Energy Bandwidth for Petroleum Refining Processes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reasoned Request on Failure of Bosnia Herzegovina to Comply With
ANNEX 9a/14th MC/10-08-2016 TO THE MINISTERIAL COUNCIL OF THE ENERGY COMMUNITY represented by the Presidency and the Vice-Presidency of the Energy Community REASONED REQUEST in Case ECS-2/13 Submitted pursuant to Article 90 of the Treaty establishing the Energy Community and Article 29 of Procedural Act No 2008/1/MC-EnC of the Ministerial Council of the Energy Community of 27 June 2008 on the Rules of Procedure for Dispute Settlement under the Treaty, the SECRETARIAT OF THE ENERGY COMMUNITY against BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA seeking a Decision from the Ministerial Council that Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1. by failing to ensure within the prescribed time limit that heavy fuel oils are not used if their sulphur content exceeds 1.00 % by mass in the entire territory of the Contracting Party, Bosnia and Herzegovina has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) of Directive 1999/32/EC in conjunction with Article 16 of the Treaty establishing the Energy Community; 2. by failing to ensure within the prescribed time limit that gas oils are not used if their sulphur content exceeds 0.1 % by mass in the entire territory of the Contracting Party, Bosnia and Herzegovina has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) of Directive 1999/32/EC in conjunction with Article 16 of the Treaty establishing the Energy Community. The Secretariat of the Energy Community has the honour of submitting the following Reasoned Request to the Ministerial Council. I. Relevant Facts (1) As a Contracting Party to the Treaty establishing the Energy Community (“the Treaty”), Bosnia and Herzegovina is under an obligation to implement the acquis communautaire on environment as listed in Article 16 of the Treaty. -
1 Refinery and Petrochemical Processes
3 1 Refinery and Petrochemical Processes 1.1 Introduction The combination of high demand for electric cars and higher automobile engine effi- ciency in the future will mean less conversion of petroleum into fuels. However, the demand for petrochemicals is forecast to rise due to the increase in world popula- tion. With this, it is expected that modern and more innovative technologies will be developed to serve the growth of the petrochemical market. In a refinery process, petroleum is converted into petroleum intermediate prod- ucts, including gases, light/heavy naphtha, kerosene, diesel, light gas oil, heavy gas oil, and residue. From these intermediate refinery product streams, several fuels such as fuel gas, liquefied petroleum gas, gasoline, jet fuel, kerosene, auto diesel, and other heavy products such as lubricants, bunker oil, asphalt, and coke are obtained. In addition, these petroleum intermediates can be further processed and separated into products for petrochemical applications. In this chapter, petroleum will be introduced first. Petrochemicals will be intro- duced in the second part of the chapter. Petrochemicals – the main subject of this book – will address three major areas, (i) the production of the seven cornerstone petrochemicals: methane and synthesis gas, ethylene, propylene, butene, benzene, toluene, and xylenes; (ii) the uses of the seven cornerstone petrochemicals, and (iii) the technology to separate petrochemicals into individual components. 1.2 Petroleum Petroleum is derived from the Latin words “petra” and “oleum,” which means “rock” and “oil,” respectively. Petroleum also is known as crude oil or fossil fuel. It is a thick, flammable, yellow-to-black mixture of gaseous, liquid, and solid hydrocarbons formed from the remains of plants and animals. -
The Chemistry of Sulfur in Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Catalytic Reduction of Sulfur in Fluid Catalytic Cracking Rick Wormsbecher Collaborators Grace Davison Laboratoire Catalyse et Spectrochimie, CNRS, Université de Caen Ruizhong Hu Michael Ziebarth Fabian Can Wu-Cheng Cheng Francoise Maugé Robert H. Harding Arnaud Travert Xinjin Zhao Terry Roberie Ranjit Kumar Thomas Albro Robert Gatte Outline • Review of fluid catalytic cracking. • Sulfur balance and sulfur cracking chemistry. • Catalytic reduction of sulfur by Zn aluminate/alumina. Fluid Catalytic Cracking • Refinery process that “cracks” high molecular weight hydrocarbons to lower molecular weight. • Refinery process that provides ~50 % of all transportation fuels indirectly. • Provides ~35 % of total gasoline pool directly from FCC produced naphtha. • ~80 % of the sulfur in gasolines comes from the FCC naphtha. Sulfur in Gasoline • Sulfur compounds reversibly poison the auto emission catalysts, increasing NOx and hydrocarbon emission. SOx emissions as well. • World-wide regulations to limit the sulfur content of transportation fuels. – 10 - 30 ppm gasoline. • Sulfur can be removed by hydrogenation chemistry. – Expensive. – Lowers fuel quality. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit Products Riser Flue Gas Reactor (~500 ºC) Regenerator (~725 ºC) Reaction is endothermic. 400 tons Catalyst circulates from catalyst Riser to Regenerator. inventory 50, 000 Air Feedstock barrels/day Carbon Distribution H2 ~0.05 % Flare C1 ~1.0 % Flare Petrochem Feed C2-C4 ~14-18 % Naphtha MW ~330 g/mole C5-C11 ~50 % C12-C22 ~15-25 % LCO C22+ ~5-15 % HCO Coke ~3-10 % -
The Chemistry of Refining Crude Oil SPN#12
The Chemistry of Refining Crude Oil SPN LESSON #12 LEARNING OUTCOME: Students come to view energy from several viewpoints. They work with the processes of • Phase changes and the many energy transformations and transfers involved in that physical change; • chemical change and the energy it releases. LESSON OVERVIEW: The fractional distillation of crude oil is featured. This major fossil fuel of the modern age is viewed as an example of stored chemical energy. Alcohol and water are separated and recaptured by taking advantage of the differences in the two substances’ boiling points. The many components of crude oil are explored and students are introduced to organic chemical formulas, characteristics of changes in phases, and laboratory distillation procedures. GRADE-LEVEL APPROPRIATENESS: This Level II Physical Setting, technology education lesson is intended for students in grades 5–8. MATERIALS (per group) Safety goggles (per person) Lab apron (per person) Bunsen burner Ring stand with utility clamp Metal pan 3 medium test tubes Test tube rack Boiling chip 2-hole stopper 10 cm glass tubing with 90o bend Thermometer 15 mL of isopropyl alcohol–water mixture nyserda.ny.gov/School-Power-Naturally Stirring rod Graduated cylinder Grease pencil or marker 4 paper strips, 10 cm x 1 cm 60 cm rubber tubing SAFETY Students should be made familiar with proper laboratory safety procedures including the location of fire extinguishers, fire blankets, and safety showers (where available). Instruct students regarding the proper and safe use of Bunsen burners and matches, and stress the importance of keeping the volatile components of the fractional distillation away from the flame during the collection of distillates. -
Naphtha Safety Data Sheet According to Regulation (EC) No
Naphtha Safety Data Sheet according to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 (REACH) with its amendment Regulation (EU) 2015/830 Revision date: 29 Dec 2020 Version: 4.0 SECTION 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1. Product identifier Product form : Substance (UVCB) Trade name : Naphtha Chemical name : Solvent naphtha (petroleum), light aliph.; Low boiling point naphtha; [A complex combination of hydrocarbons obtained from the distillation of crude oil or natural gasoline. It consists predominantly of saturated hydrocarbons having carbon numbers predominantly in the range of C5 through C10 and boiling in the range of approximately 35°C to 160°C (95°F to 320°F).] IUPAC name : Solvent naphtha (petroleum), light aliph. EC Index-No. : 649-267-00-0 EC-No. : 265-192-2 CAS-No. : 64742-89-8 REACH registration No : 01-2119471306-40 Type of product : Hydrocarbons Synonyms : Solvent naphtha (petroleum), light aliph. Product group : Raw material BIG No : F06734 1.2. Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against 1.2.1. Relevant identified uses Main use category : Industrial use Use of the substance/mixture : Chemical raw material Function or use category : Intermediates Title Life cycle stage Use descriptors Use of substance as intermediate Industrial SU8, SU9, PROC1, PROC2, PROC3, PROC8a, PROC8b, (ES Ref.: ES 2) PROC15, PROC28, ERC6a Manufacture of substance Manufacture PROC1, PROC2, PROC3, PROC8a, PROC8b, PROC15, (ES Ref.: ES 1) PROC28, ERC1 Full text of use descriptors: see section 16 1.2.2. Uses advised against No additional information available NOR1.3. Details of the supplier of product safety information sheet Manufacturer Only Representative ZapSibNeftekhim LLC Gazprom Marketing and Trading France Promzona avenue des Champs-Elysées 68 626150 Tobolsk, Tyumen region - Russion Federation 75008 Paris - France T +7 (3456) 398-000 - F +7 (3456) 266-449 T +33 1 42 99 73 50 - F +33 1 42 99 73 99 [email protected] [email protected] 1.4. -
Oil Refinery Sector
Gujarat Cleaner Production Centre - ENVIS Centre CLEANER PRODUCTION OPPURTUNITIES IN OIL REFINERY SECTOR Gujarat Cleaner Production Centre - ENVIS Centre OIL REFINERY An oil refinery or petroleum refinery is an industrial process plant where crude oil is processed and refined into more useful products such as petroleum naphtha, gasoline, diesel fuel, asphalt base, heating oil, kerosene and liquefied petroleum gas. Oil refineries are typically large, sprawling industrial complexes with extensive piping running throughout, carrying streams of fluids between large chemical processing units. Common process units found in a refinery: • Desalter unit washes out salt from the crude oil before it enters the atmospheric distillation unit. • Atmospheric distillation unit distills crude oil into fractions. • Vacuum distillation unit further distills residual bottoms after atmospheric distillation. • Naphtha hydrotreater unit uses hydrogen to desulfurize naphtha from atmospheric distillation. Must hydrotreat the naphtha before sending to a Catalytic Reformer unit. • Catalytic reformer unit is used to conver t the naphtha-boiling range molecules into higher octane reformate (reformer product). The reformate has higher content of aromatics and cyclic hydrocarbons). An important byproduct of a r eformer is hydrogen released during the catalyst reaction. The hydrogen is used either in the hydrotreater or the hydrocracker. • Distillate hydrotreater unit desulfurizes distillates (such as diesel) after atmospheric distillation. • Fluid catalytic cracker (FCC) unit upgrades heavier fractions into lighter, more valuable products. • Hydrocracker unit uses hydrogen to upgrade heavier fractions into lighter, more valuable products. • Visbreaking unit upgrades heavy residual oils by thermally cracking them into li ghter, more valuable reduced viscosity products. • Merox unit treats LPG, kerosene or jet fuel by oxidizing mercaptans to organic disulfides. -
Tailoring Diesel Bioblendstock from Integrated Catalytic Upgrading of Carboxylic Acids: a “Fuel Property First” Approach Xiangchen Huoa,B, Nabila A
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Green Chemistry. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 Tailoring Diesel Bioblendstock from Integrated Catalytic Upgrading of Carboxylic Acids: A “Fuel Property First” Approach Xiangchen Huoa,b, Nabila A. Huqa, Jim Stunkela, Nicholas S. Clevelanda, Anne K. Staracea, Amy E. Settlea,b, Allyson M. Yorka,b, Robert S. Nelsona, David G. Brandnera, Lisa Foutsa, Peter C. St. Johna, Earl D. Christensena, Jon Lueckea, J. Hunter Mackc, Charles S. McEnallyd, Patrick A. Cherryd, Lisa D. Pfefferled, Timothy J. Strathmannb, Davinia Salvachúaa, Seonah Kima, Robert L. McCormicka, Gregg T. Beckhama, Derek R. Vardona* aNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO, United States bColorado School of Mines, 1500 Illinois St., Golden, CO, United States cUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell, 220 Pawtucket St., Lowell, MA, United States dYale University, 9 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT, United States *[email protected] Section S1: Experimental Methods Catalyst synthesis and characterization Pt/Al2O3 catalyst was prepared by strong electrostatic adsorption method with chloroplatinic acid hexahydrate as Pt precursor. Al2O3 of 30-50 mesh and Pt precursor were added to deionized water, and solution pH was adjusted to 3 by adding HCl. After stirring overnight, the catalyst particles were recovered by filtration extensively washed with -1 deionized water. The catalyst was dried in the air and reduced in flowing H2 (200 mL min ) at 300°C for 4 h. BET surface area was determined by nitrogen physisorption using a Quadrasorb SI™ surface area analyzer from Quantachrome Instruments. Samples of ~80–120 mg were measured using a 55-point nitrogen adsorption/desorption curve at -196°C. -
Exxonmobil Torrance Refinery Electrostatic Precipitator Explosion Torrance, California
InvestigationInvestigation Report Report ExxonMobil Torrance Refinery Electrostatic Precipitator Explosion Torrance, California Incident Date: February 18, 2015 On-Site Property Damage, Catalyst Particles Released to Community, Near Miss in MHF Alkylation Unit No. 2015-02-I-CA KEY ISSUES: • Lack of Safe Operating Limits and Operating Procedure • Safeguard Effectiveness • Operating Equipment Beyond Safe Operating Life • Re-use of Previous Procedure Variance Without Sufficient Hazard Analysis Published May 2017 CSB · ExxonMobil Torrance Refinery Investigation Report The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is an independent Federal agency whose mission is to drive chemical safety change through independent investigations to protect people and the environment. The CSB is a scientific investigative organization; it is not an enforcement or regulatory body. Established by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the CSB is responsible for determining accident causes, issuing safety recommendations, studying chemical safety issues, and evaluating the effectiveness of other government agencies involved in chemical safety. More information about the CSB is available at www.csb.gov. The CSB makes public its actions and decisions through investigative publications, all of which may include safety recommendations when appropriate. Examples of the types of publications include: CSB Investigation Reports: formal, detailed reports on significant chemical accidents and include key findings, root causes, and safety recommendations. CSB Investigation Digests: plain-language summaries of Investigation Reports. CSB Case Studies: examines fewer issues than a full investigative report, case studies present investigative information from specific accidents and include a discussion of relevant prevention practices. CSB Safety Bulletins: short, general-interest publications that provide new or timely information intended to facilitate the prevention of chemical accidents. -
ADVANCES in FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING (November 2005)
Abstract Process Economics Program Report 195A ADVANCES IN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING (November 2005) Recent emphasis in fluid catalytic cracking is on maximum light olefins production, gasoline sulfur reduction and compliance with FCCU NOx and SOx emissions requirements. New cracking catalysts and additives for the reduction of NOx, SOx and gasoline sulfur continue to significantly improve FCCU operation. New hardware designs offer improved unit operation and efficiency. Areas of recent new hardware design improvements include the standpipe inlet, third stage cyclones, spent catalyst distributor and catalyst stripping. Wet gas scrubbers or selective catalytic reduction may now be required in some cases to meet emissions requirements. This report provides an overview of FCC developments in catalyst, process and hardware technologies since PEP Report 195, Advances in Fluid Catalytic Cracking, issued in 1991. The report then develops process economics for cracking the most common type of FCC feedstock, vacuum gas oil. PEP Report 228, Refinery Residue Upgrading, issued in 2000 reviews the special issues and technology of Residual Fluid Catalytic Cracking (RFCC) and develops process economics for cracking a residual feedstock. Since the refinery production of light olefins such as propylene offers refiners in some regions, especially Asia and Western Europe, an opportunity for profit, the process economics of maximum light olefins FCC from VGO are developed. Air emissions (SOX, NOX) from FCCUs and the reduction of FCC gasoline sulfur are major environmental issues discussed. Professionals and managers involved in the energy industry who manage, research, develop, plan, operate, design plants or manage investments in the petroleum refining and allied industries could benefit from the information contained in this report. -
Laboratory Rectifying Stills of Glass 2
» LABORATORY RECTIFYING STILLS OF GLASS 2 By Johannes H. Bruun 3 and Sylvester T. Schicktanz 3 ABSTRACT A complete description is given of a set of all-glass rectifying stills, suitable for distillation at pressures ranging from atmospheric down to about 50 mm. The stills are provided with efficient bubbling-cap columns containing 30 to 60 plates. Adiabatic conditions around the column are maintained by surrounding it with a jacket provided with a series of independent electrical heating units. Suitable means are provided for adjusting or maintaining the reflux ratio at the top of the column. For the purpose of conveniently obtaining an accurate value of the true boiling points of the distillates a continuous boiling-point apparatus is incor- porated in the receiving system. An efficient still of the packed-column type for distillations under pressures less than 50 mm is also described. Methods of operation and efficiency tests are given for the stills. CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 852 II. General features of the still assembly 852 III. Still pot 853 IV. Filling tube and heater for the still pot 853 V. Rectifying column 856 1. General features 856 2. Large-size column 856 3. Medium-size column 858 4. Small-size column 858 VI. Column jacket 861 VII. Reflux regulator 861 1. With variable reflux ratio 861 2. With constant reflux ratio 863 VIII. The continuous boiling-point apparatus 863 IX. Condensers and receiver 867 X. The mounting of the still 867 XI. Manufacture and transportation of the bubbling-cap still 870 XII. Operation of the bubbling-cap still 870 XIII. -
(HDS) Unit for Petroleum Naphtha at 3500 Barrels Per Day
Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 9 (2015) 88-100 EISSN 2392-2192 Design Parameters for a Hydro desulfurization (HDS) Unit for Petroleum Naphtha at 3500 Barrels per Day Debajyoti Bose University of Petroleum & Energy Studies, College of Engineering Studies, P.O. Bidholi via- Prem Nagar, Dehradun 248007, India E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT The present work reviews the setting up of a hydrodesulphurization unit for petroleum naphtha. Estimating all the properties of the given petroleum fraction including its density, viscosity and other parameters. The process flow sheet which gives the idea of necessary equipment to be installed, then performing all material and energy balance calculations along with chemical and mechanical design for the entire setup taking into account every instrument considered. The purpose of this review paper takes involves an industrial process, a catalytic chemical process widely used to remove sulfur (S) from naphtha. Keywords: hydro desulfurization, naphtha, petroleum, sulfur Relevance to Design Practice - The purpose of removing the sulfur is to reduce the sulfur dioxide emissions that result from using those fuels in automotive vehicles, aircraft, railroad locomotives, gas or oil burning power plants, residential and industrial furnaces, and other forms of fuel combustion. World Scientific News 9 (2015) 88-100 1. INTRODUCTION Hydrodesulphurization (HDS) is a catalytic chemical process widely used to remove sulfur (S) from natural gas and from refined petroleum products such as gasoline or petrol, jet fuel, kerosene, diesel fuel, and fuel oils. The purpose of removing the sulfur is to reduce the sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions that result from various combustion practices. -
BENZENE Disclaimer
United States Office of Air Quality EPA-454/R-98-011 Environmental Protection Planning And Standards June 1998 Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 AIR EPA LOCATING AND ESTIMATING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SOURCES OF BENZENE Disclaimer This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and has been approved for publication. Mention of trade names and commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of use. EPA-454/R-98-011 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF TABLES.....................................................x LIST OF FIGURES.................................................. xvi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................xx 1.0 PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT .......................................... 1-1 2.0 OVERVIEW OF DOCUMENT CONTENTS.............................. 2-1 3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ...................................... 3-1 3.1 NATURE OF POLLUTANT..................................... 3-1 3.2 OVERVIEW OF PRODUCTION AND USE ......................... 3-4 3.3 OVERVIEW OF EMISSIONS.................................... 3-8 4.0 EMISSIONS FROM BENZENE PRODUCTION ........................... 4-1 4.1 CATALYTIC REFORMING/SEPARATION PROCESS................ 4-7 4.1.1 Process Description for Catalytic Reforming/Separation........... 4-7 4.1.2 Benzene Emissions from Catalytic Reforming/Separation .......... 4-9 4.2 TOLUENE DEALKYLATION AND TOLUENE DISPROPORTIONATION PROCESS ............................ 4-11 4.2.1 Toluene Dealkylation