Deepwater Gulf of Mexico 2004: America's Expanding Frontier

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Deepwater Gulf of Mexico 2004: America's Expanding Frontier ERRATA Figure 1 P. 4, The colored areas marked as “Royalty Relief Zones” are water-depth zones that correspond with Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (DWRRA) water depths. Not all leases within a colored area are eligible for royalty relief due to the different vintage leases included in the area. In addition, please note that the colored areas extend past the official royalty relief area authorized by the DWRRA and that leases east of 87 degrees, 30 minutes West longitude in the Eastern Planning Area are not eligible for royalty relief. P. 112, last line, “51%” should read “48%.” Appendix B P. 125, line 2, clarification: the Pardner project may appear to be the first deepwater discovery because it was combined with a field discovered in water depths less than 1,000 ft. The shallow-water portion of the WD152 field was indeed discovered in 1968, but the deepwater portion of the field (the Pardner project) was not drilled until 2002. Appendix H P. 150, line 12, column 5: “2.7” should read “12.7.” P. 150, line 13, column 5: “3.4” should read “13.4.” P. 150, line 14, column 5: “2.8” should read “12.8.” ON COVER – The cover features four images of the deepwater frontier (top to bottom). Transocean’s deepwater drillship Discoverer Deep Seas, which set a world record drilling in 10,011 ft of water at ChevronTexaco’s Toledo prospect (photo courtesy of Transocean). A sperm whale surfaces near BP’s Horn Mountain spar and Heerema’s construction vessel Balder (photo courtesy of Christopher Richter). The Na Kika semisubmersible, installed by Shell and operated by BP, which will gather production from six subsea projects by the end of 2004 (photo courtesy of Shell International Exploration and Production Inc. and BP). An artist’s rendering of subsea equipment installed at a deepwater location (image courtesy of Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.). OCS Report MMS 2004-021 Deepwater Gulf of Mexico 2004: America’s Expanding Frontier Authors G. Ed Richardson Leanne S. French Richie D. Baud Robert H. Peterson Carla D. Roark Tara M. Montgomery Eric G. Kazanis G. Michael Conner Michael P. Gravois Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service New Orleans Gulf of Mexico OCS Region May 2004 Table of Contents Page PREFACE....................................................................................................................................................xi INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................................................................3 Definitions..............................................................................................................................................3 Expanding Frontier.................................................................................................................................5 Seismic Activity .....................................................................................................................................6 Exploration Activity ...............................................................................................................................6 Leasing Activity ...................................................................................................................................13 Environmental Activity ........................................................................................................................21 Ocean Current Monitoring ...................................................................................................................23 Challenges and Rewards ......................................................................................................................26 LEASING ...................................................................................................................................................37 Bidding and Leasing Trends.................................................................................................................37 Lease Ownership ..................................................................................................................................42 Future Lease Activity ...........................................................................................................................42 DRILLING AND DEVELOPMENT..........................................................................................................47 Drilling Activity ...................................................................................................................................47 Development Systems ..........................................................................................................................58 Subsea Trends.......................................................................................................................................70 New Pipelines.......................................................................................................................................70 RESERVES AND PRODUCTION ............................................................................................................75 Discoveries ...........................................................................................................................................75 Reserve Potential..................................................................................................................................82 Production Trends ................................................................................................................................84 Companies and Production...................................................................................................................90 Production Rates...................................................................................................................................90 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................101 Development Cycle ............................................................................................................................101 Drilling the Lease Inventory...............................................................................................................107 Expanding Frontier.............................................................................................................................111 CONTRIBUTING PERSONNEL.............................................................................................................115 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................................................117 iii Table of Contents — continued Page APPENDICES ..........................................................................................................................................119 Appendix A. Announced Deepwater Discoveries (Sorted by Project Name). .................................119 Appendix B. Announced Deepwater Discoveries (Sorted by Discovery Date). ..............................125 Appendix C. Chronological Listing of GOM Lease Sales by Sale Location and Sale Date............131 Appendix D. Deepwater Studies Program........................................................................................133 Appendix E. Companies Defined as Majors in this Report. ............................................................135 Appendix F. Number of Deepwater Production Facilities Installed Each Year (including Plans through 2006)...................................................................................139 Appendix G. Subsea Completions....................................................................................................140 Appendix H. Average Annual GOM Oil and Gas Production. ........................................................149 iv Figures Page Figure 1. The Gulf of Mexico OCS is divided into Western, Central, and Eastern Planning Areas. Water-depth categories used in this report are shown in addition to shaded Deep Water Royalty Relief Act zones.................................................................................... 4 Figure 2. Progressive deepwater 3-D seismic permit coverage. ............................................................ 7 Figure 3. Deepwater Gulf of Mexico 3-D seismic permit coverage from 1992 to 2003........................ 9 Figure 4. Pre-stack depth migration coverage from various industry sources. .................................... 10 Figure 5. Stratigraphic chart highlighting new play potential.............................................................. 11 Figure 6. Frontier plays in the deepwater GOM. ................................................................................. 11 Figure 7. Location of known gas hydrates in the Gulf of Mexico. ...................................................... 14 Figure 8. Gas hydrates on the seafloor in Green Canyon Block 185 (photo courtesy of GERG/Texas A&M University)............................................................. 15 Figure 9. Deepwater leases issued in the Gulf of Mexico.................................................................... 16 Figure 10. Active leases in the Gulf of Mexico. ...................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Shell and the Technip-Samsung Consortium Take Next Step on Prelude Floating LNG Facility
    Shell and the Technip-Samsung consortium take next step on Prelude floating LNG facility March 9, 2010 Yesterday, Shell signed two contracts with the Technip and Samsung Heavy Industries consortium for the Prelude floating liquefied natural gas (LNG) project off the coast of Western Australia. These contracts formalize the announcement made by Shell in October 2009 that Prelude is in the engineering and design phase of development. The first contract covers the front-end engineering design (FEED) elements specific to the Prelude project, taking into account the composition of the gas, local weather conditions and other site specific factors. The second contract details the terms under which the floating LNG facility would be built, if the final investment decision for the Prelude project is made. Planning for Prelude is progressing well. Yesterday's signing follows a July 2009 master agreement between Shell and the Technip-Samsung consortium to work on the design, construction and installation of multiple floating LNG facilities over a period of up to 15 years. The floating design will allow Shell to place gas liquefaction facilities directly over offshore gas fields, precluding the need for long-distance pipelines and extensive onshore infrastructure. This provides a commercially attractive approach for developing offshore fields. Notes to Editors Royal Dutch Shell plc is a leading global energy company whose subsidiaries employ 102,000 people and operate in more than 100 countries and territories. Shell engages in the exploration and production of oil and natural gas, the refining and marketing of transportation fuels and other oil products, the production of chemicals and the development of renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Rum (1965)
    TesioPower jadehorse Red Rum (1965) ORME 11 ORBY Rhoda B 26 The Boss Meteor 1 Southern Cross Resplendent 24 Golden Boss (1920) TADCASTER Chevele D'Or Chevil Grove 4 Golden Hen Hazlehatch 11 Hazlehen Sylvan Lake 19 Gold Bridge (1929) ORME 11 ORBY Rhoda B 26 Diadumenos Donovan 7 Donnetta Rinovata 2 Flying Diadem (1923) LOVE WISELY 11 Bridge Of Canny Santa Brigida 8 Flying Bridge HAMPTON 10 Gadfly Merry Duchess 22 Vilmorin (1943) CYLLENE 9 POLYMELUS Maid Marian 3 PHALARIS SAINFOIN 2 Bromus Cheery 1 Fairway (1925) ST SIMON 11 CHAUCER Canterbury Pilgrim 1 SCAPA FLOW LOVE WISELY 11 Anchora Eryholme 13 Queen Of The Meadows (1938) Kendal 16 Tredennis St Marguerite 4 Bachelor's Double Le Noir 29 Lady Bawn Milady 21 Queen Of The Blues (1929) GALLINULE 19 Great Sport Gondolette 6 Blue Fairy Troutbeck 16 Vanish Grey Lady 7 Quorum (1954) ST SIMON 11 CHAUCER Canterbury Pilgrim 1 Prince Chimay GALLINULE 19 Gallorette Orlet 8 Vatout (1926) Le Roi Soleil 5 Sans Souci II Sanctimony 3 Vasthi Beppo 2 Vaya Waterhen 3 Bois Roussel (1935) Musket 3 CARBINE The Mersey 2 Spearmint Minting 1 Maid Of The Mint Warble 1 Plucky Liege (1912) Galopin 3 ST SIMON St Angela 11 Concertina Petrarch 10 Comic Song Frivolity 16 Akimbo (1947) ST SIMON 11 Desmond L'Abbesse De Jouarre 16 Hapsburg AMPHION 12 Altesse Marchioness 20 Noble Star (1927) ROI HERODE 1 Herodote Simonette 8 Hesper Prince Palatine 1 Amourette Lady Comfey 7 Bulolo (1934) BONA VISTA 4 CYLLENE Arcadia 9 POLYMELUS HAMPTON 10 Maid Marian Quiver 3 Pussy Willow (1921) ST SIMON 11 WILLIAM THE THIRD Gravity 2 Willesha
    [Show full text]
  • Deepwater Mobile Oil Rigs in the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Uncertainty of Coastal State Jurisdiction Rebecca K
    Journal of International Business and Law Volume 10 | Issue 2 Article 10 2011 Deepwater Mobile Oil Rigs in the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Uncertainty of Coastal State Jurisdiction Rebecca K. Richards Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/jibl Recommended Citation Richards, Rebecca K. (2011) "Deepwater Mobile Oil Rigs in the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Uncertainty of Coastal State Jurisdiction," Journal of International Business and Law: Vol. 10: Iss. 2, Article 10. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/jibl/vol10/iss2/10 This Notes & Student Works is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of International Business and Law by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Richards: Deepwater Mobile Oil Rigs in the Exclusive Economic Zone and the DEEPWATER MOBILE OIL RIGS IN THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE AND THE UNCERTAINTY OF COASTAL STATE JURISDICTION Rebecca K. Richards* I. INTRODUCTION The involvement of a deepwater mobile oil rig in the April 2010 BP oil spill disaster in the United States exclusive economic zone ("EEZ") in the Gulf of Mexico forcefully demonstrated the potential that deepwater mobile oil rigs have to cause catastrophic harm to the coastal state in ways not presented by fixed oil rigs operating in shallow water.' Though coastal states have this great risk of catastrophic harm, their plenary jurisdiction over deepwa- ter mobile oil rigs is currently uncertain. 2 The vagueness of coastal state jurisdictional author- ity over these rigs3 unacceptably increases the risk of accidents,4 as seen with the BP Deepwater Horizon spill.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Washington Fair Royalty Application
    First 1500 people get into the Northeast Washington Fair August 26 FREE Table of Contents The NE WA Fair Aims and Purpose ............................................................................................3 Admission Prices ............................................................................................................................3 Map of Fairgrounds .......................................................................................................................4 Pre-Fair Schedule ...........................................................................................................................5 Fair Schedule .............................................................................................................................. 5-6 Parking on the Fairgrounds ..........................................................................................................7 General Fair Rules and Regulations ........................................................................................ 8-9 RV Camping Rules and Regulations ..........................................................................................10 Fair Royalty Picture ..................................................................................................................11 Information .................................................................................................... 12-13 Application..................................................................................................... 14-15 Parade Information
    [Show full text]
  • Download Technipusa Information
    JMK:AES F#2019R00879 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INFORMATION - against - Cr. No. 19-279 (KAM) (T. 18, U.S.C., §§ 371 and 3551 et~-) TECHNIP USA INC., Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X THE UNITED STATES CHARGES: At all times relevant to this Information, unless otherwise stated: I. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78dd-l et seq. (the "FCPA"), was enacted by Congress for the purpose of, among other things, making it unlawful to act corruptly in furtherance of an offer, promise, authorization, or payment ofmoney or anything ofvalue, directly or indirectly, to a foreign official for the purpose of assisting in obtaining or retaining business for, or directing business to, any person. II. The Defendant 2. The defendant TECHNIP USA INC. ("Technip USA") was a wholly- owned subsidiary ofTechnip S.A. ("Technip"), a global provider of oil and gas technology and services. Technip USA had its principal place ofbusiness in the United States and was organized under the laws ofthe State ofDelaware. At all relevant times, Technip USA was a "domestic concern," and Technip was a stockholder of a "domestic concern," as that term is used in the FCPA, Title 15, United States Code, Section 78dd-2. III. Relevant Entities and Individuals 3. Technip was an oil and gas technology and services company that was headquartered in France and maintained subsidiary companies and offices in, among other places, Houston, Texas. From in or about and between August 2001 and November 2007, shares of Technip's stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange, and Technip was required to file periodic reports with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Miscellaneous Collections
    Miscellaneous Collections Abbott Dr Property Ownership from OWH morgue files, 1957 Afro-American calendar, 1972 Agricultural Society note pad Agriculture: A Masterly Review of the Wealth, Resources and Possibilities of Nebraska, 1883 Ak-Sar-Ben Banquet Honoring President Theodore Roosevelt, menu and seating chart, 1903 Ak-Sar-Ben Coronation invitations, 1920-1935 Ak-Sar-Ben Coronation Supper invitations, 1985-89 Ak-Sar-Ben Exposition Company President's report, 1929 Ak-Sar-Ben Festival of Alhambra invitation, 1898 Ak-Sar-Ben Horse Racing, promotional material, 1987 Ak-Sar-Ben King and Queen Photo Christmas cards, Ak-Sar-Ben Members Show tickets, 1951 Ak-Sar-Ben Membership cards, 1920-52 Ak-Sar-Ben memo pad, 1962 Ak-Sar-Ben Parking stickers, 1960-1964 Ak-Sar-Ben Racing tickets Ak-Sar-Ben Show posters Al Green's Skyroom menu Alamito Dairy order slips All City Elementary Instrumental Music Concert invitation American Balloon Corps Veterans 43rd Reunion & Homecoming menu, 1974 American Biscuit & Manufacturing Co advertising card American Gramaphone catalogs, 1987-92 American Loan Plan advertising card American News of Books: A Monthly Estimate for Demand of Forthcoming Books, 1948 American Red Cross Citations, 1968-1969 American Red Cross poster, "We Have Helped Have You", 1910 American West: Nebraska (in German), 1874 America's Greatest Hour?, ca. 1944 An Excellent Thanksgiving Proclamation menu, 1899 Angelo's menu Antiquarium Galleries Exhibit Announcements, 1988 Appleby, Agnes & Herman 50 Wedding Anniversary Souvenir pamphlet, 1978 Archbishop
    [Show full text]
  • Newfield Exploration Company 2016 Annual Report
    ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING ADVANCING • EXECUTING • DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING DELIVERING • FOCUSING • OPTIMIZING • ADVANCING • EXECUTING
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of WESTERN OIL SHALE HISTORY of WESTERN OIL SHALE
    / _... i';C4 - SHELF , Historyof Western Oil Shale Paul L. Russell . " The Center for Professional Advancement Paul Russell received his degree from the University of Arizona. After working for Industry for five years, he began his involvement with oil shale in 1948 when he joined the U.S. Bureau of Mines and was assigned to Rifle, Colorado, to work at Anvil Points. During the middle fifties, he was assigned to the Atomic Energy Com­ mission to study the extraction of ura­ nium from the Chattanooga Shales in Tennessee. He became Research Director of the U.S. Bureau ofMines in 1967 and served in this capacity until he retired in 1979. During these years his involvement with oil shale intensified. Currently, he is an engineering consultant. ISBN: 0-86563-000-3 ,._-------_._.. V.D.ALLRED 6016 SOUTH BANNOCK LI7TLETON. COLO. 80120 ....~ ...........~..... This compelling history spans 65 years of western oil shale development from its begin­ ning to the present day. These were the years in which most of the present-day retorting pro­ cesses were invented and devel­ oped,leading to present studies of in-situ retorting, and to the resumption of leasing of fed­ eral oil shale lands. The many excellent illustra­ tions and contemporary photo­ graphs in themselves provide a pictorial record of an era when the United States was "wild over oil"-an era when Gov­ ernment estimates of billions of barrels of oil in western oil shales were used to advan­ tage for questionable-if not fraudulent-stock promotions designed to raise capital for development, or to fatten the promoters' pockets.
    [Show full text]
  • Tables of Statistics
    Tables of statistics Caution The data given in the historic series may sometimes differ from those of the text due to the different statistic source and the different data processing methods used. 224 Oil economics and policies Table 1 - World crude oil prices, 1859-19981 Year Price Change Year Price Change Year Price Change (doll./bbl) doll.lbb1 % (doll.lbbl) doll.lbb1 % (doll.lbb1) doll.lbb1 % 1859 16.00 1909 0.70 0.0 -2.8 1959 1.92 -0.2 -7.7 1860 9.59 --6.4 -40.1 1910 0.61 --{).1 -12.9 1960 1.86 --{).1 ":'3.1 1861 0.49 -9.1 -94.9 1911 0.61 0.0 0.0 1961 1.80 --{).1 -3.2 1862 1.05 0.6 114.3 1912 0.74 0.1 21.3 1962 1.80 0.0 0.0 1863 3.15 2.1 200.0 1913 0.95 0.2 28.4 1963 1.80 0.0 0.0 1864 8.06 4.9 155.9 1914 0.81 --{).1 -14.7 1964 1.80 0.0 0.0 1865 6.59 -1.5 -18.2 1915 0.64 --{).2 -21.0 1965 1.80 0.0 0.0 1866 3.74 -2.9 -43.2 1916 1.10 0.5 71.9 1966 1.80 0.0 0.0 1867 2.41 -1.3 -35.6 1917 1.56 0.5 41.8 1967 1.80 0.0 0.0 1868 3.62 1.2 50.2 1918 1.98 0.4 26.9 1968 1.80 0.0 0.0 1869 5.64 2.0 55.8 1919 2.01 0.0 1.5 1969 1.80 0.0 0.0 1870 3.86 -1.8 -31.6 1920 3.07 1.1 52.7 1970 1.80 0.0 0.0 1871 4.34 0.5 12.4 1921 1.73 -1.3 -43.6 1971 2.13 0.3 18.3 1872 3.64 --{).7 -16.1 1922 1.61 --{).1 -6.9 1972 2.48 0.4 16.4 1873 1.83 -1.8 -49.7 1923 1.34 --{).3 -16.8 1973 2.81 0.3 13.3 1874 1.17 --{).7 -36.1 1924 1.43 0.1 6.7 1974 10.98 8.2 290.7 1875 1.35 0.2 15.4 1925 1.68 0.3 17.5 1975 10.71 --{).3 -2.5 1876 2.52 1.2 86.7 1926 1.88 0.2 11.9 1976 11.63 0.9 8.6 1877 2.38 --{).1 -5.6 1927 1.30 --{).6 -30.9 1977 12.57 0.9 8.1 1878 1.17 -1.2 -50.8 1928 1.17
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Deepwater Oil Drilling Regulation
    January 2011 RFF DP 10-62 Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Deepwater Oil Drilling Regulation Alan Krupnick, Sarah Campbell, Mark A. Cohen, and Ian W.H. Parry 1616 P St. NW Washington, DC 20036 202-328-5000 www.rff.org DISCUSSION PAPER Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Deepwater Oil Drilling Regulation Alan Krupnick, Sarah Campbell, Mark A. Cohen, and Ian W.H. Parry Abstract The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual framework for understanding how analysis of costs and benefits might be incorporated into an assessment of regulatory policies affecting deepwater drilling. We begin by providing a framework for analyzing the life-cycle impacts of oil drilling and its alternatives, including onshore drilling and importing oil from abroad. We then provide background estimates of the different sources of oil supplied in the United States, look at how other oil supply sources might respond to regulations on deepwater drilling, and consider the economic costs of these regulations. After providing a comprehensive description of the potential costs and benefits from various types of drilling—including, when possible, estimates of the magnitude of these benefits and costs—we discuss the extent to which these costs and benefits may already be taken into account (or reinforced) through the legal, regulatory, and tax systems and through market mechanisms. We conclude by presenting a framework and simple example of how a cost–benefit analysis might be used to inform regulation of deepwater drilling, and sum up the policy implications of our work. Key Words: catastrophic oil spill, cost–benefit analysis, government regulation, liability © 2011 Resources for the Future.
    [Show full text]
  • NP 2013.Docx
    LISTE INTERNATIONALE DES NOMS PROTÉGÉS (également disponible sur notre Site Internet : www.IFHAonline.org) INTERNATIONAL LIST OF PROTECTED NAMES (also available on our Web site : www.IFHAonline.org) Fédération Internationale des Autorités Hippiques de Courses au Galop International Federation of Horseracing Authorities 15/04/13 46 place Abel Gance, 92100 Boulogne, France Tel : + 33 1 49 10 20 15 ; Fax : + 33 1 47 61 93 32 E-mail : [email protected] Internet : www.IFHAonline.org La liste des Noms Protégés comprend les noms : The list of Protected Names includes the names of : F Avant 1996, des chevaux qui ont une renommée F Prior 1996, the horses who are internationally internationale, soit comme principaux renowned, either as main stallions and reproducteurs ou comme champions en courses broodmares or as champions in racing (flat or (en plat et en obstacles), jump) F de 1996 à 2004, des gagnants des neuf grandes F from 1996 to 2004, the winners of the nine épreuves internationales suivantes : following international races : Gran Premio Carlos Pellegrini, Grande Premio Brazil (Amérique du Sud/South America) Japan Cup, Melbourne Cup (Asie/Asia) Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Stakes, Queen Elizabeth II Stakes (Europe/Europa) Breeders’ Cup Classic, Breeders’ Cup Turf (Amérique du Nord/North America) F à partir de 2005, des gagnants des onze grandes F since 2005, the winners of the eleven famous épreuves internationales suivantes : following international races : Gran Premio Carlos Pellegrini, Grande Premio Brazil (Amérique du Sud/South America) Cox Plate (2005), Melbourne Cup (à partir de 2006 / from 2006 onwards), Dubai World Cup, Hong Kong Cup, Japan Cup (Asie/Asia) Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Stakes, Irish Champion (Europe/Europa) Breeders’ Cup Classic, Breeders’ Cup Turf (Amérique du Nord/North America) F des principaux reproducteurs, inscrits à la F the main stallions and broodmares, registered demande du Comité International des Stud on request of the International Stud Book Books.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Production for OCS Operators
    Gas Production for OCS Operators in CY 2006 - Ranked by Volume (The volumes here are subject to change as additional production reports are processed) Gulf of Mexico OCS Pacific OCS Alaska OCS TOTAL OCS Natural Gas Casinghead Natural Casinghead Natural Casinghead OPERATOR Rank Gas Gas Gas Gas Gas (mcf) (mcf) (mcf) (mcf) (mcf) (mcf) (mcf) 1 Shell Offshore Inc. 188,505,018 181,319,506 369,824,524 2 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 177,525,875 57,755,858 235,281,733 3 Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corporation 148,907,524 70,205,226 219,112,750 4 Apache Corporation 161,837,488 22,739,613 184,577,101 5 Exxon Mobil Corporation 125,637,461 17,857,017 0 33,189,450 0 0 176,683,928 6 BP Exploration & Production Inc. 81,806,055 89,027,613 170,833,668 7 Newfield Exploration Company 95,305,826 2,568,322 97,874,148 8 Dominion Exploration & Production, Inc 81,514,387 13,323,833 94,838,220 9 Union Oil Company of California 63,186,059 1,494,725 64,680,784 10 Energy Partners, Ltd. 50,159,807 1,291,120 51,450,927 Subtotal 1,174,385,500 457,582,833 0 33,189,450 0 0 1,665,157,783 11 Walter Oil & Gas Corporation 45,242,496 3,115,388 48,357,884 12 Noble Energy, Inc. 35,591,474 12,134,601 47,726,075 13 W & T Offshore, Inc. 41,937,859 4,261,894 46,199,753 14 LLOG Exploration Offshore, Inc.
    [Show full text]