DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Further Mathematics Support Programme Pilot: Interim Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Further Mathematics Support Programme Pilot: Interim Report Ymchwil gymdeithasol Social research Number: 79/2013 Evaluation of Further Mathematics Support Programme Pilot: Interim Report 1 Evaluation of Further Mathematics Support Programme Pilot: Interim Report Claire Kerby, Kerry Lewis, Nick Miller, Miller Research (UK) Ltd Views expressed in this report are those of the researcher and not necessarily those of the Welsh Government For further information please contact: Sara James Knowledge and Analytical Services Welsh Government Cathays Park Cardiff CF10 3NQ Tel: 0300 025 6812 [email protected] Welsh Government Social Research, 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4734-0788-6 © Crown Copyright, 2013 Table of Contents 1 Background to the Study 4 2 Key Findings and Recommendations from the Study 18 3 Approach to the Evaluation 29 4 Detailed Findings - Structure of the FMSP Pilot 43 5 Detailed Findings. 48 6 Outcomes and Impacts 67 Appendix 1: Questioning Framework and Data Sources 95 Appendix 2: Topic Guides 108 Appendix 3: List of Schools and Colleges Visited 149 Appendix 4: Results of Online Survey of HE Students 150 Appendix 5: Results of Online Survey of School and College Staff 161 Appendix 6: Suggested Format for Management Reports 176 2 Glossary of acronyms A2 An examination which, in combination with an AS, forms a full A Level qualification AES Advanced Extension Award AS Advanced Subsidiary (A standalone qualification that also forms half of a full A Level qualification) FEI Further Education Institution FMSP Further Mathematics Support Programme HEI Higher Education Institution HESA Higher Education Statistics Agency JCQ Joint Council for Qualifications LLWR Lifelong Learning Wales Record MEI Mathematics in Education and Industry STEM Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics STEP Sixth Term Examination Paper WED Welsh Education Database WIMCS Wales Institute of Mathematics and Computational Sciences 3 1.1 1 Background to the Study Introduction 1.1 This is the first of two reports from an evaluation of the Further Mathematics Support Programme (FMSP) pilot. This first report presents findings from a process evaluation of the pilot and early indications of its impact. The second report is due for publication in the autumn of 2014. 1.2 The pilot has been funded to a total of £581,485 between 2010 and 2014 from Welsh Government and has been managed by the Wales Institute of Mathematical and Computational Sciences (WIMCS). 1.3 The FMSP initially covered Carmarthenshire, Neath Port Talbot, Pembrokeshire and Swansea and was originally intended to run between July 2010 and October 2013; however, in early 2013, the decision was taken to expand and prolong the pilot. From April 2013, FMSP support has also been provided in Anglesey, Conwy, Gwynedd and Rhondda Cynon Taf and the pilot programme has been extended for an additional year. 1.4 The aims of the FMSP Wales are to: Raise awareness among students and their parents of the value of studying mathematics at higher levels; Increase the number of students in Wales studying AS/A2 Level Mathematics and Further Mathematics; Increase the number of schools and colleges in Wales offering further mathematics; Increase the number of students from Wales applying to study higher education courses in mathematics and mathematically-rich subjects such as Engineering, Physics, IT, Finance and Economics; Improve the transition of students from further to higher education courses in mathematics or courses which have a significant element of mathematics thus benefiting the wider economy. 4 1.5 Support offered to schools and colleges through the FMSP Wales includes: Student tuition for AS/A Level Further Mathematics; Free single user teacher access to the Mathematics in Education and Industry (MEI) Resources Website (supporting all AS/A2 Level Further Mathematics specifications plus Additional Mathematics and GCSE extension resources); Mathematics enrichment courses for students in Key Stage 4 and post- 16, such as mathematics master classes, mathematics career talks and revision events; AS and A2 Mathematics and Further Mathematics revision days. The evaluation 1.6 The evaluation set out to provide an assessment of both the process and impacts of the pilot to date, through: examining the effectiveness of the monitoring processes and governance arrangements, and the specific targeted events, activities and resources that the programme provides Setting out the extent to which the pilot is meeting its objectives, as set out in paragraph 1.4, looking particularly at the following: (i) The contribution of the programme in increasing the number of students studying GCE further mathematics; attainment levels in the subject and applications to higher education courses in mathematics and mathematically-rich subjects (ii) The contribution of the programme in increasing the number of institutions offering further mathematics and the number of mathematics teachers in the pilot area (iii) Making comparisons, in relation to achievement of the programme’s objectives, between the pilot area and areas where similar programmes do not exist (iv) The wider economic benefits of the FMSP and the vale for money it offers. 5 1.7 Most of the evaluation work took place in the 12 month period from September 2012 and included both qualitative and quantitative approaches to fieldwork, underpinned by extensive desk research and interrogation of existing datasets. Approaches to the counterfactual (i.e. what would have happened in the absence of the pilot) were trialled, using spatial comparisons, (pilot area vs Wales, England and Northern Ireland) and time series (pre-pilot and during pilot). 1.8 Originally, the evaluation also set out to explore the wider economic benefits of studying further mathematics. As the evaluation progressed it became clear that these were not the key issues to be resolved as the wider economic benefits of studying further mathematics were already recognised both here and in England. The elements of the evaluation that focused on the process and impact of the programme were therefore given prominence. 1.9 This interim report sets out the findings from the fieldwork, desk research and data analysis during 2012-13. The final impact evaluation report in Autumn 2014 will set out results of analysis of a further year’s FMSP participation data, full 2013 examination entry and attainment data, 2013- 14 information from HESA regarding uptake of STEM subjects in HE and further analysis of gender issues and links back to GCSE performance of further mathematics students. The final report will draw together findings and recommendations from the whole evaluation, and will be published in the autumn of 2014. Rationale for the pilot UK Context 1.10 Between the late 1980s and the late 1990s the number of students in the UK taking further mathematics at Advanced Level fell by approximately two thirds1. The growing popularity of modern and often more vocationally- 1 The Economist, September 21st 2006: http://www.economist.com/node/7950110?story_id=7950110 6 oriented A Levels2 contributed to falling demand from students for this traditionally difficult subject. In many cases smaller class sizes made it difficult for schools to justify the viability of delivering A Level Further Mathematics. These factors led to many schools dropping the subject altogether. 1.11 The trend of decline has been reversed, however, with growing interest across the UK in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) subjects over the last decade. The numbers of pupils in the UK studying A Level Further Mathematics started to increase dramatically, so that by 2006 further mathematics was the fastest-growing subject at A Level3 in the UK and numbers have continued to rise to date. This is likely to reflect increasing emphasis on the potential career benefits to students of studying STEM4 subjects compared with some arts and humanities subjects and also changing attitudes of HEIs towards the subject. In addition, research such as that carried out by the Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education in 2011 into the mathematical needs of both universities and the workplace noted a range of ways in which employers increasingly needed people with competent mathematics skills5. Particular skills included: The ability to communicate mathematical concepts, calculations and results to colleagues The ability to understand and interpret information produced by computer-generated analyses, and The ability to apply theoretical mathematical concepts in a range of familiar and unfamiliar contexts. 1.12 State-funded schools (particularly comprehensives) in the UK have historically been far less likely to offer A Level Further Mathematics than private sector competitors, primarily due to timetabling and staffing issues.6 2 For example Media Studies and ICT 3 The Economist, September 21st 2006. (op cit) 4 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics 5 Mathematical Needs Mathematics in the workplace and in Higher Education, ACME, June 2011 6 Evaluation of the MEI Further Mathematics Network, Initial Report, Durham University, 2006 7 However, this too is changing, with particular growth in state sector support for the subject. Development of the Further Mathematics Support Programme in England 1.13 In 2004, the Further Mathematics Network (FMN) was established in England, in recognition of the risk that students in state-funded schools were potentially disadvantaged in terms of higher education access and career prospects, because of a lack of opportunity to study A Level Further Mathematics. 1.14
Load more

Recommended publications
  • People, Places and Policy
    People, Places and Policy Set within the context of UK devolution and constitutional change, People, Places and Policy offers important and interesting insights into ‘place-making’ and ‘locality-making’ in contemporary Wales. Combining policy research with policy-maker and stakeholder interviews at various spatial scales (local, regional, national), it examines the historical processes and working practices that have produced the complex political geography of Wales. This book looks at the economic, social and political geographies of Wales, which in the context of devolution and public service governance are hotly debated. It offers a novel ‘new localities’ theoretical framework for capturing the dynamics of locality-making, to go beyond the obsession with boundaries and coterminous geog- raphies expressed by policy-makers and politicians. Three localities – Heads of the Valleys (north of Cardiff), central and west coast regions (Ceredigion, Pembrokeshire and the former district of Montgomeryshire in Powys) and the A55 corridor (from Wrexham to Holyhead) – are discussed in detail to illustrate this and also reveal the geographical tensions of devolution in contemporary Wales. This book is an original statement on the making of contemporary Wales from the Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research, Data and Methods (WISERD) researchers. It deploys a novel ‘new localities’ theoretical framework and innovative mapping techniques to represent spatial patterns in data. This allows the timely uncovering of both unbounded and fuzzy relational policy geographies, and the more bounded administrative concerns, which come together to produce and reproduce over time Wales’ regional geography. The Open Access version of this book, available at www.tandfebooks.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 3.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodlands for Wales Indicators 2014-15
    Woodlands for Wales Indicators 2014-15 SDR: 204/2015 Woodlands for Wales Indicators 2014 -15 16 December 2015 This is the sixth indicators report since the revision in March 2009 of Woodlands for Wales, the Welsh Government’s strategy for woodlands and trees. The aim of the indicators is to monitor progress towards achieving the 20 high level outcomes described in Woodlands for Wales. Many of the indicators relate to more than one of the high level outcomes. As some aspects of woodlands and trees change slowly, some indicators are not updated every year, but instead every two, three, or five years, in line with the reporting programme of the National Forest Inventory and some Natural Resources Wales surveys. Some information is only available for limited periods or areas, while for some indicators there is only a baseline figure at present. A few of the indicators are still under development and reporting against these should occur in future years. For more information on the quality of the statistics and the definitions used please refer to the ‘Key Quality Information’ and ‘Glossary’ sections towards the end of the bulletin. Key points The area of woodland in Wales has increased over the last thirteen years and is now 306,000 hectares. The amount of new planting increased between 2009 and 2014 when a total of 3,289 hectares were planted, but the rate of planting fell back in 2015 to 103 hectares. The forestry sector in Wales has an annual Gross Value Added (GVA) of £499.3 million and employs between 8,500 and 11,300 people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four Health Systems of the United Kingdom: How Do They Compare?
    The four health systems of the United Kingdom: how do they compare? Gwyn Bevan, Marina Karanikolos, Jo Exley, Ellen Nolte, Sheelah Connolly and Nicholas Mays Source report April 2014 About this research This report is the fourth in a series dating back to 1999 which looks at how the publicly financed health care systems in the four countries of the UK have fared before and after devolution. The report was commissioned jointly by The Health Foundation and the Nuffield Trust. The research team was led by Nicholas Mays at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The research looks at how the four national health systems compare and how they have performed in terms of quality and productivity before and after devolution. The research also examines performance in North East England, which is acknowledged to be the region that is most comparable to Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland in terms of socioeconomic and other indicators. This report, along with an accompanying summary report, data appendices, digital outputs and a short report on the history of devolution (to be published later in 2014), are available to download free of charge at www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/compare-uk-health www.health.org.uk/compareUKhealth. Acknowledgements We are grateful: to government statisticians in the four countries for guidance on sources of data, highlighting problems of comparability and for checking the data we have used; for comments on the draft report from anonymous referees and from Vernon Bogdanor, Alec Morton and Laura Schang; and for guidance on national clinical audits from Nick Black and on nursing data from Jim Buchan.
    [Show full text]
  • Wales: Governance, Policy and 7
    Secondary schools in Wales: governance, policy and 7. 6 curriculum Susan Lewis, David Grace and Susan Capel Introduction Education in Wales developed historically along similar lines to that of England, with legislation mostly having force in both countries. However, since devolution to a Welsh Assembly in 1999, education became the responsibility of the Welsh Assembly Government under Schedule 5 of the Government of Wales Act 2006. The National Assembly for Wales has control over education policy, although the Westminster government retains control of pay, conditions and pensions. Since 1999, education in Wales has diverged more from England and is set to continue to do so. Over time, education in Wales is developing a distinct identity. This unit focuses on the current governance, structure of schooling, curriculum and teacher education in Wales. A unit comparing education in the four home countries of the United Kingdom in the sixth edition of this book (2013), also included on this website, provides a very brief historical overview and enables you to compare education in Wales with education in England, Northern Ireland and Scotland at that time. The first part of the unit focuses on governance of education in Wales. It then looks at the current structure of schooling in Wales before focusing on the current National Curriculum, as implemented in state-maintained primary and secondary schools in Wales. The unit then focuses on teacher education in Wales. Two major reports have been published recently, concerned with the future direction of the school curriculum (Donaldson 2015) and teacher education (Furlong 2015), respectively. Some consideration is given to the proposals in these reports in the relevant section of the unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality Issues in Wales: a Research Review
    Research report: 11 Equality issues in Wales: a research review Victoria Winckler (editor) The Bevan Foundation Equality issues in Wales: a research review Victoria Winckler (editor) The Bevan Foundation © Equality and Human Rights Commission 2009 First published Spring 2009 ISBN 978 1 84206 089 6 Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series The Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series publishes research carried out for the Commission by commissioned researchers. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission. The Commission is publishing the report as a contribution to discussion and debate. Please contact the Research Team for further information about other Equality and Human Rights Commission’s research reports, or visit our website: Research Team Equality and Human Rights Commission Arndale House Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0161 829 8500 Website: www.equalityhumanrights.com You can download a copy of this report as a PDF from our website: www.equalityhumanrights.com/researchreports If you require this publication in an alternative format, please contact the Communications Team to discuss your needs at: [email protected] CONTENTS Page CHAPTER AUTHORS i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 This Report 1 1.2 Demography of Wales 2 1.3 Governance of Wales 12 1.4 Devolution and Equality 13 1.5 Conclusion 17 2. POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION 18 2.1 Policy Context 18 2.2 Household Income and Poverty 19 2.3 Benefits and Pensions 28 2.4 Savings, Credit and Debt, and Financial Exclusion 31 2.5 Water and Fuel Poverty 35 2.6 Digital Inclusion 37 2.7 Culture, Leisure and Sport 38 2.8 Access to Advice, Support and Justice 42 2.9 Transport 44 2.10 Conclusions and Research Gaps 51 3.
    [Show full text]
  • After PISA: a Way Forward for Education in Wales? David Egan | January 2017
    After PISA: A way forward for education in Wales? David Egan | January 2017 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction: Education in Wales since Devolution .......................................... 3 1.1. From ‘The Learning Country’ to ‘the GERM’ .................................................... 3 1.2. Progress and consequences ............................................................................ 5 1.3. The state of the nation ..................................................................................... 7 2. The Challenge ....................................................................................................... 9 2.1. An inequitable education system ..................................................................... 9 2.2. The ecology of poverty in Wales .................................................................... 10 2.3. Welsh Government strategies for tackling the impact of poverty ................... 11 3. Back to the Learning Country ........................................................................... 13 3.1. A new model of school improvement ............................................................. 13 3.2. Reducing the impact of poverty ...................................................................... 14 3.3. The Role of Families ...................................................................................... 15 3.4. The importance of communities ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Evidence of Inequalities in Access to Healthcare Services for Disabled People in Wales
    Ymchwil gymdeithasol Social research Rhif/Number: 55/2015 Review of Evidence of Inequalities in Access to Healthcare Services for Disabled People in Wales Review of Evidence of Inequalities in Access to Healthcare Services for Disabled People in Wales Shaun Smith ESRC PhD Internship Scheme This research was produced as part of a four month-long PhD Internship with the Welsh Government, funded jointly by the Welsh Government and the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). The ESRC was not involved in the study’s design, collection of data, analysis or writing of the report. Views expressed in this report are those of the researcher and not necessarily those of the Welsh Government. For further information please contact: Joanne Coates Social Research and Information Division Knowledge and Analytical Services Welsh Government Cathays Park Cardiff, CF10 3NQ Tel/Ffôn: 02920 825540 Email/Ebost: [email protected] Welsh Government Social Research, 15 October 2015 ISBN: 978-1-4734-4870-4 © Crown Copyright 2015 All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0 , except where otherwise stated. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 6 Introduction.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband Services in Wales
    House of Commons Welsh Affairs Committee Broadband services in Wales First Report of Session 2012–13 HC 580 Incorporating HC 1367-i-iii, Session 2010-12 House of Commons Welsh Affairs Committee Broadband services in Wales First Report of Session 2012–13 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 11 September 2012 HC 580 Incorporating HC 1367-i-iii, Session 2010-12 Published on 17 September 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Welsh Affairs Committee The Welsh Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Office of the Secretary of State for Wales (including relations with the National Assembly for Wales). Current membership David T.C. Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) (Chair) Stuart Andrew MP (Conservative, Pudsey) Guto Bebb MP (Conservative, Aberconwy) Geraint Davies MP (Labour, Swansea West) Jonathan Edwards MP (Plaid Cymru, Carmarthen East and Dinefwr) Nia Griffith MP (Labour, Llanelli) Mrs Siân C. James MP (Labour, Swansea East) Susan Elan Jones MP (Labour, Clwyd South) Karen Lumley MP (Conservative, Redditch) Jessica Morden MP (Labour, Newport East) Mr Robin Walker MP (Conservative, Worcester) Mr Mark Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Ceredigion) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • End of Year Report 2009-2010 WALES GENE PARK END of YEAR REPORT 2009 - 2010
    End of Year Report 2009-2010 WALES GENE PARK END OF YEAR REPORT 2009 - 2010 Foreword The Wales Gene Park supports medical genetic research and its translation to advances in healthcare, delivers education and facilitates engagement in genetic issues in the NHS and with the public. Through its work it seeks to ensure that the many opportunities presented by new genetic knowledge and technologies are seized in Wales. Genetics is integral to many areas of modern medicine and much of the research and translation and professional education undertaken by the Wales Gene Park occurs at the interface between medical genetics and mainstream medical specialities. It supports development of DNA analysis that forms a major strand of modern diagnosis for both inherited and acquired disease and that is often critical to the provision of appropriate treatment. It also supports the development of genetic approaches to identify those at risk of disease enabling earlier intervention and improved outcomes. Our work with the wider public serves several purposes. It helps patients and families affected by genetic disorders to influence the development of health services, health policies and the research agenda. It brings young people at school face to face with the issues and opportunities raised by genetics. These young people are the future scientists and health care providers for Wales. Their enthusiasm and insightful engagement is hugely encouraging. During the current year the Wales Assembly Government renewed its funding for the Wales Gene Park for a further 5 years. The Wales Gene Park will use its resources to ensure that Wales continues to punch far above its weight in this fast moving area of biomedical science.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Market Report 2012: Wales
    Communications Market Report: Wales Research Document Publication date: 18 July 2012 Introduction This is Ofcom’s seventh annual review of the communications market in Wales. The report offers a detailed overview of communications services across the nation and monitors key trends in the availability and take-up of digital services across Wales. In 2011, total spend by the BBC and ITV1 on first-run originated TV programming specifically for viewers in Wales was up 3% to £27m, the only year-on-year increase among the four nations. This has been driven by an increase of 7% spent on non-news programming. Expenditure per head of the population in Wales increased by 2% to £8.79 in 2011 and the number of first-run originated hours specifically for viewers in Wales also increased by 1%. S4C spent a total of £73m on first-run Welsh language programming in 2011, an 8% decrease on 2010 in nominal terms, but the total number of hours broadcast by S4C increased by 3%. Over the past year, broadband take-up has remained stable but there remain significant variations by demographic group. Broadband take-up is lowest among over-55s and DE households. This year’s report has also analysed fixed broadband take-up in the South Wales Valleys, confirming that take-up is relatively low in comparison to Cardiff and Newport. Mobile phone ownership increased by five percentage points to 92% in Wales in the year to Q1 2012. Take-up of smartphones increased significantly throughout the UK over the same period, with Wales experiencing a 14 percentage point increase in ownership to 39% over the period, in line with the UK average.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Boundaries: Citizen-Centred Local Services for Wales 6
    Review of Local Service Delivery: Report to the Welsh Assembly Government Beyond Boundaries Citizen-Centred Local Services for Wales G/079/06-07 June Typeset in 12pt ISBN 0 7504 4089 9 CMK-22-19-004 © Crown copyright 2006 Review of Local Service Delivery: Report to the Welsh Assembly Government Beyond Boundaries Citizen-Centred Local Services for Wales II Foreword Foreword “When the Stranger says: ‘What is the meaning of this city?’ ‘Do you huddle close together because you love each other?’ What will you answer? ‘We all dwell together To make money from each other?’ or ‘This is a community?’” T. S. Eliot, ‘The Rock’ When the First Minister asked me to chair a review of local public service delivery in Wales, I was conscious of the limited knowledge I had of the country and its governance, but attracted by its collaborative ethos and its determination to find its own distinctive path to economic, environmental and social improvement. Nine months on (at the time of writing), and after attempting to absorb much written material and talking and listening to hundreds of people, I remain aware that my understanding is far from complete. I have been fortunate in enjoying the support, experience and tolerance of the other team members, Sir Adrian Webb and Dame Gill Morgan, our adviser Professor Steve Martin, and a small but fiercely dedicated secretariat all of whom have contributed enormously; this report is itself an example of collaborative working. We have all been impressed by the candour and commitment of a wide range of interlocutors, from the Welsh Assembly Government, the Welsh Local Government Association, non-devolved agencies, local councils, local health boards, NHS trusts, community councils, the private, voluntary and community sectors, officials, councillors and Assembly Members.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit and Fair Movement of People
    Brexit and Fair Movement of People Securing Wales’ Future Securing Wales’ Future | 1 Contents Preface from the Cabinet First Minister’s Secretary for Finance Foreword and Local Government 1 Page 4 2 Page 5 Background, Context Summary and Definitions 3 Page 6 4 Page 9 A Picture of Migration Future Policy and its Effects in Wales Considerations 5 Page 13 6 Page 26 Conclusion Annex A 7 Page 35 8 Page 37 Annex B Annex C 9 Page 41 10 Page 49 Annex D Annex E 11 Page 73 12 Page 79 © Hawlfraint y Goron / Crown copyright 2017 WG31924 ISBN digidol / Digital ISBN 978-1-4734-9831-0 ISBN argraffu / Print ISBN 978-1-78859-580-3 1 First Minister’s Foreword The way in which the UK In our White Paper, ‘Securing effectively, and fair to those Government deals with the issue Wales’ Future’, we set out an across our country who feel of migration to and from the approach which would allow vulnerable to what is seen as European Union (EU) is critical Wales and the UK to continue competition for work, benefits to securing the right outcome of to benefit from inward migration and public services. the UK’s negotiations on leaving while taking on board these the EU – an outcome that is right concerns. It is an approach for all parts of the UK, and which consistent, we believe, with our reflects the varying and specific top priority of securing continued needs across the devolved full and unfettered access to the nations and English regions. Single Market.
    [Show full text]