NSP Architectural Services Agreement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NSP Architectural Services Agreement AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR ATLANTA NEW STADIUM PROJECT Between and Among GEO. L SMITH II GEORGIA WORLD CONGRESS CENTER AUTHORITY as Owner ATLANTA FALCONS STADIUM COMPANY, LLC as Developer and 360 ARCHITECTURE INC as Architect Effective Date: As of April 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ..........................................................1 SECTION 2 CERTAIN DEFINITIONS ..............................................................................2 SECTION 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS REGARDING ARCHITECT’S RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................................................11 3.1 Representations of Architect .....................................................................................11 3.2 Status of Architect......................................................................................................12 3.3 The Services Generally ..............................................................................................12 3.4 Standard of Care for Architect and its Subconsultants .........................................12 3.5 Conflicts of Interest....................................................................................................12 3.6 Certifications and Licenses .......................................................................................13 3.7 Compliance with Applicable Laws, League Rules, Applicable Codes and Standards and Utility Requirements ..................................................................13 3.8 Time Schedule; Time of the Essence ........................................................................13 3.9 Key Persons; Staffing by Architect ..........................................................................14 3.10 Separate Permit Packages and Phased Occupancy ................................................15 3.11 Subconsultants............................................................................................................16 3.12 Architect’s Representative ........................................................................................19 3.13 Coordination by Architect with Others Involved in the Project ...........................19 3.14 Other Work of Architect ...........................................................................................19 3.15 Record Keeping by Architect and Subconsultants .................................................19 3.16 Equal Employment Opportunity; Nondiscrimination ...........................................20 3.17 Correction of Errors, Inconsistencies and Deficiencies ..........................................21 3.18 Computer-Aided Drafting and Design and Building Information Modeling ...............................................................................................................21 3.19 Submittals ...................................................................................................................22 i 3.20 Compliance with Employment Laws .......................................................................22 SECTION 4 PRELIMINARY SERVICES .......................................................................22 4.1 Preliminary Services Phase .......................................................................................22 SECTION 5 BASIC SERVICES ........................................................................................23 5.1 Schematic Design Phase ............................................................................................24 5.2 Design Development Phase........................................................................................28 5.3 Construction Documents Phase/Bid and Award Phase ..........................................33 5.4 Construction Phase ....................................................................................................36 5.5 Post-Construction Phase ...........................................................................................40 SECTION 6 ARCHITECT ADDITIONAL SERVICE REQUESTS AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES ..................................................................................................42 6.1 Architect Additional Service Requests.....................................................................42 6.2 Timing Requirements for Notifications of Architect Additional Service Requests ................................................................................................................42 6.3 Enumeration of Additional Services ........................................................................43 6.4 Time for Performance of Additional Services .........................................................44 SECTION 7 DEVELOPER’S RESPONSIBILITIES; ADDITIONAL RIGHTS OF DEVELOPER .........................................................................................................................45 7.1 Developer’s Responsibilities ......................................................................................45 7.2 Additional Rights of Developer ................................................................................45 SECTION 8 ARCHITECT’S COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT .............................47 8.1 Fixed Fees for Preliminary Services and Basic Services ........................................47 8.2 Architect’s Compensation for Additional Services .................................................47 8.3 Payments to Architect................................................................................................47 8.4 Payments to Subconsultants......................................................................................49 8.5 Construction Funds Disbursement Procedures ......................................................49 ii 8.6 Payment or Approval Not Acceptance of Services .................................................49 8.7 Payments Withheld. ...................................................................................................49 8.8 Payment Disputes .......................................................................................................50 8.9 Payment Error ...........................................................................................................50 8.10 Currency .....................................................................................................................50 8.11 Interest on Late Payments.........................................................................................51 SECTION 9 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES ...................................................................51 9.1 Generally .....................................................................................................................51 9.2 Enumeration of Reimbursable Expenses ................................................................51 9.3 Enumeration of Additional Services Reimbursable Expenses...............................52 SECTION 10 OWNERSHIP AND USE OF WORK PRODUCT .....................................53 10.1 Work Product .............................................................................................................53 10.2 Architect’s Intellectual Property ..............................................................................53 10.3 Return of Work Product ...........................................................................................53 10.4 Restricted Use of Work Product ...............................................................................53 SECTION 11 INSURANCE AND ASSUMPTION OF RISK ...........................................53 11.1 Architect’s Policies and Limits .................................................................................54 11.2 Developer’s Insurance ...............................................................................................55 11.3 Evidence of Insurance; Other Policy Requirements ...............................................55 11.4 Project Specific Professional Liability Insurance Policy ........................................56 11.5 Assumption of Risk ....................................................................................................56 11.6 Deductibles..................................................................................................................56 11.7 Limitation of Liability ...............................................................................................56 11.8 Failure to Provide Insurance ....................................................................................56 11.9 Miscellaneous..............................................................................................................57 iii SECTION 12 INDEMNIFICATION ...................................................................................57 12.1 General Indemnification ...........................................................................................57 12.2 Patent and Copyright Indemnification ....................................................................58 12.3 Lien Indemnification .................................................................................................58 12.4 Legal Defense ..............................................................................................................59 12.5 Enforceability .............................................................................................................60 SECTION 13 DISPUTE RESOLUTION.............................................................................60
Recommended publications
  • Aia Columbus Newsletter Osu Football Tickets Silent
    9/9/2014 Design Matters - AIA Columbus Newsletter August 28, 2014 AIA COLUMBUS NEWSLETTER August 28, 2014 AIA Columbus would like to OSU FOOTBALL TICKETS SILENT AUCTION thank the following sponsors for their continued support of the Chapter: AIA Columbus is auctioning off a pair of tickets for three different OSU home football games!! To place a bid, email [email protected]. Bids must be Affiliate Members in $50 increments. AJ Schmitt Fine Home Building Seat Location: Section 26A, Row 23, Barber & Hoffman, Inc. Seats 17 & 18 Big Ass Solutions BlairIT Virginia Tech: September 6, 2014 - Campanella Associates Opening Bid $220 Continental Office DesignPro Insurance Group Cincinnati: September 27, 2014 - DHDC Engineering Opening Bid $160 DIRTT Ecostratum Michigan: November 29, 2014 - Elford, Inc. Opening Bid $300 Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. Hamilton Parker More Information Jezerinac Geers & Associates Korda Live! Technologies LLC DESIGN TALKS Messer Construction Co. Mock Woodworking Multi-Family Housing Trends Paul J. Ford and Co. September 4, 2014 Pella Windows Pepper Construction Schaefer The presentation will cover the trends affecting the present boom in multi-family SMBH housing development in Columbus, and the impacts of these developments on Snyder Brick and Block overall urban development patterns, local economies, and resident lifestyles. Tec Studio In particular, we will examine nascent trends that distinguish multi-family The Garland Company housing today from that of twenty years ago. Turner Construction V&S Columbus Galvanizing Weaver Commercial The Center for Architecture & Design Contractor Inc. 50 West Town Street, Suite 110 Woodright Forest Products Columbus, OH 43215 12:00 - 1:00 PM *Contact Gwen Berlekamp for information about Free for all to attend.
    [Show full text]
  • Thornton Tomasetti
    sports “ In terms of creativity … one should take an attitude not that architects and engineers sit on different mounds taking care of their respective problems, but rather that it is one complementary group working together in creating a building.” – Dr. Lev Zetlin sports On the cover: In 1958, Lev Zetlin – founder of the firm that became Thornton Tomasetti – developed a visionary design for “Tomorrow’s Arena” that was discussed in Engineering News Record, Time and This Week magazines and in the New York Herald Tribune. With a capacity of 200,000, the innovative concept features a suspension-tensioned translucent roof and multi-deck parking ramps integrated into the underside of a concrete stadium bowl, close to the stands. It minimizes the use of land and material while enhancing the spectator experience. In 2013, our computational designers used Rhino Grasshopper and Karamba to create an interactive parametric model of the design. Today, Thornton Tomasetti continues to design sports facilities in the creative spirit Contents of Lev Zetlin. We apply groundbreaking technological tools in innovative ways to help clients and project partners make the future of sports design a reality. Image Credit: Drawing by Fred Freeman, based on a design by Dr. Lev Zetlin, P.E., and published by This Week magazine. We Bring the Whole Team 2 Unmatched Experience 5 Revolutionizing Design Through Technology 7 Integrated Support Across the Building Life Cycle 14 Game On! 28 Projects 29 We Bring the Whole Team Thornton Tomasetti provides engineering, design, investigation hether it’s a new facility or an existing structure, Thornton and analysis services to clients worldwide on projects of every size Tomasetti has the technical team for your project.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascent Designing with Precast
    ENTERTAINMENT ISSUE ® 2016 SPRING ASCENT DESIGNING WITH PRECAST C A T D U I O E N G N I U N Designer’s Notebook – I T N O Energy Conservation and C Condensation Control • Architect Profile: Bill Johnson of HOK • State of the Art Precast Stadia • Precast Delivers Diverse Entertainment Venues WWW.PCI.ORG MID-CENTRAL EDITION Assure Quality! DISCOVER Specify PCI OFFSITE Certification! PCI certification is the industry’s most proven, comprehensive, trusted, and specified certification program. PCI certification offers a complete regimen that covers personnel, plant, and field operations. This assures owners, specifiers, and designers that SEPTEMBER 21 & 22 precast concrete products are manufactured by companies that Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, D.C. subscribe to nationally accepted standards and that are audited to ensure compliance. $99* FOR QUALIFIED ATTENDEES! *Visit offsiteconstructionexpo.com for details. PCI certification is more than just inspections and documentation. It is based on, and integrated with the precast concrete industry’s Body of Knowledge. For over 60 years, PCI has set the standards REGISTER TO ATTEND or EXHIBIT NOW! and developed, maintained and disseminated the body of knowledge for the design and construction of precast concrete WWW.OFFSITECONSTRUCTIONEXPO.COM structures. This feat is set on the foundation of millions of dollars of research, dozens of technical guides and manuals, a network of over 70 committees, PCI’s professional and experienced staff, Why Attend Offsite Construction Expo? and support of over 2000 PCI members. The 2016 Offsite Construction Expo offers a focused presentation of the abilities of offsite construction across all markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture 2030 Fact Sheet 1 Architecture 2030 Fact Sheet
    Fact Sheet July 19, 2010 Because the Building Sector is key to addressing energy independence and climate change, the success of an energy or climate bill hinges on setting realistic targets for achieving dramatic energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions in the Building Sector. Set correctly, these targets can provide a reasonable and beneficial pace for change that will achieve the reductions necessary within the timeline called for by the scientific community. The following facts make clear what these targets need to be and show conclusively that they are achievable: 1. In 2008, the Building Sector was responsible for: • 50.1% of total annual U.S. energy consumption [1], • 49.1% of total annual U.S. GHG emissions [1], • 74.5% of total annual U.S. electricity consumption [2], and • most of the projected 7.34 QBtu increase in U.S. electricity consumption by 2030 [3]. 2. To constrain global warming within 2 °C, the IPCC projects that developed countries must cut their emissions 25% to 40% below 1990 levels by 2020 and 80% to 95% below 1990 levels by 2050, according to the best available scientific analyses. 3. In order to meet the reductions established by the scientific community, President Obama has called for an 83% reduction of U.S. GHG emissions below 2005 levels by 2050, which equates to approximately 80% below 1990 levels. 4. California, with one of the most aggressive and effective building energy codes in the country, Title 24, uses less than half the electricity and, on average, 44% less building energy consumption per capita when compared to states without a statewide building energy code (see Appendix D).
    [Show full text]
  • Green Communities Charrette
    Green Charrette Pre-Qualified Facilitator Registry Consultant Consultant Zip Phone Area of F.Name L.Name Title Company Address City State Code Number Email Address Accreditation Experience Expertise NATIONAL Josh Arnold, JD, MBA, LEED® AP, has over Franklin 12 years of experience in sustainable Manager, Sustainable Energy/Focus on 211 S. Paterson LEED® Accredited development. He is trained as an advocate, Green Joshua Arnold Development Energy Street, Suite 200 Madison WI 53703 608-310-6910 [email protected] Professional counselor and analyst - all necessary Building LEED® AP 2.1, As a facilitator, Elaine has extensive 2004 experience working with project teams and LEED Commercial organizations to help them best identify Interiors Faculty, sustainable 2004 strategies that will deliver the greatest value. Certified Interior Elaine is a member of the USGBC Training Designer, Faculty and is a frequent speaker at national B.A., Interior green Design, California building conferences including the Green Building 133 SW 2nd State University, GreenBuild, NeoCon, IFMA World Workplace Green Elaine Aye Principal Services, Inc. Avenue, Suite 201 Portland OR 97204 503-467-4715 [email protected] Sacramento, 1981 and Greenprints conferences. In 2003 she Building Mr. Conine has an academic background in architecture, urban planning and earth sciences. He has spend more than two decades working with city, state and tribal planning agencies. Mr. Conine's community development experience in business and Rural public sector environments includes Community 1764 East Pioneer economic and demographic analysis, land Green 1 David Conine Rural Development Specialist Assistance Corp. Road Draper UT 84020 801-501-0465 [email protected] use and resource planning, drafting planning Building Master Planning; Site Selection & Analysis; Housing Design; Urban Designer, Intern 1913 Gabaldon Ct.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Power Players Section, Sports Business Journal Recognizes the Leaders ARCHITECTS DEVELOPERS in Facility Design and Development
    SPORTS BUSINESS JOURNAL DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT In this Power Players section, Sports Business Journal recognizes the leaders ARCHITECTS DEVELOPERS in facility design and development. From architects and construction firms AECOM ASM Global to acoustics and retractable roof experts, these are the folks who are Brisbin Brook Beynon / Legends at the planning table at the beginning and whose visions SCI Architects Oak View Group ultimately make each venue unique. CannonDesign Sports Facilities DLR Group Companies Our Power Players series launched on April 18, 2016, with a look at the EwingCole The Cordish Companies Generator Studio influencers in the design and construction world. This is the first time that TEAMS Gensler we have revisited a sector, but with a record $8.9 billion in facility openings Miami Dolphins HKS this year, we thought it was an appropriate time. Los Angeles Dodgers HNTB HOK SPECIALISTS You might notice a slight change in the scope of companies compared with ANC Jones Lang LaSalle Cisco our first Power Players. Changes in security requirements, media production, Pendulum Studio Daktronics environmental concerns, game-day expectations and the increase Manica Architecture Dimensional in the number of these venues that serve as anchors to mixed-use sites Moody Nolan Innovations mean there are more shareholders involved on day one than there used to be. Perkins&Will Omni Hotels & Resorts Populous Samsung North But while the editorial staff of SBJ made the final decisions on who would Rossetti America make this list, the primary source of information came from industry peers. tvsdesign Wrightson, Johnson, We asked things like: “What competitor do you respect the most?” and Haddon and Williams CONSTRUCTION “What vendor do you want with you at the table from the beginning?” AECOM Hunt OWNERS REPRESENTATIVES As you read through these pages, you’ll see a lot of familiar faces.
    [Show full text]
  • July 25, 2012 Acting Administrator Daniel Tangherlini U.S. General
    July 25, 2012 Acting Administrator Daniel Tangherlini U.S. General Services Administration One Constitution Square 1275 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20417 Dear Acting Administrator Tangherlini, The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) is to be commended for its leadership in improving energy and environmental performance across its federal building portfolio. The recently released sustainability and energy “scorecard” by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) demonstrates just how successful GSA has been at reducing costs, improving efficiency and eliminating waste. • GSA earned the highest rating in all categories in the 2011 sustainability scorecard released from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). • GSA reduced emissions from federal buildings more than 20 percent compared with 2008. That incredible reduction led all federal agencies. • GSA is ahead of schedule in reducing its potable water and electricity use. These efforts are paying off in real terms. According to the OMB, investments in efficiency over the last four years are expected to save $18 billion in energy costs over the life of the projects. In an effort to continue this success, GSA is evaluating the building rating tools at its disposal, as required by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. LEED is the most widely used high‐performance building rating system in the United States. The private sector uses LEED to both verify and communicate the quality of high performance buildings. If GSA, as the “landlord of the federal government,” were to require or use something else, it would add cost to the building and leasing process across the building industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture Employers 2010-2015
    EMPLOYERS OF ARCHITECTURE GRADUATES IN MAJOR-RELATED POSITIONS (2010-2015) 360 Architecture Kansas City Missouri Allers Associate Architects Ft. Dodge Iowa Amento Group Seattle Washington Ammon Heisler Sachs Architects PC Baltimore Maryland Anning Johnson Stillwater Minnesota Architects Schipper Kastner - ASK STUDIO Des Moines Iowa Architexas Dallas Texas Benjamin Design Collaborative (3) Ames Iowa Bergland + Cram (3) Mason City Iowa Berners-Schober * Green Bay Wisconsin BHDP Architecture Cincinnati Ohio Big Creek Design Group Polk City Iowa BKV Group, Inc. * Minneapolis Minnesota BLDD Architects, Inc. Davenport Iowa BNIM Architects ** (7) Des Moines, IA and Madison, WI Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Seattle Washington Boulder Associates Architects California California Brooks Borg Skiles Architecture Engr LLP Des Moines Iowa BRR Architecture * Kansas City Missouri BSB Design ** (5) Des Moines Iowa BWBR Architects ** (4) St. Paul, MN & Madison, WI C3D Architecture New York City New York Calcon Constructors * Englewood Colorado Cannon Moss Brygger Architects (3) Sioux City Iowa CannonDesign **(2) Chicago Illinois Carlton Design team Iowa City Iowa CDH Partners, Inc. * Atlanta Georgia Charles Levin Architects * Minneapolis Minnesota Charles Saul Engineering Des Moines Iowa China Southwest Architectural Design and Research Chengdu, Sichuan China Institute Corp. LTD Claretian Associates Chicago Illinois Clark Design Group PLLC Seattle Washington CMA * Minneapolis Minnesota Community Rebuilds Moab Utah Connelly Tiehen and Sons Sioux City Iowa Corgan
    [Show full text]
  • COLLABORATION Intransitive Verb: to Work Jointly with Others Or Together, Especially in an Intellectual Endeavor ANNUAL REPORT 2011/2012
    COLLABORATION intransitive verb: to work jointly with others or together, especially in an intellectual endeavor ANNUAL REPORT 2011/2012 2012/2013 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS 2 EXECUTIVE MESSAGE COLLABORATION 4 Thornton Tomasetti provides engineering design, investigation and analysis services to clients worldwide 6 on projects of every size and level of complexity. Our six integrated practices (see inside back cover) address the full life cycle of structures. Founded in 1956, today Thornton Tomasetti is a 700-person organization 8 of engineers, architects and other professionals collaborating from offices across the United States and in Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East. 10 12 14 16 20 22 24 Cover: Bruce Arita and Thornton Tomasetti colleagues at the nightly meeting of the Sandy response team, with key leaders from Syska Hennessy, Hardesty & Hanover and Hatzel 26 & Buehler. This group met each night to determine staffing allocations for the next day. See page 26 for more. 28 CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE MESSAGE Oklahoma City we joined the integrated design teams for the opening day of Barclays Center and to celebrate the completion of Devon Energy Center, the tallest building in Oklahoma (pages 22 and 24). There is more. Browse the pages and you’ll see. Collaboration doesn’t just happen. It takes deliberate effort. We seek, attract and nurture people who thrive on working closely with colleagues and as a part of a team. We look for the ability to engage in open communication, to go deeper and ask the right questions, to share information, and to do the early legwork that makes later work go more smoothly for all.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture Employe
    EMPLOYERS OF ARCHITECTURE GRADUATES IN MAJOR-RELATED POSITIONS (2009-2014) 360 Architecture Kansas City Missouri Accrete Build & Design Private Limited * Mumbai India Adamson & Associates Architects New York City New York Advanced Technologies Group, Inc. * Chicago Illinois AECOM Kansas City Missouri Ainsworth-Benning Construction, Inc. * Rapid City South Dakota Akar Architecture + Design Iowa City Iowa Alley Poyner Macchietto Architects Des Moines Iowa Angelo Architectural Associates Urbandale Iowa Anning Johnson Stillwater Minnesota AP Architecture * Charlotte North Carolina Architects Smith Metzger (2) Des Moines Iowa Architectural Resource Ann Arbor Michigan Architectural Wall Systems, Co. * (2) Des Moines Iowa Architecture Incorporated SiouX Falls South Dakota Asymptote Architecture New York City New York Axi:ome St Louis Missouri Benjamin Design Collaborative (2) Ames Iowa Bergland + Cram (2) Mason City Iowa Berners-Schober * Green Bay Wisconsin BHDP Architecture Cincinnati Ohio BKV Group, Inc. * Minneapolis Minnesota BLDD Architects, Inc. Davenport Iowa BNIM Architects ** (6) Des Moines Iowa Bohlin Cywinski Jackson Seattle Washington Booth Hansen Chicago Illinois Boulder Associates Architects California California BRR Architecture * Kansas City Missouri BSB Design ** (5) Des Moines Iowa BWBR Architects ** (3) St. Paul, MN & Madison, WI C3D Architecture New York City New York Calcon Constructors * Englewood Colorado Cannon Design Chicago Illinois Cannon Moss Brygger Architects (2) SiouX City Iowa Carlton Design team Iowa City Iowa Charles Levin Architects * Minneapolis Minnesota Charles Saul Engineering Des Moines Iowa China Southwest Architectural Design and Research Chengdu, Sichuan China Institute Corp. LTD Clark Design Group PLLC Seattle Washington CMA * Minneapolis Minnesota Community Rebuilds Moab Utah Connelly Tiehen and Sons SiouX City Iowa Corgan Associates, Inc. (2) Dallas TeXas Creative Design Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Arena District
    Arena District Columbus, Ohio Project Type: Mixed Use/Multiuse Volume 37 Number 03 January–March 2007 Case Number: C037003 PROJECT TYPE Built on the site of a former penitentiary, the Arena District in downtown Columbus, Ohio, is a 75-acre (30.35-hectare) entertainment center with the 685,000-square-foot (63,639-square-meter) Nationwide Arena serving as its anchor. The arena is home to the National Hockey League’s Columbus Blue Jackets and the Arena Football League’s Columbus Destroyers. Developed to help transform the area into a 24/7 neighborhood, supportive retail and restaurants, a movie theater, office space, and residential units constitute the rest of the district in an architectural style that blends historic buildings and facades with new construction. The Arena District is the result of a public/private partnership among Nationwide Realty Investors, the Dispatch Printing Company, and the city of Columbus. LOCATION Central Business District SITE SIZE 75 acres/30.35 hectares LAND USES Mixed-Use District, Entertainment Center, Arena, Retail, Office Building(s), Condominiums, Multifamily Rental Housing KEYWORDS/SPECIAL FEATURES Urban Regeneration Public/Private Partnership Infill Development Adaptive Use DEVELOPER Nationwide Realty Investors Columbus, Ohio 614-857-2330 www.Arena-District.com ARCHITECT 360 Architects Columbus, Ohio 614-221-5407 www.360architects.com PLANNER MSI Design Columbus, Ohio 614-621-2796 www.msidesign.com GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Arena District is a 75-acre (30.35-hectare) master-planned neighborhood in downtown Columbus, Ohio. Originally home to the Ohio State Penitentiary, the site lay barren for more than a decade before it was purchased by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company during the mid-1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Langan Stadium & Arena Experience
    LANGAN STADIUM & ARENA EXPERIENCE METLIFE STADIUM Location: East Rutherford‚ NJ Architect: 360 Architects‚ Ewing Cole Partner: Skanska USA‚ Thornton Tomasetti Services: Site/Civil‚ Geotechnical‚ Environmental‚ Traditional Surveying‚ Natural Resources & Permitting‚ Traffic & Transportation‚ Landscape Architecture‚ OVERVIEW Home to the New York Giants and Jets‚ MetLife Stadium is an 82‚000-seat‚ open-air stadium constructed within the Meadowlands Sports Complex. The project was challenged by poor subsurface conditions‚ numerous existing site utilities‚ proximity to the existing stadium and racetrack‚ and the need to construct the proposed stadium while operating the existing Giants Stadium and utility infrastructure that serves the Meadowlands Sports Complex. The expertise of several Langan disciplines was called upon to facilitate design and construction of the stadium and maintain the project schedule. Langan provided geotechnical‚ site/civil‚ environmental‚ traffic engineering‚ surveying‚ permitting‚ and landscape architecture services for MetLife Stadium - working with the owners‚ design-build contractor‚ and a diverse team of architects and designers. BARCLAYS CENTER AT ATLANTIC YARDS Location: Brooklyn‚ NY Client: Forest City Ratner Companies Architect: SHoP Architects‚ AECOM Ellerbe Becket Partner: Thornton Tomasetti‚ WSP Services: Geotechnical‚ Earthquake/Seismic‚ OVERVIEW The Atlantic Yards project consists of the redevelopment of six city blocks in the Prospect Heights section of Brooklyn‚ NY and includes the Barclays Center‚ an entertainment center and new home arena of the Brooklyn Nets. Langan served as the geotechnical engineer for the arena and high-rise structures at the Vanderbilt Yard. In addition‚ Langan's site-specific seismic study resulted in a favorable seismic designation‚ thus avoiding unnecessary seismic detailing and connections‚ and more importantly‚ foundation ties - which saved millions of dollars.
    [Show full text]