DOCSLIB.ORG

Recommendations on a Harmonized Europe Wide Technical Requirements for Inland Navigation Vessels

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recommendations on a Harmonized Europe Wide Technical Requirements for Inland Navigation Vessels Document informel No 1 Informal document No.1 Point 7a) de l’ordre du jour Agenda item 7(a) Transmis par le Groupe des volontaires Prepared by the Group of volunteers PROJET DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS ON A HARMONIZED EUROPE WIDE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR INLAND NAVIGATION VESSELS (amended annex to resolution no.17, revised) 2005 TRANS/SC.3/… page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1 General provisions Chapter 2 Procedure and rules for the inspection of inland navigation vessels Chapter 3 Shipbuilding requirements Chapter 3a Fire protection Chapter 4 Safety clearance, freeboard and draught marks Chapter 5 Manoeuvrability Chapter 6 Steering gear Chapter 7 Wheelhouse Chapter 8 Engine design Chapter 8a Exhaust and pollutant particulate emissions from diesel engines Chapter 8b Prevention of water pollution and abatement of noise produced by vessels Chapter 9 Electrical installations Chapter 10 Equipment Chapter 11 Working spaces Chapter 12 Crew accommodation Chapter 13 Fuel-fired heating, cooking and refrigerating equipment (Left void) Chapter 14 Liquefied gas installations for domestic purposes Chapter 15 Special provisions for passenger vessels Chapter 15A Specific requirements for sailing passenger vessels (Left void) Chapter 16 Pushers, pushed barges and pushed and towed convoys Chapter 17 Specific requirements for sailing passenger vessels (Left void) Chapter 18 Specific requirements applicable to worksite craft (Left void) TRANS/SC.3/… page 3 Page Chapter 19 Specific requirements applicable to historic vessels (Left void) Chapter 19A Specific requirements applicable to canal barges (Left void) Chapter 19B Specific requirements applicable to craft navigating on zone 4 (Left void) Chapter 20 Specific requirements applicable to sea-going vessels (Left void) Chapter 21 Specific requirements applicable to recreational craft (Left void) Chapter 22 Stability of vessels carrying containers Chapter 22A Specific requirements applicable to craft longer than 110 m (Left void) Chapter 22B Specific requirements applicable to high-speed vessels Chapter 23 Crews Chapter 24 Transitional and final provisions (Left void) Appendix 1 List of European inland waterways divided geographically into zones 1, 2 and 3 Appendix 2 Model ship’s certificate Appendix 3 Safety signs and signals to be used on board inland navigation vessels Appendix 4 Alternative manoeuvrability test procedures and criteria in accordance with 5-2.1 Appendix 5 Model of a service record TRANS/SC.3/… page 4 CHAPTER 1 1/ GENERAL PROVISIONS 1-1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1-1.1 The purpose of this text is to provide recommendations on the design and equipment of inland navigation vessels with a view, in particular, to promoting the safety of vessels and crews; this text is not a substitute for national laws and regulations. 1-1.2 In general, these Recommendations shall, with due regard to definitions in 1-2, apply to: (i) vessels having a length L of 20 meters or more; (ii) vessels for which the product of L x B x T is a volume of 100 m3 or more.2/ 1-1.3 These Recommendations shall also apply, with due regard to definitions in 1-2, to all: (i) tugs and pushers, designated to tow or to push or to move alongside vessels as referred to in 1-1.2; (ii) vessels intended for passenger transport which carry more than 12 people in addition to the crew.3/ 1-1.4 In general, these Recommendations shall not apply to: (i) ferries, (ii) naval craft.4/ 1-1.5 For the purpose of these Recommendations, European inland waterways shall be classified as follows: Zone 1 (wave height of up to 2.0 m): the waterways listed in chapter I of appendix 1 to these Recommendations; Zone 2 (height of up to 1.2 m): the waterways listed in chapter II of appendix 1 to these Recommendations; Zone 3 (height of up to 0.6 m): the waterways listed in chapter III of appendix 1 to these Recommendations. On inland waterways not listed in appendix 1 as belonging to navigational zones 1, 2 or 3, Administrations may establish technical requirements which differ from the provisions of these Recommendations. Such technical requirements should be adapted to the geographical, hydrological and navigational conditions prevailing on the respective inland waterway and 1/ Former chapter 1, see TRANS/SC.3/2004/1/Add.2. 2/ Article 2, section 1 of the draft Directive amending Directive 82/714/82 (CM3985/04). 3/ Directive, Article 2, section 2. 4/ Directive, Article 2, section 3, partly (sea-going vessels are excluded due to article 1-1.1). TRANS/SC.3/… page 5 should be equally applied to all vessels navigating on this waterway. It is understood, however, that vessels allowed to navigate on inland waterways belonging to zones 1, 2 and 3, satisfy the safety requirements applied on those unclassified inland waterways. 5/ 1-1.6 Unless otherwise stated, the provisions of the present Recommendations shall apply to new vessels that are intended to navigate in the navigational zones mentioned in 1-1.5, differentiated by the maximum significant wave height 6/ corresponding to a 5 per cent probability of over-topping. 1-1.7 These provisions shall apply to existing inland navigation vessels so long as the Administration considers them reasonable and practicable. 1-1.8 The Administration may permit derogations from these provisions for limited journeys of local interest or in harbour areas. The derogations in question and the journeys or area for which they are valid shall be specified in the Ship’s Certificate.7/ 1-1.9 Vessels intended for the carriage of dangerous goods shall also satisfy the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Inland Waterways (ADN). 1-2 DEFINITIONS 8/ Types of craft "craft": a vessel or item of floating equipment. "vessel": an inland waterway vessel or sea-going ship. "inland waterway vessel": a vessel intended solely or mainly for navigation on inland waterways. "tug": a vessel specially built to perform towing operations. "pusher": a vessel specially built to propel a pushed convoy. "barge": a dumb barge or tank barge. "ship-borne lighter": a lighter built to be carried aboard sea-going ships and to navigate on inland waterways. 5/ With the exception of the lakes Ladoga and Onega in the Russian Federation where the height of waves reaches 3 m and over. In the Russian Federation navigable zones are marked not with figures 1, 2 and 3 but with Cyrillic letters О, P and Л, respectively. 6/ In this provision, "significant wave height" means the average of heights of 10 per cent of the total number of waves having the greater heights measured between wave trough and wave crest, observed over a short period. 7/ Directive , article 7, section 2. 8/ The list of definitions has been extended to include the definitions used in the consolidated texts of the amended chapters and harmonized with the definitions used in Annex II of the draft revised EC Directive (definitions from Annex II are shown in italics). TRANS/SC.3/… page 6 "passenger vessel": a day trip or cabin vessel constructed and equipped to carry more than 12 passengers; "day-trip vessel": a passenger vessel without overnight passenger cabins. "cabin vessel": a passenger vessel with overnight passenger cabins. “high-speed vessel”: a motorized vessel, with the exception of small craft, capable of sailing at a speed greater than 40 km/h in relation to the surface of still water, when this is stated in its ship’s certificate. "floating equipment": a floating installation carrying working gear such as cranes, dredging equipment, pile drivers or elevators. “ship’s boat”: a boat used for multipurpose application including transportation of people or cargoes as well as in rescue purposes complying with the requirements of the basin Administration or the European Standard. “flush-deck vessel”: a vessel which has no superstructure on its freeboard deck. “vessel carrying fixed containers”: vessels all of whose containers are fixed and having the equipment necessary to secure containers to the satisfaction of the Administration. Assemblies of craft "convoy": a rigid or towed convoy of craft. "formation": the manner in which a convoy is assembled. "rigid convoy": a pushed convoy or breasted-up formation. "pushed convoy": a rigid assembly of craft of which at least one is positioned in front of the craft providing the power for propelling the convoy, known as the "pusher(s)"; a convoy composed of a pusher and a pushed craft coupled so as to permit guided articulation is also considered as rigid. "breasted-up formation": an assembly of craft coupled rigidly side by side, none of which is positioned in front of the craft propelling the assembly. "towed convoy": an assembly of one or more craft, floating establishments or floating installations towed by one or more self-propelled craft forming part of the convoy. Particular areas on board “machinery space”: is the part of the vessel housing the main and auxiliary machinery. The machinery space can be divided up into a main engine room, an engine room and a boiler room. “main engine room”: the space where the main machinery is installed; TRANS/SC.3/… page 7 “engine room”: the space where only auxiliary machinery, namely internal combustion engines, is installed; “boiler room”: the space housing a fuel-operated installation designed to produce steam or to heat a thermal fluid. “superstructure”: is a decked structure on the freeboard deck which extends from side to side of the vessel or whose side walls are not set inboard of the ship’s sides by more than 4% of the breadth (B). “enclosed superstructure”: is a superstructure having closed bulkheads of sufficient strength, permanently so assembled with the deck as to be watertight; In which the access openings, if any, in these bulkheads are fitted with watertight doors; In which all other openings in the sides or ends are fitted with watertight closures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rapport Toetsing Realisatiecijfers Vervoer Gevaarlijke Stoffen Over Het Water Aan De Risicoplafonds Basisnet
    RWS INFORMATIE Rapport toetsing realisatiecijfers vervoer gevaarlijke stoffen over het water aan de risicoplafonds Basisnet Jaar: 2018 Datum 20 mei 2019 Status Definitief RWS INFORMATIE Monitoringsrapportage water 2018 20 mei 2019 Colofon Uitgegeven door Rijkswaterstaat Informatie Mevr. M. Bakker, Dhr. G. Lems Telefoon 06-54674791, 06-21581392 Fax Uitgevoerd door Opmaak Datum 20 mei 2019 Status Definitief Versienummer 1 RWS INFORMATIE Monitoringsrapportage water 2018 20 mei 2019 Inhoud 1 Inleiding—6 1.1 Algemeen 1.2 Registratie en risicoberekening binnenvaart 1.3 Registratie en risicoberekening zeevaart 1.4 Referentiehoeveelheden 2 Toetsing aan de risicoplafonds—9 2.1 Overzicht toetsresultaten 2.2 Toetsresultaten per traject 2.3 Kwalitatieve risicoanalyse Basisnet-zeevaartroutes 3 Realisatie—13 Bijlage 1 ligging basisnetroutes per corridor Bijlage 2a realisatiecijfers binnenvaart op zeevaartroutes Bijlage 2b realisatiecijfers zeevaart op zeevaartroutes Bijlage 3 realisatiecijfers binnenvaart op binnenvaartroutes Bijlage 4 invoer en rekenresultaten RBMII berekeningen Bijlage 5 aandeel LNG in GF3 binnenvaart Bijlage 6 aandeel LNG in GF3 zeevaart RWS INFORMATIE | Monitoringsrapportage water 2018 | 20 mei 2019 1 Inleiding 1.1 Algemeen Op basis van artikel 15 van de Wet vervoer gevaarlijke stoffen en de artikelen 9 tot en met 12 van de Regeling Basisnet is de Minister verplicht om te onderzoeken in hoeverre één of meer van de in de Regeling Basisnet opgenomen risicoplafonds worden overschreden. De Regeling Basisnet is per 1 april 2015 in werking getreden. Deze rapportage bevat de resultaten van de toetsing van de realisatiecijfers van het vervoer gevaarlijke stoffen over het water aan de risicoplafonds Basisnet over het jaar 2018. De verscheidenheid aan vervoerde stoffen over de transportroutes is zo groot, dat een risicoanalyse per stof zeer arbeidsintensief zal zijn.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Planning Key Decision Room for the River English.Pdf
    SPATIAL PLANNING KEY DECISION ~ ROOM FOR THE RIVer Explanatory Memorandum 8 Waal (from Nijmegen to Gorinchem) 44 Contents of Explanatory Memorandum 8.1 Description of the area 44 8.2 Flood protection 44 8.3 Improvements in spatial quality 44 8.4 Overall approach to decisions for the long term 45 8.5 Short-term measures 45 8.6 Reserving land 46 Explanation 8.7 Opportunities for other measures 46 1 Introduction 9 9 Lower reaches of the rivers 48 1.1 Background 9 9.1 Description of the area 48 1.2 Procedure since publication of PKB Part 1 9 9.2 Flood protection 48 1.3 Decision-making 10 9.3 Improvements in spatial quality 49 1.4 Substantive changes compared to PKB Part 1 10 9.4 Overall approach to decisions for the long term 49 1.5 Substantive changes compared to PKB Part 3 11 9.5 Short-term measures 50 1.6 Guide to this publication 11 9.6 Reserving land 53 9.7 Opportunities for measures 53 2 Major shift in approach to flood protection 12 2.1 The background to this PKB 12 10 Lower Rhine/Lek 54 2.2 Major shift in approach 12 10.1 Introduction 54 2.3 Coordination with improvements in spatial quality 15 10.2 Flood protection 54 10.3 Improvements in spatial quality 54 3 Flood protection in the Rivers Region 16 10.4 Overall approach to decisions for the long term 55 3.1 The challenge for the PKB 16 10.5 Short-term measures 55 3.2 Long-term trends in river discharge levels and sea level 16 10.6 Reserving land 58 3.3 Targets to be met 18 10.7 Opportunities for measures 58 4 Improvements in spatial quality 25 11 IJssel 60 4.1 Introduction 25 11.1
    [Show full text]
  • Fvanderziel Master Thesis ... Ep2009.Pdf
    Appendix Master thesis: Movable water barrier for the 21st century Technical University Delft Section: Hydraulic Structures F. van der Ziel BSc September 15, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Literature Study (conclusions only) ...................................................................................... 2 B. Inland Water Navigations..................................................................................................... 3 B.1 CEMT-classes ............................................................................................................... 3 B.2 Current Navigation ....................................................................................................... 5 B.3 Future Navigation ........................................................................................................ 6 C. Locations Descriptions and Selections .................................................................................. 9 C.1 Criteria ......................................................................................................................... 9 C.2 Spui ............................................................................................................................ 11 C.3 Dordtsche Kil .............................................................................................................. 16 C.4 Beneden Merwede ..................................................................................................... 20 C.5 Lek ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acipenser Sturio L., 1758) in the Lower Rhine River, As Revealed by Telemetry Niels W
    Outmigration Pathways of Stocked Juvenile European Sturgeon (Acipenser Sturio L., 1758) in the Lower Rhine River, as Revealed by Telemetry Niels W. P. Brevé, Hendry Vis, Bram Houben, André Breukelaar, Marie-Laure Acolas To cite this version: Niels W. P. Brevé, Hendry Vis, Bram Houben, André Breukelaar, Marie-Laure Acolas. Outmigration Pathways of Stocked Juvenile European Sturgeon (Acipenser Sturio L., 1758) in the Lower Rhine River, as Revealed by Telemetry. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, Wiley, 2019, 35 (1), pp.61-68. 10.1111/jai.13815. hal-02267361 HAL Id: hal-02267361 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02267361 Submitted on 19 Aug 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Received: 5 December 2017 | Revised: 26 April 2018 | Accepted: 17 September 2018 DOI: 10.1111/jai.13815 STURGEON PAPER Outmigration pathways of stocked juvenile European sturgeon (Acipenser sturio L., 1758) in the Lower Rhine River, as revealed by telemetry Niels W. P. Brevé1 | Hendry Vis2 | Bram Houben3 | André Breukelaar4 | Marie‐Laure Acolas5 1Koninklijke Sportvisserij Nederland, Bilthoven, Netherlands Abstract 2VisAdvies BV, Nieuwegein, Netherlands Working towards a future Rhine Sturgeon Action Plan the outmigration pathways of 3ARK Nature, Nijmegen, Netherlands stocked juvenile European sturgeon (Acipenser sturio L., 1758) were studied in the 4Rijkswaterstaat (RWS), Rotterdam, River Rhine in 2012 and 2015 using the NEDAP Trail system.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Transport Fluvial En France Et En Europe
    l a n a k k c e b ü L Ems Jade k. - e . b Elbe W l Starkenborgh Ems Emden E tz Harinxmak kanaal ri ü M Oldenburg Elbe Pr. Margriet Ems Wittenberge sur et www.vnf.fr et Rathenow #adoptezleTransportfluvial localisation des écluses. des localisation la consultation des horaires de navigation et des avis à la batellerie et la la et batellerie la à avis des et navigation de horaires des consultation la en compte des contraintes (gabarit, avis à la batellerie, horaires de navigation), de horaires batellerie, la à avis (gabarit, contraintes des compte en LÉGENDE Gratuit et accessible à tous, cet outil permet un calcul d’itinéraire avec prise prise avec d’itinéraire calcul un permet outil cet tous, à accessible et Gratuit Elbe-Havelkanal Le calcul d’itinéraire fluvial d’itinéraire calcul Le Magdeburg Principaux ports publics de plus de 300 000 tonnes accessible aux opérateurs et au grand public. grand au et opérateurs aux accessible Accès ferroviaire réalisés par les impacts du transport sur la société (les coûts externes). EVE est est EVE externes). coûts (les société la sur transport du impacts les par réalisés ou multimodal fleuve-route. Son originalité réside dans l’indication des gains gains des l’indication dans réside originalité Son fleuve-route. multimodal ou Aken GRANDE-BRETAGNE Maas Axe fluvio-maritime Maas 2 MER DU NORD Saale de transport engendrées pour un trajet routier routier trajet un pour engendrées transport de Il compare les émissions de CO de émissions les compare Il EVE, l’Ecocalculateur de la Voie d’Eau Voie la de l’Ecocalculateur EVE, PAYS-BAS Ville A1 – Côte d’Azur, ADEME et Ministère de la Transition Energétique et solidaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithological Control on Scour Hole Formation in the Rhine-Meuse Estuary
    Delft University of Technology Lithological control on scour hole formation in the Rhine-Meuse Estuary Huismans, Ymkje; Koopmans, Hilde; Wiersma, Ane; de Haas, Tjalling; Berends, Koen; Sloff, Kees; Stouthamer, Esther DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107720 Publication date 2021 Document Version Final published version Published in Geomorphology Citation (APA) Huismans, Y., Koopmans, H., Wiersma, A., de Haas, T., Berends, K., Sloff, K., & Stouthamer, E. (2021). Lithological control on scour hole formation in the Rhine-Meuse Estuary. Geomorphology, 385, 1-15. [107720]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107720 Important note To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to a maximum of 10. Geomorphology 385 (2021) 107720 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Lithological control on scour hole formation in the Rhine-Meuse Estuary Ymkje Huismans a,b,⁎, Hilde Koopmans a,b, Ane Wiersma a, Tjalling de Haas c,KoenBerendsa, Kees Sloff a,b, Esther Stouthamer c a Deltares, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Verkenning Vaarwegsplitsing Dordtsche Kil - Hollandsch Diep
    Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat opq MIT Verkenning vaarwegsplitsing Dordtsche Kil - Hollandsch Diep Eindrapport Februari 2006 Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat opq MIT Verkenning vaarwegsplitsing Dordtsche Kil - Hollandsch Diep Eindrapport Februari 2006 . Colofon Uitgegeven door: Rijkswaterstaat Dienst Zuid-Holland Informatie: Telefoon: 010-4026314 Fax: Uitgevoerd door: Drs. O.C. Koedijk Opmaak: Datum: Februari 2006 Status: Definitief Versienummer: 2 3 MIT Verkenning vaarwegsplitsing Dortsche Kil - Hollandsch Diep Inhoudsopgave . 1. Inleiding 7 2. Aanleiding 8 2.1 Achtergrond 8 2.2 Historisch overzicht 8 2.3 Motivatie 9 3. Opdracht en uitleg 11 4. Aanpak en verantwoording 12 4.1 Inleiding 12 4.2 Probleemanalyse 12 4.3 Verkeersintensiteit, samenstelling en ontwikkeling 12 4.4 Vaarweg lay out en omgeving vaarweg 13 4.5 Hydrologische en meteorologische gegevens 13 4.6 Bestuurlijke aspecten en stakeholders 13 4.7 Verkeersafwikkeling en simulatie 13 5. Leeswijzer 14 6. Probleemanalyse 15 6.1 Inleiding 15 6.2 Probleemomschrijving 15 6.3 Afbakening studiegebied 16 6.4 Analyse relevante partijen 17 7. Vaarweg lay-out en omgeving vaarwegsplitsing 19 7.1 Inleiding 19 7.2 Samenstellende vaargeulen 19 7.2.1. Hollandsch Diep 19 7.2.2. Dordtsche Kil 19 7.2.3. Zuid-Hollandsch Diep 19 7.3 Visuele vensters 20 8. Hydrologie en meteorologie 21 8.1 Inleiding 21 8.2 Hydraulische informatie 21 8.2.1. Inleiding 21 8.2.2. Waterstanden 21 8.2.3. Stroomsnelheden en -richtingen 22 8.2.4. Golfhoogten 22 8.3 Meteorologie 24 8.3.1. Inleiding 24 8.3.2. Windsnelheden en windrichtingen 24 8.3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Uittrekmogelijkheden Voor Schieraal Via De Haringvlietsluizen
    De uittrekmogelijkheden voor schieraal via de haringvlietsluizen Dr. H.V. Winter & Dr. S.M. Bierman Rapport C155/10 IMARES Wageningen UR (IMARES - Institute for Marine Resources & Ecosystem Studies) Opdrachtgever: Ministerie van EL&I Directie AKV Postbus 20401 2500 EK DEN HAAG BAS code BO12-04 Publicatiedatum: 10 december 2010 IMARES is: • een onafhankelijk, objectief en gezaghebbend instituut dat kennis levert die noodzakelijk is voor integrale duurzame bescherming, exploitatie en ruimtelijk gebruik van de zee en kustzones; • een instituut dat de benodigde kennis levert voor een geïntegreerde duurzame bescherming, exploitatie en ruimtelijk gebruik van zee en kustzones; • een belangrijke, proactieve speler in nationale en internationale mariene onderzoeksnetwerken (zoals ICES en EFARO). P.O. Box 68 P.O. Box 77 P.O. Box 57 P.O. Box 167 1970 AB IJmuiden 4400 AB Yerseke 1780 AB Den Helder 1790 AD Den Burg Texel Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 26 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 59 Fax: +31 (0)223 63 06 87 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 62 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl © 2010 IMARES Wageningen UR IMARES is onderdeel van Stichting DLO De Directie van IMARES is niet aansprakelijk voor gevolgschade, KvK nr. 09098104, noch voor schade welke voortvloeit uit toepassingen van de IMARES BTW nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollands Diep | Juni 2016 Natura 2000 Deltawateren Beheerplan 2016-2022
    Hollands Diep | juni 2016 Natura 2000 Deltawateren Beheerplan 2016-2022 Foto: Loes de Jong Colofon Uitgegeven door Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu | Rijkswaterstaat Informatie www.rijkswaterstaat.nl Telefoon 0800-8002 (gratis) Uitgevoerd door Rijkswaterstaat Zee en Delta en Rijkswaterstaat West-Nederland Zuid i.s.m. Royal HaskoningDHV In samenwerking met Provincie Zuid-Holland, Provincie Zeeland, Provincie Noord-Brabant en ministerie van Economische Zaken Kwaliteitsborging Rijkwaterstaat Water, Verkeer en Leefomgeving en Rijkswaterstaat Corporate Dienst Datum 17 juni 2016 Status Beheerplan Inhoud Samenvatting—5 Inleiding—9 1 Kenmerken van Hollands Diep—10 1.1 Onmisbare schakel in trekvogelnetwerk—10 1.2 Abiotische kenmerken—11 1.3 Activiteiten en beheer in het Hollands Diep—14 2 Instandhoudingsdoelstellingen—16 2.1 Uitwerking van doelen in omvang, ruimte en tijd en huidige situatie—16 2.1.1 Habitattypen—17 2.1.2 Habitatsoorten—20 2.1.3 Kustbroedvogels—24 2.1.4 Moerasbroedvogels—26 2.1.5 Viseters—27 2.1.6 Eenden, ganzen en zwanen—29 3 Instandhoudingsmaatregelen—31 3.1 Maatregelen uit reeds vastgesteld beleid—31 3.2 Aanvullende instandhoudingsmaatregelen voor Natura 2000—33 3.3 Onderzoek en monitoring—34 4 Activiteiten en mitigatie—36 4.1 Stikstofdepositie en de Programmatische Aanpak Stikstof (PAS)—37 4.2 Vrijgestelde activiteiten zonder specifieke voorwaarden—38 4.3 Vrijgestelde activiteiten met specifieke voorwaarden—39 4.4 Activiteiten die (afzonderlijk) Nb-wet vergunningplichtig blijven—50 4.5 Niet Nb-wet vergunningplichtige activiteiten, wel mitigatie vereist—51 5 Worden de doelen bereikt?—53 5.1 Habitattypen—53 5.2 Habitatsoorten—54 5.3 Kustbroedvogels—55 5.4 Moerasbroedvogels—55 5.5 Viseters—56 5.6 Eenden, ganzen en zwanen—57 Bijlage A Activiteiten Hollands Diep zonder significante gevolgen en niet Nb-wet vergunningplichtig—58 Bijlage B Synopsistabel—60 Bijlage C Detailkaarten—62 Pagina 4 Samenvatting Natura 2000 is een samenhangend netwerk van beschermde natuurgebieden in de lidstaten van de Europese Unie (EU).
    [Show full text]
  • Concept Quickscan Volkerak-Zoommeer
    Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat opq Quick Scan Beheersvarianten Volkerak-Zoommeer Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat opq Quick Scan Beheersvarianten Volkerak-Zoommeer RWS Waterdienst W. Werkman Deltares J. van Zetten September 2008 Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat opq Inhoudsopgave . 1. Inleiding 5 1.1 Drie belangen, drie planstudies 5 1.2 Doel en afbakening 6 1.3 Leeswijzer 7 2. Het Delta model 8 2.1 Inleiding 8 2.2 Prestaties model 8 2.3 Stuurknoppen VZM 9 2.4 Randvoorwaarden 10 3. Scenario's 11 3.1 Inleiding 11 3.2 Keuze van scenario’s 11 3.3 Dimensies en sturing kunstwerken 12 3.4 Klimaatverandering 16 3.5 Jaarkeuze 17 4. Resultaten fase 1 18 4.1 Inleiding 18 4.2 Waterbalans 18 4.3 Waterstanden 21 4.4 Stroomsnelheid 28 4.5 Chlorositeit 30 5. Resultaten fase 2 32 5.1 Inleiding 32 5.2 Optimalisatie sturing en dimensionering van kunstwerken 32 5.3 Waterbalans 35 5.4 Waterstanden 35 5.5 Chlorositeit 39 5.6 Analyse gecombineerd scenario 41 6. Conclusies 44 7. Referenties 46 Bijlage A Debietverdeling per jaar in het noordelijk deltabekken en rond het Volkerak-Zoommeer 47 4 Quick Scan Beheersvarianten Volkerak-Zoommeer 1. Inleiding . Het Volkerak-Zoommeer (VZM) staat volop in de belangstelling. Vanuit het oogpunt van veiligheid, scheepvaart en waterkwaliteit wordt gekeken naar mogelijkheden om de huidige situatie te verbeteren. Aangezien ingrepen in de waterhuishouding ten behoeve van een specifiek doeleinde beperkend of zelfs strijdig kunnen zijn met de overige aandachtsvelden kunnen de betreffende studies (Planstudie Waterkwaliteit VZM, Planstudie Waterberging VZM en de studie Rijn- Schelde corridor scheepvaart) niet los van elkaar worden bezien.
    [Show full text]
  • Bijlage 1: Functietoekenning Gebieden En Gebiedsdelen Met Natuurwaarden
    Bijlage 1: functietoekenning gebieden en gebiedsdelen met natuurwaarden Locaties met ‘Natuur’ als enige functie Karakteristiek - nevenfuncties* zijn niet toegestaan Deze is niet altijd volledig,van de kennis van de soorten die er voorkomen is vaak gering en eenzijdig * m.u.v. een waterhuishoudkundige functie Oevers Vlij, incl. eilandje bij 4. Wilgenbos, getijdenwerking baden Powellbrug Gevarieerde aquatische vegetatie met o.a. 8. Kwelsloten Jeugddorp Waterviolier in dijksloot 13. Huis te Merwede Spontane, verruigde vegetatie, moeras Oeverlanden Beneden Getijdemoeras 14. Merwede bij DuPont Baanegat (wilgenvloedbos Wilgenvloedbos en getijdenkreek, Blauwe en water achter stortplaats 15. reigerkolonie, IJsvogel, Bever, Ree, Crayestein-west en Rivierrombout, vissen afvalwaterzuivering) 18. Wantijkil Kilrestant met wilgenbos Spontaan wilgenbos en moerasvegetaties, 19. Oeverzones Wantij Bever, IJsvogel, Spindotter, Blauwborst Bos/rietruigte tussen N3 , 28. Spontane moerasvegetaties provinciale weg en spoor 44. Klein -Amstelwijck Bosflora van het Elzen-Iepenbos Bijlagen Vervolg: Karakteristiek Locaties met ‘Natuur’ als enige functie - nevenfuncties* zijn niet toegestaan Deze is niet altijd volledig,van de kennis van de soorten die er voorkomen is vaak gering en eenzijdig * m.u.v. een waterhuishoudkundige functie Restant Westkil tussen 47. Rijksstraatweg, N217 en Spontane moerasvegetaties, IJsvogel Dordtse Kil 2 (Zernikestraat) Eilandjes in de Oostkil a an Ruigte en spontane bosopslag, 56. weerszijden van de geïsoleerde ligging Assumburg Bijlagen Locaties met ‘Natuur’ als hoofdfunctie Karakteristiek - nevenfuncties zijn toegestaan Deze is niet altijd volledig,van de kennis van de soorten die er voorkomen is vaak gering en eenzijdig Moeraszone Jager - en Aangelegd moeras, nog in pril 7. Windhondpolder (langs ontwikkelingsstadium Noordendijk en Wantijdijk) 11. Moeraszone volkstuinen Aangelegd moeras met knotwilgen Molenvliet met oevers en 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd and Mphil Thesis Classes
    Erosion processes and bed level maintenance strategies in the tide influenced branches of the Rhine-Meuse delta T.C. Smits Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Section Hydraulic Engineering A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science December 2011 Graduation Committee Prof. Dr. Ir. H.J. De Vriend Delft University of Technology Section Hydraulic Engineering Dr. Ir. C.J. Sloff Delft University of Technology Section Hydraulic Engineering Dr. Ir. E. Mosselman Delft University of Technology Section Hydraulic Engineering Dr. G.J. Weltje Delft University of Technology Section Applied Geology Photo on the title page: https://beeldbank.rws.nl, Rijkswaterstaat. ii Abstract Due to the closure of the Haringvliet in 1970 as part of the Delta works and the opening of the Beerdam in 1997, the course of the tidal flow in the Rhine-Meuse delta has changed. The tidal flow from and towards the Haringvliet is now completely taking place through the branches that connect the Haringvliet with the Nieuwe Maas and Nieuwe Waterweg. This causes these branches to erode by the increase of the tidal prism. The erosion problems occur in the central parts of the Rhine-Meuse delta, which, amongst other rivers, includes the rivers Spui, Oude Maas, Noord and Dordtsche Kil. The presence of sand, clay and peat layers in the branches causes the erosion mechanism to be rather complex. The alternation of sand and clay layers in the area causes the erosion to be non-uniformly distributed, resulting in deep local scour holes. The goal of this research is to determine an adequate maintenance strategy for the problem area.
    [Show full text]