Locomotion Control Experiments in Cockroach Robot

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Locomotion Control Experiments in Cockroach Robot LOCOMOTION CONTROL EXPERIMENTS IN COCKROACH ROBOT WITH ARTIFICAL MUSCLES by Jongung Choi Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Advisor: Dr. Roger D. Quinn Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August, 2005 Copyright © 2005 by Jongung Choi All rights reserved CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of Jongung Choi candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree *. Committee Chair: ________________________________________________ Dr. Roger D. Quinn Dissertation Advisor Professor, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Committee: _____________________________________________________ Dr. Joseph M. Mansour Professor, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Committee: _____________________________________________________ Dr. Roy E. Ritzmann Professor, Department of Biology Committee: _____________________________________________________ Dr. Robert F. Kirsch Associate Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering August, 2005 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Waiver of Reproduction Rights To HyeYoung Jeon Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified: do not be discouraged, for the LORD your God will be with you wherever you go. Joshua 1:9 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. vi List of Tables .................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures.................................................................................................................... x Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... xvii Abstract............................................................................................................................ xix Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Cockroach-Inspired Robots .................................................................... 2 1.2 Dissertation Outline ................................................................................ 4 References........................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2 ........................................................................................................................... 8 Background ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Insect-inspired robots.............................................................................. 8 References......................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 3 ......................................................................................................................... 16 Leg Control...................................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Workspace............................................................................................. 16 3.1.1 Workspace of Front Leg ................................................................... 19 3.1.2 Workspace of Middle Leg ................................................................ 23 3.1.3 Workspace of Rear Leg .................................................................... 26 3.2 Inverse Kinematics................................................................................ 29 3.2.1 Modified Moore-Penrose Method..................................................... 29 3.2.2 Inverse Kinematics Solution............................................................. 32 3.3 Neural Network..................................................................................... 36 3.4 Training of Neural Network.................................................................. 39 3.5 Validating Neural Networks ................................................................. 42 3.5.1 Design of the Desired Foot Path ....................................................... 43 3.5.2 Comparison of Desired and Actual Paths using Neural Networks... 45 3.5.3 Discussion......................................................................................... 48 References......................................................................................................... 49 Chapter 4 ......................................................................................................................... 50 Coordination of Legs ...................................................................................................... 50 4.1 Pre-Planned Tripod Gait....................................................................... 50 4.2 Cruse Control for Gait Generation........................................................ 52 References......................................................................................................... 57 Chapter 5 ......................................................................................................................... 59 Dynamic Simulation of Robot V.................................................................................... 59 5.1 Mechanics of Robot V .......................................................................... 60 5.2 Braided Pneumatic Actuator................................................................. 63 5.2.1 McKibben vs. Festo Actuator ........................................................... 63 5.2.2 Testing of Festo Actuator Properties ................................................ 65 5.2.3 Modeling of Festo Actuators ............................................................ 69 5.3 Valve System of Robot V ..................................................................... 72 vi 5.3.1 Inlet and Outlet Valves ........................................................................ 73 5.3.2 Modeling of Valve ............................................................................... 75 5.4 Applied Joint Torque ............................................................................ 76 5.5 Dynamic Simulation of Robot V .......................................................... 78 5.5.1 Flow Chart of Simulation.................................................................. 79 5.5.2 File System of Simulation................................................................. 82 References......................................................................................................... 86 Chapter 6 ......................................................................................................................... 88 Metrics ............................................................................................................................. 88 6.1 Joint Angle Position Error .................................................................... 88 6.2 Foot Position ......................................................................................... 91 6.3 Velocity................................................................................................. 93 6.4 Body motions during walking............................................................... 93 References......................................................................................................... 93 Chapter 7 ......................................................................................................................... 94 Simulation Results .......................................................................................................... 94 7.1 Air and Ground Walking with Pre-Planned Gait.................................. 94 7.1.1 Joint Angles for Air and Ground Walking with Pre-Planned Gait ... 94 7.1.2 Foot Paths and Body Bounce using Pre-Planned Gait...................... 98 7.2 Air and Ground Walking with Cruse Gait Control............................. 101 7.2.1 Joint Angles for Air and Ground Walking using Cruse Controller 101 7.2.2 Foot Path and Body Bounce using Cruse Controller...................... 105 7.3 Conclusions......................................................................................... 107 References....................................................................................................... 108 Chapter 8 .......................................................................................................................110 Implementation into Robot V Hardware.................................................................... 110 8.1 Robot V Sensors ................................................................................. 110 8.1.1 Joint Angle Sensor .......................................................................... 111 8.1.2 Pressure sensor................................................................................ 112 8.2 Robot V Hardware Setup.................................................................... 112 8.3 Initial Implementation of Leg Control................................................ 114 8.3.1 Initial implementation
Recommended publications
  • Control in Robotics
    Control in Robotics Mark W. Spong and Masayuki Fujita Introduction The interplay between robotics and control theory has a rich history extending back over half a century. We begin this section of the report by briefly reviewing the history of this interplay, focusing on fundamentals—how control theory has enabled solutions to fundamental problems in robotics and how problems in robotics have motivated the development of new control theory. We focus primarily on the early years, as the importance of new results often takes considerable time to be fully appreciated and to have an impact on practical applications. Progress in robotics has been especially rapid in the last decade or two, and the future continues to look bright. Robotics was dominated early on by the machine tool industry. As such, the early philosophy in the design of robots was to design mechanisms to be as stiff as possible with each axis (joint) controlled independently as a single-input/single-output (SISO) linear system. Point-to-point control enabled simple tasks such as materials transfer and spot welding. Continuous-path tracking enabled more complex tasks such as arc welding and spray painting. Sensing of the external environment was limited or nonexistent. Consideration of more advanced tasks such as assembly required regulation of contact forces and moments. Higher speed operation and higher payload-to-weight ratios required an increased understanding of the complex, interconnected nonlinear dynamics of robots. This requirement motivated the development of new theoretical results in nonlinear, robust, and adaptive control, which in turn enabled more sophisticated applications. Today, robot control systems are highly advanced with integrated force and vision systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Muscle Models Regularize Motion in a Robotic Leg with Neurally-Based Step Generation
    2007 IEEE International Conference on WeB9.1 Robotics and Automation Roma, Italy, 10-14 April 2007 Simple Muscle Models Regularize Motion in a Robotic Leg with Neurally-Based Step Generation Brandon L. Rutter, Member, IEEE, William A. Lewinger, Member, IEEE, Marcus Blümel, Ansgar Büschges, Roger D. Quinn Abstract— Robotic control systems inspired by animals are such systems can exhibit, and a corresponding limit to the enticing to the robot designer due to their promises of complexity of locomotion tasks they can solve. simplicity, elegance and robustness. While there has been Coordination between legs to produce gaits has been success in applying general and behaviorally-based knowledge successfully implemented [6, 7, 8, 11] using rules based on of biological systems to control, we are investigating the use of animal behavior [12]. Though these methods produce control based on known and hypothesized neural pathways in specific model animals. Neural motor systems in animals are coordination between legs, subsystems must coordinate the only meaningful in the context of their mechanical body, and motion within each leg. This has typically been done using the behavior of the system can be highly dependent on inverse kinematics [6, 11]. While this is conceptually nonlinear and dynamic properties of the mechanical part of the straightforward, dealing with dynamic environments and system. It is therefore reasonable to believe that to reproduce perturbations can be a matter of considerable effort. In behavior, the physical characteristics of the biological system addition, these methods require trigonometric and other must also be modeled or accounted for. In this paper we examine the performance of a robotic system with three types computations which are often beyond the capability of of muscle model: null, piecewise-constant, and linear.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Robot Locomotion
    Principles of robot locomotion Sven Böttcher Seminar ‘Human robot interaction’ Index of contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................................................................1 2. Legged Locomotion...................................................................................................................................2 2.1 Stability................................................................................................................................................3 2.2 Leg configuration.................................................................................................................................4 2.3 One leg.................................................................................................................................................5 2.4 Two legs...............................................................................................................................................7 2.5 Four legs ..............................................................................................................................................9 2.6 Six legs...............................................................................................................................................11 3 Wheeled Locomotion................................................................................................................................13 3.1 Wheel types .......................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Ph. D. Thesis Stable Locomotion of Humanoid Robots Based
    Ph. D. Thesis Stable locomotion of humanoid robots based on mass concentrated model Author: Mario Ricardo Arbul´uSaavedra Director: Carlos Balaguer Bernaldo de Quiros, Ph. D. Department of System and Automation Engineering Legan´es, October 2008 i Ph. D. Thesis Stable locomotion of humanoid robots based on mass concentrated model Author: Mario Ricardo Arbul´uSaavedra Director: Carlos Balaguer Bernaldo de Quiros, Ph. D. Signature of the board: Signature President Vocal Vocal Vocal Secretary Rating: Legan´es, de de Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 HistoryofRobots........................... 2 1.1.1 Industrialrobotsstory. 2 1.1.2 Servicerobots......................... 4 1.1.3 Science fiction and robots currently . 10 1.2 Walkingrobots ............................ 10 1.2.1 Outline ............................ 10 1.2.2 Themes of legged robots . 13 1.2.3 Alternative mechanisms of locomotion: Wheeled robots, tracked robots, active cords . 15 1.3 Why study legged machines? . 20 1.4 What control mechanisms do humans and animals use? . 25 1.5 What are problems of biped control? . 27 1.6 Features and applications of humanoid robots with biped loco- motion................................. 29 1.7 Objectives............................... 30 1.8 Thesiscontents ............................ 33 2 Humanoid robots 35 2.1 Human evolution to biped locomotion, intelligence and bipedalism 36 2.2 Types of researches on humanoid robots . 37 2.3 Main humanoid robot research projects . 38 2.3.1 The Humanoid Robot at Waseda University . 38 2.3.2 Hondarobots......................... 47 2.3.3 TheHRPproject....................... 51 2.4 Other humanoids . 54 2.4.1 The Johnnie project . 54 2.4.2 The Robonaut project . 55 2.4.3 The COG project .
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Control of Legged Robots Pierre-Brice Wieber, Russ Tedrake, Scott Kuindersma
    Modeling and Control of Legged Robots Pierre-Brice Wieber, Russ Tedrake, Scott Kuindersma To cite this version: Pierre-Brice Wieber, Russ Tedrake, Scott Kuindersma. Modeling and Control of Legged Robots. Springer Handbook of Robotics, Springer International Publishing, pp.1203-1234, 2016, 10.1007/978- 3-319-32552-1_48. hal-02487855 HAL Id: hal-02487855 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02487855 Submitted on 21 Feb 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Chapter 48 Modeling and Control of Legged Robots Summary Introduction The promise of legged robots over standard wheeled robots is to provide im- proved mobility over rough terrain. This promise builds on the decoupling between the environment and the main body of the robot that the presence of articulated legs allows, with two consequences. First, the motion of the main body of the robot can be made largely independent from the roughness of the terrain, within the kinematic limits of the legs: legs provide an active suspen- sion system. Indeed, one of the most advanced hexapod robots of the 1980s was aptly called the Adaptive Suspension Vehicle [1]. Second, this decoupling al- lows legs to temporarily leave their contact with the ground: isolated footholds on a discontinuous terrain can be overcome, allowing to visit places absolutely out of reach otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Humanoid Robot Locomotion Capabilities in Virtual Disaster Response Scenarios Karim Bouyarmane, Joris Vaillant, François Keith, Abderrahmane Kheddar
    Exploring Humanoid Robot Locomotion Capabilities in Virtual Disaster Response Scenarios Karim Bouyarmane, Joris Vaillant, François Keith, Abderrahmane Kheddar To cite this version: Karim Bouyarmane, Joris Vaillant, François Keith, Abderrahmane Kheddar. Exploring Humanoid Robot Locomotion Capabilities in Virtual Disaster Response Scenarios. Humanoids, Nov 2012, Osaka, Japan. pp.337-342. lirmm-00765817 HAL Id: lirmm-00765817 https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/lirmm-00765817 Submitted on 16 Dec 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Exploring Humanoid Robots Locomotion Capabilities in Virtual Disaster Response Scenarios Karim Bouyarmane∗, Joris Vaillant†, Franc¸ois Keith† and Abderrahmane Kheddar† †CNRS-AIST Joint Robotics Laboratory (JRL), UMI3218/CRT, Tsukuba, Japan CNRS-UM2 Laboratoire d’Informatique de Robotique et de Microelectronique´ de Montpellier (LIRMM), France ∗ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Kyoto, Japan Abstract—We study the feasibility of having various hu- We thereby selected three benchmarking scenarios inspired manoid robots undertake some tasks from those challenged by the challenge: climbing an industrial ladder, getting into by the DARPA’s call on disaster operations. Hence, we focus a utility vehicle, crawling about in an unstructured envi- on locomotion tasks that apparently require human-like motor skills to be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralised Compliant Control for Hexapod Robots: a Stick Insect Based Walking Model
    Decentralised Compliant Control for Hexapod Robots: A Stick Insect Based Walking Model Hugo Leonardo Rosano-Matchain I V N E R U S E I T H Y T O H F G E R D I N B U Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Perception, Action and Behaviour School of Informatics University of Edinburgh 2007 Abstract This thesis aims to transfer knowledge from insect biology into a hexapod walking robot. The similarity of the robot model to the biological target allows the testing of hypotheses regarding control and behavioural strategies in the insect. Therefore, this thesis supports biorobotic research by demonstrating that robotic implementations are improved by using biological strategies and these models can be used to understand biological systems. Specifically, this thesis addresses two central problems in hexapod walking control: the single leg control mechanism and its control variables; and the different roles of the front, middle and hind legs that allow a decentralised architecture to co-ordinate complex behavioural tasks. To investigate these problems, behavioural studies on insect curve walking were combined with quantitative simulations. Behavioural experiments were designed to explore the control of turns of freely walking stick insects, Carausius morosus, toward a visual target. A program for insect tracking and kinematic analysis of observed motion was developed. The re- sults demonstrate that the front legs are responsible for most of the body trajectory. Nonetheless, to replicate insect walking behaviour it is necessary for all legs to con- tribute with specific roles. Additionally, statistics on leg stepping show that middle and hind legs continuously influence each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Robotics
    Introduction to Robotics Jan Faigl Department of Computer Science Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University in Prague Lecture 01 B4M36UIR – Artificial Intelligence in Robotics Jan Faigl, 2018 B4M36UIR – Lecture 01: Introduction to Robotics 1 / 52 Overview of the Lecture Part 1 – Course Organization Course Goals Means of Achieving the Course Goals Evaluation and Exam Part 2 – Introduction to Robotics Robots and Robotics Challenges in Robotics What is a Robot? Locomotion Jan Faigl, 2018 B4M36UIR – Lecture 01: Introduction to Robotics 2 / 52 Course Goals Means of Achieving the Course Goals Evaluation and Exam Part I Part 1 – Course Organization Jan Faigl, 2018 B4M36UIR – Lecture 01: Introduction to Robotics 3 / 52 Course Goals Means of Achieving the Course Goals Evaluation and Exam Outline Course Goals Means of Achieving the Course Goals Evaluation and Exam Jan Faigl, 2018 B4M36UIR – Lecture 01: Introduction to Robotics 4 / 52 Course Goals Means of Achieving the Course Goals Evaluation and Exam Course and Lecturers B4M36UIR – Artificial Intelligence in Robotics https://cw.fel.cvut.cz/wiki/courses/b4m36uir/ Department of Computer Science – http://cs.fel.cvut.cz Artificial Intelligence Center (AIC) – http://aic.fel.cvut.cz Lecturers doc. Ing. Jan Faigl, Ph.D. Center for Robotics and Autonomous Systems (CRAS) http://robotics.fel.cvut.cz Computational Robotics Laboratory (ComRob) http://comrob.fel.cvut.cz Mgr. Viliam Lisý, M.Sc., Ph.D. Game Theory (GT) research group Adversarial planning, Game Theory, Jan Faigl, 2018
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Reality Technologies for Novel Forms of Human-Robot Interaction
    Dissertation Mixed Reality Technologies for Novel Forms of Human-Robot Interaction Dissertation with the aim of achieving a doctoral degree at the Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences Dipl.-Inf. Dennis Krupke Human-Computer Interaction and Technical Aspects of Multimodal Systems Department of Informatics Universität Hamburg November 2019 Review Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Frank Steinicke Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Jianwei Zhang Drittgutachter: Prof. Dr. Eva Bittner Vorsitzende der Prüfungskomission: Prof. Dr. Simone Frintrop Datum der Disputation: 17.08.2020 “ My dear Miss Glory, Robots are not people. They are mechanically more perfect than we are, they have an astounding intellectual capacity, but they have no soul.” Karel Capek Abstract Nowadays, robot technology surrounds us and future developments will further increase the frequency of our everyday contacts with robots in our daily life. To enable this, the current forms of human-robot interaction need to evolve. The concept of digital twins seems promising for establishing novel forms of cooperation and communication with robots and for modeling system states. Machine learning is now ready to be applied to a multitude of domains. It has the potential to enhance artificial systems with capabilities, which so far are found in natural intelligent creatures, only. Mixed reality experienced a substantial technological evolution in recent years and future developments of mixed reality devices seem to be promising, as well. Wireless networks will improve significantly in the next years and thus, latency and bandwidth limitations will be no crucial issue anymore. Based on the ongoing technological progress, novel interaction and communication forms with robots become available and their application to real-world scenarios becomes feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • A Small 3D-Printed Six-Legged Walking Robot Designed for Desert Ant-Like
    Hexabot: a small 3D-printed six-legged walking robot designed for desert ant-like navigation tasks Julien Dupeyroux, Grégoire Passault, Franck Ruffier, Stéphane Viollet, Julien Serres To cite this version: Julien Dupeyroux, Grégoire Passault, Franck Ruffier, Stéphane Viollet, Julien Serres. Hexabot: a small 3D-printed six-legged walking robot designed for desert ant-like navigation tasks. IFAC Word Congress 2017, Jul 2017, Toulouse, France. hal-01643176 HAL Id: hal-01643176 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01643176 Submitted on 21 Nov 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Hexabot: a small 3D-printed six-legged walking robot designed for desert ant-like navigation tasks ? Julien Dupeyroux ∗ Gr´egoirePassault ∗∗ Franck Ruffier ∗ St´ephaneViollet ∗ Julien Serres ∗ ∗ Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, ISM, Inst Movement Sci, Marseille, France (e-mail: [email protected]). ∗∗ Rhoban Team, LaBRI, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: Over the last five decades, legged robots, and especially six-legged walking robots, have aroused great interest among the robotic community. Legged robots provide a higher level of mobility through their kinematic structure over wheeled robots, because legged robots can walk over uneven terrains without non-holonomic constraint.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Control of Legged Robots
    Chapter 48 Modeling and Control of Legged Robots Summary Introduction The promise of legged robots over standard wheeled robots is to provide im- proved mobility over rough terrain. This promise builds on the decoupling between the environment and the main body of the robot that the presence of articulated legs allows, with two consequences. First, the motion of the main body of the robot can be made largely independent from the roughness of the terrain, within the kinematic limits of the legs: legs provide an active suspen- sion system. Indeed, one of the most advanced hexapod robots of the 1980s was aptly called the Adaptive Suspension Vehicle [1]. Second, this decoupling al- lows legs to temporarily leave their contact with the ground: isolated footholds on a discontinuous terrain can be overcome, allowing to visit places absolutely out of reach otherwise. Note that having feet firmly planted on the ground is not mandatory here: skating is an equally interesting option, although rarely approached so far in robotics. Unfortunately, this promise comes at the cost of a hindering increase in complexity. It is only with the unveiling of the Honda P2 humanoid robot in 1996 [2], and later of the Boston Dynamics BigDog quadruped robot in 2005 that legged robots finally began to deliver real-life capabilities that are just beginning to match the long sought animal-like mobility over rough terrain. Not matching yet the capabilities of humans and animals, legged robots do contribute however already to understanding their locomotion, as evidenced by the many fruitful collaborations between robotics and biomechanics researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Index
    Subject Index Abduction, 335, 336, 346, 377 Amputation Acceleration above-knee, 278 linear, 61, 118, 213 below-elbow, 357 Acceptors Amputee, 278, 279, 281, 282, 356–358, 363 finite-state, 417 Anthropomorphic appearance, 442 Action potentials, 141 Anthropopathic robots, 442 Action selection, 115, 137, 168 Aquatom, 222 Activation function, 143, 145, 147–149 Arbitration, priority-based, 106 ActivMedia Robotics, 4, 15, 65, 187, 343 Architectures Actuators, 10, 47 3T, 109 cybernetic, 323 ALLIANCE, 407 electromagnetic, 48, 56 application programming layer, 121 hydraulic, 55 AuRA, 109, 404 nonlinear, 47 behavior-based, 3, 8, 10, 21, 97, 104, 107, 134, pneumatic, 48, 55, 330 409, 488 prismatic, 228 BERRA, 109, 110 series elastic, 270 cognitive, 110, 113, 114, 168, 170, 173, 447 Adaptive Suspension Machine, 289, 290, 303 control, 3, 7, 10, 33, 118, 384, 413 adaptive cord mechanism, 204 deliberative, 8, 100 adaptivity, 31, 279 hierarchical-deliberative planning, 108 Adduction, 335, 336, 346, 377 hybrid deliberative reactive, 107, 109 Adept Technology, 4 layered, 105, 121 Adonis, 178 MissionLab, 404 Aerosonde, 233, 234 multiple robot, 10, 402 AeroVironment, 234, 236, 244, 245 open, 8, 121 AFSMs. See Augmented finite-state machines pheromone, 411 Aggregation, 403 Ranger-Scout, 412 AIBO, 5, 22, 62, 121, 318, 319, 429, 430, 452, reactive, 104 510 sense-think-act, 102 Aircraft software, 13, 97, 99, 457, 509 semiautonomous, 232 subsumption, 3, 106–108, 294, 295 tilt-rotor, 232 supervisory layer, 108 Algorithms three-level, 13, 14 control and mapping, 489
    [Show full text]