DOCSLIB.ORG

3.4.7. Annexure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3.4.7. Annexure 1 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS MENT FOR GAS PIPELINE DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA 1 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR GAS PIPELINE DEVELOPMENT 2 3 Draft v3 Specialist Assessment Report for Stakeholder Review 4 5 FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS 6 Contributing Authors Gary de Winnaar1, Dr Vere Ross-Gillespie1 7 8 1 GroundTruth, Hilton 9 10 11 WETLANDS AND RIVERS SPECIALIST REPORT Page 1 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS MENT FOR GAS PIPELINE DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA 1 2 3 4 5 6 TABLES 4 7 FIGURES 4 8 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 7 9 10 1 SUMMARY 8 11 2 INTRODUCTION 9 12 3 SCOPE OF THIS STRATEGIC ISSUE 11 13 4 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 13 14 4.1 STUDY METHODOLOGY 13 15 4.1.1 Briefing session 13 16 4.1.2 Literature review and data collation 14 17 4.1.3 Assigning a suitable spatial scale for analysis 14 18 4.1.4 Analysis and integration of GIS data 14 19 4.1.5 Application of metrics for sensitivity analyses 14 20 4.1.5.1 River threat status and sensitivity: 14 21 4.1.5.2 Wetlands threat status and sensitivity: 15 22 4.1.5.3 Freshwater biota (species and families): 16 23 4.1.5.4 Freshwater plants (Kingdom: Plantae): 16 24 4.1.6 Integration of taxonomic groups 18 25 4.1.7 Producing integrated four tier sensitivity maps 18 26 4.2 DATA SOURCES 19 27 4.3 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS 23 28 4.4 RELEVANT REGULATORY INSTRUMENTS 24 29 5 BASELINE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED GAS PIPELINE CORRIDORS 31 30 6 SENSITIVITY MAPPING 47 31 6.1 IDENTIFICATION SENSITIVITY CRITERIA FOR FEATURES 47 32 6.2 PHASE 1 CORRIDOR 50 33 6.2.1 Rivers 50 34 6.2.2 Wetlands 51 35 6.2.3 Freshwater biota (fauna and flora) 52 36 6.2.4 Freshwater ecosystems and biota (combined) 53 37 6.3 PHASE 2 CORRIDOR 54 38 6.3.1 Rivers 54 39 6.3.2 Wetlands 55 40 6.3.3 Freshwater biota (fauna and flora) 56 41 6.3.4 Freshwater ecosystems and biota (combined) 57 42 6.4 PHASE 3 CORRIDOR 58 43 6.4.1 Rivers 58 44 6.4.2 Wetlands 59 45 6.4.3 Freshwater biota (fauna and flora) 60 WETLANDS AND RIVERS SPECIALIST REPORT Page 2 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS MENT FOR GAS PIPELINE DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA 1 6.4.4 Freshwater ecosystems and biota (combined) 61 2 6.5 PHASE 4 CORRIDOR 62 3 6.5.1 Rivers 62 4 6.5.2 Wetlands 63 5 6.5.3 Freshwater biota (fauna and flora) 64 6 6.5.4 Freshwater ecosystems and biota (combined) 65 7 6.6 PHASE 5 CORRIDOR 66 8 6.6.1 Rivers 66 9 6.6.2 Wetlands 67 10 6.6.3 Freshwater biota (fauna and flora) 68 11 6.6.4 Freshwater ecosystems and biota (combined) 69 12 6.7 PHASE 6 CORRIDOR 70 13 6.7.1 Rivers 70 14 6.7.2 Wetlands 71 15 6.7.3 Freshwater biota (fauna and flora) 72 16 6.7.4 Freshwater ecosystems and biota (combined) 73 17 6.8 PHASE 7 CORRIDOR 74 18 6.8.1 Rivers 74 19 6.8.2 Wetlands 75 20 6.8.3 Freshwater biota (fauna and flora) 76 21 6.8.4 Freshwater ecosystems and biota (combined) 77 22 6.9 PHASE 8 CORRIDOR 78 23 6.9.1 Rivers 78 24 6.9.2 Wetlands 79 25 6.9.3 Freshwater biota (fauna and flora) 80 26 6.9.4 Freshwater ecosystems and biota (combined) 81 27 6.10 INLAND CORRIDOR 82 28 6.10.1 Rivers 82 29 6.10.2 Wetlands 83 30 6.10.3 Freshwater biota (fauna and flora) 84 31 6.10.4 Freshwater ecosystems and biota (combined) 85 32 7 KEY POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION 86 33 8 RISK ASSESSMENT 94 34 9 BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 98 35 9.1 PLANNING PHASE 98 36 9.2 CONSTRUCTION PHASE 98 37 9.3 OPERATIONS PHASE 98 38 9.4 REHABILITATION AND POST CLOSURE 99 39 9.5 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 99 40 10 GAPS IN KNOWLEDGE 100 41 11 CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS 100 42 12 REFERENCES 102 43 44 WETLANDS AND RIVERS SPECIALIST REPORT Page 3 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS MENT FOR GAS PIPELINE DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA 1 Appendix 1: Selected flora used in the assessment of freshwater biota 105 2 Appendix 2: Selected fauna according the taxonomic groups used in the assessment of freshwater biota 108 3 4 TABLES 5 Table 1: Criteria for assigning sensitivity classes for wetland attributes. 15 6 Table 2: Data used in this assessment. 19 7 Table 3: Assumptions and limitations. 23 8 Table 4: International, national and provincial regulatory instruments relevant to freshwater ecosystems. 24 9 Table 5: Description of freshwater ecosystems and species of the proposed Gas Pipeline corridors, including 10 existing drivers and pressures. 31 11 Table 6: Data and criteria used to assign sensitivity to freshwater ecosystems within the proposed Gas Pipeline 12 corridors. 47 13 Table 7: Sensitivity ratings assigned to freshwater ecosystem features in all of the proposed Gas Pipeline 14 corridors. 49 15 Table 8: Key potential impacts to freshwater ecosystems and associated fauna and flora by gas pipeline 16 development, and their mitigation. 89 17 Table 9: Assessment of risk associated with impacts to freshwater ecosystems resulting from gas pipeline 18 development with respect to the four-tiered sensitivity classes for freshwater attributes. 95 19 20 FIGURES 21 Figure 1: Overview of the proposed gas pipeline corridors 11 22 Figure 2: Flow (perennial and non-perennial) and threat status of rivers that flow through the gas pipeline 23 corridors developed using the PES, EI and ES data from DWS (2014). 43 24 Figure 3: Wetland threat status based on the national wetland vegetation group regions of Nel and Driver (2012) 25 applied to all wetlands of the collated wetland coverage developed for the gas pipeline corridors 44 26 Figure 4: Point localities and corresponding threat status of freshwater plants based on known occurrence data 27 within the gas pipeline corridors 45 28 Figure 5: Point localities and corresponding threat status of freshwater fauna based on known occurrence data 29 within the gas pipeline corridors 46 30 Figure 6: River threat status and sensitivity calculated for sub-quaternary catchments in the gas pipeline phase 1 31 corridor using PES, EI and ES data from DWS (2014). 50 32 Figure 7: Wetland threat status and sensitivity calculated in relation to areas of sub-quaternary catchments in the 33 gas pipeline phase 1 corridor. 51 34 Figure 8: Threat and sensitivity status calculated for different freshwater taxonomic groups (flora and fauna) in 35 the gas pipeline phase 1 corridor in relation to sub-quaternary catchments. 52 36 Figure 9: Integrated sensitivity and threat status map for freshwater ecosystems and biota in the gas pipeline 37 phase 1 corridor. 53 38 Figure 10: River threat status and sensitivity calculated for sub-quaternary catchments in the gas pipeline phase 39 2 corridor using PES, EI and ES data from DWS (2014). 54 40 Figure 11: Wetland threat status and sensitivity calculated in relation to areas of sub-quaternary catchments in 41 the gas pipeline phase 2 corridor. 55 42 Figure 12: Threat and sensitivity status calculated for different freshwater taxonomic groups (flora and fauna) in 43 the gas pipeline phase 2 corridor in relation to sub-quaternary catchments 56 44 Figure 13: Integrated sensitivity and threat status map for freshwater ecosystems and biota in the gas pipeline 45 phase 2 corridor. 57 46 Figure 14: River threat status and sensitivity calculated for sub-quaternary catchments in the gas pipeline phase 47 3 corridor using PES, EI and ES data from DWS (2014). 58 WETLANDS AND RIVERS SPECIALIST REPORT Page 4 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS MENT FOR GAS PIPELINE DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA 1 Figure 15: Wetland threat status and sensitivity calculated in relation to areas of sub-quaternary catchments in 2 the gas pipeline phase 3 corridor. 59 3 Figure 16: Threat and sensitivity status calculated for different freshwater taxonomic groups (flora and fauna) in 4 the gas pipeline phase 3 corridor in relation to sub-quaternary catchments 60 5 Figure 17: Integrated sensitivity and threat status map for freshwater ecosystems and biota in the gas pipeline 6 phase 3 corridor. 61 7 Figure 18: River threat status and sensitivity calculated for sub-quaternary catchments in the gas pipeline phase 8 4 corridor using PES, EI and ES data from DWS (2014). 62 9 Figure 19: Wetland threat status and sensitivity calculated in relation to areas of sub-quaternary catchments in 10 the gas pipeline phase 4 corridor. 63 11 Figure 20: Threat and sensitivity status calculated for different freshwater taxonomic groups (flora and fauna) in 12 the gas pipeline phase 4 corridor in relation to sub-quaternary catchments 64 13 Figure 21: Integrated sensitivity and threat status map for freshwater ecosystems and biota in the gas pipeline 14 phase 4 corridor. 65 15 Figure 22: River threat status and sensitivity calculated for sub-quaternary catchments in the gas pipeline phase 16 5 corridor using PES, EI and ES data from DWS (2014). 66 17 Figure 23: Wetland threat status and sensitivity calculated in relation to areas of sub-quaternary catchments in 18 the gas pipeline phase 5 corridor. 67 19 Figure 24: Threat and sensitivity status calculated for different freshwater taxonomic groups (flora and fauna) in 20 the gas pipeline phase 5 corridor in relation to sub-quaternary catchments 68 21 Figure 25: Integrated sensitivity and threat status map for freshwater ecosystems and biota in the gas pipeline 22 phase 5 corridor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • African Herp News
    African Herp News Newsletter of the Herpetological Association of Africa Number 59 APRIL 2013 HERPETOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICA http://www. wits.ac.za/haa FOUNDED 1965 The HAA is dedicated to the study and conservation of African reptiles and amphibians. Membership is open to anyone with an interest in the African herpetofauna. Members receive the Association’s journal, African Journal of Herpetology (which publishes review papers, research articles, and short communications – subject to peer review) and African Herp News, the Newsletter (which includes short communications, natural history notes, geographical distribution notes, herpetological survey reports, venom and snakebite notes, book reviews, bibliographies, husbandry hints, announcements and news items). NEWSLETTER EDITOR’S NOTE Articles shall be considered for publication provided that they are original and have not been published elsewhere. Articles will be submitted for peer review at the Editor’s discretion. Authors are requested to submit manuscripts by e-mail in MS Word ‘.doc’ or ‘.docx’ format. COPYRIGHT: Articles published in the Newsletter are copyright of the Herpetological Association of Africa and may not be reproduced without permission of the Editor. The views and opinions expressed in articles are not necessarily those of the Editor. COMMITTEE OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICA CHAIRMAN Aaron Bauer, Department of Biology, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, USA. [email protected] SECRETARY Jeanne Tarrant, African Amphibian Conservation Research Group, NWU. 40A Hilltop Road, Hillcrest 3610, South Africa. [email protected] TREASURER Abeda Dawood, National Zoological Gardens, Corner of Boom and Paul Kruger Streets, Pretoria 0002, South Africa. [email protected] JOURNAL EDITOR John Measey, Applied Biodiversity Research, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, South African Biodiversity Institute, P/Bag X7, Claremont 7735, South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Water Temperature on Aquatic Organisms: a Review of Knowledge and Methods for Assessing Biotic Responses to Temperature
    The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms: a review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature Report to the Water Research Commission by Helen Dallas The Freshwater Consulting Group Freshwater Research Unit Department of Zoology University of Cape Town WRC Report No. KV 213/09 30 28 26 24 22 C) o 20 18 16 14 Temperature ( 12 10 8 6 4 Jul '92 Jul Oct '91 Apr '92 Jun '92 Jan '93 Mar '92 Feb '92 Feb '93 Aug '91 Nov '91 Nov '91 Dec Aug '92 Sep '92 '92 Nov '92 Dec May '92 Sept '91 Month and Year i Obtainable from Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 GEZINA, 0031 [email protected] The publication of this report emanates from a project entitled: The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms: A review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature (WRC project no K8/690). DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use ISBN978-1-77005-731-9 Printed in the Republic of South Africa ii Preface This report comprises five deliverables for the one-year consultancy project to the Water Research Commission, entitled “The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms – a review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature” (K8-690). Deliverable 1 (Chapter 1) is a literature review aimed at consolidating available information pertaining to water temperature in aquatic ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Ecology and Conservation of Frogs in Urban Habitats of South Africa
    Frogs about town: Aspects of the ecology and conservation of frogs in urban habitats of South Africa DJD Kruger 20428405 Thesis submitted for the degree Philosophiae Doctor in Zoology at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University Supervisor: Prof LH du Preez Co-supervisor: Prof C Weldon September 2014 i In loving memory of my grandmother, Kitty Lombaard (1934/07/09 – 2012/05/18), who has made an invaluable difference in all aspects of my life. ii Acknowledgements A project with a time scale and magnitude this large leaves one indebted by numerous people that contributed to the end result of this study. I would like to thank the following people for their invaluable contributions over the past three years, in no particular order: To my supervisor, Prof. Louis du Preez I am indebted, not only for the help, guidance and support he has provided throughout this study, but also for his mentorship and example he set in all aspects of life. I also appreciate the help of my co-supervisor, Prof. Ché Weldon, for the numerous contributions, constructive comments and hours spent on proofreading. I owe thanks to all contributors for proofreading and language editing and thereby correcting my “boerseun” English grammar but also providing me with professional guidance. Prof. Louis du Preez, Prof. Ché Weldon, Dr. Andrew Hamer, Dr. Kirsten Parris, Prof. John Malone and Dr. Jeanne Tarrant are all dearly thanked for invaluable comments on earlier drafts of parts/the entirety of this thesis. For statistical contributions I am especially also grateful to Dr. Andrew Hamer for help with Bayesian analysis and to the North-West Statistical Services consultant, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • (Pyxicephalidae: Nothophryne) for Northern Mozambique Inselbergs
    African Journal of Herpetology ISSN: 2156-4574 (Print) 2153-3660 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ther20 New species of Mongrel Frogs (Pyxicephalidae: Nothophryne) for northern Mozambique inselbergs Werner Conradie, Gabriela B. Bittencourt-Silva, Harith M. Farooq, Simon P. Loader, Michele Menegon & Krystal A. Tolley To cite this article: Werner Conradie, Gabriela B. Bittencourt-Silva, Harith M. Farooq, Simon P. Loader, Michele Menegon & Krystal A. Tolley (2018): New species of Mongrel Frogs (Pyxicephalidae: Nothophryne) for northern Mozambique inselbergs, African Journal of Herpetology, DOI: 10.1080/21564574.2017.1376714 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/21564574.2017.1376714 View supplementary material Published online: 22 Feb 2018. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ther20 AFRICAN JOURNAL OF HERPETOLOGY, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/21564574.2017.1376714 New species of Mongrel Frogs (Pyxicephalidae: Nothophryne) for northern Mozambique inselbergs Werner Conradie a,b, Gabriela B. Bittencourt-Silva c, Harith M. Farooq d,e,f, Simon P. Loader g, Michele Menegon h and Krystal A. Tolley i,j aPort Elizabeth Museum (Bayworld), Marine Drive, Humewood 6013, South Africa; bSchool of Natural Resource Management, George Campus, Nelson Mandela University, George 6530, South Africa; cDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Basel
    [Show full text]
  • Using Action Cameras to Estimate the Abundance and Habitat Use of Threatened Fish in Clear Headwater Streams
    African Journal of Aquatic Science ISSN: 1608-5914 (Print) 1727-9364 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/taas20 Using action cameras to estimate the abundance and habitat use of threatened fish in clear headwater streams B Hannweg, SM Marr, LE Bloy & OLF Weyl To cite this article: B Hannweg, SM Marr, LE Bloy & OLF Weyl (2020): Using action cameras to estimate the abundance and habitat use of threatened fish in clear headwater streams, African Journal of Aquatic Science, DOI: 10.2989/16085914.2019.1701404 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2019.1701404 View supplementary material Published online: 12 May 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 6 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=taas20 African Journal of Aquatic Science 2020, 45(1): xxx–xxx Copyright © NISC (Pty) Ltd Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AQUATIC SCIENCE This is the final version of the article that is published ISSN 1608-5914 EISSN 1727-9364 ahead of the print and online issue https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2019.1701404 Short Note Using action cameras to estimate the abundance and habitat use of threatened fish in clear headwater streams B Hannweg1,2, SM Marr2,3* , LE Bloy1,2,3 and OLF Weyl1,2,3 1 Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa 2 DSI/NRF Research Chair in Inland Fisheries and Freshwater Ecology, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown, South Africa 3 Centre for Invasion Biology, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown, South Africa *Correspondence: [email protected] Snorkel and electrofishing surveys are the traditional baseline methods for fish surveys in clear headwater streams.
    [Show full text]
  • R Conradie Orcid.Org 0000-0002-8653-4702
    Influence of the invasive fish, Gambusia affinis, on amphibians in the Western Cape R Conradie orcid.org 0000-0002-8653-4702 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Zoology at the North-West University Supervisor: Prof LH du Preez Co-supervisor: Prof AE Channing Graduation May 2018 23927399 “The whole land is made desolate, but no man lays it to heart.” JEREMIAH 12:11 i DECLARATION I, Roxanne Conradie, declare that this dissertation is my own, unaided work, except where otherwise acknowledged. It is being submitted for the degree of M.Sc. to the North-West University, Potchefstroom. It has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university. ____________________ (Roxanne Conradie) ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to the following persons and organisations, without whose assistance this study would not have been possible: My supervisor Prof. Louis du Preez and co-supervisor Prof. Alan Channing, for guidance, advice, support, and encouragement throughout the duration of this study. Prof Louis, your passion for the biological sciences has been an inspiration to me since undergraduate Zoology classes five years ago. Prof Alan, you were a vital pillar of support for me in the Cape and I am incredibly grateful towards you. Thank you both for all the time and effort you have put into helping me with my work, for all your honest and detailed advice, as well as practical help. It is truly a privilege to have had such outstanding biologists as my mentors. My husband Louis Conradie, for offering up so many weekends in order to help me with fieldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Common and Scientific Names for Fish and Wildlife Species Found in Idaho
    APPENDIX A: COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SPECIES FOUND IN IDAHO. How to Read the Lists. Within these lists, species are listed phylogenetically by class. In cases where phylogeny is incompletely understood, taxonomic units are arranged alphabetically. Listed below are definitions for interpreting NatureServe conservation status ranks (GRanks and SRanks). These ranks reflect an assessment of the condition of the species rangewide (GRank) and statewide (SRank). Rangewide ranks are assigned by NatureServe and statewide ranks are assigned by the Idaho Conservation Data Center. GX or SX Presumed extinct or extirpated: not located despite intensive searches and virtually no likelihood of rediscovery. GH or SH Possibly extinct or extirpated (historical): historically occurred, but may be rediscovered. Its presence may not have been verified in the past 20–40 years. A species could become SH without such a 20–40 year delay if the only known occurrences in the state were destroyed or if it had been extensively and unsuccessfully looked for. The SH rank is reserved for species for which some effort has been made to relocate occurrences, rather than simply using this status for all elements not known from verified extant occurrences. G1 or S1 Critically imperiled: at high risk because of extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer occurrences), rapidly declining numbers, or other factors that make it particularly vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation. G2 or S2 Imperiled: at risk because of restricted range, few populations (often 20 or fewer), rapidly declining numbers, or other factors that make it vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation. G3 or S3 Vulnerable: at moderate risk because of restricted range, relatively few populations (often 80 or fewer), recent and widespread declines, or other factors that make it vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Spatially Explicit Call Data of Anhydrophryne Ngongoniensis to Guide Conservation Actions
    Using spatially explicit call data of Anhydrophryne ngongoniensis to guide conservation actions M Trenor orcid.org/0000-0002-0682-2262 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Masters degree in Zoology at the North-West University Supervisor: Prof C Weldon Co-supervisor: Dr J Tarrant Graduation May 2018 25747339 Abstract It’s been barely 25 years since the Mistbelt Chirping Frog (Anhydrophryne ngongoniensis) was discovered. This secretive amphibian occurs only in the so-called mistbelt grasslands and montane forest patches of south-central KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa and is restricted to an area of occupancy of just 12 square kilometers. This species’ habitat is severely fragmented due to afforestation and agriculture and only two of the remaining populations are formally protected. The species occurs mostly on fragmented grassland patches on forestry land, and any conservation strategies should include the management practices for the landowners. Updated density estimates and insight into habitat utilization are needed to proceed with conservation strategy for the species. Like many other frogs, this species is cryptic in its behaviour, making mark-recapture surveys prohibitively challenging. Audio transects have been used previously, but are dependent on surveyor’s’ experience, hindering standardization. Using automated recorders, in a spatially explicit array with GPS synchronization, one can confidently estimate the density of calling males and reveal the estimated locations of calling males, thus providing insight into their occupancy. We surveyed nine historic sites and detected the species at five of the sites in either isolated grassland patches or indigenous Afromontane forest. We successfully employed the spatially explicit catch recapture (SECR) method at three of the sites using Wildlife Acoustics™ Song Meters with extended microphones in an array.
    [Show full text]
  • Jlb Smith Institute of Ichthyology
    ISSN 0075-2088 J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY GRAHAMSTOWN, SOUTH AFRICA SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 56 SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAMES OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FRESHWATER FISHES by Paul H. Skelton November 1993 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS o f THE J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY The Institute publishes original research on the systematics, zoogeography, ecology, biology and conservation of fishes. Manuscripts on ancillary subjects (aquaculture, fishery biology, historical ichthyology and archaeology pertaining to fishes) will be considered subject to the availability of publication funds. Two series are produced at irregular intervals: the Special Publication series and the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Acceptance of manuscripts for publication is subject to the approval of reviewers from outside the Institute. Priority is given to papers by staff of the Institute, but manuscripts from outside the Institute will be considered if they are pertinent to the work of the Institute. Colour illustrations can be printed at the expense of the author. Publications of the Institute are available by subscription or in exchange for publi­ cations of other institutions. Lists of the Institute’s publications are available from the Publications Secretary at the address below. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts shorter than 30 pages will generally be published in the Special Publications series; longer papers will be considered for the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Please follow the layout and format of a recent Bulletin or Special Publication. Manuscripts must be submitted in duplicate to the Editor, J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Private Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa. The typescript must be double-spaced throughout with 25 mm margins all round.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Barbus Species (Cyprinidae) of Southern Africa
    Parasites of Barbus species (Cyprinidae) of southern Africa By Pieter Johannes Swanepoel Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State. Supervisor: Prof J.G. van As Co-supervisor: Prof L.L. van As Co-supervisor: Dr K.W. Christison July 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 CYPRINIDAE .......................................................................................................... 6 BARBUS ............................................................................................................... 10 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 12 2. Study Sites ................................................................................................ 16 OKAVANGO RIVER SYSTEM .............................................................................. 17 Importance ................................................................................................................... 17 Hydrology .................................................................................................................... 17 Habitat and Vegetation ................................................................................................ 19 Leseding Research Camp...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]