Researching the Law of Motion Pictures: a Revised and Comprehensive Bibliography of Law-Related Materials Frank G

Home , Film colorization, Frank Pierson, Roger Mayer (executive), We Need the Eggs

Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal

Volume 14 | Number 1 Article 6

1-1-1991 Researching the Law of Motion Pictures: A Revised and Comprehensive Bibliography of Law-Related Materials Frank G. Houdek

Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_comm_ent_law_journal Part of the Communications Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons

Recommended Citation Frank G. Houdek, Researching the Law of Motion Pictures: A Revised and Comprehensive Bibliography of Law-Related Materials, 14 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 137 (1991). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol14/iss1/6

This Special Feature is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Researching the Law of Motion Pictures: A Revised and Comprehensive Bibliography of Law-Related Materials*

by FRANK G. HOUDEK**

Table of Contents I. B ooks ...... 139 A . In G eneral ...... 139 B . A ntitrust ...... 140 C. Business Aspects of Motion Pictures ...... 140 D. Censorship and Self-Regulation ...... 143 E. Copyright and Related Issues ...... 146 F. Foreign Film-Making ...... 147 G . Taxation ...... 148 II. Periodicals ...... 149 III. Legal Institute Program Materials ...... 150 A. Practising Law Institute ...... 150 B. UCLA Entertainment Symposium ...... 151 C. University of Southern California Law Center Entertainment Law Institute ...... 152

This bibliography combines and revises two earlier works previously published in Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal (CoMM/ENT): Houdek & Gunderson, Theatrical Motion Pictures and the Law: A Comprehensive Bibliography of Law- Related Materials,3 COMM/ENT L.J. 117 (1980) and Houdek, Theatrical Motion Pictures and the Law: A Comprehensive Bibliography of Law-Related Materials,Supplement (1980-1984), 6 CoMM/ENT L.J. 951 (1984). The present work incorporates the organization used in the previous bibliographies while adding several new topics in the "Legal Periodical Articles" section to reflect the areas which have developed in this field since 1984 (e.g., Colorization, CharacterRights, Title Rights, and Docudramas). Materials published through July 1991 are included. ** Law Library Director and Professor of Law, Southern Illinois University School of Law. B.A., 1971, J.D. (Order of the Coil), 1974, M.L.S., 1976, University of California at Los Angeles. The author gratefully acknowledges the patience and skill of Pamela Graham for her invaluable assistance in the construction and maintenance of the data base used to compile the bibliography and in the preparation of the manuscript. The author also wishes to thank his research assistant, Jeffrey Dash, for his assistance in this project. HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137 HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137 IV. U.S. Government Publications ...... 154 A. Censorship, Ratings, and Regulation ...... 154 B. Economic Conditions and Labor ...... 156 C . Taxation ...... 158 D. "Un-American" Activities and Blacklisting ...... 158 E. Video Recording and Piracy ...... 160 F. Protecting the Artistic Rights of Filmmakers ...... 162 G . M iscellaneous ...... 165 V. Annotated Law Reports Annotations ...... 166 VI. Legal Periodical Articles ...... 167 A . A ntitrust ...... 167 B. Business Aspects of Motion Pictures ...... 170 1. Financing and Production ...... 170 2. D istribution ...... 173 3. Labor and Employment Issues ...... 175 C. Censorship and Regulation of Motion Picture Content. 177 1. In General ...... 177 2. Self-Censorship and Rating Systems ...... 179 3. Violence in Motion Pictures ...... 179 4. Adult Motion Picture Theaters ...... 179 5. Propaganda and Political Censorship ...... 180 D. Copyright and Related Issues ...... 181 1. Copyright ...... 181 2. Character Rights ...... 186 3. Title Rights ...... 187 E. Protecting the Artistic and Personal Rights of Filmmakers (See also "Colorization", "Right of Publicity", and "Screenwriters") ...... 188 1. In General ...... 188 2. Screen Credit ...... , ...... 189 3. M anagem ent ...... 189 4. Compensation/Personal Tax Issues ...... 189 F. Colorization ...... 190 G . Screenwriters ...... 193 H. Right of Publicity (See also "Docudramas") ...... 193 I. D ocudram as ...... 195 J. Music and Motion Pictures ...... 196 K . Taxation ...... 197 L. Foreign and International Aspects of Filmmaking ..... 200 M. Video Recording and Piracy ...... 202 N . M iscellaneous ...... 203 19911 BIBLIOGRAPHY

I Books A. In General

Entertainment, Publishing and the Arts Handbook New York, NY: Clark Boardman Co., 1983-. 1 v. Annual compilation of articles (some original, some reprinted) recap- ping the latest developments in the legal field of entertainment, publishing and the arts. Designed to assist practitioners by providing practical articles prepared by experts in the field. Includes sections on topics such as copyright, music, motion pictures, employment, and taxes.

Frohlich, Louis D. and Charles Schwartz. The Law of Motion Pictures. New York, NY: Baker, Voorhis, 1918. 943 pp. Based on an exhaustive review of every available state and federal court decision at the time, as well as decisions from England and Can- ada, this treatise reviews the rights of authors, actors, screenwriters, directors, producers, distributors and exhibitors as they relate to the law of motion pictures. Separate chapters cover unfair competition and copyright.

Muller, Peter. Show Business Law: Motion Pictures, Television, Video. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 1991. 262 pp. INCLUDES: 1. The Acquisition of Motion Picture Rights by Op- tion; 2. The Personal Manager Agreement; 3. The Agent Agreement; 4. The Actor Agreement; 5. The Screen Writer Agreement; 6. The Producer Agreement; 7. The Director Agreement; 8. Master Re- cording Use for a Motion Picture and Synchronization Rights; 9. The Motion Picture Distribution Agreement: The Worldwide Pic-Up Deal; 11. Licensing Feature Films for Television Syndication; 12. In- ternational Coproductions; 15. Independent Production Financing.

Rudell, Michael I. Behind the Scenes: Practical Entertainment Law. New York, NY: Law & Business, Inc./Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1984. 270 pp. INCLUDES: 2. Names, Credits and Titles; 3. Copyright Protection; 4. Representation-Managers, Agents, and Attorneys; 8. New Technologies.

Selz, Thomas D. and Melvin Simensky. EntertainmentLaw. Colorado Springs, CO: Shepard's/McGraw-Hill, 1983. 4 v. INCLUDES: 1. Industry Structure; 2. Huge Investments/High Risks; 5. Anticompetitive Practices; 7. Practical Limits on Power of Distributors; 9. The Value and Uses of Billing; 11. Credit Vehicles: Where and How; 12. Multiple Contributor Credits; 18. Right of Pri- vacy; 19. Right of Publicity. Volume 3 contains sample entertainment industry forms, including model agreements for literary HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

purchases; screenplay employment; screenplay loanout; producer/director relationship; producer's/director's loanout; performer's agreement, actor's agreement; composer's agreement.

B. Antitrust

Cassady, Ralph, Jr. Monopoly in Motion PictureProduction and Distribu- tion: 1908-1915. Los Angeles, CA: Bureau of Business and Eco- nomic Research, University of California, 1959. 66 pp.

Cassady, Ralph, Jr. and Ralph Cassady III. The PrivateAntitrust Suit in American Business Competition: A Motion Picture Industry Case Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Bureau of Business and Economic Re- search, University of California, 1964. 66 pp.

Conant, Michael. Antitrust in the Motion Picture Industry. New York, NY: Arno Press, 1978. 240 pp. CONTENTS: I. The Product and Its Demand; II. A History of Inno- vations and Combinations; III. Industrial Structure at the Time of Prosecution; IV. Pricing and Trade Practices; V. The Paramount Case and Its Legal Background; VI. Impact of the Paramount De- crees; VII. Exhibition Control in Chicago: The Jackson Park Case; VIII. Private Antitrust Actions in the Motion Picture Industry; IX. Critical Comment and Conclusions.

Huettig, Mae D. Economic Control of the Motion Picture Industry: A Study in Industrial Organization. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1944. 163 pp.

Taubman, Joseph. Copyright and Antitrust. New York, NY: Federal Legal Publications, 1960. 217 pp.

C. Business Aspects of Motion Pictures

The American Movie Industry: The Business of Motion Pictures. Carbon- dale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982. 474 pp.

Baumgarten, Paul A. and Donald C. Farber. Music In Films, Legal and Business Problems of the Record Industry. 1978.

Baumgarten, Paul A. and Donald C. Farber. Producing,Financing, and DistributingFilm. New York, NY: Drama Book Specialists, 1972. 198 pp. INCLUDES: Acquisition of literary property, screenplay agreements, production-distribution agreements, forms of financing, pro- 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

duction agreements with talent, director's agreement, studio facility agreement, distribution and exhibition agreement.

Bernstein, Irving. Hollywood at the Crossroads: An Economic Study of the Motion Picture Industry. Hollywood, CA: Hollywood AFL Film Council, 1957. 78 pp.

Biederman, Donald E., Robert C. Berry, Edward P. Pierson, Martin E. Silfen, and Jeanne A. Glasser. Law and Business of the Entertain- ment Industries. Dedham, MA: Auburn House, 1987. 713 pp. Comprehensive coverage of cases and related materials arranged by specific entertainment industry. Presents information relevant to all aspects of complex contract negotiations.

Bluem, A. William and Jason E. Squire. The Movie Business: American Film Industry Practice. New York, NY: Hastings House, 1972. 386 pp. INCLUDES: Pertinent excerpts from contracts of major guilds and craft unions.

Breglio, John F. Negotiating Contracts in the Entertainment Industry. New York, NY: Law Journal Seminars-Press, 1986.

Delson, Donn. The Dictionary of Marketing and Related Terms in the Motion Picture Industry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Bradson Press, 1979. 70 pp.

Farber, Donald C., editor. Entertainment Industry Contracts. York, NY. Matthew Bender & Co., 1986. 4'v. An extensive form book set with added commentary, providing gui- dance on negotiating and drafting contracts in the five major areas of the entertainment industry: motion pictures, music, television, book publishing, and theatre. Forms are accompanied by instructions on completing specific clauses and advice on negotiating. Table of contract clauses provides easy access to the forms.

Hurst, Walter E. and Win. Storm Hale. Motion Picture Distribution (Business and/or Racket???). Hollywood, CA: Seven Arts Press, Inc., 1975. 158 pp.

Lindey, Alexander. Lindey on Entertainment, Publishingand the Arts: Agreements and the Law. New York, NY: Clark Boardman, 1980-. looseleaf. VOLUME 2: Motion Pictures, Television and Radio, Sound Record- ings, Artwork, Photographs, Advertising and Publicity, and Com- mercial Exploitation. HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Lindey, Alexander. Motion PictureAgreements Annotated. Albany, NY: Matthew Bender, 1947. 1039 pp. A manual of contract forms covering every phase of the motion picture industry from the purchase of screen rights in book, plays and other material, through financing and production, to distribution and exhibition, with collateral forms dealing with the sale and leasing of motion picture equipment, the leasing of theaters, etc.

Lovell, Hugh and Carter Tasile. Collective Bargainingin the Motion Pic- ture Industry: A Struggle for Stability. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California, 1955. 54 pp.

Mayer, Michael F. The Film Industries; Practical Business/Legal Problems in Production, Distribution and Exhibition. New York, NY: Hastings House, 1973. 212 pp. CONTENTS: I. Production: The Option Contract, Contracting with the Talent, Problems in Financing Feature Films, Production Subsi- dies, the Elements of Popularity; II. Problems in Distribution-Exhibi- tion: The Distribution Agreement, the Exhibition License, Foreign Films-Yesterday and Today, Distribution Abroad, Non Theatrical Markets 1: Schools Clubs, Universities and Related Areas, Non The- atrical Markets 2: TV and the New Media, Print Piracy, The Impact of the Antitrust Laws, Films and Conglomerates, Publicity and Ad- vertising; III. Problems of Content: Control of Film Content, Trouble About Titles, Film and Defamation, Film and Piracy, Com- pensation for Ideas, Characters and Sequels, Copyright Law, Music and Film; IV. Conclusion: To Sum it Up.

McQuillan, Peter. Investing in Canadian Films: Evaluating the Risks and Rewards. Don Mills, Can: CCH Canadian Ltd., 1981. 88 pp.

Orenstein, Harold and David E. Guinn. Entertainment Law and Busi- ness: A Guide to the Law and Business Practices of the Entertain- ment Industry. Stoneham, MA: Butterworths, 1989. 545 pp. Addresses practical problems and solutions common to the developing law governing the creation, development, transfer, and exploitation of various artistic properties. Highlights specific business aspects of entertainment, discussing issues and problems relating to contracts and negotiations. Includes a partial listing of key organizations, guilds, and unions.

Producingfor Motion Picturesand Television: A PracticalGuide to Legal Issues. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles County Bar Association, 1983. 407 pp.

Squire, Jason E., editor. The Movie Business Book Old Tappan, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1983. 414 pp. 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Sterling, Christopher H. The Mass Media. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers, 1978. 457 pp. INCLUDES: 1. Growth of the Media Industries: Motion Picture Production and Distribution, Motion Picture Theaters; 2. Ownership and Control of the Media Industries: Ownership Concentration: Motion Picture Industry, Motion Picture Theater Ownership; 3. Economics of the Media Industries: Motion Picture Finances, Fi- nances of the Major Film Production Companies, Motion Picture Theater Finances; 4. Employment and Training the Media Industries: Employment in the Motion Picture Industry; 5. Content Trends in the Media: Subject Matter of Motion Pictures; 6. Size and Characteristics of Media Audiences: Characteristics of Motion Picture Audiences; 7. U.S. Media Industries Abroad: Import/Export Trade in U.S. Motion Picture Industry.

Taubman, Joseph. Peforming Arts Management and Law. New York, NY: Law-Arts Publishing, 1972. 2 v.

Taubman, Joseph. Performing Arts Management and Law-Forms. New York, NY: Law-Arts Publishing, 1973. 2 v.

D. Censorship and Self-Regulation

Bertrand, Ina Ninneford. Censorship in Australia. St. Lucia, Austl: University of Queensland Press, 1978. 227 pp.

Bertrand, Ina Ninneford. Film Censorshipin Australia. St. Lucia, Austl: University of Queensland Press, 1978. 227 pp.

Camplin, R. Film Censorship: The Cinema and the Williams Commit- tee: A Talk London, UK: Cinematograph Exhibitor's Association of Great Britain & Ireland, 1978. 23 pp.

Carmen, Ira H. Movies, Censorship, and the Law. Ann Arbor, MICH: The University of Michigan Press, 1966. 339 pp. CONTENTS: I. The Supreme Court and the Right of Free Speech for Motion Pictures Under the Constitution: The "Early Period," 1915-52; II. Motion Pictures and the Right of Free Expression Under the Constitution: The "Modem Period," 1953-1965; III. State Cen- sorship of Motion Pictures; IV. Local Censorship of Motion Pictures; V. Conclusion. HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

De Grazia, Edward and Roger K. Newman. Banned Films: Movies, Censors, and the FirstAmendment. New York, NY: Bowker, 1982. 532 pp.

Ernst, Morris L. The First Freedom. New York, NY: Macmillan Co., 1946. 316 pp. A comprehensive review of government's role in the regulation of various mechanisms for the communication of ideas and information, including the press, radio, and movies. The author's thesis is that more is kept from the minds of the country's citizens by a lack of diversity of ownership of these mechanisms than by government interference.

Fleener-Marzec, Nickieann. D. W. Griffth's The Birth of A Nation: Con- troversy, Suppression, and the First Amendment as it Applies to Filmic Expression, 1915-1973. Salem, NY: Ayer Co. Press, 1980. 564 pp.

Great Britain. Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship. Obscenity and Film Censorship. Bernard Williams, editor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982. 192 pp.

Great Britain. Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship. Report of the Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship. London, UK: H.M.S.O., 1979. 270 pp. INCLUDES: I. Background: 2) The Present Law, 3) The Censorship of Films; II. Principles: 5) Law, Morality and the Freedom of Ex- pression, 6) Harms?, 7) Offensiveness, 8) Pornography, Obscenity and Art; III. Proposals: 9) The Restriction of Publications, 10) The Pro- hibition of Publications, 12) Films; APPENDICES: The Development of the Film Censorship System (Appendix 2); Obscenity Law and Practice Elsewhere (Appendix 3); Film Censorship in Other Countries (Appendix 4).

Harley, John Eugene. World- Wide Influences of the Cinema: A Study of Official Censorship and the InternationalCultural Aspects of Motion Pictures. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Press, 1940. 320 pp. Based on extensive research done by the Committee on International Relations of the American Institute of Cinematography, this volume is intended to summarize the role of the cinema in world affairs as of the time of publication. In so doing, it considers "Official Censor- ship," both in the United States and abroad; "Unofficial Censorship" in the United States; the role of cultural, documentary, and educational films; and "International Commerce in Films." 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hunnings, Neville March. Film Censors and the Law. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin, 1967. 474 pp. CONTENTS: I. England: The Local Authorities in England (1896- 1909), The Development of a Censorship System (1910-1924), Exten- sion and Consolidation of control (1925-1955), The British Board of Film Censors; II. Four Federal Countries: The United States of America, India, Canada, Australia; III. Three European Countries: Denmark, France, Soviet Russia, IV. Conclusion: The Nature of Film Censorship. APPENDIX 5: Some Constitutional Provisions Guaranteeing Free- dom of Expression: United States of America, India, Canada, Den- mark, France, Soviet Russia.

India. Enquiry Committee on Film Censorship. Report. New Delhi, In- dia: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 1969. 202 pp. INCLUDES: Film Censorship in Other Countries; The Legal Aspect of Film Censorship.

Inglis, Ruth A. Freedom of the Movies: A Report on Self-Regulation From the Commission on Freedom of the Press. Chicago, IL: Uni- versity of Chicago Press, 1947. 240 pp. (Reprinted by Da Capo Press, 1974.) CONTENTS: 1. The Social Role of the Screen; 2. History and Eco- nomics; 3. Early Attempts to Control; 4. The Evolution of Self-Regu- lation; 5. Self-Regulation in Operation; 6. Conclusions and Recommendations.

Nizer, Louis. New Courts of Industry: Self-Regulation Under the Motion Picture Code. New York, NY: Longacre Press, 1935. 344 pp. (Re- printed by Jerome S. Ozer, 1971.) Analyzes the operation of the Code of the Motion Picture Industry as established under authority of the N.R.A. in 1933. It reviews the problems sought to be resolved by the code and critically examines the degree of success achieved by the effort. O'Higgins, Paul. Censorship in Britain. London, UK: Nelson, 1972.

232 pp.

Phelps, Guy. Film Censorship. London, UK: Gollancz, 1975. 319 pp.

Randall, Richard S. Censorship of the Movies: The Social and Political Control of a Mass Medium. Madison, WIS; Milwaukee, WIS; and London, UK: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1968. 280 pp. CONTENTS: Part I, Introduction. 1. A Medium of Controversy; PartII, The Movies and the Law. 2. From "Business" to "Speech;" 3. Procedures: Pragmatic Assessment; 4. Objectives: Obscenity and Classification; Part111, Prior Censorshipin Operation. 5. Boards, Pro- cedures, and Decisions; 6. Limits, Costs, Constituents, Personnel, and HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Customs Censorship; PartIV, The Wider Milieu of Censorship. 7. In- formal Censorship and Control by the Criminal Process; 8. Nongov- ernmental Censorship: Advisory Ratings and Self-Regulation; Part V, Conclusion. 9. Freedom of Speech in a Mass Medium.

Great Britain. Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship. Report of the Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship. London, UK: H.M.S.O., 1979. 270 pp.

Schumach, Murray. The Face on the Cutting Room Floor: The Story of Movie and Television Censorship. New York, NY: William Morrow and Co., 1964. 305 pp. (Reprinted by Da Capo Press, 1974.) A historical review of the many ways censorship has been applied to motion picture and television productions, including various official efforts at regulation as well as self-censorship through ratings systems and similar mechanisms.

E. Copyright and Related Issues

Federal Bar Association of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. Joseph Taubman, editor. Subsidiary Rights and Residuals. New York, NY: Federal Legal Publications, 1968. 199 pp. INCLUDES: IV: Residuals, Taxes and the Unfairness of It All; V: Subsidiary Rights and Residuals in Motion Pictures; VI: Sale of Mo- tion Picture Rights in Plays.

Howell, Dorothy J. IntellectualProperties and the Protection of Fictional Characters: Copyright, Trademark, or Unfair Competition? Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 1990. 209 pp.

Hurst, Walter E. Copyright Registration Forms PA & SR: How to Pre- pare Applications to Register Songs, Movies, Performing Arts Works & Sound Recordings With the US. Copyright Office. Hollywood, CA: Seven Arts Press, 1979. 73 pp.

Hurst, Walter E. Your Introduction to Film-. V., Copyright, Contracts, and Other Law. Hollywood, CA: Seven Arts Press, 1973. 232 pp. Written for the layman involved in the motion picture industry; many sample forms; generalized discussion of various legal problems arising in the motion picture context, including contractual relationships, copyright, raising money, borrowing and buying equipment, privacy and libel, taxes, "selling" movies, distribution, motion picture music, producer-actor contracts and producer-writer contracts.

Lindey, Alexander. Plagiarism and Originality. New York, NY: Harper, 1952. 366 pp. INCLUDES: Plagiarism in Motion Pictures (pp. 152-167). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Nimmer, Melville B. Nimmer on Copyright. New York, NY: Matthew Bender, 1980. v. 1. VOLUME 1: Subject Matter of Copyright: Motion Pictures and Other Audio Visual Works (Sec. 2.09); Publication: Publication of Motion Pictures and Other Audio Visual Works (Sec. 4.11).

Sutak, Ken. The Great Motion PictureSoundtrack Robbery: An Analysis of Copyright Protection. Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1976. 111 pp.

Taubman, Joseph. Copyright and Antitrust. New York, NY: Federal Legal Publications, 1960. 217 pp.

F. Foreign Film-Making

Bertrand, Ina Ninneford. Film Censorship in Australia. St. Lucia, Aust: University of Queensland Press, 1978. 227 pp.

The British Film Industry: A Report on Its History and Present Organiza- tion, With Special References to the Economic Problems of British Feature Film Production. London, UK: Political and Economic Planning, 1952.

Camplin, R. Film Censorship: The Cinema and the Williams Commit- tee: A Talk. London, UK: Cinematograph Exhibitor's Association of Great Britain & Ireland, 1978. 23 pp.

Drabinsky, Garth H. Motion Pictures and the Arts in Canada: The Busi- ness and the Law. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1976. 201 pp. INCLUDES: I. The Fundamentals of Production; II. The Principles of Contract Law; III. Torts-Consideration of Defamation, Invasion of Privacy, and Insurance; IV. The Canadian Law of Copyright: Differences Between the Copyright Laws of Canada and the United States; V. The Acquisition of Film Rights in a Literary or Dramatic Property; VI. The Role of the Agent; VII. The Screenwriter and the Screen- play Agreement: Provisions of the ACTRA Collective Agreement; VIII. The Producer's Agreement with the Director: Provision of the Directors' Guild of Canada Collective Agreement; IX. The Talent Agreement: Provisions of the ACTRA Collective Agreement, The Loan-out Agreement-Tax Considerations; X. Music and Film; XI. Financing the Motion Picture: The Role of the Canadian Film Devel- opment Corporation, Foreign Subsidies, Coproduction Agreements, Financing by Way of a Production-Distribution Agreement (The Stu- dio Agreement); XII. The Distribution Agreement; XIII. The Dis- HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

tributor-Exhibitor Relationship and an Overview of the Nontheatrical Markets.

Great Britain. Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship. Report of the Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship. London, UK: H.M.S.O., 1979. 270 pp. INCLUDES: I. Background 2) The Present Law 3) The Censorship of Films II. Principles 5) Law, Morality and the Freedom of Expression 6) Harms? 7) Offensiveness 8) Pornography, Obscenity and Art III. Proposals 9) The Restriction of Publications 10) The Prohibition of Publications 12) Films; APPENDICES: The Development of the Film Censorship System (Appendix 2); Obscenity Law and Practice Elsewhere (Appendix 3); Film Censorship in Other Countries (Appendix 4).

Guback, Thomas H. The InternationalFilm Industry; Western Europe and America Since 1945. Bloomington, IND: Indiana University Press, 1969. 244 pp. APPENDICES: Royal Decree for the Aid of the Belgian Film Indus- try, Annuaire du Film Belge 1964, Cinematheque Royale De Belgique, Bruxelles; French-Italian Film Agreement of August 1, 1966, Textes du Cinema Francais, Center National de la Cinematographie, Volume 2, Title 5, Chapter 6.

Ivamy, Edward R. H. Show Business and the Law. London, UK: Ste- vens, 1955. 188 pp.

O'Higgins, Paul. Censorship in Britain. London, UK: Nelson, 1972. 232 pp.

G. Taxation

Hanlon, R. Brendan. A Guide to Taxes and Record Keepingfor Perform- ers, Designers, Directors. New York, NY: Drama Book Specialists, 1980. 92 pp.

Hanlon, R. Brendan. The New Tax Guide for Performers, Writers, Direc- tors, Designers, and Other Show Biz Folk New York, NY: Lime- light Editions, 1991.

Koppel, Robert C. and Bruce M. Stiglitz. Taxation of the Motion Pic- ture Industry. Washington, DC: Tax Management, 1978. 281 pp. A tightly structured discussion of all aspects of motion picture production and distribution affected by the tax laws. Contains model agreements covering production, sale distribution, actors' loan out, and private placement. 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Mannix, E.F. Tax and the Australian Film Industry. Sydney, Austl: Butterworths, 1981. 92 pp.

Moore, Schuyler M. The Filmed EntertainmentIndustry. Chicago, IL: Commerce Clearing House, 1988-. 1 v. Examines the significant tax issues that often arise in the filmmaking industry, in particular, those dealing with domestic production and distribution, methods of financing, and tax planning for talent. Sev- eral sample forms are included.

II Periodicals

Art and the Law. New York, NY: Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts. v. 1- 9, 1974-1985. Quarterly. (continues as Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts).

Cardozo Arts & EntertainmentLaw Journal. New York, NY: Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University. v. 1-, 1982-. Semiannual.

Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts. New York, NY: Columbia University School of Law and Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts. v. 10-, 1985-. Quarterly. (Formerly Art & the Law).

DePaul-LCA JournalofArt & EntertainmentLaw. Chicago, IL: DePaul University College of Law and Lawyers for the Creative Arts. v. 1-, 1991-. Semi-annual.

Entertainment & Sports Law Journal. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami School of Law, v. 1-5, 1984-1988. Semi-annual. (Continues as University of Miami Entertainment & Sports Law Review).

The Entertainment and Sports Lawyer. Chicago, IL: Forum Committee on the Entertainment and Sports Industries, American Bar Associa- tion. v. 1-, 1982-. Quarterly.

Entertainment Law Reporter. Santa Monica, CA: Entertainment Law Reporter Publishing Co. v. 1-, 1979-. Monthly.

Entertainment Litigation Reporter. Westtown, PA: Andrews Publica- tions. v. 1-, 1989-. Semi-monthly. HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Hastings Communications & EntertainmentLaw Journal (CoMM/ENT). San Francisco, CA: Hastings College of the Law. v. 1-, 1977-. Quarterly.

JournalofArts Management and Law. Washington, DC: Helen Dwight Reid Educational Foundation. v. 12-, 1982-. Quarterly.

Journal of Copyright, Entertainment and Sports Law. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Bar Association, Copyright, Entertainment, and Sports Law Section. v. 1-, 1982-.

Loyola Entertainment Law Journal. Los Angeles, CA: Loyola Law School. v. 1-, 1981-. Annual, 1981-1986. Semi-annual, 1987-.

University of Miami Entertainment& Sports Law Review. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami School of Law. v. 6-, 1989-. Semi-annual. (Formerly Entertainmentand Sports Law Journal).

III Legal Institute Program Materials

A. Practising Law Institute

Counseling Clients in the Entertainment Industry. Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series. New York, NY: Practising Law Institute, 1979-present. Course materials distributed at the annual continuing education program presented by PLI under this title since 1979. Each year's program is intended to bring attendees up-to-date on the latest developments relating to the entertainment industry so the specific topics covered vary from year to year. Typical topics have included personal management; home viewing and new technologies; merchan- dising, licensing, and endorsements; contract negotiation; and tax problems.

Counseling ProfessionalAthletes and Entertainers. Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series. New York, NY: Practising Law Institute, 1970-1974. Course materials distributed at an annual continuing education program presented by PLI. Volumes in 1970-71 were published in the Tax Law and Practice Course Handbook Series. Topics typically covered included counseling entertainers, the lawyer in the negotiation process, entertainment litigation, and tax planning. 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Legal and Business Problems of Financing Motion Pictures. Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series. New York, NY: Practising Law Institute, 1973, 1976, 1979. 3 v. Course materials for continuing education program presented several times during the 1970's, covering such topics as production/distribution agreements, gross receipts formula, insurance coverage, tax aspects, director's and actor's agreements, and screen play agreements.

B. UCLA Entertainment Symposium

Motion Pictures and Television: The "1990's and Beyond." Edited by Michael H. Lauer and Christopher C. Murray. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1990. 725 pp.

Motion Pictures and Television: A Techno-Transactional Revolu- tion-Survival in the '90's. Edited by Nicholas La Terza et al. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1988. 536 pp.

Reel of Fortune: A Discussion of the CriticalBusiness and Legal Issues Affecting Film and Television Today. Edited by Gregory M. Paul et al. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1987. 551 pp.

Following the Dollarsfrom Retail to Net Profits: An Examination of the Businesses of Creatingand Using Revenues from Motion Pictures and Television Programs. Edited by Keith G. Fleer, Gregory M. Paul, and Michael H. Lauer. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1986. 1 v.

Back to the Future: Prognbsticationson the Motion Pictureand Television Industries. Edited by Michael I. Adler, Keith G. Fleer, and Michael Lauer. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1985. 387 pp.

What's New?: Marketing, Markets and Money in Motion Pictureand Tel- evision Production. Edited by David R. Ginsburg and Michael I. Adler. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1984. 365 pp.

Who's Got the Money?... : The New Financing of Motion Picture and Television Production. Edited by Michael S. Sherman and David R. Ginsburg. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1983. 666 PP.

The Business and Legal Aspects of Representing Talent in the Entertain- ment Industry. Edited by Michael H. Lauer and Peter J. Dekom. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1982. 564 pp. HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

New Economic Fame: Money and Movies. Edited by Christine S. Cuddy, Gary Stiffelman, and Michael H. Lauer. Los Angeles, CA: Univer- sity of California, 1981. 704 pp.

The Selling of Motion Pictures in the 80's: New Producer/Distributor/ Exhibitor Relationships. Edited by Peter J. Dekom, Michael I. Ad- ler, David Ginsburg, and Michael Sherman. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1980.

InternationalAspects of Motion PictureFinancing, Production and Distri- bution. Edited by Peter J. Dekom, David R. Ginsburg, and Law- rence P. Taylor-Mortorff. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1979. 761 pp.

Sources of Revenue and PresaleFinancing for TheatricalMotion Pictures. Edited by Peter J. Dekom, Lawrence P. Mortorff, and Michael S. Sherman. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1977. 421 PP.

Legal and Related Business Aspects of Independent Film Production. Ed- ited by Peter J. Dekom, Lawrence P. Mortorf, and William Hornaday. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1976. 451 PP.

C. University of Southern California Law Center Entertainment Law Institute

Creation, Ownership and Control: Who Calls the Shots Here and Abroad? Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of Southern California, 1991. 1 v.

Music in Film/Film in Music. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of Southern California, 1990. 1 v.

Motion Pictures and Television: Foreign Financing, Production, and Dis- tribution. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of Southern California, 1989. 1 v.

Hiring and Firing in the EntertainmentIndustry. Los Angeles, CA: En- tertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of Southern California, 1988. 1 v. 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Term Arrangements in the Entertainment Industry. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of South- ern California, 1987. 1 v.

Current Developments Concerning the Representation of Performing Tal- ent-Motion Pictures, Television, Stage, Commercials and Music. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, Uni- versity of Southern California, 1984.

Fictional Charactersand Real People. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of Southern California, 1982. 344 pp.

Participationsin the Motion Picture, Television and Music Industries. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, Uni- versity of Southern California, 1981. 553 pp.

Representing Writers: Motion Pictures, Television, Books, Plays. Los An- geles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, Univer- sity of Southern California, 1978.

Exhibition and Distribution in the Motion PictureIndustry: Legal, Busi- ness and FinancialAspects. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of Southern California, 1976.

Non-Studio and Other Novel Methods of Financing Motion Pictures. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, Uni- versity of Southern California, 1974. 1 v.

PersonalService Agreements Revisited: Motion Pictureand Television In- dustries. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of Southern California, 1973. 1 v.

Forms of Agreement for Purchase and Sale Transactions in the Motibn Picture, Television, Phonograph Recording, and Music PublishingIn- dustries. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of Southern California, 1972. 1 v.

Syllabus and Forms on PercentageDeals in the Motion Picture, Television, Music and Recording Industries. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of Southern California, 1971. HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

ProductionMoney (Where the Money Is and What the Money Gets). Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, Uni- versity of Southern California, 1968. 1 v.

Syllabus and Forms on Producing and Financing Dramatic and Musical Plays and Acquiring Motion Picture Rights in Plays. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of Southern California, 1963. 1 v.

Syllabus and Forms on the New Collective BargainingAgreements. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, Uni- versity of Southern California, 1961. 1 v.

Syllabus and Forms on American Motion Picture Production in Foreign Countries. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of Southern California, 1959. 1 v.

Syllabus and Forms on Personal Service Contracts. Los Angeles, CA: Entertainment Law Institute, The Law Center, University of South- ern California, 1958. 1 v.

IV U.S. Government Publications A. Censorship, Ratings, and Regulation

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Role of the Feature Film Industry In A National Effort to Diminish Drug Use Among Young People. Hearing, 99th Cong., 1st Sess., Oct. 14, 1985. Wash- ington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1986. 158 pp. Examines drug and alcohol use depiction in feature films and the role of the motion picture industry in curbing drug and alcohol abuse among young people, including possible use of a movie rating category to indicate drug use depiction. Jack Valenti, president and CEO of the Motion Picture Association, explains the voluntary film rating system and expresses reservations about the use of a special film rating category to indicate drug use depiction. 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business. Sub- committee on Special Small Business Problems. Movie Ratings and the Independent Producer. Report No. 95-996, 95th Cong., 2d Sess., Mar. 21, 1978. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1978. 142 PP. Traces industry self-regulation development since 1909, summarizes March-July 1977 hearings testimony; includes findings, conclusions and recommendations.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business. Sub- committee on Special Small Business Problems. Movie Ratings and the Independent Producer. Hearings, 95th Cong., 1st Sess., Mar. 24, Apr. 14, May 12, June 15 and July 21, 1977. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1977. 223 pp. Witnesses include Jack Valenti (pp. 2-19), Sherrill Corwin (pp. 64- 68), Robert W. Selig (pp. 68-71), Reverend Patrick J. Sullivan (pp. 151-174), and Richard D. Hefner (pp. 195-210).

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. Subcommittee on Communications and Power. Films and Broadcasts Demeaning Ethnic, Racial or Religious Groups - 1971. Hearing, 92nd Cong., 1st Sess., Apr. 27-28, 1971. Washing- ton, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1971. 67 pp. Hearing on H. Con. Res. 9 and 182 relating to films and broadcasts which defame, stereotype, ridicule, demean, or degrade ethnic, racial and religious groups.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. Subcommittee on Communications and Power. Films and Broadcasts Demeaning Ethnic, Racial or Religious Groups. Hearing, 91st Cong., 2d Sess., Sept. 21, 1970. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1970. 97 pp. Hearing on H. Con. Res. 262 and H. Con. Res. 304 expressing the sense of Congress as favoring immediate cessation of the production and distribution in interstate commerce of films "which degrade, or demean racial, religious and ethnic groups and affect the moral behav- ior of all people throughout the Nation."

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interstate Commerce. Propaganda in Motion Pictures. Hearings, 77th Cong., 1st Sess., Sept. 9-26, 1941. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1942. 449 pp. Hearings on S. Res. 152, a resolution authorizing an investigation of war propaganda disseminated by the motion-picture industry and of any monopoly in the production, distribution or exhibition of motion pictures. HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education. Federal Motion Picture Commission. Hearing, 64th Cong., 1st Sess., 1916. (reprint, Garth S. Jowett, ed.). New York, NY: Arno, 1978. 234 pp. B. Economic Conditions and Labor

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Unfair Foreign Trade Practices. Hearings, 101st Cong., 1st Sess., Mar. 1-2, 1989. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1989. 403 pp. Hearings to examine implementation of provisions in the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 which call for retaliatory import restrictions against trading partners engaged in unfair trade practices. Motion picture industry is one area under consideration, with testimony provided by Jack Valenti, president and CEO of Motion Picture Association, and a submission by Motion Picture Export As- sociation detailing foreign market access for U.S. films in six countries (p. 243-260).

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Consumer Protection, and Finance. Minority Participation in the Media. Hearings, 98th Cong., 1st Sess., Sept. 19, 23, 1983. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1984. 278 pp. Examines programming and employment issues relating to minority participation in the broadcasting industry, focusing on television, but including discussion by individuals such as Sidney Poitier on the extent of discrimination against blacks and other minorities in both the motion picture and TV industries.

United States. Commission on Civil Rights. California Advisory Com- mittee. Behind the Scenes: Equal Employment Opportunity in the Picture Industry. Washington, DC: Commission on Civil Rights, 1978. 48 pp. CONTENTS: I. Introduction; II. The Nature of the Motion Picture Industry: Size and Composition of Work Force, The Hiring Process; III. The Motion Picture Industry in 1969: Equal Employment Op- portunity Commission Hearings, The Settlement Agreement; IV. The Major Studios in 1977: Affirmative Action, Barriers to Equal Oppor- tunity; V. Federal Enforcement Effort: Equal Employment Opportu- nity Commission, Office of Contract Compliance, Department of Labor; VI. Findings and Recommendations. 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

United States. Commission on Civil Rights. Hearing Held in Los Ange- les, California, March 16, 1977. Washington, DC: Commission on Civil Rights, 1977. 174 pp. Hearing conducted at request of California Advisory Committee for the purpose of subpoenaing the witnesses and listening to their testimony under oath. Witnesses include representatives of the Directors Guild of America, Paramount Pictures Corporation, Twentieth Cen- tury Fox Corporation, Association of Motion Picture and Television Producers, International Alliance of Theatrical and Stage Employees as well as other trade unions. Exhibits include various contracts, collective bargaining agreements and employment statistics.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. General Subcommittee on Labor. Unemployment Problems in American Film Industry. Hearings, 92nd Cong., 1st Sess., Oct. 29, 30, 1971. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1972. 105 pp. Hearings held in Los Angeles on Hollywood film industry unemployment and reasons for American film, production abroad. Also on H.R. 6069, the Domestic Film Production Incentive Act of 1971, offering tax relief for domestically produced film distribution, as well as other pending legislation and administrative employment-stipulating measures. Witnesses include John W. Lehners (pp. 7-14), Barry Goldwater Jr. (pp. 28-36) and Charlton Heston (pp. 75-86).

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Small Business. Motion Picture Trade Practices,1956: Problems of Independent Motion-Pic- ture Exhibitors. Report No. 2818, 84th Cong., 2d Sess., 1956. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1956. 760 pp.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Small Business. Motion Picture Distribution Trade Practices. Hearings, 83d Cong. 1st Sess., Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1953. 952 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Jurisdictional Disputes in the Motion-Picture Industry. Hearings before a special subcommittee. 80th Cong., 1st Sess., Feb.-Mar. 1948. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1948. 3 vols.

United States. Congress. Temporary National Economic Committee. Investigation of Concentration of Economic Power: Monograph No. 43: The Motion Picture Industry - A Pattern of Control. 76th Cong., 2d Sess., 1941. (reprint, Garth S. Jowett ed.). New York, NY: Arno, 1978.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. Motion-Picture Films (Compulsory Block Booking and HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Blind Selling). Hearings, 76th Cong., 3d Sess., 1940. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1940. 688 pp.

C. Taxation

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance. Tax Reform Act of 1972, Part 2. Hearing, 94th Cong., 2d Sess., Mar. 23-26, 1976. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt., Print. Off., 1976. Discusses tax reform for the motion picture industry (pp. 661-701); includes consideration of the recommended removal of loan leverage and long-term tax deferrals to correct tax shelter abuses; Insertion (pp. 678-682); Motion Picture tax structure summary.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance. Tax Revision Issues-1976 (H.R. 10612) 1: Tax Shelter Investments. Committee Print, 94th Cong., 2d Sess., Apr. 14, 1976. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1976. 127 pp. Report, prepared by the staff of the Joint Committee on Internal Rev- enue Taxation, reviewing present law and alternatives for revision of tax shelter investment options employed in movie production and distribution, and professional sports franchises. Also reviews tax shelter mechanisms and IRS rulings on prepaid interest and limited partnership formation.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. Tax Shelters: Movie Films. Committee Print, 94th Cong., 1st Sess., Sept. 10, 1975. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1975. 15 pp. Identifies questions in the present law, certain pertinent IRS rulings, and alternatives to film industry tax advantages.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. Ad- missions Tax on Motion-Picture Theaters. Hearings, 83d Cong., 1st Sess., Apr. 20, 1953. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1953. 120 pp.

D. "Un-American" Activities and Blacklisting

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Investigation of So-Call "Blacklisting" in Entertainment Field-Report of the Fund for the Republic, Inc. Hearings, 84th Cong., 2d Sess., July 1956. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1956. 244 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Communist Methods of Infiltration (Entertainment)Part II. 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hearings, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess., Dec. 14, 1954. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1954. 48 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Communist Infiltration of the Hollywood Motion-PictureIndus- try-Part X Hearings, 82nd Cong., 2d Sess., Nov. 12-13, 1952. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1952. 46 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Communist Infiltration of the Hollywood Motion-PictureIndus- try-Part IX. Hearings, 82nd Cong., 2d Sess., Aug. 19, Sept. 29, 1952. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1952. 33 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Communist Infiltration of the Hollywood Motion-PictureIndus- try-Part VIII Hearings, 82nd Cong., 2d Sess., May 19-21, 1952. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1952. 96 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Communist Infiltrationof the Hollywood Motion-PictureIndus- try-Part VII. Hearings, 82nd Cong., 2d Sess., Jan. 24, 28; Feb. 5; Mar. 20; Apr. 10, 30, 1952. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1952. 127 pp.

1951

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Communist Infiltration of the Hollywood Motion-PictureIndus- try-Part VI. Hearings, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess., May 10; Sept. 10-12, 1951. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1951. 73 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Communist Infiltration of the Hollywood Motion-PictureIndus- try-Part V. Hearings, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess., Sept. 20-25, 1951. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1951. 243 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Communist Infiltration of the Hollywood Motion-PictureIndus- try-Part IV Hearings, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess., Sept. 17-19, 1951. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1951. 223 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Communist Infiltration of the Hollywood Motion-Picture In- HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

dustry-Part II Hearings, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess., May 22-25; June 25-26 1951. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1951. 205 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Communist Infiltration of the Hollywood Motion-Picture In- dustry-Part 11. Hearings, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess., April 17, 23-25; May 16-18, 1951. Washington, DC: 229 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Communist Infiltration of the Hollywood Motion-PictureIndus- try-PartI. Hearings, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess., Mar. 8, 21; Apr. 10-13, 1951. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1951. 247 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activi- ties. Testimony of Edward G. Robinson. Hearings, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., Oct. 27; Dec. 21, 1950. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950. 45 pp.

United States. Congress. House. Committee. on Un-American Activi- ties. Hearings Regarding the Communist Infiltration of the Motion- PictureIndustry. 80th Cong., 1st Sess., October 20-24, 27-30, 1947. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1947. 549 pp. Hearings which led to conviction of the "Hollywood Ten." Witnesses include Bertolt Brecht, Gary Cooper, Walt Disney, Ayn Rand, and Ronald Reagan.

E. Video Recording and Piracy

United States. Congress. Joint Economic Committee. Subcommittee on Trade, Productivity, and Economic Growth. InternationalPiracy Involving Intellectual Property. Senate Hearing No. 99-1028, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess., Mar. 31, 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1987. 97 pp. Examines the problem of international infringement of U.S. copyright, trademark, and patent laws by the unauthorized reproduction and sale of motion pictures, music recordings, and other intellectual property. Jack Valenti, president of Motion Picture Association, and Charles Morgan, Vice-President of Universal City Studios, express views on international piracy of motion pictures. 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Home Video Recording. Senate Hearing No. 99-965, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess., Sept. 23, 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1986. 109 pp. Hearing to examine issues concerning the unauthorized home video tape copying of copyrighted movies and other material from video cassettes and discs. The pros and cons of video tape anticopying de- vices in recorders are presented.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice. Audio and Video First Sale Doctrine. Hearings, 98th Cong., lst-2nd Sessions, Oct. 6, 27; Dec. 13, 1983; Feb. 23; Apr. 12, 1984. Wash- ington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1985. 730 pp. Hearing considers H.R. 1029, a bill to prohibit the commercial rental, lease, or lending of motion pictures or other audiovisual works unless authorized by the copyright owner. Features testimony offered by a variety of witnesses both favoring and opposing this legislation, including that of Alan Hirschfield, CEO of Twentieth Century Fox (favoring), and several video company executives (opposing).

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Oversight on Inter- national Copyrights. Hearing, 98th Cong., 2nd Sess., Sept. 25, 1984. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1985. 187 pp. Testimony of David Ladd, Register of Copyrights, presents highlights of Copyright Office report (appended) on international copyright protection against piracy of books, records, and films.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks. Audio and Video Rental Hearing, 98th Cong., 1st Sess., Apr. 29, 1983. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1984. 338 pp. Hearing to consider S. 33, which would prohibit commercial rental, lease, or lending of motion pictures or other audiovisual works without authorization of the copyright owner.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Copy- right Infringements (Audio and Video Recorders). Hearings, 97th Cong., lst-2nd Sessions, Nov. 30, 1981, Apr. 21, 1982. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1982. 1384 pp. Hearings to consider copyright bill which would exempt from copyright infringement liability video recordings made by individuals for noncommercial use. This bill would reverse the 1981 Ninth Circuit decision in Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Sony Corp. It would also prohibit the commercial rental of motion pictures unless authorized by the copyright owner. HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Piracy and CounterfeitingAmendments Act of 1982. Report No. 97-495, 97th Cong., 2nd Sess., Apr. 29, 1982. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1982. 14 pp. Recommends passage of H.R. 3530, which increases penalties for trafficking in counterfeit labels for copyrighted records, tapes, and audiovisual works, and for copyright infringement of these products.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice. Copyright/Cable Television, Part 1. Hearings, 97th Cong., 1st Sess., May 14-July 22, 1981. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1982. 1018 pp. Includes testimony by James Bouras, representing the Motion Picture Association of America, as to the extent and impact of motion picture and record piracy and counterfeiting (pp. 766-97).

United States. Congress. Committee on the Judiciary. Piracyand Coun- terfeiting Amendments Act of 1981. Senate Report No. 97-274, 97th Cong., 1st Sess., Nov. 18, 1981. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1981. 15 pp. Recommends passage of S. 691, which increases penalties for trafficking in counterfeit labels for copyrighted records, tapes, and audiovisual works, and for copyright infringement of these products.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Criminal Law. Piracy and Counterfeiting Amendments Act of 1981: S. 691. Hearing, 97th Cong., 1st Sess., June 19, 1981. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1981. 68 pp. Considers bill that would increase penalties for trafficking in counterfeit labels for copyrighted records, tapes, and audiovisual works, and for copyright infringement of these products. Includes testimony by James Bouras, representing the Motion Picture Association of America, describing the extent of illegal duplication of films, videotapes, and their packaging (pp. 19-68).

F. Protecting the Artistic Rights of Filmmakers

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Moral Rights in Our Copyright Laws. Hearing, 101st Cong., 1st Sess., June 20; Sept. 20; Oct. 24; 1989. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1989. 1265 pp. Includes testimony by officials representing the Motion Picture Asso- ciation and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers. The testimony opposes proposed moral rights protections for film- 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

makers and other creative contributors to motion pictures, and asserts the benefits of alterations in motion picture format in producing videotapes and the adequacy of the collective bargaining process in protecting moral rights. Milos Forman, representing the Directors Guild, and filmmaker George Stevens, argue that moral rights protections are needed, collective bargaining is inadequate, and that colorization and other alterations in motion pictures destroys their importance to our cultural heritage.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988. Report No. 100-609, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess., May 6, 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1988. 66 pp. Recommends passage of H.R. 4262, an act to make U.S. copyright law compatible with Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, providing multilateral copyright protection for a variety of intellectual property forms, including motion pictures.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice. Film Integrity Act of 1987. Hearing, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess., June 21, 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1989. 164 pp. Hearing focuses on H.R. 2400, a bill to prohibit the alteration or colorization of a motion picture without the written consent of the principal director and screenwriter of the work. Witnesses include Arthur Hiller (director), Vincent Canby (critic), David Brown (producer), and Roger Mayer (CEO of Turner Entertainment Co.).

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. Berne Convention. Executive Report No. 100-17, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess., July 14, 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1988. 68 pp. Recommends Senate advice and consent to ratification of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, providing multilateral copyright protection for a variety of intellectual property forms, including motion pictures and video recordings.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988. Report No. 100-352, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess., May 20, 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1988. 67 pp. Recommends passage of S. 1301 to make U.S. copyright law compatible with the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Ar- tistic Works, providing multilateral copyright protection for a variety of intellectual property forms, including motion pictures and video recordings. HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Berne Convention. Hearing No. 100-801, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess., Feb. 18, March 3, 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1988. 616 pp. Hearings consider issues involved in bills designed to provide U.S. implementation of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Liter- ary and Artistic Works. Focuses on the "moral rights" provisions of the convention, allowing artists to protect their works against alteration. Witnesses include David Brown, representing the Motion Pic- ture Association and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, and filmmakers George Lucas and Steven Spielberg.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice. Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1987. Hearings, 100th Cong., lst-2nd Sessions, June 17, July 23, Sept. 16, 30, 1987, Feb. 9- 10, 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1988. 1390 pp. Hearings consider issues involved in H.R. 1623, a bill to amend the Copyright Act to provide for U.S. implementation of the Berne Con- vention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. Focuses on the "moral rights" provisions of the convention, allowing artists to protect their works against alteration. Witnesses include Peter Nolan, counsel for Walt Disney Co. and representing the Motion Picture As- sociation, expressing concern about foreign piracy of U.S. motion pictures but arguing against the inclusion of moral rights provisions in U.S. implementing legislation; and Sydney Pollack (Directors Guild) and Frank Pierson (Writers Guild) detailing the need for moral rights protections.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Technology and the Law. Legal Issues That Arise When Color is Added to Films Originally Produced, Sold, and Distributed in Black and White. Hearing, 100th Cong., 1st Sess., May 12, 1987. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1988. 187 pp. Examines issues involved in the addition of computer-generated color to black and white motion pictures without the permission of the directors. Objections to colorization and perspectives on the artistic aspects of filmmaking are offered by John Huston, Woody Allen, Milos Forman, Ginger Rogers, and James Stewart. Refutation of these arguments are presented by the CEOs of Color Systems Technology and the Turner Entertainment Company. 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. U.S. Adherence to the Berne Convention. Hearing, 99th Cong., lst-2nd Sessions, May 16, 1985, Apr. 15, 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1987. 734 pp. Examines issues involved in proposed U.S. adherence to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, providing multilateral copyright protection for a variety of intellectual property forms, including motion pictures and video recordings.

G. Miscellaneous

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Syndicated Televi- sion Music Copyright Reform Act of 1987. Hearing, 100th Cong., 1st Sess., Nov. 10, 1987. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1989. 323 pp. Considers S. 698, a bill to revise the system of licensing TV station broadcast of copyrighted music contained in the soundtrack of syndicated programs, motion pictures, and advertisements. It requires program producers or syndicators to acquire music rights from the composers or publishers (source license) and to convey all program rights in a package to TV stations.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice. Music Licensing Reform. Hearings, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess., Mar. 19, July 23, 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1987. 498 PP. Considers H.R. 3521, a bill to revise the system of licensing TV station broadcast of copyrighted music contained in the soundtrack of syndicated programs and motion pictures. It requires program producers or syndicators to acquire music rights for individual programs from the composers or publishers (source license) and to convey all program rights in a package to TV stations.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcom- mittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Source Licensing. Hearing, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess., April 9, 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1987. 648 pp. Considers S. 1980, a bill to revise the system for licensing TV station broadcast of copyrighted music contained in the soundtrack of syndicated programs motion pictures. It requires program producers or syndicators to acquire music rights for individual programs from the composers or publishers (source license) and to convey all program rights in a package to TV stations. HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Role of the Feature Film Industry In A National Effort to Diminish Drug Use Among Young People. Hearing, 99th Cong., 1st Sess., Oct. 14, 1985. Wash- ington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1986. 158 pp. Examines drug and alcohol use depiction in feature films and the role of the motion picture industry in curbing drug and alcohol abuse among young people, including possible use of a moving rating category to indicate drug use depiction. Jack Valenti, president and CEO of the Motion Picture Association, explains the voluntary film rating system and expresses reservations about the use of a special film rating category to indicate drug use depiction.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Aging. Media Por- trayal of the Elderly. Hearing, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess., Apr. 26, 1980. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1980. 99 pp. Examines television and motion picture industry practices regarding portrayal of the elderly, including alleged underrepresentation and negative stereotyping.

V Annotated Law Reports Annotations

Applicability of Sales or Use Taxes to Motion Pictures and Video Tapes, 10 A.L.R. 4TH 1209.

Apportionment and Computation of Profitsfor Which Copyright Infringer Is Liable, 2 A.L.R. 3D 121. Includes: Disposition of particular receipts and expenditures relating to specific types of infringing works, books, motion pictures, miscellaneous (Sec. 6).

Constitutionality of Regulation of Obscene Motion Pictures, 22 L. Ed. 2D 949.

Exhibition of Obscene Motion Pictures as Nuisance, 50 A.L.R. 3D 969.

FederalLegal Problems Arising from Subscription Television or "Pay TV" Broadcast over the Air, 61 A.L.R. Fed. 809.

Immoral or Obscene Materials as Subject to Copyright Protection, 50 A.L.R. Fed. 805. 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Liability for Injury or Death of Participantin Theatrical Performance or Spectacle, 67 A.L.R. 3D 451. Includes discussion of cases involving injury or death during movie filming.

Literary and Artistic Rightsfor Purposesof and Their Infringement by or in Connection with, Motion Pictures, Radio, and Television, 23 A.L.R. 2D 244.

Parody as Copyright Infringement or Fair Use Under Federal Copyright Act, 75 A.L.R. Fed. 822.

Processor'sRight to Refuse to Process or Return Film or Video Tape of Obscene Subject, 18 A.L.R. 4TH 1326.

Rights and Remedies of Co-Owners of Copyright, 3 A.L.R. 3D 1301.

Validity, Construction and Application of § 201(b)(3) and Related Provi- sions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000a(b)(3)), ProhibitingDiscrimination or Segregation in Motion-Picture Houses, Theaters, Concert Halls, Sports Arenas, Stadiums or Other Places of Exhibition of Entertainment, 7 A.L.R. Fed. 415.

VI Legal Periodical Articles A. Antitrust

Adams, Walter and James W. Brock. Vertical Integration, Monopoly Power, and Antitrust Policy: A Case Study of Video Entertainment. 36 Wayne Law Review 51-92 (1989).

Armstrong, Walter P., Jr. The Sherman Act and the Movies. 20 Temple Law Quarterly 442-471 (1947).

Armstrong, Walter P., Jr. The Sherman Act and the Movies: A Supple- ment. 26 Temple Law Quarterly 1-21 (1952).

Blind Bidding and the Motion PictureIndustry. 92 Harvard Law Review 1128-1147 (1979).

Cassady, Ralph, Jr. and Ralph Cassady III. Damage Measurement in Motion PictureIndustry PrivateAntitrust Actions. 37 Southern Cali- fornia Law Review 389-399 (1964). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Cassady, Ralph, Jr. Impact of the ParamountDecision on Motion Picture Distributionand Price Making. 31 Southern California Law Review 150-180 (1958).

Cassady, Ralph, Jr. Monopoly in Motion Picture Production and Distri- bution: 1908-1915. 32 Southern California Law Review 325-390 (1959).

Cirace, John. Five Conflicts Over Income Distribution in the Motion Pic- ture-Television Industry. 25 Villanova Law Review 417-457 (1980).

Conant, Michael. The Paramount Decrees Reconsidered. 44 Law and Contemporary Problems 79-107 (1981).

Crandall, Robert W. The PostwarPerformance of the Motion-Picture In- dustry. 20 Antitrust Bulletin 49-88 (1975).

Cray, Ed. Hollywood Unchained. 6 California Lawyer 32-35, 54 (Feb. 1986).

An Experiment in Preventive Antitrust: JudicialRegulation of the Motion Picture Exhibition Market Under the ParamountDecrees. 74 Yale Law Journal 1041-1112 (1965).

Fortenberry, Joseph E. The Dismal Science Goes Hollywood: Movie Pos- ters, Antitrust and the Imperfect Union of Law and Economics. 11 University of Toledo Law Review 91-120 (1979).

Grant, Charles H. Anticompetitive Practicesin the Motion Picture Indus- try and Judicial Support of Anti-Blind Bidding Statutes. 13 Colum- bia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 349-376 (1989)(also published in 19 Journal of Arts Management & Law 35-61 (Spring 1989)).

Judicial Regulation of the Motion-Picture Industry: The Paramount Case. 95 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 662-675 (1947).

Labor Pains, Movies and the Antitrust Blues. 20 UCLA Law Review 142-175 (1972).

Lee, W. E. Antitrust Enforcement, Freedom of the Press, and the "Open Market": The Supreme Court on the Structure and Conduct of Mass Media. 32 Vanderbilt Law Review 1249-1341 (1979).

Legislation by Consent in the Motion Picture Industry. 50 Yale Law Jour- nal 854-875 (1941). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Lieberman, John K. A Motion Picture Producer's Standing to Recover Treble Damages From a Movie Distributorfor Block Booking. 14 Journal of the Beverly Hills Bar Association 185-196 (1980).

McCoy, Charles W., Jr. The ParamountCases: Golden Anniversary in a Rapidly Changing Marketplace. 2 Antitrust 32-35 (Summer 1988).

McDonough, John R., Jr. and Robert L. Winslow. The Motion Picture Industry: United States v. Oligopoly. 1 Stanford Law Review 385- 427 (1949).

The Motion Picture Industry and the Antitrust Laws. 36 Columbia Law Review 635-652 (1936).

Motion Picture Split Agreements: An Antitrust Analysis. 52 Fordham Law Review 159-191 (1983).

Operation of the Consent Decree in the Motion PictureIndustry. 51 Yale Law Journal 1175-1195 (1942).

Phillips, Gerald F. Block Booking-PerhapsForgotten, PerhapsMisunder- stood, but Still Illegal. 6 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 3-7 (Summer 1987).

Price, Monroe E. and Mark S. Nadel. Antitrust Issues in the New Video Media. 3 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 27-52 (1984).

Price-Fixingin the Motion PictureIndustry. 41 Illinois Law Review 630- 646 (1947).

Restraints on Motion PictureExhibition and the Antitrust Laws. 33 Illi- nois Law Review 424-446 (1938).

The Sherman Act and the Motion PictureIndustry. 13 University of Chi- cago Law Review 346-361 (1946).

Whitman, William F. AntiTrust Cases Affecting the Distribution of Mo- tion Pictures. 7 Fordham Law Review 189-202 (1938).

Whitman, William F. The Consent Decree in the Moving PictureIndus- try. 10 Fordham Law Review 65-73 (1941). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

B. Business Aspects of Motion Pictures 1. Financing and Production

Abraham, Robin A. Hollywood Moves East: A Legal Perspective on Fea- ture Motion PictureProduction (Part1). 62 Florida Bar Journal 49- 51 (Oct. 1988).

Abraham, Robin A. Hollywood Moves East: A Legal Perspective on Fea- ture Motion Picture Production (Part2) 62 Florida Bar Journal 53- 55 (Nov. 1988).

Appel, Martin S. Motion PictureService Company. A Service to the Mo- tion PictureIndustry? 27 Southern California Tax Institute 559-600 (1975).

Ballantine, Frank. Non-Profit Entrepreneurship: The Astoria Motion Pic- ture and Television Center. 12 Journal of Arts Management and Law 5-25 (Spring 1982).

Bartasi, Thomas. Trade Screening Laws: A Survey and Analysis. 6 CoMM/ENT, Hastings Journal of Communications and Entertain- ment Law 91-135 (1983).

Concoff, Gary 0. Motion Picture Secured Transactions Under the Uni- form Commercial Code: Problems in Perfection. 13 UCLA Law Re- view 1214-1240 (1966).

Controversy in Film Contract Construction: Alperson v. Mirisch. 1 Uni- versity of San Fernando Valley Law Review 87-94 (1967).

Cryan, Thomas Joseph, David W. Johnson, James S. Crane and Anthony Cammarata. Strategiesfor the InternationalProduction and Distri- bution of Feature Film in the 1990's. 8 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 1-24 (1990).

Drabinsky, Garth H. Feature Film Production in Canadaand the Newly Proposed Tax Shelter Regulations: Enlightment or Tunnel Vision? 1981 Canadian Tax Foundation, Report of 33rd Conference 310-316 (1981).

Dyke, William D. What Do Airplanes, Railroad Cars, Beef Cattle, Mo- tion Pictures, Real Estate and Oil Wells All Have in Common? 48 Wisconsin Bar Bulletin 63-69 (June 1975). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

The Effect of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 on Motion Picture Financing. 12 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 307-331 (1988).

Gaines, Frederic N. and Jonathan David Bader. From Pitch to Profit: An Overview of the Motion Picture ProductionProcess. 9 Los Ange- les Lawyer 23-29 (Apr. 1986).

Holmes, Jeffrey D. Investing in Independent Motion Pictures Through Small Business Investment Companies. 13 University of California Davis Law Review 948-968 (1980).

Independent Motion PictureFinancing: UnregisteredLimited Partnership Offerings. 1989 Brigham Young University Law Review 1287-1314.

Jacobson, Lawrence H. Independent Motion Picture Production-Choice of ProductionEntity. 9 Journal of the Beverly Hills Bar Association 33-39 (Mar.-Apr. 1975).

Kanter, Burton W. and Calvin Eisenberg. What Alice Sees Through the Looking Glass When Movieland Seeks Creative Techniques for Fi- nancing Films. 53 Taxes 94-121 (1975).

Kells, Peter C. Behind Hollywood's Cameras: Motion PictureAccounting and Financing. 160 Journal of Accountancy 140 (1985).

Kilgannon, Mary Elizabeth. Motion PictureLicensing Acts: An Analysis of the Constitutionality of Their Provisions. 51 Fordham Law Re- view 293-319 (1982).

Klein, William A. The Put-Up-Or-Shut- Up Strategy in Business Negotia- tions. 17 University of California Davis Law Review 341-358 (1983).

Levine, Michael A. and David B. Zitzerman. Foreign Productions and Foreign Financing: The Canadian Perspective. 5 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 6-10, 27-31 (Spring 1987).

Lilliston, Bruce St. J. FinancingFilm and Television Productions. 13 Los Angeles Lawyer 38-40, 55 (Apr. 1990).

Lilliston, Bruce St. J. Financing Independent Films. 11 Los Angeles Lawyer 19-23 (May 1988).

Marshall, William T. Investing in Australia'sFilm Future. 58 Law Insti- tute Journal 1048-1053 (1984). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Martin, Scott M. and Peter W. Smith. The Unconstitutionality of State Motion Picture Film Lien Laws (Or How Spike Lee Almost Lost It). 39 American University Law Review 59-122 (1989).

Net Profit Participationsin the Motion Picture Industry. 11 Loyola En- tertainment Law Journal 23-65 (1991).

Nochimson, David and Leon Brachman. Contingent Compensationfor Theatrical Motion Pictures. 5 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 3- 6, 14-18 (Summer 1986).

Osdene, Clare S. You Ought to Be in Pictures. 12 Current Municipal Problems 20-24 (1985-1986).

Pulverman, Heinz J. and Alan J. Setlin. A New Approach to Risk Cover- age in the Motion Picture Industry: Short-Term Life Insurance. 2 COMM/ENT, A Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 87-96 (1979).

Sills, Steven D. and Ivan L. Axelrod. Profit Participationin the Motion PictureIndustry. 12 Los Angeles Lawyer 31-33, 54-57 (Apr. 1989).

Simplified Syndication for Stage and Screen: A Proposalfor Modifying Securities Laws for the Financing of Theater and Film Production. 13 Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal (CoMM/ENT) 533-552 (1991).

Sinclair, Nigel and Steven Gerse. Representing Independent Motion Pic- ture Producers: How to Steer the Producer Through the Many Pit- falls in the Business of Development and Production. 11 Los Angeles Lawyer 25-29 (May 1988).

Stocks, T. E. Creative Financing and the Films Act 1985. 129 Solicitors Journal 579-580 (1985).

Stout, John H. FinancingMotion Pictures Under Nonpublic and Limited Offering Exemptionsfrom FederalSecurities Laws. 2 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 1, 7-14 (Fall 1983).

The Tax Reform Act of 1976 and Tax Incentives for Motion Picture In- vestment: Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water. 58 Southern California Law Review 839-869 (1985).

Weiss, Robert G. and Alan G. Benjamin. Feature Film Secured Financ- ing: A TransactionalApproach for Lender's Counsel. 5 COMM/ENT, 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

A Journal of Communications & Entertainment Law 75-94 (1982) (also published in 15 Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal 195- 212 (1983)).

Winter, Richard A. Film and Television Production and Distribution in Canada: Recent Developments. 22 Beverly Hills Bar Association Journal 123-143 (1988).

Wise, Richard M. Evaluating Motion Picture Film Investments. 1978 Canadian Tax Foundation, Report of the 30th Tax Conference 666- 680 (1980).

Zitzerman, David B. and Michael A. Levine. Producinga Film in Can- ada-The Legal and Regulatory Framework. 8 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 15-28 (Winter 1991).

2. Distribution

Anderson, Martin G. State Regulation of Motion PictureDistributors. 3 Pace Law Review 107-133 (1982).

Anti-Blind Bidding Legislation in the Motion Picture Industry: Associ- ated Film Distribution Corp. v. Thornburgh. 5 Journal of Law and Commerce 293-313 (1985).

Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Wick: Striking Down Government Regulations Regarding the Export of U.S. Movies. 19 Golden Gate University Law Review 37-45 (1989).

Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Wick: Can the Government Condition Film- makers' Access to Duty-Free Foreign DistributionBased on Ideology? 14 North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 329-350 (1989).

Cassady, Ralph Jr. Impact of the ParamountDecision on Motion Picture Distributionand PriceMaking. 31 Southern California Law Review 150-180 (1958).

Cassady, Ralph, Jr. Monopoly in Motion Picture Production and Distri- bution. 32 Southern California Law Review 325-390 (1959).

Cohen, Jerry. Abolition of an Unfair Business Practice-Anti-BlindBid- ding Statute for the Motion PictureIndustry. 65 Massachusetts Law Review 239 (1980). HASTINGS COMM/EN" L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Coming to a Theater Near You: Movie DistributorsChallenge Exhibitor Instigated Anti-Blind Bidding Statutes. 3 Cardozo Arts & En- tertainment Law Journal 155-179 (1984).

Cray, Ed. Hollywood Unchained. 6 California Lawyer 32-35, 54 (Febru- ary 1986).

Drabinsky, Garth H. FeatureFilm Production in Canada and the Newly Proposed Tax Shelter Regulations: Enlightment or Tunnel Vision? 1981 Canadian Tax Foundation, Report of 33rd Conference 310-316 (1981).

Ellis, F. Henry, III. ConstitutionalLaw-Film Export Regulations, Con- stitutionality of United States Information Agency Regulations Im- plemented to Ease the InternationalFlow of Audio- Visual Materials. 13 Suffolk Transnational Law Journal 392-402 (1989).

An Experiment in Preventive Antitrust: JudicialRegulation of the Motion Picture Exhibition Market Under the Paramount Decrees. 74 Yale Law Journal 1041-1112 (1965).

Grant, Charles H. Anticompetitive Practicesin the Motion Picture Indus- try and Judicial Support of Anti-Blind Bidding Statutes. 13 Colum- bia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 349-376 (1989). (Also published in 19 Journal of Arts Management & Law 35-61 (Spring 1989)).

Kenney, Roy W. and Benjamin Klein. The Economics of Block Booking. 26 Journal of Law and Economics 497-540 (1983).

Leibowitz, David E. The Sequential Distribution of Television Program- ming in a Dynamic Marketplace. 34 Catholic University Law Re- view 671-696 (1985).

McCoy, Charles W., Jr. The ParamountCases: Golden Anniversary in a Rapidly Changing Marketplace. 2 Antitrust 32-35 (Summer 1988).

Phillips, Gerald F. The Recent Acquisition of Theatre Circuits by Major Distributors. 5 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 1-2, 10-23 (Winter 1987).

Restraints on Motion PictureExhibition and the Antitrust Laws. 33 Illi- nois Law Review 424-446 (1938). 19911 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Schiller, Suzanne Ilene. The Relationship Between Motion PictureDistri- bution and Exhibition: An Analysis of the Effects of Anti-Blind Bid- ding Legislation. 9 COMM/ENT, Hastings Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 131-159 (1986).

Silenced Screens: The Role of the United States Information Agency in Denying Export Certificates to American Films. 17 New York Uni- versity Journal of International Law and Politics 77-111 (1984).

Statfield, Ira J. Blind Bidding: Or, What Should Be Playing at the Bijou? 11 Performing Arts Review 27-61 (1981).

Theatre "Splits" Under Fire: The Capitol Service Case. 5 Loyola En- tertainment Law Journal 241-244 (1985).

A Trade-Based Response to Intellectual Property Piracy: A Comprehen- sive Plan to Aid the Motion Picture Industry. 76 Georgetown Law Journal 417-465 (1987).

Two Courts Void USIA Documentary Regs; Agency Denials of Film Ex- port Certificates Labeled 'Censorship' by Appeals Courts. 12 News Media & the Law 23-24 (Summer 1988).

USIA Censorship of Education Filmsfor DistributionAbroad. 3 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 403-425 (1984).

Whitman, William F. Antitrust Cases Affecting the Distribution of Mo- tion Pictures. 7 Fordham Law Review 189-202 (1938).

Winter, Richard A. Film and Television Production and Distribution in Canada: Recent Developments. 22 Beverly Hills Bar Association Journal 123-143 (1988).

3. Labor and Employment Issues

Beatson, Jack. Restitutionary Remedies for Void and Ineffective Con- tracts. 105 Law Quarterly Review 179-183 (1989).

Berman, Bayard F. and Sol Rosenthal. Enforcement of PersonalService Contracts in the EntertainmentIndustry. 7 Beverly Hills Bar Asso- ciation Journal 49-59 (Sept. 1973), 24-26 (Nov./Dec. 1973).

Campling, John. Labour Practices in TV and Film Making. 19 Indus- trial Law Journal 46-47 (Mar. 1990). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. (Vol. 14:137

Christopherson, Susan and Michael Storper. The Effects of Flexible Spe- cialization on IndustrialPolitics and the Labor Market: The Motion Picture Industry. 42 Industrial and Labor Relations Review 331- 347 (1989).

The Dangerof Illusion: A Critique of Safety Regulations in the Television and Motion Picture Industry. 6 COMM/ENT, Hastings Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 137-161 (1983).

Galloway, Gregory B. Right To Work and the EntertainmentIndustry. 63 Florida Bar Journal 84-86 (June 1989).

Injunctions-UnjustRestraints on Entertainersin California. 1 Entertain- ment Law Journal 91-111 (1981).

Jacobson, Marc. Film Directors'Agreements. 64 Florida Bar Journal 76- 77 (Apr. 1990). (Also published in 8 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 7-9 (Spring 1990)).

Labor Pains, Movies and the Antitrust Blues. 20 UCLA Law Review 142-175 (1972).

Larner, Andrew S. The Writers Guild of America Strike of 1988: A Question of Respect. 14 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 75-89 (1989).

The Loss of Publicity as an Element of Damagesfor Breach of Contract to Employ an Entertainer. 27 University of Miami Law Review 465- 480 (1973).

Meyer, Michael and Susan Oman. Production Company Remedies for "Star" Breaches. I Entertainment Law Journal 25-30 (1981).

Nizer, Louis. Duty to Bargain in the Motion PictureIndustry. 43 Colum- bia Law Review 705-719 (1943).

Price, Todd Alan and Steven R. Gordon. Directors Guild Versus Film and Television Producers: Strike 1. 6 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 3-5 (Winter 1988).

Rosen, Ronald S. Arbitration in the Entertainment Industry-Selected Problems and Suggestions. 7 Beverly Hills Bar Association Journal 32-42 (Nov./Dec. 1973). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY 177

Schiff, Gunther H. At a Disadvantage-IndependentProducers in Arbitra- tion with the DGA and WGA. 4 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 7-8 (Summer 1985).

Simensky, Melvin. Determining Damages for Breach of Entertainment Agreements. 8 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 1-2, 11-16 (Spring 1990).

Tannenbaum, David. Enforcement of Personal Service Contracts in the Entertainment Industry. 42 California Law Review 18-27 (1954).

C. Censorship and Regulation of Motion Picture Content 1. In General

Brychta, I. The Ohio Film Censorship Law. 13 Ohio State Law Journal 350-411 (1952). Cambell, B.L. The Quebec Moving Pictures Act: Some Constitutional Notes. 11 McGill Law Journal 131-136 (1965).

Censorship of Motion Pictures. 49 Yale Law Journal 87-113 (1939).

Censorship of Moving Picture Films as an Interference with the Freedom of the Press. 2 Virginia Law Review 216-218 (1914).

Coldham, Simon. Reports of the Committee on Obscenity and Film Cen- sorship. 43 Modern Law Review 306-318 (1980).

ConstitutionalLaw-Censorship of Moving PicturesAs Due Process of Law. 13 Michigan Law Review 515-516 (1914).

Constitutional Law-Police Power-Freedom of the Press-Censorship of Moving Pictures. 15 Columbia Law Review 546 (1915).

Entertainment: Public Pressures and the Law. 71 Harvard Law Review 326-367 (1957).

Film Censorship: An Administrative Analysis. 39 Columbia Law Review 1383-1405 (1939).

Film Censorship-Somethingfor Everyone. 40 Modern Law Review 74-79 (1977).

Film Is a Four Letter Word. 5 Memphis State University Law Review 41-58 (1974). 178 HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Kadin, Theodore. Administrative Censorship: A Study of the Mails, Mo- tion Pictures and Radio Broadcasting. 19 Boston University Law Review 533-585 (1939). Kupferman, Theodore R. and Philip J. O'Brien. Motion Picture Censor- ship-The Memphis Blues. 36 Cornell Law Quarterly 273-300 (1951). The Legal Aspect of Motion Picture Censorship. 44 Harvard Law Review 113-117 (1930). Lively, Donald E. Fear and the Media: A First Amendment Horror Show. 69 Minnesota Law Review 1071-1097 (1985). Manchester, Colin. Controlling Obscene Films in Post-War Britain. 10 Performing Arts Review 327-351 (1980). McMaster, W. A. Censorship and the Supreme Court. 5 Dalhouse Law Journal 737-759 (1979). Motion Pictures and the FirstAmendment. 60 Yale Law Journal 696-719 (1951). Movie Censorship and the Supreme Court- What Next? 42 California Law Review 122-138 (1954). Nimmer, Melville B. The Constitutionality of Official Censorship of Mo- tion Pictures. 25 University of Chicago Law Review 625-657 (1958). Richards, Jef I. Obscenity and Film: An Empirical Dilemma. 6 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 7-30 (Jan. 1986). Robertson, Geoffrey. The Future of Film Censorship. 7 British Journal of Law and Society 78-94 (1980). What Films We May Watch: Videotape Distribution and the First Amendment. 136 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1263- 1300 (1988). X-rated Motion Pictures: From Restricted Theatres and Drive-Ins to the Television Screen. 8 Valparaiso University Law Review 107-124 (1973). 19911 BIBLIOGRAPHY

2. Self-Censorship and Rating Systems

An Antitrust Challenge to the GPGRX Movie Rating System. 6 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 545-557 (1971).

Austin, Bruce A. G-PG-R-X: The Purpose, Promise and Performance of the Movie Rating System. 12 Journal of Arts Management and Law 51-74 (Summer 1982).

Ayer, Douglas, Roy E. Bates and Peter J. Herman. Self-Censorship in the Movie Industry: An Historical Perspective on Law and Social Change. 1970 Wisconsin Law Review 791-838.

Friedman, Jane M. Motion Picture Rating System of 1968: A Constitu- tional Analysis of Self-Regulation by the Film Industry. 73 Colum- bia Law Review 185-240 (1973).

Private Censorship of Movies. 22 Stanford Law Review 618-656 (1970).

Private Ratings of Motion Pictures as a Basis for State Regulation. 59 Georgetown Law Journal 1205-1236 (1970).

Reidinger, Paul. Rated X; Film Classifications Survive Challenge. 76 American Bar Association Journal 96 (Nov. 1990).

3. Violence in Motion Pictures

Censorship of Violent Motion Pictures: A ConstitutionalAnalysis. 53 In- diana Law Journal 381-398 (1977-1978).

Missouri Statute Attacks 'Violent' Videos: Are FirstAmendment Rights in Danger? 10 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 655-678 (1990).

Rosencrans, Suzanne. Fighting Films: A First Amendment Analysis of Censorship of Violent Motion Pictures. 14 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 451-474 (1990).

4. Adult Motion Picture Theaters

ConstitutionalLaw: Adult Entertainment Ordinances Should Be Applied Only to Movie Theaters at Which Sexually Explicit Films "Constitute A SubstantialPortion of the Films Shown." Under No Circumstances Can a Single Showing of an Adult Film Make a Theater Subject to Enforcement. 17 Pepperdine Law Review 526-529 (1990). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [V/ol. 14:137

Constitutional Law-First Amendment-Freedom of Expression-Zoning- Adult Entertainment-Districts-Youngv. American Mini Theatres, Inc. 22 New York Law School Law Review 753-763 (1977).

ConstitutionalLaw: Municipal Zoning Ordinance May Restrict Location of Adult Motion Picture Theatres. 16 Washburn Law Journal 479- 489 (1977).

ConstitutionalLaw-Nuisance Abatement-Alabama's "Red Light" Abate- ment Act Held Applicable to Obscene Movies as PermanentlyEnjoin- able Nuisances. 10 Cumberland Law Review 593-603 (1979).

Content-Based Classificationsof Protected Speech: A Less Vital Interest? Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc. 1976 Utah Law Review 616-630.

Friedman, Jane M. Zoning "Adult" Movies: The Potential Impact of Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc. 28 Hastings Law Journal 1293-1304 (1977).

Goldman, Roger L. A Doctrine of Worthier Speech: Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc. 21 St. Louis University Law Journal 281-307 (1977).

State Regulation of Obscene Motion Pictures: The Red Light Nuisance Statute. 31 Alabama Law Review 274-305 (1980).

Theater License Fee Based on Film Content Violates Equal Protectionand Free Speech Guarantees. 29 Mercer Law Review 335-339 (1977).

Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.: Creating Levels of Protected Speech. 4 Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 321-359 (1977).

5. Propagandaand Political Censorship

Blodgett, Nancy. Film Censorship; USIA Regulations Challenged. 72 American Bar Association Journal 34 (Mar. 1986).

Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Wick: Striking Down Government Regulations Regarding the Export of U.S. Movies. 19 Golden Gate University Law Review 37-45 (1989).

Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Wick: Can the Government Condition Film- makers' Access to Duty-Free Foreign DistributionBased on Ideology? 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

14 North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 329-350 (1989).

Dorfman, Anne. Neutral Propaganda: Three Films "Made in Canada" and the Foreign Agents Registration Act. 7 COMM/ENT, Hastings Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 435-468 (1985).

Labeling Canadian Films 'Propaganda'Does Not Infringe Freedom of Speech. 11 News Media & the Law 14-16 (Summer 1987).

Lipschultz, Jeremy Harris. "PoliticalPropaganda": The Supreme Court Decision in Meese v. Keene. 11 Communications and the Law 25- 43 (Dec. 1989).

Meese v. Keene: An Attempt to Keep the FirstAmendment from Raining on the CongressionalParade. 17 Southwestern University Law Re- view 373-408 (1987).

Rosten, Keith A. Legal Control of the Soviet Cinema: The Scenario Writer's Contract. 14 Rutgers Law Journal 115-133 (1982).

Silenced Screens: The Role of the United States Information Agency in Denying Export Certificates to American Films. 17 New York Uni- versity Journal of International Law and Politics 77-111 (1984).

Smolla, Rodney A. and Stephen A. Smith. Propaganda,Xenophobia, and the First Amendment. 67 Oregon Law Review 253-285 (1988).

Two Courts Void USIA Documentary Regs; Agency Denials of Film Ex- port Certificates Labeled 'Censorship' by Appeals Court. 12 News Media & the Law 23-24 (Summer 1988).

USIA Censorship of Education Filmsfor DistributionAbroad. 3 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 403-425 (1984).

D. Copyright and Related Issues 1. Copyright

Abend v. MCA. Copyright Law Journal 14 (Feb. 1989).

Allen, Barbara A. and Susan R. Swift. Shattering Copyright Law: Will James Stewart's Rear Window Become a Pane in the Glass? 22 Pa- cific Law Journal 1-42 (1990). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Berman, Bayard F. and Joel E. Boxer. Copyright Infringement ofAudio- visual Works and Characters. 52 Southern California Law Review 315-332 (1979).

Bernstein, Irvin E. The Motion Picture Distributorand the Copyright Law. 2 Copyright Law Symposium 119-149 (1940).

Bricker, Seymour M. Ownership of Copyrights. 9 Bulletin of the Copy- right Society of the U.S.A. 451-459 (1961).

Brown, Ralph S. The Widening Gyre: Are Derivative Works Getting Out of Hand? 3 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 1-25 (1984).

Brylawski, E. Fulton. Copyrightabilityof Motion PictureSound Tracks. 18 Bulletin of the Copyright Society 357-370 (1971).

Classic Motion Pictures Based on Copyrighted Stories-Ninth Circuit Leaves Legacy of Confusion. 63 St. John's Law Review 629-643 (1989).

Cohen, Jonathan D. Remedies For Misappropriation of Motion Picture and Television Story Ideas. 7 COMM/ENT, Hastings Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 85-110 (1984).

Colby,' Richard. Copyright Revision Revisited: Commissioned Works as Works Made for Hire Under the United States Copyright Act. 5 Whittier Law Review 491-514 (1983).

Colby, Richard. Rohauer Revisited: "Rear Window," Copyright Rever- sions, Renewals, Terminations, Derivative Works and Fair Use. 13 Pepperdine Law Review 569-605 (1986).

Colby, Richard. Some Essentials in Copyright Revision for Motion Pic- tures. 11 Bulletin of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 19-23 (1963-1964).

Copyright Infringement: An Argument for the Elimination of the Scene a Fair Doctrine. 5 COMM/ENT, A Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 147-169 (1982).

Copyright Infringement: Substantial Similarity Found Lacking. 5 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 234-240 (1985). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Derivative Copyright and the 1909 Act-New Clarity or Confusion? 44 Brooklyn Law Review 905-933 (1978).

"Disk-Television": Some Recurring Copyright Problems in the Reproduc- tion and Performanceof Motion Pictures. 34 University of Chicago Law Review 686-703 (1967). (Also published in 16 Copyright Law Symposium 143-169 (1966)).

Dreier, Thomas K. Copyright and Film: The Infringement of Copy- righted Works by Motion Picture. 6 Communications and the Law 33-54 (Dec. 1984).

Ellingson, Carol A. The Copyright Exception for Derivative Works and the Scope of Utilization. 56 Indiana Law Journal 1-32 (1980-1981). [Also published in 20 Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising & Al- lied Fields Law Quarterly 25-76 (1981).]

A Famous Title Is Worth 1,000 Publicity Stunts: Does the Owner of the Motion Picture Copyright to 'The Amityville Horror' Own the Title? 10 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 715-736 (1990).

Gertz, Ronald H., Anita Ross Van Petten, and Vance Scott Van Petten. Clearanceof Rightsfor Motion Pictureand Television Production. 8 Century City Bar Association Journal 42 (1983).

Goldstein, Paul. Derivative Rights and Derivative Works in Copyright. 30 Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 209-252 (1983).

Jaszi, Peter. When Works Collide: Derivative Motion Pictures, Underly- ing Rights, and the Public Interest. 28 UCLA Law Review 715-815 (1981).

Karp, Irwin. From Roth to Rohauer: Twenty Years of Amicus Briefs. 25 Bulletin of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 1-18 (1977).

Krasilovsky, M. William and Robert S. Meloni. Copyright Law as a Protection Against Improvidence: Renewals, Reversions and Termi- nations. 5 Communications and the Law 3-37 (Fall 1983).

Lange, David. Recognizing the Public Domain. 44 Law and Contempo- rary Problems 147-178 (1981).

Lewis, Matthew P. Bringing Down the Curtain on Rear Window: Copy- right Infringement and Derivative Motion Pictures. 10 Loyola En- tertainment Law Journal 237-260 (1990). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Lloyd, Boardman. "Disk-television':. Recurring Problems in the Per- formance of Motion Pictures. 16 Copyright Law Symposium 143- 169 (1968).

Martin, Scott M. and Peter W. Smith. The Unconstitutionality of State Motion PictureFilm Lien Laws (Or How Spike Lee Almost Lost It). 39 American University Law Review 59-122 (1989).

Moyles. Russell v. Price: A Limitation on the Use of Derivative Works. 11 Golden Gate University Law Review 323-333 (1981).

Nemschoff, Louise and Nancy Weingrow Eagle. Back to the Future: Ex- ploiting Vintage Films in the Public Domain. 10 Los Angeles Law- yer 34-41 (May 1987).

Nevins, Francis M., Jr. Copyright, Property and the Film Collector. 29 Rutgers Law Review 2-34 (1975).

Nevins, Francis M., Jr. The Doctrine of Copyright Ambush: Limitations on the Free Use of Public Domain Derivative Works. 25 St. Louis University Law Journal 58-86 (1981).

Nevins, Francis M., Jr. The Film Collector, the FBI, and the Copyright Act. 26 Cleveland State Law Review 547-560 (1977).

Nevins, Francis M., Jr. RXfor Copyright Death. 1977 Washington Uni- versity Law Quarterly 601-625.

Nolan, Peter F. A Brighter Day for the Magic Lantern: Thoughts on the Impact of the New Copyright Act on Motion Pictures. 11 Loyola University of Los Angeles Law Review 1-44 (1977).

Nolan, Peter F. Copyright Protection for Motion Pictures: Limited or Perpetual? 18 Copyright Law Symposium 174-205 (1970).

Pendleton, Michael D. China'sFirst Court Decision on Copyright: Jiang v. Qiao and the Film 'Hospital Ward No. 16.' 12 European Intellec- tual Property Review 217-219 (1990).

Rohauer v. Killiam Shows, Inc. and the Derivative Work Exception to the Termination Right: Inequitable Anomalies Under Copyright Law. 52 Southern California Law Review 635-663 (1979). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Rosen, Ronald S. Current Trends in Entertainment Litigation: The In- surance Empire Strikes Back 1 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 1, 3-5, 8 (Spring 1982).

Rothenberg, Stanley. Some New Problems in Motion Picture Copyright Law. 21 Bulletin of the Copyright Society 214-219 (1974).

Rubin, Edward. Copyright Law Revision and Motion Pictures. 3 Beverly Hills Bar Association Journal 6-13 (May 1969).

Smith, Eric H. Should the Motion Picture Industry Support or Oppose U.S. Adherence to the Berne Convention? 6 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 1, 10-20 (Fall 1987).

Stein, Marc R. Motion Picture Exhibitions Without a License: Alchemy in the Second Circuit? 1 COMM/ENT, A Journal of Communica- tions and Entertainment Law 277-309 (1978).

Stewart v. Abend: Derivative Copyright Works: Do They Have a Life of Their Own? 22 UCLA Law Review 221-253 (1991).

Stewart v. Abend: Derivative Work Users Beware. 68 Denver University Law Review 297-314 (1991).

The SubstantialSimilarity Test. 15 Golden Gate University Law Review 234-239 (1985).

Sussman, Jerome J. Copyright Publication,the Motion PictureDistributor and the Copyright Revision Bill. 15 Bulletin of the Copyright Soci- ety 373-382 (1968).

Technological Alterations to Motion Pictures and Other Audiovisual Works: Implications for Creators, Copyright Owners, and Com- sumers. 10 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 1-128 (1989).

Report of The Register of Copyrights, United States Copyright Office, March 1989.

A Trade-Based Response to Intellectual Property Piracy: A Comprehen- sive Plan to Aid the Motion Picture Industry. 76 Georgetown Law Journal 417-465 (1987).

Underlying Copyright Renewal and Derivative Works: Abend v. MCA, Inc. 58 University of Cincinnati Law Review 1069-1095 (1990). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Video Rentals and the First Sale Doctrine: The Deficiency of Proposed Legislation. 8 Whittier Law Review 331-352 (1986).

Ziniewicz, John. The Casefor Film Piracy. 81 Case and Comment 12-18 (Nov./Dec. 1976).

2. CharacterRights

Adams, Paul E. Superman, Mickey Mouse and Gerontology. 64 Trade- mark Reporter 183-192 (1974).

Berman, Bayard F. and Joel E. Boxer. Copyright Infringement ofAudio- visual Works and Characters. 52 Southern California Law Review 315-332 (1979).

Brylawski, E. Fulton. E. T: An ExtraterrestrialCaught in a Copyright Dilemma. 52 George Washington Law Review 395-407 (1984).

Brylawski, E. Fulton. Protectionof Characters-SamSpade Revisited. 22 Bulletin of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 77-103 (1974-1975).

Davidow, Lawrence L. Copyright Protectionfor Fictional Characters: A Trademark-BasedApproach to Replace Nichols. 8 Art & the Law 513-571 (1984).

Davis, Richard F. Sequel Rights: Federal Copyright Protection of Fic-, tional Characters. 2 Performing Arts Review 315-345 (1971).

Gentin, Adele L. A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: The Basis for Copyrightability of Charactersin Public Domain Works. 12 Colum- bia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 73-101 (1987).

Kellman, Leon. The Legal Protection of FictionalCharacters. 25 Brook- lyn Law Review 3-19 (1958).

Marks, Michael V. P. Legal Rights of Fictional Characters. 25 Copy- right Law Symposium 35-92 (1980).

Murphy, Rachel D. Tarzoon v. Tarzan: A New Look at the Legal Status of Parody. 5 Art & the Law 14-18 (1979).

Nolan, Peter F. The Licensing of Characters. 15 American Legal Insti- tute-American Bar Association Course Materials 7-22 (Dec. 1990). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

The ProtectionAfforded Literary and Cartoon CharactersThrough Trade- mark, Unfair Competition, and Copyright. 68 Harvard Law Review 349-363 (1954).

Simensky, Melvin. Protection of CharacterRights. 3 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 1, 10-23 (Spring 1985).

Turner, James L. It's a Bird, It's a Plane or Is It Public Domain?: Analy- sis of Copyright Protection Afforded Fictional Characters. 22 South Texas Law Journal 341-353 (1981).

Walt Disney Co. v. Powell: Good News for the CharacterInfringer. 11 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 133-157 (1991).

3. Title Rights

Angel, Dennis. Legal Protectionfor Titles in the EntertainmentIndustry. 52 Southern California Law Review 279-314 (1979).

Anthony, Michelle and Richard Finkelstein. Protecting Against Unau- thorized Use of Song Titles As Motion Picture Titles. 82 Patent & Trademark Review 145-161 (1984).

Anthony, Michelle and Richard Finkelstein. ProtectionAgainst the Un- authorized Use of the Title of a Song as the Title of a Motion Picture: The Doctrine of Unfair Competition in California and Under the Lanham Act. 1 Entertainment Law Journal 6-17 (Nov. 1981). (Also published in 1 Journal of Copyright, Entertainment and Sports Law 49-65 (1982)).

Cleary, J. Michael. Film and Television Title Clearance Problems At Is- sue Is the Likelihood of Confusion. 13 Los Angeles Lawyer 15-19 (Apr. 1990).

Conant, Whitney H., Lisa E. Socransky, Cynthia B. Glasser, and Martha M. Early. Title Protection. 10 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 467-553 (1990).

A Famous Title Is Worth 1,000 Publicity Stunts: Does the Owner of the Motion Picture Copyright to 'The Amityville Horror' Own the Title? 10 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 715-736 (1990).

Mayer, Michael F. Motion Picture Title Searches. 4 Practical Lawyer 64-72 (Oct. 1958). HASTINGS CoMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

E. Protecting the Artistic and Personal Rights of Filmmakers (See Also "Colorization," "Right of Publicity," and "Screenwriters")

1. In General

Carmenaty, Rudolph. Terry Gilliam's Brazil: A Film Director's Quest for Artistic Integrity in a Moral Rights Vacuum. 14 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 91-122 (1989).

Congressional Limits on Technological Alterations to Film: The Public Interest and the Artists' MoralRight. 5 High Technology Law Jour- nal 129-156 (1990).

Dellaverson, John J. The Director'sRight of Final Cut-How FinalIs Fi- nal? 7 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 7-13 (June 1988).

Horowitz, David H. Film Creatorsand Producers Vis-A- Vis the New Me- dia: Reflections on the State of Authors' Rights in Audio Visual Works. 13 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 157-184 (1988).

Moral Rights-PracticalPerspectives. 14 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 25-74 (1989).

Schwartz, Eric J. The National Film Preservation Act of 1988: A Copy- right Case Study in the Legislative Process. 36 Journal of the Copy- right Society of the U.S.A. 138-159 (1989).

Silverberg, Herbert T. Authors' and Performers' Rights. 23 Law and Contemporary Problems 125-164 (1958).

Technological Alterations to Motion Pictures and Other Audiovisual Works: Implications for Creators, Copyright Owners, and Consum- ers. 10 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 1-128 (1989).

Report of The Register of Copyrights, United States Copyright Office, March 1989.

The Twilight Zone: Meanderings in the Area of Performers' Rights. 9 UCLA Law Review 819-861 (1962).

Verbit, Larry E. Moral Rights and Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act: Oasis or Illusion? 9 COMM/ENT, Hastings Journal of Communica- tions and Entertainment Law 383-421 (1987). 19911 BIBLIOGRAPHY

2. Screen Credit

Berman, Bayard F. and Sol Rosenthal. Screen Credit and the Law. 9 UCLA Law Review 156-189 (1962).

Davenport, Robert. Screen Credit in the Entertainment Industry. 10 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 129-161 (1990).

Frank, David E. The Value of Star Billing. 9 Los Angeles Lawyer 48-51 (Apr. 1986).

Giving the Devil Its Due: Actors' and Performers' Rights to Receive Attri- bution for Cinematic Roles. 4 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 299-336 (1985). 3. Management

Harris, Michael. The Personal Manager in the Entertainment Field: There Ought to Be a Law. 4 Beverly Hills Bar Association Journal 19-22 (Apr. 1970).

Jossen, Sanford. Fiduciary Aspects of the Personal Manager's Relation- ship with a Performing Artist. 11 Performing Arts Review 108-126 (1981).

Nimoy, Adam B. PersonalManagers and the California Talent Agencies Act: For Whom the Bill Toils. 2 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 145-164 (1982).

4. Compensation/PersonalTax Issues

Arrow, Allen H. Estate Planning Problems of Authors, Performers and Other Creative Persons. 9 Institute on Estate Planning 17.1-17.17 (1975).

Blanc, Ronald L. Current Income Tax Developments of Interest to the EntertainmentIndustry. 26 Southern California Tax Institute 1083- 1113 (1974).

Brawerman, Richard S. and Robert C. Kopple. Income Tax Planning for Composers, Entertainers and Others Performing Personal Serv- ices. 2 Performing Arts Review 557-585 (1971).

Cohen, Leonard. PersonalHolding Companies-EntertainmentIndustry. 14 Southern California Tax Institute 651-676 (1962). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. (V/ol. 14:137

Dyke, William D. What Do Airplanes, Railroad Cars, Beef Cattle, Mo- tion Pictures, Real Estate and Oil Wells All Have in Common? 48 Wisconsin Bar Bulletin 63-69 (June 1975).

Engel, Morris. Tax Shelters and the "Silver Screen." 5 Performing Arts Review 211-225 (1974).

Fass, Peter M. Motion Pictures as a Tax Shelter: A CurrentAnalysis of the Technique and the Problems. 40 Journal of Taxation 154-158 (1974).

Fass, Peter M. and Robert D. Howard. How to Use the Service Partner- ship to Enhance Motion Picture Tax Shelters. 43 Journal of Taxa- tion 15-20 (1975).

Gertz, Ronald H. and Gary D. Culpepper. Negotiating Sound Track Al- bum Agreements. 10 Los Angeles Lawyer 47-56 (May 1987).

Haims, Bruce D. Income Tax Planningfor Entertainers. 4 Communica- tions and the Law 33 (1982).

Halloran, Mark. Film Composing Agreements: Legal and Business Con- cerns. 5 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 1-59 (1985).

Net Profit Participationsin the Motion Picture Industry. 11 Loyola En- tertainment Law Journal 23-65 (1991).

Nochimson, David and Leon Brachman. Contingent Compensation for Theatrical Motion Pictures. 5 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 3- 6, 14-18 (Summer 1986).

Schaaf, David W. Estate Planningfor Entertainers. 4 Communications and the Law 45 (1982).

Sills, Steven D. and Ivan L. Axelrod. Profit Participationin the Motion PictureIndustry. 12 Los Angeles Lawyer 31-33, 54-57 (Apr. 1989).

F. Colorization

Allen, Peter. Copyrights and Color Wrongs: Are Old Films Protected? 7 California Lawyer 12 (Apr. 1987).

Allen, Woody, Milos Forman, Sydney Pollack, Ginger Rogers, and El- liot Silverstein. Colorization: The Arguments Against. 17 Journal of Arts Management & Law 79-93 (Fall 1987). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Artistic Integrity, Public Policy and Copyright: Colorization Reduced to Black and White. 50 Ohio State Law Journal 1013-1033 (1989).

Artists' Moral Rights and Film Colorization: FederalLegislative Efforts to Provide Visual Artists With Moral Rights and Resale Royalties. 38 Syracuse Law Review 965-990 (1987).

Beyer, Lawrence Adam. Intentionalism, Art, and the Suppression of In- novation: Film Colorization and the Philosophy of Moral Rights. 82 Northwestern University Law Review 1011-1112 (1988).

Black and White (And Red All Over): "Colorization" in the Courts and in the Government. 10 Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 59-76 (1989).

Color It Copyrighted: Protectionfor Colorized Motion Pictures. 8 Journal of Law and Commerce 397-422 (1988).

The Colorization Dispute: Moral Rights Theory as a Means of Judicial and Legislative Reform. 38 Emory Law Journal 237-277 (1989).

The Colorization of Black and White Films: An Example of the Lack of Substantive Protectionfor Art in the United States. 63 Notre Dame Law Review 309-332 (1988).

Colorization of Films: Painting a Moustache on the "Mona Lisa?" 58 University of Cincinnati Law Review 1023-1041 (1990).

Colorization of Motion Pictures: Another View. 5 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 3-6, 23-24 (Winter 1987).

Colorization: Removing the Green. 6 University of Miami Entertainment & Sports Law Review 87-108 (1989).

Congressional Limits on Technological Alterations to Film: The Public Interest and the Artists' Moral Right. 5 High Technology Law Jour- nal 129-156 (1990).

Duggan, James Thomas and Neil V. Pennella. The Case for Copyrights in "Colorized" Versions of Public Domain FeatureFilms. 34 Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 333-379 (1987).

Film Artists Bushwhacked by the Coloroids: One-Hundredth Congress to the Rescue? 22 Akron Law Review 359-380 (1989). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

A Film of a Different Color: Copyright and the Colorization of Black and White Films. 5 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 497- 543 (1986).

Gendreau, Ysolde. Colourizing Movies-Some International,Ramifica- tions. 5 Intellectual Property Journal 297-322 (1990).

Ginsburg, Jane C. Colors in Conflicts: Moral Rights and the Foreign Ex- ploitation of Colorized U.S. Motion Pictures. 36 Journal of the Copy- right Society of the U.S.A. 81-100 (1988).

Greenstone, Richard J. A Coat of Paint on the Past? Impediments to Distribution of Colorized Black and White Motion Pictures. 5 En- tertainment and Sports Lawyer 1, 13-24 (Fall 1986).

Kohs, David J. Paint Your Wagon-Pleasel: Colorization, Copyright, and the Search for Moral Rights. .40 Federal Communications Law Journal 1-38 (1990).

Kohs, David J. When Art and Commerce Collide: Colorization and the Moral Right. 18 Journal of Arts Management & Law 13-43 (Spring 1988).

Landau, Michael B. The Colorization of Black-and-White Motion Pic- tures: A Grey Area in the Law. 22 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Re- view 1161-1187 (1989). (Also published in 19 Journal of Arts Management & Law 61-87 (Fall 1989)).

Landau, Michael. Colourization, Copyright and Moral Rights: A U.S. Perspective. 5 Intellectual Property Journal 215-255 (1990).

Mayer, Roger L., Rob Word, and Buddy Young. Colorization: The Ar- guments for. 17 Journal of Arts Management & Law 64-78 (Fall 1987).

Meade, Jeffrey. Moral Rights in Intellectual Property and the 'Film Colourization' Debate: An Applied Study. 4 Intellectual Property Journal 63-86 (1989).

Moral Right Protections in the Colorization of Black and White Motion Pictures: A Black and White Issue. 16 Hofstra Law Review 503-543 (1988).

Motion Picture Colorization, Authenticity, and the Elusive Moral Right. 64 New York University Law Review 628-725 (1989). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Renberg, Dan. The Money of Color: Film Colorization and the 100th Congress. 11 Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal (COMM/ENT) 391-422 (1989).

Schiller, Suzanne Ilene. Black and White and Brilliant: Protecting Black-and-White Films from Color-Recoding. 9 COMM/ENT, Has- tings Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 523-543 (1987).

G. Screenwriters

Cohen, Jonathan D. Remedies for Misappropriation of Motion Picture and Television Story Ideas. 7 COMM/ENT, Hastings Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 85-110 (1984).

Larner, Andrew S. The Writers Guild of America Strike of 1988: A Question of Respect. 14 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 75-89 (1989).

Rosten, Keith A. Legal Control of the Soviet Cinema: The Scenario Writer' Contract. 14 Rutgers Law Journal 115-133 (1982).

Ryan, Kerry. Using the Uniform Commercial Code to Protect the "Ideas" that Make the Movies. 27 Santa Clara Law Review 693-714 (1987).

Schaefer, Susan G. Representing Television Writers: How to Negotiate a Movie-For-Television ScriptwritingDeal. 11 Los Angeles Lawyer 39- 47 (May 1988).

H. Right of Publicity (See Also "Docudramas")

Adams, Ben C. Inheritabilityof the Right of Publicity Upon the Death of the Famous. 3 Vanderbilt Law Review 1251-1264 (1980).

Appropriationof Personality-A New Tort? 99 Law Quarterly Review 281- 313 (1983).

Choice of Law in Right of Publicity. 31 UCLA Law Review 640-670 (1984).

Coleman, Allison. The Unauthorised Commercial Exploitation of the Names and Likenesses of Real Persons (A Comparison of British and HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

American Law). 4 European Intellectual Property Review 189 (1982).

Descendability of the Right of Publicity. 1983 Southern Illinois Univer- sity Law Journal 547-565.

The First Amendment v. Right of Publicity in Theatrical Imitations: A Delicate Balance. 57 Notre Dame Lawyer 658-672 (1982).

Heneghan, Patrick J. and Herbert C. Wamsley. The Service Mark Alter- native to the Right of Publicity: Estate of Presley v. Russen. 14 Pa- cific Law Journal 181-207 (1983).

Hoffman, Richard B. The Right of Publicity-Heirs' Rights, Advertisers' Windfall, or Courts' Nightmare. 31 DePaul Law Review 1-44 (1981).

Horowitz, Gary. An Analysis of the Right of Publicity. 6 Art & the Law 39-43 (1981).

Manson, Deborah. The Television Docudrama and the Right of Publicity. 7 Communications and the Law 41-61 (Feb. 1985).

Marks, Kevin S. An Assessment of the Copyright Model in Right of Pub- licity Cases. 70 California Law Review 786-815 (1982).

The Right of Publicity As a Means of Protecting Performers' Style. 14 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 129-163 (1980).

The Right of Publicity: PrematureBurial for California Property Rights in the Wake of Lugosi. 12 Pacific Law Journal 987-1011 (1981).

Rogers, Kipp. The Right of Publicity: Resurgence of Legal Formalism and JudicialDisregard of Policy Issues. 16 Beverly Hills Bar Associ- ation Journal 65-83 (1982).

Rooney v. Columbia Pictures: A Performer's Right of Publicity with a Touch of Class. 3 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 201- 225 (1984). 19911 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Samuelson, Pamela. Reviving Zacchini: Analyzing FirstAmendment De- fenses in Right of Publicity and Copyright Cases. 57 Tulane Law Review 836-929 (1983).

Schneiderman, Jan R. The Descendibility of the Right of Publicity: An Analysis. 12 Journal of Arts Management and Law 49-75 (Winter 1983).

Shipley, David E. PublicityNever Dies, It Just Fades Away. The Right of Publicity and Federal Preemption. 66 Cornell Law Review 673-737 (1981).

Simensky, Melvin and Thomas Selz. Descendibility of the Right of Pub- licity. 1 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 1, 9-15 (Spring 1983).

Sims, Andrew B. Right of Publicity: Survivability Reconsidered. 49 Fordham Law Review 453-499 (1981).

A Survey of the Right of Publicity: An Overview. 1 Entertainment Law Journal 165-176 (1981).

I. Docudramas

BillionaireBoys' Club: Billionaires by Crime? 10 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 573-594 (1990).

A Curtain Call for Docudrama-DefamationActions: A Clear Standard Takes a Bow. 8 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 113-126 (1988).

Gerdes, Ted F. No Shortcuts in the Clearance Process. 13 Los Angeles Lawyer 32-37, 56-59 (Apr. 1990).

Hansen, Joan. Docudrama-Invented Dialogue, Impersonation and Con- cocted Scenes: Beware of Lurking Lawsuits. 5 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 1, 14-24 (Spring 1987).

The Legal Effect of Disclaimersof Liability on Motion Pictures Based on Fact. 9 Glendale Law Review 74-91 (1990).

Manson, Deborah. The Television Docudramaand the Right of Publicity. 7 Communications and the Law 41-61 (Feb. 1985).

McGarry, Eileen. Trial by TV. 8 California Lawyer 30-35 (May 1988). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

My Life, My Story, Right? Fashioning Life Story Rights in the Motion PictureIndustry. 12 Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal (CoMM/ENT) 627-664 (1990).

Pilgrim, Tim A. Docudramas and False-Light Invasion of Privacy. 10 Communications and the Law 3-37 (June 1988).

Rohde, Stephen F. Television Docudramas: Fact or Fiction? 4 En- tertainment and Sports Lawyer 3-5 (Summer 1985).

Sobel, Lionel S. The Trials and Tribulations of ProducingDocu-Dramas: Tales of Elizabeth Taylor, John DeLorean and Network Program Standards. 5 Entertainment Law Reporter 3 (Aug. 1983.)

Television Docudramas and the Right of Publicity: Too Bad Liz, That's Show Biz. 8 COMM/ENT, Hastings Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 257-287 (1986).

Television Docudramas: Is the Titillation Worth the Risk? 20 Rutgers Law Journal 461-478 (1989).

Towards a Right of Biography: Controlling Commercial Exploitation of PersonalHistory. 2 COMM/ENT, A Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 489-544 (1980).

Trial by Docudrama: Fact or Fiction? 9 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 201-230 (1990).

Williams, John Taylor and John A. Frascotti. The Lawyer's Role in the Acquisition and Exploitation of Life Story Rights. 31 Boston Bar Journal 9-13 (July/Aug. 1987).

J. Music and Motion Pictures

Anthony, Michelle and Richard Finkelstein. Protection Against the Un- authorized Use of the Title of a Song as the Title of a Motion Picture: The Doctrine of Unfair Competition in California and Under the Lanham Act. 1 Entertainment Law Journal 6-17 (Nov. 1981). (Also published in 1 Journal of Copyright, Entertainment and Sports Law 49-65 (1982)).

Brylawski, E. Fulton. Copyrightability of Motion PictureSound Tracks. 18 Bulletin of the Copyright Society 357-370 (1971). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Colby, Richard. Music in Motion Pictures. 30 Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 34-37 (1982).

Gertz, Ronald H. and Gary D. Culpepper. Negotiating Sound Track Al- bum Agreements. 10 Los Angeles Lawyer 47-56 (May 1987).

Halloran, Mark. Film Composing Agreements: Legal and Business Con- cerns. 5 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 1-59 (1985).

Halloran, Mark and Thomas A. White. Pop Soundtrack Musicfor Film. 7 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 1-2, 18-28 (Winter 1989).

Havlicek, Franklin J. and J. Clark Kelso. The Rights of Composers and Lyricists: Before and After Bernstein. 8 Art & the Law 439-456 (1984).

Oman, Ralph. Source Licensing: The Latest Skirmish in an Old Battle. 11 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 251-281 (1987).

Sobel, Lionel S. The Legal and Business Aspects of Motion Picture and Television Soundtrack Music. 8 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 231-258 (1988).

Sustak, Ken. The Great Motion PictureSoundtrack Robbery. 22 Bulletin of the Copyright Society 315-416 (1975).

The Synchronization Right. Business Practices and Legal Realities. 7 Cardozo Law Review 787-815 (1986).

Yuzek, Dean G. Publication and Protection: In Qualified Support of the Copyright Office Approach to Motion PictureSoundtracks. 22 Bulle- tin of the Copyright Society 19-44 (1974).

K. Taxation

Admissions Tax on Movie Theaters Infringes Freedom of Speech: A Novel Argument That Has Worked... So Far. 10 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 555-572 (1990).

Allred, W. Dennis. "At-Risk" Revisited: A Re-Examination of the Im- pact of the Tax Reform Act of 1976 on the Motion PictureIndustry. 2 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 165-173 (1982). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Appel, Martin S. Motion Picture Service Company: A Service to the Mo- tion PictureIndustry? 27 Southern California Tax Institute 559-600 (1975).

Bacal, Norman. Not Just Another Sequel The CanadianMotion Picture Industry After Tax Reform. 36 Canadian Tax Journal 537-577 (1988).

Bennett, Raymond T. and Buton N. Forester. The Investment Tax Credit for Motion Picture and Television Films and Tapes-The Unique and New Rules Under the Tax Reform Act of 1976. 31 Southern California Tax Institute 295-419 (1979).

Beskin, Jay R., Douglas A. Hanson, and John A. Nelson. Taxation: Substance v. Form and Other Esoterica. 62 Chicago-Kent Law Re- view 657-685 (1986).

Biblin, Allan E. New Law Offers Several Optionsfor Obtaining the Tax Benefits of Motion Picture Films. 56 Journal of Taxation 88-92 (1982).

Carnegie Productions, Inc. v. Commissioner. 31 Tax Law Review 99- 112 (1975).

Chatzky, Michael G. Avarua, Rarotonga- Will It Become the New Mo- tion Picture Capital of the World for InternationalTax Planners? 7 Common Law Lawyer 1-5 (Nov.-Dec. 1982).

The Effect of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 on Motion Picture Financing. 12 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 307-331 (1988).

Engel, Morris. Tax Shelters and the "Silver Screen." 5 Performing Arts Review 211-225 (1974).

Fass, Peter M. Motion Pictures as a Tax Shelter: A Current Analysis of the Technique and the Problems. 40 Journal of Taxation 154-158 (1974).

Fass, Peter M. and Robert D. Howard. How to Use the Service Partner- ship to Enhance Motion Picture Tax Shelters. 43 Journal of Taxa- tion 15-20 (1975).

Fass, Peter M. and Robert D. Howard. Motion Picture Investments Ad- versely Affected by TRA but Opportunities Remain. 46 Journal of Taxation 140-145 (1977). 1991l BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hardacre, David W. T V and Motion PictureProduction Personnel May Incorporateto Save Taxes: The BrauerPatch Untangled. 15 Beverly Hills Bar Association Journal 458-464 (1981).

Hendler, Gary J. and Herbert A. Lyman. Selected Current Tax Problems of the Independent Motion Picture Production Company. 25 Southern California Tax Institute 315-332 (1973).

Keesling, Frank M. and Alex M. Brucker. California Taxation of Liter- ary Properties. 2 COMM/ENT, A Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 263-286 (1979-80).

Malony, David M. and David B. Barr. Tax Treatment of Videocassettes: An Unresolved Dilemma in a Booming Business. 17 The Tax Ad- viser 289-293 (1986).

Miller, Robert J. Complying with New Record Keeping for the Investment Tax Credit on Motion Picture Films. 52 Journal of Taxation 13-15 (1980).

Miller, Robert J. and Richard H. Nimmons. Intangibles: Investment Credit and Amortization-Disney Case. 26 Southern California Tax Institute 1115-1137 (1974).

Mirsky, Burton M. ERTA and the Movies. 13 Tax Adviser 231 (1982).

Mirsky, Burton M. Investment Tax Credit on Films: TEFRA Rules. 14 Tax Adviser 224 (1983).

Motion Picture Tax Shelters: Are the Funds at Risk? 28 American Uni- versity Law Review 177-206 (1979).

Norris, Rick E. Does the Cessation of Movie Revenue Trigger the Recap- ture of Investment Credit? 64 Taxes 44-50 (Jan. 1986).

Satty, Irving A. Motion Picture Tax Shelters-A New Approach. 55 Taxes 66-75 (1977).

Singer, Stuart R. New Developments in Taxation of Foreign Entertainers and Employees. 51 Los Angeles Bar Journal 388-393 (1976).

Tax Law: Sense and Sensibility in Film and Sound Recording Deprecia- tion, 1984-1986 Legislative Developments. 6 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 243-263 (1986). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

The Tax Reform Act of 1976 and Tax Incentives for Motion Picture In- vestment: Throwing out the Baby with the Bath Water. 58 Southern California Law Review 839-869 (1985).

Towne, Raymond L. Out from Safe Harbor: The Odyssey of the Motion Picture Producer's "Special Employee." 8 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 275-296 (1988).

Veenhuis, Eugene H. Selected California Tax Problems of the Entertain- ment Industry. 28 Southern California Tax Institute 853-874 (1976).

Veenhuis, Eugene H. Tax Disadvantages of Profit Participations-Can They Be Avoided? 8 Beverly Hills Bar Association Journal 36-40 (May-June 1974).

Wiesner, Philip J. Tax Shelters-A Survey of the Impact of the Tax Re- form Act of 1976. 33 Tax Law Review 5-113 (1977).

Williams, Harley. The Investment Tax Credit in Connection with Record Masters and Motion Pictures-The Only Game in Town. 52 Southern California Law Review 1121-1159 (1979).

Wise, Richard M. New Rules for Motion Picture Tax Shelters. 27 Cana- dian Tax Journal 245-255 (1979).

Zitzerman, David B. and Ernst. Film, TV, and the GST-Commercial EntertainmentAgreements and the Goods and Services Tax. 1 Me- dia and Communications Law Review 3- (1991).

L. Foreign and International Aspects of Filmmaking

Acheson, Keith and Christopher Maule. Trade Policy Responses to New Technology in the Film and Television Industry. 23 Journal of World Trade 35-48 (Apr. 1989).

Bacal, Norman. Not Just Another Sequel: The Canadian Motion Picture Industry After Tax Reform. 36 Canadian Tax Journal 547-577 (1988).

Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Wick: Striking Down Government Regulations Regarding the Export of US. Movies. 19 Golden Gate University Law Review 37-45 (1989). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Cryan, Thomas Joseph, David W. Johnson, James S. Crane, and Anthony Cammarata. Strategies for the International Production and Distributionof Feature Film in the 1990's. 8 Loyola Entertain- ment Law Journal 1-24 (1990).

Ginsburg, Jane C. Colors in Conflicts: Moral Rights and the Foreign Ex- ploitation of Colorized U.S. Motion Pictures. 36 Journal of the Copy- right Society of the U.S.A. 81-100 (1988).

Levine, Michael A. and David B. Zitzerman. Foreign Productions and Foreign Financing: The CanadianPerspective. 5 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 6-10, 27-31 (Spring 1987).

Marshall, William T. Investing in Australia'sFilm Future. 58 Law Insti- tute Journal 1048-1053 (1984).

Olswang, Simon M. The Last Emperor and Co-Producingin China: The Impossible Made Easy, and the Easy Made Impossible. 6 Entertain- ment and Sports Lawyer 3-4, 9 (Fall 1987).

Pendleton, Michael D. China's First Court Decision on Copyright: Jiang v. Qiao and the Film 'Hospital Ward No. 16.' 12 European Intellec- tual Property Review 217-219 (1990).

Silenced Screens: The Role of the United States Information Agency in Denying Export Certificates to American Films. 17 New York Uni- versity Journal of International Law and Politics 77-111 (1984).

Taska, Ilmar. Film and Television Co-Productions with the USSR. 11 Whittier Law Review 401-405 (1989).

A Trade-Based Response to Intellectual Property Piracy: A Comprehen- sive Plan to Aid the Motion Picture Industry. 76 Georgetown Law Journal 417-465 (1987).

Two Courts Void USIA Documentary Regs; Agency Denials of Film Ex- port Certificates Labeled 'Censorship' by Appeals Court. 12 News Media & the Law 23-24 (Summer 1988). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

USIA Censorship of Education Filmsfor DistributionAbroad. 3 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 403-425 (1984).

Winter, Richard A. Film and Television Production and Distribution in Canada: Recent Developments. 22 Beverly Hills Bar Association Journal 123-143 (1988).

Zitzerman, David B. and Michael A. Levine. Producinga Film in Can- ada-The Legal and Regulatory Framework 8 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 15-28 (Winter 1991).

M. Video Recording and Piracy

Beard, Joseph J. The Sale, Rental, and Reproduction of Motion Picture Videocassettes: Piracy or Privilege? 15 New England Law Review 435-484 (1979-1980).

Chase, Carol A. Video Piracy; Federal Criminal Copyright Penalties. 9 Los Angeles Lawyer 10-13 (Apr. 1986).

Cheaper by the Dozen: UnauthorizedRental of Motion Picture Videocas- settes and Videodiscs. 34 Federal Communications Law Journal 259-289 (1982).

Couch Potatoes Beware: The Ninth Circuit's Exclusion of Videocassette Exhibition Rights from Licenses Granting Television Exhibition Rights May Decrease the Availability of Rentable Films. 9 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 117-136 (1989).

"Disk-Television ":Some Recurring Copyright Problems in the Reproduc- tion and Performance of Motion Pictures. 34 University of Chicago Law Review 686-703 (1967). (Also published in 16 Copyright Law Symposium, 143-169 (1966)).

Gormley, Laurence W. The Rule of Reason and Culture. 10 European Law Review 440-445 (1985).

Green, Bruce M. The Empire Strikes Back: Criminal Remedies for Video Piracy. 1 Intellectual Property Journal 1-28 (1986).

Intention Permanently to Deprive-Theft Act 1968, Section 6(1) - Conspir- acy to Steal Feature Films-Pirate Videotapes. 1985 Criminal Law Review 518-520 (1985). 1991] BIBLIOGRAPHY

Iselin, Harold. Home Video Licensing Agreements. 8 Art & the Law 29- 41 (1983).

Kane-Ritsch, Julie. The Videotape Rental Controversy: Copyright In- fringement or Market Necessity. 18 John Marshall Law Review 285- 320 (1985).

Lane, Shelley. Borrowing Filmsfor Copying-Not Theft. 1985 Journal of Business Law 416-418.

Lewson, Nancy B. The Videocassette Rental Controversy: The Future State of the Law. 30 Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 1-33 (1983).

Maatta, John D. and Lorin Brennan. Comments on International Video Piracy-A Review of the Problem and Some Potential Solutions. 10 CoMM/ENT, Hastings Journal of Communications and Entertain- ment Law 1081-1087 (1988).

Malony, David M. and David B. Barr. Tax Treatment of Videocassettes: An Unresolved Dilemma in a Booming Business. 17 The Tax Ad- viser 289-293 (1986).

MissouriStatute Attacks 'Violent' Videos: Are First Amendment Rights in Danger? 10 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 655-678 (1990).

Ogan, Christine L. Developing Policy for EliminatingInternational Video Piracy. 32 Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 163-182 (1988).

Painter, Michael A. ProprietaryRights in Video Tape. 7 Beverley Hills Bar Association Journal 24-32 (May-June 1973).

Video Rentals and the First Sale Doctrine: The Deficiency of Proposed Legislation. 8 Whittier Law Review 331-352 (1986).

What Films We May Watch: Videotape Distribution and the First Amendment. 136 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1263- 1300 (1988).

N. Miscellaneous

Chase, Anthony. Avant-Garde, Kitsch and Law. 14 Nova Law Review 549-571 (1990). HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 14:137

Diamond, John L. and James L. Primm. Rediscovering Traditional Tort Typologies to Determine Media Liabilityfor Physical Injuries: From the Mickey Mouse Club to Hustler Magazine. 10 CoMM/ENT, Has- tings Journal of Communications and Entertainment Law 969-997 (1988). Gershman, Bennett L. The Thin Blue Line: Art or Trial in the Factfind- ing Process? 9 Pace Law Review 275-317 (1989). Gong Hancock, Marguerite. The Nexus of Culture and Politics: A Study of Film in US.-China Relations. 9 Fletcher Forum 325-351 (1985). Harrison, Jeffrey L. and Amy R. Mashburn. Jean-Luc Godardand Criti- cal Legal Studies (Because We Need the Eggs). 87 Michigan Law Review 1924-1944 (1989). Herd, Denise. Ideology, Melodrama, and the Changing Role of Alcohol Problems in American Films. 13 Contemporary Drug Problems 213-247 (1986). Libel in Fiction: The Sylvia Plath Case and Its Aftermath. 11 Columbia- VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 473-503 (1987). Weiss, Elaine. Who's Missing in This Picture? Why Movies and Televi- sion Have Ignored Women Lawyers. 16 Barrister 4-7, 30-32 (Winter 1989-1990).