DOCSLIB.ORG

Photo Monitoring of High-Elevation Plants in Shenandoah National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Photo Monitoring of High-Elevation Plants in Shenandoah National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Photo Monitoring of High-Elevation Plants in Shenandoah National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/SHEN/NRR—2017/1542 ON THIS PAGE High-elevation Sibbaldiopsis tridentata site at Betty’s Rock Photograph by: Lea Korsmeyer, NPS ON THE COVER High-elevation Sibbaldiopsis tridentata site at Little Stony Man Photograph by: Lea Korsmeyer, NPS Photo Monitoring of High-Elevation Plants in Shenandoah National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/SHEN/NRR—2017/1542 Abigail R. Hyduke and Wendy B. Cass National Park Service Shenandoah National Park 3655 US Hwy 211 East Luray, VA November 2017 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available in digital format from the National Park Service Data Store and the Natural Resource Publications Management website. To receive this report in a format that is optimized to be accessible using screen readers for the visually or cognitively impaired, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Hyduke A. R., and W. B. Cass. 2017. Photo monitoring of high-elevation plants in Shenandoah National Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/SHEN/NRR—2017/1542. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 134/140555, November 2017 ii Contents Page Figures.................................................................................................................................................... v Tables ..................................................................................................................................................... v Appendices ............................................................................................................................................ vi Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ vii Acknowledgments ...............................................................................................................................viii List of Terms ......................................................................................................................................... ix Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Areas .................................................................................................................................... 3 Huperzia appalachiana Sampling Areas .................................................................................... 3 Sibbaldiopsis tridentata Sampling Areas ................................................................................... 6 Site Weather and Climate ............................................................................................................... 7 Plot Selection and Setup ................................................................................................................. 7 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................... 8 Site Data .................................................................................................................................... 8 Plot Data .................................................................................................................................... 8 Photography ............................................................................................................................... 9 Data Analysis................................................................................................................................ 11 Results and Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 14 Huperzia appalachiana Sites ....................................................................................................... 14 Crescent Rocks Site 3 .............................................................................................................. 14 Hawksbill Site 2 ...................................................................................................................... 14 Old Rag Site 1 ......................................................................................................................... 15 Pinnacles Site 1........................................................................................................................ 15 Pinnacles Site 2........................................................................................................................ 15 Sibbaldiopsis tridentata Sites ....................................................................................................... 15 Betty’s Rock Site 1 .................................................................................................................. 15 Crescent Rocks Site 1 .............................................................................................................. 16 iii Contents (continued) Page Crescent Rocks Site 2 .............................................................................................................. 17 Hawksbill Site 1 ...................................................................................................................... 17 Hawksbill Site 3 ...................................................................................................................... 17 Little Stony Man Site 1............................................................................................................ 17 Summary of Plant Cover Changes, 2010-2014 ............................................................................ 18 Exposure .................................................................................................................................. 18 Sensitivity ................................................................................................................................ 19 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 21 Literature Cited .................................................................................................................................... 22 iv Figures Page Figure 1. Photographs of Huperzia appalachiana (left) and flowering Sibbaldiopsis tridentata (right). .................................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2. Map of the project sampling areas with in Shenandoah National Park. ................................ 4 Figure 3. Example of locator plots (Sibbaldiopsis tridentata plot (left) and Huperzia appalachiana plot (right)). ..................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 4. Example of datum photos (S. tridentata plot (left) and H. appalachiana plot (right)). ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Figure 5. A top-down photo of Huperzia appalachiana and plot frame. ........................................... 12 Figure 6. A top-down photo of Sibbaldiopsis tridentata and plot frame. ........................................... 13 Figure 7. Percent cover of Huperzia appalachiana at monitoring sites that have information for both 2010 to 2014. ...................................................................................................... 14 Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts
    Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts September 15, 2013 This report is the result of several years of field data collection, analyses and IBI development, and consideration of the opportunities for wetland program and policy development in relation to IBIs and CAPS Index of Ecological Integrity (IEI). Contributors include: University of Massachusetts Amherst Kevin McGarigal, Ethan Plunkett, Joanna Grand, Brad Compton, Theresa Portante, Kasey Rolih, and Scott Jackson Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Jan Smith, Marc Carullo, and Adrienne Pappal Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Lisa Rhodes, Lealdon Langley, and Michael Stroman Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts Abstract The purpose of this study was to develop a fully empirically-based method for developing Indices of Biotic Integrity (IBIs) that does not rely on expert opinion or the arbitrary designation of reference sites and pilot its application in forested wetlands, coastal salt marshes and wadable freshwater streams in Massachusetts. The method we developed involves: 1) using a suite of regression models to estimate the abundance of each taxon across a gradient of stressor levels, 2) using statistical calibration based on the fitted regression models and maximum likelihood methods to predict the value of the stressor metric based on the abundance of the taxon at each site, 3) selecting taxa in a forward stepwise procedure that conditionally improves the concordance between the observed stressor value and the predicted value the most and a stopping rule for selecting taxa based on a conditional alpha derived from comparison to pseudotaxa data, and 4) comparing the coefficient of concordance for the final IBI to the expected distribution derived from randomly permuted data.
    [Show full text]
  • Mm Wttmn, the Shenandoah Valley Became an Artery of Critical Impor­ Soil Forest in the South Section of the Park
    Shenandoah NATIONAL PARK VIRGINIA mm wttMN, The Shenandoah Valley became an artery of critical impor­ soil forest in the south section of the park. The characteristically tance during the War Between the States. General Jackson's dwarfed appearance of the deciduous trees overtopped by pine Shenandoah valley campaign is recognized as a superb example of military serves to distinguish the dry-soil forest from the moist-soil tactics. The mountain gaps within the park were strategically forest which predominates in the park. NATIONAL PARK important and were used frequently during these campaigns. Certain sections of the park support a variety of shrubs. The idea for a national park in the Southern Appalachian Notable among these are the azalea, the wild sweet crabapple, The Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia are famed for their Mountains originated in the early 1920's. In succeeding years, and the hawthorn which bloom in May, followed in summer by scenic loveliness, romantic setting, and historical association. the State and people of Virginia, together with public-spirited the ninebark, Jersey-tea, and the sumac. During late May and In the heart of these lofty mountains is the Shenandoah Na­ conservationists from other parts of the United States, purchased June the mountain-laurel transforms whole mountainsides into tional Park. Its majestic tree-covered peaks reach elevations of 176,430 acres of Blue Ridge Mountain lands. This area was a mass of bloom. more than 4,000 feet above the sea. Much of the time these deeded to the Federal Government for administration and Trees with a profusion of conspicuous blossoms include development as a national park in 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Botanical Collectors at Grandfather Mountain, NC
    HISTORY OF BOTANICAL COLLECTORS AT GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN, NC DURING THE 19TH CENTURY AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE FLORA OF THE BOONE FORK HEADWATERS WITHIN GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STATE PARK, NC A Thesis by ETHAN LUKE HUGHES Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies at Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science May 2020 Department of Biology HISTORY OF BOTANICAL COLLECTORS AT GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN, NC DURING THE 19TH CENTURY AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE FLORA OF THE BOONE FORK HEADWATERS WITHIN GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STATE PARK, NC A Thesis by ETHAN LUKE HUGHES May 2020 APPROVED BY: Dr. Zack E. Murrell Chairperson, Thesis Committee Dr. Mike Madritch Member, Thesis Committee Dr. Paul Davison Member, Thesis Committee Dr. Zack E. Murrell Chairperson, Department of Biology Mike McKenzie, Ph.D. Dean, Cratis D. Williams School of Graduate Studies Copyright by Ethan L. Hughes 2020 All Rights Reserved Abstract History of botanical collectors at Grandfather Mountain, NC during the 19th century and an analysis of the flora of the Boone Fork headwaters Within Grandfather Mountain State Park, NC Ethan L. Hughes B.S. Clemson University Chairperson: Dr. Zack E. Murrell The Southern Appalachian Mountains have been an active region of botanical exploration for over 250 years. The high mountain peaks of western North Carolina, in particular, have attracted interest due to their resemblance of forest communities in NeW England and Canada and to their high species diversity. From the middle of the 19th century, Grandfather Mountain has been a destination for famous botanists conducting research in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form
    VLR Listed: 12/4/1996 NRHP Listed: 4/28/1997 NFS Form 10-900 ! MAR * * I99T 0MB( No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) .^^oTT^Q CES United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Skyline Drive Historic District other name/site number: N/A 2. Location street & number: Shenandoah National Park (SHEN) not for publication: __ city/town: Luray vicinity: x state: VA county: Albemarle code: VA003 zip code: 22835 Augusta VA015 Greene VA079 Madison VA113 Page VA139 Rappahannock VA157 Rockingham VA165 Warren VA187 3. Classification Ownership of Property: public-Federal Category of Property: district Number of Resources within Property: Contributing Noncontributing 9 8 buildings 8 3 sites 136 67 structures 22 1 objects 175 79 Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: none Name of related multiple property listing: Historic Park Landscapes in National and State Parks 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _x _ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _x _ meets __^ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant x nationally __ statewide __ locally. ( __ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) _____________ Signature of certifying of ficial Date _____ ly/,a,-K OAJ.
    [Show full text]
  • Shenandoah N a T > ° N a Vjrginia 1
    SHENANDOAH N A T > ° N A VJRGINIA 1 . SHENANDOAH 'T'HE Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia are famed in song and tradition for their scenic loveliness, romantic setting, and historical as­ sociation. In the heart of these mountains is the Shenandoah National Park, established in 1935, the first wilderness area east of the Mis­ sissippi to be created a national park. Comprising 182,854 acres, the park extends for 75 miles in a narrow strip along the crest of the Blue Ridge from Front Royal on the northeast to the vicinity of Waynesboro on the southeast. The altitude varies from 600 feet above sea level at the north entrance to 4,049 feet at the summit of Hawksbill Mountain. The Skyline Drive It is for the far-reaching views from the Skyline Drive that the park is most widely known. The drive, macadamized and smooth, with an easy gradient and wide, sweeping curves, unfolds to view innumerable sweeping pano­ ramas of lofty peaks, forested ravines, meander­ ing streams, and the green and brown patchwork A TYPICAL SECTION OF THE FAMOUS SKYLINE DRIVE fields of the valley farms below. SHOWING THE EASY GRADIENT AND FLOWING CURVES. Virginia Conservation Commission Photo Built at a cost of more than $4,500,000, the famous 97-mile scenic highway traverses the LATE AFTERNOON ON SKYLINE DRIVE. KAWKSBILL, HIGH­ entire length of the park along the backbone of EST POINT IN THE PARK, IS SILHOUETTED IN THE DISTANCE. the Blue Ridge from Front Royal to Jarman Virginia State Chamber of Commerce Photo Gap, where it connects with the 485-mile Blue Ridge Parkway, now under construction, that will link Shenandoah National Park with the Great Smoky Mountains National Park in Tennessee and North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Volcanism at Yellowstone Caldera: Insights from Geochemistry of Young Volcanic Units and Monitoring of Volcanic Unrest
    2012 Annual Meeting & Exposition Issue! SEPTEMBER 2012 | VOL. 22, NO. 9 A PUBLICATION OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA® Future volcanism at Yellowstone caldera: Insights from geochemistry of young volcanic units and monitoring of volcanic unrest Inside: Preliminary Announcement and Call for Papers: 2013 GSA Northeastern Section Meeting, p. 38 Preliminary Announcement and Call for Papers: 2013 GSA Southeastern Section Meeting, p. 41 VOLUME 22, NUMBER 9 | 2012 SEPTEMBER SCIENCE ARTICLE GSA TODAY (ISSN 1052-5173 USPS 0456-530) prints news and information for more than 25,000 GSA member read- ers and subscribing libraries, with 11 monthly issues (April/ May is a combined issue). GSA TODAY is published by The Geological Society of America® Inc. (GSA) with offices at 3300 Penrose Place, Boulder, Colorado, USA, and a mail- ing address of P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140, USA. 4 Future volcanism at Yellowstone GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, caldera: Insights from geochemistry regardless of race, citizenship, gender, sexual orientation, of young volcanic units and religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this monitoring of volcanic unrest publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Guillaume Girard and John Stix © 2012 The Geological Society of America Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright not claimed on content prepared Cover: View looking west into the Midway geyser wholly by U.S. government employees within the scope of basin of Yellowstone caldera (foreground) and the West their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or request to GSA, to use a single Yellowstone rhyolite lava flow (background).
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday, August 27, 2009
    Report No. 70-1-44 February 1970 5230 STATUS OF THE BALSAM WOOLLY APHID IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS-1969 By John L. Rauschenberger and H.L. Lambert U.S. Fore st Service Asheville, North Carolina ABSTRACT During 1969, established infestations of the balsam woolly aphid on State, Private and Federal lands continued to thrive and new ones were detected. Only the fir type of Mount Rogers in Virginia continues through 1969 to be free of aphid infestation. Emphasis was placed, during 1969, on establish­ ment of protection boundaries around accessible, high value stands of fir. Protective spraying has been discontinued and the policy has become one of spraying only actively infested trees. Intensive trapping procedures carried out in the respective protection areas revealed two areas of infestations on Roan Mountain, one on Mount Mitchell and also infestations on fir seed trees in the Linville River Forestry Facility at Crossnore, North Carolina. The aerial and ground phase of the 1969 balsam woolly aphid evaluation covered 60,000 acres of host type. INTRODUCTION The balsam woolly aphid, Adel r;es pl ce ae Ratz. was accidentally introduced into North America in the early 1900' s and detected in North Garolina in 195 7 ( Speers, 19 5 8). Since that time the aphid has become established in every major area of host fir type in the three state area of North Garolina, Virginia and Tennessee with the single exception of a 500-acre fir stand on Mount Rogers National Recreation Area in Virginia ( Fig. 1). The two native species of fir which serve as host in the Southern Appalachians are Fraser, Ables fras e rt ( Pursh.
    [Show full text]
  • Climbing Guidelines in Shenandoah National Park
    Shenandoah National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 2/2018 Climbing Guidelines Overview People are drawn to Shenandoah National Park Rock climbing is a unique experience that for many different reasons; some want to take creates a special bond between the climber and in the beautiful scenery along Skyline Drive, the rock face. To have a great experience and others want to enjoy nature and the feelings of ensure that those after you do as well, follow solitude and renewal that wilderness brings. the guidelines and recommendations below. Why Guidelines? The Shenandoah Climbing Management These guidelines will allow us to: Guidelines have been developed to protect • Manage recreational use. Shenandoah’s natural resources, while also • Protect natural resources. providing visitors opportunities for rock • Provide climbing opportunities in the Park. climbing, bouldering, and ice climbing within • Protect the backcountry and wilderness the Park. experiences of other Park visitors. Rules & Regulations Prohibited Activities: Fixed Anchors (including belay/rappel • Using motorized equipment to place bolts, stations): anchors or climbing equipment Fixed anchors are prohibited in all locations • Chipping or gluing. where temporary, removable protection can be • Removing vegetation to “clean” or improve a used. The installation of fixed anchors should route, or access to a route. be rare parkwide, especially in wilderness areas. • Leaving fixed ropes or other equipment for longer than 24 hours. Group Size Limits: • Using non-climbing specific hardware (i.e., Groups may contain a maximum of 12 people. concrete anchors, home-made equipment). Emergency 1-800-732-0911 • Information 540-999-3500 • Online www.nps.gov/shen Rules & Regulations If forced to install a fixed belay and/or Trees as Anchors: (continued) rappel station, follow these rules: Do not cause physical damage to trees or plants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Regional Phylogenies in Exploring the Structure of Plant Assemblages
    The use of regional phylogenies in exploring the structure of plant assemblages Tammy L. Elliott Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biology McGill University Montr´eal, Qu´ebec, Canada 2015-09-015 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy c Copyright Tammy L. Elliott, 2015 All rights reserved Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my parents, who sadly both left this world much to early. I like to dream that you are both enjoying your time together in a place with no worries, where you can enjoy all of the wonderful things in life. Dad—Although you left us when we were so young, I daily cherish the special times the two of us spent together. The memories of exploring the countryside, visiting neighbours, caring for the pigs and skipping school to fish are always close to my heart. Mom—I miss your strength, interesting perspective (albeit humorously pessimistic), no-nonsense attitude towards life and listening ear. I hope that you are finding ways to enjoy your grandchildren and tend your beautiful gardens. I would like to assure you that yes—one day I will have a full-time job. If Roses grow in Heaven Lord, please pick a bunch for me. Place them in my Mother’s arms and tell her they’re from me. Tell her that I love her and miss her, and when she turns to smile, place a kiss upon her cheek and hold her for awhile Because remembering her is easy, I do it every day, but there’s an ache within my heart that will never go away.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2005 U.S
    National Park Service Visitor Guide - Fall 2005 U.S. Department of the Interior Shenandoah National Park Shenandoah Overlook Beauty Comes Naturally Here Park Emergency Number: (800)732-0911 Imagine having to look through a hole in a In 1924, a commission searched to find an area fence to view a beautiful waterfall to create a western-like national park more accessible to the large eastern population. The Inside ... It happened at our first world-renowned Blue Ridge offered the solitude of wilderness, Things To Know While You're Here 2-3 natural wonder, Niagara Falls. Private the wonder of wildflowers, calming brooks Waterfalls of Shenandoah 4-5 landowners built commercial structures and and streams, the amazement of the stealth of a Visitor Services 6 barriers that blocked access. bobcat, or the inspiration of hawks in flight. Historically Speaking 7 Ranger Programs 8 Imagine sitting on the balcony of a hotel, Vacationers have been drawn to the natural viewing a majestic waterfall through a clear-cut wonders of the Blue Ridge, such as the six swath of trees. It happened at Yosemite Falls, waterfalls of rugged Whiteoak Canyon, for Leash Your Dog which was "turning into a great swindle like over 100 years. Early on, one entrepreneur | in Shenandoah! Niagara ... for fleecing the public." The built a changing house and swimming pool (see"Pets in the degradation of these areas helped spur the near the top of Whiteoak Falls to enhance the Park" on page 2) movement for scenic preservation in America. visitors' experience. Quick Facts about Shenandoah: Another waterfall led more directly to the Since Shenandoah National Park's establish­ creation of our first national park.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Vascular Plant Species in the Nova Scotia Flora
    A list of vascular plant species in the Nova Scotia flora AFTER the page below was posted, The Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre posted their authoritative lists of Species Ranks for vascualar and non-vascular plants and for invertebrate and vertebrate animals for each of the Atlantic Provinces. See ACCDC Species Ranks. The page below remains posted for the time-being, but visitors are advised that the ACCDC Species Ranks pages are the better ones to consult. A list of native and naturalized vascular plant species in Nova Scotia was generated from Wild Species 2005: The General Status of Species in Canada using the General Status Search Tool. See Wild Species 2005:General Status Summaries:Vascular Plants for details about the listings. The Report parameters were: Report: "Ferns (2005), Orchids (2005), Vascular Plants (2005)" Status: "At risk, May be at risk, Sensitive, Secure, Undetermined, Not assessed, Exotic" Range: "NS" A total of 1657 records matched those criteria. The conservation rankings and number of species within each rank were as follows: Rank Description No. Species 1 At Risk 8 2 May Be At Risk 127 3 Sensitive 136 4 Secure 694 5 Undetermined 96 6 Not Assessed 0 7 Exotic 596 The list is convenient for looking up scientific names of species for which you have a common name or vice versa, also to see a list of all species within a family. Use your browser's FIND function to find a name within the page. Limitations Please note that only one common name for each species is given, also that synonyms for the scientific names are not listed.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Setting & History
    Section 3 Regional Setting & History Section 3: Regional Setting & History 9 Regional Setting The Town of Luray is located in Page County, and is situated near the geographic center of the County.. This location has contributed favorably to Luray’s function as a cultural and economic center for the surrounding region. The 2010 U.S. Census reported that the Town of Luray had a population of 4,895 residents. Page County lies in the eastern half of the Shenandoah Valley. On its eastern border are the Blue Ridge Mountains; on its western border is the Massanutten Mountain range; and in between flows the South Fork of the Shenandoah River. The mountains and Topography & Climate valley area abound in scenic beauty and offer a multitude of natural Luray’s topography is primarily rolling hills with elevations varying outdoor recreational opportunities. Shenandoah National Park, from 800 feet to 1,000 feet. The surrounding landscape in Page with its mountain crest of Skyline Drive, extends along the Blue County is mountainous terrain with elevations as high as 4,000 Ridge Mountains to the east. Additionally, the Town of Luray is feet at the Hawksbill Mountain. The Hawksbill Creek flows the location of the internationally-known “Luray Caverns.” through the Town, and is a tributary of the South Fork of the Because of these and other attractions, visitors are drawn to the Shenandoah River. The Creek and the South Fork merge Luray area year-round. approximately six miles to the north of Luray. The headwaters of the Hawksbill Creek begin on the steep, wooded slopes of the Blue Ridge Mountains.
    [Show full text]