Evolution of NAD 83 in the United States: Journey from 2D Toward 4D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution of NAD 83 in the United States: Journey from 2D Toward 4D Evolution of NAD 83 in the United States: Journey from 2D toward 4D Richard A. Snay1 Abstract: In 1986, Canada, Greenland, and the United States adopted the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) to replace the North American Datum of 1927 as their official spatial reference system for geometric positioning. The rigor of the original NAD 83 realization benefited from the extensive use of electronic distance measuring instrumentation and from the use of both TRANSIT Doppler observations and very long baseline interferometry observations. However, the original NAD 83 realization predated the widespread use of the global po- sitioning system and the use of continuously operating reference stations. Consequently, NAD 83 has evolved significantly in the United States since 1986 to embrace these technological advances, as well as to accommodate improvements in the understanding of crustal motion. This paper traces this evolution from what started as essentially a two-dimensional (2D) reference frame and has been progressing toward a four-dimensional (4D) frame. In anticipation of future geodetic advances, the U.S. National Geodetic Survey is planning to replace NAD 83 about a decade from now with a newer, more geocentric spatial reference system for geometric positioning. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943- 5428.0000083. © 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers. CE Database subject headings: History; Datum; Transformations; Geodetic surveys; North America. Author keywords: History; Datum transformations; Dynamic datums; Crustal deformation; NAD 83. Introduction height, and how these three coordinates vary over time. NAD 27 provided a foundation for measuring only geodetic latitude and lon- In 1986 a group of institutions representing Canada, Greenland, and gitude; therefore, it is considered a horizontal datum. NAD 27 was the United States of America adopted the North American Datum of established using triangulation data together with 112 taped baseline 1983 (NAD 83) as their official spatial reference system for geo- lengths to provide scale and 175 astronomic azimuths to provide metric positioning (Schwarz 1989). The National Geodetic Survey orientation. The origin of NAD 27 was established by prescribing (NGS), an office of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric specific values for both the geodetic latitude and longitude of the Administration, represented the United States, where the first NAD reference station in Kansas known as Meades Ranch—a point located 83 realization is referred to as NAD 83 (1986). NAD 83 replaced the near the geographic center of the conterminous United States North American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27), and the NGS has already (CONUS). expressed its intention to replace NAD 83 about a decade from In 1927, the United States’ horizontal reference network contained now with a newer geometric reference system (NGS 2010). Dracup approximately 25,000 reference stations. By 1983, this network had (1989) provides a history of horizontal geodetic control in the United expanded to include approximately 272,000 reference stations. States prior to the adoption of NAD 83. Craymer (2006) discusses NAD 27 served the nation well until electronic distance measuring the evolution of NAD 83 in Canada since its adoption in 1986. (EDM) instrumentation came into widespread usage in the 1960s. Here, the term reference system pertains to an abstract collection EDM instrumentation enabled surveyors and others to measure of principles, fundamental parameters, and specifications for quan- baseline lengths with relative ease and with an accuracy of a few titatively describing the positions of points in space and how these parts per million (ppm). With the existing triangulation network, positions vary over time, whereas the term reference frame pertains geodesists often had to propagate a taped baseline length more than to the materialization or realization of such a system. Traditionally, 100 km via the laws of trigonometry and geometry to compute the a reference frame consists of a network of reference stations on the distance of a baseline connecting a pair of NAD 27 reference sta- ground with adopted positional coordinates (and sometimes veloc- tions. The distance of this same baseline could be measured much ities), which may be used to help determine coordinates for other more accurately with EDM instrumentation. As such, EDM results locations. NAD 83 is a reference system, whereas NAD 83 (1986) is exposed significant regional and local distortions among NAD 27 just one of many reference frames associated with NAD 83. coordinates for reference stations. In some cases, the relative error Modern geometric reference systems are intended to provide a between the NAD 27 coordinates of two separate reference stations foundation for measuring geodetic latitude, longitude, and ellipsoid Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by University of Minnesota - Twin Cities on 10/04/16. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. exceeded 1 m. The 1960s also witnessed the dawning of yet another innovative 1 technology for measuring positional coordinates; namely, the use of Retired; formerly, National Geodetic Survey, 9505 Aspenwood Ct., artificial earth-orbiting satellites. In particular, the U.S. Navy’s Montgomery Village, MD 20886. E-mail: [email protected] TRANSIT Doppler constellation of satellites enabled its users to Note. This manuscript was submitted on November 22, 2011; approved measure the three-dimensional (3D) coordinates of a point relative to on January 30, 2012; published online on February 1, 2012. Discussion period ’ open until April 1, 2013; separate discussions must be submitted for in- the earth s center of mass (hereafter referred to as the geocenter) with dividual papers. This paper is part of the Journal of Surveying Engineering, a precision of approximately 1 m. An earth-based receiver did so by Vol. 138, No. 4, November 1, 2012. ©ASCE, ISSN 0733-9453/2012/4- tracking the Doppler shifts of satellite-transmitted radio signals. The 161e171/$25.00. receiver needed to collect data at a reference station for at least one JOURNAL OF SURVEYING ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER 2012 / 161 J. Surv. Eng., 2012, 138(4): 161-171 week to achieve such meter-level precision. TRANSIT technology illustrates the magnitudes of the two-dimensional (2D) coordinate may seem quite outdated compared with today’s global navigation shifts associated with the transition from NAD 27 to NAD 83 (1986). satellite system (GNSS) technology; however, TRANSIT Doppler The NGS developed the NADCON software (Dewhurst 1990), results were popular back in the 1960s and 1970s. TRANSIT en- which enables users to convert between NAD 27 and NAD 83 (1986) abled geodesists to measure all three spatial dimensions simulta- positional coordinates. Although NAD 83 started as 3D in scope, the neously and in an absolute sense; that is, relative to the geocenter NGS adopted only horizontal coordinates (geodetic latitude and rather than to some arbitrary point such as a reference station located longitude) for over 99% of the approximately 272,000 United States in Kansas. This facilitated various countries, if they so desired, to use reference stations that were involved in its first realization. This first the geocenter as a common origin for their respective reference realization did include a few global positioning system (GPS) systems. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) employed observations; however, this first realization occurred before GPS TRANSIT Doppler observations extensively for establishing the blossomed into the technology that has helped to make the vertical original realization of the World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS 84) dimension economically accessible. (True 2004). Indeed, the NGS and DoD collaborated to make the original NAD 83 coordinates and the original WGS 84 coordinates consistent with each other in the sense that both sets of coordinates GPS Changes Everything are referred to the same origin and share the same orientation and scale. Only a submillimeter difference in the semimajor axis of the Just before the NGS adopted NAD 83 (1986), the agency began chosen reference ellipsoid differentiates the original NAD 83 using GPS, instead of triangulation and/or trilateration, for hori- coordinates from the original WGS 84 coordinates in a systematic zontal positioning. In the 1980s, surveyors, hydrologists, and other way. users of vertical positions somewhat overlooked GPS results be- It was both EDM and TRANSIT Doppler that provided the im- cause they required orthometric heights rather than ellipsoid heights. petus for replacing NAD 27 with NAD 83. The NGS, in collabo- As shown in Fig. 2, an orthometric height, denoted as H, at a location ration with other institutions, performed numerous very high quantifies the distance along the curved plumb line (through that accuracy trilateration surveys with EDM instrumentation and posi- location) above or below the geoid, an equipotential surface ap- tioned 612 reference stations with TRANSIT Doppler observations proximating mean sea level. Orthometric heights depend on the prior to establishing the geocentric NAD 83 reference system. Fig. 1 earth’s gravity field, and these heights are traditionally measured Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by University of Minnesota - Twin Cities on 10/04/16. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. Fig. 1. Magnitude of shifts from NAD 27 horizontal coordinates to NAD 83 (1986) horizontal coordinates 162 / JOURNAL OF SURVEYING ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER 2012 J.
Recommended publications
  • State Plane Coordinate System
    Wisconsin Coordinate Reference Systems Second Edition Published 2009 by the State Cartographer’s Office Wisconsin Coordinate Reference Systems Second Edition Wisconsin State Cartographer’s Offi ce — Madison, WI Copyright © 2015 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System About the State Cartographer’s Offi ce Operating from the University of Wisconsin-Madison campus since 1974, the State Cartographer’s Offi ce (SCO) provides direct assistance to the state’s professional mapping, surveying, and GIS/ LIS communities through print and Web publications, presentations, and educational workshops. Our staff work closely with regional and national professional organizations on a wide range of initia- tives that promote and support geospatial information technologies and standards. Additionally, we serve as liaisons between the many private and public organizations that produce geospatial data in Wisconsin. State Cartographer’s Offi ce 384 Science Hall 550 North Park St. Madison, WI 53706 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (608) 262-3065 Web: www.sco.wisc.edu Disclaimer The contents of the Wisconsin Coordinate Reference Systems (2nd edition) handbook are made available by the Wisconsin State Cartographer’s offi ce at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (Uni- versity) for the convenience of the reader. This handbook is provided on an “as is” basis without any warranties of any kind. While every possible effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information contained in this handbook, the University assumes no responsibilities for any damages or other liability whatsoever (including any consequential damages) resulting from your selection or use of the contents provided in this handbook. Revisions Wisconsin Coordinate Reference Systems (2nd edition) is a digital publication, and as such, we occasionally make minor revisions to this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Part V: the Global Positioning System ______
    PART V: THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM ______________________________________________________________________________ 5.1 Background The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a satellite based, passive, three dimensional navigational system operated and maintained by the Department of Defense (DOD) having the primary purpose of supporting tactical and strategic military operations. Like many systems initially designed for military purposes, GPS has been found to be an indispensable tool for many civilian applications, not the least of which are surveying and mapping uses. There are currently three general modes that GPS users have adopted: absolute, differential and relative. Absolute GPS can best be described by a single user occupying a single point with a single receiver. Typically a lower grade receiver using only the coarse acquisition code generated by the satellites is used and errors can approach the 100m range. While absolute GPS will not support typical MDOT survey requirements it may be very useful in reconnaissance work. Differential GPS or DGPS employs a base receiver transmitting differential corrections to a roving receiver. It, too, only makes use of the coarse acquisition code. Accuracies are typically in the sub- meter range. DGPS may be of use in certain mapping applications such as topographic or hydrographic surveys. DGPS should not be confused with Real Time Kinematic or RTK GPS surveying. Relative GPS surveying employs multiple receivers simultaneously observing multiple points and makes use of carrier phase measurements. Relative positioning is less concerned with the absolute positions of the occupied points than with the relative vector (dX, dY, dZ) between them. 5.2 GPS Segments The Global Positioning System is made of three segments: the Space Segment, the Control Segment and the User Segment.
    [Show full text]
  • HORIZONTAL DATUM CONVERSIONS Helping Vermonters Visualize Choice
    PART 3: SECTION K HORIZONTAL DATUM CONVERSIONS Helping Vermonters Visualize Choice A Discussion, Examples, and Recommended Conversion Methodology for the Transformation of ARC/INFO Coverages from the North American Datum of 1927 to the North American Datum of 1983 in Vermont. This paper would not have been made available without the thoughtful writing of Milo Robinson, NGS Geodetic Advisor to the State of Vermont, and Gary Smith of Green Mountain Geographics. These recognized leaders in the VGIS community have all of our thanks. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This paper outlines the steps required to convert ARC/INFO coverages from the North American Datum of 1927 (NAD27) to the more accurate North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). Until recently, most contemporary maps of Vermont used the NAD27 as the reference datum. This made it the logical option for direct digital conversion and subsequent inclusion in the Vermont GIS database. With the arrival of the new Vermont Digital Orthophotography, expanded GPS activity and new maps from the U.S. Geological Survey being prepared using NAD83, it is increasingly necessary to convert existing NAD27 data to NAD83 to properly incorporate new information. The need of particular data developers or users to convert data depends on the location in the State, and particular mapping requirements. As this paper is released the Vermont counties for which NAD83 digital orthophotos are available are Rutland, Windsor, Franklin, Grand Isle and Addison, plus portions of Washington County. The remainder of Washington and Orange Counties will be available soon, with the remainder of Vermont to be processed in coming years. The remainder of this paper provides more detail on the datum change, suggests new data entry guidelines, details the coordinate and naming convention for Vermont's orthophotos, and provides the procedures for converting Vermont's NAD27 data to NAD83 using software by ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA).
    [Show full text]
  • Datums in Texas NGS: Welcome to Geodesy
    Datums in Texas NGS: Welcome to Geodesy Geodesy is the science of measuring and monitoring the size and shape of the Earth and the location of points on its surface. NOAA's National Geodetic Survey (NGS) is responsible for the development and maintenance of a national geodetic data system that is used for navigation, communication systems, and mapping and charting. ln this subject, you will find three sections devoted to learning about geodesy: an online tutorial, an educational roadmap to resources, and formal lesson plans. The Geodesy Tutorial is an overview of the history, essential elements, and modern methods of geodesy. The tutorial is content rich and easy to understand. lt is made up of 10 chapters or pages (plus a reference page) that can be read in sequence by clicking on the arrows at the top or bottom of each chapter page. The tutorial includes many illustrations and interactive graphics to visually enhance the text. The Roadmap to Resources complements the information in the tutorial. The roadmap directs you to specific geodetic data offered by NOS and NOAA. The Lesson Plans integrate information presented in the tutorial with data offerings from the roadmap. These lesson plans have been developed for students in grades 9-12 and focus on the importance of geodesy and its practical application, including what a datum is, how a datum of reference points may be used to describe a location, and how geodesy is used to measure movement in the Earth's crust from seismic activity. Members of a 1922 geodetic suruey expedition. Until recent advances in satellite technology, namely the creation of the Global Positioning Sysfem (GPS), geodetic surveying was an arduous fask besf suited to individuals with strong constitutions, and a sense of adventure.
    [Show full text]
  • Mind the Gap! a New Positioning Reference
    A new positioning reference Why is the United States adopting NATRF2022? What are we doing about this in Canada? We want to hear from you! • The Canadian Geodetic Survey and the United States • Improved compatibility with Global Navigation • The Canadian Geodetic Survey is working closely National Geodetic Survey have collaborated for Satellite Systems (GNSS), such as GPS, is driving this with the United States National Geodetic Survey in • Send us your comments, the challenges you over a century to provide the fundamental reference change. The geometric reference frames currently defining reference frames to ensure they will also foresee, and any concerns to help inform our path Mind the gap! systems for latitude, longitude and height for their used in Canada and the United States, although be suitable for Canada. forward to either of these organizations: respective countries. compatible with each other, are offset by 2.2 m from • Geodetic agencies from across Canada are A new positioning reference the Earth’s geocentre, whereas GNSS are geocentric. - Canadian Geodetic Survey: nrcan. • Together our reference systems have evolved collaborating on reference system improvements geodeticinformation-informationgeodesique. to meet today’s world of GPS and geographical • Real-time decimetre-level accuracies directly from through the Canadian Geodetic Reference System [email protected] NATRF2022 information systems, while supporting legacy datums GNSS satellites are expected to be available soon. Committee, a working committee of the Canadian
    [Show full text]
  • JHR Final Report Template
    TRANSFORMING NAD 27 AND NAD 83 POSITIONS: MAKING LEGACY MAPPING AND SURVEYS GPS COMPATIBLE June 2015 Thomas H. Meyer Robert Baron JHR 15-327 Project 12-01 This research was sponsored by the Joint Highway Research Advisory Council (JHRAC) of the University of Connecticut and the Connecticut Department of Transportation and was performed through the Connecticut Transportation Institute of the University of Connecticut. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the University of Connecticut or the Connecticut Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. i Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. JHR 15-327 N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Transforming NAD 27 And NAD 83 Positions: Making June 2015 Legacy Mapping And Surveys GPS Compatible 6. Performing Organization Code CCTRP 12-01 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Thomas H. Meyer, Robert Baron JHR 15-327 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) University of Connecticut N/A Connecticut Transportation Institute 11. Contract or Grant No. Storrs, CT 06269-5202 N/A 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Connecticut Department of Transportation Final 2800 Berlin Turnpike 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Newington, CT 06131-7546 CCTRP 12-01 15. Supplementary Notes This study was conducted under the Connecticut Cooperative Transportation Research Program (CCTRP, http://www.cti.uconn.edu/cctrp/).
    [Show full text]
  • Map Projections and Coordinate Systems Datums Tell Us the Latitudes and Longi- Vertex, Node, Or Grid Cell in a Data Set, Con- Tudes of Features on an Ellipsoid
    116 GIS Fundamentals Map Projections and Coordinate Systems Datums tell us the latitudes and longi- vertex, node, or grid cell in a data set, con- tudes of features on an ellipsoid. We need to verting the vector or raster data feature by transfer these from the curved ellipsoid to a feature from geographic to Mercator coordi- flat map. A map projection is a systematic nates. rendering of locations from the curved Earth Notice that there are parameters we surface onto a flat map surface. must specify for this projection, here R, the Nearly all projections are applied via Earth’s radius, and o, the longitudinal ori- exact or iterated mathematical formulas that gin. Different values for these parameters convert between geographic latitude and give different values for the coordinates, so longitude and projected X an Y (Easting and even though we may have the same kind of Northing) coordinates. Figure 3-30 shows projection (transverse Mercator), we have one of the simpler projection equations, different versions each time we specify dif- between Mercator and geographic coordi- ferent parameters. nates, assuming a spherical Earth. These Projection equations must also be speci- equations would be applied for every point, fied in the “backward” direction, from pro- jected coordinates to geographic coordinates, if they are to be useful. The pro- jection coordinates in this backward, or “inverse,” direction are often much more complicated that the forward direction, but are specified for every commonly used pro- jection. Most projection equations are much more complicated than the transverse Mer- cator, in part because most adopt an ellipsoi- dal Earth, and because the projections are onto curved surfaces rather than a plane, but thankfully, projection equations have long been standardized, documented, and made widely available through proven programing libraries and projection calculators.
    [Show full text]
  • FDM 9-20 Spatial Reference Systems
    Facilities Development Manual Wisconsin Department of Transportation Chapter 9 Surveying and Mapping Section 20 Spatial Reference Systems FDM 9-20-1 General February 28, 2001 The discipline of surveying consists of determining or establishing relative positions of points above, on, or beneath the surface of the earth. In Wisconsin, there are two primary spatial reference systems for defining the location of a point: - The U.S. Public Land Survey System (PLSS). - The National Spatial Reference System (NSRS). The PLSS is based on a system of townships, ranges, and sections (see FDM 9-20-5). The PLSS provides the basis for almost all legal descriptions of land. The NSRS, which includes the former National Geodetic Reference System (NGRS), is a mathematical reference system (see FDM 9-20-10). The NSRS consists of precisely measured networks of geodetic control that support accurate mapping over large areas. To understand the roles of these reference systems, it is important to recognize that the PLSS was designed for land ownership purposes but not for accurate mapping, and the NSRS was designed for geodetic surveying and mapping but not for land ownership documentation. Since accurate property maps are becoming essential with digital-based ownership documents, it is important that there be a substantial link between the two reference systems. Methods are needed to utilize the spatial characteristics of the NSRS when addressing the location of landmarks. Fortunately, recent technological developments such as the Global Positioning System (GPS), electronic total station survey instruments, and computer aided drafting (CAD) now make the task of using the PLSS and NSRS together more efficient, economical, and practical.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity and Geoid Modelling for Improved Heights
    Gravity and Geoid Modelling for Improved Heights Texas Height Modernization Workshop Houston, Texas August 28, 2015 Denis Riordan, PSM NOAA, National Geodetic Survey [email protected] Presentation Outline 1. - Introductions. 2. - Mission and Vision of the National Geodetic Survey. 3. - NAVD88 – Still good enough? 4. - GEOIDS – types and definitions. 5. - GRAV-D and what it’s about. 6. - NGS Gravity Survey Plan. 7. - New U.S. Datums for 2022. 8. - Questions. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration National Geodetic Survey Mission: To define, maintain & provide access to the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) to meet our Nation’s economic, social & environmental needs National Spatial Reference System * Latitude * Scale * Longitude * Gravity * Height * Orientation & their variations in time NGS MISSION - The NSRS Define - National Coordinate Sys. (NSRS) Maintain - the NSRS Provide Access The National Geodetic Survey 10 year plan Mission, Vision and Strategy 2013 – 2023 http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/INFO/NGS10yearplan.pdf • Official NGS policy as of Jan 9, 2008 (updated in 2013) – Modernized agency – Attention to accuracy – Attention to time-changes – Improved products and services – Integration with other fed missions • 2022 Targets: – Replace NAD 83 and NAVD 88 – Cm-accuracy access to all coordinates – Customer-focused agency – Global scientific leadership GEODETIC DATUMS VERTICAL 1 D (Orthometric Height) (e.g. NGVD 29, NAVD 88, Tidal) HORIZONTAL 2 D (Latitude and Longitude) (e.g. NAD 27, NAD 83 (1986)) GEOMETRIC 3 D (Latitude, Longitude and Ellipsoid Height) Fixed and Stable - Coordinates seldom change (e.g. NAD 83 (1994), NAD 83 (2007)) also 4 D (Latitude, Longitude, Ellipsoid Height, Velocities) Coordinates change with time (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • CADD Users Manual
    Caltrans English CADD Users Manual 3.3 North American Datum (NAD) 83 A. Description of NAD83 (Taken from the Caltrans Surveys Manual 4.1-2) The sea-level surface of the Earth is called the geoid and is defined as the surface that is perpendicular to the direction of gravity at all points. The geoid is not a mathematically definable geometric shape. It is irregular because the direction of gravity varies from point to point as the result of the irregular distribution of mass within the earth. Because of its irregular non-mathematical shape, the geoid cannot be used for calculations of the relative horizontal positions of points on the earth’s surface. So, a representative geometric surface that approximates the geoid is used to perform positional calculations. The reference surface used for the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) is an ellipsoid named the Geodetic Reference System of 1980 (GRS80). GRS80 is a worldwide best-fit model. It meets the needs of worldwide geodetic systems or the Global Positioning System (GPS). (GRS80 has replaced the Clarke’s Spheroid of 1866 which is a best-fitting model for North America, and which was the reference surface for NAD27.) NAD83 was established by first performing a least squares adjustment of all the observations used to establish the NAD27 network and then redefining the mathematical reference surface from Clarke’s Spheroid to the GRS80. NAD83 has geodetic coordinates that measure 70 to 100 m different from those of NAD27. There is no direct mathematical method to accurately transform coordinates from one system to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Coordinate Systems What Are Map Projections?
    What are map projections? Page 1 of 155 What are map projections? ArcGIS 10 Within ArcGIS, every dataset has a coordinate system, which is used to integrate it with other geographic data layers within a common coordinate framework such as a map. Coordinate systems enable you to integrate datasets within maps as well as to perform various integrated analytical operations such as overlaying data layers from disparate sources and coordinate systems. What is a coordinate system? Coordinate systems enable geographic datasets to use common locations for integration. A coordinate system is a reference system used to represent the locations of geographic features, imagery, and observations such as GPS locations within a common geographic framework. Each coordinate system is defined by: Its measurement framework which is either geographic (in which spherical coordinates are measured from the earth's center) or planimetric (in which the earth's coordinates are projected onto a two-dimensional planar surface). Unit of measurement (typically feet or meters for projected coordinate systems or decimal degrees for latitude–longitude). The definition of the map projection for projected coordinate systems. Other measurement system properties such as a spheroid of reference, a datum, and projection parameters like one or more standard parallels, a central meridian, and possible shifts in the x- and y-directions. Types of coordinate systems There are two common types of coordinate systems used in GIS: A global or spherical coordinate system such as latitude–longitude. These are often referred to file://C:\Documents and Settings\lisac\Local Settings\Temp\~hhB2DA.htm 10/4/2010 What are map projections? Page 2 of 155 as geographic coordinate systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Coordinate Systems, Datums, Spheroids, Prime Meridians, and Angular Units of Measure
    Geographic coordinate systems, datums, spheroids, prime meridians, and angular units of measure Current as of ArcGIS version 9.3 Angular Units of Measure ArcSDE macro ArcObjects macro code name radians / unit PE_U_RADIAN esriSRUnit_Radian 9101 Radian 1.0 PE_U_DEGREE esriSRUnit_Degree 9102 Degree p/180 PE_U_MINUTE esriSRUnit_Minute 9103 Arc–minute (p/180)/60 PE_U_SECOND esriSRUnit_Second 9104 Arc–second (p/180)/3600 PE_U_GRAD esriSRUnit_Grad 9105 Grad p/200 PE_U_GON esriSRUnit_Gon 9106 Gon p/200 PE_U_MICRORADIAN esriSRUnit_Microradian 9109 Microradian 1.0E-6 PE_U_MINUTE_CENTESIMAL esriSRUnit_Minute_Centesimal 9112 Centesimal minute p/20000 PE_U_SECOND_CENTESIMAL esriSRUnit_Second_Centesimal 9113 Centesimal second p/2000000 PE_U_MIL_6400 esriSRUnit_Mil_6400 9114 Mil p/3200 Spheroids Macro Code Name a (m) 1/f esriSRSpheroid_Airy1830 7001 Airy 1830 6377563.396 299.3249646 esriSRSpheroid_ATS1977 7041 ATS 1977 6378135.0 298.257 esriSRSpheroid_Australian 7003 Australian National 6378160 298.25 esriSRSpheroid_AuthalicSphere 7035 Authalic sphere (WGS84) 6371000 0 esriSRSpheroid_AusthalicSphereArcInfo 107008 Authalic sph (ARC/INFO) 6370997 0 esriSRSpheroid_AusthalicSphere_Intl1924 7057 Authalic sph (Int'l 1924) 6371228 0 esriSRSpheroid_Bessel1841 7004 Bessel 1841 6377397.155 299.1528128 esriSRSpheroid_BesselNamibia 7006 Bessel Namibia 6377483.865 299.1528128 esriSRSpheroid_Clarke1858 7007 Clarke 1858 6378293.639 294.2606764 esriSRSpheroid_Clarke1866 7008 Clarke 1866 6378206.4 294.9786982 esriSRSpheroid_Clarke1866Michigan 7009 Clarke 1866 Michigan
    [Show full text]