DOCSLIB.ORG

Note to Reader: the Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs (FMP) Includes All Amendments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Note to Reader: the Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs (FMP) Includes All Amendments Note to Reader: The Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs (FMP) includes all amendments that have been approved by the Secretary of Commerce through March 5, 2021. Some information contained in this FMP, however, needs to be updated since typical FMP amendments tend to change only those portions of the FMP that are relevant to a specific action. To bring all background information and formatting in this FMP up to date, staff are preparing a “housekeeping amendment”. Like all FMP amendments, the housekeeping amendment will be reviewed by the Council, which, if adopted, will be submitted to the Secretary for review and approval under the MSA. Following that review and approval process, a revised FMP will be posted to the Council's website. In the meantime, Council staff are available to answer any questions you may have about this or any other Council FMP. Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs March 2021 North Pacific Fishery Management Council 1007 West Third, Suite 400 Anchorage, Alaska 99501-2252 Phone: (907) 271-2809 Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 6 2 Procedures for FMP Implementation .............................................................................................................. 9 3 Finding of Consistency of Existing State Regulations with the FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and Other Applicable Federal Law ................................................................................................................ 13 4 Definitions of Terms ....................................................................................................................................... 14 5 Description of Fishery Management Unit ..................................................................................................... 16 6 Status Determination Criteria and Annual Catch Limits ............................................................................. 18 6.1 Five-Tier System ............................................................................................................................................ 19 6.1.1 Tiers 1 through 3 ................................................................................................................................. 21 6.1.2 Tier 4 .................................................................................................................................................... 21 6.1.3 Tier 5 .................................................................................................................................................... 22 6.2 Rebuilding Overfished Fisheries .................................................................................................................... 24 6.2.1 Bering Sea Tanner (Chionoecetes bairdi) crab .................................................................................... 24 6.2.2 Bering Sea snow (Chionoecetes opilio) crab ........................................................................................ 26 6.2.3 St Matthew blue king (Paralithodes platypus) crab ............................................................................ 27 6.2.4 Pribilof Islands blue king crab (Paralithodes platypus)........................................................................ 28 6.2.5 St. Matthew blue king (Paralithodes platypus) crab ........................................................................... 29 7 Goal and Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 30 7.1 Management Goal ......................................................................................................................................... 30 7.2 Management Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 30 7.2.1 Biological Conservation Objective: Ensure the long-term reproductive viability of king and Tanner crab populations. ................................................................................................................................... 30 7.2.2 Economic and Social Objective: Maximize economic and social benefits to the nation over time. ... 30 7.2.3 Gear Conflict Objective: Minimize gear conflict among fisheries. ...................................................... 31 7.2.4 Habitat Objective: To protect, conserve, and enhance adequate quantities of essential fish habitat (EFH) to support king and Tanner crab populations and maintain a healthy ecosystem. ..................... 31 7.2.5 Vessel Safety Objective: Provide public access to the regulatory process for vessel safety considerations. ....................................................................................................................................... 32 7.2.6 Due Process Objective: Ensure that access to the regulatory process and opportunity for redress are available to all interested parties. .......................................................................................................... 32 7.2.7 Research and Management Objective: Provide fisheries research, data collection, and analysis to ensure a sound information base for management decisions. .............................................................. 32 8 Management Measures .................................................................................................................................. 34 8.1 Category 1 Federal Management Measures Fixed By The FMP ................................................................... 34 8.1.1 Legal Gear ............................................................................................................................................ 34 8.1.2 Permit Requirements .......................................................................................................................... 35 8.1.3 Federal Observer Requirements ......................................................................................................... 35 8.1.4 Limited Access ..................................................................................................................................... 35 8.1.5 Superexclusive Registration in Norton Sound ..................................................................................... 38 8.1.6 Essential Fish Habitat and Habitat Areas of Particular Concern .......................................................... 38 8.1.7 American Fisheries Act (AFA) sideboard restrictions .......................................................................... 40 8.2 Category 2 Framework Management Measures ............................................................................................ 40 8.2.1 Minimum Size Limits ........................................................................................................................... 40 8.2.2 Total Allowable Catch and Guideline Harvest Level ............................................................................ 41 8.2.3 In-season Adjustments ........................................................................................................................ 42 8.2.4 District, Subdistrict, and Section Boundaries ...................................................................................... 44 BSAI Crab FMP i March 2021 8.2.5 Fishing Seasons .................................................................................................................................... 45 8.2.6 Sex Restrictions ................................................................................................................................... 46 8.2.7 Pot Limits ............................................................................................................................................. 46 8.2.8 Registration Areas ............................................................................................................................... 47 8.2.9 Closed Waters ..................................................................................................................................... 49 8.2.10 Harvest Limitations for AFA vessels .................................................................................................. 49 8.3 Category 3 Management Measures Deferred to State................................................................................... 49 8.3.1 Reporting Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 49 8.3.2 Gear Placement and Removal ............................................................................................................. 50 8.3.3 Gear Storage ........................................................................................................................................ 50 8.3.4 Vessel Tank Inspections ....................................................................................................................... 50 8.3.5 Gear Modifications .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seafood Watch Seafood Report: Crabs Blue Crab
    Seafood Watch Seafood Report: Crabs Volume I Blue Crab Callinectes sapidus Writer/Editor:AliceCascorbi Fisheries Research Analyst Monterey Bay Aquarium Additional Research: Heather Blough Audubon Living Oceans Program Final 14 February 2004 Seafood Watch® Blue Crab Report February 14, 2004 About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long- term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the Internet (seafoodwatch.org) or obtained from the Seafood Watch® program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices”, “Good Alternatives” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Species-Specific Edna-Based Test Systems For
    REPORT SNO 7544-2020 Development of species-specific eDNA-based test systems for monitoring of non-indigenous Decapoda in Danish marine waters © Henrik Carl, Natural History Museum, Denmark History © Henrik Carl, Natural NIVA Denmark Water Research REPORT Main Office NIVA Region South NIVA Region East NIVA Region West NIVA Denmark Gaustadalléen 21 Jon Lilletuns vei 3 Sandvikaveien 59 Thormøhlensgate 53 D Njalsgade 76, 4th floor NO-0349 Oslo, Norway NO-4879 Grimstad, Norway NO-2312 Ottestad, Norway NO-5006 Bergen Norway DK 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (45) 39 17 97 33 Internet: www.niva.no Title Serial number Date Development of species-specific eDNA-based test systems for monitoring 7544-2020 22 October 2020 of non-indigenous Decapoda in Danish marine waters Author(s) Topic group Distribution Steen W. Knudsen and Jesper H. Andersen – NIVA Denmark Environmental monitor- Public Peter Rask Møller – Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen ing Geographical area Pages Denmark 54 Client(s) Client's reference Danish Environmental Protection Agency (Miljøstyrelsen) UCB and CEKAN Printed NIVA Project number 180280 Summary We report the development of seven eDNA-based species-specific test systems for monitoring of marine Decapoda in Danish marine waters. The seven species are 1) Callinectes sapidus (blå svømmekrabbe), 2) Eriocheir sinensis (kinesisk uldhånds- krabbe), 3) Hemigrapsus sanguineus (stribet klippekrabbe), 4) Hemigrapsus takanoi (pensel-klippekrabbe), 5) Homarus ameri- canus (amerikansk hummer), 6) Paralithodes camtschaticus (Kamchatka-krabbe) and 7) Rhithropanopeus harrisii (østameri- kansk brakvandskrabbe).
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Moore's Miracleman: Harbinger of the Modern Age of Comics
    Alan Moore’s Miracleman: Harbinger of the Modern Age of Comics Jeremy Larance Introduction On May 26, 2014, Marvel Comics ran a full-page advertisement in the New York Times for Alan Moore’s Miracleman, Book One: A Dream of Flying, calling the work “the series that redefined comics… in print for the first time in over 20 years.” Such an ad, particularly one of this size, is a rare move for the comic book industry in general but one especially rare for a graphic novel consisting primarily of just four comic books originally published over thirty years before- hand. Of course, it helps that the series’ author is a profitable lumi- nary such as Moore, but the advertisement inexplicably makes no reference to Moore at all. Instead, Marvel uses a blurb from Time to establish the reputation of its “new” re-release: “A must-read for scholars of the genre, and of the comic book medium as a whole.” That line came from an article written by Graeme McMillan, but it is worth noting that McMillan’s full quote from the original article begins with a specific reference to Moore: “[Miracleman] represents, thanks to an erratic publishing schedule that both predated and fol- lowed Moore’s own Watchmen, Moore’s simultaneous first and last words on ‘realism’ in superhero comics—something that makes it a must-read for scholars of the genre, and of the comic book medium as a whole.” Marvel’s excerpt, in other words, leaves out the very thing that McMillan claims is the most important aspect of Miracle- man’s critical reputation as a “missing link” in the study of Moore’s influence on the superhero genre and on the “medium as a whole.” To be fair to Marvel, for reasons that will be explained below, Moore refused to have his name associated with the Miracleman reprints, so the company was legally obligated to leave his name off of all advertisements.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Fisheries: Policy, Trade and Sustainable Nal of Fisheries Management 22:852-862
    Climate Change and Alaska Fisheries TERRY JOHNSON Alaska Sea Grant University of Alaska Fairbanks 2016 ISBN 978-1-56612-187-3 http://doi.org/10.4027/ccaf.2016 MAB-67 $10.00 Credits Alaska Sea Grant is supported by the US Department of Commerce, NOAA National Sea Grant, grant NA14OAR4170079 (A/152-32) and by the University of Alaska Fairbanks with state funds. Sea Grant is a partnership with public and private sectors combining research, education, and extension. This national network of universities meets changing environmental and Alaska Sea Grant economic needs of people in coastal, ocean, and Great Lakes University of Alaska Fairbanks regions. Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-5040 Funding for this project was provided by the Alaska Center for Climate Assessment and Policy (ACCAP). Cover photo by (888) 789-0090 Deborah Mercy. alaskaseagrant.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................... 2 Take-home messages ...................................................................... 2 Introduction............................................................................................. 3 1. Ocean temperature and circulation ................................................ 4 2. Ocean acidification ............................................................................ 9 3. Invasive species, harmful algal blooms, and disease-causing pathogens .................................................... 12 4. Fisheries effects—groundfish and crab ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pribilof Islands Red King Crab
    2011 Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for the Pribilof Islands Blue King Crab Fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Regions R.J. Foy Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA Executive Summary *highlighted text will be filled in with new survey and catch data prior to the September 2011 meeting. 1. Stock: Pribilof Islands blue king crab, Paralithodes platypus 2. Catches: Retained catches have not occurred since 1998/1999. Bycatch and discards have been steady or decreased in recent years to current levels near 0.5 t (0.001 million lbs). 3. Stock biomass: Stock biomass in recent years was decreasing between the 1995 and 2008 survey, and after a slight increase in 2009, there was a decrease in most size classes in 2010. 4. Recruitment: Recruitment indices are not well understood for Pribilof blue king crab. Pre-recruit have remained relatively consistent in the past 10 years although may not be well assessed with the survey. 5. Management performance: MSST Biomass Retained Total Year TAC OFL ABC (MMBmating) Catch Catch 2,105 113A 0 0 0.5 1.81 2008/09 (4.64) (0.25) (0.001) (0.004) 2,105 513B 0 0 0.5 1.81 2009/10 (4.64) (1.13) (0.001) (0.004) 286 C 1.81 2010/11 (0.63) (0.004) 2011/12 xD All units are tons (million pounds) of crabs and the OFL is a total catch OFL for each year. The stock was below MSST in 2009/10 and is hence overfished. Overfishing did not occur during the 2009/10 fishing year.
    [Show full text]
  • Biennial Reproduction with Embryonic Diapause in Lopholithodes Foraminatus (Anomura: Lithodidae) from British Columbia Waters Author(S): William D
    Biennial reproduction with embryonic diapause in Lopholithodes foraminatus (Anomura: Lithodidae) from British Columbia waters Author(s): William D. P. Duguid and Louise R. Page Source: Invertebrate Biology, Vol. 130, No. 1 (2011), pp. 68-82 Published by: Wiley on behalf of American Microscopical Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016672 Accessed: 10-04-2017 18:37 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016672?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms American Microscopical Society, Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Invertebrate Biology This content downloaded from 205.225.241.126 on Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:37:38 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Invertebrate Biology 130(1): 68-82. © 2011, The American Microscopical Society, Inc. DOI: 10.1111/j.l 744-7410.2011.00221 .x Biennial reproduction with embryonic diapause in Lopholithodes foraminatus (Anomura: Lithodidae) from British Columbia waters William D. P. DuguicT and Louise R. Page Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3N5, Canada Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Alaska Reindeer Populations and Range Conditions
    Paper presented at The First Arctic Ungulate Conference, Nuuk, Greenland, 3-8. September, 1991. Assessment of Alaska reindeer populations and range conditions J. D. Swanson1 and M. H. W. Barker2 1 USDA Soil Conservation Service, 201 E. 9th Avenue, Suite 300, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, U.S.A. 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska Anchorage, Alaska 99508, U.S.A. Abstract: Populations of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) have fluctated greatly since their introduction to Alaska in 1891. In the 1930s, reported numbers exceeded 600,000. Presently, 38,000 reindeer graze 6.2 million ha of rangeland and woodland in Western Alaska (from 66°54'N to 52°07'N latitude). Condition of winter range producing fruticose lichens (Cladina rangiferina, Cladina arbuscula, Cladina stellaris, Cetraria cucullata, Cetra- ria islandica) is of major concern. Monitoring programs have been established for vegetation, fire, reindeer and wildlife. Reindeer have overgrazed lichen resources on some Bering Sea Islands. Wildfires have had the greatest impact on lichen range depletion on the mainland. Overgrazing has been a problem in localized areas. Moose (AIces alces) and muskox (Ovibos moschatus) rarely contribute to major lichen depletion. 60-80% of the mainland and 5-30% of most island winter lichen ranges are presently estimated to be in good to excel• lent ecological condition. Procedures for assessing condition of the lichen ranges are being further refined. Keywords: Alaska, winter, pastures, lichens, population dynamics, sampling techniques Rangifer, 12 (1): 33-43 Introduction Siberian reindeer herders were originally Sheldon Jackson, General Agent of Education brought to instruct local natives in reindeer in Alaska, toured the northern coasts of Siberia husbandry and herding techniques (Brickey, and Alaska in 1890.
    [Show full text]
  • Noaa Coastal Mapping Program Project Completion Report
    NOAA COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT PROJECT AK0502 Western Krenitzin Islands and Northeast Unalaska Island Aleutian Islands, Alaska Introduction Coastal Mapping Program (CMP) Project AK0502 provides coastal zone mapping data of the area around the Krenitzin Islands. This area includes Akun Island, Akun Bay, Tangik Island, Poa Island, Akutan Island, Akutan Bay, Akutan Pass, Unaiga Island, Unaiga Pass, Egg Island, Sedanka Island, Udagak Strait and Unalaska Island from Cape Cheerful through Unalaska Bay and Dutch Harbor to Beaver Inlet, almost to Kayak Cape. The digital cartographic feature file (DCFF) may be used in support of the NOAA Nautical Charting Program (NCP) as well as geographic information systems (GIS) for a variety of coastal zone management applications. Project Design This project was designed per a request from the NOAA Hydrographic Surveys Division (HSD) of the Office of Coast Survey, NOAA, for GIS data in support of HSD operations. Based on an analysis of project requirements and results of a source data search, it was determined that CMP procedures for multiple source projects would apply for this project. Available source data deemed adequate for successful completion of this project included sources acquired between January 2000 and April 2002. Field Operations Routine CMP field operations did not apply for this project based on the origin of the project source data. Aerotriangulation The aerotriangulation task was accomplished by Western Air Maps, Inc. personnel in mid October, 2005. The image files were imported into SOCET SET, Version 5.0, using the DataThruWay, Version 5.0 software. The import process also converted the stored and compressed files to a recognized native SOCET SET format (NITF 2.0) and included supporting data extension files consisting of previously measured sensor model parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging the Cold: Crabs Reconquer the Antarctic
    Ecology, 86(3), 2005, pp. 619±625 q 2005 by the Ecological Society of America CHALLENGING THE COLD: CRABS RECONQUER THE ANTARCTIC SVEN THATJE,1,5 KLAUS ANGER,2 JAVIER A. CALCAGNO,3 GUSTAVO A. LOVRICH,4 HANS-OTTO POÈ RTNER,1 AND WOLF E. ARNTZ1 1Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Columbusstr. D-27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 2Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Foundation Alfred Wegener Institute, Helgoland, Germany 3Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Intendente GuÈiraldes 2160, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina 4Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientõ®cas y TeÂcnicas, Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientõ®cas, CC 92, V9410BFD Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina Abstract. Recent records of lithodid crabs in deeper waters off the Antarctic continental slope raised the question of the return of crabs to Antarctic waters, following their extinction in the lower Miocene ;15 million years ago. Antarctic cooling may be responsible for the impoverishment of the marine high Antarctic decapod fauna, presently comprising only ®ve benthic shrimp species. Effects of polar conditions on marine life, including lowered metabolic rates and short seasonal food availability, are discussed as main evolutionary driving forces shaping Antarctic diversity. In particular, planktotrophic larval stages should be vulnerable to the mismatch of prolonged development and short periods of food avail- ability, selecting against complex life cycles. We hypothesize that larval lecithotrophy and cold tolerance, as recently observed in Subantarctic lithodids, represent, together with other adaptations in the adults, key features among the life-history adaptations of lithodids, potentially enabling them to conquer polar ecosystems. The return of benthic top predators to high Antarctic waters under conditions of climate change would considerably alter the benthic communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and Crab Fisheries
    JANUARY 2020 Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and FisheriesCrab Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and Crab Fisheries JANUARY 2020 JANUARY Prepared by: McDowell Group Authors and Contributions: From NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center: Ben Fissel (PI, project oversight, project design, and editor), Brian Garber-Yonts (editor). From McDowell Group, Inc.: Jim Calvin (project oversight and editor), Dan Lesh (lead author/ analyst), Garrett Evridge (author/analyst) , Joe Jacobson (author/analyst), Paul Strickler (author/analyst). From Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission: Bob Ryznar (project oversight and sub-contractor management), Jean Lee (data compilation and analysis) This report was produced and funded by the NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Funding was awarded through a competitive contract to the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission and McDowell Group, Inc. The analysis was conducted during the winter of 2018 and spring of 2019, based primarily on 2017 harvest and market data. A final review by staff from NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center was completed in June 2019 and the document was finalized in March 2016. Data throughout the report was compiled in November 2018. Revisions to source data after this time may not be reflect in this report. Typically, revisions to economic fisheries data are not substantial and data presented here accurately reflects the trends in the analyzed markets. For data sourced from NMFS and AKFIN the reader should refer to the Economic Status Report of the Groundfish Fisheries Off Alaska, 2017 (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/data/2017-economic-status-groundfish-fisheries-alaska) and Economic Status Report of the BSAI King and Tanner Crab Fisheries Off Alaska, 2018 (https://www.fisheries.noaa.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleuts: an Outline of the Ethnic History
    i Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Roza G. Lyapunova Translated by Richard L. Bland ii As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has re- sponsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Shared Beringian Heritage Program at the National Park Service is an international program that rec- ognizes and celebrates the natural resources and cultural heritage shared by the United States and Russia on both sides of the Bering Strait. The program seeks local, national, and international participation in the preservation and understanding of natural resources and protected lands and works to sustain and protect the cultural traditions and subsistence lifestyle of the Native peoples of the Beringia region. Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Author: Roza G. Lyapunova English translation by Richard L. Bland 2017 ISBN-13: 978-0-9965837-1-8 This book’s publication and translations were funded by the National Park Service, Shared Beringian Heritage Program. The book is provided without charge by the National Park Service. To order additional copies, please contact the Shared Beringian Heritage Program ([email protected]). National Park Service Shared Beringian Heritage Program © The Russian text of Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History by Roza G. Lyapunova (Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka” leningradskoe otdelenie, 1987), was translated into English by Richard L.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Occurrence of Parakeet Auklet (Aethia Psittacula) in British Columbia
    Status and Occurrence of Parakeet Auklet (Aethia psittacula) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Louis Haviland. Introduction and Distribution The Parakeet Auklet (Aethia psittacula) is a small species of auklet found breeding in the Beringia region of Alaska and Russia (Gaston and Jones 1998). This species has an Alaskan population estimated at 1 million birds (Gaston and Jones 1998). There is also a Russian population, but the exact population total is not known, due to a lack of population inventory work, but it is estimated to number about 400,000 birds with the vast majority, about 300,000 birds, found in the Sea of Okhotsk (Gaston and Jones 1998). The Parakeet Auklet has breeding colonies that are found on rocky mainland points and islands in the Gulf of Alaska (Jones et al. 2001). These sites include: Shumagin Island, Semidi Isand, Chirikof Island near Kodiak, locally in Kenai Peninsula and southeastern Alaska with small numbers south to St. Lazaria, Hazy and Forrester Island; and in the Aleutian Islands west to Buldir and Agattu Island; and in the Bering Sea at Little Diomede, St. Lawrence Island, King Island, St. Matthew Island, Pribilof Island and Nunivak Island (Sowls et al. 1978). The Parakeet Auklet also breeds in Russia in the Kurile Island chain with colonies on Chirinkontan, Lovushki, Raikoke, Matua, Yankicha, Simushir, Brat Chirpoev, Urup, and Iturup Island (Jones et al. 2001, Brazil 2009). They are also breeding on islands in the Sea of Okhotsk with colonies on Sakhalin, Tyuleniy, Iona, Talan, and Yamskyie Island (Jones et al. 2001, Brazil 2009). The Parakeet Auklet is also found breeding on Commander Island, and northwards locally along coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula, on Karaginski Island, Cape Navarin, and on Chukotka Peninsula (Konyukhov 1989, Kondratyev et al.
    [Show full text]