DOCSLIB.ORG

Context and Responsibilities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014 to 2019 UPDATE 2 January 2019 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park – Park Management Plan January 2019 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park – Park Management Plan January 2019 Contents FRONTISPIECE 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 PART 1 HISTORY AND CONTEXT INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park 4 1.2 The London Legacy Development Corporation 4 1.3 Purpose of the Park Management Plan 6 1.4 Content and Structure of the Park Management Plan 7 1.5 Development of the Park Management Plan 10 1.6 Adoption and Implementation of the Park Management Plan 10 HISTORICAL CONTEXT – The Creation of Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park 11 2.1 Early History – the Site Pre-games 11 2.2 Preparation for Games Mode 12 2.3 Transformation 13 2.4 Management and Maintenance – During Games Mode and Transformation 15 2.5 Management and Maintenance – Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park 15 STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK 16 3.1 National and Regional Designations and Policies 16 3.2 Regional Strategic Planning Context 17 QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK – Summary Planning History 22 4.1 Key Planning Conditions and Commitments 22 4.2 The Legacy Communities Scheme 23 4.3 Park Management Plan Planning Obligations 24 4.4 Land Ownership and Management Responsibilities 24 LLDC STRATEGIC AND POLICY CONTEXT 26 5.1 LLDC Policy Documents and Priority Themes 26 BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 33 6.1 Background 33 6.2 2013 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park BAP 34 PART 2 THE VISION THE VISION 37 7.1 The Park Vision 37 7.2 The Park Management Vision 38 7.3 Statement of Significance 38 7.4 The Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Strategic and Design Objectives 39 7.5 The North Park Design Objectives 41 7.6 The South Park Design Objectives 41 7.7 The Park Design Guide 2018 42 THE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 43 8.1 Working with Partners 43 8.2 The Park Community 43 8.3 Green Flag 44 8.4 Maintaining High Standards and Performance 44 8.5 Character and Views 44 8.6 Conserving Heritage and Archaeology 44 8.7 Sustainability 46 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park – Park Management Plan January 2019 8.8 Biodiversity 46 8.9 Water Conservation and Management 46 8.10 Energy Conservation and Carbon Reduction 46 8.11 Waste Management and Recycling 46 8.12 Adaptation to Climate Change 46 8.13 Access and Inclusion 47 8.14 Safety and Security 47 8.15 Events and Activities 47 8.16 Marketing 49 8.17 Development Platforms and Interim Uses 49 8.18 Monitoring and Review 49 PART 3 GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT PARK GOVERNANCE 50 9.1 The Park Governance Structure 50 9.2 Estate Facilities Management Structure 52 9.3 EFM Community Commitments and ‘Our Parklife’ 55 9.4 Park Headquarters and Depot 56 9.5 Environmental Management System 56 9.6 The Lee Valley Regional Park Authority 57 9.7 Waterway Management - Roles and Responsibilities 57 9.8 Park Budget 58 9.9 Venue Management 58 9.10 Park Byelaws 59 9.11 Policing and Security 59 9.12 Events Management 60 PART 4 THE PARK ESTATE PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION 62 10.1 Topography 62 10.2 Geology 62 10.3 Soils and Contamination Issues 62 10.4 Water Control and Flood Risk Management 64 CHARACTER AREAS 66 11.1 Introduction 66 11.2 South Park 66 11.3 North Park 69 11.4 Canal Park 71 11.5 Waterways 71 11.6 Trees: The Park Tree Matrix 72 THE PARK INFRASTRUCTURE 74 12.1 Fencing, Gates and Railings 74 12.2 Paths, Roads, Bridges and Underpasses 74 12.3 Park Furniture and Signage 76 12.4 Lighting 76 12.5 CCTV 76 12.6 Irrigation and Drainage 76 12.7 Public Art 77 PARK HUBS 80 13.1 North Park Hub 80 13.2 South Park Hub 80 VENUES 81 14.1 ArcelorMittal Orbit 81 14.2 Stadium 81 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park – Park Management Plan January 2019 14.3 Aquatics Centre 81 14.4 Copper Box Arena 81 14.5 Velopark 81 14.6 Lee Valley Hockey and Tennis Centres 81 PART 5 ACTIVITIES, EVENTS AND PARK USERS TRAVEL AND ACCESS 82 15.1 Park Opening Hours 82 15.2 Travel Plan Framework 82 15.3 Car Parking 83 15.4 Cycling and Pedestrian Routes 83 15.5 Accessibility and Inclusion 84 15.6 Park Mobility Scheme 86 PARK ACTIVITIES AND PARTICIPATION 88 16.1 Community Engagement Programme 88 16.2 Education and Learning 90 VISITOR PROFILES AND MONITORING 92 17.1 Visitor Profiles 92 17.2 Visitor Monitoring 92 17.3 Visitor Satisfaction 92 PART 6 MANAGEMENT PRESCRIPTIONS NORTH PARK GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 93 18.1 Lawns and Grassland 95 18.2 Meadows 96 18.3 Interim Landscape Zones – Landscape Rooms 99 18.4 Ornamental Planting 102 18.5 Woodlands, Trees and Hedges 105 18.6 Waterways 119 18.7 Wetlands, Ponds and Swales 121 18.8 North Hub Succession Garden 125 18.9 Tumbling Bay Play Area 127 SOUTH PARK GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 129 19.1 Lawns and Grassland 131 19.2 Meadows 132 19.3 Gardens and Ornamental Planting 138 19.4 Woodlands, Trees and Hedges 149 19.5 Wetlands 164 19.6 Allotments 165 19.7 Play Room and Water Labyrinth 166 CANAL PARK GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 168 20 Canal Park 168 CLEANSING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 172 21.1 Litter and Cleansing 172 21.2 Waste Management 173 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park – Park Management Plan January 2019 STRUCTURES AND HARD LANDSCAPE FABRIC 174 22.1 Paths, Roads, Bridges and Underpasses 174 22.2 Fencing, Gates and Railings 177 22.3 Park Furniture and Signage 178 22.4 Lighting and Halo Turbines 179 22.5 Irrigation and Drainage 180 22.6 Public Art 182 22.7 History Trees 184 22.8 Artificial Wildlife Refuges 186 22.9 H10 Bridge Lift 187 22.10 Development Platform Frontages: Temporary Hoardings 188 PART 7 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING AND REVIEW 189 23.1 Park Management Monitoring and Reporting 189 23.2 Habitat and Species Monitoring 190 23.3 Review 190 23.4 Benchmarking and Third Party Review 191 APPENDICES 1 Bibliography 2 2008 Biodiversity Action Plan 3 Events Impact Assessment 4 LVRPA Landscape Management Plan 2014 – 2019 (Dec 2018) 5 Schedule of Paths and Surface Finishes 6 Schedule of Park Furniture and Signage 7 Schedule of Lighting 8 Art Installations Maintenance Requirements 9 Canal & River Trust Cycling Code of Conduct 10 Trees Disease Management and Phyto-sanitary Precautions and Management of Injurious and Invasive weeds 11 Tumbling Bay Playground: Report of Joint Assessment (Feb 2014) 12 Halo Turbines: Schedule of Activity (March 2012) 13 Lift Maintenance Schedules PLANS Section Plan 1 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Master Plan (2014) 1.2 Plan 2 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Phased Opening 1.3 Plan 3 Olympic Park Masterplan 2.2.2 Plan 4 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Context 3.1 Plan 5 Planning Application Boundaries 4.2 Plan 6 BAP Habitat Areas 6.1 Plan 7 North and South Park Strategic Views 8.5 Plan 8 North Park 1 in 100 Year Flood Risk Area 10.4 Plan 9 Canal and Waterways Network 11.4 Plan 10 North Park Boundary Railings 12.1 Plan 11 Road Hierarchy 12.2 Plan 12 Public Art Installations Location Plan 12.7 Plan 13 North Park 24 hr Access Routes 15.5 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park – Park Management Plan January 2019 Plan 14 Park Mobility Scheme 15.6 Plan 15 North Park Landscape Typologies 18 Plan 16 South Park Landscape Typologies 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Park Management Plan has been prepared by a consultant team led by Land Management Services Ltd, on behalf of the London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC). The consultant team comprised the following: Land Management Services Ltd Lead Consultant and Landscape Management Gary Grant Ecology Ecology and Biodiversity Action Plan ACS Consulting (London) Arboriculture Alan Baxter Integrated Design Engineering and Structures Hoare Lea Lighting and Electrical The consultant team reported to a LLDC Project Steering comprising: Mark Camley Executive Director Park Operations and Venues Michael Flanagan Interim Director of Park Operations Michael McDonnell Senior Project Manager Phil Askew Project Sponsor Parklands and Public Realm Stephen Gill Head of Estate and Facilities Management Derrick Spurr Interim Park Manager Vincent Bartlett Planning Peter Tudor Director of Venues Alistair Bayford Contract Manager (The Landscape Group) Adam Mayes Senior Operations Manager (Cofely Workplace) Jon Carney Lee Valley Regional Park Authority We would also like to acknowledge the assistance of the following in providing comments and assistance in the preparation of specific elements of the Park Management Plan: Canal & River Trust Environment Agency LDA Design Lee Valley Regional Park Authority London Legacy Development Corporation Natural England The January 2019 update has been prepared by Land Management Services Ltd with the support and assistance of Chris Moran , LLDC Park Services Manager and other LLDC, Engie and idVerde colleagues Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park – Park Management Plan January 2019 FRONTISPIECE “Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park will become a place unlike any other in the capital, a place that combines all the elements that make London the world’s greatest city: the beautiful open spaces, the architecture, the innovation, the quality, the creativity, the sense of fun and excitement.” Mayor of London “Lee Valley Regional Park Authority is committed to working closely with LLDC to ensure that complementary Park management regimes and a consistent visitor experience are delivered across the whole Park and to ensure that: the Park meets the dual needs of a park for regional and local communities and an iconic national and international destination provides an exemplar in sustainable parks, venues and open spaces management opportunities are provided for all individuals to benefit through enjoyment, participation, relaxation, employment, activities, sport, learning and training” Shaun Dawson (Chief Executive), Lee Valley Regional Park Authority 1 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park – Park Management Plan January 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park is the heart of the legacy which is emerging from the London 2012 Olympic Games.
Recommended publications
  • Sugar House Lane Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Proposals January 2010

    Sugar House Lane Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Proposals January 2010

    Sugar House Lane Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Proposals January 2010 London Borough of Newham CONTENTS PART 1: CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..2 The Planning Context……………………………………………………………….....4 Summary of Special Interest……………………………………………………….....6 Location and Context……………………………………………………………….....7 Topography and Landscape Setting… …………………………………………......7 Geology……………………………………...……………………………………........7 Historical Development…………………………………………………...................8 Townscape Analysis………………………………………………………………….12 Analysis of Key Buildings and Spaces………….………………………………….16 Negative Features and Issues………………………………………………………25 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………...…..26 PART 2: CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN A Vision for Sugar House Lane……………………..……….………………………27 Future Development…………………………………………………………………..28 Planning Controls……………………………………………………………………..29 Council Functions………………………………………..……………………………29 Enhancement and Funding…………………………………………………………..30 Community Engagement…………………………………………………………… 30 Public Realm……………………………………………………………….……….....30 Boundary Review……………………………………………………………………...31 Public Consultation and Monitoring…………………………………………….…...31 MAPS Sugar House Lane Conservation Area Boundary…………………………………..3 John Roque 1745………………………………………………………………………8 Ordnance Survey 1867………………………………………………………………..9 Ordnance Survey 1894…....................................................................................10 Views to and from Sugar House Lane………………………………………………13 Analysis
  • © Georgina Green ~ Epping Forest Though the Ages

    © Georgina Green ~ Epping Forest Though the Ages

    © Georgina Green ~ Epping Forest though the Ages Epping Forest Preface On 6th May 1882 Queen Victoria visited High Beach where she declared through the Ages "it gives me the greatest satisfaction to dedicate this beautiful Forest to the use and enjoyment of my people for all time" . This royal visit was greeted with great enthusiasm by the thousands of people who came to see their by Queen when she passed by, as their forefathers had done for other sovereigns down through the ages . Georgina Green My purpose in writing this little book is to tell how the ordinary people have used Epping Fo rest in the past, but came to enjoy it only in more recent times. I hope to give the reader a glimpse of what life was like for those who have lived here throughout the ages and how, by using the Forest, they have physically changed it over the centuries. The Romans, Saxons and Normans have each played their part, while the Forest we know today is one of the few surviving examples of Medieval woodland management. The Tudor monarchs and their courtiers frequently visited the Forest, wh ile in the 18th century the grandeur of Wanstead House attracted sight-seers from far and wide. The common people, meanwhile, were mostly poor farm labourers who were glad of the free produce they could obtain from the Forest. None of the Forest ponds are natural . some of them having been made accidentally when sand and gravel were extracted . while others were made by Man for a variety of reasons.
  • Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of

    Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of

    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Read, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-5130 (2017) Cinderella River: The evolving narrative of the River Lee. http://hydrocitizenship.com, London, pp. 1-163. [Book] Published version (with publisher’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/23299/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
  • Lee Valley Regional Park Strategic Planning Evidence and Policies

    Lee Valley Regional Park Strategic Planning Evidence and Policies

    Lee Valley Regional Park Authority Park Development Framework Strategic Policies April 2019 Lee Valley Regional Park Authority Park Development Framework Strategic Policies Prepared by LUC Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered in England Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Edinburgh Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Lancaster London NW1 1JD GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Executive Summary Extending north from East India Dock Basin for 26 miles, and broadly aligned with the natural course of the river Lea through east London and Essex to Ware in Hertfordshire, the Lee Valley Regional Park presents a rich tapestry of award winning international sports venues, attractive parklands and areas of significant ecological importance. The Park attracts over 7 million visits each year largely drawn from London, Hertfordshire and Essex but given the international status of its venues increasingly from across the United Kingdom and abroad. The Regional Park lies at the centre of one of Europe’s largest regeneration areas which includes London 2012 and its Legacy, major developments in the lower Lee Valley, Meridian Water and a range of large schemes coming forward in Epping Forest District and the Borough of Broxbourne. The Authority’s adopted policies date from 2000 and, given the Regional Park’s rapidly changing context, a new approach is required. The Strategic Aims and Policies, Landscape Strategy and Area Proposals included in the Park Development Framework are designed to respond to this changing context to ensure that the Regional Park can maintain its role as an exciting and dynamic destination which caters for leisure, recreation and the natural environment over the next 10-15 years.
  • Broxbourne Local Development Framework Core Strategy Submission December 2010

    Broxbourne Local Development Framework Core Strategy Submission December 2010

    Broxbourne Local Development Framework Core Strategy Submission December 2010 Town & Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 Regulation 27 Statement of Consultation Regulation 30 Statement of Representations Introduction 1. Regulation 27 of the Town & Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 states that proposed submission documents should include “(iv) a statement setting out (aa) which bodies and persons are invited to make representations under regulation 25, (bb) how those bodies and persons were invited to make such representations, (cc) a summary of the main issues raised by those representations and (dd) how those main issued have been addressed in the DPD.” 2. Regulation 30 of the Town & Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 states that submission documents should include “(e) a statement setting out (i) if representations were made in accordance with Regulation 28(2), the number of representations made and a summary of the main issues raised in those representations or (ii) that no such representations were made.” 3. This Statement therefore combines the requirements of Regulation 27 and Regulation 30 into a single document. Regulation 27 – Statement of Consultation 4. This section accords with Regulation 27 by identifying who the Council consulted at Key Issues and Preferred Options stages, by describing how those bodies and persons were invited to comment, by summarising the main issues that were raised and by explaining how these issues have been addressed in the Core Strategy Pre-Submission document. (aa) Which bodies and persons were invited to make representations 5. The Council’s Statement of Community Involvement was adopted in December 2006.
  • CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM to the BOARD [Redactions Below Relate to Commercially Confidential Information] REGENERATION REPORT – JANUARY 2010

    CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM to the BOARD [Redactions Below Relate to Commercially Confidential Information] REGENERATION REPORT – JANUARY 2010

    INFORMATION & DECISION REPORT BWB 3392 CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM TO THE BOARD [Redactions below relate to commercially confidential information] REGENERATION REPORT – JANUARY 2010 Report by Director of Regeneration 1. PURPOSE: 1.1 To update the Board on key regeneration activities across England and Wales 1.2 To seek Board approval to increase expenditure on Three Mills Lock project to £ [ ] (£ [ ] previously noted), to cover risk of additional costs being awarded against BW following Adjudication process. 2.0 NEW REGENERATION DIRECTORATE: 2.1 The new Regeneration Directorate is now fully operational. The transition of regeneration/external funding functions from the former Business Units into the four geographical teams has been a smooth process with project continuity and the need to maintain key external relationships being uppermost in our minds. 3.0 REGENERATION SECTOR COMMENTARY: 3.1 Regional Development Agencies: The future of the RDA’s continues to be debated with the Conservative’s seemingly backtracking on previous pledges to scrap them, in favour of a more flexible approach dependent on whether respective local authorities valued them or not. It is suggested that where LA’s might opt to remove a RDA, the agency would be replaced by a partnership of Councils around real economic regions. These Local Enterprise Partnerships would closely resemble the ‘Leeds City Region’ model although with a smaller number of councils – maybe seven to eight. The Labour Party has however reiterated its support for RDA’s stating recently that they would remain central to Govt plans for economic recovery. 3.2 Conservative Party Policy on Regeneration: The Tory green paper, which was expected to be published in the New Year, has been deferred.
  • Issues & Options Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA)

    Issues & Options Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA)

    LOCAL PLAN INTEGRATED IMPACT ASSESSMENT (IIA) Scoping report | Stage A Consultation Draft | February 2018 Contents Draft Local Plan Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA) Scoping Report .................................................................................................................. 1 Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Brent’s Local Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3. The Integrated Impact Assessment Approach ............................................................................................................................................ 16 4. Identifying relevant plans, programmes and policies ................................................................................................................................... 18 5. Key Sustainable Issues and Opportunities.................................................................................................................................................. 27 6. Developing the IIA framework ....................................................................................................................................................................
  • Lea Valley Cycleway Leaflet

    Lea Valley Cycleway Leaflet

    This map has been produced by Sustrans with the Part of the National Attractions along the route Contacts for further information Junction A support of the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority and This route is a partnership between Cycle Network 1 London Borough of Haringey. in London • Greenwich Foot Tunnel: The ride starts at the Greenwich Lee Valley Park Information Service • Maritime World Heritage site. Take a lift down to the foot Stubbins Hall Lane • tunnel and walk under the Thames. Lee Valley Regional Park Authority • Crooked Mile Watham Abbey British Waterways The Isle of Dogs and London Docklands: On the north • London Essex side you arrive on the Isle of Dogs, formerly the thriving London Borough of Tower Hamlets EN9 2EG • London dock area and now home to Canary Wharf tower London Borough of Hackney • and the largest urban farm in Europe - Mudchute Park Tel 01992 702200 Lee Valley Regional Park Docklands and Farm. [email protected] London Borough of Haringey • From the River Thames at East India Dock Basin to Ware in www.leevalleypark.org.uk Hertfordshire, the Lee Valley Regional Park provides leisure London Borough of Waltham Forest • and Lea Valley Mile End Park and Green Bridge: Crossing East India activities to suit all ages and tastes. Stretching 26 miles Sustrans • Dock Road you join the Regents Canal towpath and then Sustrans Information line along the banks of the River Lea, this 10,000-acre park has enter the exciting redeveloped Mile End Park. There is a 0845 113 0065 been shaped to provide a mosaic of countryside areas, green bridge over the busy Mile End Road where you can www.sustrans.org.uk urban green spaces, country parks, nature reserves and enjoy views of Canary Wharf.
  • Carpenters Road Lock Heritage from the Shadow of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park

    Carpenters Road Lock Heritage from the Shadow of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park

    Carpenters Road Lock Heritage from the shadow of the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Conservation Management Plan Florence Salberter Heritage Adviser Canal & River Trust May 2015 CONTENT 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and scope of the document 1.2 Authorship 2.0 Understanding the historic asset 2.1 Historic context: a changing waterscape 2.2 Carpenters Road Lock: Why the lock was built and how it works 2.2.1 A unique lock design 2.2.2 A 1930s project 2.2.3 Dual function: Flood protection and navigation 2.2.4 Hygienic improvement 2.3 The Olympics’ legacy and the lock restoration 2.3.1 Abandoned waterways: how the lock fell into disrepair and is being recovered as part of the Olympics’ Legacy 2.3.2 Parallels between Olympics led regeneration today and the regeneration scheme of the 1930s depression 3.0 Statement of Significance and conservation principles 3.1 A lock with dual functions in response to local conditions 3.2 Conservation principles 4.0 Vulnerability and Risks 4.1 Threats to the heritage 4.1.1 Funding shortage 4.1.2 Inappropriate design intervention 4.1.3 Lack of maintenance 4.2 Interpretation 4.2.1 Content quality 4.2.2 Design and Vandalism 4.2.3 Sharing of information 5.0 Conservation Management aims and objectives 5.1 Broad aims and objectives for safeguarding heritage significance 5.1.1 The Lock 5.1.2 Interpretation 5.2 Environmental Appraisal 5.3 Stakeholders’ engagement Carpenters Road Lock Conservation Plan Page 2 of 20 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope of the document This Conservation Management Plan has been prepared by the Canal & River Trust to support the second phase of the HLF Heritage Grant application to restore and interpret Carpenters Road Lock.
  • Ladbroke Grove, Restaurants

    Ladbroke Grove, Restaurants

    16_165454 bindex.qxp 10/16/07 2:09 PM Page 273 Index See also Accommodations and Restaurant indexes, below. GENERAL INDEX Art museums and galleries, Big Ben, 187 175–180 Big Bus Company, 193 Arts and crafts The Big Draw, 22, 174 Abbeys, 171, 188–189 classes and workshops, 219 Biking, 58, 211 Abney Park Cemetery & Nature shopping for, 225 Billy Elliot, 252 Reserve, 192, 208 Artsdepot, 250 Black Lion, 200 Accessorize, 232 ATMs, 15, 16, 63 Blood Brothers, 252 Accommodations, 65–98. See Aylesbury, 265–269 Bloody Tower (Tower of also Accommodations Index London), 153 near airports, 66–67 Bloomsbury, 50 best bets, 3–8 aby equipment, 59 accommodations, 74–75 Central London, 67–78 B Baby gifts, 238–239 restaurants, 110 Chatham, 271 Babygroove, 255 walking tour, 196–197 Chiltern Hills, 268 Baby Show London, 22 Bluewater Mall (Kent), 240 East London, 92–96 Babysitters, 59–60 Boating, 217, 218 North London, 96–98 Bakeries, 234 Boat trips and cruises, with pools, 8, 72 Balham, 53 180–181, 194 pricing, 66 accommodations, 89 Boveney Lock, 263 reservations, 66–67 restaurants, 131–133 canal, 180–181 south of the River, 86–92 Ballet, 212, 252, 255–256 the Continent, 35, 36 surfing for, 28 Ballooning, 213 Greenwich, 148, 150 tipping, 64 Bank of England Museum, 157 Herne Bay, 271 west of the Center, 78–86 Barbican Centre, 54, 243, 246 Windsor, 263 Whitstable, 271 Barrie, J. M., 37, 195–196, Books, recommended, 36–37 Windsor, 264–265 209–210 Bookstores, 225–226 youth hostels, 66, 90–91 Basketball, 258 story hours, 260 Addresses, finding an, 49 Battersea,
  • Bath Avon River Economy

    Bath Avon River Economy

    BATH AVON River Corridor Group BATH AVON RIVER ECONOMY FIRST REPORT OF BATH & NORTH EAST SOMERSET COUNCIL ADVISORY GROUP SUMMER 2011 Group Members The Bath Avon River Corridor Economy Advisory Group held its Inaugural Meeting in the Guildhall in Bath on 29th October 2010. Group members were nominated by Councillor Terry Gazzard or John Betty, Director of Development and Major Projects and North East Somerset Council, for their particular skills and relevant experience. Those present were: Michael Davis For experience in restoring the Kennet and Avon Canal Edward Nash For experience in urban regeneration and design management Jeremy Douch For experience in transport planning David Laming For experience in using the river for boating James Hurley Representing Low Carbon South West and for experience in resource efficiency Steve Tomlin For experience in reclamation of materials John Webb Representing Inland Waterways Association and the Kennet and Avon Canal Trust and experienced in Waterways management Nikki Wood For experience in water ecology Councillor Bryan Chalker For experience in Bath’s heritage and representing the Conservative Political Group Councillor Ian Gilchrist For experience in sustainability issues and representing the Liberal Democrats Political Group Melanie Birwe/ Tom Blackman For Bath and North East Somerset Council – liaison with Major Projects Office Steve Tomlin stood down in early 2011. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 9. The Role of the River in Flood Resilience 2. Executive Summary 10. Renewable Energy and Spatial Sustainability 3. The Problem and Its History 11. Creating Growth Points for Change a) The Geographic History b) The Challenges and Opportunities Now 12. Drivers of Economic Development c) The Regeneration Model • The Visitor Offer • University Sector 4.
  • LEA RIVER PARK PRIMER © Philip Vile LEA RIVER PARK PRIMER

    LEA RIVER PARK PRIMER © Philip Vile LEA RIVER PARK PRIMER

    LEA RIVER PARK PRIMER © Philip Vile LEA RIVER PARK PRIMER CONTENTS Welcome to the Park 4 Executive Summary 6 Introduction 8 Completing the Lee Valley Park 10 An Amazing Valley 12 The Context of the Lea Valley 14 The Six Parks and the Leaway 16 A Day Out in the Lea River Park 18 Curating the Valley 20 The Leaway 22 The Leaway - Overcoming Severance 24 Twelvetrees Crescent 26 Poplar Reach and Cody Dock 28 Canning Town Connections 30 Exotic Wild 32 Silvertown Viaduct 36 Future Phased Delivery 38 Conclusion 40 Published October 2016 WELCOME TO THE PARK The Lea River Park provides an exciting opportunity to invest in Newham’s wealth of natural resources in waterways and green spaces, in addition to the industrial and built heritage, to create an outstanding public space accessible to all who live and work in the borough. Our vision for the Lea River Park is for high quality, accessible parkland incorporating open space and waterways with new walking and cycling routes which will add to the decades of investment in transport infrastructure that have gone into the borough, enabling our community to be even better connected. Running through the spine of the borough’s key opportunity area, the park and improved connections will help to attract further investment into the borough whilst providing high quality leisure and recreational space to those who live and work here. With the scale of regeneration taking place in Newham, it makes us one of the most exciting places to visit in the UK. Sir Robin Wales Mayor of Newham Everybody recognises the Thames as the lifeblood of London.