DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Did Jordanes Write the Getica?*,1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Did Jordanes Write the Getica?*,1 chapter 8 Why did Jordanes Write the Getica?*,1 Getica and Romana2 Jordanes tells us that he wrote the Getica3 because a friend asked him to pro- duce a shortened version of the Gothic History of Cassiodorus.4 We can believe him, but with one qualification—that this is not the whole story. After all, Jordanes was already profoundly interested in history: he was already at work writing a compendium of Roman History, which he had to interrupt to write the history of the Goths. His Roman History has a lengthy introduction which links the world of Greece and Rome with the events of the Bible, with the dat- ing provided by Jerome’s Chronicle. Jordanes therefore wrote secular history, but he located his secular history in a Christian framework. His historiography was up to date, like that of the nearly contemporary Chronicle of Malalas.5 One might also note that while the Getica is composed in the form of a narrative there is little attempt to produce a continuous story. It has some of the discon- tinuity of a chronicle, though it is not composed annalistically, and indeed very little concerned with chronology. * This article was previously published in Antiquité Tardive 19 (2011), pp. 295–302. 1 I want to thank Geoffrey Greatrex for helpful suggestions and corrections. He is not respon- sible for remaining errors. 2 Jordanes, Histoire de Rome de Romulus à Justinien 753 av. J.-C. à 552 apr. J.-C., suivie de L’Histoire des Goths, trad. H.A. Savagner & R. Fougères, Clermont Ferrand, 2002. 3 New text: F. Giunta and A. Grillone, Jordanes, De origine actibusque Getarum, Rome 1991. See also O. Devillers, Histoire des Goths, introd., trnsl., notes, Paris, 2005. 4 Getica 1: ut nostris verbis duodecem volumina Senatoris de origine actusque Getharum ab olim et usque nunc per generationes regesque coartem. On the identification of Getae and Gothi, see now C. Garcia, Godos y Getas en la historiagrafia de la tardoantigüedad, in Studia Historica: Historia Antigua, 22, 2004, pp. 179–296; also my Making a Gothic History, in Journal of Late Antiquity, 4.2, 2011 (in this volume 101–134). 5 E. Jeffreys, Malalas’ world view, in E. Jeffreys, B. Croke, R. Scott (dir.), Studies in John Malalas, Sydney, 1990, pp. 55–66. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���5 | doi ��.��63/9789004�895�9_009 136 chapter 8 The Getica and the Romana are parallel histories. Each is self-contained. There is very little overlap, and a letter to a certain Vigilius serves as an introduction to both treatises.6 They are not, however, a single work in that Jordanes has not revised the Getica to make its account consistent in detail with that of the Romana. There are a series of blatant mistakes in the Getica, which are not in the Romana. In the Getica, Jordanes fused the usurpers Maximus and Eugenius (Getica 145). He has Rome sacked by Athaulf as well as by Alaric (Getica 159–60). He situates the Vandal king Gaiseric in Spain already around 407 (Getica 153). He places the usurpations Constantine (ad 407) and Jovinus (ad 413) incorrectly (Getica 165) in the reign of the Visigothic king Vallia (ad 415–18). He already has the Vandal king Gaiseric in Africa in 416 (Getica 173), and attributes to Attila a second invasion of Gaul (ibid. 225–26). None of these errors is repeated in the Romana. Jordanes was working on the Romana when he was asked to write an epitome of Cassiodorus’ history of the Goths. So he interrupted work on the Romana to compile the Getica. He only then finished the Romana. The two books were completed in close succession: the latest event in each book hap- pened in 552.7 But since the Romana was finished last, it would have enabled Jordanes to correct some factual errors and omissions he had spotted in his earlier work, but he evidently did not go back to the Getica to correct those errors and omisssions. The Getica: Jordanes and Cassiodorus Jordanes’ two histories represent the two peoples, the Goths and the Romans as equals, not as equal in power, or in range of civilization, but as products of a long and glorious history. This perspective had not been created by Jordanes. It was already in the work of Cassiodorus which Jordanes was summarizing.8 6 W. Goffart, The Narrators of Barbarian History, Jordanes, Gregory of Tours, Bede and Paul the Deacon (AD 550–800), Princeton, 1988, pp. 20–111, makes the point that the two works comple- ment each other. To investigate the views about the world of Jordanes and his aims as writer we must look at both works. 7 Latest event in Getica: Liberius sent with an army to Spain (Getica 303) in spring 552 (see E. Stein, Histoire du Bas-Empire, 2, Paris, 1949, pp. 820ff.; J.A.S. Evans, The Age of Justinian, London, 1996, p. 180). Latest event in Romana: the defeat of the Gepids by the Lombards (Romana 386) in 552 (Proc. BG 4.25.14). Neither mentions the defeat and death of Totila in 552. B. Croke, Jordanes and the immediate past, in Historia, 54, 2005, pp. 473–94. 8 Cassiodorus had combined a sequence of narratives involving Scythians or Getae, drawn mainly from Greek historians, into a long excursus which he inserted into the meager .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Colonization of Tunisia
    1 History of Colonization of Tunisia INTRODUCTION History of the mankind is a rather interesting matter for study. Every nation in the world has its own history, and at the same time all nations are interconnected in the history in this or that way. All the events of the world’s history are recurrent and people of today should study history so that not to repeat the mistakes of past generations and avoid the difficulties they experienced. History of every nation in the world possesses its own tragic and glorious episodes. History is the combination of political, economic, social, military and religious events and processes that form the direction in which this or that nation develops. In this paper, the history of one country of African continent will be considered – the history of Tunisia and of colonization of this country by various nations (Balout vol. 1). The history of Tunisia is very complicated and filled with tragic moments of decline and glorious moments of power and influence. The epochs of Berber nation, Phoenician establishment of the first city-states on the territory of the modern Tunisia, Punic Wars and Roman conquest, Vandals, Byzantines and Ottomans, French colonization and, finally, the Independence of the country – all these stages of development of Tunisia are very important and influential for the shaping of the modern country (Balout vol. 1). The current paper will focus on all the most significant periods of the history of Tunisia with special attention paid to the political, social and military processes that affected the territory of the modern Tunisia in this or that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation
    Empire of Hope and Tragedy: Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brian Swain Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Timothy Gregory, Co-advisor Anthony Kaldellis Kristina Sessa, Co-advisor Copyright by Brian Swain 2014 Abstract This dissertation explores the intersection of political and ethnic conflict during the emperor Justinian’s wars of reconquest through the figure and texts of Jordanes, the earliest barbarian voice to survive antiquity. Jordanes was ethnically Gothic - and yet he also claimed a Roman identity. Writing from Constantinople in 551, he penned two Latin histories on the Gothic and Roman pasts respectively. Crucially, Jordanes wrote while Goths and Romans clashed in the imperial war to reclaim the Italian homeland that had been under Gothic rule since 493. That a Roman Goth wrote about Goths while Rome was at war with Goths is significant and has no analogue in the ancient record. I argue that it was precisely this conflict which prompted Jordanes’ historical inquiry. Jordanes, though, has long been considered a mere copyist, and seldom treated as an historian with ideas of his own. And the few scholars who have treated Jordanes as an original author have dampened the significance of his Gothicness by arguing that barbarian ethnicities were evanescent and subsumed by the gravity of a Roman political identity. They hold that Jordanes was simply a Roman who can tell us only about Roman things, and supported the Roman emperor in his war against the Goths.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Jordanes' Getica
    1004604 Assessing Jordanes’ Getica By Ferdinand Goetzen 1 1004604 Jordanes Seminar Paper The Origins and Deeds of the Goths, also known as Getica is not only the biggest but also the most disputed source when it comes to determining the origins and identity of the Barbarians. Written as an abridged version of Cassiodorius’ 12 volume History of the Goths in 551 by Jordanes, a retired Byzantine bureaucrat of Gothic descent, Getica has been subject to much dispute and controversy. Jordanes’ work on the Goths attempts to recount their history and noble legacy, from early beginnings in Scandinavia to their military fate endured at the hands of Justinian I. Given the circumstances in which both works were compiled, there is much disagreement as to how much of Getica reflects the true history and identity of the Goths. This paper intends to explain and assess the issues that revolve around Getica by analyzing the source itself as well as the theories of major scholars. Three factors must be taken into account when assessing the reliability of Getica as a historical source, the first being Cassiodorius’ intentions while writing his 12-volume History of the Goths. Cassiodorius’ intentions were not literary but political. It is suggested by Christensen and Goffart that his work is entirely fictitious1. Working as a roman nobleman under the rule of the Gothic King Theoderic, it is thought that Cassiodorius was commissioned or at least inspired to write a history of the Goths that would celebrate their long and noble legacy. Theoderic 1 Christiansen, A.S. (2002) Cassiodorus, Jordanes and the History of the Goths: Studies in a Migration Myth, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Suevic Kingdom Why Gallaecia?
    chapter 4 The Suevic Kingdom Why Gallaecia? Fernando López Sánchez The Sueves…(came to) hold the supremacy which the Vandals abandoned.1 Introduction: Towards a Re-evaluation of the Suevic Kingdom of Hispania During the reign of Rechiar (448–456) in the middle of the fifth century, the Sueves’ hegemony in Hispania seemed unassailable. Rechiar had inherited from his father, Rechila (438–448), a Suevic kingdom strong in Gallaecia and assertive across the Iberian Peninsula.2 By marrying a daughter of Theoderic I in 449, the new Suevic king won the support of the Visigothic rulers in Toulouse.3 As a Catholic, Rechiar managed to draw closer to the population of Hispania and also to Valentinian III, making himself, in a sense, a ‘modern’ monarch.4 In 453, he secured imperial backing through a pact with the imperial house of Ravenna.5 Confident in his power and prospects, Rechiar plundered Carthaginiensis and, finally, Tarraconensis, the last Spanish province under imperial control, following the deaths of Aëtius (454) and Valentinian III (455).6 1 Ubric (2004), 64. 2 For an analysis of Rechila’s ambitions and achievements: Pampliega (1998), 303–312. 3 Hyd. 132, pp. 98–99; Valverde (1999), 304. 4 Rechiar’s father, Rechila, died a pagan (gentilis), but Hydatius 129, pp. 98–99, describes Rechiar as catholicus at the time of his succession; see also Isidore of Seville, Historia Sueuorum 86–87, p. 301. Presumably, Rechila, his predecessor, Hermeric, and most of the Suevic aristocracy fol- lowed traditional German religious practices: Schäferdiek (1967), 108; García Moreno (1997), 200–201.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poems of Dracontius in Their Vandalic and Visigothic Contexts
    The Poems of Dracontius in their Vandalic and Visigothic Contexts Mark Lewis Tizzoni Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The University of Leeds, Institute for Medieval Studies September 2012 The candidate confinns that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2012 The University of Leeds and Mark Lewis Tizzoni The right of Mark Lewis Tizzoni to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Acknowledgements: There are a great many people to whom I am indebted in the researching and writing of this thesis. Firstly I would like to thank my supervisors: Prof. Ian Wood for his invaluable advice throughout the course of this project and his help with all of the historical and Late Antique aspects of the study and Mr. Ian Moxon, who patiently helped me to work through Dracontius' Latin and prosody, kept me rooted in the Classics, and was always willing to lend an ear. Their encouragement, experience and advice have been not only a great help, but an inspiration. I would also like to thank my advising tutor, Dr. William Flynn for his help in the early stages of the thesis, especially for his advice on liturgy and Latin, and also for helping to secure me the Latin teaching job which allowed me to have a roof over my head.
    [Show full text]
  • 72 *Arcadius (383-408) (East) 73 *Magnus Maximus
    375 Huns absorbed Greuthungi (Ostrogoths) 408 Huns captured Castra Martis (Romania) 431 Battle: Aetius/Salian Franks (France) 376 Tervingi (Visigoths) crossed Danube 408-413 Constantinople's landside wall built 431 1st Council of Ephesus (Nestorianism) 376 some Greuthungi crossed Danube 408-410 Alaric's 2nd Invasion of Italy [2/2] 431 Battle: Aetius/Norici (Noricum) 376-378 Valens Second Gothic War [5/6] 408 Stilicho executed 431-534 Vandal Kingdom (North Africa) 376 Battle: Marcianopolis (Bulgaria) 408.09-12 Alaric's first siege of Rome 431 Raid: central Hispania (Suebi) 377 Battle: Ad Salices (Bulgaria) 77 Constantine III (409-411) (W) 432 Battle: Vandals/Empire (Africa) 378.05 Battle: Argentovaria (France) 78 Constans II (409-411) (W) 432-439 Africa diocese overran by Vandals 378.08.09 Battle: Adrianople (Thracia) 409 Vandals, Alani, Suebi entered Hispania 432 B: Gaiseric/Bonifacius+Aspar (Algeria) 378 Siege: Constantinople (Thracia) 409 Battle: Alaric/Valens 432 Battle: Aetius/Salian Franks (France) 71 *Theodosius-I (379-395) (Eall) 409.10-11 Alaric's second siege of Rome 432 Battle: Ariminum (Italy) 379-382 Theodosius' Gothic War [6/6] 409 Siege: Ravenna (Italy) 432 Treaty: Suebi (Hispania) 380 Greuthungi settled in Pannonia 409-411 Usurper: Maximus of Hispania [1/2] 434 Battle: Vandals/Aspar (Africa) 380 Battle: Macedonia 410.08.24 Alaric's sack of Rome 434 Huns under Rua devastated Thrace 380 Edict of Thessalonica (Nicene Creed) 410 Romans abandon Britannia 434-469 Hunnic Empire 381 Council of Constantinople (Nicene 411 Conference of Carthage (Donatism) 434-453 Attila the Hun Creed) 411 Siege: Arles (France) 434 Huns settled in Pannonia (Hungary) 382 Treaty: Fritigern and the Tervingi 411-413 Usurper: Jovinus (Mainz) 435 Foundation of Constantinople University 382 Tervingi settled in Moesia Inferior 411-415 Ataulf (Visigoth) 435 Vandals took Mauretanias & Numidia 383-408 Stilicho 411-418 Silingi Vandals: Hispania Baetica 435 Treaty: Attila (Huns) 396 Battle: Greuthungi defeated 411-418 Alani: H.
    [Show full text]
  • HYPOTHESES on the LIFE of JORDANES Como Si De Esta Gente Yo Trazase Mi Origen: Hipótesis Sobre La Vida De Jordanes
    AS IF FROM THIS PEOPLE I TRACED MY ORIGIN AS IF FROM THIS PEOPLE I TRACED MY ORIGIN: HYPOTHESES ON THE LIFE OF JORDANES Como si de esta gente yo trazase mi origen: hipótesis sobre la vida de Jordanes OTÁVIO LUIZ VIEIRA PINTO UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS, REINO UNIDO [email protected] Introduction The De Origene actibusque Getarum, universally known as Getica, is one of the most well-known texts of the Early Middle Ages (Liebeschuetz, 2011; Bodelón, 2005; Amory, 2003; Christensen, 2002; Gillet, 2000; Weißensteiner, 1994; Bradley, Humanities Commons 1993; Goffart, 1988; Croke, 1987; O’Donnell,provided by 1982). It is View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk CORE brought to you by commonly regarded as one of the first accounts on the pre-Roman history of a barbarian gens – in this case, the Goths – written by a non-Roman, known as Jordanes (Wolfram, 1990: 27). In this sense, the Getica is a valuable text for scholars looking into ethnical traditions and cultural frameworks that might have been TAVIO UIZ IEIRA INTO O L V P , “As if from this People I Traced my Origin: Hypotheses on the Life of Jordanes”, Calamus 1 (2017): 197-222. ISSN 2545-627X. Recibido 15/11/2015, aceptado 04/05/2016 197 OTÁVIO VIEIRA PINTO lost or ignored by Roman authors, centred in their own cultural and literary scopes.1 In the past decades, the Getica sparkled countless historiographical debates concerning its factual accuracy, its general purpose and its effectiveness in dealing with veridical Gothic matters.2 Because it was written as Justinian was finishing – and winning – his campaign against the Ostrogoths in Italy, some researchers, such as Walter Goffart, saw in it a propagandistic tone, whose value was embedded in a contextual setup rather than a proper historical narrative (Goffart, 1988: 20- 111).
    [Show full text]
  • Roman History the LEGENDARY PERIOD of the KINGS (753
    Roman History THE LEGENDARY PERIOD OF THE KINGS (753 - 510 B.C.) Rome was said to have been founded by Latin colonists from Alba Longa, a nearby city in ancient Latium. The legendary date of the founding was 753 B.C.; it was ascribed to Romulus and Remus, the twin sons of the daughter of the king of Alba Longa. Later legend carried the ancestry of the Romans back to the Trojans and their leader Aeneas, whose son Ascanius, or Iulus, was the founder and first king of Alba Longa. The tales concerning Romulus’s rule, notably the rape of the Sabine women and the war with the Sabines, point to an early infiltration of Sabine peoples or to a union of Latin and Sabine elements at the beginning. The three tribes that appear in the legend of Romulus as the parts of the new commonwealth suggest that Rome arose from the amalgamation of three stocks, thought to be Latin, Sabine, and Etruscan. The seven kings of the regal period begin with Romulus, from 753 to 715 B.C.; Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, from 534 to 510 B.C., the seventh and last king, whose tyrannical rule was overthrown when his son ravished Lucretia, the wife of a kinsman. Tarquinius was banished, and attempts by Etruscan or Latin cities to reinstate him on the throne at Rome were unavailing. Although the names, dates, and events of the regal period are considered as belonging to the realm of fiction and myth rather than to that of factual history, certain facts seem well attested: the existence of an early rule by kings; the growth of the city and its struggles with neighboring peoples; the conquest of Rome by Etruria and the establishment of a dynasty of Etruscan princes, symbolized by the rule of the Tarquins; the overthrow of this alien control; and the abolition of the kingship.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference and Accommodation in Visigothic Gaul and Spain
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Spring 2010 Difference and Accommodation in Visigothic Gaul and Spain Craig H. Schamp San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Schamp, Craig H., "Difference and Accommodation in Visigothic Gaul and Spain" (2010). Master's Theses. 3789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.26vu-jqpq https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3789 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIFFERENCE AND ACCOMMODATION IN VISIGOTHIC GAUL AND SPAIN A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Craig H. Schamp May 2010 © 2010 Craig H. Schamp ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled DIFFERENCE AND ACCOMMODATION IN VISIGOTHIC GAUL AND SPAIN by Craig H. Schamp APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY May 2010 Dr. John W. Bernhardt Department of History Dr. Jonathan P. Roth Department of History Dr. Nancy P. Stork Department of English and Comparative Literature ABSTRACT DIFFERENCE AND ACCOMMODATION IN VISIGOTHIC GAUL AND SPAIN by Craig H. Schamp This thesis examines primary sources in fifth- and sixth-century Gaul and Spain and finds a surprising lack of concern for ethnicity.
    [Show full text]
  • IFRIQAYA Notes for a Tour of Northern Africa in September-October 2011
    IFRIQAYA notes for a tour of northern Africa in September-October 2011 Miles Lewis Cover illustration: the Castellum of Kaoua. Gsell, Monuments Antiques, I, p 105. CONTENTS Preamble 5 History 6 Modern Algeria 45 Modern Tunisia 58 Modern Libya 65 Timeline 65 Pre-Roman Architecture 72 Greek & Roman Architecture 75 Christian Architecture 87 Islamic Architecture 98 Islamic and Vernacular Building Types 100 Pisé and Concrete 102 The Entablature and Dosseret Block 104 Reconstruction of the Classical Language 107 LIBYA day 1: Benghazi 109 day 2: the Pentapolis 110 day 3: Sabratha 118 day 4: Lepcis Magna & the Villa Sileen 123 day 5: Ghadames 141 day 6: Nalut, Kabaw, Qasr-el-Haj 142 day 7: Tripoli 144 TUNISIA day 8: Tunis & Carthage 150 day 9: the Matmata Plateau 160 day 10: Sbeitla; Kairouan 167 day 11: El Jem 181 day 12: Cap Bon; Kerkouane 184 day 13: rest day – options 187 day 14: Thuburbo Majus; Dougga 190 day 15: Chemtou; Bulla Regia; Tabarka 199 ALGERIA day 16: Ain Drahram; cross to Algeria; Hippo 201 day 17: Hippo; Tiddis; Constantine 207 day 18: Tébessa 209 day 19: Timgad; Lambaesis 214 day 20: Djémila 229 day 21: Algiers 240 day 22: Tipasa & Cherchell 243 day 23: Tlemcen 252 Ifriqaya 5 PREAMBLE This trip is structured about but by no means confined to Roman sites in North Africa, specifically today’s Libya, Tunisia and Algeria. But we look also at the vernacular, the Carthaginian, the Byzantine and the early Islamic in the same region. In the event the war in Libya has forced us to omit that country from the current excursion, though the notes remain here.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rome and Early Christianity, 500 B.C.-A.D. 500
    Ancient Rome and Early Christianity, 500 B.C.-A.D. 500 Previewing Main Ideas POWER AND AUTHORITY Rome began as a republic, a government in which elected officials represent the people. Eventually, absolute rulers called emperors seized power and expanded the empire. Geography About how many miles did the Roman Empire stretch from east to west? EMPIRE BUILDING At its height, the Roman Empire touched three continents—Europe, Asia, and Africa. For several centuries, Rome brought peace and prosperity to its empire before its eventual collapse. Geography Why was the Mediterranean Sea important to the Roman Empire? RELIGIOUS AND ETHICAL SYSTEMS Out of Judea rose a monotheistic, or single-god, religion known as Christianity. Based on the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth, it soon spread throughout Rome and beyond. Geography What geographic features might have helped or hindered the spread of Christianity throughout the Roman Empire? INTERNET RESOURCES • Interactive Maps Go to classzone.com for: • Interactive Visuals • Research Links • Maps • Interactive Primary Sources • Internet Activities • Test Practice • Primary Sources • Current Events • Chapter Quiz 152 153 What makes a successful leader? You are a member of the senate in ancient Rome. Soon you must decide whether to support or oppose a powerful leader who wants to become ruler. Many consider him a military genius for having gained vast territory and wealth for Rome. Others point out that he disobeyed orders and is both ruthless and devious. You wonder whether his ambition would lead to greater prosperity and order in the empire or to injustice and unrest. ▲ This 19th-century painting by Italian artist Cesare Maccari shows Cicero, one of ancient Rome’s greatest public speakers, addressing fellow members of the Roman Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western World Was Saved at the Battle of Chalons, 451 AD by Walter S
    The Western World was saved at the Battle of Chalons, 451 AD By Walter S. Zapotoczny The Battle of Chalons, also called the Battle of the Catalaunian Fields or the Battle of the Catalun, is considered by many historians as one of the most significant battles in history. It occurred in 451 AD somewhere in the western part of present-day France. Edward Creasy in his book Fifteen Decisive Battles of the World states: “…the battle not only rescued for a time from destruction the old age of Rome, but preserved for centuries of power and glory the Germanic element in the civilization of modern Europe.” The clash at Chalons was a monumental conflict. It pitted two of the towering figures of Late Antiquity, the fierce Attila the Hun, and the noble Roman Flavius Aetius against each other. If Flavius had not been successful in holding back the Hun invasion, the whole course of Western history might have been changed. The Huns were fearsome nomadic horsemen from the steppes of Central Asia. They originated as tribes who routinely raided and pillaged their neighbors, and each other. The Huns were wanderers, who did not understand the concept of civilization or agriculture. In order to survive, they moved in small groups over large areas from grazing ground to grazing ground. They often blindly plundered and destroyed everything. The barbarians not only ruined countless cities and villages of Central Asia, they also stripped the steppe land itself. They uprooted trees and bushes for firewood, which promoted drift-sand. For undetermined generations their herds and flocks of cattle, horses, goats, and sheep were driven over the steppes of central and southern Siberia.
    [Show full text]