DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-UT-0000-2019-0002-Other NEPA-SLFO

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-UT-0000-2019-0002-Other NEPA-SLFO BLM United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-UT-0000-2019-0002-Other_NEPA-SLFO June 2019 Competitive Oil and Gas Lease Sale Salt Lake Field Office Area Parcels Location: Townships 7-9 North, Ranges 11-13 West, multiple sections, Salt Lake Meridian, Box Elder County, Utah. Applicant/Address: Not Applicable. Utah State Office and Salt Lake Field Office April 2019 Utah State Office 440 West 200 South, Ste. 500 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Phone: (801) 539-4001 Fax: (801) 539-4237 Prepared By: Salt Lake Field Office 2370 South Decker Lake Boulevard West Valley City, Utah 84119 Phone: (801) 977-4300 Fax: (801) 977-4397 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Purpose & Need ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 Decision to be Made ................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Conformance with BLM Land Use Plan(s)...................................................................... 4 1.5 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or Other Plans ...................................................... 4 1.6 Identification of Issues ..................................................................................................... 5 1.6.1 Air Quality ................................................................................................................ 5 1.6.2 Climate Change/Greenhouse Gases .......................................................................... 5 1.6.3 Central Pacific Railroad Grade ................................................................................. 5 1.6.4 Geology/Mineral Resources/Energy Production ...................................................... 6 1.6.5 Wildlife ..................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2 Description of Alternatives ....................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Analysis Assumptions ...................................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Reasonably Foreseeable Development Scenario ...................................................... 7 2.2.2 Well Pad and Road Construction .............................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Well Drilling and Completion Operations ................................................................ 9 2.2.4 Production Operations ............................................................................................ 10 2.2.5 Produced Water Handling ....................................................................................... 11 2.2.6 Maintenance Operations ......................................................................................... 11 2.2.7 Plugging and Abandonment .................................................................................... 11 2.3 Alternative A – Proposed Action ................................................................................... 12 2.4 Alternative B – No Action ............................................................................................. 12 2.5 Other Alternatives Considered ....................................................................................... 12 Chapter 3 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 14 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 14 3.2 General Setting ............................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Resources/Issues Brought Forward for Analysis ........................................................... 15 3.3.1 Air Quality .............................................................................................................. 15 i 3.3.2 Climate Change/Greenhouse Gases ........................................................................ 15 3.3.3 Central Pacific Railroad Grade ............................................................................... 16 3.3.4 Geology/Mineral Resources/Energy Production .................................................... 19 3.3.5 Wildlife ................................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 4 Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................... 25 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 25 4.2 Direct Impacts ................................................................................................................ 25 4.3 Indirect Impacts from Potential Development ............................................................... 25 4.3.1 Alternative A – Proposed Action ............................................................................ 25 4.3.1.1 Air Quality ....................................................................................................... 25 4.3.1.2 Climate Change/Greenhouse Gases ................................................................. 28 4.3.1.3 Central Pacific Railroad Grade ........................................................................ 30 4.3.1.4 Geology/Mineral Resources/Energy Production ............................................. 33 4.3.1.5 Wildlife ............................................................................................................ 33 4.3.2 Alternative B – No Action ...................................................................................... 35 4.3.2.1 Air Quality ....................................................................................................... 36 4.3.2.2 Climate Change/Greenhouse Gases ................................................................. 36 4.3.2.3 Central Pacific Railroad Grade ........................................................................ 36 4.3.2.4 Geology/Mineral Resources/Energy Production ............................................. 36 4.3.2.5 Wildlife ............................................................................................................ 36 4.4 Cumulative Impacts........................................................................................................ 36 4.4.1 Air Quality .............................................................................................................. 37 4.4.2 Climate Change/Greenhouse Gases ........................................................................ 38 4.4.3 Central Pacific Railroad Grade ............................................................................... 41 4.4.4 Geology/Mineral Resources/Energy Production .................................................... 42 4.4.5 Wildlife ................................................................................................................... 43 Chapter 5 Consultation and Coordination ............................................................................... 47 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 47 5.2 Persons, Groups, and Agencies Contacted/Consulted ................................................... 47 5.3 Public Participation ........................................................................................................ 48 5.3.1 Modifications Based on Public Comment and Internal Review ............................. 50 5.4 Preparers ......................................................................................................................... 51 ii Chapter 6 Appendices .............................................................................................................. 52 Appendix A – Parcel List with Stipulations and Notices ..................................................... 53 Appendix B – Stipulations and Notices ................................................................................ 56 Stipulation Summary Table .............................................................................................. 56 Notice Summary Table ..................................................................................................... 58 Appendix C – Figures/Maps ................................................................................................. 64 Appendix D – Interdisciplinary Parcel Review Team Checklist .......................................... 69 Appendix E – References...................................................................................................... 78 Appendix F – Acronyms/Abbreviations ............................................................................... 84 Appendix G – Statutes, Regulations, or Other Plans ...........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oxidized Zinc Deposits of the United States Part 2
    Oxidized Zinc Deposits of the United States Part 2. Utah By ALLEN V. HEYL GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1135-B A detailed study of the supergene zinc deposits of Utah UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printin~ Office Washin~ton 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Abstract ____________________ ~------------------------------------- B1 Introduction______________________________________________________ 1 Fieldwork____________________________________________________ 1 Acknowledgments_____________________________________________ 2 Geology__________________________________________________________ 2 Location of the deposits________________________________________ 2 ~ineralogy___________________________________________________ 3 Secondary zinc minerals_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 Smithsonite___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 H emimorphite (calamine) __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6 Hydrozincite___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ 7 Aurichalcite_____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 VVurtzite_____________________________________________ 8 Other secondary zinc minerals___________________________ 8 Associated minerals__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Microfaunas of the Oquirrh Group in the Southern East ...Tintic Mountains, Utah
    Stratigraphy and Microfaunas of the Oquirrh Group in the Southern East ...Tintic Mountains, Utah G E 0 L 0 G I C A L S U R V E Y P R 0 F E S S I 0 N A L P A P E R 1025 Stratigraphy and Microfaunas of the Oquirrh Group in the Southern East rrintic Mountains, Utah By H. T. MORRIS, R. C. DOUGLASS, and R. W. KOPF G E 0 L 0 G I CAL S lJ R V E Y P R 0 FE S S I 0 N A L PAP E R 1025 U N I T E D S T A T E S G 0 V E R N M E N T P R I N T I N G 0 F F I C E , WAS H I N G T 0 N : 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main en try under title: Morris, Hal Tryon, 1920- Stratigraphy and microfaunas of the Oquirrh Group in the southern East Tintic Mountains, Utah. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1025) Bibliography: p. 20-22. 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Pennsylvanian. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic--Permian. 3. Micropaleontology-­ Utah--Tintic Mountains. 4. Geology--Utah--Tintic Mountains. I. Douglass, Raymond Charles, joint author. II. Kopf, Rudolph William. III. Title. IV. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 1025. QE673.M67 551.7'52 77-10492 For -,ale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. GoYernment Printing Office \Vashington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Structure of the Newfoundland Mountains, Utah: Horizontal Shortening and Subsequent Extension in the Hinterland of the Sevier Belt
    Mesozoic structure of the Newfoundland Mountains, Utah: Horizontal shortening and subsequent extension in the hinterland of the Sevier belt RICHARD W. ALLMENDINGER | Department of Geological Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 TERESA E. JORDAN ABSTRACT ented at a low angle to bedding. Microfabric analysis of recrystallized The Newfoundland Mountains of northwestern Utah preserve an rocks in the contact aureole and unrecrystallized country rocks shows unusually complete record of Mesozoic deformation in the hinterland that most of the intracrystalline strain is pre-latest Jurassic in age and of the Sevier orogenic belt. Structural relations of Paleozoic miogeo- is characterized by layer-parallel shortening. Post-latest Jurassic in- clinal strata with the Newfoundland stock, which has biotite and tracrystalline strain is minor and records shortening originally ori- hornblende K/Ar ages of 153.2 ± 4.6 and 147.7 ± 4.4 m.y., respec- ented nearly vertical. The map geometries, geochronology, and tively, and dated quartz monzonite dikes (with K/Ar biotite ages of microfabric analysis suggest the following structural history (from 150.7 ± 4.5 and 143.7 ± 4.3 m.y. and a muscovite age of 149.1 ± 4.5 oldest to youngest): (1) pre-latest Jurassic regional shortening and m.y.) provide the basis for dating Mesozoic deformation in the range. thrusting and (2) syn- or post-latest Jurassic horizontal extension Geologic mapping at 1:24,000 has identified four geometric classes of during the Mesozoic. In the Cretaceous and early Tertiary,
    [Show full text]
  • W9200094.Pdf
    STATE OF UTAH DEPARTt1EtJT OF tJATURAL RESOURCES Technical Publ ication No. 42 HYDROLOG IC RECOtJNA , SSANCE OF THE tWRTHERN GREAT SALT LAKE DESERT AND SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE OF NORTHWESTERN UTAH by Jerry C. Stephens, Hydrologist U. S. Geological Survey Prepared by the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with the Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of ~ater Rights 1974 CONTENTS Page Abstract ...........................................•....................... Introduction ••••.•••.••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 2 Previous studies and acknowledgments ••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 Hydrologic reconnaissance of the northern Great Salt Lake Desert............................................................ 7 Location and general features •••••••••••.•.••••••••••••••••••.•.•.. 7 Hydrology •••••••••• ................................................ 7 Surface water •• ................................................ 7 Ground water ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 11 Shallow brine aquifer ••• ................................... 12 Alluvial-fan aquifer ••• .................................... 16 Valley-fill aquifer 20 ot he r aqui fer 5 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 22 Discussion of recharge and discharge estimates ••••••••••••• 23 ~"a te r qua litY••••••• ........................................... 23 Potential for additional water-resources development •• 26 Summary of hydrology of northwestern Utah •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 26 Surface water .................•..•................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lithic Resources Ltd
    MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES MINE ENGINEERING SERVICES Technical Report on the Crypto Zinc-Copper-Indium Project Juab County, Utah December 23, 2009 Prepared for LITHIC RESOURCES LTD. 912 - 510 West Hastings St. Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6B 1L8 Prepared by: Paul G. Tietz, C.P.G. Steven Ristorcelli, R.P.G. C. F. Staargaard, P.Geo. 775-856-5700 210 South Rock Blvd. Reno, Nevada 89502 FAX: 775-856-6053 MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES MINE ENGINEERING SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Geology and Mineralization ................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Exploration and Mining History .......................................................................................... 2 1.4 Drilling and Sampling .......................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Metallurgical Testing ........................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Mineral Resource Estimation ............................................................................................... 5 1.7 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 7 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • Geology Utah of the Mountains
    Geology of the Oquirrh Mountains, Utah by Edwin W. Tooker Open-File Report OF 99-571 1999 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Menlo Park, CA, CONTENTS Page Abstract 7 Introduction 11 Purpose of the report 11 Location, geomorphic features, and access 13 Acknowledgments 15 Geologic setting of north-central Utah 17 Precambrian basement terrane and the Uinta trend 17 Paleozoic depositional basins 20 Jurassic orogeny 22 Cretaceous Sevier orogeny 23 Formation of the Cenozoic Basin and Range province 24 Tertiary igneous activity and ore deposits 25 Uplift in the Oquirrh Mountains along the Uinta trend during the period of igneous activity 26 Quaternary uplift and Pleistocene glaciation 27 Recognition of nappes in the Oquirrh Mountains . 27 Location of the Oquirrh Mountains nappes . 28 Hinterland source of the nappes 29 Movement of the nappes 29 Convergence of nappes in the area of the future Oquirrh Mountains 30 Stratigraphic features of the main nappes 31 Pass Canyon nappe 32 Bingham nappe 33 Rogers Canyon nappe 34 Significance of variations in nappe sedimentary rocks 35 Structural features of nappes 35 Main and secondary folds 36 Faults 37 Sole and imbricate thrusts 37 Tanscurrent or tear faults 38 Tensional and other normal faults of thrust origin 39 Basin and Range normal faults 39 Igneous rocks associated with the nappes 40 Geology, correlation, and economic importance of typical nappe rocks in the Oquirrh Mountains 41 Pass Canyon nappe 42 Stratigraphic characteristics and correlation of sedimentary rocks 44 Dry Fork unit of looker and Roberts (1988) 45 Flood Canyon unit of looker and Roberts (1988) 46 __ _ _ _ _ _ _________ - _ - __ - ___ __ _ _ ____ _____________ ___ _ ______ ___ A*7__j.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1972 Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah George Gregory Francis Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Francis, George Gregory, "Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah" (1972). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1684. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1684 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRATIGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE SWAN PEAK FORMATION AND EUREKA QUARTZITE, NORTHERN UTAH by George Gregory Francis A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment· of the' requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology ADDr~d: (5o~ittee Membe;') Deal/of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1972 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his appreciation to Dr. Robert Q. Oaks for his technical assistance and inspiration throughout the study. Special thanks are due to Dr. J. Stewart Williams for identification of many Ordovician fossils, and to Dr. Donald R. Olsen and Dr. Williams for care­ ful reading of the manuscript and suggestions for its improvement. AppreCiation is extended to Walter Holmes, Calvin James, Robert Oaks, and Warren Schulingkamp for their assistance and companionship in the field. To Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Evaluation Report
    MINERAL RESOURCE EVALUATION OF LANDS SELECTED FOR THE UTAH TEST AND TRAINING RANGE EXCHANGE Prepared for the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (Photo: Newfoundland Mountains viewed from the Hogup Mountains) by Andrew Rupke and Ken Krahulec June 2017 Utah Geological Survey a division of Utah Department of Natural Resources Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................... 2 GEOLOGIC SETTING ........................................................................................................ 2 INDUSTRIAL MINERALS ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EASTERN GREAT BASIN and SNAKE RIVER DOVNVARP, GEOLOGY and PETROLEUM RESOURCES by James A
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Eastern Great Basin and Snake River Dovnvarp, Geology and Petroleum Resources By James A. Peterson Open-File Report 88-450-H This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature, Missoula, Montana 59812 1988 CONTENTS Page Introduction........................................................... 1 Tectonic summary....................................................... 1 Stratigraphic summary.................................................. 7 Proterozoic....................................................... 7 Cambrian.......................................................... 14 Ordovician........................................................ 14 Silurian.......................................................... 14 Devonian.......................................................... 14 Mississippian..................................................... 20 Pennsylvanian..................................................... 20 Permian........................................................... 20 Mesozoic.......................................................... 23 Triassic..................................................... 23 Jurassic..................................................... 23 Cretaceous................................................... 23 Tertiary.......................................................... 27 Petroleum geology...................................................... 27 Unconformi
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    BLM United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-UT-W010-2019-0001-EA March 2019 Competitive Oil and Gas Lease Sale Salt Lake Field Office Area Parcels Location: Townships 7-10 North, Ranges 11-13 West, multiple sections, Salt Lake Meridian, Box Elder County, Utah. Applicant/Address: Not Applicable. Utah State Office and Salt Lake Field Office Field Lake Salt and Office Utah State November 2018 Utah State Office 440 West 200 South, Ste. 500 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Phone: (801) 539-4001 Fax: (801) 539-4237 Prepared By: Salt Lake Field Office 2370 South Decker Lake Boulevard West Valley City, Utah 84119 Phone: (801) 977-4300 Fax: (801) 977-4397 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Purpose & Need ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 Decision to be Made ................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Conformance with BLM Land Use Plan(s)...................................................................... 3 1.5 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or Other Plans .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MP-173DM Newfoundlandmtns Plate2 REV 022221
    UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of Utah Department of Natural Resources in cooperation with Plate 2 U.S. Department of the Interior Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication 173DM U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Map of the Newfoundland Mountains and east p art of the Wells 30' x 60' Quadrangles CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS LIST OF MAP UNITS GEOLOGIC SYMBOLS INDEX TO GEOLOGIC MAPPING Surficial Quaternary-Tertiary Surficial Deposits Tertiary (Paleogene) Igneous and Sedimentary Rocks Devonian Rocks Contact –Long dashed where approximately Axial trace of anticline – Dotted where 114° 113°30' 113° MAP NAME AND AUTHORS Deposits, 41°30' 41°30' undivided located, short dashed where inferred, dotted JJJconcealed Depositional Environment Qu Ttc Dp (cross Surficial deposits, undivided (Holocene and Pleistocene) Rhyolitic tuff and sedimentary rocks (Eocene) Pilot Shale where concealed 1. Lucin NW - Miller and Oviatt, 1994 section Axial trace of syncline – Dotted where 2 2. Bovine Mountain - Jordan, 1983 only) Alluvial Playa and Spring Lacustrine and Mixed-Environment Eolian Mass-Movement Alluvial Deposits Trd Rhyodacite (Eocene) Dg Guilmette Formation Bedding plane fault – Long dashed where """ concealed 3. Terrace Mountain West - Miller and McCarthy, 2002 approximately located, dotted where 18 1 19 3 4 Qam Qal Qafy Qpm Qsm Qei Qes Qeo Qem Qmc Qam Alluvial mud (Holocene) Tg Granodiorite dikes (Eocene) Ds Simonson Dolomite concealed; ticks on hanging wall 4. Terrace Mountain East - McCarthy and Miller, 2002 Qms Holo. Qu Line of cross section Qafo Qlm Qli Qls Qlg Qla 20 5. Tecoma - Miller and Schneyer, 1985 Qal Stream alluvium (Holocene) Tbc Bettridge Creek Granodiorite (Eocene) Devonian and Silurian Rocks Overturned low-angle normal fault – Dotted 6.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synthesis of Archaeological Studies on the Utah Test and Training Range
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) Depository) 1999 A Synthesis of Archaeological Studies on the Utah Test and Training Range U.S. Air Force Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons Recommended Citation U.S. Air Force, "A Synthesis of Archaeological Studies on the Utah Test and Training Range" (1999). All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository). Paper 489. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs/489 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1111111111111111111111111111111 PB99-178055 A SYNTHESIS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES []N THE UTAH TEST AND TRAINING RANGE u.s. Air Force Air Force Materiel Command Hill Air Force Base, Utah REPRODUCED BY: tIJ]S. u.s. Department of Commerce National Technicallnfonnation Service Springfield, Virginia 22161 Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
    [Show full text]