Rabobank Nederland's Objections to Disclosure Statement; and Memorandum of Points and 13 Authorities in Support Thereof

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rabobank Nederland's Objections to Disclosure Statement; and Memorandum of Points and 13 Authorities in Support Thereof 1 RICHARD W. ESTERKIN (70769) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 2 300 South Grand Avenue Twenty-Second Floor 3 Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132 Tel.: 213.612.2500 4 Fax: 213.612.2554 5 Attorneys for RABOBANK NEDERLAND 6 7 COURT 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 01-30923 11 In re Case No. Chapter 11 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO., 12 RABOBANK NEDERLAND'S OBJECTIONS STATEMENT; AND 13 Debtor. TO DISCLOSURE MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND IN SUPPORT THEREOF 14 AUTHORITIES Date: December 19, 2001 15 Time: 9:30 a.m. Place: 235 Pine Street 16 22nd Floor Francisco, CA 17 San Judge: Hon. Dennis Montali 18 19 20 II 21 /III 22 II 23 II 24 /III 25 II 26 /11/ 27 II 28 I 1-L1./59235-6.2 7 /K 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 1 3 I. RABOBANK'S CLAIM ........................................... CLAIM .......... 1 4 II. THE PROPOSED PLAN'S TREATMENT OF RABOBANK'S 3 III. OBJECTIONS TO DISCLOSURE STATEMENT .......................... 5 A. Introduction .......................................... 3 6 B. The Disclosure Statement Fails to Provide Sufficient Information so as to Enable Creditors the Plan ..... 4 7 to Evaluate the Credit Risks Inherent in 4 8 1. Introduction ..................................... 2. The Disclosure Statement Fails to Provide Assets 9 Sufficient Information Regarding the to be Retained by the Reorganized Debtor ......... 5 10 3. The Disclosure Statement Fails to Provide Sufficient Information Regarding the Debtor's II Liabilities to be Assumed by the LLCs ............ 7 12 4. The Disclosure Statement Fails to Provide Sufficient Information Regarding the Debtor's 8 13 Post-Confirmation Operations ..................... C. The Disclosure Statement's Description of the 14 Plan's Treatment of the Class 4f Claims is 10 ............................. 15 Inadequate and Ambiguous D. The Disclosure Statement Fails to Adequately of the 16 Describe the Terms of the Proposed "Sale" Debtor's Assets to its Parent ......................... 13 17 E. The Disclosure Statement's Description of the Third Party Releases to be Provided Under the Plan 18 is Incomplete and Ambiguous ........................... 16 18 19 IV. CONCLUSION ................................................ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i AUTHORITIES 1 TABLE OF Page(s) 2 Inc., 3 In re Adana Mortgage Bankers, 5 14 B.R. 29 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1981) .......................... 4 Inc., In re Allied Gaming Management, W.D. La. 1997) .................. 13 5 209 B.R. 201, 203 (Bankr. 6 In re American Hardwoods, 4 885 F.2d 621 (9th Cir. 1989) ............................... 7 In re Andy Frain Services, Inc., ............................. 13 8 798 F.2d 1113 (7th Cir. 1986) 9 In re Apex Oil Co., 13 92 B.R. 847 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1988) ......................... 10 Street Partnership Bank of America v. 203 North LaSalle 11 (In re 203 North LaSalle Partnership), 526 U.S. 434, 5 12 119 S.Ct. 1411 (1999) ...................................... 13 In re Dakota Rail, Inc., 5 104 B.R. 138 (Bankr. Minn. 1989) ........................... 14 Donovan & Schuenke v. Sampsell, .............................. 13 15 226 F.2d 804 (9th Cir. 1955) 16 In re Joseph A. Ferretti, 6 128 B.R. 16 (Bankr. N.H. 1991) ............................. 17 In re Ligon, 1985) ........................ 4 18 50 B.R. 127 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Services, Inc., 19 In re Metrocraft Publishing 14 1984) ......................... 39 B.R. 567 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 20 In re W.A. Mallory Co., Inc., Va. 1997) ........................ 13 21 214 B.R. 834 (Bankr. E.D. 22 STATUTES 23 ........... 11 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (1).................................. 24 3 11 U.S.C. § 1125(b) ............ .................................. 25 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b) (2) (B) (ii) ................................... 26 27 28 ii B.A., 1 Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank objects to the 2 "Rabobank Nederland" ("Rabobank") hereby Under Chapter 3 "Disclosure Statement for Plan of Reorganization and Electric Company 4 11 of the Bankruptcy Code for Pacific Gas and PG&E 5 proposed by Pacific Gas and Electric Company as follows: 6 Corporation" (the "Disclosure Statement") 7 I. 8 RABOBANK'S CLAIM of Pacific Gas and 9 Rabobank is an unsecured creditor of 10 Electric Company, holding a claim in the amount as described 11 $160,834,630.14, plus interest, fees and expenses 12 in Rabobank's proof of claim filed herein. of its issuance of 13 Rabobank's claim arises as a result with the 1996 Series B 14 a standby letter of credit in connection Pollution 15 Pollution Control Bonds issued by the California Pacific Gas and 16 Control Financing.Authority at the behest of of credit was paid 17 Electric Company (the "Debtor"). That letter on May 3, 2001. The 18 by Rabobank to the beneficiaries thereof Rabobank for 19 Debtor has defaulted on its obligation to reimburse plus interest 20 the amount advanced under its letter of credit, 21 fees and expenses due thereunder. 22 CLAIM 23 THE PROPOSED PLAN'S TREATMENT OF RABOBANK'S of Reorganization 24 Pursuant to the terms of the Plan Pacific Gas and 25 Under Chapter 11 of -he Bankruptcy Code for "Plan"), 26 Electric Company dated September 20, 2001 (the claim (Prior Bond 27 Rabobank's claim is classified as a Class 4f 28 I//I I-LA/592356.2 1 1.1 (definition of "Prior Bond 1 Claims). See Plan at Article 2 Claims,") and Article III. holders terms of the Plan, unless the 3 Pursuant to the the a new letter of credit to support 4 of Prior Bond claims issue Bonds!, holders of Class 4f claims 5 Debtor's issuance of Refunding distributions on account of their 6 are to receive the following 7 claim: to the all interest and other sums due 8 a. Payment of with the terms of the 9 holder of such claims in accordance 10 applicable Reimbursement Agreement; of the principal amount due under 11 b. Payment of 60% and 12 the Reimbursement Agreement; 40% of the principal amount 13 c. As to the remaining Agreement, the Reimbursement 14 due under the Reimbursement such that "the Reorganized Debtor 15 Agreement is to be modified thereunder for the remaining forty 16 shall remain solely liable Reimbursement Obligation which 17 percent (40%) of the respective same years and bear interest at the 18 shall be payable in ten (10) notes with a ten (10) year 19 rate as the Reorganized Debtor's § 4.12(b). 20 maturity . .- Plan at foregoing plan treatment, the 21 As a result of the the 4f are exposed to the risk that 22 holders of claims in Class principal repay the deferred 40% of the 23 Debtor will be unable to the end of the ten year restructure 24 amounts of their claims at this Plan. In the case of Rabobank, 25 period contemplated by the $64,000,000. 26 obligation amounts to approximately herein have the meanings ascribed 27 1 Capitalized terms not defined and Plan. them in the Disclosure Statement 28 to 1-LA/592356".22 2 OBJECTIONS TO DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 3 A. Introduction approve 4 The Bankruptcy Code requires that this Court 5 the Disclosure Statement as containing "adequate information" the Plan. 6 prior to it being utilized to solicit acceptances of Court's 7 11 U.S.C. § 1125(b). The standard applicable to this 8 determination as to whether or not the Disclosure Statement 9 contains "adequate information" is clearly articulated by the 10 Bankruptcy Code: 11 "[A]dequate information means information of a kind, and in sufficient detail as far as is 12 reasonably practical in light of the nature and history of the debtor and the condition 13 of the debtor's books and records, that would enable a hypothetical reasonable investor 14 typical of holders of claims or interests of the relevant class to make an informed 15 judgment about the plan 16 11 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (1). as it 17 The Disclosure Statement is materially defective 18 pertains to the holders of Class 4f claims in at least four 19 respects. First, the Disclosure Statement does not contain 20 sufficient information to enable any holder of a Class 4f claim 21 to evaluate the credit risk that the Plan proposes to impose 22 upon holders of Class 4f claims. Second, the Disclosure 23 Statement's description of the proposed treatment of Class 4f 1 24 claims is ambiguous and incomplete.2 Third, the Disclosure 25 Statement fails to provide adequate information pertaining to 26 the Plan's proposed "sale" of what appears to be a substantial 27 2/ The Plan's description of the treatment accorded to Class 4f claims is similarly ambiguous and incomplete. 28 I-LA/592356 .2 -3 controlled by its 1 portion of the Debtor's assets to entities discussion of the 2 parent. Fourth, the Disclosure Statement's is ambiguous and the 3 release to be provided to PG&E Corporation the claims being released 4 Disclosure Statement fails to describe creditors can determine 5 with sufficient particularity so that claims in exchange for 6 whether or not they wish to release those 7 the treatment proposed under the Plan.•/ Sufficient The Disclosure Statement Fails to Provide 8 B. Evaluate the Information so as to Enable Creditors to 9 Credit Risks Inherent in the Plan. 10 i. Introduction. a claim in Class 4f 11 In order to permit the holder of Plan proposes to impose 12 to evaluate the credit risk that the require information 13 upon that creditor, the creditor would Debtor (as only the 14 concerning (a) the assets of the Reorganized for the deferred portion 15 Reorganized Debtor is to remain liable by Class 4f creditors), (b) 16 of the distribution to be received Debtor will be assuming 17 the liabilities that the Reorganized regarding the Reorganized 18 under the Plan and (c) information operations.
Recommended publications
  • Market Overview a Quarterly Publication of the San Francisco Office Market by the Axiant Group 2Nd Quarter 2020
    Market Overview A quarterly publication of the San Francisco office market by The Axiant Group 2nd Quarter 2020 PG&E Moves Across The Bay Covid-19 has in essence shut down the PG&E, embroiled in bankruptcy proceedings, has just office leasing market in San Francisco. committed to moving its headquarters from San Francisco Because of shelter in place orders and a real fear of contracting to Oakland as a cost-cutting move. They have leased 600,000 the virus, building tours are non-existent. In addition, the square feet at 300 Lakeside Drive. PG&E plans to occupy the economy has been stilted due to the pandemic. Most tenants space in 2022. As want to see stabilization of the virus or a vaccine before leases expire, considering long term commitments. We are seeing increased they will fill inventory of sublease space flooding the market, particularly the rest of the from the tech industry. building and also have a right to Sublease Space Increases Dramatically purchase the Second quarter vacancy rates increased dramatically from an building. 300 adjusted 6.7% in the 1st quarter to 8.4% in the 2nd quarter. Lakeshore Drive, Gross leasing activity decreased from 1,037,496 square feet built in 1960 in the 1st quarter to 791,518 square feet in the 2nd quarter. for Kaiser as Net absorption was significantly lower again at negative 300 LAKESIDE DRIVE, OAKLAND their company absorpstion of 1,043,366 square feet, compared to 1st quarter headquarters, went through a significant renovation in 2004. with negative absorption of 297,300 square feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Overview a Quarterly Publication of the San Francisco Office Market by the Axiant Group 1St Quarter 2020
    Market Overview A quarterly publication of the San Francisco office market by The Axiant Group 1st Quarter 2020 multiple buildings in Oakland, three of which they owned. COVID-19 will undoubtedly change Kaiser sited construction costs and delays as the major the future of real estate. The 1st quarter factors in the decision, not COVID-19. Many felt the project lost significant momentum when its Kaiser’s Chairman and numbers do not reflect the shelter-in- CEO, Bernard Tyson, the chief activist and mentor for the place order as it went into effect just prior project, died in November at age 60. to the end of the quarter. Overall rents The sale of the Uptown Station remain stable, vacancy rates increased. (former Capwell’s/ Sears) project fell Vacancy Rate Increases, Rent Stable apart when the First quarter vacancy rates increased from an adjusted buyer, Blackstone 5.5% in the 4th quarter to 6.5% in the 1st quarter. Gross Group, walked away leasing activity decreased from 1,886,983 square feet in the from a $20 million 4th quarter to 1,037,496 square feet in the 1st quarter. Net deposit upon fears UPTOWN STATION, OAKLAND absorption was significantly lower and negative at -603,723 that the real estate square feet, compared to 4th quarter. With positive absorption of and finance markets would become shaky in the wake of 743,407 square feet. This represents a swing of over 1,300,000 the COVID-19 pandemic. The sale would have come in at square feet. over $1,000 per foot, $300 per foot higher than any other Average asking comparable real estate transactions in the Oakland market.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2020 Report Corporations Code Section 301.3 Report Methodology
    ALEX PADILLA SECRETARY OF STATE OFFICE March 2020 Report Corporations Code Section 301.3 Report Methodology The July 2019 Report and March 2020 Report have been created by using publicly available information provided in annual California and annual federal filings by corporations, as well as information provided by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), NYSE American (formerly known as the American Stock Exchange or AMEX and more recently as NYSE MKT), National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ), and other sources available on the internet, including company websites. The Secretary of State posted a benchmark report on July 1, 2019, listing all publicly held corporations that stated a principal executive office in California on the annual report filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Form 10-K) during the 6-month period of January 1, 2019 through June 30, 2019. The July 2019 Report also listed all publicly traded corporations identified through the Publicly Traded Disclosure Search on the Secretary of State’s website that reported having at least one female director on their annual Corporate Disclosure Statement filings with the Secretary of State. The March 2020 Report has been created by combining information in the July 2019 Report with data for the additional 6-month period of July 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. The information and statistics provided in the reports were generated by a search of the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (EDGAR) for corporations listing a principal executive office in California on their SEC Form 10-K filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitch Ratings ING Groep N.V. Ratings Report 2020-10-15
    Banks Universal Commercial Banks Netherlands ING Groep N.V. Ratings Foreign Currency Long-Term IDR A+ Short-Term IDR F1 Derivative Counterparty Rating A+(dcr) Viability Rating a+ Key Rating Drivers Support Rating 5 Support Rating Floor NF Robust Company Profile, Solid Capitalisation: ING Groep N.V.’s ratings are supported by its leading franchise in retail and commercial banking in the Benelux region and adequate Sovereign Risk diversification in selected countries. The bank's resilient and diversified business model Long-Term Local- and Foreign- AAA emphasises lending operations with moderate exposure to volatile businesses, and it has a Currency IDRs sound record of earnings generation. The ratings also reflect the group's sound capital ratios Country Ceiling AAA and balanced funding profile. Outlooks Pandemic Stress: ING has enough rating headroom to absorb the deterioration in financial Long-Term Foreign-Currency Negative performance due to the economic fallout from the coronavirus crisis. The Negative Outlook IDR reflects the downside risks to Fitch’s baseline scenario, as pressure on the ratings would Sovereign Long-Term Local- and Negative increase substantially if the downturn is deeper or more prolonged than we currently expect. Foreign-Currency IDRs Asset Quality: The Stage 3 loan ratio remained sound at 2% at end-June 2020 despite the economic disruption generated by the lockdowns in the countries where ING operates. Fitch Applicable Criteria expects higher inflows of impaired loans from 4Q20 as the various support measures mature, driven by SMEs and mid-corporate borrowers and more vulnerable sectors such as oil and gas, Bank Rating Criteria (February 2020) shipping and transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-00985C3340.Pdf
    SERVICE LIST JCCP 4765 ADDRESS PARTY Trenton H. Norris ABACO Partners LLC; Commonwealth Sarah Esmaili Soap & Toiletries, Inc.; E.T. Browne Arnold & Porter LLP Drug Company, Inc.; Home & Body Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor Company, Inc.; Method Products, Inc. San Francisco, CA 94111 [email protected] [email protected] Kevin C. Mayer Added Extras LLC Crowell & Moring LLP 515 S. Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 [email protected] John E. Dittoe Advanced Healthcare Distributors, Reed Smith LLP L.L.C.; CVS Pharmacy, Inc. 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] Paul H. Burleigh Alberto-Culver Company; TIGI Linea LeclairRyan, LLP Corp. 725 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 350 Los Angeles, CA 90017 [email protected] Bruce Nye Albertson’s, LLC; Raani Corporation; Barbara Adams SUPERVALU, Inc. Adams Nye Becht LLP 222 Kearny Street, Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 [email protected] [email protected] Jason L. Weisberg Archipelago, Inc. Roxborough Pomerance Nye & Adreani 5820 Canoga Avenue, Suite 250 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 [email protected] Sophia B. Belloli Aspire Brands; Bonne Bell, LLC Michael Van Zandt Hanson Bridgett LLP 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] Richard E. Haskin Awesome Products, Inc. Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet Wittbrodt LLP 1880 Century Park East, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 [email protected] Robert A. Randick Barbera Studio, Inc. Randick O’Dea & Tooliatos, LLP 5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 225
    [Show full text]
  • SAN FRANCISCO) Z
    1 Irving Sulmeyer (CA Bar No. 22910) Victor A. Sahn (CA Bar No. 97299) 2 Frank V. Zerunyan (CA Bar No. 140191) SULMEYER, KUPETZ, BAUMANN & ROTHMAN 3 A Professional Corporation 300 South Grand Avenue, 14th Floor 4 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 626-2311 5 Facsimile: (213) 629-4520 6 Attorneys for Certain California Counties with Claims against Pacific Gas & Electric Co. 7 8 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO) z 04 11 00 U') 12 In re CASE NO. 01-30923 DM 11 z 13 Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Chapter (LLI Z oN >-I u ,,-NCD< 14 Debtor. M W CD 15 Federal I.D. No. 94-0742640 16 0UCOC' >- C -LJ l J 17 C', 18 19 20 21 22 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL RE 23 (1) RULE 2019 STATEMENT AND (2) REQUEST FOR SPECIAL NOTICE 24 25 I am employed in the City and County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the 26 age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 300 South 27 Grand Avenue, 14 th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071. 28 [IS\AP1 D\41117R 1 5/141401 (3:07 PMVI--611~~1~, ~ Jr PROOF OF SERVICE of documents for 1 I am readily familiar with the practice for collection and processing & Rothman, a 2 mailing with the United States Postal Service of Sulmeyer, Kupetz, Baumann with the United 3 Professional Corporation, and that practice is that the documents are deposited in the 4 States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid the same day as the day of collection 5 ordinary course of business.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Quality Service Is Key Differentiator for European Banks 2018 Greenwich Leaders: European Large Corporate Banking and Cash Management
    High-Quality Service is Key Differentiator for European Banks 2018 Greenwich Leaders: European Large Corporate Banking and Cash Management Q1 2018 After weathering the chaos of the financial crisis and the subsequent restructuring of the European banking industry, Europe’s largest companies are enjoying a welcome phase of stability in their banking relationships. Credit is abundant (at least for big companies with good credit ratings), service is good and getting better, and banks are getting easier to work with. Aside from European corporates, the primary beneficiaries of this new stability are the big banks that already count many of Europe’s largest companies as clients. At the top of that list sits BNP Paribas, which is used for corporate banking by 65% of Europe’s largest companies. HSBC is next at 56%, followed by Deutsche Bank at 43%, UniCredit at 38% and Citi at 37%. These banks are the 2018 Greenwich Share Leaders℠ in European Top-Tier Large Corporate Banking. Greenwich Share Leaders — 2018 GREENWICH ASSOCIATES Greenwich Share20 1Leade8r European Top-Tier Large Corporate Banking Market Penetration Eurozone Top-Tier Large Corporate Banking Market Penetration Bank Market Penetration Statistical Rank Bank Market Penetration Statistical Rank BNP Paribas 1 BNP Paribas 1 HSBC 2 HSBC 2 Deutsche Bank 3 UniCredit 3T UniCredit 4T Deutsche Bank 3T Citi 4T Commerzbank 5T ING Bank 5T Note: Based on 576 respondents from top-tier companies. Note: Based on 360 respondents from top-tier companies. European Top-Tier Large Corporate Eurozone Top-Tier Large Corporate Cash Management Market Penetration Cash Management Market Penetration Bank Market Penetration Statistical Rank Bank Market Penetration Statistical Rank BNP Paribas ¡ 1 BNP Paribas 1 HSBC 2 HSBC 2T Deutsche Bank 3 UniCredit 2T Citi 4T Deutsche Bank 4 UniCredit 4T Commerzbank 5T ING Bank 5T Note: Based on 605 respondents from top-tier companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Handelsbanken Nederland Factsheet
    Handelsbanken Nederland Factsheet HANDELSBANKEN GROEP HANDELSBANKEN NEDERLAND - Opgericht in 1871 in Stockholm, Zweden; - Bank voor particulieren, ondernemers en - Beursgenoteerde, internationaal opererende bank bedrijven. Maatwerk, hoge servicekwaliteit in meer dan 20 landen, met ruim 800 kantoren en en een persoonlijke aanpak kenmerken onze meer dan 12.000 medewerkers; dienstverlening; - Lokale aanwezigheid, diepgaande kennis van de - Sterk in hypotheken en financieringen; een volledig lokale markt, hoge klanttevredenheid en hoge aanbod van diensten voor particulieren op het kwaliteit van uitstaande kredieten; gebied van betalen en sparen; - Conservatief risicoprofiel resulteert in lage - Vermogensbeheer via Optimix, een volledige kredietverliezen (2018: 0,04%); dochteronderneming van Handelsbanken; - De bank heeft geen verkoopdoelstellingen; - Internationale financierings- en cashmanagement- - Handelsbanken heeft nooit overheidssteun nodig oplossingen via wereldwijd kantorennetwerk; gehad, ook niet tijdens de financiële crisis; - Geen bonussen voor management en - Nederland is één van de zes thuismarkten van medewerkers; Handelsbanken, naast Zweden, het Verenigd - Aantal medewerkers in Nederland: 307 (Q4 2018). Koninkrijk, Denemarken, Finland en Noorwegen. LANDELIJK KANTORENNETWERK ONZE FILOSOFIE 29 kantoren door heel Nederland, met opening van Handelsbanken is een bank met een sterk nieuwe kantoren in de planning. gedecentraliseerde en kostenefficiënte manier van werken. Kantoren kunnen lokaal, dicht bij de klant, Alkmaar Breda Maastricht
    [Show full text]
  • Lloyds Banking Group PLC
    Lloyds Banking Group PLC Primary Credit Analyst: Nigel Greenwood, London (44) 20-7176-1066; [email protected] Secondary Contact: Richard Barnes, London (44) 20-7176-7227; [email protected] Table Of Contents Major Rating Factors Outlook Rationale Related Criteria Related Research WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 5, 2020 1 THIS WAS PREPARED EXCLUSIVELY FOR USER CIARAN TRELLIS. NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED. Lloyds Banking Group PLC Major Rating Factors Issuer Credit Rating BBB+/Negative/A-2 Strengths: Weaknesses: • Market-leading franchise in U.K. retail banking, and • Geographically concentrated in the U.K., which is strong positions in U.K. corporate banking and now in recession owing to the impact of COVID-19. insurance. • Our risk-adjusted capital (RAC) ratio is lower than • Cost-efficient operating model that supports strong the average for U.K. peers, which partly reflects the pre-provision profitability, business stability, and deduction of Lloyds' material investment in its competitiveness. insurance business. • Supportive funding and liquidity profiles anchored by strong deposit franchise. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 5, 2020 2 THIS WAS PREPARED EXCLUSIVELY FOR USER CIARAN TRELLIS. NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED. Lloyds Banking Group PLC Outlook The negative outlook on Lloyds Banking Group reflects potential earnings pressures arising from the economic and market impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Downside scenario If we saw clear signs that the U.K. systemwide domestic loan loss rate was going to exceed 100 basis points in 2020, and not be offset by the prospect of a quick economic recovery, we would likely lower the anchor, our starting point for rating U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • 181 Fremont Street
    SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Certificate of Determination 1650 Mission St. Suite 400 EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW San Francisco, CA 94103-2479 Case No.: 2007.0456E Reception: Project Title: 181 Fremont Street 415.558.6378 Zoning/Plan Area: C-3-0 (SD) Downtown Office Special Development District; Transit Center Commercial Special Use District; 415.558.6409 700-S Height and Bulk District; Transit Center District Plan Block/Lot: Planning 3719/10 & 11 Information: Lot Size: 15,312.5 square feet 415.558.6377 Project Sponsor: Daniel R. Kingsley, SKS Fremont, LLC, (415) 421-8200 Staff Contact: Michael Jacinto (415) 575-9033 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project sponsor, SKS Fremont, LLC, proposes to demolish two existing structures and develop one 700-foot-tall tower (745 feet to the top of the parapet/mechanical screen) on two lots located at the east side of Fremont Street immediately south of the new Transhay Transit Center that is currently under construction. The project site, as shown in Figure 1, comprises two parcels, is approximately 15,310 square feet in size, and is located within the approved Transit Center District Plan (TCDP or Plan) area. The proposed tower would include a mix of office, residential, and retail, along with five levels of below grade parking, off-street loading spaces, residential and office lobbies and amenities for the project residents (continued on next page). EXEMPT STATUS: Exempt per Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines California. REMARKS: (see page 18, below) DETERMINATION: I do hereby certify that the above determination has been made pursuant to State and Local requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • ING Credit Update 4Q2020
    ING Credit Update 4Q2020 ING Investor Relations 12 February 2021 Key points . 2020 was a year marked by the Covid-19 pandemic and the unprecedented challenges it presented to our customers, employees and society. We continue to take actions to provide support and with vaccination programmes being rolled out globally, we look forward to return to more normal circumstances in the near future . We continue our efforts to build a sustainable company, also reflected in our strong ESG profile . The current environment underscores the strength of our digital business model. We continued to grow primary customers, as they choose us as their go-to bank, while mobile interactions further increased . Pre-provision result was resilient, though the impact from Covid-19 is visible, most notably on lending and savings. After years of growth, 2020 net core lending was down by €2.5 bln, while net deposit inflow was high at €41.4 bln . Fee growth was good, as our actions on investment products and daily banking more than compensated for the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on fees for payments and lending . 2020 risk costs were €2.7 bln with ~30% in Stage 1 and 2, mainly due to Covid-19, reflecting IFRS 9 related provisions and management overlays. For 2021 we expect to move close to our through-the–cycle average of ~25 bps . The Stage 3 ratio remained low at 1.7% and we are confident on the quality of our loan book, supported by a proven risk management framework with a strong track record, also compared to peers .
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Labeled Buildings List Final Feb6 Bystate
    ENERGY STAR® Qualified Buildings and Manufacturing Plants As of December 31, 2007 Building/Plant Name City State Building/Plant Type Alabama Calhoun County Administration Building Anniston AL Courthouse Calhoun County Court House Anniston AL Courthouse 10044 Birmingham AL Office Alabama Operations Center Birmingham AL Office BellSouth City Center Birmingham AL Office Birmingham Homewood TownePlace Suites by Marriott Birmingham AL Hotel/Motel Roberta Plant Calera AL Cement Plant Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC Lincoln AL Auto Assembly Plant Alaska Elmendorf AFB, 3MDG, DoD/VA Joint Venture Hospital Elmendorf Air Force Base AK Hospital Arizona 311QW - Phoenix Chandler Courtyard Chandler AZ Hotel/Motel Bashas' Chandler AZ Supermarket/Grocery Bashas' Food City Chandler AZ Supermarket/Grocery Phoenix Cement Clarkdale AZ Cement Plant Flagstaff Embassy Suites Flagstaff AZ Hotel/Motel Fort Defiance Indian Hospital Fort Defiance AZ Hospital 311K5 - Phoenix Mesa Courtyard Mesa AZ Hotel/Motel 100 North 15th Avenue Building Phoenix AZ Office 1110 West Washington Building Phoenix AZ Office 24th at Camelback Phoenix AZ Office 311JF - Phoenix Camelback Courtyard Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel 311K3 - Courtyard Phoenix Airport Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel 311K4 - Phoenix North Courtyard Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel 3131 East Camelback Phoenix AZ Office 57442 - Phoenix Airport Residence Inn Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel Arboleda Phoenix AZ Office Bashas' Food City Phoenix AZ Supermarket/Grocery Biltmore Commerce Center Phoenix AZ Office Biltmore Financial Center I Phoenix AZ
    [Show full text]