DOCSLIB.ORG

Paranoia, Politics, and Mccarthyism in the 1950 Florida Democratic Primary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paranoia, Politics, and Mccarthyism in the 1950 Florida Democratic Primary SEEING RED: PARANOIA, POLITICS, AND MCCARTHYISM IN THE 1950 FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY FOR THE U.S. SENATE ________________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences Florida Gulf Coast University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirement of the Degree of Master of Arts in History ________________________________________________________________________ By Paul Kenneth Chartrand October 11, 2013 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts ____________________________ Paul Kenneth Chartrand Approved: October 24, 2013 ____________________________ Michael Epple, Ph.D. Committee Chair / Advisor ____________________________ Irvin D. S. Winsboro, Ph.D. ____________________________ Erik Carlson, Ph.D. Abstract In 1950, Senator Claude D. Pepper and Representative George A. Smathers faced off in the Florida Democratic Primary for U.S. Senate in a battle that is deemed as one of the dirtiest campaigns in U.S. History, and for the first time in Florida history, resulted in the defeat of the incumbent. White Floridians supported and upheld the Southern traditions of Jim Crow racial discrimination and segregation. Meanwhile, the United States was adjusting to its role as a world power in the postwar era, attempting to introduce civil rights reform, and began formulating policies and strategies to deal with the perceived threats posed by the Soviet Union where both sides were capable of conducting war with nuclear weapons. This paper examines the background of each candidate, their upbringing, circumstances, environment, education, and life experiences as to how these influences contributed to the formation of each candidate’s character and political philosophy. Further, how their character and political philosophies, combined, with the important issues and events of the postwar and early Cold War era (1945–1950), to influence their decision making and the conduct of their individual campaigns during the primary, thus contributing to Smathers’s victory and Pepper’s defeat in 1950. © 2013 Paul Kenneth Chartrand ii To my Parents The late Jack K. Chartrand and Delcie McGowan Chartrand, for all your love, understanding and everything else you gave me. You live on forever in my thoughts, my words and in my heart. To my Wonderful Wife, Rebecca Lynn LeRoux Chartrand You have made all the high–points possible and every low–point bearable. I thank you and I love you. iii “Offices are as acceptable here as elsewhere, and whenever a man has cast a longing eye on them, rottenness begins in his conduct.”— Jefferson iv Contents Acknowledgements .… v Abbreviations …. viii Preface …. xi Introduction …. 1 Part I Pepper and Smathers: The Pathway to Politics Claude Denson Pepper: The Alabama Plowboy …. 4 George Armistead Smathers: The Judge’s Son …. 25 Part II McCarthyism, Communist Paranoia, and the 1950 Democratic Primary Shifting Sands: The Cold War and the Dawn of a New World Order …. 46 Communism, Race, and the Changing Landscape of the American Polity …. 66 “Red Pepper” “Gorgeous George “and the 1950 Primary Campaign in Florida …. 88 Conclusions …. 115 v Acknowledgements It is impossible to mention everyone who assisted me in developing this thesis from a notion to fruition, and equally impossible to ignore their contributions to my research efforts. To all of the library staff who did the laborious task of retrieving and returning numerous boxes of papers, and volumes of books to and from the shelves, I thank you for your hard work that helped make this project possible. The bulk of my research took place at the Claude Pepper Library in the Claude Pepper Center at the Florida State University in Tallahassee, Florida, Special and Area Studies Collections of the PK Yonge Library of Florida History in the George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida, Harry S. Truman Library, Independence, Missouri, and the Library–Archives of the Wisconsin Historical Society in Madison, Wisconsin. My appreciation goes to Robert Rubero, Supervisor of Operations Claude Pepper Library, John R. Nemmers, Assistant University Librarian, Dept. of Special and Area Studies Collections, Dr. James Cusick, Curator of the P.K. Yonge Library of Florida History at the George A. Smathers Libraries, Richard L. Pifer, Director of Reference and Public Services, Helmut Knies, Archives Collection Processing and Preservation, and to Harry Miller, Archives Reference Services at the Wisconsin Historical Society for all of their insight and expertise in assisting in my research and making me feel welcome during my visits. I wish to thank Dr. Randy Sowell, Head Archivist and James Armistead, Archivist at the Harry S Truman Library for their knowledge, expertise, and valuable assistance during my visit. I also wish to acknowledge the contributions of Rachel Tait, Senior Library Technical Assistant, and all of the staff at the Florida Gulf Coast University Library for their assistance in procuring vi books, newspapers, dissertations, and journal articles necessary to the research of this project. I am most grateful for the cooperation, assistance, guidance and patience of my advisor, Dr. Michael Epple, for allowing me to overcome a great deal of personal adversity to make this project successful. To Dr. Irvin D. S. Winsboro for his inspiration to look at Florida history with greater appreciation, to explore the depth of possibilities for historical research that Florida history has to offer, and for his passion and willingness to push students to achieve their greatest potential—I give my most profound thanks. To Dr. Nicola Foote, who helped me overcome the numerous hurdles of bureaucracy and challenged me to broaden my historical horizons, I thank you for your help and guidance. I wish to thank Dr. Paul R. Rivera for his confidence in my abilities as a budding scholar and his providing me with the confidence and inspiration to continue forward. I wish to thank Dr. Eric Strahorn for helping me to understand the importance of the philosophical roots of the discipline and to prepare me and others to meet the challenges of the profession beyond the classroom. I sincerely thank Dr. Michael Cole and Dr. Erik Carlson for encouraging and stimulating my intellectual curiosities while helping me to develop the skills necessary to be a historian. To Dr. John Cox for his mentoring, honest evaluation, and critique of my writing toward increasing the level of professionalism and scholarship in my work, I give my gratitude. I wish to thank every member of the History Department at Florida Gulf Coast University for their dedication, passion, level of professionalism and scholarship, and for setting a standard of excellence not only in the classroom, but more importantly, in the quality of their professional work. vii Finally, I wish to acknowledge Leonard and Tina Robbins, Peter and Suzanne Chartrand, Edward and Susan Chartrand, Victor and June LeRoux, Lorraine LeRoux, Ted Sutton, my wife Rebecca, and my parents, the late Jack K. and Delcie Chartrand—their constant love, encouragement, and support, made this project possible. viii Abbreviations AAA — Agricultural Adjustment Act ACL — Atlantic Coast Line ADA — Americans for Democratic Action AFL — American Federation of Labor CAA — Civilian Aeronautics Administration CCC — Civilian Conservation Corps CIO–PAC — Congress of Industrial Organizations Political Action Committee CWA — Civil Works Administration DSH — Division Subsistence Homesteads EBA — Emergency Banking Act ERP — European Recovery Plan (The Marshall Plan) FBI — Federal Bureau of Investigation FDIC — Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FDR — Franklin Delano Roosevelt FEC — Florida East Coast Railway FERA — Federal Emergency Relief Administration FEPC — Fair Employment Practices Committee FEPC — Fair Employment Practices Commission FHA — Federal Housing Administration FLSA — Fair Labor Standards Act FRG — Federal Republic of Germany FSA — Federal Security Agency FSRA — Federal Surplus Relief Corporation GDR — German Democratic Republic HOLC — Homeowners Loan Corporation ix HICCASP — Hollywood Independent Citizens Committee of the Arts, Sciences and Professions ICCASP — Independent Citizens Committee of the Arts, Sciences and Professions JAG — Judge Advocate General KGB — Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti (Committee for State Security) NAACP — National Association for the Advancement of Colored People NATO — North Atlantic Treaty Organization NCPAC — National Citizens Political Action Committee NIRA — National Industrial Recovery Act NKVD — Narodnyy Komissariat Vnutrennikh Del (The People’s Commissariat for Internal Security) NRA — National Recovery Act NWLB — National War Labor Board OPA — Office of Price Administration PCA — Progressive Citizens of America PKWN — Polski Komitet Wyzwolenia Narodowego (Polish Committee of National Liberation) PRRA — Puerto Rican Recovery Act PSF — President’s Secretary’s Files (Truman Papers, Truman Library) PWA — Publics Works Administration RFC — Reconstruction Finance Corporation SMOF — Staff Members and Office Files (Truman Library) SSA — Social Security Administration TVA — Tennessee Valley Authority UDA — Union for Democratic Action UN — United Nations USHA — United States Housing Authority USSR — Union of Soviet Socialist Republics x VE Day — Victory in Europe Day VJ Day — Victory over Japan Day VMB — Volar Marine Bomber WPA — Works Progress Administration WPB —
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record—Senate S1183
    January 25, 2007 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S1183 gave the Iraqi people a chance for free It is with that background that, in- Iraq. A resolution was passed out on a elections and a chance to write their deed, it is a great honor for me that vote of something like 12 to 9 yester- own Constitution. Those successes the family has asked me to deliver the day. It was bipartisan in the passing, which did occur were the result of eulogy. It will be a great privilege for but it was basically a partisan vote. great determination by our troops in me, next Monday, to recall the great Save for one member of the minority uniform and many brave Iraqis who life and times of this great American on the Senate Foreign Relations Com- stepped forward and risked their lives and great Floridian. I will just mention mittee, all of the minority voted to move their nation forward. a couple of things in his career. I will against the resolution. But almost to a But we all know the situation today. elaborate at greater length and will in- person, all of the members of the Sen- As of this morning, we have lost 3,057 troduce that eulogy into the RECORD of ate Foreign Relations Committee, both American soldiers. We know that over the Senate after I have given it. sides of the aisle, had expressed their 23,000 have returned from Iraq with in- I wish to mention that was a Senate dissatisfaction, individually in their juries, almost 7,000 with serious inju- which had giants with whom all of us statements in front of the committee, ries—amputations, blindness, serious in my generation grew up—Symington with the President’s intention to in- burns, traumatic brain injury.
    [Show full text]
  • The Position of Secretary of Defense: Statutory Restrictions and Civilian-Military Relations
    The Position of Secretary of Defense: Statutory Restrictions and Civilian-Military Relations Updated January 6, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44725 Position of Secretary of Defense: Statutory Restrictions and Civilian-Military Relations Summary The position of Secretary of Defense is unique within the United States government; it is one of two civilian positions within the military chain of command, although unlike the President, the Secretary of Defense is not elected. Section 113 of the United States Code states that the Secretary of Defense is to be “appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.” The section goes on to elaborate a key mechanism by which civilian control of the armed forces is maintained: A person may not be appointed as Secretary of Defense within seven years after relief from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed force. The proposed nomination of General (Ret.) Lloyd Austin, United States Army, who retired from the military in 2016, to be Secretary of Defense may lead both houses of Congress to consider whether and how to suspend, change, or remove that provision. This provision was originally contained in the 1947 National Security Act (P.L. 80-253), which mandated that 10 years pass between the time an officer is relieved from active duty and when he or she could be appointed to the office of the Secretary of Defense. In 2007, Section 903 of the FY2008 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 110-181), Congress changed the period of time that must elapse between relief from active duty and appointment to the position of Secretary of Defense to seven years.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Russell, the Senate Armed Services Committee & Oversight of America’S Defense, 1955-1968
    BALANCING CONSENSUS, CONSENT, AND COMPETENCE: RICHARD RUSSELL, THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE & OVERSIGHT OF AMERICA’S DEFENSE, 1955-1968 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Joshua E. Klimas, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor David Stebenne, Advisor Professor John Guilmartin Advisor Professor James Bartholomew History Graduate Program ABSTRACT This study examines Congress’s role in defense policy-making between 1955 and 1968, with particular focus on the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), its most prominent and influential members, and the evolving defense authorization process. The consensus view holds that, between World War II and the drawdown of the Vietnam War, the defense oversight committees showed acute deference to Defense Department legislative and budget requests. At the same time, they enforced closed oversight procedures that effectively blocked less “pro-defense” members from influencing the policy-making process. Although true at an aggregate level, this understanding is incomplete. It ignores the significant evolution to Armed Services Committee oversight practices that began in the latter half of 1950s, and it fails to adequately explore the motivations of the few members who decisively shaped the process. SASC chairman Richard Russell (D-GA) dominated Senate deliberations on defense policy. Relying only on input from a few key colleagues – particularly his protégé and eventual successor, John Stennis (D-MS) – Russell for the better part of two decades decided almost in isolation how the Senate would act to oversee the nation’s defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Today We Are Interviewing Mr
    1 CENTER FOR FLORIDA HISTORY ORAL HISTORY PROGRAM INTERVIEW WITH: HOMER HOOKS INTERVIEWER: JAMES M. DENHAM PLACE: LAKELAND, FLORIDA DATE: JULY 29, 2003 M= JAMES M. DENHAM (Mike) H= HOMER HOOKS M: Today we are interviewing Mr. Homer Hooks and we are going to talk today about the legacy of Lawton Chiles and hopefully follow this up with future discussions of Mr. Hooks’ business career and career in politics. Good morning Mr. Hooks. H: Good morning, Mike. M: As I mentioned, we, really, in the future want to talk about your service in World War II and also your business career, but today we would like to focus on your memories of Lawton Chiles. Even so, can you tell us a little bit about where you were born as well as giving us a brief biographical sketch? H: Yes, Mike. I was born in Columbia, South Carolina, on January 10, 1921. My family moved to Lake County actually in Florida when I was a child. I was 4 or 5 years old, I guess. We lived in Clermont in south Lake County. My grandfather was a pioneer. He platted the town of Clermont. The rest of the family also lived north of Clermont in the Leesburg area, but we considered ourselves pioneer Florida residents. Those were the days in 1926, ‘27 and ‘28 days and so forth. I grew up in Clermont - grammar school and high school and then immediately went to the University of Florida in 1939 and graduated in 1943, as some people have said, when the earth’s crust was still cooling, so long ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Historical Quarterly
    COVER Two eastbound trains and passengers appear to be waiting at the Archer depot for a westbound train from Gainesville, ca. 1910. The wood-burning freight on the right has arrived from Cedar Key, while the coal-burning train on the left has come from the south. The line on the right is the original “Florida Railroad” built by Senator David Levy Yulee’s company. Originating in Fernandina, the line had reached Archer by 1859, and was completed to its terminus at Cedar Key in 1861. The line on the left was built to haul phosphate from the mines in the area and other freight. It eventually went all the way to Tampa. From the collection of Herbert J. Doherty, Jr. Gainesville. Historical uarterly Volume LXVIII, Number July 1989 THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY COPYRIGHT 1989 by the Florida Historical Society, Tampa Florida. Second class postage paid at Tampa and DeLeon Springs, Florida. Printed by E. O. Painter Printing Co., DeLeon Springs, Florida. (ISSN 0015-4113) THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY Samuel Proctor, Editor Everett W. Caudle, Editorial Assistant EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD David R. Colburn University of Florida Herbert J. Doherty, Jr. University of Florida Michael V. Gannon University of Florida John K. Mahon University of Florida (Emeritus) Jerrell H. Shofner University of Central Florida Charlton W. Tebeau University of Miami (Emeritus) Correspondence concerning contributions, books for review, and all editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor, Florida Historical Quarterly, Box 14045, University Station, Gainesville, Florida 32604-2045. The Quarterly is interested in articles and documents pertaining to the history of Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Mnemonics Layout
    NON- ESSENTIAL MNEMONICS AN UNNECESSARY JOURNEY INTO SENSELESS KNOWLEDGE KENT WOODYARD ILLUSTRATIONS BY MARK DOWNEY NON- ESSENTIAL MNEMONICS AN UNNECESSARY JOURNEY INTO SENSELESS KNOWLEDGE KENT WOODYARD ILLUSTRATIONS BY MARK DOWNEY Copyright © 2014 by Kent Woodyard Illustrations © 2014 by Mark Downey All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Published by Prospect Park Books www.prospectparkbooks.com Distributed by Consortium Books Sales & Distribution www.cbsd.com Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data is on le with the Library of Congress. The following is for reference only: Woodyard, Kent Non-essential mnemonics: an unnecessary journey into senseless knowledge / by Kent Woodyard — 1st ed. ISBN: 978-1-938849-29-9 1. American wit and humor. 2. Mnemonic devices. I. Title. Design & layout by Renee Nakagawa To my friends. You know who you are. Disclaimer This is a work of ction. The data sets included are true and (predominantly) accurate, but all other elements of the book are utter nonsense and should be regarded as such. At no point was “research” or anything approaching an academic process employed during the writing of the mnemonic descriptions or prose portions of this book. Any quotations, historical descriptions, or autobiographical details bearing any resemblance to realities in the world around
    [Show full text]
  • The South Shore Community Center
    The South Shore Community Center The Case for its Preservation David D. McKinney, Ph.D. Architectural Historian [email protected] August 17, 2020 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Historical Context 2 Changing City, Declining Reputation 2 Sending the “Red Pepper” Back to Congress 3 Architectural Understatement was not his Style 4 Diagnosing and Prescribing for the Most Fabulous Invalid 4 Morris Lapidus, A Modernist? 5 Barocco Rococo: A Symbol of Bad Taste 7 Radical Change in Future Designs 7 In Actuality an Evolution in Design 8 South Shore 9 Ripe for Renewal 9 Seniors Exercise their Political Power 9 The South Shore Community Center 10 A Centerpiece of Urban Renewal 10 Designed for Seniors and for the South Shore Neighborhood 12 An Illustration of Lapidus’ Evolution as an Architect 13 Relationship to Miami Beach Architecture and its Climate 14 From “form follows function” to “form follows purpose” 14 Reimagining a Miami Beach building type 14 Path and Place 16 Complexity of Program 19 South Shore Community Center: In the Life of the City and the Eye of the Nation 19 A Result of Senior Activism 19 A National Model 20 A Place to be Heard 21 A Harbinger of Demographic Change 22 Conclusion: The Case of Preservation 23 Miami Beach Heritage is Ongoing 23 The South Shore Community Center A Case for Its Preservation Introduction To demolish the South Shore Community Center is to erase a chapter from Miami Beach’s history, the legacy of Rep. Claude Pepper’s national advocacy for the elderly, and the career of architect Morris Lapidus.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackmail in the Deep State
    Blackmail in the Deep State: From the Bay of Pigs and JFK Assassination to Watergate Jonathan Marshall Note: this article is excerpted from an unpublished book titled Watergate, the American Deep State, and the Legacy of Secret Government by Jonathan Marshall. The Watergate affair of 1972-74, though widely regarded as one of the the gravest political and constitutional crises in U.S. history, began not with a bang but a whimper – or as President Nixon’s press secretary dismissed it, a ‘third-rate burglary attempt’.1 Despite myriad government probes, lawsuits, news stories, and scholarly analyses, no one knows for sure what motivated the historic break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters during the 1972 presidential campaign.2 Another unresolved puzzle is why President Nixon, who was apparently ignorant of plans for the burglary, did not simply fire those involved and cut his losses. What cost him the presidency was not the original crime, but his illegal attempt to cover it up. I argue in the book from which this article is excerpted that the initial burglary was set in motion by White House insiders to uncover information they could use against the Democratic Party’s chairman, Larry O’Brien. A major goal was to prevent him from releasing politically damaging secrets 1 Quoted in Karlyn Barker and Walter Pincus, ‘Watergate Revisited; 20 Years After the Break-in, the Story Continues to Unfold’, Washington Post, 14 June 1992. 2 There were at least two break-ins; police arrested the burglars on 17 June 1972. Several dozen theories are noted in Edward Epstein and John Berendt, ‘Did There Come a Point in Time When There Were 43 Different Theories of How Watergate Happened?’ Esquire, November 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Bartlett Interviewer: Fred Holborn Date of Interview: January 6, 1965 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C
    Charles Bartlett Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 1/6/1965 Administrative Information Creator: Charles Bartlett Interviewer: Fred Holborn Date of Interview: January 6, 1965 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 91 pp. Biographical Note Bartlett, Washington correspondent for the Chattanooga Times from 1948 to 1962, columnist for the Chicago Daily News, and personal friend of John F. Kennedy (JFK), discusses his role in introducing Jacqueline Bouvier to JFK, JFK’s relationship with Lyndon Baines Johnson, and JFK’s Cabinet appointments, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed October 11, 1983, copyright of these materials has been assigned to United States Government. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form. Direct your questions concerning copyright to the reference staff.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of the Records That Petitioners Seek Is Attached to the Petition, Filed Concurrently Herewith
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Professor Stanley Kutler, the American Historical Association, the American Society for Legal History, the Organization of American Historians, and the Society of American Archivists petition this Court for an order directing the release of President Richard M. Nixon’s thirty-five-year- old grand jury testimony and associated materials of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force.1 On June 23-24, 1975, President Nixon testified before two members of a federal grand jury who had traveled from Washington, DC, to San Clemente, California. The testimony was then presented in Washington, DC, to the full grand jury that had been convened to investigate political espionage, illegal campaign contributions, and other wrongdoing falling under the umbrella term Watergate. Watergate was the defining event of Richard Nixon’s presidency. In the early 1970s, as the Vietnam War raged and the civil rights movement in the United States continued its momentum, the Watergate scandal ignited a crisis of confidence in government leadership and a constitutional crisis that tested the limits of executive power and the mettle of the democratic process. “Watergate” was 1A list of the records that petitioners seek is attached to the Petition, filed concurrently herewith.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Natural Resources Inventory
    2020 NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY TOWNSHIP OF MONTGOMERY SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Prepared By: Tara Kenyon, AICP/PP Principal NJ License #33L100631400 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 5 AGRICULTURE ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY IN AND AROUND MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP ...................................................... 7 REGULATIONS AND PROGRAMS RELATED TO AGRICULTURE ...................................................................... 11 HEALTH IMPACTS OF AGRICULTURAL AVAILABILITY AND LOSS TO HUMANS, PLANTS AND ANIMALS .... 14 HOW IS MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP WORKING TO SUSTAIN AND ENHANCE AGRICULTURE? ................... 16 RECOMMENDATIONS AND POTENTIAL PROJECTS .......................................................................................... 18 CITATIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 19 AIR QUALITY .............................................................................................................................................................. 21 CHARACTERISTICS OF AIR .................................................................................................................................. 21
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Upper Deck Overwatch League Ultimate Fan (#Owlultimatefan) Program Contest Official Rules
    2020 UPPER DECK OVERWATCH LEAGUE ULTIMATE FAN (#OWLULTIMATEFAN) PROGRAM CONTEST OFFICIAL RULES NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. A PURCHASE WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR ODDS OF WINNING. WINNERS WILL BE REQUIRED TO RESPOND TO THE WINNER NOTIFICATION AND/OR COMPLETE AND EXECUTE A RELEASE AND PRIZE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT AND ANY OTHER LEGAL DOCUMENTS WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME REQUIRED BY SPONSOR OR PRIZES MAY BE FORFEITED (IN SPONSOR’S SOLE DISCRETION). ANY TERMS DEFINED IN THE RELEASE SHALL BE THE SAME AS THOSE DEFINED IN THE RULES. BY ENTERING THIS CONTEST DEFINED BELOW, YOU AGREE TO THESE OFFICIAL RULES, WHICH ARE A CONTRACT, SO READ THEM CAREFULLY BEFORE ENTERING THIS CONTEST. THIS CONTEST EXPRESSLY EXCLUDES QUEBEC, FLORIDA, RHODE ISLAND AND PUERTO RICO. WITHOUT LIMITATION, THIS CONTRACT INCLUDES INDEMNITIES TO THE SPONSOR FROM YOU AND A LIMITATION OF YOUR RIGHTS AND REMEDIES. 1. NAME OF CONTEST: 2020 Upper Deck Overwatch League Ultimate Fan Program Contest (“Contest”). 2. SPONSOR: This Contest is sponsored by The Upper Deck Company located at 5830 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, California 92008 (“UDC” or “Sponsor”). 3. CONTEST PERIOD: August 27, 2020 at 9 a.m. Pacific Standard Time (“PST”) to October 5, 2020 at 9 p.m. PST (“Contest Period”). For more information please see the Contest details located at www.upperdeck.com/OWLUltimateFan (the “Website”). 4. ELIGIBILITY: The Contest is open and offered only to natural persons Entrants who are legal residents of (a) the fifty (50) United States of America (“USA”), including Washington D.C., but excluding Florida, Rhode Island and Puerto Rico who are at least eighteen (18) years old or the age required in the state in which he or she resides at the time of Entry in the USA, and/or (b) the provinces and territories of Canada, excluding Quebec, who have reached the age of majority in their jurisdiction of residence.
    [Show full text]