JournalJournal of Chemical of Chemical Technology Technology and Metallurgy,and Metallurgy, 53, 5, 53, 2018, 5, 2018 872-877

CONVERSION OF AMMONIUM CYANATE SOLUTION AT 293.15 K

Mladen E. Lilov, Plamen P. Kirilov

University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy Received 30 April 2018 8 Kliment Ohridski, Sofia 1756, Bulgaria Accepted 15 June 2018 E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Conversion of 0.064 mol L-1 ammonium cyanate solution has been studied at 298.15 K over a time period of 90 days. The data is obtained by periodic measurement of the electric conductivity, pH and concentration of the main species of the solution such as cyanate, , ammonim and ammonium hydrogencarbonate. The distribution of the species in the solution during this period is presented in graphic mode. The pH value increases gradually due to the formation of NH4HCO3 and (NH4)2CO3. The spontaneous conversion of the ammonium cyanate to a neutral substance, urea, is accompanied by a sharp conductance decrease. Ammonium cyanate hydrolysis to NH4HCO3 and (NH4)2CO3 proceeds to a much smaller extent than that of urea conversion. During 90 days stor- age of the solution at 298.15 K the degree of overall transformation of ammonium cyanate is found equal to 96.3 %. Keywords: ammonium cyanate, transformation, urea, kinetics, mechanism.

INTRODUCTION a modified form, is supported by E.E. Walker [5] and Werner [7]. Moelwyn-Hughes [11] assumes that the rate Since Wöhler’s discovery [1] that ammonium cy- depends upon collisions between unionized molecules anate undergoes a spontaneous transformation to urea the of ammonium cyanate. mechanism and kinetics of this conversion has been dis- The rate of conversion of ammonium cyanate into cussed for many years. The topic is not yet exhausted [2]. urea is studied in several isodielectric solvent-water The earliest investigations [3 - 11] show that the reaction mixtures over a wide dielectric constant range [12 - 18]. is bimolecular, that the reaction is reversible and that it The calculations based on the experimental data are is not complete in an aqueous solution. Furthermore, a compared with those obtained from existing solution partial hydrolysis of ammonim cyanate to ammonium kinetic theories. carbonate occurs, while the rate of conversion is higher According to Wyatt and Kornberg [19] the reaction in mixtures of water with , sugars, acetone, etc., NH4OCN ↔ CO(NH2)2 in unbuffered aqueous solution than that in pure water. at 343,15 K is accompanied by the formation of larger Concerning the exact nature of the bimolecular amounts of carbonate than is formerly supposed. This leads mechanism, there is a considerable controversy. Some to a modification of the rate constants of urea reaction. authors [3, 4, 8 - 10] indicate that the reaction rate de- The simultaneous formation of urea and carbonate pends upon collisions between ammonium and cyanate in aqueous solutions of ammonium, barium, or sodium ions (an ionic mechanism). Chattaway [6] argues against cyanate is studied at 333,15 and 353,15 K [20]. The the ionic mechanism and assumes that the rate depends results of Kemp and Kohnstam fully confirm Wyatt and upon collisions between molecules of ammonia and Kornberg’s observation [19] that carbonate formation isocianic acid (a non-ionic mechanism). This view, in is not negligible in the decomposition of ammonium 872 Mladen E. Lilov, Plamen P. Kirilov

cyanate. A general rate equation describing urea and the rate of the process under rather different conditions carbonate formation is derived. It is generally accepted is accumulated. The aim of the present study is quite that cyanates decompose in aqueous solutions according different, namely to investigate the change of the compo- to the stoichiometric equations: sition of ammonium cyanate solution during prolonged - 2- + OCN + 2H2O → CO3 + NH4 (1) staying at ambient conditions. It is a continuation of our - + OCN + NH4 ↔ CO(NH2)2 (2) investigation of the reverse reaction, decomposition of The rate of conversion of ammonium cyanate into urea in a solution, presented in a previous paper [26]. urea is determined in the presence of added foreign salts [9, 21]. It is observed that the reaction rate decreases EXPERIMENTAL by salt addition. The negative catalysis becomes better expressed with the increase of added salt concentra- Materials tion. The higher the valency of one of the component AgNO3 and NH4Cl (p.a.) and for ions of the added salt, the more striking the retarding synthesis KOCN ≥ 97.0 % obtained from Merck were influence is. used in this investigation. The transformation of ammonium cyanate to urea can take place both in a solution and in a solid state. Two Procedures years after Wöhler’s discovery [1] Liebig and Wöhler Ammonim cyanate solution was prepared from [22] succeed to prepare ammonium cyanate as a fluffy, cyanate and ammonium chloride solution. Silver cyanate white powder by the direct union of dry ammonia and was precipitated by mixing solutions of silver and cyanic acid vapour. The powder can be kept essentially potassium cyanate, filtered, washed with distilled water unchanged in a sealed vessel under ammonia. When and dried. A suspension of silver cyanate in an aqueous exposed to air, the cyanate is converted into urea in solution of equivalent amount of ammonium chloride was the course of a few days, ammonia being continually agitated for 1 h until the solution was free of chloride ions. evolved during the transformation. Walker and Wood Silver cyanate had a very low solubility and the exchange [23] study the influence of the temperature on the rate into ammonium cyanate took place slowly, leaving behind of transformation of dry ammonium cyanate. An ex- solid silver chloride. After 50 min - 60 min the exchange periment with ordinary dry cyanate shows that 80 % of was complete (AgOCN + NH4Cl = NH4OCN + AgCl), the cyanate is converted into urea in the course of two and after filtering, the solution of ammonium cyanate hours at 333,15 K. Crystalline ammonium cyanate is was used. Solutions of ammonium cyanate were known synthesized by Dunitz et al. [24] by an exchange to undergo the isomeric change into urea at an appreciable between tetraethylammonium cyanate and ammonium rate, even at room temperature [27]. For this reason the . The authors determine that microcrystalline solution was analyzed within the next half an hour and ammonium cyanate transforms completely to micro- distributed in bottles. 100-ml samples of the solution were crystalline urea in the course of about 6 h at 323,15 K. transferred, by a pipette, to 120-ml plastic bottles which Tsipis and Karipidis [25] report a comprehensive were sealed and maintained at a constant temperature at study of the transformation of ammonium cyanate into 298.15 ± 0.5 K for 90 days. The bottles were removed at urea in a vacuum by means of first-principles quantum regular time intervals, and the contents analyzed by the chemical calculations. The synthesis of urea is predicted methods described in the sequel. Measurements of specific to proceed in two steps; the first step involves the de- conductivity, pH, and concentration of the species such composition of the ammonium cyanate to ammonia and as cyanate, urea, ammonim carbonate and ammonium isocyanic or cyanic acid, while the second one, which hydrogencarbonate in the solutions were carried. All data is the rate determining step, involves the interaction of reported here were mean values from 3 measurements.

NH3 with either isocyanic or cyanic acid. The literature review indicates that a controversy Methods and confusion concerning the mechanism of the trans- The electrolytic conductivity and pH were measured formation reaction of ammonium cyanate into urea in using a BOECO model conductometer and Mettler To- a solution still exists although much information about ledo pH meter FE 20. 873 Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 53, 5, 2018

The cyanate in the solution was analyzed by pre- cipitation as AgOCN [28]. For this purpose a solution of 0.1 M AgNO3 was added in excess to the sample for analysis. The hydrogen ion concentration was adjusted to pH 5.0 by adding dilute HNO3. pH meter was used. Under these conditions, all the silver carbonate (and , if any) was dissolved, while silver cyanate remained. The suspension was kept for 1 h at 278 K for decreasing the solubility of AgOCN. The precipitated silver cyanate was filtered off with Gooch crucible G4, washed 2 - 3 times with cold distilled water, dried for 1 h at 373 K, cooled in a desiccator and weighed. A spectrophotometric method for the determina- tion of urea concentration in the solution, described in Knorst’s work [29], was applied. The method was based on the development of a yellow color when an ethanolic Fig. 1. pH of 0.064 M ammonium cyanate solution as a solution of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde with dilute function of time at 298.15 K. mineral acid was added to urea.

The concentrations of NH4HCO3 and (NH4)2CO3 in the solution were determined by the direct alkalinity titration method [30]. The hydroxide alkalinity (OH-) was negligible in all analyzed samples. The amount of

(NH4)2CO3 was determined by titration with 0.01 M HCl to pH of 8.3. The end point was detected with - phthalein. The amount of NH4HCO3 was determined by S/cm

further titration to pH of 4.5. The end point was detected s, m with mixed bromcresol green-methyl red indicator.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The experimental data are presented in a graphic mode in Figs. 1 - 7. Fig. 1 illustrates pH change in the solution within the 90-day period at 298.15 K. The pH Fig. 2. Electrical conductivity of 0.064 M ammonium value increases gradually within the first 20 days fol- cyanate solution as a function of time at 298.15 K. lowed by a much slower increase approaching a final value of 9.18. The pH value of the solution depends on the conductance decreases as the reaction progresses. both, the ratio between the concentrations of NH4HCO3 The concentration of ammonium cyanate decreases and (NH4)2CO3, and the amounts of these components very rapidly within the first 10 days, followed by a very in the solution. slow, almost linear decrease to a final concentration A possible method of monitoring a reaction progress of 2.4 mmol L-1 (Fig. 3). Most of ammonium cyanate with electrolytes involvement is the measurement of the converts to urea, while a small fraction of it hydrolyzes solution electrical conductivity. Fig. 2 shows the elec- to ammonium . The degree of the overall trical conductivity of ammonium cyanate solution as a transformation of ammonium cyanate during 90 days function of time. The decrease in the electrical conduc- storage is calculated in accordance with: α = [(64 – tivity with time could be attributed to the spontaneous 2.4)/64]x100 = 96.3 %. According to Walker and Kay conversion of ammonium cyanate to urea. Since the ions [4] the quantity of ammonium cyanate remaining in the of ammonium cyanate form a neutral substance, urea, decinormal solution undergoing a complete transforma- 874 Mladen E. Lilov, Plamen P. Kirilov

Fig. 3. Change of ammonium cyanate concentration at Fig. 5. The accumulation of urea in 0.064 M ammonium 298.15 K over a period of 90 days. cyanate solution at 298.15 K over a period of 90 days.

Fig. 4. Ammonium cyanate concentration versus corre- Fig. 6. The accumulation of NH4HCO3 in 0.064 M am- sponding values of the conductivities at 298.15 K over a monium cyanate solution at 298.15 K over a period of period of 90 days. 90 days. tion at 305,15 K is 0.0032 mol L-1. This provides the the concentration of ammonium cyanate decreases calculation of the degree of conversion of ammonium considerably, and the concentration of NH4HCO3 and cyanate in correspondence with: α = [(0.1 – 0.0032)/0.1] (NH4)2CO3 increases. At this later stage the conductivity x100 = 96.8 %. of the solution is not due to ammonium cyanate alone According to Walker and Hambly [3] a half of the and hence the linearity is disrupted. decinormal ammonium cyanate is transformed within The curve presenting the urea accumulation in the 3 days at 298,15 K. solution is shown in Fig. 5. As expected, it is opposite to The concentration of ammonium cyanate is plotted the change of the concentration of ammonium cyanate. versus the corresponding value of the conductivity (Fig. The maximum urea level is 56.1 mmol L-1 at the end of 4). The plot is quite linear for the first 10 days. At this the investigated period. stage the presence of NH4HCO3 and (NH4)2CO3 in the The formation of urea from ammonium cyanate is solution is negligible. With the extent of the process accompanied by the formation, to a much smaller extent,

875 Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 53, 5, 2018

REFERENCES

1. F. Wöhler, Ueber künstliche Bildung des Harnstoffs.,Ann. Phys. Chem., 12, 1828, 253-256. 2. J. Shorter, The conversion of ammonium cyanate into urea - a saga in reaction mechanisms, Chem. Soc. Rev., 7, 1978, 1-14. 3. J. Walker, F.J. Hambly, Transformation of ammo- nium cyanate into urea, J. Chem. Soc., Trans. 67, 1895, 746-767. 4. J. Walker, S.A. Kay, Velocity of urea formation in aqueous , J. Chem. Soc., Trans. 71, 1897, 489-508. 5. E.E. Walker, Studies of the processes operative in solutions. XX. The conversion of ammonic cyanate Fig. 7. The accumulation of (NH ) CO in 0.064 M ammo- 4 2 3 into urea, especially as influenced by alcohols, Proc. nium cyanate solution at 298.15 K over a period of 90 days. R. Soc. Lond. A.87, 1912, 539-554. 6. F.D. Chattaway, The transformation of ammonium of NH4HCO3 and (NH4)2CO3 due to cyanate ions hy- cyanate into carbamide, J. Chem. Soc., Trans. 101, drolysis. The plots in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 show the changes 1912,170-173. of these products concentrations for up to 90 days. The 7. E.A. Werner, Mechanism of the transformation variations of NH4HCO3 and (NH4)2CO3 concentrations of ammonium cyanate into carbamide, and of the versus time differ. The concentration of NH4HCO3 decomposition of carbamide by heat, The polym- increases sharply within the first 10 days. Then it starts erization of cyanic acid, J. Chem. Soc., Trans. 103, to decrease. No ammonium carbonate is detected in the 1913, 1010-1022. solution within the first 5 days. This is followed by a 8. J.D.McB.Ross, The rate of transformation of am- considerable increase of (NH4)2CO3 accumulation with monium cyanate in absolute alcohol, J. Chem. Soc., time. It is obvious that even after 90 days storage of Trans., 105, 1914, 690-697. the solution the hydrolysis of ammonium cyanate will 9. J.C. Warner, F.B. Stitt, The conversion of ammonium continue to proceed although with a very small rate. cyanate into urea, Mechanism and kinetic salt effect, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 55, 1933, 4807-4812. CONCLUSIONS 10. C.C. Miller, J.R. Nicholson, The rates of transforma- tion in ethyl alchohol of ammonium and ethylam- The behavior of 0.064 M ammonium cyanate solu- monium cyanates to the corresponding , Proc. tion is studied at 298.15 K within 90 days. The pH value R. Soc. Lond. A.168,1938, 206-218. increases gradually due to the formation of NH4HCO3 11. E.A. Moelwyn-Hughes, The kinetics of certain and (NH4)2CO3. The spontaneous conversion of the bimolecular reactions in solution, Chem. Rev., 10, ammonium cyanate ions to a neutral substance, urea, 1931, 241-264. is accompanied by a sharp conductance decrease. Am- 12. J.C. Warner, E.L. Warrick, Kinetic medium and salt monium cyanate hydrolysis to NH4HCO3 and (NH4)2CO3 effects in reactions between ions of unlike sign. proceeds to a much smaller extent than that of its conver- Reaction between ammonium ion and cyanate ion, sion to urea. Both processes, those of conversion and J. Am. Chem. Soc., 57, 1935, 1491-1495. hydrolysis of ammonium cyanate proceed with much 13. W.J. Svirbely, J.C. Warner, The critical increment higher rates and to a much higher extent within the first of ionic reactions. Influence of dielectric constant 10 days - 15 days. The degree of the overall transfor- and ionic strength, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 57, 1935, mation of ammonium cyanate is found equal to 96.3 1883-1886. % during 90 days storage of the solution at 298.15 K. 14. W.J. Svirbely, A. Schramm, The critical increment 876 Mladen E. Lilov, Plamen P. Kirilov

of ionic reactions. II. The influence of dielectric säure, Ann. Phys. Chem., 96, 1830, 369-400. constant and ionic strength, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 60, 23. J. Walker, J.K. Wood, The preparation and properties 1938, 330-334. of solid ammonium cyanate, J. Chem. Soc., Trans., 15. J. Lander, W.J. Svirbely, The critical increment 67, 1900, 21-32. of ionic reactions. III. The influence of dielectric 24. J.D. Dunitz, K.D.M. Harris, R.L. Johnston, B.M. Ka- constant and ionic strength, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 60, riuki, E.J. MacLean, K. Psallidas, W.B. Schweizer, 1938, 1613-1617. R.R. Tykwinski, New light on an old story: the 16. L. Rampino, W.J. Svirbely, The critical increment solid-state transormation of ammonium cyanate into of ionic reactions. IV. The influence of dielectric urea., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 1998, 13274-13275. constant and ionic strength, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 61, 25. C.A. Tsipis, P.A. Karipidis, Mechanism of a chemi- 1939, 3534-3537. cal classic: quantum chemical investigation of the 17. W.J. Svirbely, J. Lander, The critical increment autocatalyzed reaction of the serendipitous Wöhler of ionic reactions. V. The influence of dielectric synthesis of urea, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125, 2003, constant and ionic strength, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 61, 2307-2318. 1939, 3538-3542. 26. M.E. Lilov, P.P. Kirilov, Decomposition of 8 M urea 18. W.J. Svirbely, S. Peterson, The rate of conversion of solution at 298.15 K, J. Solution Chem., 47, 2018, ammonium cyanate to urea in non-aqueous solvents. 930-938. VI. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 65, 1943, 166-170. 27. K.M. Birch, F. Schütz, Actions of cyanate, Brit. J. 19. P.A.H. Wyatt, H.L. Kornberg, Carbonate formation Pharmacol., 1, 1946, 186-193. during the isomerization of ammonium cyanate in 28. W.R. Fearon,Urease. Part I. The chemical changes unbuffered aqueous solution, Trans. Faraday Soc., involved in the zymolysis of urea, Biochem. J., 17, 48, 1952, 454-462. 1923, 84-93. 20. I.A. Kemp, G. Kohnstam, The decomposition of 29. M.T. Knorst, R.Neubert, W.Wohlrab, Analytical inorganic cyanates in water, J. Chem. Soc., 1956, methods for measuring urea in pharmaceutical 900-911. formulatons, J. Pharm. Biom. Anal., 15, 1997, 1627- 21. T. Okubo, N. Ise, Catalysis of the ammonium 1632. cyanate-urea conversion by polyelectrolytes, Proc. 30. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water R. Soc. Lond. A, 327, 1972, 413-424. and Wastewater, 22nd Ed., 2012, Method 2320B 22. J. Liebig, F. Wöhler, Untersuchugen über die Cyan- Titration Method, APHA, AWWA, WEF.

877