Competition Review in the Telecommunications Business Field of FY 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Competition Review in the Telecommunications Business Field of FY 2009 Annex Competition Review in the Telecommunications Business Field of FY 2009 January 2010 Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Table of Contents Summary of Assessment Results [Part 1] Fixed Point Assessments I. Fixed Telephone Domain Chapter 1 Market Delimitation within Fixed Telephone Domain Chapter 2 Analysis of Major Indices in Fixed Telephone Domain II Mobile Communications Domain Chapter 1 Market Delimitation within Mobile Communications Domain Chapter 2 Analysis of Major Indices in Mobile Communications Domain III Internet Connection Domain Chapter 1 Market Delimitation within the Internet Connection Domain Chapter 2 Analysis of Major Indices in Broadband Market Chapter 3 Analysis of Major Indices in ADSL Sub-Market Chapter 4 Analysis of Major Indices in FTTH Sub-Market Chapter 5 Analysis of Major Indices in Cable Internet Sub-Market Chapter 6 Analysis of Major Indices in ISP Market IV Corporate Network Services Domain Chapter 1 Market Delimitation within Corporate Network Services Domain Chapter 2 Trends with Use of Corporate Network Services Chapter 3 Analysis of Major Indices in WAN Services Market Chapter 4 Analysis of Major Indices in Leased Circuit Services Market [Part 2] Strategic Assessments V. Sequential Analysis of Changes in Consumer Preferences with Telecommunications Services Chapter 1 Purpose of Assessment Chapter 2 Results of Analysis Chapter 3 Conclusion VI. Quantitative Analysis of Economic Impact of Past Competition Policies concerning Dissemination of Mobile and Broadband Services Chapter 1 Purpose of Assessment Chapter 2 Subjects and Methods of Analysis Chapter 3 Analysis of Mobile and Broadband Markets Chapter 4 Matters of Concern Summary of Assessment Results “Competition Review in the Telecommunications Business Field of FY 2009” Summary of Assessment Results and Future Prospects 1. Purpose and Significance The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications commenced upon a “Competition Review in the Telecommunications Business Field” (hereinafter referred to as the “Competition Review”) in FY 2003 in assessing/analysing the status with competition in the communications market and for reflection in policy developments. In the Competition Review information was collected from both the demand side and the supply side with consideration given to the “Basic Policies” that include medium-term assessment principles and “Implementation Details”, a “market delimitation” implemented in determining the scope of the markets to be included as subjects of an assessment based on that information, and then the status with competition in the market analyzed in preparing assessment results on those markets, including identifying any business operators with market dominance, etc. In addition, four domains were selected as subjects of a “fixed point assessment”, namely “Fixed telephones”, “mobile communications”, “internet connections”, and “corporate network services”, in an annual fixed point observation that has taken place since FY 2006, with a “strategic assessment” that will be newly created in analysis with attention paid to themes of great political need or concern. The “Competition Review in the Telecommunications Business Field of FY 2009” (hereinafter referred to as the “Competition Review 2009”) featured “quantitative analysis of the economic impact of past competition policies concerning the dissemination of mobile and broadband services” and “sequential analysis of changes in consumer preferences with telecommunications services” as strategic assessments in view of summarizing the efforts of the Competition Review made to date and reflecting them in strategic assessments to be made next fiscal year after taking into consideration that six years has passed since a Competition Review was conducted and that the major themes had already been addressed and a certain amount of data collected, etc. 2. Points of the Report Chapter I through Chapter IV of this report concerns fixed point observation analysis on the subjects of fixed point assessments, namely fixed telephones, mobile communications, internet connections, and corporate network services, and an assessment of market dominance that was conducted in revealing the status with competition in the respective markets. Chapter V through VI summarizes the strategic assessments. The results of the fixed point assessments and strategic assessment of Competition Review 2009 are summarized below. 1 2.1. Points of Fixed Point Assessments (1) Market concentration and share Figure 1 shows the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) 1 that indicates the market concentration and share of the NTT Group in major markets within the four domains which are the subjects of the fixed point assessments. The national level HHI was calculated by adding up the shares of the multiple business operators when necessary, including regarding NTT East and West as one company. [Figure 1 Market concentration and share of NTT Group in major markets within four domains subject to fixed point assessment] Review results of FY 2009 Major delimited markets Domain Market concentration (including sub-markets) Share of NTT Group (HHI) Fixed telephones (NTT subscriber telephones, direct access telephones, CATV 6,951 ↓ 82.9% ↓ telephones, 0ABJ-IP telephones) Fixed telephones Local 2,433 ↓ Local 75.3% → In-prefecture In-prefecture 2,301 ↓ 73.5% → Relay telephones long distance long distance Out-of-prefecture 3,574 ↓ Out-of-prefecture 72.5% → International 2,870 ↓ International 66.4% ↑ 050-IP telephones 3,168 → 35.1% ↑ Mobile Mobile phones/PHS 3,461 → 48.2% → communications Broadband 3,048 ↑ 52.7% ↑ ADSL 3,263 ↑ 34.8% → Internet FTTH 5,836 ↑ 74.4% → connections Cable internet 1,483 ↑ -- ISP 1,557 → 31.9% → Corporate WAN services 2,173 → 67.5% ↓ network services Leased circuit services 8,354 → 94.6% → (Note 1) In calculating the “market concentration (HHI)” at the national level NTT East and West were regarded as one company while other companies of the NTT Group were regarded as different companies (SoftBank Group, J:COM Group, JCN Group, and electrical power-related business operators of broadband/ISP, J:COM Group and JCN Group with CATV internet, and electrical power-related business operators of FTTH were regarded as one company, respectively). With the “share of NTT Group” the share of 050-IP telephones is that of NTT Communications while the share of ADSL/FTTH is that of NTT East and West. The figures for fixed telephones, mobile communications, internet connections, and WAN services are as of March 2010 and the figures for leased circuit services as of March 2009. 1 HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index) is an index used to measure market dominance that is calculated by adding the square of the share of each business operator in the market. HHI totals the squares of each individual market share, and hence changes in the share of business operators with large shares have a greater impact. Conversely the impact of changes in the share of business operators with a small share is limited. A characteristic of HHI is that a lack of information on small-scale business operators does not significantly affect the effectiveness of the index. 2 (Note 2) The arrows (↓, ↑, →) in the table indicate ups and downs from the “Competition Review 2008” by100 or more for HHI and 1 point or more for the share. HHI values vary from 0 (perfect competition) to 10,000 (perfect dominance), with values close to 10,000 indicating a higher market concentration. With evaluations made using the index an HHI of less than 1,000 is deemed acceptable for mergers by the EU Directorate General for Competition. In addition, the US Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission set the standard of regarding a post-merger HHI of [1] less than 1,000 as no concentration, [2] between 1,000 to 1,800 as a medium concentration, and [3] over 1,800 a high concentration. However, the “Guidelines on Application of the Antimonopoly Act Concerning Review of Business Combinations” (revised in January 2010) published by the Japan Fair Trade Commission provides for post-merger shares being less than 10% or an HHI of 2,500 or less (and a share of 25% or less) as “usually not considered substantial enough to restrain competition” and an HHI of 2,500 (and a market share of 35% or less) as “the possibility of being a restraint to competition is usually considered low”2. An HHI or market share of no more than a certain level merely indicates the possibility of a restraint on competition being low and that of a certain level or higher does not necessarily mean it is a restraint to competition. It should be determined on a case-by-case basis with consideration also given to the advantage of scale, etc. Using these values as reference reveals the majority of the communications market to be oligopolistic. With the fixed telephone, 050-IP telephone, mobile communication, ADSL, FTTH, and leased circuit service markets the HHI exceeds 3,000 and the concentration considered extremely high. The FTTH market growing and at the same time the concentration being on an upward trend is particularly characteristic. The share of the NTT Group exceeds 50% in every market, excluding 050-IP telephones3, mobile communications, ADSL, and ISP. In addition, the share of the NTT Group tends to be high in many of the markets with a high market concentration. (2) Existence and exercising of market dominance Figure 2 shows the results of assessing market dominance from two points of view, the existence of market dominance and the exercising of market dominance in major
Recommended publications
  • BROADBAND PROPERTIES | | July 2008 That Handles Mainly Carrier Ethernet Has Home Architecture for Verizon’S Fios
    Broadband 2 0TOP Properties 0 www.bbpmag.com 8100 This year’s listing shows new emphasis on companies that sell equipment and software for network monitoring, provisioning, and customer service. A BBP Staff Report his year’s Top 100 continues a tive business plans and technology Prysmian – a major fiber and copper ca- trend from last year, with growth configurations. ble vendor worldwide (it was spun out of Tin the number of awardees on the • Helping others deploy networks, by Pirelli) was expanding its fiber business network management side of the busi- supplying key hardware, software, here, selling such products as its blown ness. Most exciting: billing and network design services, construction services fiber and massive fiber ribbon cables. monitoring software that can seamlessly and so forth. But it had been making a bigger FTTx handle the triple play and a whole lot • Introducing innovative technolo- impact in the US only since 2006. It more. This year’s listing also rewards gies, even if the technologies have didn’t make the Top 100 last year, but suppliers of fiber and systems for both not been commercially deployed at was an easy call this time. inside and outside plant – a new class of the time the list is compiled. We’re Corporate form and overall organi- equipment made possible by bend-tol- always on the lookout for technolo- zational size are not important. Non- erant fiber – and developers of entirely gies that change the rules – by re- profit entities such as municipal fiber new PON technologies. ducing early deployment costs, for network operators are eligible.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Corporate Philosophy Information Revolution – Happiness for everyone Vision The corporate group needed most by people around the world SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 001 A History of Challenges A History of Challenges The view is different when you challenge yourself Continuing to take on new challenges and embrace change without fear. Driving business forward through exhaustive debate. This is the SoftBank Group’s DNA. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 002 A History of Challenges Established SoftBank Japan. 1981 Commenced operations as a distributor of packaged software. 1982 Entered the publishing business. Launched Oh! PC and Oh! MZ, monthly magazines introducing PCs and software by manufacturer. 1994 Acquired events division from Ziff Communications Company of the U.S. through SoftBank Holdings Inc. 1996 Acquired Ziff-Davis Publishing Company, U.S. publisher of PC WEEK magazine and provider of leading-edge information on the PC industry. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 003 A History of Challenges Established Yahoo Japan through joint investment with Yahoo! Inc. in the U.S. 1996 Began to develop into an Internet company at full scale. Yahoo Japan Net income* 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FY (Note) Accounting standard: JGAAP up to fiscal 2012; IFRSs from fiscal 2013 onward. * Net income attributable to owners of the parent. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 004 A History of Challenges Made full-scale entry into the telecommunications business. 2000s Contributed to faster, more affordable telecommunications services in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunications Provider Locator
    Telecommunications Provider Locator Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau March 2009 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by contacting Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail at [email protected]. This report can be downloaded and interactively searched on the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site located at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/locator.html. Telecommunications Provider Locator This report lists the contact information, primary telecommunications business and service(s) offered by 6,252 telecommunications providers. The last report was released September 7, 2007.1 The information in this report is drawn from providers’ Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets (FCC Form 499-A). It can be used by customers to identify and locate telecommunications providers, by telecommunications providers to identify and locate others in the industry, and by equipment vendors to identify potential customers. Virtually all providers of telecommunications must file FCC Form 499-A each year.2 These forms are not filed with the FCC but rather with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which serves as the data collection agent. The pool of filers contained in this edition consists of companies that operated and collected revenue during 2006, as well as new companies that file the form to fulfill the Commission’s registration requirement.3 Information from filings received by USAC after October 16, 2007, and from filings that were incomplete has been excluded from this report.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 James A. Holtkamp (Bar No. 1533) Holland
    JAMES A. HOLTKAMP (BAR NO. 1533) HOLLAND & HART LLP 222 South Main, Suite 2200 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: (801) 799-5847 Facsimile: (801) 799-5700 THORVALD A. NELSON MARK A. DAVIDSON HOLLAND & HART LLP 6380 South Fiddlers Green Circle, Suite 500 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Telephone: (303) 290-1601 Facsimile: (303) 975-5290 Attorneys for Sprint Communications Company L.P. BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH In the Matter of the Application of Sprint Application of Sprint Communications Communications Company L.P. for Informal Company L.P. for Informal Adjudication of Adjudication of Indirect Transfer of Control. Indirect Transfer of Control Docket No. Sprint Communications Company L.P. (“Sprint Communications”), through its undersigned counsel and pursuant to Utah Code Ann. §§ 54-4-28, 54-4-29, 63G-4-203 and Utah Admin. Code R746-349-7, requests Utah Public Service Commission (“Utah PSC”) approval through informal adjudication of a transaction that will result in the indirect transfer of control of Sprint Communications, a Utah competitive local exchange carrier to Starburst II, Inc. (“Starburst II”). Under the transaction, Starburst II will become the direct parent of Sprint Nextel Corporation (“Sprint”) and indirect parent of Sprint Communications and SOFTBANK CORP. (“SoftBank”) will, through its newly formed affiliate Starburst I, Inc. (“Starburst I”), 1 invest $20.1 billion in Sprint and indirectly acquire approximately 70 percent of the shares of Sprint. I. INTRODUCTION A. Introduction of the Parties Sprint Communications Company L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership with a principal office located at 6200 Sprint Parkway, Overland Park, Kansas 66251.
    [Show full text]
  • Varejo Físico
    SUMÁRIO Prefácio O valor está no serviço. Sobre o Report O valor está no serviço; Uma nova economia de serviços; Os setores e o seu serviço; Por trás do índice. A Pesquisa Banco; Companhias Aéreas; Planos de Saúde; Provedores de Internet; Serviços Públicos; Telefonia Móvel; Tv Paga; Varejo Online; Varejo Físico. Glimpse into the Future Banco; Companhias Aéreas; Planos de Saúde; Provedores de Internet; Serviços Públicos; Telefonia Móvel; Tv Paga; Varejo Online; Varejo Físico. Apêndice USE no negócio; Equipe; USE em números. Prefácio A jornada do consumidor A globalização trouxe consigo um aumento exponencial na maneira como consumidores demandam e esperam das marcas com as quais interagem. Ao mesmo tempo, esses consumidores têm dividido seus gastos e atenção entre corporações, startups e plataformas de troca de valor. Marcas que pretendem competir nesse co). Essa visão holística das interações, - a partir da perspectiva do consumidor. E mercado global precisam desenvolver relações pensamentos e emoções do consumidor ajuda equipes de operação a alinhar pessoas, de proximidade com seus consumidores, não ao longo de determinado período de tempo processos e tecnologias para a entrega desse importando em que parte do mundo estejam ajuda organizações a compreenderem e valor ocorrer conforme prometido. operando. estabelecerem vínculos empáticos com Não é exagero meu quando eu digo que a seus consumidores. E as permite endereçar jornada do consumidor está no centro das Isso exigirá ir além do estudo dos problemas, necessidades e motivações não inovações mais significativas e duradouras que pontos de contato individuais ou, comumente expressadas. Ela serve para ajudar conhecemos hoje. até mesmo, da performance de marcas a compreenderem onde existe espaço A jornada do consumidor está também no iniciativas isoladas.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunications Provider Locator
    Telecommunications Provider Locator Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau January 2010 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by contacting Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail at [email protected]. This report can be downloaded and interactively searched on the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site located at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/locator.html. Telecommunications Provider Locator This report lists the contact information, primary telecommunications business and service(s) offered by 6,493 telecommunications providers. The last report was released March 13, 2009.1 The information in this report is drawn from providers’ Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets (FCC Form 499-A). It can be used by customers to identify and locate telecommunications providers, by telecommunications providers to identify and locate others in the industry, and by equipment vendors to identify potential customers. Virtually all providers of telecommunications must file FCC Form 499-A each year.2 These forms are not filed with the FCC but rather with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which serves as the data collection agent. The pool of filers contained in this edition consists of companies that operated and collected revenue during 2007, as well as new companies that file the form to fulfill the Commission’s registration requirement.3 Information from filings received by USAC after October 13, 2008, and from filings that were incomplete has been excluded from this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio TLD Endorsement from EBU Sister Unions (Members of the World
    .Radio TLD Endorsement from EBU sister unions (members of the World Broadcasting Unions WBU): • ABU - Asia Pacific Broadcasting Union • ASBU - Arab States Broadcasting Union • AUB - African Broadcasting Union • CBU - Caribbean Broadcasting Union • AIR/IAB - International Association of Broadcasting • NABA - North American Broadcasting Association • OTI - Organización de Telecomunicaciones Iberoamericanas Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union (ABU) 14 March 2012 Mr. Steve Crocker Chairman of the Board Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Dear Mr. Crocker, The Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union (ABU) welcomes dot-radio, the Internet Top Level domain that the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) proposes to create for the worldwide radio community. As a broadcasting Union representing broadcasters in the Asia-Pacific region, the ABU believes that the dot-radio proposal to be submitted by the EBU will provide added value for all radio broadcasters worldwide. As a Union, we are involved in radio and television broadcasting that is moving to the Internet as an important means of distribution, so this will add-value to the radio’s global community. The use of a specific global online name such as dot-radio will help create a unique space worldwide where all the radio community of the world can gather. In my capacity as Secretary-General of the ABU, I recommend that the dot-radio Top Level Domain proposal of the EBU be approved by ICANN. We are looking forward to you favourable action on this request. Sincerely, Dr. Javad Mottaghi Secretary-General ANNEXES Containing the following information: [NAME OF THE UNION – ASIA-PACIFIC BROADCASTING UNION] [WORLD REGION/S COVERED – ASIA-PACIFIC REGION] [WITH LEGAL OFFICES IN – KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA] [NAME OF THE LEGAL RESPONSIBLE – AXEL AGUIRRE, Legal Counsel] [BOARD MEMBERS LIST, with mention of the organizations represented - Attached] [LIST OF THE MEMBERS ORGANIZATIONS - Attached] [GOVERNING BODIES OF THE ORGANIZATIONS - General Assembly and Administrative Council – Members Attached] P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Softbank Tests Next-Gen IT Platform Based on Intel® Rack Scale
    WHITE PAPER SoftBank Tests Next-Generation IT Platform Based on Intel® Rack Scale Architecture in Pursuit of Information Revolution Intel® Rack Scale Architecture for Data Center Efficiency Executive Summary SoftBank Corp. is pursuing an “information revolution” that will spur the latest innovations in technol- ogy, including the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and smart robots. The company needs the IT platforms which support its rapidly growing businesses to have agility to optimize real-time performance and high efficiency to utilize all available resources. The consolidation of its Japanese telecommunications companies is what led SoftBank to consider the Intel® Rack Scale Ar- chitecture, which pools resources at the rack level and allocates them via software. During workload- based testing, a development test demonstrated a potential reduction in the number of servers, a great reduction in staff workload, and a significant electrical conservation. The test result also showed “Intel® Rack Scale Architecture is that both server and network delivery times and fault response times could be significantly reduced. Having concluded that Intel® Rack Scale Architecture is suitable as a next-generation platform for an integral piece of architecture real-time computing, SoftBank is now planning to test expansion functions and functional improve- for real-time computing at ments in preparation for the launch of Intel® Rack Scale Architecture. SoftBank as we accelerate our Consolidation of Japanese to give them the competitive advantage and global strategy including the IoT, Telecommunications Companies differentiate themselves, they must adopt Poses Challenge for IT Infrastructure a common IT platform to achieve synergies artificial intelligence, Consolidation between the four merged companies and improve efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Operating Income Increased by 49% (Yoy) 1H Net Income: 3.2 Times (Yoy)
    Earnings Results for the Interim Period Ended September 30, 2007 Analyst Meeting November 8, 2007 SOFTBANK CORP. 1H/FY2007 Summary of Consolidated Earnings Results <Highlights> 1. Consolidated earnings results: 1H operating income increased by 49% (YoY) 1H net income: 3.2 times (YoY) 2. Success in mobile operations: 1.14 million of net subscriber additions in 1H 3. Towards No.1 Internet company in Asia: IPO of Alibaba + Yahoo! JAPAN ‘Fiscal 2007’ refers to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, and other fiscal years are referred to in a corresponding manner. 2 Content Items Page Consolidated P/L Analysis 5 Consolidated B/S Analysis 18 Accounting Consolidated CF Analysis 26 CAPEX Status 28 Financial Activities 33 Finance Interest-bearing Debt Status 36 Investment Results 53 Broadband Infrastructure Segment 60 Fixed-line Telecommunications Segment 70 Operations Mobile Communications Segment 79 Appendices 99 3 Accounting Kazuko Kimiwada General Manager Accounting, Internal Control SOFTBANK CORP. 4 - Consolidated P/L Analysis - Consolidated B/S Analysis - Consolidated CF Analysis - CAPEX Status 5 Consolidated P/L summary <PL-1> (m JPY) FY2006 FY2007 1Q 2Q 1H 3Q 4Q Total 1Q 2Q QoQ 1H YoY Net Sales 494,231 625,941 1,120,173 702,195 721,850 2,544,219 663,084 701,660 38,575 1,364,745 244,571 Operating income 54,357 58,194 112,552 84,733 73,780 271,065 78,746 89,000 10,253 167,746 55,194 (Operating margin) 11.0% 9.3% 10.1% 12.1% 10.2% 10.7% 11.9% 12.7% ― 12.3% ― EBITDA 104,309 124,090 228,400 154,000 143,026 525,428 149,778 164,493 14,715 314,272
    [Show full text]
  • Technology and the Geography of the Foreign Exchange Market
    Working Paper Series Barry Eichengreen Cables, Sharks and Servers: Romain Lafarguette and Arnaud Mehl Technology and the Geography of the Foreign Exchange Market No 1889 / March 2016 Note: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the European Central Bank (ECB). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB Abstract We analyze the impact of technology on production and trade in services, focusing on the foreign exchange market. We identify exogenous technological changes by the connection of countries to submarine fiber- optic cables used for electronic trading, but which were not laid for purposes related to the foreign exchange market. We estimate the impact of cable connections on the share of offshore foreign exchange transactions. Cable connections between local markets and matching servers in the major financial centers lower the fixed costs of trading currencies and increase the share of currency trades occurring onshore. At the same time, however, they attenuate the effect of standard spatial frictions such as distance, local market liquidity, and restrictive regulations that otherwise prevent transactions from moving to the major financial centers. Our estimates suggest that the second effect dominates. Technology dampens the impact of spatial frictions by up to 80 percent and increases, in net terms, the share of offshore trading by 21 percentage points. Technology also has economically important implications for the distribution of foreign exchange transactions across financial centers, boosting the share in global turnover of London, the world’s largest trading venue, by as much as one-third.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepaid Service Guide【English Version】
    Please feel free to contact one of the following numbers Contact Information with any questions or problems: SoftBank Customer Support General Information(toll-free) From SoftBank handset 1 5 7 24-hour access with live customer support From landline 0800-919-0157 from 9:00 to 20:00 (Japan time) Troubleshooting(toll-free) From SoftBank handset 1 1 3 From landline 0800-919-0113 Universal Service System □ What is the Universal Service Fund? This system was established to finance essential nationwide public telecommunications services (landlines, public phones, emergency communications, etc.) by NTT East and NTT West, via pro rata telecom operator contributions to ensure a fair and stable service environment for all households. □ Universal Service Fee The Universal Service System launch, from January 2007, means all SoftBank Prepaid Service customers will be assessed and required to pay a fixed Universal Service Fee each time they recharge their phone.* * For more information, including the fee amount, please consult your local SoftBank Shop staff; call our Customer Support, or visit our website. □ Changes in the Universal Service Fee The fee borne by each telephone company for each telephone number (unit price for each telephone number) is English Version reviewed and determined by the Telecommunications Carriers Association (Universal Service Fund administrator) and Prepaid Service Guide【 】 subject to revision every six months. For this reason, the telephone charge payable by respective customers based on such revision is subject to change. for SoftBank Smartphone For details, please visit the website of the Telecommunications Carriers Association at (http://www.tca.or.jp/), or contact the voice recording / fax message service (03-3539-4830, available 24 hours a day).
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status on Ipv6 Deployment in Japan
    Current status and the future direction of IPv6 in Japan http://www.kokatsu.jp/ November, 2011 IPv4 Address Exhaustion Task Force, Japan Table of Contents 1. IPv6 Day for Japanese networks and contribution by Japanese cases to global IPv6 deployment. 2. Market Overview 3. Backbone operation – Commercial ISP 4. Last one mile operation 1. Broadband access(ADSL, FTTH, CATV) 2. Wireless access(LTE) 5. Others 2 Overview of Japanese IPv6 Networks • KDDI’s au ONENET works well at the 1st IPv6 Day • NTT DoCoMo provides IPv6 service over LTE (i.e., Xi) • Large scale IPv6 and IPv4 multi-home environment over NTT’s NGN will be deployed in 2012. 1. PPPoE (called as “tunneling”) 2. IPoE (called as “native”) • IPv6 Day of June 08, 2011 was “before” the development and deployment of PPPoE and IPoE. • We believe we need to establish good operational practice and experiences. – Multi-homing architecture and implementation discussed in RFC3484 and RFC 5220 Experience and practice at the 1st IPv6 Day • Solutions without PPPoE and IPoE over NGN 1. TCP session resetting ; we do not want to do this, but, without the well-deployment of RFC3484 multi-home policy management algorithm, this was one of feasible solutions. 2. Development and delivery of policy management and control software (RFC3484), by WIDE Project and by the TF on IPv4 address exhaustion • Japanese contribution to the rest of world 1. Establish appropriate “fall-back” behavior, e.g., reaction against the reception of the ICMP unreachable message 2. Feed-back of best practices by the advanced and large scale multi-homing environment with NTT’s NGN.
    [Show full text]