Appendix B.5 Scheduled Monuments in Orkney
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bus Route X1
www.stagecoachbus.com Telephone: 01856870555. Bus Route: X1 (Stromness – Finstown – Kirkwall – St Margaret’s Hope) The following pages contain timetable information for the X1 bus route travelling to destinations between Stromness and St Margaret’s Hope. The timetables have been split into Monday to Friday (Part 1 - Departure times between 06:00 and 12:30), Monday to Friday (Part 2 - Departure times between 13:20 and 18:00), Monday to Friday (Part 3 - Departure times between 18:30 and 21:05), Saturday (Part 1 - Departure times between 07:00 and 13:30), Saturday (Part 2 - Departure times between 14:30 and 01:30), Sunday (Part 1 - Kirkwall to Stromness only) and Sunday (Part 2 – Stromness to Kirkwall only) A guide to codes is available at the end of this document. Monday to Friday (Part 1) X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 Stromness - Hamnavoe. 06:00 - - 07:50 08:30 08:40 09:30 10:30 11:30 12:30 Stromness Travel Centre - Arr. 06:05 - - 07:55 08:35 08:45 09:35 10:35 11:35 12:35 Stromness Travel Centre - Dep. 06:10 - 07:17 08:00 08:40 08:50 09:40 10:40 11:40 12:40 Brig O’Waithe. 06:15 - 07:22 08:05 08:45 08:55 09:45 10:45 11:45 12:45 Finstown - Allan’s of Gillock. 06:25 - 07:32 08:15 08:55 09:05 09:55 10:55 11:55 12:55 Hatston. 06:35 - 07:42 08:25 09:05 09:15 10:05 11:05 12:05 13:05 Kirkwall T C - Stand 2 - Arr. -
3 St Magnus Earl of Orkney
UHI Research Database pdf download summary Storyways Gibbon, Sarah Jane; Moore, James Published in: Open Archaeology Publication date: 2019 Publisher rights: © 2019 Sarah Jane Gibbon et al., published by De Gruyter. The re-use license for this item is: CC BY The Document Version you have downloaded here is: Peer reviewed version The final published version is available direct from the publisher website at: 10.1515/opar-2019-0016 Link to author version on UHI Research Database Citation for published version (APA): Gibbon, S. J., & Moore, J. (2019). Storyways: Visualising Saintly Impact in a North Atlantic Maritime Landscape. Open Archaeology, 5(1), 235-262. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2019-0016 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the UHI Research Database are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights: 1) Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the UHI Research Database for the purpose of private study or research. 2) You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain 3) You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the UHI Research Database Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details; we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 Open Archaeology 2019; 5: 235–262 Original Study Sarah Jane Gibbon*, James Moore Storyways: Visualising Saintly Impact in a North Atlantic Maritime Landscape https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2019-0016 Received February 28, 2019; accepted May 17, 2019 Abstract: This paper presents a new methodological approach and theorising framework which visualises intangible landscapes. -
Pictish Symbol Stones and Early Cross-Slabs from Orkney
Proc Soc Antiq Scot 144 (2014), PICTISH169–204 SYMBOL STONES AND EARLY CROSS-SLABS FROM ORKNEY | 169 Pictish symbol stones and early cross-slabs from Orkney Ian G Scott* and Anna Ritchie† ABSTRACT Orkney shared in the flowering of interest in stone carving that took place throughout Scotland from the 7th century AD onwards. The corpus illustrated here includes seven accomplished Pictish symbol- bearing stones, four small stones incised with rough versions of symbols, at least one relief-ornamented Pictish cross-slab, thirteen cross-slabs (including recumbent slabs), two portable cross-slabs and two pieces of church furniture in the form of an altar frontal and a portable altar slab. The art-historical context for this stone carving shows close links both with Shetland to the north and Caithness to the south, as well as more distant links with Iona and with the Pictish mainland south of the Moray Firth. The context and function of the stones are discussed and a case is made for the existence of an early monastery on the island of Flotta. While much has been written about the Picts only superb building stone but also ideal stone for and early Christianity in Orkney, illustration of carving, and is easily accessible on the foreshore the carved stones has mostly taken the form of and by quarrying. It fractures naturally into flat photographs and there is a clear need for a corpus rectilinear slabs, which are relatively soft and can of drawings of the stones in related scales in easily be incised, pecked or carved in relief. -
Results of the Seabird 2000 Census – Great Skua
July 2011 THE DATA AND MAPS PRESENTED IN THESE PAGES WAS INITIALLY PUBLISHED IN SEABIRD POPULATIONS OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND: RESULTS OF THE SEABIRD 2000 CENSUS (1998-2002). The full citation for the above publication is:- P. Ian Mitchell, Stephen F. Newton, Norman Ratcliffe and Timothy E. Dunn (Eds.). 2004. Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland: results of the Seabird 2000 census (1998-2002). Published by T and A.D. Poyser, London. More information on the seabirds of Britain and Ireland can be accessed via http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1530. To find out more about JNCC visit http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1729. Table 1a Numbers of breeding Great Skuas (AOT) in Scotland and Ireland 1969–2002. Administrative area Operation Seafarer SCR Census Seabird 2000 Percentage Percentage or country (1969–70) (1985–88) (1998–2002) change since change since Seafarer SCR Shetland 2,968 5,447 6,846 131% 26% Orkney 88 2,0001 2,209 2410% 10% Western Isles– 19 113 345 1716% 205% Comhairle nan eilean Caithness 0 2 5 150% Sutherland 4 82 216 5300% 163% Ross & Cromarty 0 1 8 700% Lochaber 0 0 2 Argyll & Bute 0 0 3 Scotland Total 3,079 7,645 9,634 213% 26% Co. Mayo 0 0 1 Ireland Total 0 0 1 Britain and Ireland Total 3,079 7,645 9,635 213% 26% Note 1 Extrapolated from a count of 1,652 AOT in 1982 (Meek et al., 1985) using previous trend data (Furness, 1986) to estimate numbers in 1986 (see Lloyd et al., 1991). -
NEWSLETTER of the ORKNEY FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY No 79 September 2016
SIB FOLK NEWS NEWSLETTER OF THE ORKNEY FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY No 79 September 2016 GRAPHICS JOHN SINCLAIR 2 NEWSLETTER OF THE ORKNEY FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Issue No 79 September 2016 ORKNEY FAMILY HISTORY NEWSLETTER No 79 SEPTEMBER 2016 COVER SIB HIGHLIGHTS PAGE 2 From the Chair PAGES 3,4,5 more reminiscences from Jackie Brown Pages 6 & 7 Peter's very important ancestor From PAGES 8,9,10 Norman Windwick the Chair recalls his childhood at the Toc H Welcome to the September issue of the Sib Folk News at the end of a PAGE 11 summer of lovely weather and a very busy time in the office. In Orkney as a Tumbledown 'Gyrehouse' Stenness whole, we must have had record numbers of tourists this year with over 100 cruise ships including Orkney in their itinerary plus all the holidaymakers who PAGES 12 & 13 visited our islands. The Kirkwall Shops. A stroll down The Family History Society had a table in the exhibition hall at the Vintage memory lane Rally in August and it was good to see and have a chat with our members and welcome some new ones as well. Remember, we look forward to seeing PAGES 14 & 15 you in the office if you get stuck with your research or if you just want to say Captain James 'hello'. Renton Waters The website is being updated with more interesting and helpful resources PAGES 16 & 17 Mandy Thomson bitten so don't forget to check out www.orkneyfhs.co.uk and you will be amazed by the Orkney at the amount of information freely available to our members. -
THE VIKINGS in ORKNEY James Graham-Campbell
THE VIKINGS IN ORKNEY James Graham-Campbell Introduction In recent years, it has been suggested that the first permanent Scandinavian presence in Orkney was not the result of forcible land-taking by Vikings, but came about instead through gradual penetration - a period which has been described as one of'informal' settlement (Morris 1985: 213; 1998: 83). Such would have involved a phase of co-existence, or even integration, between the native Picts and the earliest Norse settlers. This initial period, it is supposed, was then followed by 'a second, formal, settlement associated with the estab lishment of an earldom' (Morris 1998: 83 ), in the late 9'h century. The archaeological evidence advanced in support of the first 'period of overlap' is, however, open to alternative interpretation and, indeed, Alfred Smyth has com mented ( 1984: 145), in relation to the annalistic records of the earliest Viking attacks on Ireland, that these 'strongly suggest that the Norwegians did not gradually infiltrate the Northern Isles as farmers and fisherman and then sud denly tum nasty against their neighbours'. Others have supposed that the first phase of Norse settlement in Orkney would have involved, in the words of Buteux (1997: 263): 'ness-taking' (the fortifying of a headland by means of a cross-dyke) and the occupation of small off-shore islands. Crawford ( 1987: 46) argues that headland dykes on Orkney can be interpreted as indicating ness-taking. However many are equally likely to be prehistoric land boundaries, and no bases on either headlands or small islands have yet been positively identified. Buteux continues his discussion by observing, most pertinently, that: While this can not be taken as suggesting that such sites do not remain to be uncovered, the striking fact is that almost all identified Viking-period settlements in the Northern Isles are found overlying or immediately adjacent to sites which were occupied in the preceding Pictish period and which, furthermore, had frequently been settlements of some size and importance. -
Brough of Birsay Statement of Significance
Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC278 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90034) Taken into State care: 1933 (Guardianship) Last reviewed: 2004 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE BROUGH OF BIRSAY We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office:Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH © Historic Environment Scotland 2018 You may re-use this information (excluding logos and images) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this document should be sent to us at: Historic Environment Scotland Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH +44 (0) 131 668 8600 www.historicenvironment.scot You can download this publication from our website at www.historicenvironment.scot Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office:Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH BROUGH OF BIRSAY BRIEF DESCRIPTION The monument comprises an area of Pictish to medieval settlement and ecclesiastical remains, situated on part of a small tidal island off the NW corner of Mainland Orkney. -
Service St Margaret's Hope (Ferry Terminal) - Stromness (Hamnavoe) X1 Monday - Friday (Not Bank Holidays)
Service St Margaret's Hope (Ferry Terminal) - Stromness (Hamnavoe) X1 Monday - Friday (not Bank Holidays) Operated by: OC Stagecoach Highlands Timetable valid from 5 Sep 2021 until further notice Service: X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 Notes: XPrd1 Operator: OC OC OC OC OC OC OC OC OC OC OC St Margarets Hope, Ferry terminal Depart: .... .... .... .... .... .... 07:37 .... .... 08:47 09:47 Burray, Shop .... .... .... .... .... .... 07:45 .... .... 08:55 09:55 St Marys, Graeme Park .... .... .... .... .... .... 07:54 .... .... 09:04 10:04 Kirkwall, Hospital Entrance .... .... 06:21 .... .... 07:45 08:05 .... .... 09:15 10:15 Kirkwall, Travel Centre (Stand 2) Arrive: .... .... 06:24 .... .... 07:48 08:08 .... .... 09:18 10:18 Kirkwall, Travel Centre (Stand 2) Depart: 05:05 06:05 06:25 06:55 .... 07:50 .... 08:50 .... 09:20 10:20 Kirkwall, Hatston Bus Garage 05:10 06:10 06:30 07:00 07:10 07:55 .... 08:55 09:00 09:25 10:25 Finstown, Allan's of Gillock 05:20 06:20 06:40 07:10 07:20 08:05 .... 09:05 09:10 09:35 10:35 Stenness, Garage 05:27 06:27 06:47 07:17 07:27 08:12 .... 09:12 09:17 09:42 10:42 Stromness, Travel Centre Arrive: 05:35 .... 06:55 07:25 .... 08:20 .... 09:20 09:30 09:50 10:50 Stromness, Travel Centre Depart: 05:36 .... 06:56 07:26 .... 08:22 .... 09:22 .... 09:52 10:52 Stromness, Hamnavoe Estate Arrive: 05:39 06:35 06:59 07:29 07:35 08:25 ... -
Cruising the ISLANDS of ORKNEY
Cruising THE ISLANDS OF ORKNEY his brief guide has been produced to help the cruising visitor create an enjoyable visit to TTour islands, it is by no means exhaustive and only mentions the main and generally obvious anchorages that can be found on charts. Some of the welcoming pubs, hotels and other attractions close to the harbour or mooring are suggested for your entertainment, however much more awaits to be explored afloat and many other delights can be discovered ashore. Each individual island that makes up the archipelago offers a different experience ashore and you should consult “Visit Orkney” and other local guides for information. Orkney waters, if treated with respect, should offer no worries for the experienced sailor and will present no greater problem than cruising elsewhere in the UK. Tides, although strong in some parts, are predictable and can be used to great advantage; passage making is a delight with the current in your favour but can present a challenge when against. The old cruising guides for Orkney waters preached doom for the seafarer who entered where “Dragons and Sea Serpents lie”. This hails from the days of little or no engine power aboard the average sailing vessel and the frequent lack of wind amongst tidal islands; admittedly a worrying combination when you’ve nothing but a scrap of canvas for power and a small anchor for brakes! Consult the charts, tidal guides and sailing directions and don’t be afraid to ask! You will find red “Visitor Mooring” buoys in various locations, these are removed annually over the winter and are well maintained and can cope with boats up to 20 tons (or more in settled weather). -
FOI) the Balfour, Foreland Road, Kirkwall, Orkney KW15 1NZ
Freedom of Information (FOI) The Balfour, Foreland Road, Kirkwall, Orkney KW15 1NZ www.ohb.scot.nhs.uk RE: Freedom of Information Request 202021 / 055 – Falls Data Your Query Date of Request June 2020 1. I would like to request any data you hold on falls from the last 5 years. a) I am looking for the total number of falls sorted by hospital from the last 5 years? b) I am looking for the total number of falls sorted by ward from the last 2 years? 2. I would also like to request all email addresses for ward managers and falls leads/groups within the trust? 3. On average how much does falls cost the trust per year? Clarification Question 2 and 3 are an expansion of question 1. I hope this clarifies for you. In addition please could the data be sorted by the last 5 full calendar years and please include any data that the trust hold for this year too. Response Please be advised that NHS Orkney is a small remote and rural health board which operates one hospital – the Balfour. 1. a) Please note the methodology for measuring falls locally has changed over time. The methodology used for collecting this data is different from previous years. The data provided excludes any falls as a result of ‘assisted lowering’ which were counted in previous years. The total of excluded falls using the new methodology is 4 for 2019 and 3 for 2020. Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Number of 63 82 113 88 103 *42 patient falls recorded *As at 25/06/2020. -
Of Orkn Y 2015 Information and Travel Guide to the Smaller Islands of Orkney
The Islands of ORKN Y 2015 information and travel guide to the smaller islands of Orkney For up to date Orkney information visit www.visitorkney.com • www.orkney.com • www.discover-orkney.com The Islands of ORKN Y Approximate driving times From Kirkwall and Stromness to Ferry Terminals at: • Tingwall 30 mins • Houton 20 mins From Stromness to Kirkwall Airport • 40 mins From Kirkwall to Airport • 10 mins The Islands of looking towards evie and eynhallow from the knowe of yarso on rousay - drew kennedy 1 Contents Contents Out among the isles . 2-5 will be happy to assist you find the most At catching fish I am so speedy economic travel arrangements: A big black scarfie fromEDAY . 6-9 www.visitscotland.com/orkney If you want something with real good looks You can’t go wrong with FLOTTA fleuks . 10-13 There’s not quite such a wondrous thing as a beautiful young GRAEMSAY gosling . 14-17 To take the head off all their big talk Just pay attention to the wise HOY hawk . 14-17 The Countryside Code All stand to the side and reveal Please • close all gates you open. Use From far NORTH RONALDSAY a seal . 18-21 stiles when possible • do not light fires When feeling low or down in the dumps • keep to paths and tracks Just bake some EGILSAY burstin lumps . 22-25 • do not let your dog worry grazing animals You can say what you like, I don’t care • keep mountain bikes on the For I’m a beautiful ROUSAY mare . -
Modern Rune Carving in Northern Scotland. Futhark 8
Modern Rune Carving in Northern Scotland Andrea Freund and Ragnhild Ljosland (University of the Highlands and Islands) Abstract This article discusses modern runic inscriptions from Orkney and Caithness. It presents various examples, some of which were previously considered “genuine”, and reveals that OR 13 Skara Brae is of modern provenance. Other examples from the region can be found both on boulders or in bedrock and in particular on ancient monuments ranging in date from the Neolithic to the Iron Age. The terminology applied to modern rune carving, in particular the term “forgery”, is examined, and the phenomenon is considered in relation to the Ken sington runestone. Comparisons with modern rune carving in Sweden are made and suggestions are presented as to why there is such an abundance of recently carved inscriptions in Northern Scotland. Keywords: Scotland, Orkney, Caithness, modern runic inscriptions, modern rune carving, OR 13 Skara Brae, Kensington runestone Introduction his article concerns runic inscriptions from Orkney and Caithness Tthat were, either demonstrably or arguably, made in the modern period. The objective is twofold: firstly, the authors aim to present an inventory of modern inscriptions currently known to exist in Orkney and Caith ness. Secondly, they intend to discuss the concept of runic “forgery”. The question is when terms such as “fake” or “forgery” are helpful in de scribing a modern runic inscription, and when they are not. Included in the inventory are only those inscriptions which may, at least to an untrained eye, be mistaken for premodern. Runes occurring for example on jewellery, souvenirs, articles of clothing, in logos and the Freund, Andrea, and Ragnhild Ljosland.