DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing Jordanes' Getica

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1004604 Assessing Jordanes’ Getica By Ferdinand Goetzen 1 1004604 Jordanes Seminar Paper The Origins and Deeds of the Goths, also known as Getica is not only the biggest but also the most disputed source when it comes to determining the origins and identity of the Barbarians. Written as an abridged version of Cassiodorius’ 12 volume History of the Goths in 551 by Jordanes, a retired Byzantine bureaucrat of Gothic descent, Getica has been subject to much dispute and controversy. Jordanes’ work on the Goths attempts to recount their history and noble legacy, from early beginnings in Scandinavia to their military fate endured at the hands of Justinian I. Given the circumstances in which both works were compiled, there is much disagreement as to how much of Getica reflects the true history and identity of the Goths. This paper intends to explain and assess the issues that revolve around Getica by analyzing the source itself as well as the theories of major scholars. Three factors must be taken into account when assessing the reliability of Getica as a historical source, the first being Cassiodorius’ intentions while writing his 12-volume History of the Goths. Cassiodorius’ intentions were not literary but political. It is suggested by Christensen and Goffart that his work is entirely fictitious1. Working as a roman nobleman under the rule of the Gothic King Theoderic, it is thought that Cassiodorius was commissioned or at least inspired to write a history of the Goths that would celebrate their long and noble legacy. Theoderic 1 Christiansen, A.S. (2002) Cassiodorus, Jordanes and the History of the Goths: Studies in a Migration Myth, pp. 7-10 2 1004604 was a successful ruler and the motor behind the Roman-Gothic rapprochement. In order to enjoy the same respect as Roman noble and royal families, he would have needed Cassiodorius to prove the worthiness of his Amali heritage and his fitness to rule2. It therefore doesn’t seem that Cassiodorius’ motivations were in line with an accurate portrayal of Gothic history, it is rather suggested that much of his work is false and fictitious. Wolfram would argue that there is a kernel of truth to be found when analyzing things like ethnic terminology, but Danish historian Christensen would disagree, claiming the entire work to be fictitious and based on ancient Greek and Roman Myths3. The second factor is Jordanes’ reliability and the extent to which he remained faithful to Cassiodorus’ original text. In the mid-6th century, Jordanes’ was commissioned to abridge the 12-volume History of the Goths. The original text no longer exists, which has led to much discussion on how faithful Jordanes was to it. Many mythical claims have been rejected and even the more realistic elements, such as the Gothic origins in Scandinavia4, are highly debated by the likes of Wolfram and Goffart5. Getica certainly doesn’t seem consistent in its method and style, making it a misleading source at times. Jordanes’ himself admits that he did not have the original texts by Cassiodorius’ at his disposal when writing Getica. He instead based his writing on the memory 2 Goffart, W. (2005) Jordanes' "Getica" and the Disputed Authenticity of Gothic Origins from Scandinavia […], pp. 395-6 3 Christiansen, A.S. (2002) Cassiodorus, Jordanes and the History of the Goths […], pp. 33-35 & 52- 55 4 Jordanes (1915) The Origin and Deeds of the Goths, XVII (94) 5 Goffart, W. (1988) The narrators of barbarian history (A.D. 550-800): Jordanes, Gregory of Tours, Bede, and Paul the Deacon, pp. 58-59 3 1004604 of his last reading of the History of the Goths when he took the books out on a 3- day loan6. Pairing his original writing with other Greek and Roman writings from the likes of Priscus7, Jordanes’ claims to have complimented and summarized Cassiodorius’ work. Goffart argues that though he does not claim originality for the work, much of it is plagiarized and badly referenced, as well as often being inaccurate. The appearance of 6th century ethnic names for example, suggests that there is some discrepancy between the original sources and Jordanes’ account. With only 3 days to study the 12 volumes and likely no intention at the time to summarize them, it seems doubtful that Jordanes would have remembered much8. Many have argued about whether it is possible to detach Jordanes’ writing from that of Cassiodorus. His use of other scholars suggests that he is not inventing the story9, but without Cassiodorus’ original work, there is no proof. Analyzing Cassiodorius’ style can be useful in determining what parts stem from his work, but a complete separation is impossible according to Goffart10. Nevertheless, Croke argues that one can differentiate between Jordanes’ and Cassiodorius’ style, which has allowed for historians to establish the original intention of Cassiodorius’ work. For example, it is known that Jordanes’ blindly accepts Cassiodorius’ claim that the Goths were identical to the Getae and identified with the Scythians11. 6 Jordanes (1915) The Origin and Deeds of the Goths, Preface (2-3) 7 Ibid, XXXIV (178) 8 Goffart, W. (1988) The narrators of barbarian history (A.D. 550-800) […], p. 59 9 Jordanes (1915) The Origin and Deeds of the Goths, Preface (3) 10 Goffart, W. (2005) Jordanes' "Getica" and the Disputed Authenticity of Gothic Origins from Scandinavia […], p. 386 11 Croke, B. (1987) Cassiodorus and the Getica of Jordanes, p. 119 4 1004604 Similarly to Croke, Wolfram believes that Jordanes’ work is based on that of Cassiodorus and can teach us about the Origo Gothica12. Goffart and Croke strongly disagree about the reliability and competence of Jordanes13. The final factor is Jordanes‘ motivations for writing Getica. Though a clear supporter of Justinian’s rule, Jordanes’ views do at times seem biased towards the Goths. He praises Alaric’s restraint at the Sack of Rome14 and is quick to criticize Romans such as Stilicho and his attack on the Goths at Pollentia15. This suggests that despite his views on the Byzantine conquest of the Goths, Jordanes had hopes for reconciliation. He does after all briefly mention his Gothic origins and his connection to the Amali family16. It is therefore understandable why Jordanes would want the Goths to have a respectable image, even if he supported Justinian’s conquering and conversion of them17. Goffart however argues that Jordanes had quite dubious origins and that very little suggests that he would have identified with the Goths. Jordanes even requests in his text that his origins not make him seem biased18. This leads Goffart to assert that, “Jordanes' compilation of the Getica was part of […] the elimination of Gothic rule”. He believes, that at a time where Byzantium had the Goths on the verge of surrender, it would have been beneficial for Justinian to discredit the work that promoted the nobility and legitimacy of the Gothic 12 Goffart, W. (2005) Jordanes' "Getica" and the Disputed Authenticity of Gothic Origins from Scandinavia […], p. 383 13 Croke, B. (1987) Cassiodorus and the Getica of Jordanes, pp. 117-20 14 Jordanes (1915) The Origin and Deeds of the Goths, XXX (155-8) 15 Croke, B. (1987) Cassiodorus and the Getica of Jordanes, p. 125 16 Jordanes (1915) The Origin and Deeds of the Goths, L (266) 17 Croke, B. (1987) Cassiodorus and the Getica of Jordanes, p. 127 18 Goffart, W. (1988) The narrators of barbarian history (A.D. 550-800) […], pp. 42-3 5 1004604 people. Goffart believes that Jordanes was commissioned to “[bring] Cassiodorus's history into harmony with what Justinian had done to the Gothic kingdom”. Jordanes’ strong identification with the Roman Empire and the Catholic Church would explain his willingness to abridge the volumes19. Another explanation, when reading Jordanes’ conclusion20, could be that he wanted to preserve the view of the Goths as a noble and powerful people in order to make Justinian’s impending victory over them seem more glorious. When analyzing Jordanes’ Getica and the historical arguments that surround it, it becomes clear how unique and controversial the text is. Though difficult to determine truth from myth and Jordanes from Cassiodorius, it seems rash to discard the entirety of Getica as fiction, as Christensen and Goffart would. Croke takes a skeptical approach, but like Wolfram, believes that a proper analysis of the text can reveal ‘snippets of information’ about the Goths’ true origins and identity. 19 Goffart, W. (2005) Jordanes' "Getica" and the Disputed Authenticity of Gothic Origins from Scandinavia […], pp. 395-6 20 Jordanes (1915) The Origin and Deeds of the Goths, Conclusion (315-316) 6 1004604 Bibliography Croke, B. (1987) Cassiodorus and the Getica of Jordanes, ‘Classical Philology Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 117-134’, Chicago: University of Chicago Press Goffart, W. (1988) The narrators of barbarian history (A.D. 550-800): Jordanes, Gregory of Tours, Bede, and Paul the Deacon, Princeton: Princeton University Press Goffart, W. (2005) Jordanes' "Getica" and the Disputed Authenticity of Gothic Origins from Scandinavia, ‘Speculum, Vol. 80, No. 2 (Apr., 2005), pp. 379-398’, Cambridge: The Medieval Academy of America Jordanes (1915) The Origin and Deeds of the Goths, Translated by Charles C. Mierow [Online: University of Calgary]. Available at http://people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/jordgeti.html [Last Accessed 22 October 2013] Christiansen, A.S. (2002) Cassiodorus, Jordanes and the History of the Goths: Studies in a Migration Myth, Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum 7 .
Recommended publications
  • Byzantine Narratives of Gender Identity Eamon H.R

    Byzantine Narratives of Gender Identity Eamon H.R

    Introduction ix Roger Scott xv Ann Moffatt (Australian National University) List of 11 lustrations xix KEYNOTE PAPERS Novelisation in Byzantium: Narrative after the Revival of 1 Fiction Margaret Mullett (The Queen 's University Belfast) Narrating Justinian: From Malalas to Manasses 29 Roger Scott (University of Melbourne) NARRATIVE IN HISTORIANS, CHRONICLES & FICTION To Narrate the Events of the Past: On Byzantine 47 Historians, and Historians on Byzantium Ingela Nilsson (Uppsala University) Tradition and Originality in Photius' Historical Reading 59 Brian Crake (Sydney) Narrating the Trials and Death in Exile of Pope Martin I 71 and Maxim us the Confessor Bronwen Neil (Australian Catholic University) The Use of Metaphor in Michael Psellos' Chronographia 84 Elizabeth McCartney (University of Melbourne) War and Peace in the Alexiad 92 Penelope Buckley (University of Melbourne) Moralising History: the Synopsis Historiarum of John 110 Skylitzes Theoni Sklavos (University of Melbourne) The Representation of Augustae in John Skylitzes' 120 Synopsis Historiarum Emma Strugnell (University of Melbourne) The Madrid Skylitzes as an Audio-Visual Experiment 137 John Burke (University of Melbourne) The Goths and the Bees in Jordanes: A Narrative of No 149 Return Andrew Gillett (Macquarie University) From 'Fallen Woman' to Theotokos: Music, Women's 164 Voices and Byzantine Narratives of Gender Identity Eamon H.R. Kelly (St Cross College, Oxford) How the Entertaining Tale of Quadrupeds became a Tale: 182 Grafting Narrative Nick Nicholas (University of
  • Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation

    Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation

    Empire of Hope and Tragedy: Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brian Swain Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Timothy Gregory, Co-advisor Anthony Kaldellis Kristina Sessa, Co-advisor Copyright by Brian Swain 2014 Abstract This dissertation explores the intersection of political and ethnic conflict during the emperor Justinian’s wars of reconquest through the figure and texts of Jordanes, the earliest barbarian voice to survive antiquity. Jordanes was ethnically Gothic - and yet he also claimed a Roman identity. Writing from Constantinople in 551, he penned two Latin histories on the Gothic and Roman pasts respectively. Crucially, Jordanes wrote while Goths and Romans clashed in the imperial war to reclaim the Italian homeland that had been under Gothic rule since 493. That a Roman Goth wrote about Goths while Rome was at war with Goths is significant and has no analogue in the ancient record. I argue that it was precisely this conflict which prompted Jordanes’ historical inquiry. Jordanes, though, has long been considered a mere copyist, and seldom treated as an historian with ideas of his own. And the few scholars who have treated Jordanes as an original author have dampened the significance of his Gothicness by arguing that barbarian ethnicities were evanescent and subsumed by the gravity of a Roman political identity. They hold that Jordanes was simply a Roman who can tell us only about Roman things, and supported the Roman emperor in his war against the Goths.
  • HYPOTHESES on the LIFE of JORDANES Como Si De Esta Gente Yo Trazase Mi Origen: Hipótesis Sobre La Vida De Jordanes

    HYPOTHESES on the LIFE of JORDANES Como Si De Esta Gente Yo Trazase Mi Origen: Hipótesis Sobre La Vida De Jordanes

    AS IF FROM THIS PEOPLE I TRACED MY ORIGIN AS IF FROM THIS PEOPLE I TRACED MY ORIGIN: HYPOTHESES ON THE LIFE OF JORDANES Como si de esta gente yo trazase mi origen: hipótesis sobre la vida de Jordanes OTÁVIO LUIZ VIEIRA PINTO UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS, REINO UNIDO [email protected] Introduction The De Origene actibusque Getarum, universally known as Getica, is one of the most well-known texts of the Early Middle Ages (Liebeschuetz, 2011; Bodelón, 2005; Amory, 2003; Christensen, 2002; Gillet, 2000; Weißensteiner, 1994; Bradley, Humanities Commons 1993; Goffart, 1988; Croke, 1987; O’Donnell,provided by 1982). It is View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk CORE brought to you by commonly regarded as one of the first accounts on the pre-Roman history of a barbarian gens – in this case, the Goths – written by a non-Roman, known as Jordanes (Wolfram, 1990: 27). In this sense, the Getica is a valuable text for scholars looking into ethnical traditions and cultural frameworks that might have been TAVIO UIZ IEIRA INTO O L V P , “As if from this People I Traced my Origin: Hypotheses on the Life of Jordanes”, Calamus 1 (2017): 197-222. ISSN 2545-627X. Recibido 15/11/2015, aceptado 04/05/2016 197 OTÁVIO VIEIRA PINTO lost or ignored by Roman authors, centred in their own cultural and literary scopes.1 In the past decades, the Getica sparkled countless historiographical debates concerning its factual accuracy, its general purpose and its effectiveness in dealing with veridical Gothic matters.2 Because it was written as Justinian was finishing – and winning – his campaign against the Ostrogoths in Italy, some researchers, such as Walter Goffart, saw in it a propagandistic tone, whose value was embedded in a contextual setup rather than a proper historical narrative (Goffart, 1988: 20- 111).
  • Honorius, Galla Placidia, and the Struggles for Control of the Western Roman Empire, 405-425 C.E

    Honorius, Galla Placidia, and the Struggles for Control of the Western Roman Empire, 405-425 C.E

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2013 Crisis of Legitimacy: Honorius, Galla Placidia, and the Struggles for Control of the Western Roman Empire, 405-425 C.E. Thomas Christopher Lawrence [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Lawrence, Thomas Christopher, "Crisis of Legitimacy: Honorius, Galla Placidia, and the Struggles for Control of the Western Roman Empire, 405-425 C.E.. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1751 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Thomas Christopher Lawrence entitled "Crisis of Legitimacy: Honorius, Galla Placidia, and the Struggles for Control of the Western Roman Empire, 405-425 C.E.." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Michael E. Kulikowski, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Christine Shepardson, Maura Lafferty, Thomas Burman Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Crisis of Legitimacy: Honorius, Galla Placidia, and the Struggles for Control of the Western Roman Empire, 405-425 C.E.
  • Scythia As Reflected by Iordanes (Jordanes): a Scene from the Sixth Century

    Scythia As Reflected by Iordanes (Jordanes): a Scene from the Sixth Century

    Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi XXXV / 1, 2020, 297-332 DOI: 10.18513/egetid.770004 SCYTHIA AS REFLECTED BY IORDANES (JORDANES): A SCENE FROM THE SIXTH CENTURY Abdullah ÜSTÜN** Abstract This study focuses on Scythia, Iordanes’ Scythia, as depicted in his work entitled Getica. The first question of the study is how Iordanes saw Scythia. Although his records about physical geography are discussed here, the main focus will be on his descriptions of human geography/ethnography. In his human geography narratives, emphasis will be on Eastern Scythia tribes such as the Huns and the Bulgars which have been less emphasized in the previous studies. The second question of the study is where Scythia is according to Iordanes. Therefore, the way that Iordanes positions Scythia will be discussed in order to gain insight into his perception of Scythia. These processes will be included comparisons with Iordanes' other work Romana and other texts written before him and or by his contemporaries. In this way, the examination is expected to contribute to our understanding of Iordanes’ text and the geographical and the historical knowledge in the sixth century. Keywords: Iordanes (Jordanes), Getica, Scythia, Huns, Bulgars, Acatziri, Historical geography. Öz Iordanes’in Gözünden Scythia: Altıncı Yüzyıldan Bir Sahne Bu çalışma Iordanes’in Getica adlı eserinde tasvir ettiği Scythia’yı, Iordanes’in Scythia’sını konu edinmektedir. Çalışmanın ilk sorusu, Iordanes’in nazarında Scythia’nın nasıl bir yer olduğudur. Burada fiziki coğrafya hakkındaki kayıtları ele alınmakla birlikte asıl ilgi beşerî coğrafya, etnografya tasvirlerinde olacaktır. Beşerî coğrafya anlatıları içinde, araştırmalarda daha az üzerinde durulan, Hun, Bulgar gibi Doğu Scythia kabileleri daha ön planda tutulacaktır.
  • Integrating Magna Dacia. a N Arrative Reappraisal Of

    Integrating Magna Dacia. a N Arrative Reappraisal Of

    INTEGRATING MAGNA DACIA. A NARRATIVE REAPPRAISAL OF JORDANES OTÁVIO LUIZ VIEIRA PINTO SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS SCHOOL OF HISTORY SEPTEMBER 2016 ii iii The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Otávio Luiz Vieira Pinto to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2016 The University of Leeds and Otávio Luiz Vieira Pinto iv Al contrario, rispondo, chi siamo noi, chi è ciascuno di noi se non una combinatoria d'esperienze, d'informazioni, di letture, d'immaginazioni? Ogni vita è un'enciclopedia, una biblioteca, un inventario d'oggetti, un campionario di stili, dove tutto può essere continuamente rimescolato e riordinato in tutti i modi possibili. Italo Calvino, Lezioni Americane. […] his own proper person was a riddle to unfold; a wondrous work in one volume; but whose mysteries not even himself could read, though his own live heart beat against them; and these mysteries were therefore destined in the end to moulder away with the living parchment whereon they were inscribed, and so be unsolved to the last. Herman Melville, Moby Dick. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS When I crossed the Atlantic to start my doctoral research, I had no real dimension of how much certain people in my life would be fundamental to the completion of this thesis – and to go through, with head held high, the 4-year long process that it entailed.
  • Who Were the Eruli?

    Who Were the Eruli?

    © Scandia 2008 www.scandia.hist.lu.se ABvar Elkgird Who were the Eruli? I. The received view In practically all the standard handbooks covering the history of the Germanic tribes,' the Eruli, or Heruli2 are represented as originating somewhere in Scan- dinavia. Thus A. kippold in Der Kleine Pauly (1967) describes them as a Ger- manic tribe, expelled from Scandinavia by the Danes around A.D. 250. In all es- sentials Lippold agrees with B. Rappaport's long article in the unabridged Pau- lys Real-Encyklopadie, 2nd ed. 1913. The same general picture emerges from the shorter and much less specific ar- ticle by R. Much in Hoops' Reallexikon der germanischen Altertumskunde, 2nd ed. 1913. The Eruli are said to have had their original home ("Stamrnsitz") in Scandinavia. Following the sixth-century historian Jordanes, Much declares that the EruIi were driven out by the Danes. After this, part of the tribe settled somewhere in northwest Germany, from where they made an abortive incursion into Gau'l in 287. Another part of the tribe, says Much, accompanied the Goths to the region north of the Black Sea. Much also refers to a very detailed story by the sixth century Greek historian Prokopios, in which a group of Eruli, led by members of their royal family, made a long trek from 1llyricu.m to Scandinavia some time in the beginning of the sixth century. This is described by Much as a "return" ("Riickwanderung") of the tribe to their ancestral home. One of the standard works on the history of the ancient Germanic tribes, by Ludwig Schmidt, has the same story and the same interpretation, both in the first edition (1910) and in the second (1933).
  • The Gothic History of Jordanes in English Version;

    The Gothic History of Jordanes in English Version;

    THE GOTHIC HISTORY OF JORDANES IN ENGLISH VERSION WITH AN INTRODUCTION AND A COMMENTARY BY CHARLES CHRISTOPHER MIEROW, Ph.D. Instructor in Classics in Princeton University V 3 1^ 1^ (i PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON LONDON: HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1915 Copyright, 1915, by Charles Christopher Mierow Published, February, 1915 PREFACE This edition of the Getica of Jordanes is based ERRATA p PREFACE This edition of the Getica of Jordanes is based upon the authoritative text and critical apparatus of Mommsen as found in the Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Auc- fores Antiqiiissimi 5 (Berhn 1882), with other material added. I have adhered closely to his spelling of proper names, especially Gothic names, except in a few words which are of common use in another form. I have care- fully reviewed all the existing evidence on controverted points, dissenting in several instances from the conclu- sions of Mommsen, particularly in regard to the sup- posedly Gothic writer Ahlabius, the ecclesiastical status of Jordanes, and the place of composition of the Getica. For the Latinity of Jordanes the studies of E. Wolfflin (Arch. f. lat. Lex. 11, 361), J. Bergmiiller (Augsburg 1903), and Fritz Werner (Halle 1908) have been con- sulted, and for ready convenience of illustration in his- torical matters frequent reference is made in the com- mentary to Hodgkin's "Italy and Her Invaders" (2nd. edition. Clarendon Press, 1892), Gibbon's "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" (edited by J. B. Bury, London 1896), Bury's "History of the Later Roman Empire" (MacMillan & Co., 1889), and "The Cambridge JVIedieval History" (The MacMillan Co., New York 1911).
  • Download Free at ISBN 978‑1‑909646‑72‑8 (PDF Edition) DOI: 10.14296/917.9781909646728

    Download Free at ISBN 978‑1‑909646‑72‑8 (PDF Edition) DOI: 10.14296/917.9781909646728

    Ravenna its role in earlier medieval change and exchange Ravenna its role in earlier medieval change and exchange Edited by Judith Herrin and Jinty Nelson LONDON INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Published by UNIVERSITY OF LONDON SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU First published in print in 2016 (ISBN 978‑1‑909646‑14‑8) This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution‑ NonCommercial‑NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY‑ NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities‑digital‑library.org ISBN 978‑1‑909646‑72‑8 (PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/917.9781909646728 iv Contents Acknowledgements vii List of contributors ix List of illustrations xiii Abbreviations xvii Introduction 1 Judith Herrin and Jinty Nelson 1. A tale of two cities: Rome and Ravenna under Gothic rule 15 Peter Heather 2. Episcopal commemoration in late fifth‑century Ravenna 39 Deborah M. Deliyannis 3. Production, promotion and reception: the visual culture of Ravenna between late antiquity and the middle ages 53 Maria Cristina Carile 4. Ravenna in the sixth century: the archaeology of change 87 Carola Jäggi 5. The circulation of marble in the Adriatic Sea at the time of Justinian 111 Yuri A. Marano 6. Social instability and economic decline of the Ostrogothic community in the aftermath of the imperial victory: the papyri evidence 133 Salvatore Cosentino 7. A striking evolution: the mint of Ravenna during the early middle ages 151 Vivien Prigent 8. Roman law in Ravenna 163 Simon Corcoran 9.
  • The Making of the Slavs: History and Archaeology of the Lower Danube

    The Making of the Slavs: History and Archaeology of the Lower Danube

    The Making of the Slavs This book offers a new approach to the problem of Slavic ethnicity in south- eastern Europe between c. and c. , from the perspective of current anthropological theories. The conceptual emphasis here is on the relation between material culture and ethnicity. The author demonstrates that the history of the Sclavenes and the Antes begins only at around . He also points to the significance of the archaeological evidence, which suggests that specific artifacts may have been used as identity markers. This evidence also indicates the role of local leaders in building group boundaries and in leading successful raids across the Danube. The names of many powerful leaders appear in written sources, some being styled “kings.”Because of these military and political developments, Byzantine authors began employing names such as Sclavenes and Antes in order to make sense of the process of group identification that was taking place north of the Danube frontier. Slavic ethnicity is therefore shown to be a Byzantine invention. is Assistant Professor of Medieval History, University of Florida THE MAKING OF THE SLAVS History and Archaeology of the Lower Danube Region, c. – FLORIN CURTA CONTENTS List of figures page ix List of tables xiii Acknowledgments xiv List of abbreviations xv Introduction Slavic ethnicity and the ethnie of the Slavs: concepts and approaches Sources for the history of the early Slavs (c. –) The Slavs in early medieval sources (c. –) The Balkans and the Danube limes during the sixth and seventh centuries
  • Evidence for the Hun Invasion of Thrace in A.D. 422 Croke, Brian Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1977; 18, 4; Periodicals Archive Online Pg

    Evidence for the Hun Invasion of Thrace in A.D. 422 Croke, Brian Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1977; 18, 4; Periodicals Archive Online Pg

    Evidence for the Hun Invasion of Thrace in A.D. 422 Croke, Brian Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1977; 18, 4; Periodicals Archive Online pg. 347 Evidence for the Hun Invasion of Thrace in A.D. 422 Brian Croke HE HISTORY of the Hun invasions of the Danubian and Balkan Tprovinces of the Roman empire is still not as clear as one would like. We are better informed about the major and most destructive raids of 441, 442 and 447, but even here universal agree­ ment has never been achieved. Still, it was the severe impact of these large-scale and effective incursions in the 440's that overshadowed and blotted out the memory of previous, less destructive ones. It is known, for example, that the Huns broke into Thrace and caused havoc in 422, but little has ever been said about it. The latest discussion of the invasion concludes thus: "Nowhere in the history of the Huns is the one-sidedness of our sources more manifest. Hun bands skirmished with Roman soldiers almost at the gates of Constantinople. Yet no word about it appears in the detailed ecclesiastical histories, no allusion in the vast theological literature of the time."l This statement is not entirely correct. There is far more evidence for the Hun in­ vasion of Thrace than has been realised, and it is time these pieces of evidence were fitted together to elucidate the course and con­ sequence of the invasion. I. Theodoret and Priscus The only dated record of this Hun incursion into Thrace is found in the chronicle of an Illyrian, Marcellinus comes, written in Constanti­ nople shortly after the death of Anastasius (518).
  • The Vandals and Sarmatians in a New Perspective

    The Vandals and Sarmatians in a New Perspective

    CM 2017 ombrukket 7.qxp_CM 09.02.2018 12:41 Side 233 The Vandals and Sarmatians in a New Perspective ROMAN ZAROFF This study discusses the relations between the peoples known as Sarmatians, Alans, Vandals, and other groups in the context of fluid identities and political affinities of Late Antiquity and early medieval Europe. It is argued that the Van- dals underwent a substantial transformation from being dominantely farmers to centre on horse breeding and mounted warfare. In this process, Sarmatian and Alanian influence on the Vandals was crucial. One could speak of a ‘Sarma- tisation’ of Vandal warfare, economy, dressing, and conduct, but also of a Vandal confederation of identities to which other ‘barbarian’ peoples could be con- nected. Introduction The term Vandals denotes an ethnically mixed tribal confederation centred on the Germanic tribe of Vandals who during the 3rd and 4th century C.E. ravaged the Roman frontier and provinces, and who in the early 5th century settled in the north African provinces of the Roman Empire (Schmidt 1964: 308). The history of the Vandals is a widely researched subject with a large body of books, monographs and papers. Therefore, there is no need to elaborate on the history of the Vandals here. however, most of the works written by scholars and researchers in the English, German and french-speaking world focus on Vandals in the context of the Germanic Migration in Late Antiquity and its impact on the Roman Empire. It is often omitted or down- played that sometime from 418 C.E. onward, the rulers of the Vandals were called Rex Vandalorum and Alanorum – King of Vandals and Alans.