DOCSLIB.ORG

Informational Display Boards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Anoka Solution 2022-2023 Construction The U.S. Highway 10/169 Project will reduce crashes and improve traffic operations. This will result in improved mobility and reliability for all users of the project corridor. ANOKA SOLUTION • 60,600 vehicles per day The City of Anoka continues to work closely • Principal Arterial moves regional freight; 3,300 heavy 1+ mile daily backups with MnDOT, Metropolitan Council, Anoka commercial vehicles from Fairoak Avenue County, and other partners to plan, design, • 1+ mile back-ups during peak hour and implement fiscally-responsible safety • 21 mph avg. peak hour speed (60 mph posted) Issues and operation improvements to benefit all Existing • 1,128 crashes (2 fatal) from 2006-2015 • Crash Rate 1.5x state average U.S. Highway 10/169 corridor users. • Segmented local network forces local highway trips e v Evening Backups n A o 0.43 miles r t e s v r i R u h m • 75% delay reduction T ?ÒA@ u • 57% crash reduction #:Qh R • 4.0 benefit-cost ratio )y BNSF Railway M i s )m • Accomodate 90,000 vehicles/day s i s s i p #:Qh • Local trips on local network p e 1.15 miles Results i A v R k Main St i a • Safe and reliable movement of goods v o Investment e r r i a F and services W Total Investment THURSTON AVE. All funding is GREENHAVEN RD. GREENHAVEN committed! COUNTRY CLUB GREEN HAVEN PKWY. 80M $ TH 10/ TH 169 GREEN HAVEN PKWY. CALVARY CEMETERY ANOKA TECHNICAL COLLEGE OAKWOOD CEMETERY . D R E IC V R WEST MAIN ST SERVICE RD. SE VISTA WAY 0 1 OAK ST. WEST HIGHWAY MAIN ST. TH 10/TH 169 WEST MAIN ST. GREEN AVE. TH 10/ TH 169 REED AVE. FAIROAK AVE. W CHURCH ST. MAIN ST. FOREST HILL CEMETERY JOHN WARD PARK C U FOREST AVE. T T E R S G KINGS ISLAND R O V E AV EAGLE BROOK AnokaHwy10.com E CAMPUS CHURCH - ANOKA U.S. Highway 10/169 Improvement Project Overview of Project Improvements LU ND MI BL NERAL D POND VD W C E V T DUNHAM DR Thurston Avenue/Cutters S L T B M D Key Outcomes I Pedestrian and Bicycle BURG N N RUM RIVER DR E O ELECTRONIC Grove Avenue Intersection R P A L RECOVERY L A P Q R O Connections U E RIVERDALE A N DR N NW R D I R B M Y L T A V S THURSTON AVE • Remove existing traffic signal and replace V D A E E MC CA • Eliminate delay and queuing NN • Provide new grade-separated crossings with grade-separated roundabout AVE of Highway 10/169TUNGSTEN ST NW at Thurston Avenue BNSF RAILWAY LANO DIAMOND AUTO interchange associated with existing EQUIPMENT and Fairoak Avenue with dedicated non- ANOKA SIGNS BY RSG RIVLYN AVE NW TECHNICAL North Side – Local Road COLLEGE MCKINLEY CIR motorized accommodations • Thurston Avenue interchange will be PLACERAVE MCK Circulation & Connection traffic signals depressed 4 feet and Highway 10/169 will be INLEY ST • Include dedicated non-motorized elevated 17 feet above existing elevation RAINIERAVE accommodations to all new and/or improved STEP • Green Haven Parkway service road local connections • Innovative roundabout-style interchange improvements 10 ST • Substantial crash reduction design, with highway bridged over Thurston LOGAN • New roadway west of Thurston Avenue SAINTFRANCIS BLVD * * ** * 169 * * Avenue G SERVICE RD providingAVE SHASTA access to Anoka Technical College R E CREATIVE KIDS E ACADEMYREGENCY N Highway Access • Multi-useHA trail provided on the west side of and setting up potential future extension as INN & SUITES BNSF Railway KENNEDY ST T V E H N 1ST NATIONAL P U a frontage road into Ramsey Management ThurstonK Avenue V BANK OF • Enhanced functional, I R W S ELK RIVER Y TA S W T AY O N VISTA • Only access points to Highway 10/169 will be * * OUTDOORS A operational, and safety * * G V * * R at Main Street/Greenhaven Road interchange E * E * E Fairoak Avenue * * * N and Thurston Avenue interchange * H * * A characteristics for local * V Intersection * EN * PK * * W * Y XKIMOST connecting roadways due * • Remove existing traffic signal and replace ZUNI ST * W GARFIELD ST * * * * * with an underpass (highway bridged over * * * * * * City of Anoka * * to extensions, roundabouts, * Fairoak Avenue) * * * * * * CALVARY * * * KWIK TRIP * CEMETERY * * * GREENHAVEN RD * * VALVOLINE * • Fairoak Avenue underpass will be depressed * * geometric improvements, INSTANT OIL * JEROME ST FERRY ST CHANGE * 4 feet and Highway 10/169 will be elevated Main Street/Greenhaven * 15 feet above existing elevation Road Interchange and other measures CUTTERS GROVE AVE FIRST MN BANK CUTTERS GROVE EUCLIDAVE APARTMENT LIBERTY ACTION'S VERNDALEAVE HOMES TITLE FISHING • Multi-use trail with boulevard provided on MASTERERSON • Replace existing Highway 10/169 bridge AMERICAN BRIGHTON ST STAFFING FRASER SOLUTIONS FAMILY west side of Fairoak Avenue, sidewalk with INSURANCE over Main Street/Greenhaven Road BETTER VALUE boulevard provided on east side S LIQUOR T • Greatly improved non- D A V T • Improve existing non-motorized L GREEN HAVEN E B COUNTRY CLUB A V E E EAGLE N CUTTERS LN O OAK ST accommodations along Main Street/ BROOK T CHURCH S CHURCH OFWHISPERING motorized connectivity, W * O LATTERPINE ASSISTED L * AVE FAIROAK Greenhaven Road CUTTERS GROVE AVE L DAY SAINTS LIVING E BAMBOO Y * WEST MAIN ST VILLAGE HONEST-1 * AUTO CARE SITE FOR SALE CULVER'S * * • Construct a new roundabout at the access, and safety SERVICE RD South Side – Local Road * Mississippi River * KFC GREEN HAVEN PKWY CUTTERS GROVE CIR SUPER AMERICA * PAWN westbound ramp terminal for improved * MARTIN ST Circulation & Connection AMERICA JJ AUTO SERVICE operations and safety RAINBOW PLAZA McDONALD'S LOM'S * * APARTMENTS TAX INSURANCE ANOKA FLATS WINGFIELDAVE GRACELIFE CHURCH * SOLUTIONS APARTMENTS TACO BELL HEALTH P * GREENHAVEN IN PARTNERS • W. Main Street extension will provideWOODLAND a OFFICE SUITES R E * • Construct a new roundabout at the GREENHAVEN SUBURBAN GREENHAVEN RD I R PARK * V * I * MEDICAL EQUIP E MARKETING D APARTMENTS COMBAT BRANCH AVE BRANCH R * * G CORP WRIGHT TIRE S continuous roadwayE from Main Street to * SPORTS eastbound ramp terminal for improved B D * L R U * PERKINS F Thurston Avenue;F Cutters Grove Avenue will * PLEASANT ST L operations and safety, and to accommodate N THE HAVEN * TO WB HIG D H * R W ON FAIROAK A W “T” into the service road and will be the N Y B * E 1 Main Street extension to the west V H 0 A IG H H W N A controlled stop E Y E 1 FAIROAK AVE 0 R TO G G RE EN HA Legend • Addition of sidewalk with boulevard on VE ! N RD I AY 10 HIGHW TO WB W. Main Street FERRY ST Concrete Barrier Railroad CHURCH ST 10 169 E B HIGH * * WAY 10 TO Bridge Retaining Walls FER SIGN RY S THE TIRE ZOO STATION INC. T Concrete Stormwater Ponds Y PINEWSKI'S O H BOARD SHOPS O D GRAY ST Landscaping R E V E TIENDA EL A V RINCONCITO MEXICANO T A BENTON ST S THE ECIG SHOP D Pavement E E R E SWEDISH O CELLECTRONIX R F CROWN BAKERY MAIN ST CLAY ST Shoulder JELLYBEAN ANOKA E PARK ST SHOPPING V AND JULIA'S WEST MAIN ST A CENTER R Sidewalk/Trail E T W R E O S P T E R AVE GREEN 0 300 D N Feet FAIROAK CT OU ST G L CUTTER ST A S CALHO Source: Anoka County, MnDOT, Nearmap Imagery C T UN ST AnokaHwy10.com U.S. Highway 10/169 Improvement Project Anoka HWY 10/169 Improvement Project Figure 2-2 Existing Traffic Conditions Vehicle Traffic Environmental Assessment August 2019 Issues GÃWX GöWX Between 2006 and 2015, over Increasing traffic demands 12,700 325 people were injured and 2 people died in crashes on this Highway 10/169 freeway ends at 16,600 segment of highway. Two other ve fatalities occurred in 2003. Fairoak Avenue; traffic volumes A n #:Qh to s PM Peak Hour Max not adequately served by traffic )m r u )y 54,400 h % Queue Length: signals at Fairoak Avenue and T 72,100 0.43 miles Thurston Avenue ^_^_ ^_ 10,200 Lack of local roadway connections 2011-2015 16,200 forces local trips onto highway BNSF Railway Crash Rate 2.15 ?ÒA@ Times Higher than R E % V Statewide Average* I #:Qh R Anoka M M 5,100 89,700 U I S R S I F S 3,100 PM Peak Hour Max 6,500 S e I r P r Queue Length: P ^_ VerndaleAve 2011-2015 y Outcomes I S R 5,100 1.15 miles ^_ t I Crash Rate 5.37 N V ^_ E R ^_^_ % Times Higher than • Excessive delay and queuing along 2,800 #:Qh Statewide Average* project corridor ^_ 60,600 20,700 e v A Legend k % ! a I 24,700 • High crash rates, particularly at o Fai r PM Peak Hour Queues (2017) 70,400 56,400 ^_ Private Driveway M 85,600 74,000 Fairoak Avenue and Thurston a Average in S ^_ Public Access t Avenue intersections W Maximum City Boundaries 26,700 30,000 X,XXX Existing (2017) AADT * For Comparable Intersection Type 17,700 X,XXX Future (2041) AADT 0 ¼ 32,000 Source: Anoka County, MnDOT, MnGeo, Nearmap Imagery Miles AADT = Annual Average Daily Traffic Map Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\ANOK\T44119364\ESRI\Maps\OpenHouse\119364_ExistingConditionsTraffic_8x11L.mxd | AM Date Saved:8:47:55 | 9/17/2019 Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\ANOK\T44119364\ESRI\Maps\OpenHouse\119364_ExistingConditionsTraffic_8x11L.mxd Map AnokaHwy10.com U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Final Section 4(F) Evaluation February 23, 2006

    Final Section 4(F) Evaluation February 23, 2006

    NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR RAIL PROJECT Findings of Fact and Conclusions/ Final Section 4(f) Evaluation February 23, 2006 Minnesota Department of Transportation in cooperation with the Northstar Corridor Development Authority the Metropolitan Council and the Federal Transit Administration Northstar Project Office 155 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 755 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 215-8200 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF ISSUE...........................................................................................................................1 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................1 1.0 ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND........................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................................3 3.0 CHANGES IN THE PROJECT SINCE THE EA/DRAFT 4(F) WAS RELEASED ...............4 4.0 ADDITIONS/CORRECTIONS TO THE EA/DRAFT 4(f) EVALUATION............................5 4.1 Alternative Definition…………………………………………………………………………...5 4.2 Farmlands Section........................................................................................................................5 4.3 Wetland Mitigation Plan..............................................................................................................5 5.0 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS RECEIVED ..............................................................................7 5.1 Agency Comments.......................................................................................................................7
  • 2017 Annual Regional Park-And-Ride System Report

    2017 Annual Regional Park-And-Ride System Report

    2017 ANNUAL REGIONAL PARK-AND-RIDE SYSTEM REPORT JANUARY 2018 Prepared for: Metropolitan Council Metro Transit Minnesota Valley Transit Authority SouthWest Transit Maple Grove Transit Plymouth Metrolink Northstar Link Minnesota Department of Transportation Wisconsin Department of Transportation Prepared by: Soobin Choi Metro Transit Engineering and Facilities, Planning and Urban Design 2016 Annual Regional Park-and-Ride System Report | 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................................3 Overview ......................................................................................................................................................6 Regional System Profile ...............................................................................................................................7 Capacity Changes........................................................................................................................................8 System Capacity and Usage by Travel Corridor .......................................................................................10 System Capacity and Usage by Transitway ..............................................................................................13 Facilities with Significant Utilization Changes ..........................................................................................15 Utlilization Increase in Large Facilities .................................................................................................15
  • Annual Report to the Legislature 2015 Results

    Annual Report to the Legislature 2015 Results

    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Annual Report to the Legislature 2015 Results Submitted: February 1, 2016 1 Annual Report to the Legislature: 2015 Results Submitted February 1, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Letter From Board Chair ...................................................................................................................................3 2.0 Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................5 3.0 Authority: Legislation and Joint Powers Agreement ......................................................................................11 4.0 Organizational Structure: Board and Committees .........................................................................................12 5.0 Transit investment Framework: Vision and Policies.......................................................................................15 6.0 Program of Projects Investment Strategy ......................................................................................................19 7.0 Funding Commitments ...................................................................................................................................25 8.0 Transit Sales Tax Revenues Received .............................................................................................................29
  • Northstar Corridor Rail Project

    Northstar Corridor Rail Project

    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR RAIL PROJECT Findings of Fact and Conclusions/ Final Section 4(f) Evaluation February 23, 2006 Minnesota Department of Transportation in cooperation with the Northstar Corridor Development Authority the Metropolitan Council and the Federal Transit Administration Northstar Project Office 155 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 755 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 215-8200 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF ISSUE...........................................................................................................................1 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................1 1.0 ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND........................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................................3 3.0 CHANGES IN THE PROJECT SINCE THE EA/DRAFT 4(F) WAS RELEASED ...............4 4.0 ADDITIONS/CORRECTIONS TO THE EA/DRAFT 4(f) EVALUATION............................5 4.1 Alternative Definition…………………………………………………………………………...5 4.2 Farmlands Section........................................................................................................................5 4.3 Wetland Mitigation Plan..............................................................................................................5
  • Regional Transitway Guidelines Technical Report May 2011 1

    Regional Transitway Guidelines Technical Report May 2011 1

    Transitway Guidelines Technical Report Regional Transitway Guidelines May 2011 Chapter 1: Introduction Regional Transitway Guidelines Technical Report May 2011 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. PURPOSE OF GUIDELINES The purpose of the Regional Transitway Guidelines is to provide technical guidance, based in best practices, that supports the development and operation of transitways in a way that is consistent, equitable, and efficient, and delivers an effective, integrated, and user-friendly transit system throughout the Twin Cities region. Existing practices have been documented; best practices have been researched; and recommendations on guidelines for future transitway planning and implementation have been developed on many issues. The guidelines will continue to evolve over time as the region’s experience with transitway implementation grows and as new technologies and best practices emerge. Regional transitway guidelines are needed for three primary reasons: • The region’s progressively growing transitway system. The region’s transitway system is growing quickly and the region has learned a great deal from the implementation of the first commuter rail and light rail lines. Those lessons will help to guide the implementation of future transitways. This is important for leveraging future investments, for proceeding efficiently through planning and design (not reinventing the wheel each time), and for achieving the regional goal of doubling transit ridership by 2030. • Multiple agencies involved in transitway implementation. There are multiple agencies involved in the planning and implementation of transitways in the Twin Cities region. Local governments, particularly counties and regional railroad authorities, play a lead role in the planning of transitway corridors and recommending locally preferred alternatives. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), Metropolitan Council and Metro Transit, Counties Transit Improvement Board (CTIB), counties, and cities are involved in the funding, design, and construction of transitway facilities and services.
  • Title Vi Program in Compliance with Fta Circular 4702.1B

    Title Vi Program in Compliance with Fta Circular 4702.1B

    TITLE VI PROGRAM IN COMPLIANCE WITH FTA CIRCULAR 4702.1B January 2020 The Council’s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region. Metropolitan Council Members Charlie Zelle Chair Raymond Zeran District 9 Judy Johnson District 1 Peter Lindstrom District 10 Reva Chamblis District 2 Susan Vento District 11 Christopher Ferguson District 3 Francisco J. Gonzalez District 12 Deb Barber District 4 Chai Lee District 13 Molly Cummings District 5 Kris Fredson District 14 Lynnea Atlas-Ingebretson District 6 Phillip Sterner District 15 Robert Lilligren District 7 Wendy Wulff District 16 Abdirahman Muse District 8 The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning organization for the seven-county Twin Cities area. The Council operates the regional bus and rail system, collects and treats wastewater, coordinates regional water resources, plans and helps fund regional parks, and administers federal funds that provide housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income individuals and families. The 17-member Council board is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the governor. This publication printed on recycled paper. On request, this publication will be made available in alternative formats to people with disabilities. Call Metropolitan Council information at 651-602-1140 or TTY 651-291-0904. Page - 2 Metropolitan Council Title VI Program Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Metropolitan
  • Ramsey Station Tod Market Analysis

    Ramsey Station Tod Market Analysis

    RAMSEY STATION TOD MARKET ANALYSIS Prepared for: City of Ramsey Northstar Corridor Development Authority Prepared by: McComb Group, Ltd. Vantage Point Development Advisors Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. May 2013 RAMSEY STATION TOD MARKET ANALYSIS Prepared for: City of Ramsey Northstar Corridor Development Authority Prepared by: McComb Group, Ltd. Vantage Point Development Advisors Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. May 2013 [Back of inside coversheet] “The work that provided the basis for this publication was supported by funding under an award with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The substance and findings of the work are dedicated to the public. The author and publisher are solely responsible for the accuracy of the statements and interpretations contained in this publication. Such interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the Government." TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Subject Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................ vii Northstar Commuter Rail ...................................................................................... vii Commuter Rail ....................................................................................................... ix Commuter Rail Transit-Oriented Development ..................................................... ix Ramsey Development Potential ...............................................................................x Residential Development ................................................................................
  • 888 Northstar Line

    888 Northstar Line

    Northstar Line Page 1 of 2 888 metrotransit.org | 612-373-3333 Effective 12/1/18 Northstar Commuter Rail Line Big Lake Park & Ride Station 887 169 1 ELK RIVER 00 Connecting bus routes 1 Timepoint 10 M SISSIPPI RIV IS ER Elk River 2 Station RAMSEY Ramsey 101 Station 94 3 Anoka Station 4 805 ANOKA ROGERS Coon Rapids – 5 Riverdale Station M IS S I S 850 860 S IP P I R I VE 169 R COON RAPIDS 10 MAPLE BROOKLYN FRIDLEY GROVE PARK Fridley 6 Station 852 94 694 494 94 2nd St Target Field Washington Station 7 DOWNTOWN 394 MINNEAPOLIS Downtown Minneapolis 5th St 5th Ave 6th Ave 35W 3rd Ave N Target 2nd Ave N 7th St Washington Ave Blue/Green Field Platform 2 Station Northstar Platform Blue/Green 2nd Ave N Escalators/elevators Platform 1 to Northstar Line platform below 3rd St 1st Ave N TARGET FIELD 4th St 7th St Ramp B/5th St Transit Center Routes: 3, 14, 94, 355, 365, 375 Warehouse/ Hennepin Ave Station Rod Carew TARGET CENTER Twins Way 1st Ave N Hennepin Ave Nicollet Mall Station 6th St Northstar Line Page 2 of 2 888 metrotransit.org | 612-373-3333 Park & Ride Locations Special event service may be provided for some downtown events, including Twins and Vikings games. For dates and Park free at these lots while you schedules, visit metrotransit.org/Northstar. commute. No overnight parking. ANOKA Northstar trains do not operate on • Anoka Station: 2718 4th Ave these holidays: New Year’s Day, Easter, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor BIG LAKE Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas.
  • Northstar Corridor TOD Trends Northstar Corridor the Northstar Commuter Rail Line Opened in 2009

    Northstar Corridor TOD Trends Northstar Corridor the Northstar Commuter Rail Line Opened in 2009

    Northstar Corridor TOD Trends Northstar Corridor The Northstar Commuter Rail Line opened in 2009. Operating along a 40-mile corridor from Big Lake to downtown Minneapolis, Northstar passes through historic river towns, suburban communities and urban neighborhoods. By providing these communities with a convenient commuting option to Target Field Station in downtown Minneapolis, the Northstar has generated interest in Transit Oriented Development (TOD). This report will look at the TOD trends occurring in the six Northstar station areas outside of downtown Minneapolis. Notes: All development values are for 1/2 mile station area. All development value data is from the Metropolitan Council’s Annual Building Permit Survey. Values are not available for Elk River or Big Lake as they are outside of the seven-county metro area. Commercial and public/ institutional development data is from 2003-2017. Residential development data includes only multifamily residential development and is from 2009-2017. Contents Fridley ...............................................................................................................3 Coon Rapids/Riverdale ...............................................................................5 Anoka ...............................................................................................................7 Ramsey .............................................................................................................9 Elk River .........................................................................................................11