DOCSLIB.ORG

Resource Management Plan for Santa Margarita Preserve San Diego County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resource Management Plan for Santa Margarita Preserve San Diego County Resource Management Plan for Santa Margarita Preserve San Diego County June 2012 Santa Margarita Preserve RMP June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS .............................................................................................. iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Resource Management Plan ................................................ 1 1.1.1 Draft North County Plan ............................................................... 2 1.1.2 Draft North County MSCP Framework RMP and ASMDs ............ 2 1.2 Implementation ........................................................................................ 3 1.2.1 Management Approach ................................................................ 3 1.2.2 Responsible Parties/Designation of Land Manager ...................... 3 1.2.3 Regulatory Context ....................................................................... 4 1.2.4 Funding Mechanism ..................................................................... 4 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... 5 2.1 Property Location .................................................................................... 5 2.2 Geographical Setting ............................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Site Access ................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Draft North County Plan Context .................................................. 8 2.2.3 County of San Diego General Plan Context ................................. 8 2.3 Physical and Climatic Conditions ............................................................ 8 2.3.1 Geology and Soils ........................................................................ 8 2.3.2 Climate ....................................................................................... 11 2.3.3 Hydrology ................................................................................... 11 2.3.4 Fire History ................................................................................. 13 2.4 Land Use ............................................................................................... 13 2.4.1 On-Site Land Use ....................................................................... 13 2.4.2 Adjacent Properties .................................................................... 13 2.4.3 Easements, Rights or Restrictive Covenants ............................. 13 2.5 Trails ..................................................................................................... 15 3.0 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ........................................................................ 17 3.1 Vegetation Communities/Habitat ........................................................... 17 3.2 Plant Species ........................................................................................ 24 3.2.1 Plant Species Present ................................................................ 24 3.2.2 Rare, Threatened or Endangered Plants Present ...................... 24 3.2.3 Rare, Threatened or Endangered Plants with High Potential to Occur .......................................................................................... 26 3.2.4 Non-Native and/or Invasive Plant Species ................................. 26 3.3 Wildlife Species ..................................................................................... 32 3.3.1 Wildlife Species Present ............................................................. 32 3.3.2 Rare, Threatened or Endangered Wildlife Present ..................... 32 3.3.3 Rare, Threatened or Endangered Wildlife with High Potential to Occur .......................................................................................... 41 3.3.4 Non-native and/or Invasive Wildlife Species ............................... 48 3.4 Overall Biological and Conservation Value ........................................... 48 i Santa Margarita Preserve RMP June 2012 3.4.1 Wildlife Linkages and Corridors .................................................. 49 4.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES ........................................................................... 51 4.1 Site History ............................................................................................ 51 4.1.1 Pre-Contact ................................................................................ 51 4.1.2 Post-Contact ............................................................................... 52 4.1.3 Historic Overview of the Santa Margarita Preserve .................... 58 4.2 Native American Consultation ............................................................... 61 4.3 Cultural Resource Descriptions ............................................................. 61 4.3.1 Prehistoric Resources ................................................................ 62 4.3.2 Historic Resources ..................................................................... 62 4.4 Resource Significance .......................................................................... 63 5.0 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ....................................................................... 65 5.1 Management Goals and Objectives ...................................................... 65 5.1.1 Draft North County Plan Goals ................................................... 65 5.1.2 Management Directives and Implementation Measures ............. 65 5.2 Biological Resources Element (A) ......................................................... 66 5.2.1 Biological Monitoring .................................................................. 66 5.2.2 Draft North County Plan Covered Species-Specific Monitoring and Management .............................................................................. 68 5.2.3 Non-Native and/or Invasive Wildlife Species Control ................. 72 5.2.4 Future Research ......................................................................... 73 5.3 Vegetation Management Element (B) ................................................... 74 5.3.1 Habitat Restoration ..................................................................... 74 5.3.2 Invasive, Non-Native Plant Species Removal and Control ......... 74 5.3.3 Fire Prevention, Control, and Management ................................ 75 5.4 Public Use, Trails, and Recreation Element (C) .................................... 76 5.4.1 Public Access ............................................................................. 76 5.4.2 Fencing and Gates ..................................................................... 77 5.4.3 Trail and Access Road Maintenance .......................................... 77 5.4.4 Signage ...................................................................................... 78 5.5 Operations and Facility Maintenance Element (D) ................................ 79 5.5.1 Litter/Trash and Materials Storage ............................................. 79 5.5.2 Hydrological Management .......................................................... 79 5.5.3 Emergency, Safety and Police Services ..................................... 80 5.5.4 Adjacency Management Issues .................................................. 80 5.6 Cultural Resources Element (E) ............................................................ 82 6.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................. 86 ii Santa Margarita Preserve RMP June 2012 TABLES Table 1. Vegetation Communities/Land Cover Types within the Preserve ............. 18 Table 2. Non-native Invasive Plants within the Preserve ........................................ 27 Table 3. Potential Significance of Cultural Resource within the Preserve ................ 64 FIGURES Figure 1. Regional Location ...................................................................................... 6 Figure 2. Preserve Vicinity Map ................................................................................ 7 Figure 3. Proposed North County Plan Designations ................................................ 9 Figure 4. Soils Map ................................................................................................. 10 Figure 5. Hydrology Map ......................................................................................... 12 Figure 6. Fire History .............................................................................................. 14 Figure 7. Trails ........................................................................................................ 16 Figure 8. Vegetation Communities – Vegetation Classification Manual .................. 21 Figure 9. Special Status Plant Species ................................................................... 25 Figure 10. Invasive Plant Locations ........................................................................ 29 Figure 11. Special Status Wildlife Species .............................................................. 33 Figure 12. Wildlife Corridor Movement Area ........................................................... 50 APPENDICES Appendix A Management Directive and Implementation Measure Summary Table Appendix B Baseline Biodiversity Report Santa Margarita Preserve Appendix C Cultural Resources Survey and Inventory for the Santa Margarita Preserve, San Diego County, California (Confidential) Appendix D Santa Margarita Preserve Vegetation Management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sistema De Clasificación Artificial De Las Magnoliatas Sinántropas De Cuba
    Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO COOPERADO DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE: MANEJOS FORESTAL Y TURÍSTICO UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE, ESPAÑA UNIVERSIDAD DE PINAR DEL RÍO, CUBA TESIS EN OPCIÓN AL GRADO CIENTÍFICO DE DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS SISTEMA DE CLASIFICACIÓN ARTIFICIAL DE LAS MAGNOLIATAS SINÁNTROPAS DE CUBA Pedro- Pabfc He.r retira Qltver CUBA 2006 Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO COOPERADO DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE: MANEJOS FORESTAL Y TURÍSTICO UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE, ESPAÑA Y UNIVERSIDAD DE PINAR DEL RÍO, CUBA TESIS EN OPCIÓN AL GRADO CIENTÍFICO DE DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS SISTEMA DE CLASIFICACIÓN ARTIFICIAL DE LAS MAGNOLIATAS SINÁNTROPAS DE CUBA ASPIRANTE: Lie. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver Investigador Auxiliar Centro Nacional de Biodiversidad Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática Ministerio de Ciencias, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente DIRECTORES: CUBA Dra. Nancy Esther Ricardo Ñapóles Investigador Titular Centro Nacional de Biodiversidad Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática Ministerio de Ciencias, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente ESPAÑA Dr. Andreu Bonet Jornet Piiofesjar Titular Departamento de EGdfegfe Universidad! dte Mearte CUBA 2006 Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver I. INTRODUCCIÓN 1 II. ANTECEDENTES 6 2.1 Historia de los esquemas de clasificación de las especies sinántropas (1903-2005) 6 2.2 Historia del conocimiento de las plantas sinantrópicas en Cuba 14 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019, Volume 65, Number 2
    The Journal of The Journal of SanSan DiegoDiego HistoryHistory The Journal of San Diego History The San Diego History Center, founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928, has always been the catalyst for the preservation and promotion of the history of the San Diego region. The San Diego History Center makes history interesting and fun and seeks to engage audiences of all ages in connecting the past to the present and to set the stage for where our community is headed in the future. The organization operates museums in two National Historic Districts, the San Diego History Center and Research Archives in Balboa Park, and the Junípero Serra Museum in Presidio Park. The History Center is a lifelong learning center for all members of the community, providing outstanding educational programs for schoolchildren and popular programs for families and adults. The Research Archives serves residents, scholars, students, and researchers onsite and online. With its rich historical content, archived material, and online photo gallery, the San Diego History Center’s website is used by more than 1 million visitors annually. The San Diego History Center is a Smithsonian Affiliate and one of the oldest and largest historical organizations on the West Coast. Front Cover: Illustration by contemporary artist Gene Locklear of Kumeyaay observing the settlement on Presidio Hill, c. 1770. Back Cover: View of Presidio Hill looking southwest, c. 1874 (SDHC #11675-2). Design and Layout: Allen Wynar Printing: Crest Offset Printing Copy Edits: Samantha Alberts Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life.
    [Show full text]
  • California Indian Garden – Plant List and Plant Uses
    California Indian Garden Plant List Spring 2018 Common name Scientific name Indian Uses Bladderpod Isomeris arborea Seeds and flowers eaten Black sage Salvia mellifera Seeds ground into a meal for baking; tea made from leaves and stem Blue elderberry Sambucus nigra Berries used as food and sauce, plant also used for medicine, dyes for basketry, arrow shafts, flute, whistles, clapper sticks, and folk medicine Bush monkey flower Mimulus aurantiacus Young stems and leaves eaten as greens; used to treat burns, wounds, colds, cough, flu, stomach disorders and heart ailments CA buckwheat Eriogonum fasciculatum Leaf tea used for headache and stomach pain, root tea for colds and laryngitis; root poultice applied to wounds Chamise Adenostoma fasciculatum Infusion of bark and leaves used to cure syphilis; oils used to treat skin infections; scale insect on plant used as a binding agent; branches used to make arrow shafts and points Coast cholla Cylindropuntia prolifera Flowers and fruits for food Coast live oak Quercus agrifolia Acorns used as an important food staple Coast prickly pear Opuntia littoralis Fruit used for food, syrup, juice, candy and gum; young, green nopales (stems) also eaten; used to treat wounds, rheumatism, mumps, and reduce swelling; spines for needles and juice for dye Coast sunflower Encelia californica No known uses Coastal sagebrush Artemisia californica Leaves used for a variety of medicinal treatments: toothaches, wounds, asthma, colds, coughs, rheumatism, menstrual problems, to ease childbirth, menopausal symptoms,
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Margarita River Trail Preserve Acquisition
    COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation September 6, 2018 SANTA MARGARITA RIVER TRAIL PRESERVE ACQUISITION Project No. 18-015-01 Project Manager: Greg Gauthier RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse up to $9,750,000 to The Wildlands Conservancy for acquisition of approximately 1,390 acres along the Santa Margarita River for conservation and recreation purposes. LOCATION: Santa Margarita River, County of San Diego PROGRAM CATEGORY: Integrated Coastal and Marine Resource Protection EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location, Site Map, and APN Numbers Exhibit 2: Santa Margarita River Trail Preserve Photographs Exhibit 3: Project Letters RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Chapter 5.5 of Division 21 of the Public Resources Code: “The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes disbursement of an amount not to exceed nine million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($9,750,000) to The Wildlands Conservancy for acquisition of approximately 1,390 acres along the Santa Margarita River, as shown in Exhibit 1, for conservation and recreation purposes. This authorization is subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to disbursement of any funds for acquisition of the property, The Wildlands Conservancy shall submit for the review and approval of the Executive Officer of the Conservancy: a) all relevant acquisition documents, including the appraisal, agreement of purchase and sale, escrow instructions, deeds, and documents of title; b) a baseline conditions report; c) a monitoring and reporting plan; and d) evidence that sufficient funds are available to complete the acquisition. 2. The Wildlands Conservancy shall not pay more than fair market value for the property acquired pursuant to this authorization, as established in an appraisal approved by the Executive Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses
    Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses Regulatory_Issues_Trends.doc CHAPTER 2 BENEFICIAL USES INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USES ..........................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE PORTER-COLOGNE WATER QUALITY CONTROL ACT ..1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT .................................................2 BENEFICIAL USE DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................3 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL BENEFICIAL USES ..................................................................................7 BENEFICIAL USES FOR SPECIFIC WATER BODIES ........................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF RARE BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF COLD FRESHWATER HABITAT BENEFICIAL USE ...............................................9 DESIGNATION OF SPAWNING, REPRODUCTION, AND/ OR EARLY DEVELOPMENT (SPWN) BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................................11 SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER POLICY ..................................................................................11 EXCEPTIONS TO THE "SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER" POLICY................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Pacifying Paradise: Violence and Vigilantism in San Luis Obispo
    PACIFYING PARADISE: VIOLENCE AND VIGILANTISM IN SAN LUIS OBISPO A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History by Joseph Hall-Patton June 2016 ii © 2016 Joseph Hall-Patton ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Pacifying Paradise: Violence and Vigilantism in San Luis Obispo AUTHOR: Joseph Hall-Patton DATE SUBMITTED: June 2016 COMMITTEE CHAIR: James Tejani, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History COMMITTEE MEMBER: Kathleen Murphy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History COMMITTEE MEMBER: Kathleen Cairns, Ph.D. Lecturer of History iv ABSTRACT Pacifying Paradise: Violence and Vigilantism in San Luis Obispo Joseph Hall-Patton San Luis Obispo, California was a violent place in the 1850s with numerous murders and lynchings in staggering proportions. This thesis studies the rise of violence in SLO, its causation, and effects. The vigilance committee of 1858 represents the culmination of the violence that came from sweeping changes in the region, stemming from its earliest conquest by the Spanish. The mounting violence built upon itself as extensive changes took place. These changes include the conquest of California, from the Spanish mission period, Mexican and Alvarado revolutions, Mexican-American War, and the Gold Rush. The history of the county is explored until 1863 to garner an understanding of the borderlands violence therein. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………... 1 PART I - CAUSATION…………………………………………………… 12 HISTORIOGRAPHY……………………………………………........ 12 BEFORE CONQUEST………………………………………..…….. 21 WAR……………………………………………………………..……. 36 GOLD RUSH……………………………………………………..….. 42 LACK OF LAW…………………………………………………….…. 45 RACIAL DISTRUST………………………………………………..... 50 OUTSIDE INFLUENCE………………………………………………58 LOCAL CRIME………………………………………………………..67 CONCLUSION……………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Payment of Taxes As a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: a Nineteenth Century Anachronism Averill Q
    Santa Clara Law Review Volume 9 | Number 1 Article 13 1-1-1969 Payment of Taxes as a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: A Nineteenth Century Anachronism Averill Q. Mix Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Averill Q. Mix, Comment, Payment of Taxes as a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: A Nineteenth Century Anachronism, 9 Santa Clara Lawyer 244 (1969). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol9/iss1/13 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Law Review by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTS PAYMENT OF TAXES AS A CONDITION OF TITLE BY ADVERSE POSSESSION: A NINETEENTH CENTURY ANACHRONISM In California the basic statute governing the obtaining of title to land by adverse possession is section 325 of the Code of Civil Procedure.' This statute places California with the small minority of states that unconditionally require payment of taxes as a pre- requisite to obtaining such title. The logic of this requirement has been under continual attack almost from its inception.2 Some of its defenders state, however, that it serves to give the true owner notice of an attempt to claim his land adversely.' Superficially, the law in California today appears to be well settled, but litigation in which the tax payment requirement is a prominent issue continues to arise.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Margarita River Watershed Annual Watermaster Report for the 2013-14 Water Year
    SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED ANNUAL WATERMASTER REPORT WATER YEAR 2013-14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FALLBROOK PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT, ET AL. CIVIL NO. 51-CV-1247-GPC-RBB CHARLES W. BINDER WATERMASTER P. 0. BOX 631 FALLBROOK, CA 92088 (760) 728-1028 FAX (760) 728-1990 August 2015 WATERMASTER SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. SECTION 1 - SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2 - INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 5 2.1 Background ......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Authority .............................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Scope .................................................................................................................. 5 SECTION 3 - SURFACE WATER AVAILABILITY AND USE ......................................... 7 3.1 Surface Flow ........................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Surface Water Diversions .................................................................................. 13 3.3 Water Storage ................................................................................................... 13 SECTION 4- SUBSURFACE WATER AVAILABILITY ................................................. 19 4.1 General .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recovering California Steelhead South of Santa Cruz
    THE OSPREY • ISSUE NO. 75 MAY 2013 15 Recovering California Steelhead South of Santa Cruz By Kurt Zimmerman, Tim Frahm and Sam Davidson — California Trout, Trout Unlimited — Kurt Zimmerman is Southern Steelhead genetics evince unique documents, intended to help achieve California Regional Manager for characteristics region-by-region (and recovery goals by describing strate - California Trout. Tim Frahm and Sam even watershed-by-watershed), as the gies and recommended actions likely Davidson are California Central Coast fish adapted to the particular condi - required to restore viable wild popula - Steelhead Coordinator and California tions and climate factors of coastal tions. Communications Manager for Trout streams from the Baja Peninsula to In early 2012, after years of public Unlimited. Visit their web sites at: Alaska. Today, steelhead south of San and agency input, NMFS released the www.caltrout.org Mateo County in California are catego - Final Southern California Recovery www.tucalifornia.org rized by the National Marine Fisheries Plan for the SCC steelhead. Later that Service (NMFS) into two “Distinct year, the agency released for public any anglers consider Population Segments” (DPS): the comment a Review Draft of the the steelhead trout (O. “South Central California Coastal” Recovery Plan for the South Central mykiss) the “perfect Coastal steelhead. These two Recovery fish.” Steelhead are Plans identify area-wide threats as widely revered for well as threats specific to particular Mtheir power and grace in the water, and watersheds. Common threats are the Steelhead have for the high challenge of actually three “Ds”: Dams, Diversions and catching one. Sport fishing for steel - declined across much Diminished Aquatic and Riparian head is a major contributor to many Habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Santa Margarita River Arundo Donax Control Project: Development of Methods and Plant Community Response1
    The Santa Margarita River Arundo donax Control Project: Development of Methods and Plant Community Response1 Dawn M. Lawson2, Jesse A. Giessow, and Jason H. Giessow3 Abstract A large-scale effort to control the aggressively invasive exotic species Arundo donax in the Santa Margarita River watershed in California’s south coast ecoregion was initiated in 1997. The project was prompted by the need for Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton to address impacts to habitat for federally-listed endangered species and wetlands regulated by the Army Corps of Engineers. As of 2000, 27 km of the main stem of the Santa Margarita River had been treated. The methods employed were tested in preliminary trials before widespread implementation; additional techniques emerged during the course of the project. Although the primary target is A. donax, 14 other invasive exotic species that also threaten riparian ecosystem functions were treated when encountered. Vegetation-monitoring transects were established in A. donax removal areas to document the effectiveness of the different treatments and recovery of plant communities. A. donax was reduced by over 90 percent after the first treatment and accounted for less than 2 percent absolute cover after three follow-up annual treatments. An experiment testing low-cost methods for establishing woody species after A. donax control was also conducted. Cuttings were installed with no follow-up maintenance. Approximately 30 percent of Baccharis salicifolia and large (3-6 m) willow cuttings survived 2 years. Key words: Arundo donax control, invasive species, riparian restoration, Santa Margarita River Introduction Arundo donax is an invasive, non-native plant seriously impacting much of the riparian habitat throughout coastal California including Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Resources and Groundwater Quality
    Chapter 7: Groundwater Resources and Groundwater Quality Chapter 7 1 Groundwater Resources and 2 Groundwater Quality 3 7.1 Introduction 4 This chapter describes groundwater resources and groundwater quality in the 5 Study Area, and potential changes that could occur as a result of implementing the 6 alternatives evaluated in this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 7 Implementation of the alternatives could affect groundwater resources through 8 potential changes in operation of the Central Valley Project (CVP) and State 9 Water Project (SWP) and ecosystem restoration. 10 7.2 Regulatory Environment and Compliance 11 Requirements 12 Potential actions that could be implemented under the alternatives evaluated in 13 this EIS could affect groundwater resources in the areas along the rivers impacted 14 by changes in the operations of CVP or SWP reservoirs and in the vicinity of and 15 lands served by CVP and SWP water supplies. Groundwater basins that may be 16 affected by implementation of the alternatives are in the Trinity River Region, 17 Central Valley Region, San Francisco Bay Area Region, Central Coast Region, 18 and Southern California Region. 19 Actions located on public agency lands or implemented, funded, or approved by 20 Federal and state agencies would need to be compliant with appropriate Federal 21 and state agency policies and regulations, as summarized in Chapter 4, Approach 22 to Environmental Analyses. 23 Several of the state policies and regulations described in Chapter 4 have resulted 24 in specific institutional and operational conditions in California groundwater 25 basins, including the basin adjudication process, California Statewide 26 Groundwater Elevation Monitoring Program (CASGEM), California Sustainable 27 Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), and local groundwater management 28 ordinances, as summarized below.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 DUNS: 0725288130000
    Las Flores Enhanced Water Reliability Project Grant Applicant: Maugauita Wat€u Distuict Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 DUNS: 0725288130000 Project Manager: Mr. Don Bunts, PE 26111 Antonio Parkway, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 Email: [email protected] Phone: (949) 459-6602 Fax: (949) 589-6243 Submittal Date: March 27, 2019 Submitted to: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation WaterSMART Drought Response Program: Drought Resiliency Projects for FY 2019, FOA No. BOR-DO-19-F003 Table of Contents Mandatory Federal Forms ........................................................................................................................... 3 Technical Proposal and Evaluation Criteria .............................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Background Data ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Location ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Technical Project Description and Milestones .......................................................................................... 6 Performance Measures...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]