DOCSLIB.ORG

Figure 12-1 Analyses of Total Rare Earth Elements, Acme Vs Als Figure 12-2 Analyses of Total Heavy Rare Earth Elements, Acme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Figure 12-1 Analyses of Total Rare Earth Elements, Acme Vs Als Figure 12-2 Analyses of Total Heavy Rare Earth Elements, Acme www.rpacan.com FIGURE 12-1 ANALYSES OF TOTAL RARE EARTH ELEMENTS, ACME VS ALS FIGURE 12-2 ANALYSES OF TOTAL HEAVY RARE EARTH ELEMENTS, ACME VS ALS Avalon Rare Metals Inc. – Thor Lake Project, Project #1714 Technical Report NI 43-101 – August 22, 2011 Rev. 0 Page 12-6 www.rpacan.com TABLE 12-4 COMPARISON OF NIOBIUM, TANTALUM AND ZIRCONIUM ANALYSES Avalon Rare Metals Inc. – Thor Lake Project Standard Lab Method No. Nb (%) Ta (%) Zr (%) STD-L ALS MS81 188 100 99 101 STD-L ALS MS81H 19 101 100 101 STD-L Acme Method 4A 98 103 91 103 STD-L ALS XRF 43 104 73 106 Average (ppm) 1,383 144 9,750 STD-M ALS MS81 153 103 98 66 STD-M ALS MS81H 87 101 96 95 STD-M Acme Method 4A 121 109 90 106 STD-M ALS XRF 46 109 88 115 Average (ppm) 2,196 227 14,087 STD-H ALS MS81 112 100 100 66 STD-H ALS MS81H 99 98 96 111 STD-H Acme Method 4A 224 98 95 111 STD-H ALS XRF 21 98 98 120 Average (ppm) 2,676 301 17,234 STD-H2 ALS MS81 285 96 36 29 STD-H2 ALS MS81H 182 95 124 100 STD-H2 Acme Method 4A 38 93 99 80 STD-H2 ALS XRF 220 94 124 100 Average (ppm) 4,132 313 34,323 Note: Cases with analytical limits removed The results indicate the following: • For the low grade standard (STD-L), all methods (Acme and ALS) give similar results for Nb and Zr, but XRF appears to give anomalously low results for Ta. The cause of this is not known. Standard STD-M is similar. • For higher grade Zr samples (>1%), MS81 does not give correct results due to analysis upper limits, however, for Nb and Ta (with the exception of standard H2/S-04-09) the results are satisfactory. • Except for standard H2/S-04-09, Zr values are 6% to 20% higher with XRF than the average of all analyses from all labs. In addition, XRF10 analyses generally show very low standard deviations. It is concluded that zirconium analyses are systematically higher with XRF, and that these may in fact be more representative of the Zr content of the rock. On the other hand, the Nb and Ta analyses by ICP methods (ALS MS81H and Acme 4A/4B) are all sufficiently close that it is not necessary to conduct additional XRF analyses of these Avalon Rare Metals Inc. – Thor Lake Project, Project #1714 Technical Report NI 43-101 – August 22, 2011 Rev. 0 Page 12-7 www.rpacan.com elements. Given the important of Zr to the overall economics of the deposit, drill core should be routinely analyzed by XRF methods for Zr as otherwise the ZrO2 grade may be systematically understated in resource estimates. Avalon monitors the results of the Company’s internal standards during routine analysis of drill core. Due to the large number of elements involved, being fifteen rare earth elements and three rare metals (Nb, Ta, Zr), it would be impractical to apply a normal logic table of failures where an analysis batch is failed on the basis of issues with one element. In addition, all core is analyzed and so about two-thirds of the samples that have chemical data are not significant in terms of the economics of the deposit. As a result, Avalon followed the following procedure for assessing analytical data: • Batches were not failed if the samples analyzed were clearly far below any economic levels (not mineralized), unless the standards results were very grossly out. • The results of the standards were reviewed to see how many elements were out of acceptable range as recommended in the standard certification, and if four elements were out of range (greater than three standard deviations), but two high and two low, and the remaining 14 elements were in range, the batch was accepted. • If five elements or more elements were out of acceptable range (greater than three standard deviations), and all in the same direction, either biased all high or all low, then the batch was re-analyzed. There were a few cases of blanks being out of acceptable range. However, on close examination of the results, these were almost invariably clearly associated with sample switching, and it was clear that a mineralized sample and the blank had been switched. There was a noticeable reduction in the number of cases of standards being out of range in the case of ALS method MS81H compared to MS81. The overall conclusions of the QA/QC work completed are as follows: • Standard deviations of duplicate analyses on standards indicate that the precision of the laboratories is satisfactory, both for ALS Laboratory and Acme Laboratory. • Duplicate analyses of standards and the duplicate reject analyses indicate that there is little systematic bias between ALS Laboratory and Acme Laboratory. • ALS Laboratory and Acme Laboratory indicate means for the four standards utilized by Avalon within 5% of the accepted values for most rare earth elements, Avalon Rare Metals Inc. – Thor Lake Project, Project #1714 Technical Report NI 43-101 – August 22, 2011 Rev. 0 Page 12-8 www.rpacan.com Nb and Ta. Zr shows more deviation, with ALS MS81H and Acme Method 4A/4B being higher, as are the XRF analyses completed at ALS. • Although there may be systematic differences between ALS and Acme for individual rare earths, in general, the TREE and HREE indicate that this difference is about 1% for TREE and 1.5% for HREE. • Given the general agreement between laboratories on the mean of the standards, and the low standard deviation of duplicate analyses, Avalon considers that the standards are acceptable for QA/QC monitoring of the drill core analyses. • In conclusion, the drill core analyses are considered sufficiently reliable for resource estimation purposes, with the caveat that analyses for Zr require further investigation to establish the cause of the difference between the various methods. • However, Avalon does not consider that the variation in Zr analyses is material to the resource given the low proportion of the total value of Zr relative to all other metals (rare earths, Nb and Ta). SPECIFIC GRAVITY MEASUREMENT A detailed description of the routine used for specific gravity data collection is given in Section 11. INDEPENDENT SAMPLING BY RPA During the April 2011 site visit, RPA personnel collected eight core samples from six diamond drill holes from the 2010 drill program. Six of the samples were from the Basal Zone, and two from the Upper Zone. The core samples consisted of the second half core or quartered core retained by Avalon. The samples were processed at SGS Toronto using the IMS95A and the IMS91B analytical packages. The presence of mineralization was confirmed and the assay results are similar to the original samples. It is the opinion of RPA that Avalon follows the current industry practice, and that the analysis of standards, blanks, and duplicate reject samples show acceptable results. Avalon Rare Metals Inc. – Thor Lake Project, Project #1714 Technical Report NI 43-101 – August 22, 2011 Rev. 0 Page 12-9 www.rpacan.com 13 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING METALLURGICAL TESTING Numerous metallurgical tests have been conducted over the last two years to determine how best to recover the valuable elements from Thor Lake Basal Zone ore. The results of these tests and brief economic trade-off studies have led to the selection of a process including grinding, froth flotation, decomposition of the refractory rare earth, zirconium, and niobium-tantalum minerals and recovery of these elements from solution by solvent extraction and precipitation methods. Metallurgical tests were undertaken on representative samples, both geographically and geologically, of the Upper and Basal Zones of the deposit, prepared in 2008, 2009 and 2010. The samples were developed from multiple drill holes, with composites comprising of numerous samples across the mineralized zones. MINERALOGY The mineralogy of the mineralized material from the Thor Lake Deposit ore has been detailed in Section 9 of this report. The important minerals are zircon, allanite, monazite, fergusonite, bastnaesite, and synchysite. The minerals of interest are fine-grained and typically in the 5 to 25 µm size range. COMMINUTION Five carefully selected composite samples of Upper Zone (UZ) and Basal Zone (BZ) material and waste rock were prepared and submitted to Starkey and Associates for SAG Design testing and to SGS Lakefield Research Limited for assessment of comminution properties. SGS reported a Bond metric rod mill work index value of 16 kWh/t for a UZ sample and values of 14 kWh/t and 16.5 kWh/t for two BZ samples. The values show rock of average toughness according to the SGS database. SGS measured the abrasion indices at 0.3 to 0.4 g indicating moderately abrasive material. Avalon Rare Metals Inc. – Thor Lake Project, Project #1714 Technical Report NI 43-101 – August 22, 2011 Rev. 0 Page 13-1 www.rpacan.com Bond ball mill work index tests returned metric values of about 15 kWh/t for all samples with very little variation when tested using 75 and 106 µm closing screens. Based on the data, Melis Engineering designed a comminution circuit comprising crushing to -15 mm followed by rod and ball milling to achieve the target grind of 80% passing 38 µm. The SAGDesign tests showed that the ore was amenable to semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) and this option may be examined again in future testwork and design studies. FLOTATION Numerous open circuit and locked cycle flotation tests have been done at SGS by Srdjan Bulatovic of SBM Mineral Processing and Engineering Services Ltd.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critical Rare Earths, National Security, and US-China Interactions
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Browse Reports & Bookstore TERRORISM AND Make a charitable contribution HOMELAND SECURITY For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the Pardee RAND Graduate School View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the Pardee RAND Graduate School (PRGS) dissertation series. PRGS dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world’s leading producer of Ph.D.’s in policy analysis. The dissertation has been supervised, reviewed, and approved by the graduate fellow’s faculty committee. Dissertation Critical Rare Earths, National Security, and U.S.-China Interactions A Portfolio Approach to Dysprosium Policy Design David L.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report on the Nechalacho Deposit, Thor Lake Project, Northwest Territories, Canada
    TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE NECHALACHO DEPOSIT, THOR LAKE PROJECT, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, CANADA PREPARED BY AVALON RARE METALS INC. Report for NI 43-101 Authors: Finley Bakker, P. Geo. (BC) Brian Delaney, P. Eng. (Newfoundland and Labrador) Bill Mercer, P Geol. (NWT) Dezhi Qi, P. Eng. (Alberta) Date: March 13, 2011 Document title: Technical Report on the Nechalacho Deposit, Thor Lake Project, Northwest Territories, Canada Authors: Finley Bakker, P.Geo. (BC) Brian Delaney, P. Eng. (Newfoundland and Labrador) Bill Mercer, P. Geol. (NWT ) Dezhi Qi, P. Eng (Alberta) Suite 1901, 130 Adelaide Street West Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3P5 Technical Report 43-101 – March 13, 2011 Page ii Prepared by Avalon Rare Metals Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................1-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................1-1 Introduction ....................................................................................................1-1 Conclusions ...................................................................................................1-1 Current Project Status....................................................................................1-8 Recommendations .........................................................................................1-8 2. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................2-1 RARE EARTH ELEMENTS.................................................................................2-3
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Environmental Assessment and Reasons for Decision EA1011
    Report of Environmental Assessment and Reasons for Decision EA1011-001 Avalon Rare Metals Inc. Nechalacho Rare Earth Element Project July 26, 2013 Executive Summary This report describes the environmental assessment process, summarizes the evidence and sets out the conclusions and decision of the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board (the Review Board) on the Nechalacho Rare Earth Element Project (the Project), an underground rare earth element mine. The developer for this Project is Avalon Rare Metals Inc. (the Developer). The Review Board considered all evidence and information on the public record in reaching its decision according to Section 128 of the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act. The Review Board finds that the Project is likely to cause significant adverse impacts on the environment and has prescribed measures to mitigate adverse environmental impacts from the Project so that they are no longer significant. The Review Board’s decision depends on the implementation of the commitments made by the Developer and the measures set out in this Report of Environmental Assessment (REA). In the Review Board’s opinion, it is therefore important that the Developer, appropriate regulatory authorities and government agencies ensure that the commitments listed in Appendix C and described throughout this document and the measures listed in Appendix A are all fulfilled. Proposed Development The Nechalacho Rare Earth Element Project (the Project) consists of two distinct sites: the Nechalacho mine site, on the North shore of the East Arm of Great Slave Lake, and the Hydrometallurgical plant site at Pine Point, approximately 85 km east of Hay River on the South shore of Great Slave Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Thor Lake – Lake Zone Mineral Resource Update
    Report to: AVALON RARE METALS INC. Thor Lake – Lake Zone Mineral Resource Update Document No. 0851530201-REP-R0002-01 Report to: AVALON RARE METALS INC. THOR LAKE – LAKE ZONE MINERAL RESOURCE UPDATE MARCH 2009 Prepared by “Original document, revision 01, signed Date by Joanne Paul, P.Geo.” March 30, 2009 Joanne Paul, P.Geo. Prepared by: “Original document, revision 01, signed Date by Thomas C. Stubens, P.Eng.” March 30, 2009 Thomas C. Stubens, P.Eng. Reviewed by “Original document, revision 01, signed Date by Gilles Arseneau, P.Geol.” March 30, 2009 Gilles Arseneau, P.Geol. Authorized by “Original document, revision 01, signed Date by Tim Maunula, P.Geo. March 30, 2009 Tim Maunula, P.Geo. 330 Bay Street, Suite 900, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2S8 Phone: 416-368-9080 Fax: 416-368-1963 0851530201-REP-R0002-01 REVISION HISTORY REV. PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY APPROVED BY ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION OF REVISION NO AND DATE AND DATE AND DATE J. Paul/T. Stubens G. Arseneau T. Maunula 00 2009/03/20 First Draft to Client 2009/03/20 2009/03/20 2009/03/20 J. Paul/T. Stubens G. Arseneau T. Maunula 01 2009/03/30 Final Report 2009/03/30 2009/03/30 2009/03/30 0851530201-REP-R0002-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY..................................................................................................................................... VI 1.0 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form for the Year Ended August 31, 2012
    Annual Information Form For the Year Ended August 31, 2012 Dated as of November 28, 2012 Annual Information Form For the year ended August 31, 2012 and dated as of November 28, 2012 Table of Contents 1. PRELIMINARY INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ....................................................................................... 4 1.3. NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 43-101 – QUALIFIED PERSONS ............................................................................................ 5 1.4. CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. INVESTORS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MEASURED, INDICATED AND INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. CORPORATE STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................................ 5 3. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ................................................................................................... 6 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ..................................................................................................................... 9 4.1. GENERAL..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rare Earth Elements Industry in Canada ─ Summary of Evidence
    THE RARE EARTH ELEMENTS INDUSTRY IN CANADA ─ SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE Standing Committee on Natural Resources JUNE 2014 41st PARLIAMENT, SECOND SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare-Earth Elements
    Rare-Earth Elements Chapter O of Critical Mineral Resources of the United States—Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply Professional Paper 1802–O U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Periodic Table of Elements 1A 8A 1 2 hydrogen helium 1.008 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 4.003 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 lithium beryllium boron carbon nitrogen oxygen fluorine neon 6.94 9.012 10.81 12.01 14.01 16.00 19.00 20.18 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 sodium magnesium aluminum silicon phosphorus sulfur chlorine argon 22.99 24.31 3B 4B 5B 6B 7B 8B 11B 12B 26.98 28.09 30.97 32.06 35.45 39.95 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 potassium calcium scandium titanium vanadium chromium manganese iron cobalt nickel copper zinc gallium germanium arsenic selenium bromine krypton 39.10 40.08 44.96 47.88 50.94 52.00 54.94 55.85 58.93 58.69 63.55 65.39 69.72 72.64 74.92 78.96 79.90 83.79 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 rubidium strontium yttrium zirconium niobium molybdenum technetium ruthenium rhodium palladium silver cadmium indium tin antimony tellurium iodine xenon 85.47 87.62 88.91 91.22 92.91 95.96 (98) 101.1 102.9 106.4 107.9 112.4 114.8 118.7 121.8 127.6 126.9 131.3 55 56 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 cesium barium hafnium tantalum tungsten rhenium osmium iridium platinum gold mercury thallium lead bismuth polonium astatine radon 132.9 137.3 178.5 180.9 183.9 186.2 190.2 192.2 195.1 197.0 200.5 204.4 207.2 209.0 (209) (210) (222) 87 88 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Earth Elements Profile
    Rare Earth Elements June 2010 Element Symbol Atomic Atomic Density Melting Vicker’s Definitions, mineralogy and number weight (gcm-3) Point hardness, nt (°C) 10 kg load, deposits kg/mm2 opme Scandium Sc 21 44.95 2.989 1541 85 vel Definitions and characteristics de l The rare earth elements (REE) (sometimes referred to Yttrium Y 39 88.90 4.469 1522 38 ra UK as the rare earth metals) are a group of 17 chemically ne Lanthanum La 57 138.90 6.146 918 37 mi similar metallic elements, including scandium, yttrium e bl and the lanthanides. The lanthanides are elements Cerium Ce 58 140.11 8.160 798 24 na ai spanning atomic numbers 57 to 71 (Table 1). They all Praseodymium Pr 59 140.90 6.773 931 37 st occur in nature, although promethium1, the rarest, only su r occurs in trace quantities in natural materials as it has no Neodymium Nd 60 144.24 7.008 1021 35 f o re long-lived or stable isotopes (Castor and Hedrick, 2006). Promethium1 Pm 61 145.00 7.264 1042 - nt Scandium and yttrium are considered REE as they have Ce Minerals similar chemical and physical properties. Separation of Samarium Sm 62 150.36 7.520 1074 45 the individual REE was a difficult challenge for chemists Europium Eu 63 151.96 5.244 822 17 in the 18th and 19th centuries, such that it was not until Gadolinium Gd 64 157.25 7.901 1313 57 the 20th century that they were all identified. Because of their chemical similarity the REE, can very easily Terbium Tb 65 158.92 8.230 1356 46 substitute for one another making refinement to pure Dysprosium Dy 66 162.50 8.551 1412 42 metal difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Avalon Rare Metals Inc. (OTCQX: AVARF, TSX: AVL) VIRIATHUS®
    Informational Report Shandong LuoxinBasic Pharmacy Materials (OTCQX: – Rare SLUXY Metals) VIRIATHUS | RESE Equity | Canada September 14, 2010 Avalon Rare Metals Inc. (OTCQX: AVARF, TSX: AVL) VIRIATHUS® Patrick Murphy, CFA +1 212 461 2230 Research Analyst [email protected] Company Description: Avalon Rare Metals Inc. is exploring for and developing rare metals deposits in Canada. Its flagship project, the 100%-owned Nechalacho Deposit, located at Thor Lake in Canada’s Northwest Territories, ranks as the world’s largest undeveloped rare earth elements (REE) resource outside of China. The Nechalacho Deposit has Financial Data (USD): exceptional enrichment in valuable ‘heavy’ rare earth elements (“HREE”), increasingly in demand for solar thin films, high strength magnets, wind turbines, Share Price: .……………………………….........................3.52 LED lighting, rechargeable batteries and other green energy applications. Market Capitalization (mln): …….……...........................280.0 Nechalacho is one of the few significant REE sources outside of China, which Shares Outstanding (mln): ………......................................79.1 currently controls 95% of world REE supply but is steadily reducing amounts Float (mln): ………….……………..……..............................NA available for export – by 40% over the past seven years, according to the Journal of Average Volume (90 Day approx.): .……….................122,928 Energy Security. Avalon recently updated its resource estimates for the Basal and 52 Week Range: …………………..……....................$1.09-3.90 Upper Zones of the Nechalacho deposit by 100% to 2.5 million tonnes of contained Exchange: ...………………...……...…………OTCQX & TSX TREO (Total Rare Earth Oxides) and probable reserves of 12 million tonnes at 170% TREO. Avalon has completed a Prefeasibility Study confirming positive economics for the project and has also successfully developed flotation and metallurgical processes for producing an REE mineral concentrate then upgrading it into a chemical concentrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report on the Thor Lake Project, Northwest Territories, Canada
    Scott Wilson Mining AVALON RARE METALS INC. TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE THOR LAKE PROJECT, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, CANADA NI 43-101 Report Authors: Jason J. Cox, P.Eng. Christopher Moreton, Ph.D., P.Geo. John R. Goode, P.Eng. Donald H. Hains, P.Geo. July 29, 2010 SCOTT WILSON ROSCOE POSTLE ASSOCIATES INC. Report Control Form Document Title Technical Report On The Thor Lake Project, Northwest Territories, Canada Client Name & Address Avalon Rare Metals Inc. Suite 1901 - 130 Adelaide Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 3P5 Document Reference Status & Draft Project # 1384 Issue No. Version Issue Date Lead Author Jason J. Cox (signature & date) Peer Reviewer Richard J. Lambert (name) (signature & date) Project Manager Approval Jason J. Cox (name) (signature & date) Project Director Approval (name) (signature & date)) Report Distribution Name No. of Copies Client Scott Wilson RPA Filing 1 (project box) 1 (project file) Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. 55 University Avenue, Suite 501 Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Canada Tel: +1 416 947 0907 Fax: +1 416 947 0395 [email protected] SCOTT WILSON RPA www.scottwilson.com TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 1-1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 1-1 Technical Summary ............................................................................................... 1-15 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of REE Minerals by QEMSCAN from Nechalacho Deposit, Thor Lake, NWT, Canada
    SGS MINERALS SERVICES TECHNICAL PAPER 2011-07 2011 QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE REE MINERALS BY QEMSCAN FROM THE NECHALACHO HEAVY RARE EARTH DEPOSIT, THOR LAKE PROJECT, NWT, CANADA TASSOS GRAMMATIKOPOULOS – SGS; WILLIAM MERCER – AVALON RARE METALS INC.; CHRIS GUNNING - SGS; SARAH PROUT - SGS ABSTRACT The Nechalacho rare metal deposit is located in NWT, Canada. Avalon Rare Metals Inc. is now evaluating processing techniques for recovery of REE to be used in the industry. QEMSCAN® analysis coupled with whole rock, REE, Zr and Nb, and electron microprobe analyses were utilized to identify and quantify the mineralogy of the deposit, and define the REE distribution among minerals. QEMSCAN® mineralogy was performed on fifty intact drill samples using EXPLOMIN™ that provided textural information for the mineralization; crushed samples were used to determine the variability of the ore and define REE domains, and composite samples to determine the liberation and association of the REE minerals. The sample matrix predominantly consists of biotite, feldspars, quartz, muscovite/clays, minor chlorite and amphibole, magnetite and hematite and carbonates. REE include in decreasing order of abundance allanite (3.6%), monazite (1.5%), synchysite (0.9%), columbite (0.9%), fergusonite (0.6%), bastnaesite (0.4%), and zircon (11.0%). The majority of the HREE are carried by fergusonite and zircon, and the LREE by monazite, allanite, synchysite and bastnaesite. QEMSCAN® mineralogical data is extremely valuable in assessing the mineralogy of the ore. The data have been implemented in defining the mineralogy of the ore body, support metallurgical testwork, predict recoveries and grades, and finally calculate reserves of the deposit.
    [Show full text]
  • View Board, Expected Increments
    Due Diligence and Valuation Report Arrowhead Code: 21-01-18 Company: AVALON RARE METALS, INC. Coverage initiated: 25 Aug 2008 This document: 31 August 2012 Ticker: TSX: AVL; AMEX: AVL; FWB:OU5 Fair share value bracket: CA$4.48 to CA$13.44i Headquarters: Toronto, Ontario Share price on date: CA$1.72ii CEO & President: Mr. Don Bubar Analyst team Non-Executive Chairman: Mr. Alan Ferry Vishal Pasari Mohanarangam Purushothaman Website: www.avalonraremetals.com [email protected] [email protected] Part of the ABID TREO. In addition, it bought the one of the two NSR royalties, of 3%, for a cash payment of ESR Index CA$2.0MM. Market Data An update to the PFS, released in 2011, shows 52-Week Range: CA$1.40 – CA$4.25iii the pre-tax internal rate of return (IRR) of 39% Average Daily Volume: 324,760iv and pre-tax NPV of 10% at CA$1.77B. A Market Cap. on date: CA$178.21MM CA$64MM feasibility study (FS) for the project is ongoing and is expected to be completed by 2Q Financial Forecast Data (in CA$) 2013. The production is expected to start in 2016 ‘12E ‘13E ‘14E ‘15E 16E ‘17E ‘18E with its initial sales in 2017, at a total capital High profit/ expenditure of approximately $1.2B, including the (8.0) (10.0) (11.0) (18.2) (44.4) 22.6 124.2 (loss) MM US based separation plant. High EPS (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.3) 0.1 0.6 Warren Township is a high potential Calcium CA$ Low profit/ Feldspar Project with high purity anorthosite with (8.0) (10.0) (11.0) (18.2) (44.4) 108.4 246.2 (loss) MM 98% calcium plagioclase feldspar.
    [Show full text]