Cultural Heritage Audit Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultural Heritage Audit Report Arc Heritage Transforming the Trent Valley: Cultural Heritage Audit Report ArcHeritage 2017 Transforming the Trent Valley: Cultural Heritage Audit ArcHeritage Campo House, 54 Campo Lane, Sheffield, S1 2EG Phone: +44 (0)114 2728884 Fax: +44 (0)114 327979 3 [email protected] www.archeritage.co.uk Key Project Information Project Name Transforming the Trent Valley Cultural Heritage Audit Report Title Transforming the Trent Valley Cultural Heritage Audit Report status Final ArcHeritage Project No. 1098 Type of Project Cultural Heritage Audit Client Transforming the Trent Valley Steering Group NGR SK 2310 2200 (centred) Author Rowan May Illustrations Rowan May and Laura Strafford Editor Glyn Davies & David Knight Report Number and Date 201 7/70 21 st Nov ember 2017 Version and filename TTTV CHA v 2-3.docx Copyright Declaration: ArcHeritage give permission for the material presented within this report to be used by the archives/repository with which it is deposited, in perpetuity, although ArcHeritage retains the right to be identified as the author of all project documentation and reports, as specified in the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (chapter IV, section 79). The permission will allow the repository to reproduce material, including for use by third parties, with the copyright owner suitably acknowledged. Disclaimer: This Report has been prepared solely for the person/party which commissioned it and for the specifically titled project or named part thereof referred to in the Report. The Report should not be relied upon or used for any other project by the commissioning person/party without first obtaining independent verification as to its suitability for such other project, and obtaining the prior written approval of York Archaeological Trust for Excavation and Research Limited (“YAT”) (trading as ArcHeritage). YAT accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this Report being relied upon or used for any purpose other than the purpose for which it was specifically commissioned. Nobody is entitled to rely upon this Report other than the person/party which commissioned it. YAT accepts no responsibility or liability for any use of or reliance upon this Report by anybody other than the commissioning person/party. © York Archaeological Trust for Excavation and Research Limited. Registered Office: 47 Aldwark, York YO1 7BX. A Company Limited by Guarantee. Registered in England No. 1430801. A Registered Charity in England & Wales (No. 09060) and Scotland (No. SCO42846) i CONTENTS Executive summary ....................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2 Study area location & geology ................................................................................. 1 3 Aims and methodology ........................................................................................... 3 3.1 Aims....................................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 3 4 Summary by period ................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Early prehistoric (500,000 to 4000 BC) ................................................................................. 8 4.2 Later prehistoric (4000 BC to AD 43)................................................................................... 11 4.3 Roman (AD 43 to 450) ......................................................................................................... 16 4.4 Early medieval (450 to 1065) .............................................................................................. 17 4.5 Medieval (1066 to 1485) ..................................................................................................... 19 4.6 Post-medieval (1485 to 1750) ............................................................................................. 21 4.7 Industrial (1750 to 1900) ..................................................................................................... 22 4.8 Modern (1901 to present)................................................................................................... 24 5 Cultural heritage themes ....................................................................................... 27 5.1 Evolution of the river valley landscape ............................................................................... 27 5.2 Settlement evolution .......................................................................................................... 31 5.3 The spread of agriculture .................................................................................................... 36 5.4 Ritual and religion ............................................................................................................... 39 5.5 The development of transport networks ............................................................................ 44 5.6 Elite landscapes ................................................................................................................... 47 5.7 Key industries of the valley ................................................................................................. 52 5.8 The 20 th century military landscape .................................................................................... 53 6 Heritage at risk ..................................................................................................... 56 6.1 Summary of assets assessed as being at risk ...................................................................... 56 6.2 Risk factors .......................................................................................................................... 57 6.3 Priority sites for conservation ............................................................................................. 58 7 Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 60 8 References ............................................................................................................ 60 9 Glossary ............................................................................................................... 63 Figures......................................................................................................................... 64 Appendix 1: Heritage at risk & priority sites .................................................................. 65 Transforming the Trent Valley Cultural Heritage Audit Report No 2017/70 ii Figures Figure 1: Site location Figure 2: Plan showing designated sites Figure 3: Distribution of early prehistoric sites Figure 4: Distribution of later prehistoric sites Figure 5: Distribution of Roman sites Figure 6: Distribution of early medieval sites Figure 7: Distribution of medieval sites Figure 8: Distribution of post-medieval sites Figure 9: Distribution of industrial period sites Figure 10: Mapped palaeochannels within the study area Figure 11: Distribution of settlement sites by period (prehistoric to medieval) Figure 12: Distribution of settlement sites by period (post-medieval to modern) Figure 13: Distribution of agricultural sites by period Figure 14: Distribution of religious, ritual and funerary sites by category Figure 15: Distribution of religious, ritual and funerary sites by period Figure 16: Post-medieval to modern transport network Figure 17: Medieval to industrial period elite landscapes Figure 18: Distribution of industry sites by type Figure 19: Distribution of 20 th -century military sites Figure 20: Sites on Historic England's Heritage at Risk register Figure 21: Distribution of all sites identified as at risk Figure 22: Location of priority sites for conservation Plates Plate 1: Idealised transverse section through the Middle Trent river terrace sequence ............................... 2 Plate 2: Flint and quartzite handaxes from Willington gravel pits (asset 3100) .............................................. 9 Plate 3: Early Mesolithic flint tools from Swarkestone Lowes (asset 2535) .................................................. 10 Plate 4: Catholme ceremonial complex cropmarks, enclosed by later pit alignments ................................. 12 Plate 5: Swarkestone Lowes western barrow, viewed facing north .............................................................. 13 Plate 6: Earthwork remains of Ryknield Street in Beans Covert, Branston (asset 2385) .............................. 16 Plate 7: St Wilfrid's Church, Egginton, 14 th -century and later ........................................................................ 20 Plate 8: The 17 th -century Sudbury Hall (asset 2897) ...................................................................................... 21 Plate 9: Fradley Junction on the Trent and Mersey Canal and Coventry Canal (asset 1291) ....................... 22 Plate 10: Ind Coope Burton Brewery (asset 1750), Station Street, Burton-upon-Trent ............................... 23 Plate 11: WW2 pillbox (asset 1518) on the Clay Mills canal aqueduct (asset 2651) .................................... 24 Plate 12: Reused Nissen hut to the east of School Lane, Sudbury (asset 1244) ..........................................
Recommended publications
  • New Electoral Arrangements for Derbyshire Dales District Council Draft Recommendations February 2021
    New electoral arrangements for Derbyshire Dales District Council Draft Recommendations February 2021 Translations and other formats: To get this report in another language or in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England at: Tel: 0330 500 1525 Email: [email protected] Licensing: The mapping in this report is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2021 A note on our mapping: The maps shown in this report are for illustrative purposes only. Whilst best efforts have been made by our staff to ensure that the maps included in this report are representative of the boundaries described by the text, there may be slight variations between these maps and the large pdf map that accompanies this report, or the digital mapping supplied on our consultation portal. This is due to the way in which the final mapped products are produced. The reader should therefore refer to either the large pdf supplied with this report or the digital mapping for the true likeness of the boundaries intended. The boundaries as shown on either the large pdf map or the digital mapping should always appear identical. Contents Introduction 1 Who we are and what we do 1 What is an electoral review? 1 Why Derbyshire Dales? 2 Our proposals for Derbyshire Dales 2 How will the recommendations affect you?
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire and Derby Minerals Plan
    CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 4 Background 4 Spatial Context 7 National and Sub-National Aggregate Guidelines 8 2. AGGREGATE RESOURCES 9 Primary Aggregates 9 Secondary and Recycled Aggregates 10 3. ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL RESERVES & PRODUCTION 12 Sand & Gravel Resources & Reserves 12 Recent Production 15 Crushed Rock Resources & Reserves 17 Recent Production 21 Secondary & Recycled Aggregates 23 4. CALCULATING FUTURE PROVISION OF AGGREGATES 25 Future Provision of Sand & Gravel 25 Recent sales 25 Imports and Exports 25 Marine Won Sand and Gravel 27 Supply from adjacent areas 27 Future Economic Growth 28 Conclusions 31 Future Provision of Crushed Rock 33 Recent sales 33 Imports and Exports 33 Supply from adjacent areas 36 Future Economic Growth 36 Progressive Reduction in Quarrying in the Peak Park 37 Conclusions 38 2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Permitted sand and gravel quarries in Derbyshire 12 Table 2: Sales of sand and gravel in Derbyshire 2006-2015 15 Table 3: Use of sand and gravel 2015 15 Table 4: Active hard rock quarries in Derbyshire & Peak District 19 Table 5: Permitted but inactive hard rock quarries in Derbyshire & the Peak District 20 Table 6: Sales of aggregate crushed rock 2006-2015 22 Table 7: Use of crushed rock 2015 22 Table 8: Distribution of Sand and Gravel from Derbyshire, 2009 26 Table 9: Distribution of Crushed Rock from Derbyshire and Peak District 34 Quarries, 2009 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Derbyshire, Derby and the Peak District National Park 7 Figure 2: Sand and gravel resources in Derby and Derbyshire 14 Figure 3: Sales of sand and gravel in Derbyshire 2006-2015 against past and current provision rate 16 Figure 4: Limestone resources in Derbyshire & the Peak District 18 Figure 5: Sales of aggregate crushed rock 2006-2015 against past and current provision rate 22 Figure 6: Crushed rock inter-regional flows 2009 35 Cover photos: Tunstead and Old Moor Quarry, Buxton and Swarkestone Quarry, Barrow upon Trent 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Governance Review: – Barrow Upon Trent, Twyford
    COMMUNITY GOVERNANCE REVIEW: – BARROW UPON TRENT, TWYFORD & STENSON AND STENSON FIELDS - STAGE ONE CONSULTATION RESPONSES Appendix 4 Key: L = letter; E= e-mail Date No. Title First Name Surname Address Comment In favour Against Unknown Code rec’d / Initial 14.07.16 1 G Powell 55 Swarkestone Rd I have received a letter from yourselves attempting to explain Y E Barrow-upon-Trent the above review, I find the document confusing and actually DE73 7HF explains nothing, it is a 9 page document of waffle. So I would like to explain my position. I AM IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST BY BARROW-UPON-TRENT PARISH COUNCIL TO SDDC FOR THE CHANGE OF OUR PARISH BOUNDARY AS PROPOSED IN FEBUARY 2015. 14.07.16 2 A G Eley OBE AE 6 Beaumont Close I am a long-term resident of the village of Barrow on Trent Y E MRCGP Barrow on Trent and I am responding to the call for consultation regarding the Derby community governance review of the parish. Barrow on Trent DE73 7HQ is fortunate in having a Parish Council which reflects the feeling of the local residents. The Parish Council have been proposing to transfer the land in question to Stenson Fields Parish over a number of years Changes within the parish over the last 20 years have resulted in the parish becoming isolated from the north- eastern portion of the parish. This followed directly from the construction of the A50 road which cut across the parish and isolated the portion of the land which is contiguous to the parishes of Stenson Fields and the City of Derby.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment S0165
    GENERAL SITE INFORMATION SITE USAGE Site reference: S/0165 Site Description: Site Name: The site is used for a mix of equestrian and residential uses. - Site Address: Land at Arleston Farm Current Use: Agriculture and residential. Arleston, Barrow upon Trent - PUA/Non PUA: Non PUA Total site area (hectares): 3.29 Site allocation: N/A Greenfield: Brownfield: Net Developable Area: Developer interest: Low 3.29 0 Access to services: Status: Promoted Site Over 1km to nearest bus stop. The Planning History: site is within 20 minutes travel time of essential services. No relevant planning history CONSTRAINTS Policy constaints: The site has been considered against Local, Regional and National planning policy and it has been asssessed that the site is constrained by: - Countryside policy (EV1) in the South Derbyshire Local Plan 1998. Physical constraints (i.e. topography): The site has been assessed and it is considered that the site is not physically constrained. Environmental constraints including flood risk: The site has been assessed and it is considered that the site is not environmentally constrained. This assessment included consideration of flood risk. Access constraints: This site has been assessed and it is considered that the access to the site is constrained, due to: - there only being a track to the road network currently. Ownership constraints: From the information available to us it is considered that the site is currently in one ownership. Other: The site has been assessed and it is considered that there are no further constraints. SITE VIABILITY Are the constraints able to be overcome? Following the assessment of the site, it is considered that all of the constraints are able to be overcome in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Ticknall Statement.Pub
    Ticknall Conservation Area Character Statement 2013 CONSULTATION DRAFT SOUTH DERBYSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL Lullington Conservation Area Character Statement Ticknall Conservation Area Character Statement Ticknall Conservation Area Contents Introduction 1 Summary 1 Area of Archaeological Potential 3 Conservation Area Analysis 3 Historic Development 3 Approaches 4 Views 5 Building Materials and Details 6 Conservation Area Description 11 Loss and Damage 20 Conservation Area Map Appendix 1 Distinctive architectural details Appendix 2 Ticknall Conservation Area: Phases of Designation Ticknall Conservation Area Introduction This statement has been produced by Mel Morris Conservation for, and in association with, South Derbyshire District Council. It sets out the special historic and architectural interest that makes the character and appearance of Smisby worthy of protection. It also assesses the degree of damage to that special interest and thus opportunities for future enhancement. This document will be used by the Council when making professional judgements on the merits of development applications. The Ticknall Conservation Area was jointly designated by South Derbyshire District Council and Derbyshire Councty Council on 17th November 1972 and extended by the District Council on 24th November 1983. Summary Ticknall sits in a sheltered valley south of the River Trent on the busy A514 between Derby and Swadlincote. It is strategically placed on the district’s road network, with several roads radiating from the village and heading towards Repton, Swadlincote, Ashby-de-la-Zouch and Melbourne. Ticknall Conservation Area Character Statement Although often identified as an estate village, it was only between 1765 and the 1830s that the Harpur (later Crewe and Harpur Crewe) family of Calke Abbey finally bought out most Lullington Conservation Area Character Statement of the lesser freeholders, it being a well-established settlement long before then (first recorded in 1002).
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire Parish Registers. Marriages
    942.51019 M. L; Aalp v.4 1379092 GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00727 4241 DERBYSHIRE PARISH REGISTERS. flDarriagea, IV. phiiximore's parish register series. vol. xc. (derbyshire, vol. iv.) One hundred and fifty only printed. I0.ip.cj : Derbyshire Parish Registers, flftat triages. Edited by W. P. W. PHILLIMORE, M.A., B.C.L., AND LL. LL. SIMPSON. £,c VOL. IV. ILon&on Issued to the Subscribers by Phillimore & Co., 124, Chancery Lane. 1908. — PREFACE. As promised in the last volume of the Marriage Registers of Derbyshire, the marriage records of St. Alkmund's form the first instalment of the Registers of the County Town. The Editors do not doubt that these will prove especially interesting to Derbyshire people. In Volume V they hope to print further instalments of town registers in the shape of those of St. Michael's and also some village registers. It will be noticed that St. Alkmund's register begins at the earliest possible date, 1538, but of the remainder, two do not start till the seventeenth century and one, that of Quarndon, synchronizes with the passing of Lord Hardwicke's Marriage Act. 1379092 It will be convenient to give here a list of the Derby- shire parishes of which the Registers have been printed in this series: Volume I. Volume II. Dale Abbey Boulton Brailsford Duffield Stanton-by-Dale Hezthalias Lownd Volume III. Stanley or Lund Duffield Spondon Breaston Church Broughton Mellor Kirk Ireton Sandiacre Hault Hucknall Volume IV. Risley Mackworth Derby— St. Alkmund's Ockbrook Allestree Quarndon Tickenhall Foremark It has not been thought needful to print the entries — verbatim.
    [Show full text]
  • Lowland Derbyshire Biodiversity Action Plan 2011-2020
    Published by the Lowland Derbyshire Biodiversity Partnership 2011 Biodiversity Lowland 2011 Derbyshire ‐ 2020 Action Plan Contents Click links to go the various sections of the LBAP Section Quick start Guide Introduction Generic Action Plan Area Action Plans and Targets Action Area 1: Magnesian Limestone Action Area 2: Rother and Doe Lea Valleys Action Area 3: Peak Fringe Action Area 4: Erewash Valley Action Area 5: Claylands Action Area 6: Derby Action Area 7: Trent and Dove Valleys Action Area 8: National Forest area Cumulative Targets UK Priority Habitats—Background Information Farmland Grassland Heathland Wetland Woodland List of Lowland Derbyshire LBAP Partners Appendix 1: Detailed Maps of All Eight Action Areas (with Priority Habitats) these are available as eight 4MB files on CD or from www.derbyshirebiodiversity.org.uk Cover photos, clockwise from top left: Bulfinch. Credit: Laura Whitehead White Admiral. Credit: Debbie Alston Green Lane, north‐east Derbyshire. Credit: Debbie Alston www.derbyshirebiodiversity.org.uk Quick Start Guide 2 Quick Start Guide This Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) covers the Lowland Derbyshire region for the period 2011 to 2020. It identifies the basic actions we must collectively take if we are to protect and enhance the key biodiversity of this region. The UK Government recognises its international obligations and the economic urgency to protect biodiversity and ecosystems. This LBAP is part of that delivery and local reporting mechanism. Only those habitats and species meeting the UKBAP definitions of ‘Priority Habitat’ or ‘Priority Species’ are included in the targets for the Lowland Derbyshire Action Plans. The history and rationale behind the Local Biodiversity Action Plan is given in the Introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • B H I J Q L K M O N a E C D G
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 East_Staffordshire:Sheet 1 :Map 1: iteration 1_D THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF EAST STAFFORDSHIRE Draft recommendations for ward boundaries in the borough of East Staffordshire June 2020 Sheet 1 of 1 Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information applied as part of this review. This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2020. KEY TO PARISH WARDS BURTON CP A ST PETER'S OKEOVER CP B TOWN OUTWOODS CP C CENTRAL D NORTH E SOUTH STANTON CP SHOBNALL CP WOOTTON CP F CANAL G OAKS WOOD MAYFIELD CP STAPENHILL CP RAMSHORN CP H ST PETER'S I STANTON ROAD J VILLAGE UTTOXETER CP ELLASTONE CP K HEATH L TOWN UTTOXETER RURAL CP M BRAMSHALL N LOXLEY O STRAMSHALL WINSHILL CP DENSTONE CP P VILLAGE Q WATERLOO ABBEY & WEAVER CROXDEN CP ROCESTER CP O UTTOXETER NORTH LEIGH CP K M UTTOXETER RURAL CP UTTOXETER CP L UTTOXETER SOUTH N MARCHINGTON CP KINGSTONE CP DRAYCOTT IN THE CLAY CP CROWN TUTBURY CP ROLLESTON ON DOVE CP HANBURY CP DOVE STRETTON CP NEWBOROUGH CP STRETTON C D BAGOTS OUTWOODS CP ABBOTS ANSLOW CP HORNINGLOW BROMLEY CP & OUTWOODS BLITHFIELD CP HORNINGLOW B AND ETON CP E BURTON & ETON G F BURTON CP P SHOBNALL WINSHILL WINSHILL CP SHOBNALL CP HOAR CROSS CP TATENHILL CP Q A BRIZLINCOTE BRANSTON CP ANGLESEY BRIZLINCOTE CP CP BRANSTON & ANGLESEY NEEDWOOD H STAPENHILL I STAPENHILL CP J DUNSTALL CP YOXALL CP BARTON & YOXALL BARTON-UNDER-NEEDWOOD CP WYCHNOR CP 01 2 4 KEY BOROUGH COUNCIL BOUNDARY Kilometres PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY 1 cm = 0.3819 km PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY BAGOTS PROPOSED WARD NAME WINSHILL CP PARISH NAME.
    [Show full text]
  • Yoxall to the National Memorial Arboretum
    This leaflet can be used in conjunction with The National Forest Way OS Explorer 245 (The National Forest) The National Forest Way takes walkers on a 75-mile journey through a transforming Stage 12: landscape, from the National Memorial Arboretum in Staffordshire to Beacon Hill Country Park in Leicestershire. Yoxall to the On the way, you will discover the area’s evolution from a rural landscape, through Start National Memorial industrialisation and its decline, to the modern-day creation of a new forest, where 21st-century life is threaded through a mosaic End Arboretum of green spaces and settlements. Length: 5 miles / 8 kilometres The trail leads through young and ancient woodlands, market towns and the industrial heritage of this changing landscape. Burton upon Trent About this stage Swadlincote Start: Yoxall (DE13 8NQ) Ashby End: National Memorial Arboretum (DE13 7AR) de la Zouch Coalville On this stage, the route is never far from the River Swarbourn. You will enjoy views over the Trent Valley towards Lichfield with its prominent cathedral, passing through young woodlands and open river meadows. Visit the villages of Yoxall and Alrewas and the National Memorial Arboretum, a place of reflection and The National Forest Way was created by a remembrance. partnership of the National Forest Company, Derbyshire County Council, Leicestershire County Council and Staffordshire County The National Forest Company Council, with the generous Bath Yard, Moira, Swadlincote, support of Fisher German. Derbyshire DE12 6BA Telephone: 01283 551211 Enquiries: www.nationalforestway.co.uk/contact Website: www.nationalforest.org To find out more, visit: Photos: Jacqui Rock, Christopher Beech and www.nationalforestway.co.uk Martin Vaughan Maps reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO.
    [Show full text]
  • York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399
    York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399 Edited by David M. Smith 2020 www.york.ac.uk/borthwick archbishopsregisters.york.ac.uk Online images of the Archbishops’ Registers cited in this edition can be found on the York’s Archbishops’ Registers Revealed website. The conservation, imaging and technical development work behind the digitisation project was delivered thanks to funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Register of Alexander Neville 1374-1388 Register of Thomas Arundel 1388-1396 Sede Vacante Register 1397 Register of Robert Waldby 1397 Sede Vacante Register 1398 Register of Richard Scrope 1398-1405 YORK CLERGY ORDINATIONS 1374-1399 Edited by DAVID M. SMITH 2020 CONTENTS Introduction v Ordinations held 1374-1399 vii Editorial notes xiv Abbreviations xvi York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399 1 Index of Ordinands 169 Index of Religious 249 Index of Titles 259 Index of Places 275 INTRODUCTION This fifth volume of medieval clerical ordinations at York covers the years 1374 to 1399, spanning the archiepiscopates of Alexander Neville, Thomas Arundel, Robert Waldby and the earlier years of Richard Scrope, and also including sede vacante ordinations lists for 1397 and 1398, each of which latter survive in duplicate copies. There have, not unexpectedly, been considerable archival losses too, as some later vacancy inventories at York make clear: the Durham sede vacante register of Alexander Neville (1381) and accompanying visitation records; the York sede vacante register after Neville’s own translation in 1388; the register of Thomas Arundel (only the register of his vicars-general survives today), and the register of Robert Waldby (likewise only his vicar-general’s register is now extant) have all long disappeared.1 Some of these would also have included records of ordinations, now missing from the chronological sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Broughton Parish, Derbyshire
    Church Broughton Parish, Derbyshire: An oral history, 1900-1940 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Janet Arthur De Montfort University June 2019 Abstract This study is an oral history of a Derbyshire dairying parish during the first forty years of the twentieth century. The aim was to discover the nature and cohesion of society in a parish with no resident lord of the manor, the effects on the parish of changes in agricultural practice and the impact of government interventions on the lives of individuals. The lives of residents were affected by the history and layout of the parish, based on the geography and previous ownership. Having no resident lord of the manor generated a social structure with three layers: firstly, seven key people, outsiders who did not own land, secondly, networks of small landowners and artisans, who had lived there for generations, finally, labourers, many also families of long standing. Religion was important in supporting this social structure. Being an ‘open’ parish had enabled a chapel to be built and the provision of a school, though not all children attended this school. Through widespread ownership, there was a freedom to live and work without being beholden to neighbouring estates, as alternative employment could be found elsewhere for any surplus workers. Mechanisation improved farming practice, but, though government intervention during the First World War helped, the downturn afterwards and competition between farmers meant dairying was precarious, until the foundation of the Milk Marketing Board in 1933 to control production and price. The sale of the Duke of Devonshire’s farms in 1918 to the occupiers and the County Council removed the prestige that his tenants had enjoyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Premises Licence List
    Premises Licence List PL0002 Drink Zone Plus Premises Address: 16 Market Place Licence Holder: Jasvinder CHAHAL Uttoxeter 9 Bramblewick Drive Staffordshire Littleover ST14 8HP Derby Derbyshire DE23 3YG PL0003 Capital Restaurant Premises Address: 62 Bridge Street Licence Holder: Bo QI Uttoxeter 87 Tumbler Grove Staffordshire Wolverhampton ST14 8AP West Midlands WV10 0AW PL0004 The Cross Keys Premises Address: Burton Street Licence Holder: Wendy Frances BROWN Tutbury The Cross Keys, 46 Burton Street Burton upon Trent Tutbury Staffordshire Burton upon Trent DE13 9NR Staffordshire DE13 9NR PL0005 Water Bridge Premises Address: Derby Road Licence Holder: WHITBREAD GROUP PLC Uttoxeter Whitbread Court, Houghton Hall Business Staffordshire Porz Avenue ST14 5AA Dunstable Bedfordshire LU5 5XE PL0008 Kajal's Off Licence Ltd Premises Address: 79 Hunter Street Licence Holder: Rajeevan SELVARAJAH Burton upon Trent 45 Dallow Crescent Staffordshire Burton upon Trent DE14 2SR Stafffordshire DE14 2PN PL0009 Manor Golf Club LTD Premises Address: Leese Hill Licence Holder: MANOR GOLF CLUB LTD Kingstone Manor Golf Club Uttoxeter Leese Hill, Kingstone Staffordshire Uttoxeter ST14 8QT Staffordshire ST14 8QT PL0010 The Post Office Premises Address: New Row Licence Holder: Sarah POWLSON Draycott-in-the-Clay The Post Office Ashbourne New Row Derbyshire Draycott In The Clay DE6 5GZ Ashbourne Derbyshire DE6 5GZ 26 Jan 2021 at 15:57 Printed by LalPac Page 1 Premises Licence List PL0011 Marks and Spencer plc Premises Address: 2/6 St Modwens Walk Licence Holder: MARKS
    [Show full text]