nov. 1996; Richard Breitman, Norman J.W. Goda, Timothy Naftali and Robert Wolfe. U.S. Intelligence and the Nazis (Washington, DC: National Archives Trust Fund Board, 2004, and Cambridge University Press, 2005, with a new conclusion); and Walter Laquer, The Terrible Secret. An Investigation into the Suppression of Information about Hitler’s ‘Final Solution’ (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1980). Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.8, on 01 Oct 2021 at 06:52:04, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777306003134 Understanding the Holocaust: The Past and Future of Holocaust Studies 119 subjects of analysis are diverse. There are, however, commonalities for discussion and comparison, points of contact between the works under review. The question of understanding the mass murder of millions is critical to all the works reviewed here, and yet there still seems to be no consensus on the question of whether the Holocaust is comprehensible or not. The sheer magnitude of the crimes in question leaves any scholar of this series of events to ponder their significance for future generations and the meaning of all of these lost lives. In these works the debate about the meaning of the Holocaust appears to be more important than the debate about how the Holocaust should be defined. What should we take away as a lesson from the Holocaust? The phrase ‘never again’, seen on monuments throughout Germany and eastern Europe, seems to be too little. There must be more, and the authors of these works struggle with the difficulties of trying to comprehend an event that is viewed by some as unique in human history. The uniqueness of the Holocaust has been a constant point of contention in its historiography, and its significance does not seem to have waned in the recent literature. Old debates are discussed while at the same time new arguments enter the mix, thus complicating the issues at hand even more. In various ways each book reviewed here grapples with old issues and new arguments to ‘invent’ a consensus that gives meaning to the deaths of millions in one of the most horrible human tragedies of all time. What exactly is the Holocaust and what does it mean for us? On this point, the books take very different stances. There is something unnerving about any attempt to comprehend the Holocaust. Perhaps it is possible to believe that one has come to an individual understanding of the Holocaust as Inga Clendinnen claims, but this reviewer would argue that this is an utter impossibility. The comprehension required to contemplate such events would test the limits of our humanity. Clendinnen’s Reading the Holocaust is interesting because it takes the point of view of the ‘casual’ reader of Holocaust literature and seeks to assist ‘perplexed outsiders’ (p. 5) in understanding how the Holocaust could occur and reviewing the literature available on this subject. Clendinnen states in her introduction that her purpose is ‘to challenge that bafflement, and the demoralisation which attends it’. She wants ‘to dispel the “Gorgon-effect” – the sickening of imagination and curiosity and the draining of the will which afflicts so many of us when we try to look squarely at the persons and processes implicated in the Holocaust’. She states succinctly, I want to arrive at a clearer understanding of at least some of those persons and processes to be confident that the whole is potentially understandable. This is not a matter of arriving at some ‘Aha! now I comprehend everything!’ theory or moment. The understanding I seek comes from framing sufficiently precise questions to be able to see exactly what is before us, whether persons or processes. It is both cumulative, and never complete. (p. 4) Unfortunately, it is exactly this precise framing of questions that is not found in Clendinnen’s work. Although she has worked on anthropological studies of how societies function, this particular work seems to be quite superficial, since it is a treatise based on her reading of Holocaust literature rather than a history based on Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core.
Recommended publications
  • Remembrance and (National/Collective)
    BEYOND CAMPS AND FORCED LABOUR Current International Research on Survivors of Nazi Persecution Fourth International Multidisciplinary Conference at the Imperial War Museum, London 4-6 January 2012 ______________________________________________________________________ PROGRAMME Wednesday, 4 January 2012 9.30-10.30 Registration and Coffee 10.30-12.30 Opening Session (Cinema) Welcome Suzanne Bardgett (Imperial War Museum) Johannes-Dieter Steinert (University of Wolverhampton) Jessica Reinisch (Birkbeck College) David Cesarani (Royal Holloway) Keynote: Paul A. Shapiro (Director of the Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum / USA) Opening the archives of the International Tracing Service: A gold mine and a warning 12.30-14.00 Lunch Break (Conference Room) 14.00-16.00 PANELS PANEL 1 (Room 1) Memory and identity Chair: Hanna Ulatowska (University of Texas at Dallas) Melanie Dejnega (University of Bielefeld, Germany) Post-war immigrants in Austria: identity and belonging in life story interviews Diane Garst (University of Texas at Dallas, USA) Forced marches of World War II: exploring Europe and the Philippines through the lenses of survivors Holly Gilbert (London, UK) Mapping Berlin: memories in the present moment Malin Thor (Malmo University College, Sweden) Narratives about identities and communities in the shadow of the Holocaust: the archive „Jewish memories‟ at the National Museum of Cultural History in Sweden PANEL 2 (Room 2) Refugees and survivors in the UK Chair: Robert Eaglestone (Royal Holloway)
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the 2011 International Conference on Cultural Diplomacy in the EU
    The 2011 International Conference on Cultural Diplomacy in the EU "Crisis, Conflict, and Culture: The Role of Cultural Diplomacy in the European Project" (Brussels, International Conference, December 6th - 9th, 2011) Bringing Cultures Together Through the Arts to Facilitate Cultural Diplomacy in the Context of the European Project Dr. Gregory Weeks,1 International Relations Department, Webster University Dr. Stefan Stoev,2 Chairman and Founder of the IDEA Society3 Culture is central to international relations. As the carrier of culture, the arts have an important role to play in this regard, and they must be given their proper due as part of the diplomatic process. In times when Europe’s economy is under pressure, cultural diplomacy takes on increased importance for inter- European as well as worldwide understanding and cooperation. History has shown over centuries that the arts can be instrumentalized as an effective tool of "soft" power. U.S. Secretary of States Hillary Rodham Clinton has referred to this as "smart power."4 The arts wield a strong influence. They can inspire or degrade cultures, enable interaction among communities, tear people apart or bring them together. They are a strong asset for opening a difficult dialogue. Through the arts, people can approach sensitive topics in an open and respectful way and breach difficult subjects as well as address political agendas on sensitive topics, for which it is sometimes difficult to find the right words. The Arts have never been intended to solve political problems, but they can be a beautiful facilitator of cultural diplomacy. The fact is that art can not only be a manifestation of beauty and humanity but also a representation of politics and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory and Identity
    BEYOND CAMPS AND FORCED LABOUR Current International Research on Survivors of Nazi Persecution Fourth International Multidisciplinary Conference at the Imperial War Museum, London 4-6 January 2012 ______________________________________________________________________ Wednesday, 4 January 2012 ................................................................................................................................. 2 9.30-10.30 Registration and Coffee ................................................................................................ 2 10.30-12.30 Opening Session (Cinema) ......................................................................................... 2 12.30-14.00 Lunch Break (Conference Room) ............................................................................. 2 14.00-16.00 PANELS ............................................................................................................................... 2 16.00-16.30 Tea Break (Conference Room) ................................................................................... 3 16.30-18.30 PANELS ............................................................................................................................... 3 19.00-20.30 Reception (Main Atrium) ........................................................................................... 4 Thursday, 5 January 2012 ................................................................................................................................ 4 10.00-10.30 Coffee (Conference Room) .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Program of the Thirtieth Annual Conference German Studies Association September 28 – October 1, 2006 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Hilton Pittsburgh German Studies Association Main Office: 1200 Academy Street Kalamazoo, MI 49006-3295 USA Tel.: (269) 337-7364 Fax: (269) 337-7251 www.thegsa.org e-mail: [email protected] Technical Support: [email protected] Officers: President: Katherine Roper (St. Mary’s College), 2005-06 Vice President: Sara Lennox (Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst), 2005-06 Secretary-Treasurer: Gerald A. Fetz (University of Montana), 2005-08 Executive Director: David E. Barclay (Kalamazoo College) Executive Committee: Volker Berghahn (Columbia University), 2006 Stephen Brockmann (Carnegie Mellon University), 2007 Gary Cohen (University of Minnesota) 2007 Carol Anne Costabile-Heming (Southwest Missouri State Univ.), 2008 Sabine Hake (University of Texas at Austin), 2006 Mary Hampton (Air Command and Staff College), 2007 Dagmar Herzog (Graduate Center, City University of New York), 2008 Suzanne Marchand (Louisiana State University), 2007 Patricia Herminghouse (University of Rochester), 2006 ex officio non-voting Diethelm Prowe (Carleton College), ex officio non-voting Institutional Patrons Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Militärgeschichtliches Forschungsinstitut U.S. Liaison Office Potsdam American Institute of Contemporary Nanovic Institute for European Studies at German Studies the University of Notre Dame Austrian Cultural Institute Northern Arizona University Austrian Fulbright Commission United States Holocaust Memorial
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Organizations, Scholars and Educators Sound Alarm on Surge in Hate Crimes Issue Call to Action to Lawmakers and Citizens
    Edmond J. Safra Plaza 36 Battery Place, New York, NY 10280 646.437.4202 www.mjhnyc.org FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Lisa Safier / 646.437.4336 / [email protected] December 6, 2016 Holocaust Organizations, Scholars and Educators Sound Alarm on Surge in Hate Crimes Issue Call to Action to Lawmakers and Citizens (New York, NY) – In a powerful statement issued by an array of Holocaust institutions, scholars and educators from around the world, an alarm is being sounded on the rise of groups that promote intolerance and promote hate speech. These 90 institutions and 71 individuals call on lawmakers to condemn white nationalist groups and ask citizens to be vigilant. The statement is as follows: Recent months have seen a surge in unabashed racism and hate speech – including blatant antisemitism and attacks on Hispanics, Muslims, African-Americans, women, the LGBTQ community, as well as other targeted groups. Journalists have been threatened. Places of worship, schools and playgrounds have been defaced with Nazi symbols intended to intimidate and arouse fear. White supremacist groups have become self- congratulatory and emboldened. As Holocaust scholars, educators and institutions, we are alarmed by these trends. History teaches us that intolerance, unchecked, leads to persecution and violence. We denounce racism and the politics of fear that fuels it. We stand in solidarity with all vulnerable groups. We take Elie Wiesel’s words to heart: “I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation." Therefore, we call upon all elected officials as well as all civic and religious leaders to forcefully and explicitly condemn the rise in hate speech and any attacks on our democratic principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-War Immigrants in Austria
    PANEL 1: Memory and identity Melanie Dejnega (University of Bielefeld, Germany) Post-war immigrants in Austria: identity and belonging in life story interviews By the end of the Second World War, more than one million refugees came to Austria, of which about half a million stayed. Their background and wartime experiences were as varying as could be. Some of them were survivors of the Holocaust or of forced labor, others were members of German speaking minorities having been expelled from South-Eastern and Eastern Europe. However, all of them share the experience of integration into Austrian postwar-society. The situation they faced in Austria was difficult, particularly for those, who did not speak German. These “first immigrants of the Second Republic” who are still alive have been living in Austria for more than sixty years so far. In my paper I will analyze several life story interviews conducted with representatives of this group: I will focus on the constructions of identity and senses of belonging as they are reflected in narratives of the life story by introducing and applying a narratological method. Hence my paper elucidates not only concepts of identity and belonging of post-war immigrants in Austria, but also evaluates, to which extent narratological methods can contribute to analyze life story interviews. Melanie Dejnega, Mag. studied History, Sociology and Spanish at the University of Vienna, Humboldt University and Freie Universität Berlin; Master Thesis (2008) about the impacts of compensation policy on narratives in life-story interviews with survivors of Mauthausen Concentration Camp . Collaborator in “Mauthausen Survivors Research Project” and other projects at the Ludwig Boltzmann-Institute for Historical Social Science, Vienna.
    [Show full text]
  • October 4–7, 2007 San Diego, California Town and Country Resort & Convention Center
    Program of the Thirty-First Annual Conference German Studies Association October 4–7, 2007 San Diego, California Town and Country Resort & Convention Center German Studies Association Main Office: 1200 Academy Street Kalamazoo, MI 49006–3295 USA Tel.: (269) 337–7364 Fax: (269) 337–7251 www.thegsa.org e-mail: [email protected] Technical Support: [email protected] Officers: President: Sara Lennox (University of Massachusetts, Amherst), 2006– 07 Vice President: Celia Applegate (University of Rochester), 2006–07 Secretary-Treasurer: Gerald A. Fetz (University of Montana), 2005–08 Executive Director: David E. Barclay (Kalamazoo College) Executive Committee: Doris L. Bergen (University of Toronto), 2009 Stephen Brockmann (Carnegie Mellon University), 2007 Gary Cohen (University of Minnesota), 2007 Carol Anne Costabile-Heming (Southwest Missouri State University), 2008 Mary Hampton (Air Command and Staff College), 2007 Dagmar Herzog (Graduate Center, City University of New York), 2008 Barbara Kosta (University of Arizona), 2009 Suzanne Marchand (Louisiana State University), 2008 Helmut Walser Smith (Vanderbilt University), 2009 Diethelm Prowe (Carleton College), ex officio Katherine Roper (Saint Mary’s College of California), ex officioAlexander Institutional Patrons Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Militärgeschichtliches Forschungsinstitut U.S. Liaison Office Potsdam American Institute of Contemporary Nanovic Institute for European Studies at German Studies the University of Notre Dame Austrian Cultural Institute Northern Arizona University
    [Show full text]
  • THE DISABLED, JEWS and NAZI GENOCIDE By
    “BALLAST EXISTENCES”: THE DISABLED, JEWS AND NAZI GENOCIDE by Jill Mitchell Nielsen B.A., University of British Columbia, 2003 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in The College of Graduate Studies (Interdisciplinary Studies) (Political Science/History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Okanagan) December 2012 © Jill Mitchell Nielsen, 2012 Abstract This thesis examines the social construction of disability in the Third Reich and the interrelationship between Nazi euthanasia and the Holocaust through a comparative analysis of the historiography and using key theories from the field of disability studies. I argue that constructions of disability form an essential part of the creation of a Nazi philosophy that sought to alter fundamentally and irrevocably the biological and racial makeup of Europe. The bio-racial philosophy of the Third Reich had its origins in the eugenics of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century and the early development of racial hygiene precepts. Eugenics and racial hygiene were radicalized under Nazi rule to create a philosophy that was hyper- concerned with the blood purity of the German Volk. This ideology was implemented first with a program of euthanasia (Aktion T4). The genocide of the disabled was, in many ways, prototypical to the development of the Final Solution. A comparative analysis shows that there were overlapping phases in the genocide of the disabled and the Holocaust, particularly with respect to the killing of the Jewish mentally ill, the targeting of mentally ill patients in the East, Aktion 14f13 and the construction of the death camps, particularly during Aktion Reinhardt.
    [Show full text]
  • David A. Gerber Introduction: Finding Disabled Veterans in History
    David A. Gerber Introduction: Finding Disabled Veterans in History Disabled veterans are neglected figures in the histories of war and peace, and the his‑ torical scholarship about them at present is fragmentary. There is no synthetic history of disabled veterans. This volume is the only historical collection on the subject. The volume exclusively reflects the histories of large and relatively affluent Western societ‑ ies, at times with particular emphasis on the United States that reflects both imbalances in the literature and the editor’s own specialization. The volume also concentrates upon the experiences of regular armies as opposed, for example, to guerrilla forces. One con‑ sequence is that the disabled veteran written about here is always “he,” for women have been infrequent and statistically underrepresented participants in Western national armies, and have rarely served in active fighting roles in such forces, though serving with distinction at times in irregular combat forces, such as the World War II antifas‑ cist resistance movements. To be sure, women have served in regular armies, mostly as uniformed nurses, and have been injured in combat zones and become disabled while doing so. If the American experience is representative, these disabled women veterans have been seriously neglected by the governments they have served. They have certainly been neglected by historians, whatever their nationality, for there is even less written about their experiences than those of men.1 He, then, is a man injured or becoming chronically
    [Show full text]
  • School of Medicine
    School of Medicine Vanderbilt University 2012/2013 Archived 2012/2013 Medical School Catalog Containing general information and courses of study for the 2012/2013 session corrected to August 2012 Nashville The university reserves the right, through its established procedures, to modify the requirements for admission and graduation and to change other rules, regulations, and provisions, including those stated in this bulletin and other publications, and to refuse admission to any student, or to require the with- drawal of a student if it is determined to be in the interest of the student or the university. All students, full- or part-time, who are enrolled in Vanderbilt courses are subject to the same policies. Policies concerning noncurricular matters and concerning withdrawal for medical or emotional reasons can be found in the Student Handbook, which is on the Vanderbilt website at vanderbilt.edu/student_handbookArchived. 2012/2013 NONDISCRIMINATION STATEMENTMedical School Catalog In compliance with federal law, including the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972, Sections 503 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Executive Order 11246, the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, as amended, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, Vanderbilt University does not discriminate against individuals on the basis of their race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, military service, or genetic information in its administration of educational policies, programs, or activities; admissions policies; scholarship and loan programs; athletic or other university-administered programs; or employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the Lasa President
    MESSAGE FROM THE LASA PRESIDENT We come together in San Juan to commemorate LASA’s past, to debate the cutting- edge issues that are shaping the field in the present, and to work collectively in building the future of Latin/o-a American Studies. LASA2006 marks our Association’s 40th anniversary and this Congress will carry on LASA’s finest traditions of promoting scholarly debate and collegial collaboration across the Americas. We also hope this XXVI International Congress in Puerto Rico will continue to point the way toward LASA’s future as a more thoroughly transnational association which will reflect the spirit of our new Mission Statement: “LASA fosters intellectual discussion, research, and teaching on Latin America, the Caribbean, and its peoples throughout the Americas, promotes the interests of its diverse membership, and encourages civic engagement through network building and public debate.” LASA2006 is an invitation to all of us to engage in scholarly and pedagogical interdisciplinary debates across all sorts of borders which would further that mission. The Congress theme, “Decentering Latin American Studies,” will advance the transnationalization of the field by exploring how the study of Latin America, the Caribbean and its peoples is practiced within the United States, in Latin America and the Caribbean, and in other regions of the world. The Congress program builds on the wide variety of approaches and epistemologies that emerge from multiple positionalities and diverse geopolitical locations in collectively re-imagining Latin American studies for the 21st century. LASA2006 plenaries, featured sessions and other special events will offer an inter-related set of conversations which will hopefully spark debate Sonia E.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Organizations and Historians Urge Action to Preserve US Government Agency That Monitors Anti-Semitism
    Edmond J. Safra Plaza 36 Battery Place, New York, NY 10280 646.437.4202 www.mjhnyc.org FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Lisa Safier / 646.437.4336 / [email protected] March 13, 2017 Holocaust Organizations and Historians Urge Action to Preserve US Government Agency that Monitors Anti-Semitism (New York, NY) – With reports surfacing that the President plans to defund the U.S. State Department’s Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism, more than 100 Holocaust institutions, scholars, and educators from around the world are calling on government officials not to cut, but to maintain and strengthen the office. These institutions and individuals cite the recent examples of hatred, xenophobia, and racism spreading across the nation and ask the public to call Congressional and Senate offices. The statement is as follows: The undersigned Holocaust remembrance organizations, educators, and historians ask you to speak out and take action against hatred. We are alarmed by reports that the President plans to defund the US State Department’s Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism, an office that tracks and counteracts anti-Semitism abroad. Ira Forman, the most recent Special Envoy in charge of that office, was our voice to a world in the throes of xenophobia and racism. He recently wrote, “Anti-Semitism is not only a Jewish problem; Jew-hatred — like other forms of religious and ethnic prejudice — is a threat to the very foundations of liberal democracies.” We urge the US government to maintain and strengthen the State Department’s Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism and to create a new office to address this urgent issue domestically.
    [Show full text]