Lesson 2. Epigraphy, Daniel Flaut.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lesson 2. Epigraphy, Daniel Flaut.Pdf Lesson 2. Epigraphy Learning tasks: by completing this unit of study, the student will be able to: ¾ Define Epigraphy and to highlight the key moments in its evolution as science. ¾ Retain some elementary notions of Epigraphy: writing materials, writing techniques and writing tools; the evolution of the epigraphic writing; the branches of Epigraphy; the dating and the editing of the inscriptions. ¾ Reveal the importance of Epigraphy. I. Definition; The evolution of Epigraphy as science Epigraphy (from Greek ἐπιγραφή, epi­graphē = inscription) is the Auxiliary Science of History that deals with the interpretation and deciphering of the inscriptions in hard materials such as stone, metal (plumb, bronze, silver, gold), pearl, ivory, ceramic, wood, bricks, skin, glass, etc. Willhelm Larfeld has defined Epigraphy as "science of the literary monuments". Epigraphy not studying coins, medals and seals. With their study deals other Auxiliary Sciences of History (Numismatics, Phaleristics and Sigillography). The History of Epigraphy is very old. Herodotus of Halicarnassus (c.484–c.420 BC) used the temple inscriptions as historical sources for the realization of his work. After Herodotus, the attention given to Epigraphy was accentuated by the concerns of the Latin and Byzantines historians. In the Middle Ages, concerns in the field of Epigraphy were continued. In the 16th century, Conrad Peutinger (1465‐1547) and Martin Smet was preoccupied by inscriptions. Although they do not have exceeded the recognition phase, they are regarded as the parents of Epigraphy. Significant contributions to the advancement of Epigraphy was brought by Scipione Maffei (1675‐1755). In book 3 of the Ars critique lapidaria, he tried to extract some elements, realizing the first critical of the inscriptions published until him. As science, Epigraphy was formed only in the early 19th century, when are realized the major collections of ancient inscriptions (Greek and Latin). The founder of this science is August Boeckh (1785‐1867), who established the principles and emphasized the importance of Epigraphy. In 1827, he published a circular Corporis Inscriptionum graecarum, Notitia sumptibus Academiae Borussica edendi, in which defines the characters of Epigraphy. A year later, August Boeckh has developed its concerns in the first volume of Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum (CIG); the following volumes appeared in 1843, 1853 and 1856, and the index in 1877. His work includes a total of 9926 inscriptions. In 1863, under the aegis of the Academy of Berlin (as CIG), began publication of a very valuable epigraphic instrument, called Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum Daniel Flaut, Introduction to the Auxiliary Sciences of History (CIL). To achieve it, a great contribution brought Theodor Mommsen (1817‐ 1903), in fact the initiator of this great work of Epigraphy. These two large corpora of inscriptions (CIG and CIL) have provided information material for the theoretical debate. Completion of science takes place much later by the famous work of Salomon Reinach (Traité d’épigraphie grecques, Paris, 1885), Wilhelm Larfeld (Handbuch der griechischen Epigraphik, 2 vol., München, 1902‐1907; Griechischen Epigraphic, München, 1914) and Rene Cagnat (Cours d’épigraphie latine, ed. 4, Paris, 1914). Thus, was established the general methodological principles. In the interwar period and after 1945, the researches of Epigraphy was widened considerably both by the publication of new inscriptions provided by the archaeological discoveries as well by the elaborating studies of Epigraphy theory. Over the years, the specialists participated at the international congresses of Epigraphy, which were held in Paris, Vienna, München, Cambridge, etc. and where they discussed various issues of the theory and the methodology of Epigraphy. A prestigious international publication, which mediates the discussion of many issues raised by the epigraphic studies today, is appearing in Paris (L' Année épigraphique). II. Elementary notions of Epigraphy a) Writing materials, writing techniques and writing tools The material of the inscriptions is very varied. The oldest inscriptions were carved in wood, usually waxed wood, for a greater durability ‐ this was, for example, Solon's laws ‐ then in stone and, most common, in marble. Also, was carved, both in Antiquity and the Middle Ages, in brick, ceramic, masonry, etc. The written material was processed by special techniques, depending on its destination, in several phases. In the first phase, the monument was worked by various techniques: carving, modeling, casting, etc., being realized the shapes and marked the surfaces of the inscription that follow to be made. Previously, the text was written, sized and distributed according to the size of the monument project. After the lines were drawn and the letters were designed, the inscription was made, by various techniques, depending on the material used: carved or embossed (for stone), painting, sculpting (for wood), etc. As writing tools were used: chisel, paintbrush, knife, etc. b) Epigraphic writing and its evolution At first, Greeks and Romans have written the text of the inscription from the right to the left. Thereafter, it was written alternately, a line from the right to the left and the next line from the left to the right (boustrophedon). This system was used in many inscriptions (Northern writing, Italic writing, etc). There were several modalities to place the letters in writing. Studying old grammars, we find the existence of three models. The oldest of them is columnar. In this system, the letters of a word was placed one under another. For columns to be not too long and so hard to read, the inscription field was divided into limited areas with a free space. The second system was the brick­shaped. In this system, the lines of the text were placed in the shape of parallelepiped. The third system was the basket­shaped. In this system, the lines of the text are successively shortened. There are also inscriptions square, triangular, pyramid­shaped. Whatever the utilized system, there is the rule that each letter of the next line must to be placed 2 Daniel Flaut, Introduction to the Auxiliary Sciences of History under another letter of the previous line. This recommendation was rarely respected because not all letters have the same surface area. Although for the most part it is scriptura lapidaria, reading of inscriptions is not easy due to technical difficulties. Ligaturing are extremely varied. Words are not always written in full. Sometimes is used sigla (initial letter), is write only the initial letter of the word (for example: IOM = iovi optimo maximo). Sometimes, is used the abbreviation. It is achieved by writing of two or more letters at the beginning of the word (for example: PR = praetor, LG = legio, PVB = publicus). But there are exceptions, many abbreviations are used for the same word (for example: V, VIX or VT = vixit) or is used the contraction (for example: MCP = municipiu). The historian must to know the relevant rules and the exceptions for every Epigraphy. To facilitate the correct reading of the inscriptions, in Epigraphy are used and accents. In Latin Epigraphy has been used acute accent put on long vowels. From third century, acute accent was used only exceptionally. It has also been used circumflex accent. This accent is put on a letter to show that it is doubled (for example: O S A = OSSA) and later will show a greater abbreviation (for example: PR = pater; NR = noster). In Greek Epigraphy have been used several types of accents: acute, grave and circumflex. In Epigraphy were also used ellipses. Sometimes there is a tendency to separate the words by signs of various shapes: round, square, triangular, oblong, leaves, etc. Then, the stonecutters lost the meaning of these signs, they believed were ornaments. Therefore, the stonecutters have placed the signs everywhere: between words, between syllables and even between letters. c) The branches of Epigraphy Epigraphy includes three main branches, in according to the alphabets and the historical eras in which they were made different epigraphic texts: Greek Epigraphy (inscriptions with the Greek alphabet and in Greek language, in Antiquity); Latin Epigraphy (inscriptions with the Latin alphabet and in Latin language, found in the whole Roman world) and Medieval Epigraphy. Medieval Epigraphy use different alphabets (Greek, Latin, Cyrillic, Armenian, Arabic, Turkish, etc.) and languages. The Medieval inscriptions belong both Medieval Epigraphy and as well respective writings: Medieval Latin, Neo Greek, Old Slavic, Slavic‐Romanian, Romanian‐Cyrillic, etc., which were not separated completely. There are two main direction of analysis of the Ancient and the Medieval inscriptions, which is made by each of the branches of Epigraphy: the form and the content. The analysis of the form of the epigraphic monument refers to: dimensions, the material it is made, techniques and tools used to achieve the epigraphic monument, deciphering the text, deciphering of possible representations from the epigraphic monument. All these details is required to realize a complete study on that epigraphic monument. In the next phase ‐ not separated from the first phase ‐ are studied the content elements of the epigraphic monument. These elements include: the interpretation of figurative scenes which it contains by the epigraphic monument, completion and interpretation of the epigraphic text, translation and comment of the epigraphic text, framing of the historical
Recommended publications
  • 0. Introduction L2/12-386
    Doc Type: Working Group Document Title: Revised Proposal to Encode Additional Old Italic Characters Source: UC Berkeley Script Encoding Initiative (Universal Scripts Project) Author: Christopher C. Little ([email protected]) Status: Liaison Contribution Action: For consideration by JTC1/SC2/WG2 and UTC Replaces: N4046 (L2/11-146R) Date: 2012-11-06 0. Introduction The existing Old Italic character repertoire includes 31 letters and 4 numerals. The Unicode Standard, following the recommendations in the proposal L2/00-140, states that Old Italic is to be used for the encoding of Etruscan, Faliscan, Oscan, Umbrian, North Picene, and South Picene. It also specifically states that Old Italic characters are inappropriate for encoding the languages of ancient Italy north of Etruria (Venetic, Raetic, Lepontic, and Gallic). It is true that the inscriptions of languages north of Etruria exhibit a number of common features, but those features are often exhibited by the other scripts of Italy. Only one of these northern languages, Raetic, requires the addition of any additional characters in order to be fully supported by the Old Italic block. Accordingly, following the addition of this one character, the Unicode Standard should be amended to recommend the encoding of Venetic, Raetic, Lepontic, and Gallic using Old Italic characters. In addition, one additional character is necessary to encode South Picene inscriptions. This proposal is divided into five parts: The first part (§1) identifies the two unencoded characters (Raetic Ɯ and South Picene Ũ) and demonstrates their use in inscriptions. The second part (§2) examines the use of each Old Italic character, as it appears in Etruscan, Faliscan, Oscan, Umbrian, South Picene, Venetic, Raetic, Lepontic, Gallic, and archaic Latin, to demonstrate the unifiability of the northern Italic languages' scripts with Old Italic.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking in ⅃TЯ
    Nathan P. Gibson • University of Munich (LMU) • usaybia.net Thinking in ⅃TЯ Reorienting the Directional Assumptions of Global Digital Scholarship https://tinyurl.com/gibson190608 Right2Left Workshop #DHSI19RTL Victoria, 8 June 2019 This presentation is licensed under a CC-BY 4.0 International License. Images may be subject to individual licenses (see captions). Outline Forward from Failures The State of Standards A Dizzying Tour of Directionality (Present Meets Future) (Past Meets Present) (The Past) Nathan Gibson, “Thinking in ⅃TЯ,” Right2Left DHSI, 8 June 2019, https://tinyurl.com/gibson190608 A Dizzying Tour of Directionality #sinistrodextrification Nathan Gibson, “Thinking in ⅃TЯ,” Right2Left DHSI, 8 June 2019, https://tinyurl.com/gibson190608 Modern Writing Systems Image: Adapted from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wi ki/File:WritingSystemsOfTheWorld. svg. Creator of the vector version: Pmx. Original work: Maximilian Dörrbecker, CC BY-SA 3.0. Nathan Gibson, “Thinking in ⅃TЯ,” Right2Left DHSI, 8 June 2019, https://tinyurl.com/gibson190608 Selected Languages* with Primarily Right-to-Left Writing Systems by Number of First-Language Speakers #5 Arabic 319 (millions) #10 Lahnda (Western Punjabi, etc.) 119 #20 Urdu 69 #23 Persian 62 * Or macrolanguages. ** May include non-primary speakers Pushto 38** Source: Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, and Charles Sindhi 25 D. Fennig, eds. 2019. “Summary by Language Size” [and Kurdish 22** individual language profile pages]. In Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 22nd ed. Dallas: SIL Uyghur 10** International. Hebrew 5 https://www.ethnologue.com/statistics/size. Rohingya 3** Nathan Gibson, “Thinking in ⅃TЯ,” Right2Left DHSI, 8 June 2019, https://tinyurl.com/gibson190608 > half a billion people almost 10% of the world population Nathan Gibson, “Thinking in ⅃TЯ,” Right2Left DHSI, 8 June 2019, https://tinyurl.com/gibson190608 The State of Standards (Past Meets Present) Plain Text Logical vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Power, Law and Justice in Ancient Macedonia Joseph Roisman
    Royal Power, Law and Justice in Ancient Macedonia Joseph Roisman In his speech On the Crown Demosthenes often lionizes himself by suggesting that his actions and policy required him to overcome insurmountable obstacles. Thus he contrasts Athens’ weakness around 346 B.C.E. with Macedonia’s strength, and Philip’s II unlimited power with the more constrained and cumbersome decision-making process at home, before asserting that in spite of these difficulties he succeeded in forging later a large Greek coalition to confront Philip in the battle of Chaeronea (Dem.18.234–37). [F]irst, he (Philip) ruled in his own person as full sovereign over subservient people, which is the most important factor of all in waging war . he was flush with money, and he did whatever he wished. He did not announce his intentions in official decrees, did not deliberate in public, was not hauled into the courts by sycophants, was not prosecuted for moving illegal proposals, was not accountable to anyone. In short, he was ruler, commander, in control of everything.1 For his depiction of Philip’s authority Demosthenes looks less to Macedonia than to Athens, because what makes the king powerful in his speech is his freedom from democratic checks. Nevertheless, his observations on the Macedonian royal power is more informative and helpful than Aristotle’s references to it in his Politics, though modern historians tend to privilege the philosopher for what he says or even does not say on the subject. Aristotle’s seldom mentions Macedonian kings, and when he does it is for limited, exemplary purposes, lumping them with other kings who came to power through benefaction and public service, or who were assassinated by men they had insulted.2 Moreover, according to Aristotle, the extreme of tyranny is distinguished from ideal kingship (pambasilea) by the fact that tyranny is a government that is not called to account.
    [Show full text]
  • Early-Alphabets-3.Pdf
    Early Alphabets Alphabetic characteristics 1 Cretan Pictographs 11 Hieroglyphics 16 The Phoenician Alphabet 24 The Greek Alphabet 31 The Latin Alphabet 39 Summary 53 GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS 1 / 53 Alphabetic characteristics 3,000 BCE Basic building blocks of written language GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 2 / 53 Early visual language systems were disparate and decentralized 3,000 BCE Protowriting, Cuneiform, Heiroglyphs and far Eastern writing all functioned differently Rebuses, ideographs, logograms, and syllabaries · GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 3 / 53 HIEROGLYPHICS REPRESENTING THE REBUS PRINCIPAL · BEE & LEAF · SEA & SUN · BELIEF AND SEASON GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 4 / 53 PETROGLYPHIC PICTOGRAMS AND IDEOGRAPHS · CIRCA 200 BCE · UTAH, UNITED STATES GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 5 / 53 LUWIAN LOGOGRAMS · CIRCA 1400 AND 1200 BCE · TURKEY GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 6 / 53 OLD PERSIAN SYLLABARY · 600 BCE GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 7 / 53 Alphabetic structure marked an enormous societal leap 3,000 BCE Power was reserved for those who could read and write · GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 8 / 53 What is an alphabet? Definition An alphabet is a set of visual symbols or characters used to represent the elementary sounds of a spoken language. –PM · GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 9 / 53 What is an alphabet? Definition They can be connected and combined to make visual configurations signifying sounds, syllables, and words uttered by the human mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the Alphabet: an Examination of the Goldwasser Hypothesis
    Colless, Brian E. The origin of the alphabet: an examination of the Goldwasser hypothesis Antiguo Oriente: Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente Vol. 12, 2014 Este documento está disponible en la Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina, repositorio institucional desarrollado por la Biblioteca Central “San Benito Abad”. Su objetivo es difundir y preservar la producción intelectual de la Institución. La Biblioteca posee la autorización del autor para su divulgación en línea. Cómo citar el documento: Colless, Brian E. “The origin of the alphabet : an examination of the Goldwasser hypothesis” [en línea], Antiguo Oriente : Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente 12 (2014). Disponible en: http://bibliotecadigital.uca.edu.ar/repositorio/revistas/origin-alphabet-goldwasser-hypothesis.pdf [Fecha de consulta:..........] . 03 Colless - Alphabet_Antiguo Oriente 09/06/2015 10:22 a.m. Página 71 THE ORIGIN OF THE ALPHABET: AN EXAMINATION OF THE GOLDWASSER HYPOTHESIS BRIAN E. COLLESS [email protected] Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand Summary: The Origin of the Alphabet Since 2006 the discussion of the origin of the Semitic alphabet has been given an impetus through a hypothesis propagated by Orly Goldwasser: the alphabet was allegedly invented in the 19th century BCE by illiterate Semitic workers in the Egyptian turquoise mines of Sinai; they saw the picturesque Egyptian inscriptions on the site and borrowed a number of the hieroglyphs to write their own language, using a supposedly new method which is now known by the technical term acrophony. The main weakness of the theory is that it ignores the West Semitic acrophonic syllabary, which already existed, and contained most of the letters of the alphabet.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Roman Epigraphy an Inscription in the Lapis Niger
    To read or not to read: an introduction to Roman epigraphy An inscription in the Lapis Niger (‘Black Stone’) The Lapis Niger, an area of ill-omen and an early cult site in the Forum Romanum, was paved in black stone by Sulla around 80 BC. It provides the earliest evidence of Rome’s comitium (an assembly meeting-point) and contains one of the oldest surviving inscriptions in ancient Rome. The archaic inscription found within this area, often called a cippus (CIL 1.2.1), is an excellent case study, both for archaic Rome and for the use of inscriptions as evidence. This unassuming slab of grey tufa has the distinction of being one of the most confounding objects from antiquity. Even the name, Lapis Niger, often used by scholars for the inscription, is a term coined by the ancient sources for the area around Sulla’s pavement (not the inscription itself). To assess some of the mysteries behind this inscription one must examine it both as a text and as a monument. This involves looking not only at the writing but how it was displayed and in what context it was placed. In this respect the inscription falls within a number of fields, and requires literary, archaeological, geographic and sometimes geological analysis. This study will consider a number of different approaches to show to illustrate both the insights and the limitations of this source. The role of context: what can urban and archaeological contexts tell us about an inscription? The location of this inscription and the fact that it remains in situ provides a wealth of information (especially in Rome, a city that is notorious for ‘eating itself’: materials are often moved and reused).
    [Show full text]
  • JOSEPH WILLIAM DAY Emeritus Professor of Classics ADDRESS
    JOSEPH WILLIAM DAY Emeritus Professor of Classics ADDRESS Department of Classics Office tel.: (765) 361-6348 Wabash College Mobile tel.: (765) 918-2389 Crawfordsville, IN 47933 Fax: (765) 361-6470 E-Mail: [email protected] INTERESTS General & teaching: Greek and Latin languages and literatures Greek religion Ancient history, including social and cultural history Ancient sport and athletics Greek art and archaeology Research: Greek metrical inscriptions, the inscribed objects and their contexts, and the ancient reception of each Links among early Greek poetry, religion, art, and society Aspects of Byzantine culture and continuities in the Hellenic tradition Athenian popular history EDUCATION Gonzaga University, B.A. in Classics (1970, summa). Stanford University, M.A. (1973), Ph.D. (1978) in Classics. EMPLOYMENT and TEACHING American School of Classical Studies at Athens Elizabeth Whitehead Visiting Professor, 2011-2012 Seminar: inscribed Greek epigram Wabash College Award: 2010 McLain-McTurnan-Arnold Award for Excellence in Teaching. Rank: • Assistant Professor, F1983, 1985-1989 • Associate Professor, 1989-1999 • Professor, 1999-2011 • Emeritus Professor, 2011- Courses taught: • Greek: all levels, frequently; advanced includes Classical tragedy, comedy, history, oratory, philosophy, New Testament, Byzantine historians • Latin: intermediate (3 times); advanced many times, including historians, comedians, Age of Caesar, Age of Nero, Age of the Flavians, Latin sources for Roman history 1 • History: Greek survey (alternate years); Roman survey
    [Show full text]
  • A STUDY of WRITING Oi.Uchicago.Edu Oi.Uchicago.Edu /MAAM^MA
    oi.uchicago.edu A STUDY OF WRITING oi.uchicago.edu oi.uchicago.edu /MAAM^MA. A STUDY OF "*?• ,fii WRITING REVISED EDITION I. J. GELB Phoenix Books THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS oi.uchicago.edu This book is also available in a clothbound edition from THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS TO THE MOKSTADS THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, CHICAGO & LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1952 in the International Copyright Union. All rights reserved. Published 1952. Second Edition 1963. First Phoenix Impression 1963. Printed in the United States of America oi.uchicago.edu PREFACE HE book contains twelve chapters, but it can be broken up structurally into five parts. First, the place of writing among the various systems of human inter­ communication is discussed. This is followed by four Tchapters devoted to the descriptive and comparative treatment of the various types of writing in the world. The sixth chapter deals with the evolution of writing from the earliest stages of picture writing to a full alphabet. The next four chapters deal with general problems, such as the future of writing and the relationship of writing to speech, art, and religion. Of the two final chapters, one contains the first attempt to establish a full terminology of writing, the other an extensive bibliography. The aim of this study is to lay a foundation for a new science of writing which might be called grammatology. While the general histories of writing treat individual writings mainly from a descriptive-historical point of view, the new science attempts to establish general principles governing the use and evolution of writing on a comparative-typological basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Rongorongo Script: Carving Techniques and Scribal Corrections
    Journal de la Société des Océanistes 129 | juillet-décembre 2009 Varia Rongorongo Script: Carving Techniques and Scribal Corrections Paul Horley Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/jso/5813 DOI: 10.4000/jso.5813 ISSN: 1760-7256 Publisher Société des océanistes Printed version Date of publication: 15 December 2009 Number of pages: 249-261 ISBN: 978-2-85430-026-0 ISSN: 0300-953x Electronic reference Paul Horley, « Rongorongo Script: Carving Techniques and Scribal Corrections », Journal de la Société des Océanistes [Online], 129 | juillet-décembre 2009, Online since 30 December 2012, connection on 30 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/jso/5813 ; DOI : 10.4000/jso.5813 © Tous droits réservés Rongorongo Script: Carving Techniques and Scribal Corrections by Paul HORLEY* ABSTRACT RÉSUMÉ Studies of three original rongorongo tablets (Tahua, L’étude menée sur trois tablettes rongorongo origina- Aruku Kurenga and Mamari) revealed clear traces of les (Tahua, Aruku Kurenga et Mamari) montre claire- two-stage carving (pre-incising with an obsidian flake ment que les signes ont été tracés au cours de deux and contour enhancement with a shark tooth). Most étapes successives : pré-incision avec un éclat d’obsi- probably, the texts were written in short fragments with dienne puis gravure des contours avec une dent de requin. shark-tooth engraving applied before passing to the next Il est probable que de courts fragments de textes étaient fragment. Additional multiple engraving sessions might écrits et gravés à l’aide d’une dent de requin avant de been performed for finished inscription, aiming to tracer le fragment de texte suivant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Alphabet Sight and Sounds of the Greek Letters (Module B) the Letters and Pronunciation of the Greek Alphabet 2 Phonology (Part 2)
    The Greek Alphabet Sight and Sounds of the Greek Letters (Module B) The Letters and Pronunciation of the Greek Alphabet 2 Phonology (Part 2) Lesson Two Overview 2.0 Introduction, 2-1 2.1 Ten Similar Letters, 2-2 2.2 Six Deceptive Greek Letters, 2-4 2.3 Nine Different Greek Letters, 2-8 2.4 History of the Greek Alphabet, 2-13 Study Guide, 2-20 2.0 Introduction Lesson One introduced the twenty-four letters of the Greek alphabet. Lesson Two continues to present the building blocks for learning Greek phonics by merging vowels and consonants into syllables. Furthermore, this lesson underscores the similarities and dissimilarities between the Greek and English alphabetical letters and their phonemes. Almost without exception, introductory Greek grammars launch into grammar and vocabulary without first firmly grounding a student in the Greek phonemic system. This approach is appropriate if a teacher is present. However, it is little help for those who are “going at it alone,” or a small group who are learning NTGreek without the aid of a teacher’s pronunciation. This grammar’s introductory lessons go to great lengths to present a full-orbed pronunciation of the Erasmian Greek phonemic system. Those who are new to the Greek language without an instructor’s guidance will welcome this help, and it will prepare them to read Greek and not simply to translate it into their language. The phonic sounds of the Greek language are required to be carefully learned. A saturation of these sounds may be accomplished by using the accompanying MP3 audio files.
    [Show full text]
  • I.Sicily, Open Scholarship, and the Epigraphic Landscape of Hellenistic/Roman Sicily Jonathan R.W
    I.Sicily, Open Scholarship, and the Epigraphic Landscape of Hellenistic/Roman Sicily Jonathan R.W. Prag To cite this version: Jonathan R.W. Prag. I.Sicily, Open Scholarship, and the Epigraphic Landscape of Hellenistic/Roman Sicily. KTÈMA Civilisations de l’Orient, de la Grèce et de Rome antiques, Université de Strasbourg, 2019, La rhétorique de la diplomatie en Grèce ancienne, 44, pp.107-121. halshs-02444349 HAL Id: halshs-02444349 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02444349 Submitted on 17 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. KTÈMA KTÈMA KTÈMA CIVILISATIONS DE L’ORIENT, DE LA GRÈCE ET DE ROME ANTIQUES CIVILISATIONS DE L’ORIENT, DE LA GRÈCE ET DE ROME ANTIQUES KTÈMA est une revue annuelle de recherche consacrée à l’histoire, l’archéologie et la littérature de la Grèce, de Rome, de l’Égypte et du La rhétorique de la diplomatie en Grèce ancienne Proche-Orient antiques. Fondée en 1976 par Edmond Frézouls et Cinzia Bearzot, Laura Loddo Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 Edmond Lévy, KTÈMA jouit d’une solide réputation internationale Laura Loddo Political Exiles and Their Use of Diplomacy in Classical Greece ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Alphabets of the Bible: Latin and English John Carder
    274 The Testimony, July 2004 The alphabets of the Bible: Latin and English John Carder N A PREVIOUS article we looked at the trans- • The first major change is in the third letter, formation of the Hebrew aleph-bet into the originally the Hebrew gimal and then the IGreek alphabet (Apr. 2004, p. 130). In turn Greek gamma. The Etruscan language had no the Greek was used as a basis for writing down G sound, so they changed that place in the many other languages. Always the spoken lan- alphabet to a K sound. guage came first and writing later. We complete The Greek symbol was rotated slightly our look at the alphabets of the Bible by briefly by the Romans and then rounded, like the B considering Latin, then our English alphabet in and D symbols. It became the Latin letter C which we normally read the Bible. and, incidentally, created the confusion which still exists in English. Our C can have a hard From Greek to Latin ‘k’ sound, as in ‘cold’, or a soft sound, as in The Greek alphabet spread to the Romans from ‘city’. the Greek colonies on the coast of Italy, espe- • In the sixth place, either the Etruscans or the cially Naples and district. (Naples, ‘Napoli’ in Romans revived the old Greek symbol di- Italian, is from the Greek ‘Neapolis’, meaning gamma, which had been dropped as a letter ‘new city’). There is evidence that the Etruscans but retained as a numeral. They gave it an ‘f’ were also involved in an intermediate stage.
    [Show full text]