Sibilants in Gujarati Phonology (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sibilants in Gujarati Phonology (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--) QUICK DESIGN GUIDE QUICK TIPS (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--) Sibilants in Gujarati Phonology (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--) This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 48”x96” professional Purnima Thakur This PowerPoint template requires basic PowerPoint (version 2007 or poster. It will save you valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, The Graduate Center, CUNY newer) skills. Below is a list of commonly asked questions specific to and graphics. this template. [email protected] If you are using an older version of PowerPoint some template Use it to create your presentation. Then send it to features may not work properly. PosterPresentations.com for premium quality, same day affordable BACKGROUND THE PPRM PRODUCTION STUDY RESULTS printing. • 8 speakers displayed a quasi-phonemic contrast (H 0.857 - 0.482) Using the template Gujarati, a regional language spoken in India (classified as a New Indo-Aryan The Probabilistic Phonological Relationship Model Participants: 20 multilingual Gujarati speakers (18 - 29 o.a.) • Systemic entropies (H) ranged between 0.482 and 1.000 language) is not rich in native fricatives. Most analyses of Gujarati assume We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the • It accounts for intermediate phonological relationships between pairs of • 12 speakers showed near perfect contrast (H 1.000 - 0.943) • No evidence of allophonic distribution as none had a systemic entropy score of 0.000 alveolar /s/, alveo-patal /ʃ/, and glottal /h/. segments that fall somewhere between “fully contrastive” and “fully Verifying the quality of your graphics poster design process and answer your poster production questions. Word reading task: Participants read out words embedded in a carrier phrase allophonic.” Həve ________ bolo (“Now ____say”) Go to the VIEW menu and click on ZOOM to set your preferred Three differing views on the status of sibilants in Gujarati. • It is based on the twin concepts of probability and entropy (uncertainty), a magnification. This template is at 50% the size of the final poster. All View our online tutorials at: 1. Single sibilant /s/ and allophonic [ʃ]: Sibilant contrast historically concept borrowed from Information Theory. Materials: 90 familiar Gujarati words targeting sibilants /s/ and /ʃ/ in text and graphics will be printed at 200% their size. To see what your http://bit.ly/Poster_creation_help neutralized in all environments. Alveo-palatal [ʃ] appears as an allophone • Three basic components of the PPRM: word-initial, word-medial, and word-final positions. poster will look like when printed, set the zoom to 200% and evaluate (copy and paste the link into your web browser). of /s/ before front vowels /i,ɛ,e/ and glide /j/ (Turner, 1921; Grierson, (i) PROBABILITY of occurrence of one of the two sounds in a particular the quality of all your graphics before you submit your poster for 1931). environment; a bias towards X vs. Y in a given environment. A. Simple onset contrasts (40 words) printing. For assistance and to order your printed poster call 2. Phoneme /s/ and quasi-phoneme /ʃ/: Sibilant contrast neutralized in all (ii) ENVIRONMENTAL ENTROPY: measures degree of uncertainty of environments except before front vowels and glide. /s/ and /ʃ/ contrast choice between a pair of sounds, X and Y, in a certain environment. front vowels ʃijalo „cold‟ sitaro „planet‟ PosterPresentations.com at 1.866.649.3004 before front vowels /i,ɛ,e/ and glide /j/, and elsewhere only /s/ appears (iii) SYSTEMIC ENTROPY: measures uncertainty of choice between two ʃekvũ „to roast‟ sevvũ „to serve‟ Using the placeholders (Pandit, 1954). segments, X and Y, across all environments or the entire system. back vowels ʃubʰ „auspicious‟ sukʰ „happiness‟ To add text to this template click inside a placeholder and type in or 3. Phonemes /s/ and /ʃ/: The sibilants are considered truly contrastive, due to PROBABILITY of occurrence of X in environment e, limiting possibilities ʃodʰək „examiner‟ sogən „promise‟ paste your text. To move a placeholder, click on it once (to select it), the existence of some minimal pairs like [sal] „hindrance‟~ [ʃal] „shawl‟, [pas] „near‟ ~ [paʃ] „bondage‟, and [oresjo] „pebble‟ ~ [kəɭəʃjo] „big glass‟ to X and Y: low vowel ʃãnt „quiet‟ sãnɟ „evening‟ place your cursor on its frame and your cursor will change to this Object Placeholders central vowel ʃəŋka „doubt‟ səŋkʰja „number‟ (Adenwala, 1965; Dave, 1977; Masica, 1991) p(X; X, Y │e) = NX/e / (NX/e + NY/e) symbol: Then, click once and drag it to its new location where Near Perfect Contrast Group Quasi-phonemic Contrast Group you can resize it as needed. Additional placeholders can be found on • 8 speakers contrasted sibilants in all given environments (they showed a Front vowels /i, ɛ, e/ Probability Range: 0 to 1 B. Medial onset contrasts with glide (10 words) the left side of this template. Use the placeholders provided below to add new elements to your ISSUE slight [s]- or [ʃ]-bias in certain environments (H(e) > 0.971 < 1.000), which • Only 2 speakers showed the predicted contrast udeʃjə „advice‟ aləsjə „laziness‟ poster: Drag a placeholder onto the poster area, size it, and click it to is treated as noise in the data) • Of the remaining, 3 were [s]-biased and 3 [ʃ]-biased. Modifying the layout edit. ENVIRONMENTAL ENTROPY SYSTEMIC ENTROPY • Remaining 4 speakers contrasted sibilants in almost all environments, Glide /j/ Does Gujarati have three distinct fricative systems synchronically C. Simple coda contrasts (20 words) except one – a strong bias towards either [s] or [ʃ] in these environments • No contrast observed, all 8 speakers produced [ʃ], indicating this is an This template has four different H = - ∑ pi log2 pi Σ (H(e) * p(e)) with individual speakers acquiring different ones? syllable-final məʃkəri „fun‟ təskəri „theft‟ was noted. environment for palatalization. column layouts. Right-click your Section Header placeholder word-final vivəʃ „dependant‟ divəs „day‟ Mouse on the background and a. H(e) = - Σ p log p Other environments Use section headers to separate topics or concepts within your pi is the probability of each segment (X i 2 i !! Interesting Observations Three distinct fricative systems in Gujarati • 4 speakers were [s]-biased and 4 were [ʃ]-biased click on “Layout” to see the layout presentation. and Y) in the given environment. b. p(e) = Ne / Σ Ne Є E Phonetic conditioning (i) s h [ʃ] is an allophone of /s/ D. Coda contrasts with plosives (20 words) options. The columns in the provided • Speaker G5: strong [ʃ]-bias when followed by velar /k/ (H(e) 0.881) (ii) s (ʃ) h /ʃ/ is a quasi-phoneme syllable-final raʂʈrə „nation‟ vəstrə „clothing‟ ‼ Interesting Observations layouts are fixed and cannot be moved but advanced users can modify Entropy Range: 0 to 1 (0 no uncertainty = allophony, 1complete Sanskrit Ruki Rule. 3 speakers (G10, G16 and G9) showed a distribution similar to that (iii) s ʃ h /s/ and /ʃ/ are contrastive uncertainty = contrast) prətiʂʈʰa „prestige‟ vjəvəstʰa „arrangement‟ any layout by going to VIEW and then SLIDE MASTER. • E14: strong [ʃ]-bias when followed by glide /j/ (H(e) 0.722) /j/ trigger predicted for the allophonic group: word-final bʰrəʂʈ „corrupted‟ trəst „frightened‟ for palatalization. • Entropy and Probability both are defined over pairs of segments in a • always produced [ʃ] in context of glide /j/ language system. vəriʂʈʰ „senior‟ gruhəstʰ „householder‟ Not readily explained Importing text and graphics from external sources Text placeholder • Traditional models of phonological relationships, based on a binary • almost always produced [s] in other contexts • While two probabilities are required to understand the relationship • E3: strong [s]-bias when followed by retroflex /ʈ, ʈʰ/ (H(e) 0.8111), a TEXT: Paste or type your text into a pre-existing placeholder or drag Move this preformatted text placeholder to the poster to add a new distinction between predictably distributed (allophonic) and not predictably HOWEVER, G10 showed contrast in the context of back vowels; and between a pair of segments, entropy offers a single measure to capture context for palatalization. in a new placeholder from the left side of the template. Move it body of text. distributed (contrastive), can successfully predict two of the three possible G16 and G9 in the environment of codas with plosives. fricative systems. the relationship. Data Analysis • E13: strong [ʃ]-bias in the environment of low vowels (H(e) 0.5444) anywhere as needed. • They, however, don‟t easily capture a possible third system – one with • They are used in conjunction to examine the notion of phonological • Based on perceptual judgments of four raters (author and three others), PHOTOS: Drag in a picture placeholder, size it first, click in it and quasi-phonemic distinctions between the two sibilants. contrast. utterances were coded on a scale of 1-2-3 (1 = [s], 3 = [ʃ], 2 = ambiguous insert a photo from the menu. • A probabilistic measure, rather than a binary measure is needed to define token). An equal number of items with [s] and [ʃ] were included in the DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION TABLES: You can copy and paste a table from an external document PRODUCTION STUDY analysis. predictability of distribution. • Evidence was found for at least two possible fricative systems in Gujarati: • The production study taps into the use of grammatical knowledge. To onto this poster template. To make the text fit better in the cells of Picture placeholder • “Majority wins” strategy applied to ambiguous tokens showing 75-25% • The Probabilistic Phonological Relationship Model (PPRM) proposed by near perfect, and quasi-phonemic, and a tendency towards a possible third: confirm the precise detail of the sibilant grammar, a future study should also Hypotheses split: if 3 out of 4 raters agreed token was [s], it was coded as 1 an imported table, right-click on the table, click FORMAT SHAPE then Move this graphic placeholder onto your poster, size it first, and then Hall (2009), based on a continuous scale of predictability, calculates the allophonic.
Recommended publications
  • The Phonetics of Contrastive Phonation in Gujarati$
    Journal of Phonetics ] (]]]]) ]]]–]]] Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Phonetics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/phonetics The phonetics of contrastive phonation in Gujarati$ Sameer ud Dowla Khan n Department of Linguistics, Reed College, 3203 SE Woodstock Boulevard, Portland, OR 97202-8199, USA article info abstract Article history: The current study examines (near-)minimal pairs of breathy and modal phonation produced by ten Received 20 December 2011 native speakers of Gujarati in connected speech, across different vowel qualities and separated by nine Received in revised form equal timepoints of vowel duration. The results identify five spectral measures (i.e. H1–H2, H2–H4, 3 July 2012 H1–A1, H1–A2, H1–A3), four noise measures (i.e. cepstral peak prominence and three measures of Accepted 9 July 2012 harmonics-to-noise ratio), and one electroglottographic measure (i.e. CQ) as reliable indicators of breathy phonation, revealing a considerably larger inventory of cues to breathy phonation than what had previously been reported for the language. Furthermore, while the spectral measures are consistently distinct for breathy and modal vowels when averaging across timepoints, the efficacy of the four noise measures in distinguishing phonation categories is localized to the midpoint of the vowel’s duration. This indicates that the magnitude of breathiness, especially in terms of aperiodicity, changes as a function of time. The current study supports that breathy voice in Gujarati is a dynamic, multidimensional
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Prefix
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Prefix independence: typology and theory A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Linguistics by Noah Eli Elkins 2020 © Copyright by Noah Eli Elkins 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Prefix independence: typology and theory by Noah Eli Elkins Master of Arts in Linguistics University of California, Los Angeles, 2020 Professor Bruce Hayes, Co-Chair Professor Kie Zuraw, Co-Chair The prefix-suffix asymmetry is an imbalance in the application of phonological processes whereby prefixes are less phonologically cohering to their roots than suffixes. This thesis presents a large- scale typological survey of processes which are sensitive to this asymmetry. Results suggest that prefixes’ relative phonological aloofness (independence) constitutes a widespread and robust generalization, perhaps more so than previously realized. In terms of analysis, I argue that the key concept is the special prominence of initial syllables, supported by much evidence from phonetics, psycholinguistics, and phonology itself. My formal treatment consists of constraint families that serve to support such prominence. I propose that a highly-ranked CRISPEDGE constraint (Itô & Mester 1999) relativized to the left edge of root-initial syllables can account for much of the typological data. This proposal rests on the fact that root-initial syllables constitute a privileged position in phonological grammars (e.g. ii Beckman 1998, Becker et al. 2012), and so to maximize the efficacy of the root-initial percept, segments are hesitant to share their features leftward to target prefixes – and vice versa – as this would blur the strong root-initial boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Arts by Research
    University of Huddersfield Repository Fadia, Safiyyah The influence of Gujarati on the VOT of English stops Original Citation Fadia, Safiyyah (2018) The influence of Gujarati on the VOT of English stops. Masters thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/34521/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Safiyyah Fadia THE INFLUENCE OF GUJARATI ON THE VOT OF ENGLISH STOPS Safiyyah Fadia Thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield for the degree of Master of Arts by Research October 2017 1 Safiyyah Fadia ABSTRACT This thesis is an acoustic study of three generations of women from the Gujarati-English community in Batley, West Yorkshire (United Kingdom). The literature pertaining to Gujarati is very limited, hence this thesis aims to solve some unanswered queries regarding our understanding of the influence of Gujarati on English stop productions.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogical Classification of New Indo-Aryan Languages and Lexicostatistics
    Anton I. Kogan Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia, Moscow); [email protected] Genealogical classification of New Indo-Aryan languages and lexicostatistics Genetic relations among Indo-Aryan languages are still unclear. Existing classifications are often intuitive and do not rest upon rigorous criteria. In the present article an attempt is made to create a classification of New Indo-Aryan languages, based on up-to-date lexicosta- tistical data. The comparative analysis of the resulting genealogical tree and traditional clas- sifications allows the author to draw conclusions about the most probable genealogy of the Indo-Aryan languages. Keywords: Indo-Aryan languages, language classification, lexicostatistics, glottochronology. The Indo-Aryan group is one of the few groups of Indo-European languages, if not the only one, for which no classification based on rigorous genetic criteria has been suggested thus far. The cause of such a situation is neither lack of data, nor even the low level of its historical in- terpretation, but rather the existence of certain prejudices which are widespread among In- dologists. One of them is the belief that real genetic relations between the Indo-Aryan lan- guages cannot be clarified because these languages form a dialect continuum. Such an argu- ment can hardly seem convincing to a comparative linguist, since dialect continuum is by no means a unique phenomenon: it is characteristic of many regions, including those where Indo- European languages are spoken, e.g. the Slavic and Romance-speaking areas. Since genealogi- cal classifications of Slavic and Romance languages do exist, there is no reason to believe that the taxonomy of Indo-Aryan languages cannot be established.
    [Show full text]
  • L a B P H O N 9, University of Illinois, 2004
    L a b P h o n 9, University of Illinois, 2004 Ninth Conference on Laboratory Phonology Change in Phonology Thursday 24 June - Saturday 26 June, 2004 LabPhon 9 hosts Please follow this link to the visit the 10th Conference on Laboratory Phonology page: Variation, Detail and Representation Location Important Dates Welcome to the 9th Conference on Laboratory Phonology Program Committee LabPhon is an international forum for interdisciplinary research on the sound structure of languages. Conference Grants Participants in LabPhon seek to communicate across the traditional boundaries that separate phonology, as a branch of theoretical linguistics, from the study of speech production, speech perception, spoken Downloads language acquisition, computer speech processing, and other disciplines concerned with human speech. Schedule [pdf] The theme for LabPhon 9, Change in Phonology, addresses questions related to the evolution of Shuttle Service language within a speech community and the development of language within the individual Style Guidelines speaker/hearer, and includes issues of broad social interest, such as child language development, [pdf] language pedagogy, and technologies for human-computer interaction. Themes and Invited Participants Acquisition as change: L1 phonology LouAnn Gerken, University of Arizona , invited speaker Stefan Frisch, University of South Florida, discussant Phonological models of variation in computer speech processing Julia Hirschberg, Columbia University, invited speaker Carol Espy-Wilson, University of Maryland,
    [Show full text]
  • Saurashtra University Library Service
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Etheses - A Saurashtra University Library Service Saurashtra University Re – Accredited Grade ‘B’ by NAAC (CGPA 2.93) Vyas, Ketan B., 2010, A Comparative Study of English and Gujarati Phonological Systems, thesis PhD, Saurashtra University http://etheses.saurashtrauniversity.edu/id/eprint/125 Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Saurashtra University Theses Service http://etheses.saurashtrauniversity.edu [email protected] © The Author A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENGLISH AND GUJARATI PHONOLOGICAL SYSTEMS DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO SAURASHTRA UNIVERSITY RAJKOT FOR THE AWARD OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ENGLISH Supervised by : Submitted by : Dr. Anupam R. Nagar Ketan B. Vyas Principal, Lecturer in English, Dr. V.R.G. College for Girls, Shri G. K. & C. K. Bosamia Porbandar. Arts & Commerce College, Jetpur. Registration No. 3606 2010 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that this dissertation on A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENGLISH AND GUJARATI PHONOLOGICAL SYSTEMS is submitted by Mr. Ketan B. Vyas for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the faculty of Arts of Saurashtra University, Rajkot.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological Contrastive Analysis of Supra- Segmental Features RP and GIE with Special Focus on Gujarati Phonology
    ELT VOICES – INDIA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR TEACHERS OF ENGLISH JUNE 2014 | VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3 | ISSN 2230-9136 (PRINT) 2321-7170 (ONLINE) Phonological Contrastive Analysis of Supra- Segmental Features RP and GIE with Special Focus on Gujarati Phonology PARESH JOSHI Department of English, Christ College, Rajkot, India ABSTRACT Present paper is an endeavour to investigate underlying differences in supra-segmental features of Received Pronunciation (RP) and General Indian English (GIE), particularly Gujarati English Phonology (GEP). The analysis takes into consideration peculiar features of all the three phonologies i.e. RP, GIE and phonology of Gujarati English. Although a contrastive analysis of RP and GIE will bring out gross phonological peculiarities of all the Indian Speakers of English including Gujarati Speakers of English (GSE), the rationale for such a contrastive analysis is to arrive at gross phonological features which are very peculiar to GSE under the influence of Gujarati phonology with a view to devising pedagogical strategies to resolve pronunciation problems pertaining to supra-segmental phonology there by enhancing the international intelligibility of GSE. Key words: Contrastive Analysis, Supra-Segmental Phonology, Received Pronunciation (RP), General Indian English (GIE), Gujarati English Phonology (GEP), Non-native speakers (NNS), Guajarati Speakers of English ELT VOICES – INDIA June 2014 | Volume 4, Issue 3 It is well known that no two languages can ever be identical in its phonology. Evidently, each language has some uniquely peculiar phonological features which are exclusive within themselves and different from other languages. Usually these phonological peculiarities pose innumerable challenges to the non-native speakers (NNS), initially in acquisition and later in the articulation of the second language.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Grammar of Apabhramsa
    DELHI UNIVERSITY LIBRARY CINoP\'5\'3 Ac No ^ Date of release fot loan This book should be returned on or before the date last stamped below An overdue charge of 0 5 nP will be charged for each ^ day the book is kep‘ overtime HISTORICAL GRAMMAR OF APADHRAM&A Deccan College Dissertation Series 5 HISTORICAL GRAMMAR of, APABHRAMSA by G. V. TAGARE DECCAN COLLEGE POST-GRADUATE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE POONA HISTORICAL GRAMMAR OF APABHRAMSA By GANESH VASUDEV TAGARE B.T., M.A , PH.D. (bOMEAY) Director of Public IriilrtcU'in, Flior Slate POONA 19 4S CODE No. 0 i First Edition ; 750 <ei^, August 1948 Prl«« : Rb. 21 AH Rights Reserved Pri.'^Led by S. Athaiob at the Examii^r Prmi, Medows Street^ Fort, Bombay, and publi&hed by Dr. .S. M. Katre £Dr the Deccan Collrge Post-graduate and Research Institute, 10 Connaught Road, Poona 1. MOST RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED TO H. H. RAJA SHRMANT SIR RAGUNATHRAO SHAMXABRAO alias BABASAHEB PANDIT PANT SACHIV. K.CiS. RAJASAHEB OF BHOR FOR ms GENEROUS PATRONAGE TO LEARNING CONTENTS Page Frontispiece Dedication . , . , . v Preface ix Abbreviations xiii Introduction 1 Chapter I. ApabhramU Phonology 39 Chapter II. Declension in Apabhramsa . , . 104 Chapter III. Conjugation in Apabhram^a . , , 282 Chapter IV. Nominal Stem-Formation in Apabhram^a 335 Index Verborum ., .. .. 343 ,PRE.f AQE Jlie present dlssertaribn oh ApabhraASa was accepted by dw Iffllverthy dfRottibay tm the degree of Ph.t». In September, It required six long years to complete this .work as I was then workin|g as a,secondary teacher at Shor where there are no library facilities for sp(di type of research work.
    [Show full text]
  • Subversion Or Convergence? the Issue of Pre-Vedic Retroflexion Reexamined*
    Studies in the Linguistic Sciences Volume 23, Number 2. Fall 1993 [publ. October 1996] SUBVERSION OR CONVERGENCE? THE ISSUE OF PRE-VEDIC RETROFLEXION REEXAMINED* Hans Henrich Hock I* dv^; I tricot? Id '^^ \j\\rM'->m: (Sankaracarya'sbhasyaonChandogya-Upanisad5.18.l) As is well known, members of at least six distinct language fami- lies in South Asia have come to converge to a remarkable degree in their overall structure through millennia of hi- and multilingual contact. Most of the convergence has been in the syntax, but one phonological phenomenon, a contrast between dental and retroflex consonants (as in Skt. dJ- 'shine' : dl- 'fly'), has the distinction of having been noticed earliest (Pott 1833, 1836). It is this phe- nomenon which I address in this paper. Some scholars (most recently Thomason & Kaufman 1988, Kuiper 1991; see also and especially Emeneau 1980) argue that the source of retroflexion is Dravidian, for the dental : retroflex contrast can be reconstructed for Proto-Dravidian, while the ancestors of the other languages are said to have lacked it. Since the contrast is found in the earliest attested stage of Indo-Aryan, Vedic Sanskrit, conver- gence between Indo-Aryan and Dravidian must therefore have begun in the second millennium B.C., in terms of a SUBVERSION (my term) of Indo-Aryan by Dravidian. In earlier publications (e.g. Hock 1975, 1984) I claimed that the arguments for early convergence are not cogent, since the Sanskrit dental : retroflex contrast can be explained by internal Indo-Aryan developments. Moreover, the contrast appears to be an innovation not only in Indo-Aryan, but also in Dravidian.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological Contrastive Analysis of Consonant and Vowel Phonemes of R.P
    ‘ELT Voices – India’ International Journal for Teachers of English Volume (4), Issue (6), 11-19 (2014) ISSN Number: 2230-9136 (http://www.eltvoices.in) Phonological Contrastive Analysis of Consonant and Vowel Phonemes of R.P. and GIE with Special Focus on Gujarati Phonology Dr. Paresh Joshi Dept. of English, Christ College, Rajkot, India [email protected] Reference Joshi, P. (2014). Phonological Contrastive Analysis of Consonant and Vowel Phonemes of R.P. and GIE with Special Focus on Gujarati Phonology. ELT Voices, 4(6), 11-19 Abstract Present paper is an endeavor to investigate underlying differences in segmental phonology of Received Pronunciation (RP) and General Indian English (GIE) with special focus on Gujarati English Phonology (GEP). The analysis takes into consid- eration peculiar features of all the three phonologies i.e. RP, GIE and phonology of Gujarati English. Although a contrastive analysis of RP and GIE brings out gross phonological peculiarities of all the Indian Speakers of English including Gujarati Speakers of English (GSE), the rationale for such a contrastive analysis is to arrive at gross segmental phonological features which are very peculiar to Gujarati Speakers of English (GSE) under the influence of Gu- jarati phonology with a view to devising pedagogical strategies to resolve pronunciation problems pertaining to segmental phonology there by enhancing the international intelligibility of GSE. Key Words: Contrastive Analysis, Supra-Segmental Phonology, General Indian English (GIE), Gujarati English Phonolo- gy (GEP), Non-native speakers (NNS), Native Speakers, Guajarati Speakers of English, and Received Pronunciation (RP). 1. Introduction English has a very strange history in India. What was seen as an oppressor’s language initially has been nativized to the extent that it has become an official language and has emerged as the second most spoken language within the country, second only to Hindi which is the national language.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronal Features and Retroflexion in Indo-Aryan Languages
    Coronal features and retroflexion in Indo-Aryan languages Paul Arsenault University of Toronto May 20, 2008 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Generals Paper 2 Subject: Phonology Supervisor: Keren Rice Readers: Alexei Kochetov, Yoonjung Kang Coronal features and retroflexion in Indo-Aryan languages Paul Arsenault University of Toronto Hamann (2003) identifies several articulatory properties of retroflexion, three of which correspond to distinctive features commonly employed in the literature: posteriority ([–anterior]), apicality ([–distributed]) and retraction ([+back]). I use phonological activity as a diagnostic to determine which of these features are phonologically distinctive for retroflex segments in Indo-Aryan languages. The evidence suggests that retroflex segments in these languages are distinctively apical ([–distributed]), and potentially retracted ([+back]) at a post-lexical level. There is no evidence for [–anterior] at any level of representation. In light of similar findings reported in Dravidian and Australian languages with larger coronal place inventories, I argue that this is not a case of contrastive (under) specification. Rather, I suggest that posteriority ([–anterior]) may be a universally redundant and non-essential property of retroflexion that is derived from the combination of apicality ([–distributed]) and retraction ([+back]). Some implications for models of coronal place features are briefly discussed. 1. Introduction In the phonological literature, three phonological features are commonly used to account for retroflex segments and other coronal places of articulation: [±anterior], [±distributed] and [±back]. In this paper, I use phonological activity as a diagnostic to determine which of these three features are phonologically distinctive for retroflex segments in Indo-Aryan languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Akkadian and Amorite Phonology Giorgio Buccellati University of California, Los Angeles
    Chapter 1 Akkadian and Amorite Phonology Giorgio Buccellati University of California, Los Angeles 1.1. The graphemic base 1.1.1. The writing medium Akkadian and Amorite are dead languages, in the specific sense that their speakers died out around 1600 B.C. (for Amorite) and 600 B.C. (for Akka- dian). Our reconstruction of both languages is thus based exclusively on the written record, cxcept for the inferences that may be drawn from the fact that they are related to other Semitic languages for which there are infor- mants. The written medium, though rich in information, presents consider- able limitations which must be taken into account. In addition, two other filters must be reckoned with, particularly in any discussion of phonology. (A) The writing system was not originally developed for a Semitic lan- guage, but rather for Sumerian. The process of adaptation to Semitic was gradual and organic, and was not governed by a-priori linguistic considera- tions. Especially in the early periods, the scribes, who were conversant with Sumerian, maintained the basic graphemic oppositions which were best suit- ed for Sumerian and subsumed under them a variety of Semitic oppositions. For instance, it has been suggested (Gelb 1961: 31-33) that Sumerian had an opposition between stops (without distinction of voice) and aspirates; this two-way graphemic opposition was used to render a three-way opposi- tion, in Akkadian, between voiced, voiceless, and emphatics. (An interesting AUTHOR'SNOTE: I wish to thank the editor of this volume, Alan S. Kaye, for his thoughtful comments on the first version of my manuscript, and for various substantive and biblio- graphical suggestions.
    [Show full text]