DOCSLIB.ORG

The Implication of Downtown Auto-Restricted Projects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Implication of Downtown Auto-Restricted Projects HE 203 The Implementation of . A56 Department no. •ansportation Downtown Auto- Restricted 84-33 Projects June 1984 NOTE: This report is an review of key issues associated with auto- restricted zones and downtown revitalization. Part of its content includes program and other recommendations based upon this contractor's perception of the issues involved. Recognizing that there may be many alternative approaches to resolving transportation problems, these positions may not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Government. As such, no endorsement of these recommendations is either expressed or implied by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The Implementation of Downtown Auto- Restricted Projects Final Report June 1984 Prepared by Philippos J. .Loukissas.and Stuart H. Mann ''Community Studies Program The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 1 DEPARTMENT of transportation 3 0 1984 Prepared for OCT Office of Management, Research, LIBRARY and Transit Services Urban Mass Transportation Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 Distributed in Cooperation with Technology Sharing Program Office of the Secretary of Transportation DOT-l-84-33 PREFACE This is the final report prepared by the Community Studies Program at The Pennsylvania State University on behalf of the Office of Technical Assistance of the U.S. Urban Mass Transportation Administra- tion under contract project number UMTA-PA-U6-0U73. Philippos J. Loukissas, Assistant Professor of Urban and Reyional Planniny, was the principal investigator and project manager. Stuart H. Mann, Professor of Operations Research, was responsible for the conduct of research in the ARZ projects survey (Phase III) and for writing Chapter 4. John L. Mace, Jr., a Ph.U. candidate, was responsible for the literature review, the conduct of research in the CBD revitalization survey (Phase II) and for writing Chapters 2 and 3. Larry Bruwelheide, a Ph.O. candidate, participated in the field research (Phase IV) and the writiny of the case studies. Susan Knasko and Kent Simendinyer, botn yraduate students, contributed in the data collection and the review of the literature (Phase 1). Evanyelos Tri antaphy 1 1 ou , also a yraduate student, assisted with the drafting of the illustrations. Joseph Goodman, the UMTA project manager, contributed his extensive experience acquired in the admi ni strati on of the auto restricted zones demonstration program. Vince Milione, while at UMTA, provided critical support for the study. The project benefited from the cooperation of the planniny staff and other individuals who participated in the implementation of CBD revitalization projects in the studied cities. The following people were particularly helpful in providing critical feedback or contributing information about the ARZ projects in the six case studies. Martha Bailey, Boston Redevelopment Authority; Robert Flahive, New York Department of City Planniny; Thomas Gawley, Tippets, Abbett, McCarthy and Stratton; Penrose Gearin, Church Street Marketplace Commission; Carla Fleaton, Transportation Systems Center; Randall Kamerbeek, Burlington Department of Planning and Community Development; Martin Nizlek, Tucson Department of Transportati on ; Ken Orenstein, Providence Foundation; Don Paight, Memphis Center City Commission; Samuel Shamoon, Providence Department of Planniny and Urban Development; and, Glen Weisbrod, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Several Community Studies Program staff contributed to the typiny of this report. They include Randi Hetrick, Wanda Gordon, Lee Ann McClusick and Nancy Johnson. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Some Observations on Pre-1977 ARZs in U.S. Cities . 1 UMTA's ARZ Demonstration Program . 5 Problem Definition 8 Study Objectives 9 Study Methodology 10 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 12 Definition of Implementation 12 Evaluation of Implementation Outcomes 13 Models of the Implementation Process 15 The Community Innovation Adoption Process 19 The Community Decision Making Process 21 Methodological Considerations 23 Concluding Observations 23 3 CBD REVITALIZATION PROJECTS 25 Introduction 25 Sampling Procedures 27 Description of Results 28 Analysis of Results 45 Summary and Discussion 58 4 AUTO RESTRICTED PROJECTS 63 Introduction 63 Sampling Procedures 63 Round I Results 64 Round II Results and Analysis 65 Summary and Discussion 85 5 UMTA'S ARZ DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS - SIX CASE STUDIES ... 89 Boston: The Downtown Crossing 91 Burlington, VT : The Church Street Marketplace .... 106 Memphis: The Madison Avenue Project 123 Providence: The Kennedy Plaza 127 New York City: The Broadway Plaza 143 Tucson: The Auto Restricted Zone Proposal 159 Summary and Discussion 165 6 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION 174 Summary of Findings 174 Methodological Limitations 176 Discussion 178 REFERENCES 183 APPENDIXES 189 A CBD Revitalization Survey - (Questionnaire 1) 190 B List of Contacted and Responding Cities in the 1983 and 1975 Survey by Region 198 C City Responses to Questionnaires 1, 2, and 3 202 D City Membership per Census Group 205 E CBD Revitalization Survey-List of Lessons and Comments . 206 F ARZ Implementation Survey - (Questionnaire 2) 208 G ARZ Implementation Survey-Last Round-(Questionnai re 3) . 214 hi Responses to Questionnaire 3 218 I Cost, Funding Source and Duration of ARZ Projects .... 221 J List of Interviewees 222 TV LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 Comparison of Cities with ARZs With All Cities by Population Size 4 1-2 Comparison of Cities with ARZs With All Cities by Region 6 1-3 U.S. Cities with ARZs by Size and Region 7 3-1 Comparison of Census Groups 30 3-2 CBD Problems - Cofrequency Matrix for City Sample 32 3-3 Joint Frequencies of Census Group, CBD Problem and Location 34 3-4 Project Types: Cofrequency Matrix for Project Sample 36 3-5 Joint Frequencies of Planning and Implementation 3- Responsibilities 41 4-3-6 Implementation Problems: Cofrequency Matrix for Project Sample 43 3-7 Summary of the Relations of Project Types with other Predictor Variables 47 3-8 Summary of the Relations of Implementation Problems with Predictor Variables 50 3-9 Joint Frequencies of Nine Implementation Problems and Three Project Types 52 10 Joint Frequencies of Implementation Problems and Project Types 53 1 Response Rate to Rounds I and II 64 4-2 Fraction of "P" or "VP" Responses Impact of Event on Project Success 67 4-3 Fraction of "P" or "VP" Responses Impact of Event on Project Success 67 4-4 Fraction of "N" or "VN" Responses Impact of Event on Project Success 69 4-5 Frequency and Fraction of "P" or "VP" Responses Impact of Category of Event on Project Success ... 69 v 4-6 Frequency and Fraction of "P" or "VP" Responses Impact of Category of Event on Project Success by Size of City 71 4-7 Frequency and Fraction of "N" or "VN" Responses Impact of Cateyory of Event on Project Success by Size of City 71 4-8 Frequency and Fraction of "P" or "VP" Responses for each Event Category by Project Status and cost 72 4-9 Frequency and Fraction of "P" or "VP" Responses for each Event Category by Project Status and Transit Component ..... 74 4-10 Frequency and Fraction of "N" or "VN" Responses for each Event Category by Project Status and Transit Component 75 4-11 Frequency Distribution of Responses by 27 Cities to the Seven Problem Types 77 4-12 Comparison of Problem Types by Project Status .... 79 4-13 Frequency of Responses as a Fraction of the Total Responses by Project Status for each Project Type 80 4- 4-14 Frequency of M/W Responses as a Fraction of the 5- Total Response by Project Status and Population Size for each Problem Type 81 4-15 Frequency of M/W Responses as a Fraction of Total Response by Project Status and Census Group for each Problem Type 82 4-16 Frequency of M/W Responses as a Fraction of Total Response by Project Status and Cost of the ARZ Project for Each Problem Type 83 4-17 Frequency of M/W Responses as a Fraction of Total Response by Project Status and Transit Component for each Problem Type 84 18 Frequencies of Joint Occurrence of Event Category and Implementation Problem Type 84 1 Boston - Summary of Major Events 102 5-2 Burlington - Summary of Major Events 119 5-3 Memphis - Summary of Major Events 126 vi 5-4 Providence - Summary of Major Events 139 5-5 New York City - Summary of Major Events 156 5-6 Tucson - Summary of Major Events 164 5-7 Summary of ARZ Project Characteristics 166 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 1- Figure 2-1-1 U.S. Cities with ARZs by Year of Completion .... 2 2 U.S. Cities with ARZs (Pre 1977) 5 2- 1 A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Decision 3- Outcomes 14 2-2 A Conceptual Diagram of the Van Meter- Van Horn Model 16 3 Model for Adoption of Innovation by Bingham .... 21 1 Distribution of Projects by Type 38 3-2 Distribution of Projects by Funding Source .... 40 3-3 Frequencies of Implementation Problems 45 3-4 Joint Frequencies of Project Types and Implementation Problems 51 3-5 Joint Frequencies of Project Type and Implementation Problems and Completion Status 56 5-1 Boston Downtown Crossing 92 5-2 Boston: Washington Street 98 5-3 Boston: Winter Street 98 5-4 Burlington CBD 108 5-5 Burlington: Church Str. 1st Block East Side . 117 5-6 Burlington: Church Str. 2nd Block West Side . 117 5-7 Memphis Madison Avenue Transitway 125 5-8 Providence CBD 129 5-9 Providence Kennedy Plaza and Union Station .... 133 5-10 New York City Broadway Plaza Plan 147 5-11 New York City Sketch of Broadway Plaza 149 5-12 Tucson CBD 162 5-13 Summary of Major Events - All Cities 172 Vll 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Study Overview and Methodol ogy In 1975, UMTA's Office of Service and Methods Demonstration (SMD) launcned a demonstration program of Auto Restricted Zones (ARZs) which went beyond the traditional scope of linear pedestrian malls.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Free Tax Services
    IF YOU WORKED IN 2018 & EARNED $55K OR LESS FREE TAX SERVICES JVS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY 75 Federal Street, 3rd Floor, Boston MA 02110 JVS TAX SITE HOURS: TUESDAY & THURSDAY 4:00-8:00 PM JANUARY 29th - APRIL 11th Make your appointment on-line: https://freetaxhelp.us/-/jvs | 617.399.3235 Fast, easy, and free tax preparation IRS certified tax preparers that provide quality returns fast Maximize your refund, get all the credits you deserve EITC, child tax credits, health care tax credits Make the most of your refund Save for emergencies, build credit, and open a bank account https://freetaxhelp.us/-/jvs | 617.399.3235 fb.com/BostonTaxHelp @BosTaxHelp MAKE SURE TO BRING: ALLSTON/BRIGHTON CODMAN SQUARE QUINCY HEALTH CENTER F ABCD: ALLSTON 1199 SEIU Non-expired Photo ID 450 Washington Street required BRIGHTON NOC 108 Myrtle Street 640 Washington Street 617.825.9660 617-284-1199 F Social Security card or 617.903.3640 DOTHOUSE HEALTH Individual Taxpayer ID Letter ROXBURY ALLSTON BRIGHTON CHILD & 1353 Dorchester Avenue (ITIN) for you, your depen- 617.288.3230 ABCD: ROXBURY/ dents and/or your spouse FAMILY SERVICES CENTER NORTH DORCHESTER 406 Cambridge Street DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD F A copy of last year’s tax 855.687.7345 ABCD: ROBERT M. COARD OPPORTUNITY CENTER return [email protected] BUILDING 565 Warren Street 617.442.5900 F All 1099 forms: BRIGHTON BRANCH BOSTON 178 Tremont Street 617.348.6583 1099-G (unemployment), PUBLIC LIBRARY ROXBURY CENTER FOR 1099-R (pension payments), 40 Academy Hill Road JVS CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT 855.687.7345
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Boston's Religious History
    Exploring Boston’s Religious History It is impossible to understand Boston without knowing something about its religious past. The city was founded in 1630 by settlers from England, Other Historical Destinations in popularly known as Puritans, Downtown Boston who wished to build a model Christian community. Their “city on a hill,” as Governor Old South Church Granary Burying Ground John Winthrop so memorably 645 Boylston Street Tremont Street, next to Park Street put it, was to be an example to On the corner of Dartmouth and Church, all the world. Central to this Boylston Streets Park Street T Stop goal was the establishment of Copley T Stop Burial Site of Samuel Adams and others independent local churches, in which all members had a voice New North Church (Now Saint Copp’s Hill Burying Ground and worship was simple and Stephen’s) Hull Street participatory. These Puritan 140 Hanover Street Haymarket and North Station T Stops religious ideals, which were Boston’s North End Burial Site of the Mathers later embodied in the Congregational churches, Site of Old North Church King’s Chapel Burying Ground shaped Boston’s early patterns (Second Church) Tremont Street, next to King’s Chapel of settlement and government, 2 North Square Government Center T Stop as well as its conflicts and Burial Site of John Cotton, John Winthrop controversies. Not many John Winthrop's Home Site and others original buildings remain, of Near 60 State Street course, but this tour of Boston’s “old downtown” will take you to sites important to the story of American Congregationalists, to their religious neighbors, and to one (617) 523-0470 of the nation’s oldest and most www.CongregationalLibrary.org intriguing cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinatown Profile Census 2000
    605 CHINATOWN PROFILE CENSUS 2000 (POPULATION, HOUSING, AND EMPLOYMENT DATA) September 19, 2003 Sue Kim Planning Department and Gregory W. Perkins Research Department Boston Redevelopment Authority Boston Redevelopment Authority Mark Maloney, Director Clarence J. Jones, Chairman Consuelo Gonzales Thornell, Treasurer Joseph W. Nigro, Jr., Co-Vice Chairman Michael Taylor, Co-Vice Chairman Christopher J. Supple, Member Harry R. Collings, Secretary CHINATOWN DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING PROFILE, 2000 Location and Size The boundaries used for Chinatown in this profile are the same as the two Census Tracts 702 and 704 which comprises about 137 acres of land area or only two tenths of a square mile. This area covers approximately from Boylston and Beech Street on the north to East Berkeley Street on the south and from Charles Street South and Tremont Street on the west to Albany Street on the east. Chinatown is adjacent to Downtown Boston, bordered by the Boston Common and Downtown Crossing on the north to the South End on the south, and then from Park Square and Bay Village on the west to the Southeast Expressway on the east. It includes most of the Theater District, some of Emerson College, and most of the Tufts/New England Medical Center. These two Census tracts have a population of 6,015 with 4,169 Asians. If you include about ten blocks north of these two Census tracts in Census tract 701 there are about another 1,000 Asians. But because the study is limited to Census Tract boundaries and because Census tract 701 includes the Midtown, Waterfront and Devonshire areas, with many more non-Asians, it is not included in this study of Chinatown.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Government Services Center: Lindemann-Hurley Preservation Report
    BOSTON GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER: LINDEMANN-HURLEY PRESERVATION REPORT JANUARY 2020 Produced for the Massachusetts Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance (DCAMM) by Bruner/Cott & Associates Henry Moss, AIA, LEED AP Lawrence Cheng, AIA, LEED AP with OverUnder: 2016 text review and Stantec January 2020 Unattributed photographs in this report are by Bruner/Cott & Associates or are in the public domain. Table of Contents 01 Introduction & Context 02 Site Description 03 History & Significance 04 Preservation Narrative 05 Recommendations 06 Development Alternatives Appendices A Massachusetts Cultural Resource Record BOS.1618 (2016) B BSGC DOCOMOMO Long Fiche Architectural Forum, Photos of New England INTRODUCTION & CONTEXT 5 BGSC LINDEMANN-HURLEY PRESERVATION REPORT | DCAMM | BRUNER/COTT & ASSOCIATES WITH STANTEC WITH ASSOCIATES & BRUNER/COTT | DCAMM | REPORT PRESERVATION LINDEMANN-HURLEY BGSC Introduction This report examines the Boston Government Services Center (BGSC), which was built between 1964 and 1970. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the site’s architecture, its existing uses, and the buildings’ relationships to surrounding streets. It is to help the Commonwealth’s Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance (DCAMM) assess the significance of the historic architecture of the site as a whole and as it may vary among different buildings and their specific components. The BGSC is a major work by Paul Rudolph, one of the nation’s foremost post- World War II architects, with John Paul Carlhian of Shepley Bulfinch Richardson and Abbot. The site’s development followed its clearance as part of the city’s Urban Renewal initiative associated with creation of Government Center. A series of prior planning studies by I.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Trail N W E S
    Welcome to Boston’s Freedom Trail N W E S Each number on the map is associated with a stop along the Freedom Trail. Read the summary with each number for a brief history of the landmark. 15 Bunker Hill Charlestown Cambridge 16 Musuem of Science Leonard P Zakim Bunker Hill Bridge Boston Harbor Charlestown Bridge Hatch Shell 14 TD Banknorth Garden/North Station 13 North End 12 Government Center Beacon Hill City Hall Cheers 2 4 5 11 3 6 Frog Pond 7 10 Rowes Wharf 9 1 Fanueil Hall 8 New England Downtown Crossing Aquarium 1. BOSTON COMMON - bound by Tremont, Beacon, Charles and Boylston Streets Initially used for grazing cattle, today the Common is a public park used for recreation, relaxing and public events. 2. STATE HOUSE - Corner of Beacon and Park Streets Adjacent to Boston Common, the Massachusetts State House is the seat of state government. Built between 1795 and 1798, the dome was originally constructed of wood shingles, and later replaced with a copper coating. Today, the dome gleams in the sun, thanks to a covering of 23-karat gold leaf. 3. PARK STREET CHURCH - One Park Street, Boston MA 02108 church has been active in many social issues of the day, including anti-slavery and, more recently, gay marriage. 4. GRANARY BURIAL GROUND - Park Street, next to Park Street Church Paul Revere, John Hancock, Samuel Adams, and the victims of the Boston Massacre. 5. KINGS CHAPEL - 58 Tremont St., Boston MA, corner of Tremont and School Streets ground is the oldest in Boston, and includes the tomb of John Winthrop, the first governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
    [Show full text]
  • Roxbury-Dorchester-Mattapan Transit Needs Study
    Roxbury-Dorchester-Mattapan Transit Needs Study SEPTEMBER 2012 The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration [and Federal Transit Administration], U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors [or agency] expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U. S. Department of Transportation. i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 I. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 A Lack of Trust .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 The Loss of Rapid Transit Service .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of the Boston Municipal Research Bureau
    333 Washington Street, Suite 854, Boston, MA 02108 T(617-227-1900 F(617)227-2815 www.bmrb.org Testimony of the Boston Municipal Research Bureau Before the Boston City Council's Committee on Economic Development and Planning August 2, 2010 Regarding: Docket #0997, In Support of a Downtown Boston Business Improvement District Mr. Chairman, my name is Sam Tyler, President of the Boston Municipal Research Bureau and I am here today to testify in support of Docket #0997 to authorize creation of the Downtown Boston Business Improvement District. The Research Bureau's office on Washington Street is situated in the middle of Downtown Boston and we firmly agree that the mix of commercial, retail, hospitality, nonprofit institutional and residential property in the area and the foot traffic of over 200,000 people daily demand a higher level of services than the City now provides. We believe that the supplemental services that a BID will offer beyond the City's baseline services will help revitalize Downtown Boston and support long- term enhanced maintenance of the area. The Downtown Boston BID will encompass an area from the top bound by Tremont Street between Government Center and Boylston and Essex Streets and at the bottom by Congress and High Streets. The Research Bureau has been involved with evaluating plans to create a Downtown Boston BID since the first effort in 1998 and later in 2002. We originally raised concerns that the City of Boston does not provide services commensurate with the service needs of this district or the taxes generated in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Revitalization Effort Roslindale, MA Originally Part of Roxbury and Then West Roxbury Was Established in 1870
    History of the Revitalization Effort Roslindale, MA originally part of Roxbury and then West Roxbury was established in 1870. During the 1950’s and 1960’s it had a thriving commercial district (2 supermarkets, a movie theater, department store, etc.). During the mid 1970’s the commercial district saw a major decline due to the desegregation of the schools and subsequent flight of people to the suburbs and the growth of shopping malls. This decline continued for over 15 years. The commercial district during that time was empty storefronts and burned out buildings. Seventy-five percent of the commercial spaces were vacant. The businesses that managed to stay in the district were completely grated. There was virtually no foot traffic. At the direction of City Councilor Thomas Menino (now Mayor of Boston), struggling merchants in the commercial district organized and applied to the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s Urban Demonstration Program. Roslindale Village Main Street (RVMS) was organized in 1985. Once organized, RVMS began the process of revitalizing the commercial district by fully working the Four Points of Main Streets. When community activists learned that the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) was planning a new commuter rail line that would go from downtown Boston to the suburbs, passing through Roslindale without stopping, they lobbied hard and successfully for a Roslindale stop. This stop provides a 12-minute ride to downtown Boston and has fueled to rebirth of the area. In 1990 residents of Roslindale, spurred on by the efforts of RVMS, mobilized to form an organization for the purpose of opening a cooperative market.
    [Show full text]
  • 4236 Washington Street Roslindale, MA
    Boston Redevelopment Authority – Article 80 Small Project Review Submission for Proposed Residential Building 4236 Washington Street Roslindale, MA Owner/Developer: Peregrine Group LLC Beverly Gallo, Principal, Peregrine Urban Initiative 20 Newman Avenue Suite 1005 Rumford, RI 02916 617-901-1986 Email: [email protected] Architect: Prellwitz Chilinski Associates David Chilinski 221 Hampshire Street Cambridge, MA 02159 617-547-8120 Email: [email protected] January 7, 2013 4236 Washington Street – Roslindale, Massachusetts Table of Contents Project Owner and Development Team Project Description Project Site Neighborhood Context Public Benefits Traffic, Parking and Vehicular/Pedestrian Access Zoning Analysis Anticipated Permits and Further Public Review Architectural Narrative Appendix A: Site Plan, Architectural Plans, Elevations and Renderings 2 Ownership and Development Team The proposed development at 4236 Washington Street in Roslindale is the result of a joint development partnership between Roslindale Village Main Street, Historic Boston Inc., and Peregrine Group LLC. As project sponsors, Roslindale Village Main Street (RVMS) has worked successfully to secure the rights to purchase the site known as the Higgins Funeral Home parcel. RVMS has agreed to assign the rights and responsibilities under the Purchase and Sale agreement (P&S) to the developer, Peregrine Group LLC to undertake the development proposed herein. The Project development team includes: Owner/Developer: Peregrine Group LLC Beverly Gallo, Principal, Peregrine
    [Show full text]
  • Families with Young Children Local Community Resource Guide Downtown Boston
    Families with Young Children Local Community Resource Guide Downtown Boston Early parenting and family opportunities (Expectant parents and families with children ages 0–5) Big Tent Group- Jewish Families with Young Children Boston Parenting Through a Jewish Lens Garden Moms Hill House JF&CS Support Groups for New Parents Early childhood learning centers Boston Frances Jacobson Early Childhood Center at Temple Israel Brighton JCC Early Learning Center Yal-Day-New Day Care Center Brookline Diane K. Trust Center for Early Education Kehillath Israel Nursery School Resources for families with school-aged children Camps Day schools Boston JCC Discovery Club For supplemental religious school and youth group information, please see the synagogues listed below. Synagogues/spiritual communities Search by town Boston Boston Area Minyan Central Reform Temple of Boston Chabad Boston Chabad Downtown Boston Chabad House of Greater Boston Congregation Am Tikva Havurah on the Hill at the Vilna Shul Temple Israel of Boston The Boston Synagogue Zvhil-Mezbuz Beis Medrash Brighton Chabad Shul of Brighton Congregation Chai Odom Congregation Kadimah-Toras Moshe Jewish Russian Center and Synagogue Sephardic Community of Greater Boston Temple Bnai Moshe Brookline Beth Abraham Synagogue Congregation Beth Pinchas Congregation Kehillath Israel Congregation Mishkan Tefila Minyan Shaleym Temple Beth Zion Temple Ohabei Shalom Temple Sinai Brookline Young Israel of Brookline Jamaica Plain Nehar Shalom Community Synagogue West Roxbury Temple Hillel B’nai Torah Downtown
    [Show full text]
  • East Boston (Approx. 45-65 Minutes) West Roxbury (Approx
    BOSTON NEIGHBORHOODS AND SURROUNDING AREAS East Boston (approx. 45-65 minutes) West Roxbury (approx. 40-50 minutes) • Widely known as a strong, family-oriented • This neighborhood is the city's southwest- neighborhood, it shares a peninsula with ernmost community. It is filled with beauti- Logan Airport. The population has de- ful Victorian homes and its residents take creased over time with the expansion of pride in a variety of civic activities. transportation facilities, but there is still a Cambridge (approx. 35-50 minutes) strong civic pride in this urban community. • This community is home to Harvard Uni- Hyde Park (approx. 40-55 minutes) versity and the Massachusetts Institute of • This residential community of 33,000 lies Technology. The busy Harvard Square area eight miles from downtown Boston. The is the center of activity in Cambridge and neighborhood enjoys a quiet, suburban set- is home to retail shops, historic build- ting, is home to a national wildlife pre- ings, offices and restaurants. serve, and provides its residents with the best of urban and suburban living. Malden (approx. 50-80 minutes) • This ethnically diverse community is lo- cated northeast of Boston. Formerly a tex- tile manufacturing center, it is now primar- ily a residential community. Mattapan (approx. 60-80 minutes) • This neighborhood has historically been home to surges of immigrants. Currently, a strong economic revitalization is occurring in both the residential and business areas of this family-oriented community. Roslindale (approx. 35-45 minutes) • This residential neighborhood provides its residents with suburban comforts as well as urban access. Strong civic and crime watch organizations make it a source of pride for those families who call it home.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Name Address Property Manager Br W/Chair Elevator Services Mod_____Program Type
    BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY SECTION 8 MODERATE REHABILITATION FEDERAL HOUSING PROGRAMS SITE NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY MANAGER BR W/CHAIR ELEVATOR SERVICES _MOD_____PROGRAM TYPE Arch Project 1049-1051 Tremont Street Simsbury Associates, Inc. SRO YES NO NO MOD FAMILY Boston, MA 02120 14 Storrs Avenue Braintree, MA 02184 (781) 849-7722 The Arch Project is located on Tremont Street in Boston, where the South End and Lower Roxbury meet. It is ideally located on the Tremont Street bus line and within blocks from the Ruggles MBTA Station, offering access to the Orange Line. The property is close to the Boston Medical Center as well as the Longwood Medical area. This location is close to the Museum of Fine Arts, Fenway Park, South Bay Shopping Plaza and the Downtown Theatre District. Each floor has its own shared kitchen and bathroom facility. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Betances House 326 Shawmut Ave Bay Cove Human Services, Inc. SRO NO NO YES MOD ELDERLY/DISABLED Boston, MA 02118 66 Canal St Boston, MA. 02114 (617) 371-3000 Residencia Betances occupies a five-story brownstone row house in Boston’s South End. The building is within walking distance of the Boston Medical Center and is accessible by public transportation. The first two floors are four semi-independent studio apartments and on the upper three floors are seven single bedrooms along with a shared living room, kitchen and two and one- half baths. The program currently serves as home to formerly homeless men and women. A residential program staff member provides 24-hour coverage and is bilingual. Staff members assist the residents with the development of daily living skills and provide access to mental health services.
    [Show full text]