DOCSLIB.ORG

Epsom & Walton Downs & Epsom Golf Club Habitat Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Epsom & Walton Downs & Epsom Golf Club Habitat Management Plan Epsom & Walton Downs & Epsom Golf Club Habitat Management Plan 2015-2020 1 Part One – Epsom and Walton Downs ......................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 2015-2020 Management Plan .................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Background to previous plan...................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Report Layout ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.5 Desk Top Research ..................................................................................................................... 7 2 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Management Review.................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Chalk Grassland Rarity ................................................................................................................ 8 2.3 Rare Plants .................................................................................................................................. 9 2.4 Unusual Birds .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.5 Declining Butterflies ................................................................................................................. 11 2.6 Rare Invertebrates .................................................................................................................... 11 2.7 Reasons for Decline .................................................................................................................. 11 2.8 Enormous Potential .................................................................................................................. 11 2.9 Grassland condition assessment .............................................................................................. 11 3 Site Description ............................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Location .................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Altitude ..................................................................................................................................... 15 3.3 Land Tenure .............................................................................................................................. 15 3.4 Rights of Way/Access ............................................................................................................... 15 3.5 Geology ..................................................................................................................................... 15 4 Botanical Survey ............................................................................................................................. 16 4.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 16 4.1.1 collection of field data ...................................................................................................... 16 2 4.1.2 National Vegetation Classification (NVC) 2008 ................................................................. 16 4.2 Results 2014 ............................................................................................................................. 16 4.2.1 National Vegetation Classification (NVC) .......................................................................... 21 5 Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey ...................................................................................................... 24 5.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 24 5.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 27 5.3 Taxonomic coverage ................................................................................................................. 27 5.4 Constraints................................................................................................................................ 27 5.5 Status categories for uncommon species ................................................................................ 28 5.6 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 29 5.6.1 Summary Table ................................................................................................................. 29 5.7 Entomological assessment 2007 .............................................................................................. 33 5.8 Species list ................................................................................................................................ 34 6 Site Evaluation ................................................................................................................................ 35 6.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 35 6.2 Size ............................................................................................................................................ 35 6.3 Diversity .................................................................................................................................... 35 6.4 Naturalness ............................................................................................................................... 35 6.5 Rarity ........................................................................................................................................ 36 6.6 Fragility ..................................................................................................................................... 37 6.7 Typicalness ............................................................................................................................... 37 6.8 Recorded History ...................................................................................................................... 37 6.9 Ecological History ..................................................................................................................... 38 6.10 Position in an Ecological Unit................................................................................................ 38 6.11 Potential Value...................................................................................................................... 40 6.12 Intrinsic Appeal ..................................................................................................................... 41 7 Factors Affecting Management ...................................................................................................... 41 3 8 Management Recommendations ................................................................................................... 43 8.1 Grassland Management ........................................................................................................... 43 8.1.1 Soil Scrapes ....................................................................................................................... 43 8.1.2 Mowing ............................................................................................................................. 43 8.1.3 Invasive Grasses ................................................................................................................ 43 8.1.4 Grazing .............................................................................................................................. 43 8.1.5 Scrub Clearance ................................................................................................................. 43 8.1.6 Juniper Management ........................................................................................................ 43 8.2 Woodland Management .......................................................................................................... 43 8.2.1 Langley Vale Copse & southern section of The Warren Woodland ................................. 43 8.2.2 Rest of Warren Woodland ................................................................................................ 43 8.3 Hedgerow Management .......................................................................................................... 43 8.4 Open Water .............................................................................................................................. 44 8.5 Monitoring ................................................................................................................................ 44 9 Appendix 1 – Vascular Plant Species List .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green-Tree Retention and Controlled Burning in Restoration and Conservation of Beetle Diversity in Boreal Forests
    Dissertationes Forestales 21 Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Esko Hyvärinen Faculty of Forestry University of Joensuu Academic dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu, for public criticism in auditorium C2 of the University of Joensuu, Yliopistonkatu 4, Joensuu, on 9th June 2006, at 12 o’clock noon. 2 Title: Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Author: Esko Hyvärinen Dissertationes Forestales 21 Supervisors: Prof. Jari Kouki, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Docent Petri Martikainen, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Pre-examiners: Docent Jyrki Muona, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Docent Tomas Roslin, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Division of Population Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Opponent: Prof. Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Department of Natural Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden ISSN 1795-7389 ISBN-13: 978-951-651-130-9 (PDF) ISBN-10: 951-651-130-9 (PDF) Paper copy printed: Joensuun yliopistopaino, 2006 Publishers: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Finnish Forest Research Institute Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu Editorial Office: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Unioninkatu 40A, 00170 Helsinki, Finland http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes 3 Hyvärinen, Esko 2006. Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. ABSTRACT The main aim of this thesis was to demonstrate the effects of green-tree retention and controlled burning on beetles (Coleoptera) in order to provide information applicable to the restoration and conservation of beetle species diversity in boreal forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Suborder Symphyta – Sawflies and Wood Wasps
    20 Yu.N. Sundukov SUBORDER SYMPHYTA – SAWFLIES Subfamily MACROXYELINAE AND WOOD WASPS MEGAXYELA Ashmead, 1898 (Odontophyes Konow, YU.N. SUNDUKOV 1899; Megaloxyela Schulz, 1906; Paraxyela Mac- Gillivray, 1912). The larvae feed on the Juglanda- Sawflies are distinguished from otherHymenoptera ceae. Type species Xyela major Cresson, 1880. by the anterior margin of the tergum 1, which appears The genus is distributed in East Palaearctic and as part of abdomen rather than thorax, though it is Nearctic region. Number of species: World – 11; fused to the postnotum of the metathorax. The sub- Palaearctic – 6; Russia – 2. order is distributed worldwide. Number of recent taxa: World – 15 familes, 45 subfamilies, about 650 genera, Megaxyela gigantea Mocsàry, 1909 (M. mikado Sato, about 8250 species; Palaearctic – 13/24/>310/about 1930). Host plant: Juglans mandshurica Maxim., 4400; Russia – 13/22/170/1546. J. ailanthifolia Carr., J. regia L. (Juglandaceae). The classification used here reflects classification, Russia: FE (KH, PR). – Korean Peninsula. derived from the “World catalog of Symphyta” (Taeger Megaxyela pulchra Blank, Shinohara et Sundukov, et al., 2010), taking into account the latest taxonomic 2017. Host plant: Juglans mandshurica Maxim., changes (see the list of references). ?J. ailanthifolia Carr., ?J. regia L., ?Pterocarya spp. (Juglandaceae). Russia: FE (PR). – China (NE, WP, INFRAORDER XYELOMORPHA SE), Korean Peninsula. SUPERFAMILY XYELOIDEA Subfamily XYELINAE One family: Xyelidae. PLERONEURA Konow, 1897 (Manoxyela Ashmead, 1898). T y p e s p e c i e s Xyela dahli Hartig, 1837. 1. FAMILY XYELIDAE The larvae of species bores in the shoot of Abies and Picea (Pinaceae). The genus is distributed in Xyelidae is the earliest known family of Hyme- the Holarctic and Neotropical regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
    [Show full text]
  • Banstead Woods Nature Trail Is Approximately 3 Miles (5Km) in Length and Takes 1.5-2.5 Hours
    Come and discover the magnificent countryside EAD WO on your doorstep ST O N D Banstead Woods Nature Trail is approximately 3 miles (5km) in length and takes 1.5-2.5 hours. The trail starts from Holly A S Lane car park, near Chipstead (OS grid reference: TQ273 583) B This area is covered by Explorer 146 (1:25,000) and Landranger 187 (1:50,000). N A L The start of the trail can be reached by public transport. T I Chipstead railway station is around 500m from Holly Lane car U A park. For information about bus services and times R R please contact: Traveline on 0871 200 2233 E T or visit www.traveline.info n to t 22 u 20 S A ey o rl t Pu to 9 7 2 B 217 B2 d a o BANSTEAD R n P WOODMANSTERNE o a t r h k R g H i o r o on l a oulsd B ly d to C La ne B2 219 A 2 4 0 2 P CHIPSTEAD STATION BANSTEAD WOODS CHIPSTEAD 7 1 2 A e n KINGSWOOD a L Bus stop STATION od utwo r. O Train station r D 2 nso 03 Bo B2 P Holly Lane Car Park W a Surrounding countryside te e KINSGSWOOD rh an ouse L Banstead Woods to M25 and Reigate Built up area Most of the paths are in good condition, however some paths can be muddy in the winter or after rainfall so walking boots or wellies are recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • SNCI Review Summary Sheet Site Name: Dene Fields Recorder
    SNCI Review Summary Sheet Site name: Dene Fields Recorder number: 15076 Grid Ref: TQ269573 Borough: Reigate and Banstead Ward: Chipstead, Hooley & Woodmansterne Date of previous surveys: 21/6/1995 11/8/2008 Date of last survey: 1/8/2013 & 7/8/2013 Date selected as SNCI: 2009 Previous reviews: N/A Date of last review: 28/1/2014 (by Local Sites Partnership) Previous status of site: SNCI Current status of site: SNCI Reason for Selection The site is selected for its calcareous grassland habitat which supports a high diversity of species. 29 species typical of grassland of conservation interest in Surrey have been recorded on the site. Dwarf Spurge, Euphorbia exigua (Nationally Scarce) has been recorded on the site. The site’s position is important adjacent to Fames Rough, part of Chipstead Downs Site of Special Scientific Interest. Changes at latest review No change R & B SNCI Surveys 2013: Review of existing site Site Name: Dene Fields Recorder Number: 15076 Grid Ref: TQ 269 573 Parish: N/A Ward: Chipstead, Hooley & Woodmansterne Area of SNCI: 30.6 ha Previous SNCI surveys: 11/08/2008 ,Sue Cooper Surveyor (s): 21/6/1995 M. Williams & A. Tutt Date of current survey: 1/8/2013 & 7/8/2013, Surveyor(s): Sue Cooper Site description The site is located on the west side of Chipstead Valley adjacent to Chipstead Downs SSSI. It comprises chalk grassland, hedgerows and plantation. It is situated on a brown rendzina soil overlying the Upper Chalk crossing on to clay at the top of the site at approximately the 150m contour.
    [Show full text]
  • Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) of the Bohemian Forest and Its Foothills
    Silva Gabreta vol. 20 (3) p. 131–147 Vimperk, 2014 Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) of the Bohemian Forest and its foothills Karel Beneš Kreuzmannova 14, CZ-31800 Plzeň, Czech Republic [email protected] Abstract The sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) collected in the Bohemian Forest and its foothills during the sum- mer months of 1981–1985 are listed. To gain a more comprehensive overview of symphytan fauna of the region, data published by former authors have been critically analysed and evaluated to give the most possi- bly comprehensive list of species. Altogether, 173 species (Xyelidae: 1, Pamphiliidae: 17, Argidae: 6, Cim- bicidae: 6, Diprionidae: 5, Tenthredinidae: 126, Xiphydriidae: 1, Siricidae: 4, Cephidae: 5, and Orussidae: 1) are registered. Of these, three are registered as endangered and fifteen as vulnerable. Key words: Symphyta, Šumava Mts., Böhmerwald, faunistics, host plants INTRODUCTION In recent years several attempts to evaluate the symphytan fauna of some interesting central European montane regions have been published, e.g., from the Low Tatras National Park (ROLLER et al. 2006), Jizeské Hory Mts. (MACEK 2006), Bílé Karpaty Protected Landscape Area (MACEK 2012), and the Giant Mts. (BENEš 2013). However, the sawfly fauna of the Bo- hemian Forest (Šumava in Czech, Böhmerwald in German) has received in last 120 years only little attention and remained practically unknown. While the fauna of several groups of invertebrates (Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Aranea, aquatic Crustacea, Ephemeroptera, Odona- ta, Plecoptera, Megaloptera, and Trichoptera) of the mountains and foothills comprising the Bohemian Forest is fairly well known, our knowledge of Symphyta is negligible, and only a few older publications mention this territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Wicken Fen Wildlife the Recording and Research Newsletter New Edition 7 April 2015
    Wicken Fen Wildlife The Recording and Research Newsletter New Edition 7 April 2015 Wicken Fen National Nature Reserve, Lode Lane, Wicken, Cambs. CB7 5XP Visitor Centre telephone 01353 720274, Email [email protected] www.nationaltrust.org.uk/wicken-fen/ Wicken Fen nature reserve is owned by the National Trust. It currently totals 764 hectares (1887 acres), of which the designated National Nature Reserve is 255 ha and this includes the 163 ha of the core fen habitat on deeper peats that have not been drained for agriculture. The land area of the reserve has increased by more than 2.5-fold since the early 1990s, with the purchase by the Trust of several areas of land which is in the process of restoration to create a much larger nature reserve for wildlife and people. The very rare Fen Violet was re-discovered in May 2014, at the very location on Verrall’s Fen at Wicken where it was last seen in 1999 (photo Pete Stroh). 1 Introduction Welcome to the latest annual edition of the Wicken Fen Wildlife Newsletter. The aim of this Newsletter is keep you informed of what is going on and what wildlife is being recorded here at Wicken Fen nature reserve. We hope you find the contents interesting and that you might be encouraged to get involved, come and visit and tell us what you find. Wicken Fen is managed by a professional team guided by advisors and a highly experienced and knowledgeable Local Committee. In 2014, we welcomed a new Strategic Manager to lead the Wicken team, Joan Childs, who comes to the National Trust with a wealth of experience from working at the RSPB.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mitochondrial Genomes of 39 Soil Dwelling
    New mitochondrial genomes of 39 soil dwelling Coleoptera from metagenome sequencing Carmelo Andujar, Paula Arribas, Michal Motyka, Mathew Bocek, Ladislav Bocak, Benjamin Linard, Alfried Vogler To cite this version: Carmelo Andujar, Paula Arribas, Michal Motyka, Mathew Bocek, Ladislav Bocak, et al.. New mitochondrial genomes of 39 soil dwelling Coleoptera from metagenome sequencing. Mi- tochondrial DNA Part B Resources, Taylor & Francis Online, 2019, 4 (2), pp.2447-2450. 10.1080/23802359.2019.1637289. hal-02922399 HAL Id: hal-02922399 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02922399 Submitted on 26 Aug 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PART B 2019, VOL. 4, NO. 2, 2447–2450 https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2019.1637289 MITO COMMUNICATION New mitochondrial genomes of 39 soil dwelling Coleoptera from metagenome sequencing Carmelo Andujar a,b,c, Paula Arribasa,b,c, Michal Motykad, Mathew Bocekd, Ladislav Bocakd, Benjamin Linardb,e and Alfried P. Voglerb,c aGrupo de Ecologıa y Evolucion en Islas, Instituto de Productos
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Abundance of Pest Insects Associated with Solanum Tuberosum L
    American Journal of Entomology 2021; 5(3): 51-69 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/aje doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20210503.13 ISSN: 2640-0529 (Print); ISSN: 2640-0537 (Online) Diversity and Abundance of Pest Insects Associated with Solanum tuberosum L. 1753 (Solanaceae) in Balessing (West-Cameroon) Babell Ngamaleu-Siewe, Boris Fouelifack-Nintidem, Jeanne Agrippine Yetchom-Fondjo, Basile Moumite Mohamed, Junior Tsekane Sedick, Edith Laure Kenne, Biawa-Miric Kagmegni, * Patrick Steve Tuekam Kowa, Romaine Magloire Fantio, Abdel Kayoum Yomon, Martin Kenne Department of the Biology and Physiology of Animal Organisms, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon Email address: *Corresponding author To cite this article: Babell Ngamaleu-Siewe, Boris Fouelifack-Nintidem, Jeanne Agrippine Yetchom-Fondjo, Basile Moumite Mohamed, Junior Tsekane Sedick, Edith Laure Kenne, Biawa-Miric Kagmegni, Patrick Steve Tuekam Kowa, Romaine Magloire Fantio, Abdel Kayoum Yomon, Martin Kenne. Diversity and Abundance of Pest Insects Associated with Solanum tuberosum L. 1753 (Solanaceae) in Balessing (West-Cameroon). American Journal of Entomology . Vol. 5, No. 3, 2021, pp. 51-69. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20210503.13 Received : July 14, 2021; Accepted : August 3, 2021; Published : August 11, 2021 Abstract: Solanum tuberosum L. 1753 (Solanaceae) is widely cultivated for its therapeutic and nutritional qualities. In Cameroon, the production is insufficient to meet the demand in the cities and there is no published data on the diversity of associated pest insects. Ecological surveys were conducted from July to September 2020 in 16 plots of five development stages in Balessing (West- Cameroon). Insects active on the plants were captured and identified and the community structure was characterized.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Symphyta: Argidae) from South Korea with Key to Species of the Subfamily Arginae
    Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 9 (2016) 183e193 HOSTED BY Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/japb Original article Three new species of the genus Arge (Hymenoptera: Symphyta: Argidae) from South Korea with key to species of the subfamily Arginae Jin-Kyung Choi a, Su-Bin Lee a, Meicai Wei b, Jong-Wook Lee a,* a Department of Life Sciences, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, South Korea b Key Laboratory of Cultivation and Protection for Non-Wood Forest Trees (Central South University of Forestry and Technology), Ministry of Education, Changsha, China article info abstract Article history: Three new species, Arge koreana Wei & Lee sp. nov. from South Korea, Arge pseudorejecta Wei & Lee sp. Received 20 January 2016 nov., and Arge shengi Wei & Lee sp. nov. from South Korea and China are described. Keys to known genera Received in revised form of Argidae and known species of Arginae from South Korea are provided. 11 February 2016 Copyright Ó 2016, National Science Museum of Korea (NSMK) and Korea National Arboretum (KNA). Accepted 15 February 2016 Production and hosting by Elsevier. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// Available online 24 February 2016 creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Keywords: Arginae China key Korea Introduction Takeuchi 1927, 1939; Doi 1938; Kim 1957, 1963, 1970; Togashi 1973, 1990, 1997; Zombori 1974, 1978; Paek et al 2010; Shinohara Taeger et al (2010) listed 58 genera and 913 valid species and et al 2009; Shinohara et al 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Trapping of Kleidocerys Trunculatus (Or K
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Greenwich Academic Literature Archive Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (GALA) – the University of Greenwich open access repository http://gala.gre.ac.uk __________________________________________________________________________________________ Citation for published version: Reynolds, Don R., Nau, Bernard S. and Chapman, Jason W. (2013) High-altitude migration of Heteroptera in Britain. European Journal of Entomology, 110 (3). pp. 483-492. ISSN 1210-5759 (Print), 1802-8829 (Online) (doi:10.14411/eje.2013.064) Publisher’s version available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.14411/eje.2013.064 __________________________________________________________________________________________ Please note that where the full text version provided on GALA is not the final published version, the version made available will be the most up-to-date full-text (post-print) version as provided by the author(s). Where possible, or if citing, it is recommended that the publisher’s (definitive) version be consulted to ensure any subsequent changes to the text are noted. Citation for this version held on GALA: Reynolds, Don R., Nau, Bernard S. and Chapman, Jason W. (2013) High-altitude migration of Heteroptera in Britain. London: Greenwich Academic Literature Archive. Available at: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/12196/ __________________________________________________________________________________________ Contact: [email protected] This is the Author's Accepted Manuscript version, uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Please note: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY and published 11 July 2013 by the Institute of Entomology (Czech Republic). Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as editing, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Shropshire Invertebrates Group
    Shropshire Invertebrates Group Annual Report 2006 Report compiled by A. G. Blunt University of Wolverhampton April 2007 Shropshire Invertebrates Group Annual Report 2006 1 Table of Contents Page Field Meetings 2006 1 Dudmaston, 26 February 1 Nills Hill Quarry and Poles Coppice, Pontesbury, 19 March 2 Treflach and Dolgoch Quarries, 30 April 3 Llynclys Quarry, 11 June 4 Clee Hill Quarry and Titterstone Clee, 9 July 6 Rhos Fiddle and Riddings Brook, 13 August 7 Clee Hill Quarry and Treenpits, 3 September 8 Lower Short Ditch, 8 October 9 Members’ individual activities 2006 John Mason 11 Ian Thompson 12 Nigel Jones 14 Godfrey Blunt 17 Reference 17 Appendix: Scientific names of organisms mentioned in the text 19 Photographs: Silver-washed Fritillary, Stenocorus meridianus, Eyed Ladybird, Ancistrocerus parietum, Limnephilus flavicornis 10 Rhingia rostrata, Phasia obesa, Bee-wolf Philanthus triangulum, Rhyssa persuasoria 18 Text © A. G. Blunt, I. Thompson, J. Mason, N. Jones Photographs © N. Jones, I. Thompson Field Meetings 2006 26 February 2006: Dudmaston (present: C. Derry, K. Claxton, N. Jones, G. Blunt) As our Group met at Hampton Loade on this late February day the Severn Valley bore no traces of a recent light snowfall, though across the river snow could still be seen powdering the summit of Brown Clee. In fact we experienced sunshine intermittently throughout our visit, creating warm and welcome intervals between cloudy 2 spells and cold breezes. Our main aims were to search for the terrestrial caddis Enoicyla pusilla and to sample rot-holes in old trees for larvae of Diptera. After following the river bank and passing beneath the waterworks’ bridge we entered Long Covert, a tongue of mature deciduous woodland which we found to contain much Pedunculate Oak and Hazel, the latter liberally festooned with catkins.
    [Show full text]