A96 Dualling Inverness to Nairn (Including Nairn Bypass)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A96 Dualling Inverness to Nairn (Including Nairn Bypass) A96 Dualling Inverness to Nairn (including Nairn Bypass) DMRB Stage 3 Scheme Assessment Report Engineering, Traffic and Economic Assessment Volume 1 – Main Report and Appendices November 2016 A96 Dualling Inverness to Nairn (including Nairn Bypass) DMRB Stage 3 Scheme Assessment Report Engineering, Traffic and Economic Assessment A96 Dualling Inverness to Nairn (including Nairn Bypass) Project no: B2103500 Document title: DMRB Stage 3 Scheme Assessment Report Document No.: B2103500-HW-0100-RP-015 Revision: 0 Date: November 2016 Client name: Transport Scotland Client no: TS/MTRIPS/SER/2014/06 Project manager: Helen Gregory Author: Graeme Herd File name: http://ipe5.jacobs.com/sites/A96/stage3/WP02 DMRB Stage 3 Report/A96 I-N DMRB Stage 3 Report Vol 1 - Cover and Contents.docx Jacobs U.K. Limited 95 Bothwell Street Glasgow G2 7HX United Kingdom T +44 (0) 141 243 8000 www.jacobs.com © Crown copyright 2016. You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected] . Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 0 29/11/16 Final Issue LF GAH EHG i A96 Dualling Inverness to Nairn (including Nairn Bypass) DMRB Stage 3 Scheme Assessment Report Engineering, Traffic and Economic Assessment Contents Part 1 – Environmental Statement Part 2 – Engineering, Traffic and Economic Assessment Volume 1 – Main Report and Appendices Glossary of Terms ................................................................................................................................................ iv Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background to Proposed Scheme ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Scheme Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 The Proposed Scheme ............................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.5 DMRB Stage 3 Scheme Assessment Report ........................................................................................... 1-3 1.6 Do-Minimum Definition ............................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.7 References ............................................................................................................................................... 1-3 2 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Man-made Features ................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Existing Road Network ............................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.4 Other Carriageway Features .................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.5 Existing Structures .................................................................................................................................. 2-14 2.6 Public Utilities ......................................................................................................................................... 2-20 2.7 Existing Traffic Patterns.......................................................................................................................... 2-21 2.8 Existing Accident Data............................................................................................................................ 2-22 2.9 Operational Issues .................................................................................................................................. 2-23 2.10 References ............................................................................................................................................. 2-23 3 Description of the Proposed Scheme .................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Engineering Description ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Cost Estimate ......................................................................................................................................... 3-11 3.3 References ............................................................................................................................................. 3-13 4 Engineering Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Engineering Standards ............................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Climate, Topography and Land Use ......................................................................................................... 4-3 4.3 Geology, Ground Conditions and Earthworks .......................................................................................... 4-4 4.4 Drainage, Hydrology and Hydrogeology ................................................................................................ 4-11 4.5 Public Utilities ......................................................................................................................................... 4-18 4.6 Structures ............................................................................................................................................... 4-20 4.7 Fencing and Environmental Barriers ...................................................................................................... 4-28 4.8 Traffic Signs and Road Markings, Traffic Signals and Lighting.............................................................. 4-28 4.9 Lay-Bys ................................................................................................................................................... 4-30 4.10 Road Restraint Systems ......................................................................................................................... 4-30 4.11 Road Pavement ...................................................................................................................................... 4-30 4.12 Indicative Construction Sequence .......................................................................................................... 4-31 ii A96 Dualling Inverness to Nairn (including Nairn Bypass) DMRB Stage 3 Scheme Assessment Report Engineering, Traffic and Economic Assessment 4.13 References ............................................................................................................................................. 4-33 5 Traffic Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Model Inputs and Assumptions ................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.3 Existing Traffic Operational Review ......................................................................................................... 5-2 5.4 Accident Summary ................................................................................................................................... 5-4 5.5 Traffic Modelling ....................................................................................................................................... 5-5 6 Economic Assessment .......................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Proposed Scheme Costs .........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A96 Dualling Programme
    A96 Dualling Programme Strategic Environmental Assessment Tier 2 Environmental Report An agency of Buidheann le May 2015 An agency of Buidheann le A96 Dualling Programme Strategic Environmental Assessment Tier 2 Environmental Report Document: TSEA96/ER/02 Transport Scotland May 2015 A96 Dualling – Strategic Environmental Assessment – Tier 2 – Environmental Report Document history A96 Dualling Programme Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Tier 2 Environmental Report Transport Scotland This document has been issued and amended as follows: Approved Version Date Description Created by Verified by by 1.0 January 2015 Discussion Draft Susan Rodger/ Henry Collin John Fox Gwenn Greenwood 1.1 April 2015 Draft for Client Comment Ailsa Collin / Gwenn Henry Collin John Fox Greenwood / Henry Collin 1.2 May 2015 Issue Version Ailsa Collin / Gwenn Henry Collin John Fox Greenwood / Henry Collin A96 Dualling – Strategic Environmental Assessment – Tier 2 – Environmental Report Limitations Halcrow Group Ltd, now known as CH2M HILL, has been instructed to provide a Strategic Environmental Assessment of the A96 Dualling Programme on behalf of Transport Scotland. The assessment is based on the information that has been made available at the time of publication and this Environmental Report is presented as a consultation document. Any subsequent additional information arising during the public consultation period may require revision or refinement of the conclusions. It should be noted that: • The findings within this report represent the professional opinion of experienced environmental scientists, sustainability consultants and other specialists. CH2M HILL does not provide legal advice and the advice of lawyers may also be required. • All work carried out in preparing this report has utilised and is based upon CH2M HILL’s professional knowledge and understanding of current relevant European Union, UK and Scottish standards and codes, technology and legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Place-Names of Inverness and Surrounding Area Ainmean-Àite Ann an Sgìre Prìomh Bhaile Na Gàidhealtachd
    Place-Names of Inverness and Surrounding Area Ainmean-àite ann an sgìre prìomh bhaile na Gàidhealtachd Roddy Maclean Place-Names of Inverness and Surrounding Area Ainmean-àite ann an sgìre prìomh bhaile na Gàidhealtachd Roddy Maclean Author: Roddy Maclean Photography: all images ©Roddy Maclean except cover photo ©Lorne Gill/NatureScot; p3 & p4 ©Somhairle MacDonald; p21 ©Calum Maclean. Maps: all maps reproduced with the permission of the National Library of Scotland https://maps.nls.uk/ except back cover and inside back cover © Ashworth Maps and Interpretation Ltd 2021. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2021. Design and Layout: Big Apple Graphics Ltd. Print: J Thomson Colour Printers Ltd. © Roddy Maclean 2021. All rights reserved Gu Aonghas Seumas Moireasdan, le gràdh is gean The place-names highlighted in this book can be viewed on an interactive online map - https://tinyurl.com/ybp6fjco Many thanks to Audrey and Tom Daines for creating it. This book is free but we encourage you to give a donation to the conservation charity Trees for Life towards the development of Gaelic interpretation at their new Dundreggan Rewilding Centre. Please visit the JustGiving page: www.justgiving.com/trees-for-life ISBN 978-1-78391-957-4 Published by NatureScot www.nature.scot Tel: 01738 444177 Cover photograph: The mouth of the River Ness – which [email protected] gives the city its name – as seen from the air. Beyond are www.nature.scot Muirtown Basin, Craig Phadrig and the lands of the Aird. Central Inverness from the air, looking towards the Beauly Firth. Above the Ness Islands, looking south down the Great Glen.
    [Show full text]
  • Man in Moray
    10 0 I w! Fig.2.1 Moray. MANIN MORAY 5,000 years of history Ian Keillar Synopsis The extent of Moray is defined and the physical conditions briefly described. Traces of Mesolithic man have been found in the Culbin, and later Neolithic peoples found Moray an attractive place to settle. As metal working became established, trades routes followed and Moray flourished. As the climate deteriorated, so, apparently, did the political situation and defensive sites became necessary. The Romans came and went and the Picts rose and fell. The Vikings did not linger on these shores and MacBeth never met any witches near Forres. The Kings of Scots divided and ruled until they themselves set a pattern, which still continues, that if you want to get on you must go south to London. In distant Moray, brave men like Montrose and foolish men like Prince Charles Edward, fought for their rightful king. The Stuarts, however, ill rewarded their followers. Road makers and bridge builders half tamed the rivers, and the railways com­ pleted the process. With wars came boom years for the farmers, but even feather beds wear out and Moray is once more in apparent decline. However, all declines are relative and the old adage still has relevance: 'Speak wee] o the Hielans but live in the Laich.' Physical The name Moray is now applied to a local authority administrative District extending from west of Forres and the Findhorn to Cullen and stretching down in an irregular triangle into the highlands of the Cairngorms (Fig.2. l ). In Medieval times, Moray reached as far as Lochalsh on the west coast and there has always been some difficulty in defining the bound­ aries of the province.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Impact of Inverness Airport
    www.hie.co.uk ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF INVERNESS AIRPORT Final Report September 2018 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 Background to the study 2 Study objectives 2 Study methodology 2 Study contents 3 2 Overview of Inverness Airport and Air Service Activity 4 Introduction 4 Evolution of Inverness Airport 4 Trends in activity 5 Scheduled route analysis 8 Measuring global business connectivity 14 Passenger leakage from Inverness catchment area 16 3 Quantified Economic Impact Assessment 18 Introduction 18 On-site impacts 18 Inbound visitor impacts 22 Valuation of passenger time savings 24 4 Wider Catalytic and Social Impacts 26 Introduction 26 Contribution to economic growth 27 The airport services 28 Business impacts 30 Social impacts 32 Future priorities for the airport and services 33 5 Summary of Findings 36 Introduction 36 Summary of findings 36 Appendices 38 Appendix 1: EIA Methodology and Workings 39 Appendix 2: List of Consultees 41 Appendix 3: Measuring Global Connectivity 42 Introduction 42 Direct flights 42 Onward connections 43 Fit of Inverness air services with Growth Sector requirements 46 Appendix 4: Inbound Visitor Impacts 49 Introduction 49 Visitor expenditures 50 Gross economic impacts 52 Appendix 5: Valuation of Passenger Time Savings 54 Approach 54 i 1 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY 1.1 ekosgen, in partnership with Reference Economic Consultants, was commissioned by Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) and Highlands and Islands Airports Limited (HIAL) to undertake an economic and social impact study of Inverness Airport. 1.2 Inverness Airport is the principal airport in the Highlands and Islands and the fourth busiest in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardmuir to Fochabers
    A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Fochabers: Preferred option A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Fochabers: Preferred option A96 Dualling A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Fochabers: Preferred option KEY Further information What happens next? Introduction Existing A96 dual carriageway section Shortlisted options assessment Hardmuir to Fochabers scheme Existing A96 single carriageway section Should you wish to contact Inverness to Nairn (inc. Nairn bypass) Transport Scotland is progressing an Lossiemouth AWPR Transport Scotland and its consultants Mott MacDonald Sweco will further develop Mott MacDonald Sweco, For the purposes of options assessment the A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Buckie ambitious programme that will see the Ban Fochabers scheme has been divided into three sections: the preferred option. details for the stakeholder Preferred option HARDMUIR TO FOCHABERS Elgin dualling of the A96 between Inverness A96 Transport Scotland will look to publish draft Orders and an Environmental Impact team are: Fraserburgh • Hardmuir to Hillhead. and Aberdeen by 2030. The route is Assessment Report for the A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Fochabers scheme during the Keith Public exhibitions A96 Fochabers • Hillhead to Lhanbryde. Landowner and Communities approximately 160km (99 miles) long, Forres second half of 2020 for formal comment. Nairn • Lhanbryde to East of Fochabers. of which 138km (86 miles) is currently The draft Road Orders will define the line of the developed preferred option. The draft Manager: Dave Gowans December 2018 Huntly Peterhead For each section, the performance of a north and a south option has single carriageway. INVERNESS Compulsory Purchase Order will define the extent of land required to deliver, operate Tel: 01309 250 380 been assessed to determine a preference.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Scotland — A96 Inveramsay Bridge Improvement 7-1 7
    Transport Scotland — A96 Inveramsay Bridge Improvement 7 CULTRAL HERITAGE 7.1 Introduction This Chapter provides an assessment of the potential effects of the construction and operation of the proposed A96 Inveramsay Bridge Improvements (the Scheme) on cultural heritage (built heritage, archaeology and designed historic landscapes). As a highways Scheme, this assessment has been prepared in accordance with the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) Detailed Assessment (DMRB Volume 11 Section 3, Part 2 Cultural Heritage HA 208/07, 2007). In accordance with advice contained in DMRB Volume 11, an Options Appraisal (Stage 2 Simple Assessment) was undertaken in September 2011. This determined that the cultural heritage resource had the potential to be impacted by the Scheme. This was confirmed as part of a Scoping exercise (April 2012) which concluded that a detailed assessment was required. The objective of a DMRB Detailed Assessment (Volume 11, Parts 2 and 3), as required for inclusion in the Environmental Statement, is to: undertake sufficient assessment to identify the location, type and importance of cultural heritage constraints; characterise and assess the importance of the cultural heritage of the study area; determine the likely nature and scale of potential impacts from construction and operation of the Scheme; and determine mitigation measures to reduce or remedy any adverse impacts. 7.2 Approach & Methods 7.2.1 Plans and Policies This assessment has been undertaken in accordance with current legislation and planning policy. The following relevant documents have been used in the preparation of this report: The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2011; Historic Environment (Amendment) (Scotland) Act 2011; Scottish Historic Environment Policy (SHEP) 2011; Scottish Planning Policy (2010); and Planning Advice Note 2/2011 – Planning and Archaeology (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Cameron Duncan-Cox 120007535
    An Evaluation of Tornagrain A Scottish New Urbanist Town Property Development Processes UP51005 2020/21 Cameron Duncan-Cox 120007535 F0.1 - Front Cover Graphic Personally edited from Early Tornagrain Concept Illustration[ F0.2 - Early Tornagrain Concept Illustration [https://i.pinimg.com/originals/8c/fc/3b/8cfc3b8b39cd18008fd5acff762a2791.jpg] Page Intentionally Left Blank Executive Summary Contents This report aims to evaluate the growing New Urbanist settlement 01 - Megaprojects & Contexual Framework 7 of Tornagrain, which is located in the Scottish Highlands, and 1.1 - Tornagrain as a megaproject 8 communicate an understanding of how this project was informed by 1.2 -Socioeconomic Context 10 Poundbury and in turn informs Chapelton. 1.3 - Planning Policy Context 12 Tornagrain qualifi es as a megaproject by virtue of its brief which shares characteristics of other projects with comparable scale and 02 - Critical Evaluation Framework 15 cost and through contextual framework it describes the premise for 2.1 -Evaluation Framework 16 Tornagrain’s conception. 2.2 - Front End Planning 16 2.3 - Land Ownership 17 To evaluate the development, a critical evaluation framework was 2.4 - Securing Funding 18 devised. It analyses the key components of Moray Estates Development 2.5 - Establishing Design Team 19 Company’s (MEDCO) front end planning which sought to understand 2.6 - Establishing Principles 20 it’s established counterpart in England. It utilised a charrette workshop 2.7 - Project Feasibility 21 to provide opportunity for early community engagement. From both of which a design was formulated to ensure the New Urbanist 2.8 - Project Governance 23 fundamentals within its Scottish context. 2.9 - Stakeholders 24 2.10- Design Code 26 However, the phased project is signifi cantly behind schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • ELC Expansion: Exploring Innovative Delivery Models to Sustain Rural Communities
    ELC Expansion: Exploring innovative delivery models to sustain rural communities March 2020 1 Index CONTENTS SECTION1: POLICY CONTEXT………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 SECTION 2: EARLY LEARNING AND CHILDCARE CONTEXT…………………………………………………………………. 10 SECTION 3: LITERATURE CONTEXT………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17 SECTION 4: METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 27 SECTION 5: WORKFORCE………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….36 SECTION 6: ALTERNATIVE PLACES AND TIMES………………………………………………………………………………….53 SECTION 7: INTERGENERATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS……………………………………………………………………………69 SECTION 8: TRANSPORT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………90 SECTION 9: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS…………………………………………………………………..102 SECTION 10: REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………………115 SECTION 11: APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….134 APPENDIX 1: Highland ELC Provider Survey…………………………………………………………………………………….135 APPENDIX 2: Request to Local Authorities………………………………………………………………………………………145 APPENDIX 3: Visits to Outdoor Settings………………………………………………………………………………………….146 APPENDIX 4: Visits to Dispersed Settings………………………………………………………………………………………..152 APPENDIX 5: Outdoor places at indoor settings……………………………………………………………………………..155 APPENDIX 6: Supporting the workforce………………………………………………………………………………………….157 APPENDIX 7: Rural parents survey and results………………………………………………………………………………..157 APPENDIX 8: International intergenerational programmes…………………………………………………………….161 APPENDIX 9: Origins of outdoor learning -
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Newton Croft, Bucksburn 5.2 Site Address Land At
    5. Site Details 5.1 What name would you like the Land at Newton Croft, Bucksburn site to be known by? (Please note if the site is currently included within the ALDP2017 please use the OP site number) 5.2 Site Address Land at Newton Croft, Bucksburn 5.3 Postcode AB21 9PD 5.4 Have you any information for No the site on the internet? If so please provide the web address: 5.5 Is the site currently being The land is under option to Mactaggart & Mickel marketed? Homes Ltd, an established national housebuilder. 5.6 Site Location Map OS Base Map attached. (Please include an OS Map with the Boundary of the site clearly marked) 5.7 Please provide the National Grid reference of the site. 5.8 What is the current use of the Grazing land site? 5.9 Has there been any previous No development on the site? If yes please provide details 6. Legal and Planning History 6.1 Please indicate the Sole owner relationship to the Part owner Proposer or Person / Option to purchase Organisation they are working on No legal interest behalf of, has with the site. 6.2 Is the site under Yes, the site is under option to Mactaggart & option to a Mickel Homes Ltd, an established national developer? housebuilder. 6.3 Is the proposed site No included in the ALDP2017? 6.4 Is the proposed site N/A included in the Aberdeen City Centre Masterplan? 6.5 Has the site been Yes, through previous LDP processes. subject of previous discussions with the Council or any agent there of? 6.6 Has the site been No subject of previous Planning Applications? (Please 6.7 Has the site been Yes, Partially.
    [Show full text]
  • I General Area of South Quee
    Organisation Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Address Line3 City / town County DUNDAS PARKS GOLFGENERAL CLUB- AREA IN CLUBHOUSE OF AT MAIN RECEPTION SOUTH QUEENSFERRYWest Lothian ON PAVILLION WALL,KING 100M EDWARD FROM PARK 3G PITCH LOCKERBIE Dumfriesshire ROBERTSON CONSTRUCTION-NINEWELLS DRIVE NINEWELLS HOSPITAL*** DUNDEE Angus CCL HOUSE- ON WALLBURNSIDE BETWEEN PLACE AG PETERS & MACKAY BROS GARAGE TROON Ayrshire ON BUS SHELTERBATTERY BESIDE THE ROAD ALBERT HOTEL NORTH QUEENSFERRYFife INVERKEITHIN ADJACENT TO #5959 PEEL PEEL ROAD ROAD . NORTH OF ENT TO TRAIN STATION THORNTONHALL GLASGOW AT MAIN RECEPTION1-3 STATION ROAD STRATHAVEN Lanarkshire INSIDE RED TELEPHONEPERTH ROADBOX GILMERTON CRIEFFPerthshire LADYBANK YOUTHBEECHES CLUB- ON OUTSIDE WALL LADYBANK CUPARFife ATR EQUIPMENTUNNAMED SOLUTIONS ROAD (TAMALA)- IN WORKSHOP OFFICE WHITECAIRNS ABERDEENAberdeenshire OUTSIDE DREGHORNDREGHORN LOAN HALL LOAN Edinburgh METAFLAKE LTD UNITSTATION 2- ON ROAD WALL AT ENTRANCE GATE ANSTRUTHER Fife Premier Store 2, New Road Kennoway Leven Fife REDGATES HOLIDAYKIRKOSWALD PARK- TO LHSROAD OF RECEPTION DOOR MAIDENS GIRVANAyrshire COUNCIL OFFICES-4 NEWTOWN ON EXT WALL STREET BETWEEN TWO ENTRANCE DOORS DUNS Berwickshire AT MAIN RECEPTIONQUEENS OF AYRSHIRE DRIVE ATHLETICS ARENA KILMARNOCK Ayrshire FIFE CONSTABULARY68 PIPELAND ST ANDREWS ROAD POLICE STATION- AT RECEPTION St Andrews Fife W J & W LANG LTD-1 SEEDHILL IN 1ST AID ROOM Paisley Renfrewshire MONTRAVE HALL-58 TO LEVEN RHS OFROAD BUILDING LUNDIN LINKS LEVENFife MIGDALE SMOLTDORNOCH LTD- ON WALL ROAD AT
    [Show full text]
  • FCC Response to A96 Route Options Update Aug2018
    A96 Dualling Team, Transport Scotland, Buchanan House, 58 Port Dundas Road, Glasgow G4 0HF 14th September 2018 Dear Sirs A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Fochabers scheme Route options – Design update August 2018 Thank you for the recent information on the route options being considered for the A96 dualling in the Forres area. The Finderne Community Council (FCC) notes that the southern, Red, route remains under consideration and would make a number of observations and requests for further information with regard to the potential environmental, economic and community impacts of this route as set out below: 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1.1 Landscape - Proposed crossing of the B9010 The FCC has previously been advised by the project team that the existing B9010 Rafford to Forres road would pass under the proposed dualled A96. We are concerned to note that the revised proposals now have the B9010 being elevated via an embankment with a fly-over bridge across the A96. The concerns that we have previously lodged with regard to the visual impact of significant embankment works across this stretch of countryside have been exacerbated by the revisions made to the proposals. The extent of embankments for both the dualled A96 and the B9010 fly- over will totally dominate the visual appearance of the area. Marcassie Farm Lodges Previous B9010 crossing Revised B9010 crossing 1.2 Woodland Removal The woodlands of Moray and particularly of Finderne are some of our most highly valued environmental assets making a significant contribution to the local landscape, local economy (through on-going timber production), biodiversity, and general quality of life through provision of recreational facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation, Sifting and Appraisal of Interventions
    Appendix A - Interventions taken forward from the Sifting Process National STPR Interventions 50 National Report 3 Page A1 of A168 Appendix A - Interventions taken forward from the Sifting Process National Intervention 301 Expansion of Trunk Road Intelligent Transport System Description Introduction of a toolkit of measures on the motorway and the trunk road network in Central Scotland, covering priority vehicle lanes, ramp metering and intelligent signing. Justification This intervention will contribute to several national objectives, including 'journey time reductions on the trunk road network for prioritised vehicles' and (improved) journey time reliability for all users while 'maximising the labour catchment area in city regions'. This will have a significant impact on road users through efficient management of the trunk road network and by providing journey time information. There are unlikely to be any deliverability issues with this intervention as it would be implemented in line with emerging best practice experience from across Scotland and the UK. National objectives addressed: Objective Addressed Promote 'competitive' inter-urban journey times. Objective Addressed Reduce inter-urban journey time on public transport. Objective Addressed Promote journey time reduction on the trunk road network for prioritised vehicles and users (e.g. high occupancy vehicles, freight, bus) where STAG appraisal demonstrates that a strong economic case can be balanced with environmental objectives. Elsewhere on the trunk road network provide improvements to journey time reliability. Objective Addressed Promote journey time reductions between the central belt and Aberdeen/Inverness primarily to allow business to achieve an effective working day when travelling between these centres. Objective Addressed Maximise the labour catchment area in city regions where economic evidence demonstrates that this is required (favouring public transport and high occupancy vehicles and balancing with other policy measures that promote reduction in need to travel i.e.
    [Show full text]