Download Plant List

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Plant List Plants of Lanark County Ontario 2016 Edition David J. White January 2016 Plants of Lanark County Ontario 2016 Edition David J. White January 2016 To contribute new records or offer comments, contact me at: Phone (613) 259-3135 e-mail: [email protected] © David J. White 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................... 3 INTRODUCTION ...................................... 4 FIGURE 1: SIMPLIFIED BEDROCK GEOLOGY . 9 SIGNIFICANT AREAS................................. 10 FIGURE 2: LANARK COUNTY LOCATIONS . 20 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST ............................ 22 APPENDIX 1: Excluded Species and Unconfirmed Reports . 79 APPENDIX 2: Alphabetical List of Significant Native Plants . 81 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................... 89 INDEX .............................................. 92 Cover photo: Cardinal-flower (Lobelia cardinalis). Plants of Lanark County, Ontario (2016 ed.) Page 2 David J. White, January 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank a number of people for their important contribution to the checklist. Dan Brunton, Ottawa, has provided many records, offered on-going support and encouragement, helped with identifications, and reviewed several earlier drafts of the list. Mike Oldham, Natural Heritage Information Centre, Peterborough, reviewed earlier drafts of the list, provided advice and many records over the years, and made available the database of Lanark County records from the herbarium of Queen’s University. Mike also checked the identification of over 100 of my voucher specimens of grasses and sedges. Stephen Darbyshire, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, reviewed the grass family, provided a number of records, and helped locate relevant literature. Don Cuddy, formerly with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), Kemptville, made field notes available and reviewed several early drafts of the list. I would like to thank several former colleagues (all now retired) from the Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa. Albert Dugal provided many records and helped with identifications. Mike Shchepanek made field notes available, provided printouts of records from the Museum’s plant database, and helped locate some references. George Argus helped with identification of some Willow (Salix) collections and reviewed that section of a draft of the list. Jim Soper provided access to his site records and data files of Ontario shrubs. Patsie Rothschild (formerly of Sheridans Rapids) made many important discoveries, took me to special places, and also reviewed several early drafts of the list. The late Adolf Vogg, Arnprior, explored much of the northern portion of the county and contributed many records to this list. Adolf's enthusiasm for botanizing new places and finding new plants helped to keep me interested in the checklist project during the early years. Eleanor Thomson, Merrickville, provided numerous records of new and significant species—based on her recent inventory work in several parts of the county—and took the author to several special locations. Graham Page of Ottawa contributed many recent county records, has accompanied me on numerous trips, and has taken me to many interesting locations he has found in the county. Jean Griffin, Perth, provided a number of new records and took the author to several special locations. Howard Clifford of the (now-closed) Alba Wilderness School, Flower Station, took the author to a number of diverse areas on the extensive Clifford family property. I would also like to thank several people who contributed one to a few records each: Jack Harris and Wendy Frise of Guelph, Heather Patterson of Kitchener, Ken Allison of Almonte, Ron Hepworth of Brantford, Nora Mansfield of Perth, Kristl Walek, formerly of North Gower, and Dawson Girdwood of Perth. Joyce and Allan Reddoch, Ottawa, supplied the records from the Native Orchid Location Survey and reviewed the orchid section of the draft list. The late Clarrie Frankton, formerly of Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, reviewed an early draft of the list and helped with some identifications. Ted Mosquin, Fallbrook, provided many records and took the author to several interesting areas. Tobi Kiesewalter, Murphys Point Provincial Park, provided park observations and helped the author relocate several old records. Bill Crins, formerly of Ontario Parks, Peterborough, helped with several identifications, mainly in the genus Carex. Cathy and Paul Keddy, Carleton Place, provided many important records and took the author to a number of diverse areas on their large property. Kathy Sauvé, former Park Superintendent for Murphys Point and Silver Lake Provincial Parks, Mike Ogilvie, Park Superintendent for Murphys Point Provincial Park, and John Immerseel, Ontario Parks Southeastern Zone Manager, allowed the author to conduct plant studies in the two parks. I would also like to thank the curators and collection managers of the Ottawa-Hull herbaria of Agriculture Canada and the Canadian Museum of Nature for helping with access to Lanark County specimens. Alice White helped with editing and data checking, and Katy (Williams) White helped on several field trips. Finally, I would like to thank Shaun Thompson, MNR, Kemptville, who arranged funding in 1998 to enable my rough draft list to progress to a useable—albeit preliminary—state. Without the help and encouragement of the above-mentioned people, this list would be little more than a pile of field notes and several boxes of file cards. Plants of Lanark County, Ontario (2016 ed.) Page 3 David J. White, January 2016 INTRODUCTION The following checklist presents the 1309 taxa (species, subspecies, varieties, and hybrids) of native and non- native vascular plants known by the author to occur in Lanark County. Vascular plants are those which have vessels or ducts to transport fluids. Included are trees, shrubs, herbaceous flowering plants (annual and perennial), ferns, clubmosses, and horsetails, but not mosses, lichens, or algae. For a non-native plant to be included on the list, it must have been found growing in the county without the aid of cultivation. There are numerous garden plants and agricultural crops on this list, but all were found where they had spread on their own and were surviving untended. It is hoped that making this list available will encourage the recording of new species, the reporting of additional records of rare and sparse plants, and the refining of the status designations. The list should be regarded as a working list and a ‘snapshot in time’ of the Lanark flora. A county checklist can be a useful aid to plant identification when used along with floras and field guides that cover a larger geographical area. By highlighting significant native species (rare or sparse) the list should be a useful reference for environmental impact studies and natural area evaluations. The author began collecting and recording Lanark County plants in 1975 when a 100-acre property was purchased for a home in Dalhousie Township. The first rough draft of the county checklist was prepared in 1987, the second draft (containing 922 taxa) was completed in 1990, the third draft (containing 1080 taxa) was written in 1998, the fourth draft (containing 1129 taxa) was circulated to a small group of reviewers in 1999, and the fifth draft (containing 1260 taxa) was completed in 2004. The 2006 version of the list, that was made available on the www.lanarkflora.com web site to anyone interested, contained information on 1271 taxa. The 2008 revision brought the total to 1289 taxa, where it remained in the 2009 update. In 2009, a new section on Significant Areas (page 10) was added to highlight areas with exceptional plant diversity and rare plant concentrations. The 2010 edition added six new species to bring the total to 1295 taxa. The 2011 version added two species and brought the list to 1297 taxa. The 2013 edition added five new species to bring the total known in the county to 1302 taxa. UPDATE HIGHLIGHTS The 2016 update is a relatively minor revision of the previous (2013) edition. Eight new taxa (species and hybrids) have been added: Campanula trachelium—Nettle-leaved Bellflower; Euonymus alata—Winged Burning-bush; Isoetes septentrionalis—Northern Quillwort; Isoetes ×dodgei—Dodge's Quillwort; Mentha ×gentilis—Red Mint; Potamogeton ×faxonii—Hybrid Pondweed; Spiranthes magnicamporum—Great Plains Ladies'-tresses; and Staphylea trifolia—Bladdernut. Salix ×rubens—Hybrid Willow has been subsumed under Salix ×fragilis (following FNA, 2016) reducing the list count by one. There have been additional records of rare, sparse, and uncommon species, resulting in status designation changes for quite a few plants. Recently published volumes in the Flora North America project (FNA, 2016) have necessitated a number of nomenclatural changes in Salicaceae, Brassicaceae, and Rosaceae. SOURCES The list is based on the author's collections and sight records from 1975 to the present; the specimens housed at the herbaria of the Canadian Museum of Nature (CAN) in Aylmer, Que, and Agriculture Canada (DAO), in Ottawa; and the sight and specimen records of: Patsie Rothschild, Ottawa; the late Adolf Vogg, Arnprior; Dan Brunton, Ottawa; Don Cuddy, formerly with the Ministry of Natural Resources, Kemptville; Albert Dugal, Mike Shchepanek, and Jim Soper, all formerly with the Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa; Stephen Darbyshire, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa; Ted Mosquin, Lanark; Eleanor Thomson, Merrickville; Paul and Cathy Keddy, Carleton Place; and Sheila and Harry Thomson, Ottawa. Plants of Lanark County, Ontario (2016 ed.) Page
Recommended publications
  • Botanist Interior 43.1
    2005 THE MICHIGAN BOTANIST 13 THE ROLE OF FIRE IN GREAT LAKES ALVAR LANDSCAPES Judith Jones1 and Carol Reschke2 1Author for correspondence. Winter Spider Eco-Consulting, R.R. #1 Sheguiandah, Manitoulin Island, Ontario P0P 1W0 Canada E-mail: [email protected] . 2The Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota 5013 Miller Trunk Highway Duluth, Minnesota 55811 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The role of fire in alvar landscapes in the Great Lakes region of the United States and Canada was examined through the notes of the original land surveyors, through field work which looked for burn evidence, and through a comparison of alvars on two sets of aerial photographs taken 40 to 45 years apart. The results show that alvars existed in all regions of the Great Lakes prior to settlement of the area by European immigrants. Also, fire can create alvars and has done so in the last 150 years. Some alvar community types correlate strongly with past burning while others correlate with no burning. Some community types show noticeable change in a 40 year period while others show lit- tle or none. Although the presence of burn evidence is common, fire is shown to be infrequent in alvar landscapes, with some communities experiencing fire return intervals of at least 200–500 years. In these communities, fire is not the primary factor maintaining the open condition. The history of Great Lakes alvars is shown to be diverse and complex. Controlled burning is not recommended for all sites or all alvar community types. INTRODUCTION “Alvar” is a Swedish word used for the grasslands on the island of Oland, in the Baltic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • • Burnt Lands PARKS Interim Management Statement
    , . ONTARIO • Burnt Lands PARKS Interim Management Statement ® Ontario Cette publlcatlon hautement speclalisee n'est disponible qu'en anglais en vertu du reqlernent 411/97, qui en exempte I'application de la Loi sur les services en trenceis. Pour obtenir de I'aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec Ie bureau district du MRN de Kemptville, au (613) 258-8204. Zone Manager's Approval Statement The recommended Burnt Lands Provincial Park (Nature Reserve Class) will protect alvar communities of international significance. The park will include land secured through the Ontario Parks Legacy 2000 Program and Crown land identified through the Ontario's Living Legacy Land Use Strategy. This Interim Management Statement will provide direction for the management of the park until a Park Management Plan is prepared. This document will provide the basis for future management planning. I am pleased to approve this Interim Management Statement for the recommended Burnt Lands Provincial Park (Nature Reserve Class). , L .-.­ John. M. Immerseel 'South Eastern Zone Manager Ontario Parks Kingston, ON Burnt Lands Provincial Park (Nature Reserve Class) Interim Management Statement Ontario Parks, South Eastern Zone 2001 CONTENTS 1.0 Background ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Planning Issues............................................................................................. 2 2.0 Site Description ......................................... ~ .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts
    Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts September 15, 2013 This report is the result of several years of field data collection, analyses and IBI development, and consideration of the opportunities for wetland program and policy development in relation to IBIs and CAPS Index of Ecological Integrity (IEI). Contributors include: University of Massachusetts Amherst Kevin McGarigal, Ethan Plunkett, Joanna Grand, Brad Compton, Theresa Portante, Kasey Rolih, and Scott Jackson Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Jan Smith, Marc Carullo, and Adrienne Pappal Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Lisa Rhodes, Lealdon Langley, and Michael Stroman Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts Abstract The purpose of this study was to develop a fully empirically-based method for developing Indices of Biotic Integrity (IBIs) that does not rely on expert opinion or the arbitrary designation of reference sites and pilot its application in forested wetlands, coastal salt marshes and wadable freshwater streams in Massachusetts. The method we developed involves: 1) using a suite of regression models to estimate the abundance of each taxon across a gradient of stressor levels, 2) using statistical calibration based on the fitted regression models and maximum likelihood methods to predict the value of the stressor metric based on the abundance of the taxon at each site, 3) selecting taxa in a forward stepwise procedure that conditionally improves the concordance between the observed stressor value and the predicted value the most and a stopping rule for selecting taxa based on a conditional alpha derived from comparison to pseudotaxa data, and 4) comparing the coefficient of concordance for the final IBI to the expected distribution derived from randomly permuted data.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Municipal Parcel Review Package County of Lanark
    Small Craft HORTON Arnprior Harbour MCNAB/BRAESIDE COUNTY OF RENFREW MISSISSIPPI MILLS GREATER MADAWASKA 60G OTTAWA Mississippi Mills 267 Carleton Place 202 BECKWITH LANARK HIGHLANDS COUNTY OF LANARK 81B 81A MONTAGUE NORTH DRUMMOND/NORTH FRONTENAC ELMSLEY Smiths Falls Perth 276 80 214 M E R RIDEAU R IC LAKES K 313 V IL L E -W TAY O L COUNTY OF F VALLEY O R FRONTENAC D UNITED COUNTIES CENTRAL OF LEEDS AND ELIZABETHTOWN-KITLEY FRONTENAC GRENVILLE SOUTH FRONTENAC ATHENS Proposed Settlement Lands DRAFT FOR County of Lanark Algonquin Interest on Crown Lands DISCUSSION Proposed Provincial Park PURPOSES Index Map of Algonquin Land Claim Settlement Boundary Note: official plan designation and zoning will not apply to lands proposed for transfer Provincial Park Proposed Settlement Lands that are located in an unincorporated areas. First Nation Reserve This map is intended to be used for internal purposes Federal Lands only and is not to be distributed. Do not rely on it as 0 10 20 km being a precise indicator of routes, locations of features, Crown Land or as a guide to navigation. This map may contain cartographic errors or omissions. Map data compiled Lower / Single Tier Municipal Boundary from various sources. Datum: North American 1983 Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N Published August 1:390,000 District / Upper Tier Municipal Boundary 24, 2017 County of Lanark The chart identifies proposed official plan designations and zoning that are proposed to be applied to each parcel. Since the Algonquin Land Claim negotiations are ongoing, the proposed settlement land selections may be subject to revision by the parties up until the final settlement agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Lanark County Council Wednesday, August 24Th, 2005 7:00 P.M
    COUNTY OF LANARK COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING SUNSET BOULEVARD, PERTH, ONTARIO AGENDA LANARK COUNTY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 24TH, 2005 7:00 P.M. COUNTY COUNCIL COUNTY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Susan Freeman, Chair 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. MOMENT OF SILENT MEDITATION 3. ROLL CALL 4. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Suggested Motion by Councillor John Fenik: “THAT, the minutes of the Lanark County Council meeting held on June 22nd, 2005 and the minutes of the “Special” Lanark County Council meeting held on July 6th, 2005 be approved as presented.” 6. ADDITIONS AND APPROVAL OF AGENDA Suggested Motion by Councillor Dennis Cordick: “THAT, the agenda be adopted as presented.” 7. COMMUNICATIONS i) Mississippi River Water Management Plan – Draft Plan Review 3rd Public Information Centre – copies of the plan can be reviewed at the Clerks Office – attached, page 6. Suggested Motion by Councillor David Schoular: “THAT, the Mississippi River Water Management Plan – Draft Plan Review 3rd Public Information Centre communication be received as information only.” 8. DELEGATIONS None 1 of 43 9. COMMITTEE REPORTS • Perth Hotel Request for Support, Peter Wagland, CAO – to be distributed at the meeting. • Report #C-14-2005 Agendas and Minutes Public Documents – attached, page 10. Suggested Motion by Councillor Gary Doyle: “THAT, the County website be utilized to provide a method of making available all Council and Committee minutes and agendas for inspection; THAT, a disclaimer appear on the website in a highly visible location, stating that Staff Reports and Committee Minutes are recommendations to Council and that current agendas and minutes are subject to amendments and adoption by Council; AND THAT, the format in Appendix C of the Procedural By-Law 2003-38 be amended to change RECOMMENDATIONS to STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.” • Community Development: August 3rd, 2005 meeting, page 15 – Chair J.
    [Show full text]
  • Maple Syrup Capital of Ontario Maple Byway Tours of Lanark County
    ONTARIO • CANADA • ONTARIO THE HEART OF LANARK LIMESTONE TOUR TAY VALLEY Refer to navy route on reverse Refer to purple route on reverse Refer to green route on reverse approx. 78 miles (125 km) approx. 62 miles (100 km) approx. 75 miles (120 km) Smooth roads that often cross paths with the Clyde River The ruggedness that characterizes much of Lanark Following the War of 1812, a group of Scottish emigrants Maple Syrup Capital of Ontario Archives Lanark Mill of Kintail and Mississippi River and Lake provide a relaxing drive County gives way in the south to the Limestone Plain, took advantage of government incentives to leave the 1 (613) 267-2232 6 Conservation Area Maple Byway Tours of Lanark County through bustling towns and quiet villages in the Heart once part of the floor of the prehistoric Champlain impoverished lowlands and start a new life in the British or (613) 256-3130 (613) 256-3610 ex. 2 of Lanark. The tour starts and finishes in Carleton Place, Sea, now a mainly flat region of exposed limestone military settlements of Upper Canada. However, they approximately 125 km. and shallow soils. Transportation dominates the maintained links to the old by naming communities Carleton Place Mississippi Valley history of this region, from the Rideau Canal, a and landmarks after familiar places back home, and by 2 7 & Beckwith Heritage Textile Museum For more routes, visit www.lanarkcountytourism.ca Today, Carleton Place, with a direct highway link to World Heritage Site built in 1826–32 as a military using their skills to build substantial mills, fine homes Museum (613) 256-3754 Ottawa, is the fastest-growing community in Lanark supply route linking Montreal and Kingston, to and tidy farms.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the 137Th Annual Business Meeting of the Ottawa Field
    Minutes of the 137 th Annual Business Meeting of the Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club March 21, 2016 Place and time: Fletcher Wildlife Garden, Ottawa, Ontario, 7:00 pm Chairperson: Fenja Brodo, President of the OFNC Over 20 attendees spent the first half-hour reviewing the minutes of the previous ABM, the financial statements, the OFNC committees’ annual reports for 2014-2015 and the newly updated Terms of Reference for each com - mittee. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 pm. 1. Minutes of the Previous Annual Business wards the purchase of land near Westmeath (the Ger - Meeting vais Caves), the creation of the OFNC Research Grants It was moved by Annie Bélair and seconded by ($15,000 yearly), a donation of $5000 to the Mississippi Diane Lepage that the minutes of the 136 th Annual Valley Field Naturalists to help cover the cost of the ap - Business Meeting be accepted as distributed. peal to the Ontario Municipal Board to stop a planned Carried housing development that would destroy a portion of the Burnt Lands Alvar, and a donation of $4500 to the Innis Point Bird Observatory to help them hire a ban - 2. Business Arising from the Minutes Ann gave an update on the review of the constitu - der-in-charge for the 2016 Spring Migration Monitoring tion and bylaws of the club. (See item 8 in the minutes Program. of the 2015 ABM.) For the 2015-2016 fiscal year, the OFNC is consid - The club started updating its constitution and by - ering donating money to the MacSkimming and Bill laws because the Ontario government had announced Mason Outdoor Education Centres to help pay for bus - that it would amend the Ontario Not-for-Profit Cor por - es and some equipment, is working with a contractor to ations Act.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Botanical Collectors at Grandfather Mountain, NC
    HISTORY OF BOTANICAL COLLECTORS AT GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN, NC DURING THE 19TH CENTURY AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE FLORA OF THE BOONE FORK HEADWATERS WITHIN GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STATE PARK, NC A Thesis by ETHAN LUKE HUGHES Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies at Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science May 2020 Department of Biology HISTORY OF BOTANICAL COLLECTORS AT GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN, NC DURING THE 19TH CENTURY AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE FLORA OF THE BOONE FORK HEADWATERS WITHIN GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STATE PARK, NC A Thesis by ETHAN LUKE HUGHES May 2020 APPROVED BY: Dr. Zack E. Murrell Chairperson, Thesis Committee Dr. Mike Madritch Member, Thesis Committee Dr. Paul Davison Member, Thesis Committee Dr. Zack E. Murrell Chairperson, Department of Biology Mike McKenzie, Ph.D. Dean, Cratis D. Williams School of Graduate Studies Copyright by Ethan L. Hughes 2020 All Rights Reserved Abstract History of botanical collectors at Grandfather Mountain, NC during the 19th century and an analysis of the flora of the Boone Fork headwaters Within Grandfather Mountain State Park, NC Ethan L. Hughes B.S. Clemson University Chairperson: Dr. Zack E. Murrell The Southern Appalachian Mountains have been an active region of botanical exploration for over 250 years. The high mountain peaks of western North Carolina, in particular, have attracted interest due to their resemblance of forest communities in NeW England and Canada and to their high species diversity. From the middle of the 19th century, Grandfather Mountain has been a destination for famous botanists conducting research in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Butterflies in Southern Ontario
    efforts for these butterflies must take that into Conservation of Butterflies account. Re-discovered butterflies One of the great thrills for butterfly enthusiasts in Southern Ontario in North America is to re-discover colonies of by Peter W. Hall a butterfly species in a region where it had not been, or rarely, seen for many years. This has happened with two species in the province. In June, 1891, four Gorgone Checkerspots were found at Scarborough just west of Introduction dramatically, a number of formerly restricted Toronto. A few other historical records from Butterflies at the edge of their range often range species in southwestern Ontario have the late 19th century exist from London and expand or contract their distribution and been breeding farther north and east in from the Humber Valley west of Toronto. numbers based on factors such as annual large numbers. Finally, for some butterflies, As well, there were a few specimens taken migration, climate shifts and habitat loss. In particularly those annual migrants with in 1907 at White Rock, Algoma District southern Ontario, many butterfly species are fluctuating breeding numbers or special case in Northern Ontario. Then there was no at the northern, or in some cases southern, species, the jury is still out on possible range indication that the butterfly existed in the edge of their range and in recent times have expansions or shrinkages over time. province for almost a hundred years. exhibited shifting ranges and numbers that However, in 1996 a small colony was raise conservation challenges. Sometimes Extirpated butterflies encountered near Kemptville in eastern these shifts are very noticeable such as the Although no butterfly species that were Rick Cavasin Ontario and subsequently about a dozen final disappearance of ‘Karner’ Melissa Blues found in Ontario have gone extinct, three Gorgone Checkerspots rolled in and then more colonies were found in the same in the 1980s or the appearance of the Giant eastern North American butterflies have been rolled out, apparently in concert with vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Strategy & Action Plan
    Tourism Strategy & Action Plan 2020-2025 Tourism Strategy & Action Plan 2020-2025 Contents Introduction 3 Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 4 Destination Management 6 Strategic Direction 6 Action Plan 7 1. Enhance Collaboration 8 2. Focus on Visitors 10 3. Expand on Experiences 11 4. Build on Themes 13 5. Broaden Reach 16 6. Follow Progress 18 Monitoring & Evaluation 19 References 19 Appendices 20 Appendix I: Community Input Report 20 Appendix II: Lanark County Tourism Marketing Plan 28 Appendix III: Competitive Analysis 28 Defining our Competition 29 Community Profile 30 Geology Map of Lanark County 31 Tourism Industry Labour Market Trends 31 Tourism Sector Composition 33 Tourism Assets 33 Physical Infrastructure (Public) 33 Tourism Attraction & Services (Private) 33 Political Structure & Support 34 Social Culture & Fabric 34 Quality of Life 35 Appendix IV: Resources 38 Introduction Tourism in Lanark County involves the activities of a variety of people, organizations, business owners and staff. This document is published by the Tourism Department of Lanark County in its role as the Destination Marketing Organization (DMO). On behalf of its municipal partners, the role of the County is to: • Develop a destination strategy and annual marketing plan for Lanark County; • Deliver destination focused marketing; • Support the development of local tourism products; • Support destination development activities; and • Develop goals for tourism infrastructure investment in alignment with local municipal needs. This document will act as the destination
    [Show full text]
  • Juniper Sedge (Carex Juniperorum) in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Adopted under Section 44 of SARA Recovery Strategy for the Juniper Sedge (Carex juniperorum) in Canada Juniper Sedge 2019 Recommended citation: Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2019. Recovery Strategy for the Juniper Sedge (Carex juniperorum) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa. 3 parts, 21 pp. + vi + 25 pp. + 6 pp. For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry1. Cover illustration: Samuel Brinker Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement du carex des genévriers (Carex juniperorum) au Canada» © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, 2019. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-660-28284-8 Catalogue no. En3-4/296-2019E-PDF Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. 1 http://sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=24F7211B-1 RECOVERY STRATEGY FOR THE JUNIPER SEDGE (Carex juniperorum) IN CANADA 2019 Under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996), the federal, provincial, and territorial governments agreed to work together on legislation, programs, and policies to protect wildlife species at risk throughout Canada. In the spirit of cooperation of the Accord, the Government of Ontario has given permission to the Government of Canada to adopt the Recovery Strategy for the Juniper Sedge (Carex juniperorum) in Ontario (Part 2) and the Juniper Sedge – Ontario Government Response Statement (Part 3) under section 44 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA).
    [Show full text]
  • Community Risk Assessment
    February 2020 The Township of Lanark Highlands and the Lanark Highlands Fire Service Community Risk Assessment Peter McLaren Gene Richardson Reeve Fire Chief Developed by: Emergency Management & Training Inc. 65 Cedar Pointe Drive, Suite 144 Barrie, ON L4N 9R3 Table of Contents Dates of Review and Updates ................................................................................................ 5 Risk Summary ........................................................................................................................ 7 OFMEM Fire Statistics from 2015 to 2017 ............................................................................. 10 Profile Worksheets .............................................................................................................. 11 Worksheet 1: Geographic Profile ......................................................................................... 11 Worksheet 2: Building Stock Profile ..................................................................................... 14 Worksheet 3: Critical Infrastructure Profile .......................................................................... 21 Worksheet 4a: Demographic Profile..................................................................................... 24 Worksheet 4b: Demographic Profile..................................................................................... 33 Worksheet 5: Hazard Profile ................................................................................................ 35 Worksheet 6: Public
    [Show full text]