Schiavo Revisited? the Trs Uggle for Autonomy at the End of Life in Italy Kathy L

Copy Link

Marqueꢀe Elder's Advisor

Volume 12

Issue 2 Spring

Article 3

Schiavo Revisited? e Struggle for Autonomy at the End of Life in Italy

Kathy L. Cerminara

Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad Law Center

Federico Gustavo Pizzeꢀi

University of Milan, Italy

Watcharin H. Photangtham

Follow this and additional works at: hꢀp://scholarship.law.marqueꢀe.edu/elders
Part of the Elder Law Commons

Repository Citation

Cerminara, Kathy L.; Pizzeꢀi, Federico Gustavo; and Photangtham, Watcharin H. (2011) "Schiavo Revisited? e Struggle for Autonomy at the End of Life in Italy," Marqueꢀe Elder's Advisor: Vol. 12: Iss. 2, Article 3.

Available at: hꢀp://scholarship.law.marqueꢀe.edu/elders/vol12/iss2/3

is Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marqueꢀe Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marqueꢀe Elder's Advisor by an authorized administrator of Marqueꢀe Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact

megan.obrien@marqueꢀe.edu.

Recommended publications

Introduction Analysis

AYEH, TEXAS LAW OBSTRUCTS PREGNANT MOTHER’S RIGHT TO DIE, VOICES IN BIOETHICS, VOL. 1 (2014-15) Texas Law Obstructs Pregnant Mother’s Right to Die Derek Ayeh* Keywords: bioethics, ethics, abortion, Texas INTRODUCTION By now the legitimacy of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders are acknowledged by everyone – if a patient presents an advanced directive or their family members agree as to what the patient’s wishes were for end- of-life care, then life-sustaining treatments can be withdrawn or withheld. However, a Texas law is preventing a pregnant woman from exercising the choice to not be resuscitated. ANALYSIS The woman, Marlise Munoz, was found unconscious in late November and since then has not regained consciousness. However, the fetus she carries continues to have a beating heart and there is a Texas state law that puts the rights of a fetus over the wishes of its mother. Her husband, Erik Munoz, along with her parents all agreed that it would have been against Marlise’s wishes to be kept on life support. Already we can see how different this case is from the Terri Schiavo case between husband and parents. Instead this case is between the Marlise family and the John Peter Smith Hospital in Fort Worth. It’s easy to see how this case could slip into questions of pro-life versus pro-choice. This issue pits the mother’s choices against the ‘best interests’ of the fetus (or at least, what certain groups interpret as the fetus’s best interests). However, a best interests stance is not straightforward in this case either.
$Resolving Disputes Over Life-Sustaining Treatment \I$

Resolving Disputes Over Life-Sustaining Treatment \I

.. ..: 4 .. NCSC HF 38-27 E87 M Y \\Resolving Disputes Over C,3 Life-Sustaining Treatment \I A Health Care Provider's Guide Thomas L. Hafemeister ani Paula L. Hannaford Wth the Greenwall Coordinating Council National Center for State Courts library National Center for State Courts 300 Newport Ave. WJliamsburg, VA 23 187-8798 0 1996 National Center for State Courts Williamsburg, Virginia Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 96-70341 ISBN 0-89656-167-4 NCSC Publication Number R- 186 Cover design by Judith Ann Sullivan Images 0 1996 PhotoDisc, Inc. This book was prepared under a grant from the Greenwall Foundation. The points of view expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policy of the National Center for State Courts or the Greenwall Foundation, or the opinions of the Greenwall Review Panel members. Comments are welcome and should be sent to the Greenwall Project, National Center for State Courts, 300 Newport Avenue (231851,PO. Box 8798, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8798. Greenwall Coordinating Council Hon. Stewart G. Pollock, Chair New Jersey Supreme Court Morristown, New Jersey Hon. Elizabeth B. Lacy, Vice-Chair Virginia Supreme Court Richmond, Virginia Hon. Robert C. Bibb (ret.) Alexander M. Capron, J.D. Deno, Millikan, Dale & Decker Professor of Law & Medicine Everett, Washington University of Southern California Law Center hsAngeles, California Ellen B. Comer, Esq. Ronald E. Cranford, M.D. Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish & Kauffman Department of Neurology Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Hennepin County Medical Center Minneapolis, Minnesota Norman Fost, M.D., M.P.H. Hon. Hilda R. Gage Professor Chief Judge, Michigan Circuit Court Pediatrics & History of Medicine Pontiac, Michigan Director, Program in Medical Ethics University of Wisconsin Medical School Joan McIver Gibson, Ph.D.
The Court Upholds a State Law Prohibiting Physician-Assisted Suicide

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 88 Article 3 Issue 3 Spring Spring 1998 The ourC t Upholds A State Law Prohibiting Physician-Assisted Suicide Brett einbF erg Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Brett einbeF rg, The ourC t Upholds A State Law Prohibiting Physician-Assisted Suicide, 88 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 847 (Spring 1998) This Supreme Court Review is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/98/8803-0847 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINALLAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 88, No. 3 Copyrght © 1998 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printed in U.S.A. THE COURT UPHOLDS A STATE LAW PROHIBITING PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE Vacco v. Quill, 117 S. Ct. 2293 (1997) I. INTRODUCTION In Vacco v. Quill,' the United States Supreme Court ad- dressed whether a terminally ill person has a constitutionally protected right to commit suicide with the assistance of a physi- cian.2 The Court held that state laws prohibiting physician- assisted suicide are constitutionally permissible since they do not violate the Equal Protection Clause.3 In making its decision, the Court determined that the right to die with assistance is not a fundamental right.4 The Court
Evolution of the Law Affecting End-Of-Life Planning

TRUSTS & ESTATES ARTICLE JANUARY 2008 The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly: Evolution of the Law kAffecting End-of-Life Planning By Graham D. Holding, Christy Eve Reid & Susan I. McCrory Over the last thirty years there have been significant changes to end-of-life-planning. The changes were initiated as a result of “ugly” scenes played out on national television when grieving families were forced to sue health care providers in order to withdraw life-support systems from family members whose medical conditions would never improve. As a result of these lawsuits, Health Care Power of Attorney and Declaration of a Desire for a Natural Death (“Living Will”) statutes were enacted that recognized an individual’s right to control medical decisions, even when the individual lacked the ability to make or communicate those decisions. In 2007 substantial changes were made in North Carolina’s statutory Health Care Power of Attorney form as well as the statutory Living Will form. Although many improvements were made in North Carolina’s statutory forms, for the reasons expressed below we have decided to recommend that, in lieu of the new statutory forms, our clients execute an alternative form that we have drafted combining the health care power of attorney and living will provisions. This alternative combined form appears in the 2007 supplement to the BB&T ESTATE PLANNING FORMS MANUAL and as a PDF document on the Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson website, www.rbh.com, that can be downloaded from the MenuForms page . Historical Background Historically, the presumption in the law favored the continuance of life under all circumstances.
La Necessità Di Diritti Infelici. Il Diritto Di Morire Come Limite All’Intervento Penale(*)

LA NECESSITÀ DI DIRITTI INFELICI. IL DIRITTO DI MORIRE COME LIMITE ALL’INTERVENTO PENALE(*) di Massimo Donini Lasciar morire una persona in un modo che altri approvano, ma che essa considera in orribile contraddizione con la sua vita, è una forma di tirannia odiosa e distruttiva. Ronald Dworkin1 Abstract. Lo studio mette in chiaro che la situazione del malato in condizioni irreversibili e di crudele sofferenza per malattie incurabili, resa possibile dalla stessa medicina che consente un prolungamento della vita straordinario, ma anche artificiale o innaturale, è diversa da quella di qualsiasi altro soggetto che viene protetto dalle norme a tutela della vita. Nel rifiuto delle cure, riconosciuto a livello internazionale come diritto pieno anche quando il suo esercizio conduca a morire dopo pochi minuti, è contenuto già il riconoscimento del diritto di morire. Nel caso Englaro (come in quelli Cruzan, Schiavo, Bland e Lambert) quel diritto è stato addirittura riconosciuto attraverso un terzo, per realizzare un omicidio doloso e non “del consenziente”. La costruzione di diritti infelici come diritti fondamentali del malato non può essere lasciata al solo diritto giurisprudenziale, anche se grazie a esso sono nati come diritti che già ora limitano le incriminazioni (aiuto al suicidio, omicidio del consenziente, omicidio). La comparazione con gli ordinamenti tedesco, svizzero, olandese, belga, offre un ventaglio di esperienze diverse orientate alla compassione e non all’indifferenza rispetto all’autonomia e alle sofferenze di malati che non sono suscettibili o desiderosi di sole cure palliative. Essa aiuta anche a comprendere la relatività della distinzione tra agire e omettere e tra condotta di autore e di partecipe in queste situazioni scriminate di aiuto a morire e non solo nel morire.
Challenges & Lessons from the Terri Schiavo Case

Article Challenges & Lessons from the Terri Schiavo Case Challenges & Lessons from the Terri Schiavo Case Hessel Bouma III In 1990, Terri Schiavo suffered severe brain injury yet lived fifteen years in a vegetative state dependent upon artificial hydration and nutrition. For more than seven years, Terri’s husband and her family contested her condition, prognosis, and whether to withhold or continue her medical care through the court system, media, communities of faith, and the legislative and executive branches of the state and federal governments. An examination of medical, moral, religious, and legal aspects of withholding or withdrawing artificial hydration and nutrition suggests the judiciary branch acted responsibly in this tragic case. The Schiavo case challenges us to support more research into severe brain injuries, to prepare our Advance Directives appointing surrogate decision-makers and leaving clear and convincing evidence of our wishes should we be incapacitated, to affirm the lives and choices of persons with disabilities, and to 1 Hessel Bouma III address issues of fairness and justice in the allocations of medical technologies. he 1960s and 1970s saw a rapid rise in far out in front of carefully considered bio- Tbiomedical technologies including ethical responses, public policy, and legal Under what cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiac decisions. Foremost among the many vexing by-pass machines, ventilators, and organ questions was, ”Under what circumstances, circumstances, transplantation. Dr. Lewis Thomas perceived
An Option in Modern Health Care Decision Making

Copyright © 2013 Ave Maria Law Review “THEY WANT ME DEAD”—ACTIVE KILLING— AN OPTION IN MODERN HEALTH CARE DECISION MAKING Rebekah C. Millard, Life Legal Defense Foundation INTRODUCTION “Thousands of medical ethicists and bioethicists, as they are called, professionally guide the unthinkable on its passage through the debatable on its way to becoming the justifiable until it is finally established as the unexceptional.”1 According to the published statements of British medical practitioners in June of 2012, more than 100,000 patients each year are put on a “death pathway” protocol by their doctors, thereby hastening their deaths.2 The death pathway is invoked for a variety of reasons, including the difficulty of the treatment involved, or to free up additional beds in overcrowded health care facilities. The protocol can include withdrawal of treatment—including water and nourishment—and usually results in death within thirty-three hours. Observers were not slow to equate the use of this protocol to euthanasia, which although legal in some jurisdictions,3 remains 4 illegal in the United Kingdom. J.D. Oakbrook College of Law and Government Policy, 2008; staff counsel for the Life Legal Defense Foundation, a non-profit, public interest law firm with the mission of giving innocent and helpless human beings of any age a trained and committed defense against the threat of death and to support their advocates in the nation’s courtrooms. Many thanks to Ave Maria School of Law student Joan Hetzler for her research assistance, and to my colleagues at Life Legal for their input, help, and encouragement.
$C:\Documents and Settings\Dcureton\Local Settings$

C:\Documents and Settings\Dcureton\Local Settings

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED DEATH Professor Valerie J. Vollmar Willamette University College of Law Copyright 2007 *NOTE: The title of this report uses the term “physician-assisted death” instead of “physician-assisted suicide” for the first time. The reasons for this change are described below under “National Developments.” The report continues to use the term “physician-assisted suicide” when that term appears in the original source. The address and title of this website remain unchanged for ease in accessing the site. LEGISLATION Arizona Physician-assisted suicide and advance directive to control suffering. In January 2007, Representative Linda Lopez and eight other Democrats introduced HB 2572, which is similar to the Oregon Death with Dignity Act. On the same date, they also introduced HB 2357, which would amend Arizona’s advance directive statutes so that a person could indicate a desire to control suffering in the event of terminal illness by obtaining a prescription for lethal medication; the advance directive would have to be executed at least three months before the person requests a prescription. As was the case with comparable legislation introduced in 2005 and 2006, the bills have not advanced in the legislature. Million Geezer March. On 1/24/07, Representative Lopez joined other supporters of the proposed legislation in demonstrating outside the state capitol in Phoenix. California Bill introduced. On 2/15/07, Assemblywoman Patty Berg, Assemblymen Lloyd Levine, and Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez introduced AB 374 (the California Compassionate Choices Act) in the California legislature. Twenty-four other members of the legislature co-authored the bill, which was patterned after the Oregon Death with Dignity Act but requires a mental health evaluation by a psychiatrist or psychologist if the patient is not in hospice care.
THE CASE of ELUANA ENGLARO Constitutional Court Translation by Rebecca Spitzmiller and Silvia Deconca HOLDINGS: on the Matter Of

THE CASE OF ELUANA ENGLARO Constitutional Court Translation by Rebecca Spitzmiller and Silvia DeConca HOLDINGS: On the matter of euthanasia, regarding the case of Eluana, no conflict between the powers of the State emerges from the decisions taken by the judges; they did not use such decisions as mere formal shields to instead exercise legislative functions or to diminish Parliament’s legislative power, which remains its holder. See Court of Appeals of Milan 9/7/08 Corte d’Appello di Milano 9.7.2008. (source: Altalex Massimario 34/2008) Altalex Massimario 34/2008)----- FULL TEXT Constitutional Court Order 8 October 2008 number 334 THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT composed of the Honourable: - Franco BILE President - Giovanni Maria FLICK Judge - Francesco AMIRANTE “ - Ugo DE SIERVO “ - Paolo MADDALENA “ - Alfio FINOCCHIARO “ - Alfonso QUARANTA “ - Franco GALLO “ - Luigi MAZZELLA “ - Gaetano SILVESTRI “ - Sabino CASSESE “ - Maria Rita SAULLE “ - Giuseppe TESAURO “ - Paolo Maria NAPOLITANO “ pronounced the following ORDER: in the controversies over the attribution of State powers that arose following the decision of the Court of Cassation no. 21748 of 16 October 2007 and the decree of the Court of Appeals of Milan of 25 June 2008, brought on petitions by the Chamber of Deputies and by the Senate of the Republic filed in the office of the clerk’s court on 17 September 2008 and registered with numbers 16 and 17 in the case registry of conflicts between powers of the State 2008, admissibility stage. Heard in the council chamber by Hon. Judge Speaker Ugo De Siervo on 8 October 2008. Considering that with the petition filed on 17 September 2008 (regulation of conflict of administrative powers no.
Programa De Pós Graduação Em Bioética, Ética Aplicada E Saúde Coletiva - Ppgbios

PROGRAMA DE PÓS GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOÉTICA, ÉTICA APLICADA E SAÚDE COLETIVA - PPGBIOS RENATA DA SILVA FONTES MONTEIRO Diretivas Antecipadas de Vontade: o uso de narrativas para possibilitar o exercício da autonomia do paciente Niterói 2018 Renata da Silva Fontes Monteiro Diretivas Antecipadas de Vontade: o uso de narrativas para possibilitar o exercício da autonomia do paciente Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Bioética, Ética Aplicada e Saúde Coletiva, programa interinstitucional da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal Fluminense, e como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Doutor. Área de concentração: Bioética e Saúde Coletiva Orientador: Prof. Dr. Aluísio Gomes da Silva Junior Niterói 2018 Ficha catalográfica automática - SDC/BFM M772d Monteiro, Renata da Silva Fontes Diretivas Antecipadas de Vontade: o uso de narrativas para possibilitar o exercício da autonomia do paciente / Renata da Silva Fontes Monteiro; Aluísio Gomes da Silva Junior, orientador. Niterói, 2018. 168 f.: il. Tese (doutorado)-Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22409/PPGCM.2018.d.88730719704 1. Diretivas Antecipadas de Vontade. 2. Bioetica. 3. Autonomia. 4. Narrativas. 5. Produção intelectual. I. Título II. Silva Junior,Aluísio Gomes da, orientador. III. Universidade Federal Fluminense. Faculdade de Medicina. CDD Bibliotecária responsável: Danúzia da Rocha de Paula - CRB7/4046 RENATA DA SILVA FONTES MONTEIRO Diretivas Antecipadas de Vontade: o uso de narrativas para possibilitar o exercício da autonomia do paciente Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Bioética, Ética Aplicada e Saúde Coletiva, programa interinstitucional da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro e Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Doutor.
Edición Impresa

Deportes Página 14 CANNAVARO GASOL TROPIEZO DEL Personifica la Se recupera y BARÇA crisis del Madrid anotó 16 puntos Igualó en casa frente al tras el fiasco aunque no ganó Atlético,que regresa así a la Champions. frente al Recre a los Spurs Llega el primer sorteo feminista del gordo La mayoría de los premios los cantarán las niñas. Cada uno nos jugamos de El primer diario que no se vende media esta Navidad 61,6 euros. Al Estado ya le han tocado unos 660 millones. vestuario nuevo, más informal. 6 Viernes 22 Los niños de San Ildefonso estrenan DICIEMBRE DE 2006. AÑO VII. NÚMERO 1608 Síguelo en directo y comprueba al Abre el aparcamiento de La Victoria con capacidad para 438 vehículos y 71 bicis instante si te ha Justo a la entrada del centro, cobra por minutos. tocado algo en La primera hora costará un total de 1,35 euros. 3 20minutos.es 22 escuelas en toda la provincia estarán abiertas durante las Navidades Seis de ellos en la capital. Ofrecen talleres y acti- vidades deportivas en horario de mañana. 3 El Colegio de Médicos acredita a 23 doctores para prácticas estéticas No es un título de ejercicio, pero sí un certificado de formación y capacidad para la medicina estética. 2 tutiplán ROLDAN SERRANO UNO DE ELLOS PUEDE CANTAR EL GORDO. El calvo de 20minutos.es, ayer con Pedro Vázquez, subdirector de San Ildefonso, y con 16 niños y niñas de los Villancicos con 36queparticipanenelsorteo:Ainhoa,Eliana,Raúl,Fernando,Andrea,Tamara,Miriam,Valeria,María,Claudia,Lucía,Rosemary,Sandra,Manel,VanessayBryan.
Assisted Suicide: Article 17 of the Italian Code of Medical Ethics Follows in the Footsteps of the Italian Constitutional Court’S Landmark Ruling

European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2020; 24: 10309-10312 Assisted suicide: article 17 of the Italian Code of Medical Ethics follows in the footsteps of the Italian Constitutional Court’s landmark ruling Dear Editor, Less than a year ago, on September 25th 2019, the Italian Constitutional Court issued a land- mark decision on assistance in dying, thus setting a long-awaited standard in terms of regulating assisted suicide1. The ruling related to the case of Fabiano Antoniani, also known as DJ Fabo, a man in his forties who had made a pondered, steadfast decision to receive assistance in dying at a Swiss euthanasia clinic in 2017. Fabiano was left blind and tetraplegic in the aftermath of a catastrophic road accident in 2014. His death has since become the subject of heated debate in a country, such as Italy, where euthanasia, whether active (i.e., doctors actively causing the patient’s death) or passive (the self-administration by the patient of lethal drugs to end his or her life, the way Fabiano ended his), is adamantly opposed by the Catholic Church. Italy’s Constitutional Court has made it clear that euthanasia should be permitted by law in certain circumstances, including those in which a patient’s irreversible condition was “causing physical and psychological suffering that he or she considers intolerable”. The court’s ruling was centered around assisted dying and the “legal framework concerning end of life [situations]”. A request had in fact been made by a Milan court to provide a clear interpretation of the law in the trial against pro-euthanasia politician, activist and campaigner Marco Cappato, who had actively helped Antoniani with his journey to a Swiss clinic which pro- vides assisted suicide.