DOCSLIB.ORG

Transforming Tottenham Hale Urban Centre Masterplan Supplementary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transforming Tottenham Hale Urban Centre Masterplan Supplementary ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Transforming Tottenham Hale Urban Centre Masterplan Supplementary Planning Document Schedule of Comments Received, London Borough of Haringey Responses and Changes October 2006 Contents Page No. Introduction 3 Summary of Representations, Responses & Changes 3 R. Pennyfather - Arriva 4 Dan Crandon – Hedgehog Construction 4 GA Ince – North London Ltd 6 AC Sideras – Dino & Sons Ltd 7 MA Polledri – Lee Valley Estates 7 Charles Everard - HTPCT 11 Ros Ward – London Borough of Barnet 11 Chris Price – Network Rail 12 Mark Matthews – Thames Water 12 Sean Bashforth – British Airport Authority (Stansted) 14 Tricia Lloyd – Environment Agency 14 Matthew Roe – Metropolitan Police 20 Dalton Warner Davis – Cannon Street Fabrics 21 Ian Runeckles - British Waterways 23 Dave Morris - HFRA 27 Matthew Bradby – Tottenham Civic Society 28 Quentin Given- THRASH 29 Moira Jenkins – Tottenham & Wood Green FoE 33 Dario Mazzola - FLAG 36 Phillipa Aitken - Hermes 37 Ray Ford – Stonebridge Boaters 38 Claire Martin - LVRPA 41 Greater London Authority 43 Transport for London 45 Councillor Lorna Reith – Tottenham Hale Ward 46 D Hammond – Countryside Agency 52 Phil England 53 Graham Saunders – English Heritage 59 Dee Odarley – British Airport Authority 60 Eric Owens - ISIS 61 Stephen Burgess – Milmead Industrial Mgt. 74 - 2 - Introduction This document forms part of the Tottenham Hale Urban Centre Masterplan which was adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) by the London Borough of Haringey, and should be read in conjunction with the Masterplan. The Masterplan defines the preferred form of development for Tottenham Hale in order to facilitate a comprehensive development that will provide new jobs and homes. It sets out the main policies, principles and parameters for development to achieve a defined vision. The principal objective is to provide clear planning guidance for regeneration and redevelopment of the Tottenham Hale area, which will help ensure that major planning applications meet the strategic goals that have been set for the area. The Masterplan was the subject of an extensive public consultation exercise. Given the volume of representations received it was considered expedient to produce this separate document. This schedule sets out the name of the respondent, a summary of the representations made, the London Borough of Haringey’s comments and any resulting amendments made to the Draft Masterplan. The schedule is publicly available and may be viewed on the London Borough of Haringey’s web site. Summary of Representations, Responses & Changes All responses in respect of the public consultation exercise were assessed and considered. Where appropriate, the Draft Tottenham Hale Urban Centre Masterplan was amended to reflect the consultation responses. Summaries of all the representations that were received, the London Borough of Haringey’s responses and the changes made to the Draft Masterplan are set out in the following schedule. - 3 - Name of Summary of representation(s) received Haringey Council’s comments Recommended changes respondent R Pennyfather – 1. New development will generate great deal of extra Detailed consideration of the impact No change Arriva London traffic on roads which are already badly congested – how has been undertaken during will this be handled? preparation of the masterplan. Transport assessments will be required to assess the impact of large developments on the local highway network. TfL is undertaking a separate study of the gyratory and considering a number of options. 2. New development will generate increased demand for TfL is responsible for specifying bus No change bus services – extra road traffic will have adverse impact service levels. The impact will be upon service delivery. minimised by existing and proposed priority measures. 3. Will the new interchange have enough space to provide The station interchange proposal is No change for additional services and will access be easier for the subject of a separate detailed buses? study. Provision of better bus access and integration between modes is a key requirement of the study 4. Would like better routing for service 192 so buses can This will be assessed as part of the No change depart Watermead Way without circuiting the gyratory. interchange study. Dan Crandon – 1. Would like to know long-term plans for Lockwood The Council has no immediate No change Hedgehog Constr. Industrial Park and how these might affect business. plans for Millmead and Lockwood estates, even though they are within the masterplan area. The purpose of the masterplan is to guide and control redevelopment of the area’s key sites in a coordinated manner, along with significant public realm - 4 - projects and infrastructure improvements. An application has been submitted for one of the key sites (GLS) which is in private ownership, and if developed, will undoubtedly have a knock-on effect upon Millmead and Lockwood. This natural progression could, in time, lead to an increase in land and building values, with improved facilities and infrastructure. It should be noted that Tottenham Hale is designated in the recently adopted UDP as a Defined Employment Area – Regeneration Area, which means it could be appropriate for comprehensive redevelopment or mixed-use. The fact that Millmead and Lockwood are within the masterplan boundary acknowledges they may be redeveloped in the longer-term, but permits additional planning control, and seeks to prevent any piecemeal redevelopment of the estates. 2. Wants to ensure business as a going concern and the See above No change freehold investment are taken care of. 3. Impact of additional traffic will need to be considered Agreed. The impact would be No change carefully, in particular its effect on efficiency of considered in detail as part of any businesses. site-specific planning application 4. Disagrees with description of ‘workspace shed’ (p21) as Agree. Replace with ‘workspace units’ it implies a temporary structure. - 5 - GA Ince – North 1. Hale Wharf – greater emphasis should be placed on The masterplan actually states No change London Ltd leisure, food, drink and hospitality activities, with provision ‘retail and leisure uses’ with the for pleasure craft to berth and use new facilities. potential for weekend arts and Comparison could be made with Birmingham’s Canal crafts / farmers markets and network. Do not consider significant retail could be outdoor café life. Additional retail supported. Do not consider a community centre would be will be supported by the new and viable. Development should provide an opportunity for existing local residents. BW has local artists and creative industries to showcase wares. submitted a planning application to berth four business barges, thereby limiting any additional mooring. If a community centre will only happen if viable. 2. GLS – should be a greater emphasis on office Acknowledged. There will be No change accommodation – site would be attractive for SMEs, which capacity for the creation of around will help support local daytime economy. 600 jobs at Hale Village. 3. Plan should support a substantial hotel (170+ beds) The plan supports the principle of a No change with banqueting and event facilities to support business hotel, however, too much detail is and visitors to the area. not appropriate. 4. Ashley Road – would like an expansion of employment The masterplan puts an emphasis No change and new workspace, with emphasis upon high-tech units on employment uses on the east which benefit from links to Stansted and Central London. side of Ashley Road 5. Station Interchange – Given its importance as gateway The Masterplan requires the No change into London, the new development should be iconic and interchange to be ‘state-of-the-art’ high-quality, reflecting the nature of the local area. and present a ‘high-quality image’. Commercial development should take account of the lack The masterplan should not be too of studio and media space in North London. A visitor prescriptive in terms of types of attraction which reflects the area’s connection with the commercial uses. Whilst a visitor history of media broadcast could be established, linking attraction is not a priority, it is not with development at Alexandra Palace. precluded. - 6 - 6. Retail Park – welcome plans for new shops along Ferry Acknowledged No change Lane and urge intensification. 7. High Cross Estate – plans accepted. Acknowledged No change AC Sideras - What provisions will be made for Millmead and Lockwood See Dan Crandon Comment 1 No change Dinos and Sons Industrial Estates in Draft Masterplan and what are Ltd. council’s intentions? MA Polledri – Lee 1. Lee Valley Estates is generally supportive of the Acknowledged No change. Valley Estates development of a sustainable community within a high- density, high-quality environment. The Masterplan’s vision is particularly strong in terms of: replacing the gyratory and improving the environment for cyclists and pedestrians; the importance of the public realm; active frontages and strong building lines creating a safe environment; improved permeability with east-west links; density and massing which supports mixed-use developments; new and existing public open space, with improved access to Lee Valley Regional Park and the importance of sustainable design and construction, setting Tottenham Hale as a benchmark for London. 2. Phasing – the order set-out in the Masterplan should Agree that GLS should be first, with Amend para 7.2.1 and fig 20 to recognise the former GLS site
Load more

Recommended publications
  • London National Park City Week 2018
    London National Park City Week 2018 Saturday 21 July – Sunday 29 July www.london.gov.uk/national-park-city-week Share your experiences using #NationalParkCity SATURDAY JULY 21 All day events InspiralLondon DayNight Trail Relay, 12 am – 12am Theme: Arts in Parks Meet at Kings Cross Square - Spindle Sculpture by Henry Moore - Start of InspiralLondon Metropolitan Trail, N1C 4DE (at midnight or join us along the route) Come and experience London as a National Park City day and night at this relay walk of InspiralLondon Metropolitan Trail. Join a team of artists and inspirallers as they walk non-stop for 48 hours to cover the first six parts of this 36- section walk. There are designated points where you can pick up the trail, with walks from one mile to eight miles plus. Visit InspiralLondon to find out more. The Crofton Park Railway Garden Sensory-Learning Themed Garden, 10am- 5:30pm Theme: Look & learn Crofton Park Railway Garden, Marnock Road, SE4 1AZ The railway garden opens its doors to showcase its plans for creating a 'sensory-learning' themed garden. Drop in at any time on the day to explore the garden, the landscaping plans, the various stalls or join one of the workshops. Free event, just turn up. Find out more on Crofton Park Railway Garden Brockley Tree Peaks Trail, 10am - 5:30pm Theme: Day walk & talk Crofton Park Railway Garden, Marnock Road, London, SE4 1AZ Collect your map and discount voucher before heading off to explore the wider Brockley area along a five-mile circular walk. The route will take you through the valley of the River Ravensbourne at Ladywell Fields and to the peaks of Blythe Hill Fields, Hilly Fields, One Tree Hill for the best views across London! You’ll find loads of great places to enjoy food and drink along the way and independent shops to explore (with some offering ten per cent for visitors on the day with your voucher).
    [Show full text]
  • © Georgina Green ~ Epping Forest Though the Ages
    © Georgina Green ~ Epping Forest though the Ages Epping Forest Preface On 6th May 1882 Queen Victoria visited High Beach where she declared through the Ages "it gives me the greatest satisfaction to dedicate this beautiful Forest to the use and enjoyment of my people for all time" . This royal visit was greeted with great enthusiasm by the thousands of people who came to see their by Queen when she passed by, as their forefathers had done for other sovereigns down through the ages . Georgina Green My purpose in writing this little book is to tell how the ordinary people have used Epping Fo rest in the past, but came to enjoy it only in more recent times. I hope to give the reader a glimpse of what life was like for those who have lived here throughout the ages and how, by using the Forest, they have physically changed it over the centuries. The Romans, Saxons and Normans have each played their part, while the Forest we know today is one of the few surviving examples of Medieval woodland management. The Tudor monarchs and their courtiers frequently visited the Forest, wh ile in the 18th century the grandeur of Wanstead House attracted sight-seers from far and wide. The common people, meanwhile, were mostly poor farm labourers who were glad of the free produce they could obtain from the Forest. None of the Forest ponds are natural . some of them having been made accidentally when sand and gravel were extracted . while others were made by Man for a variety of reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Read, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-5130 (2017) Cinderella River: The evolving narrative of the River Lee. http://hydrocitizenship.com, London, pp. 1-163. [Book] Published version (with publisher’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/23299/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Haringey
    London Borough of Haringey Contaminated Land Strategy RH Environmental August 2004 LB Haringey Contaminated Land Strategy August 2004 RH Environmental Cwmbychan Rhydlewis Llandysul Ceredigion SA44 5SB T: 01559 363836 E: [email protected] The LB Haringey Contaminated Land Strategy was revised and rewritten between November 2003 and August 2004 by RH Environmental, Environmental Health Consultants. Copyright: London Borough of Haringey 2004 2 LB Haringey Contaminated Land Strategy August 2004 Contents Contents Executive Summary Terms of Reference Management System Structure Contaminated Land Strategy and Management System Manual The Haringey Environment Management System Procedures Appendices 3 LB Haringey Contaminated Land Strategy August 2004 1.0 Executive Summary This Contaminated Land Strategy has been prepared for the Environmental Control Services of the London Borough of Haringey, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act 1990, (as amended by the Environment Act 1995). Under this legislation the Council is obliged to adopt and implement a contaminated land strategy. The Council is under a statutory duty to secure the remediation of contaminated land where significant harm is being, or could be caused to the environment, human health or to structures. The strategy relates to land contaminated by past activities only. The Council is the primary authority for the implementation of the strategy. It will consult with and take advice from other agencies, for example the Environment Agency, English Nature, English Heritage and the Greater London Authority. The strategy outlines the Councils’ approach to dealing with contaminated land within the borough. Procedures have been developed to identify responsibilities within the Council and to ensure the Council deals with land which is contaminated, in a consistent and diligent manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Valley Regional Park Strategic Planning Evidence and Policies
    Lee Valley Regional Park Authority Park Development Framework Strategic Policies April 2019 Lee Valley Regional Park Authority Park Development Framework Strategic Policies Prepared by LUC Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered in England Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Edinburgh Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Lancaster London NW1 1JD GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Executive Summary Extending north from East India Dock Basin for 26 miles, and broadly aligned with the natural course of the river Lea through east London and Essex to Ware in Hertfordshire, the Lee Valley Regional Park presents a rich tapestry of award winning international sports venues, attractive parklands and areas of significant ecological importance. The Park attracts over 7 million visits each year largely drawn from London, Hertfordshire and Essex but given the international status of its venues increasingly from across the United Kingdom and abroad. The Regional Park lies at the centre of one of Europe’s largest regeneration areas which includes London 2012 and its Legacy, major developments in the lower Lee Valley, Meridian Water and a range of large schemes coming forward in Epping Forest District and the Borough of Broxbourne. The Authority’s adopted policies date from 2000 and, given the Regional Park’s rapidly changing context, a new approach is required. The Strategic Aims and Policies, Landscape Strategy and Area Proposals included in the Park Development Framework are designed to respond to this changing context to ensure that the Regional Park can maintain its role as an exciting and dynamic destination which caters for leisure, recreation and the natural environment over the next 10-15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Broxbourne Local Development Framework Core Strategy Submission December 2010
    Broxbourne Local Development Framework Core Strategy Submission December 2010 Town & Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 Regulation 27 Statement of Consultation Regulation 30 Statement of Representations Introduction 1. Regulation 27 of the Town & Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 states that proposed submission documents should include “(iv) a statement setting out (aa) which bodies and persons are invited to make representations under regulation 25, (bb) how those bodies and persons were invited to make such representations, (cc) a summary of the main issues raised by those representations and (dd) how those main issued have been addressed in the DPD.” 2. Regulation 30 of the Town & Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 states that submission documents should include “(e) a statement setting out (i) if representations were made in accordance with Regulation 28(2), the number of representations made and a summary of the main issues raised in those representations or (ii) that no such representations were made.” 3. This Statement therefore combines the requirements of Regulation 27 and Regulation 30 into a single document. Regulation 27 – Statement of Consultation 4. This section accords with Regulation 27 by identifying who the Council consulted at Key Issues and Preferred Options stages, by describing how those bodies and persons were invited to comment, by summarising the main issues that were raised and by explaining how these issues have been addressed in the Core Strategy Pre-Submission document. (aa) Which bodies and persons were invited to make representations 5. The Council’s Statement of Community Involvement was adopted in December 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Character Assessment
    LCT C: Urban Valley Floor with Marshlands SPA, which provides a nationally important habitat for overwintering birds. Cultural Influences 4.64 The low-lying land of rich alluvial deposits supported a system of grazing, referred to as the Lammas system5 from the Anglo-Saxon period to the end of the C19th. Grazing rights on the marshes were extinguished by the early C20th and a substantial proportion of the marshlands, with the exception of Walthamstow Marshes, were then modified by industrial activities and landfill, including the dumping of bomb rubble after WW2. In the 1950 and 60s the construction of flood relief channels ended the periodic inundation of the marshlands. 4.65 Communication routes through the valley floor proliferated over the C20th, including pylons, roads and railway lines mounted on embankments, but residential and industrial development remains largely confined to the margins. 4.66 Public access and recreation now characterises much of the marshlands, with some areas managed as nature reserves. However substantial infrastructure, such as the railway lines and flood relief channels and adjacent industrial development, means access through and into the marshes from surrounding urban areas is often severed. The tow-path following the River Lee Navigation provides a continuous link along the valley for visitors to enjoy the landscape. 5 A system of grazing whereby cattle was grazed only after the cutting and collection of hay Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 85 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 86 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Occasional long views out to wooded valley sides between Residential properties overlooking the southern area across the riverside vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues & Options Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA)
    LOCAL PLAN INTEGRATED IMPACT ASSESSMENT (IIA) Scoping report | Stage A Consultation Draft | February 2018 Contents Draft Local Plan Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA) Scoping Report .................................................................................................................. 1 Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Brent’s Local Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3. The Integrated Impact Assessment Approach ............................................................................................................................................ 16 4. Identifying relevant plans, programmes and policies ................................................................................................................................... 18 5. Key Sustainable Issues and Opportunities.................................................................................................................................................. 27 6. Developing the IIA framework ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lea Valley Cycleway Leaflet
    This map has been produced by Sustrans with the Part of the National Attractions along the route Contacts for further information Junction A support of the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority and This route is a partnership between Cycle Network 1 London Borough of Haringey. in London • Greenwich Foot Tunnel: The ride starts at the Greenwich Lee Valley Park Information Service • Maritime World Heritage site. Take a lift down to the foot Stubbins Hall Lane • tunnel and walk under the Thames. Lee Valley Regional Park Authority • Crooked Mile Watham Abbey British Waterways The Isle of Dogs and London Docklands: On the north • London Essex side you arrive on the Isle of Dogs, formerly the thriving London Borough of Tower Hamlets EN9 2EG • London dock area and now home to Canary Wharf tower London Borough of Hackney • and the largest urban farm in Europe - Mudchute Park Tel 01992 702200 Lee Valley Regional Park Docklands and Farm. [email protected] London Borough of Haringey • From the River Thames at East India Dock Basin to Ware in www.leevalleypark.org.uk Hertfordshire, the Lee Valley Regional Park provides leisure London Borough of Waltham Forest • and Lea Valley Mile End Park and Green Bridge: Crossing East India activities to suit all ages and tastes. Stretching 26 miles Sustrans • Dock Road you join the Regents Canal towpath and then Sustrans Information line along the banks of the River Lea, this 10,000-acre park has enter the exciting redeveloped Mile End Park. There is a 0845 113 0065 been shaped to provide a mosaic of countryside areas, green bridge over the busy Mile End Road where you can www.sustrans.org.uk urban green spaces, country parks, nature reserves and enjoy views of Canary Wharf.
    [Show full text]
  • Ladbroke Grove, Restaurants
    16_165454 bindex.qxp 10/16/07 2:09 PM Page 273 Index See also Accommodations and Restaurant indexes, below. GENERAL INDEX Art museums and galleries, Big Ben, 187 175–180 Big Bus Company, 193 Arts and crafts The Big Draw, 22, 174 Abbeys, 171, 188–189 classes and workshops, 219 Biking, 58, 211 Abney Park Cemetery & Nature shopping for, 225 Billy Elliot, 252 Reserve, 192, 208 Artsdepot, 250 Black Lion, 200 Accessorize, 232 ATMs, 15, 16, 63 Blood Brothers, 252 Accommodations, 65–98. See Aylesbury, 265–269 Bloody Tower (Tower of also Accommodations Index London), 153 near airports, 66–67 Bloomsbury, 50 best bets, 3–8 aby equipment, 59 accommodations, 74–75 Central London, 67–78 B Baby gifts, 238–239 restaurants, 110 Chatham, 271 Babygroove, 255 walking tour, 196–197 Chiltern Hills, 268 Baby Show London, 22 Bluewater Mall (Kent), 240 East London, 92–96 Babysitters, 59–60 Boating, 217, 218 North London, 96–98 Bakeries, 234 Boat trips and cruises, with pools, 8, 72 Balham, 53 180–181, 194 pricing, 66 accommodations, 89 Boveney Lock, 263 reservations, 66–67 restaurants, 131–133 canal, 180–181 south of the River, 86–92 Ballet, 212, 252, 255–256 the Continent, 35, 36 surfing for, 28 Ballooning, 213 Greenwich, 148, 150 tipping, 64 Bank of England Museum, 157 Herne Bay, 271 west of the Center, 78–86 Barbican Centre, 54, 243, 246 Windsor, 263 Whitstable, 271 Barrie, J. M., 37, 195–196, Books, recommended, 36–37 Windsor, 264–265 209–210 Bookstores, 225–226 youth hostels, 66, 90–91 Basketball, 258 story hours, 260 Addresses, finding an, 49 Battersea,
    [Show full text]
  • LEA RIVER PARK PRIMER © Philip Vile LEA RIVER PARK PRIMER
    LEA RIVER PARK PRIMER © Philip Vile LEA RIVER PARK PRIMER CONTENTS Welcome to the Park 4 Executive Summary 6 Introduction 8 Completing the Lee Valley Park 10 An Amazing Valley 12 The Context of the Lea Valley 14 The Six Parks and the Leaway 16 A Day Out in the Lea River Park 18 Curating the Valley 20 The Leaway 22 The Leaway - Overcoming Severance 24 Twelvetrees Crescent 26 Poplar Reach and Cody Dock 28 Canning Town Connections 30 Exotic Wild 32 Silvertown Viaduct 36 Future Phased Delivery 38 Conclusion 40 Published October 2016 WELCOME TO THE PARK The Lea River Park provides an exciting opportunity to invest in Newham’s wealth of natural resources in waterways and green spaces, in addition to the industrial and built heritage, to create an outstanding public space accessible to all who live and work in the borough. Our vision for the Lea River Park is for high quality, accessible parkland incorporating open space and waterways with new walking and cycling routes which will add to the decades of investment in transport infrastructure that have gone into the borough, enabling our community to be even better connected. Running through the spine of the borough’s key opportunity area, the park and improved connections will help to attract further investment into the borough whilst providing high quality leisure and recreational space to those who live and work here. With the scale of regeneration taking place in Newham, it makes us one of the most exciting places to visit in the UK. Sir Robin Wales Mayor of Newham Everybody recognises the Thames as the lifeblood of London.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Minor Changes
    SECTION TITLE PAGE POLICY OR PROPOSED CHANGE REASON FOR CHANGE Ref Number NO/PAR BOX TITLE A NO INTRODUCTION 1.2 Haringey in London and north London 9/1.2.2 After Tottenham Hale delete ".", add "although currently there is only one train per hour, which limits the accessibility of Tottenham Hale to this part of east London". Clarification of wording recommended by the Greater 22/10/1.2 London Authority (GLA) 1.2 Haringey in London and north London 9/1.2.6 In first sentence replace 'planned' with 'expected' LBH amendment 22/11/1.2 1.2 Haringey in London and north London 9/1.2.6 In third sentence, replace 'which will have an' with 'with its' Clarification of wording recommended by the GLA. 22/11/1.2 1.2 Haringey in London and north London 11/1.2.11 Insert new sentence after last bullet point in 1.2.11 (to become 1.2.12) to read: Clarification of wording recommended by British Waterways. 5/1/1.2 "A Water Space Strategy is being carried out by British Waterways, to assist the NLSA in the delivery of an enhanced vision for the Upper Lee Valley. 1.3 Making Haringey Distinctive 14/1.3.1 Haringey's In bullet 2 under Haringey's economy insert "designated" before "employment land". Clarification of wording recommended by Haringey 26/3/1.3 economy Federation of Residents Association (HFRA) and AGRA 4/5/1.3 1.3 Making Haringey Distinctive 14/1.3.1 Haringey's Delete first bullet point and replace with: LBH amendment places "Haringey is an outer London borough which was created in 1965 by the amalgamation of three former boroughs; Tottenham, Wood Green and Hornsey" Delete the second bullet point and replace with: "The borough covers an area of more than 11 square miles.
    [Show full text]