Communications in Hostile Environments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Communications in Hostile Environments MilsatMagazine.com Satellite Communications for net-centric warfare January 2008 Vol. 1 No. 4 COMMUNICATIONS IN HOSTILE ENVIRONMENTS Plus Priority Briefing: Colonel David C. Uhrich Vice Commander, Military Satellite Communications Systems Wing CONTENTS MILSATMAGAZINE COVER STORY 30 Priority Briefing With Robert N. Canty 16 Satellite Communications For Late in November of 2007, Ray- Hostile Environments theon Company was awarded a US$160M, 18-month competi- by Dr. Axel Jahn, Managing Director, TriaGnoSys tive contract to develop a new Communication is central to managing situa- system design for the nexgen tions in any hostile environment, be such in the Global Positioning System Con- military sphere, in response to an emergency, or trol Segment. The U.S. Air Force when dealing with a major disaster. Must-haves Space and Missile Systems Cen- for communication solutions in hostile environ- ter awarded the contract. ments are reliability, robustness, security, porta- bility and ease of operation. 34 Antarctic Mission For Royal Navy Earlier this year, international satellite communications solution provider, NSSL, sponsored a crack team of Royal Navy personnel FEATURES from HMS Endurance, the Royal Navy’s Antarctic ice patrol ship, as they attempted to set a world record by kayaking around James 4 Priority Briefing With Colonel David C. Uhrich Ross Island, off the coast of Antarctica. “At the macro level, the [Military Satellite Com- munications Systems] Wing is responsible for wideband and protected MILSATCOM satel- lites, command and control systems, ground systems and terminals.” 13 Focus ON... MILSATCOM SYSTEMS WING by Hartley Lesser One element within the vast Space and Missile Systems Center 35 Focus ON... ADVANCED EXTREMELY is the U.S. Air Force’s Military Satellite Communications Systems HIGH FREQUENCY SYSTEM SATELLITE Wing, otherwise known as MCSW. SYSTEM (AEHF) The Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) System is a joint service satellite communications system providing global, secure, Vol. 1 No. 4 protected, and jam resistant communications for high-priority mili- tary ground, sea, and air assets. January 2008 20 Satellite Network Acceleration by Nick Yurin Once viewed as an ad hoc addition to the occasional Department of Defense (DoD) satellite network, accel- 37 Priority Briefing With Marc LeGare CEO, eration technologies are now an essential component in Proactive Communications, Inc. modern military satellite architecture. “I moved into the satellite communications busi- ness in 2003 after serving as a Battalion Com- mander for the U.S. military. In that role, I un- 23 Comms On The Move—Quit Stalling Around! derwent military communications training and by Karl Fuchs, Director of Federal gained hands-on experience with some of the most cutting edge digital battle command technology Systems Engineering, iDirect in the world. My battalion was the first digitized, Government Technologies mechanized infantry battalion in the US Army. ” Providing this high level of service poses some key technical challenges to satellite providers. 26 Military Satellites and Rockets—No More Failures! REGULAR DEPARMENTS by Dr. Len Losik, President, Failure Analysis Prognostics allows for the identification and re- 03 EDITOR’S LETTER pair or replacement of unreliable piece parts and 35 FEATURED SATELLITES electro-mechanical components at the factory or 39 MILITARY NEWS OF INTEREST on the launch pad, all prior to launch. As most of the equipment testing at the factory is designed to identify equipment that has failed, prognostics allows for reduced testing, shortening delivery schedules, and reducing labor hours. EDITOR’S LETTER I hope you have already availed youselves calendar for 2008 as well as our author’s of the gigantic, info-packed December guidelines… and they are just that, guide- MILSATMAGAZINE 2007 issue of SatMagazine, our YEAR IN lines. I look forward to hearing from you Production Team REVIEW issue. That particular issue of- regarding that. fered satcom and ancillary business ex- EDITORIAL pertise from those who know best—the This issue offers a superb lineup of ar- companies who successfully maintained ticles with a focus on the military side of Silvano Payne and sustained throughout 2007. In addi- satcom. Leading the article parade are Publisher tion, those fine folk also offering a look our three PRIORITY BRIEFINGS WITH… into this New Year, this 2008, and offered features. An interview with Colonel David Hartley Lesser their prognostications for a most inter- Uhrich, Vice Commander, Military Satel- Editorial Director esting read! The power of the experts is lite Communications System Wing of the [email protected] yours to read, digest and use in your daily Space and Missile Center at Los Ange- P.J. Waldt work at the SatMagazine website. les Air Force Base, leads the way. Robert Editor Canty, the Director of DoD Systems, of However, there’s even more company Space Systems, Raytheon, is our second Chris Forrester news that should be especially of value interview and he reviews his company’s Editor, Europe to our readers! Our publishing company’s contract for the nexgen Global Positioning creative director, Simon, has designed System Control Segment and other issues. Michael Fleck and created a complete magazine-on- Our third PRIORITY BRIEFINGS WITH of- Editor, Asia & Enterprise Markets a-website... no longer will you have to fers a follow-up interview with Marc Le download a “.pdf” file to read Milsat- Gare, the CEO of Proactive Communica- Martin Jarrold Magazine or SatMagazine. Simon has cre- tions Inc., and a veteran in every sense of Marketing Intelligence ated the code enabling our thousands the word within the satcom industry. of readers to approach and enjoy our CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS publications ONLINE in magazine format. Other superb content offerings include Incorporated into this online mix are easy Axel Jahn to use navigation buttons that’ll have you • Dr. Axel Jahn, the Managing Director of Tri- Nick Yurin cruising through feature articles, col- aGnoSys writes concerning Satellite Com- Karl Fuchs umns, news and more, quickly and eas- munications For Hostile Environments Len Losik ily. In fact, reading MilsatMagazine and • Satellite Network Acceleration by Nick Robert Canty Yurin, the Director of Sales and Market- SatMagazine is now similar to the way in Marc Le Gare ing for Global Protocols, Inc. which you’ve been reading our daily and • iDirect’s Karl Fuchs, the company’s Di- SALES weekly news at our news website. rector of Federal Systems Engineering, discusses Comms On The Move Jill Durfee We hope you enjoy the new online format • Dr. Len Losik, the founder of Failure Advertising Director and find the content stimulating, usable Analysis, reveals the whys-wherefores- [email protected] and pertinent to your work. Yes, you may and how-comes of failure prediction tech- continue to download the “.pdf”—we be- nology for military satellites and rockets PRODUCTION lieve you will find the new online format • A chilly case study involving a kayaking extremely easy to use, but it is always nice team from the Royal Navy in the Antarctic Simon Payne to have a choice—you can also print and/ • A military satellite focus on AEHF Creative Manager • In addition, of course, some news you or email each article directly from the can use. webpage, or forward the “.pdf” to associ- Published quarterly by ates. Your comments are always welcome. Satnews Publishers Thanks for joining us, once again, and 800 Siesta Way, Additionally, I wish to again offer my don’t forget to write… let us know your Sonoma, CA 95476 USA “open door” policy… if you wish to write a thoughts regarding our content, let me Phone (707) 939-9306 feature article, an op-ed piece, a spotlight, know if you wish to contribute, but most Fax (707) 939-9235 E-mail: [email protected] suggest an interview, send news or com- of all, my best wishes to each and every Website: www.milsatmagazine.com pany event information, please do so! Sim- one of you for a prosperous and happy © 2008 Satnews Publishers ply send an email to me so I may review NEW YEAR! your proposal and reply to you as soon as is possible. I would also be pleased to forward to any requestors our editorial January 2008 MILSATMAGAZINE.COM COLONEL DAVID C. UHRICH Vice Commander, Military Satellite Communications Systems Wing, Space and Missile Systems Center, Los Angeles Air Force Base, El Segundo, California by Hartley Lesser, Editorial Director, SatNews Publishers ed control systems. WGS will also provide a quantum leap in com- munications bandwidth for marines, soldiers, sailors and airmen. Hartley In fact, the first WGS satellite will provide more throughput than Good day, Colonel Uhrich. We are delighted you are able to take the the entire DSCS constellation combined. In addition, WGS will not time to help us understand the role of your command and the major only support X-band communications, but will also have 10 Ka military satellites systems the MILSATCOM Systems Wing (MCSW) de- antennas to support a wider variety of military communications velops, acquires and sustains. Can you tell us a little about the Wing? requirements. WGS’ digital channelizer will allow on-orbit cross banding between X and Ka-band users. Colonel Uhrich At the macro level, the Wing is responsible Both DSCS and WGS are wideband satellite communications systems. for wideband and protected MILSATCOM satellites, command and control systems, Hartley ground systems and terminals. These sys- What does the inclusion of the Ka antennas mean to the warfighter? tems operate in the Super High Frequency and Extremely High Frequency bands of the Colonel Uhrich electromagnetic spectrum. The U. S. Navy First, our Global Broadcast Service, which I’m sure we’ll talk has similar responsibilities for narrowband or Ultra High Fre- about later, will us WGS’ Ka capability to service to increase it’s quency communications satellites and systems. coverage area, which means more troops out in the field will have access to GBS.
Recommended publications
  • MSM Feb2020 Review2
    SATCOM for Net-Centric Warfare MilsatMagazineFebruary 2020 issue This issue... SMC: Year of Success Kratos: Countering Threats from Space Maxar: Leveraging Commercial Innovation WTA: Hacking the Hacker Dispatches United States Space Command Kratos Defense L3Harris Get SAT 2nd SOPS Orbit Communications Comtech EF Data Maxar Technologies Booz Allen Hamilton Raytheon Schriever AFB Cover image is courtesy of Kratos Defense and Security Cover SNIPE Ad Publishing Operations Features Silvano Payne, Publisher + Executive Writer Dispatches Simon Payne, Chief Technical Officer Hartley G. Lesser, Editorial Director United States Space Command .................................................................................4 Pattie Lesser, Executive Editor Kratos Defense & Security Solutions .........................................................................6 Donald McGee, Production Manager Andy Bernard, Sales Director L3Harris................................................................................................................7 + 9 Teresa Sanderson, Operations Director Get SAT .....................................................................................................................8 Sean Payne, Business Development Director Space & Missile Systems Center...............................................................................10 Dan Makinster, Technical Advisor 2nd SOPS .................................................................................................................11 Wendy Lewis, Contributing Editor
    [Show full text]
  • Unclassified Unclassified
    UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2020 Air Force Date: February 2019 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System PE 1206433F / Wideband Global SATCOM (SPACE) Development & Demonstration (SDD) Prior FY 2020 FY 2020 FY 2020 Cost To Total COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 Base OCO Total FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 Complete Cost Total Program Element - 6.535 3.970 1.920 0.000 1.920 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.973 0.000 15.398 657102: Command & Control - 4.011 3.970 1.920 0.000 1.920 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.973 0.000 12.874 Sys-Consolidated (CCS-C) 657107: WGS Space Systems - 2.524 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.524 Resiliency Upgrade A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Military Satellite Communications (MILSATCOM) Command and Control System-Consolidated (CCS-C) system provides integrated launch and on-orbit command and control (C2) functionality at Schriever AFB and Vandenberg AFB for MILSATCOM satellites. Schriever AFB is used for primary operations and Vandenberg AFB is used for backup operations. CCS-C uses modified commercial off the shelf hardware/software to control emerging and legacy MILSATCOM systems including Milstar, Defense Satellite Communications System (DSCS), Wideband Global SATCOM (WGS) and Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) satellites. The CCS-C project 657102 funds system architecture evolution to provide increased performance for additional satellites and to comply with DoD, Air Force, and Air Force Space Command (AFSPC)-directed standards for Information Assurance, Satellite Control Standardization, and Net-Readiness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Military Satellites
    The Market for Military Satellites Product Code #F678 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Space Systems Forecast - Satellites & Spacecraft Analysis 3 The Market for Military Satellites 2010 - 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................3 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................3 Competitive Environment.....................................................................................................................................13 Market Statistics .....................................................................................................................................................14 Table 1 - The Market for Military Satellites Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019 ................................................16 Table 2 - The Market for Military Satellites Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019.................................................19 Figure 1 - The Market for Military Satellites Unit Production 2010 - 2019 (Bar Graph) ...............................................................................22 Figure 2
    [Show full text]
  • Delta IV WGS-9 Mission Overview
    DELTA IV WGS-9 MISSION DELTA IV MEDIUM+ (5,4) A United Launch Alliance (ULA) Delta IV Medium+ (5,4) will deliver The Delta IV family of launch vehicles combines design simplicity, the ninth Wideband Global SATCOM (WGS) satellite to supersynchro- manufacturing efficiency, and streamlined mission and vehicle integration nous transfer orbit. Liftoff will occur from Space Launch Complex-37 to meet customer launch requirements. The Delta IV Medium+ (5,4) at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), FL. configuration has launched six WGS satellites. First Launch: Dec. 5, 2009 WGS-9, the third Block II follow-on satellite, supports communica- Launches to date: 6 tions links in the X-band and Ka-band spectra. While Block I and II satellites can instantaneously filter and downlink up to 4.410 GHz, Image courtesy of The Boeing Company Performance to GTO: 6,890 kg (15,109 lb) WGS-9 can filter and downlink up to 8.088 GHz of bandwidth. De- Performance to LEO-Reference: 13,370 kg (30,250 lb) pending on the mix of ground terminals, data rates and modulation and coding schemes employed, a single WGS satellite can support data transmission rates over 6 Gbps, and WGS-9 with its advanced digital channelizer may support over 11 Gbps. WGS has 19 independent coverage areas, 18 of which can be positioned throughout its field-of-view. This includes eight steerable/shapeable X-band beams formed by separate transmit/receive phased arrays; 10 Ka-band beams served by independently steerable diplexed antennas; and one transmit/ receive X-band Earth-coverage beam.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolved Expendable Launch Operations at Cape Canaveral, 2002-2009
    EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH OPERATIONS AT CAPE CANAVERAL 2002 – 2009 by Mark C. Cleary 45th SPACE WING History Office PREFACE This study addresses ATLAS V and DELTA IV Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) operations at Cape Canaveral, Florida. It features all the EELV missions launched from the Cape through the end of Calendar Year (CY) 2009. In addition, the first chapter provides an overview of the EELV effort in the 1990s, summaries of EELV contracts and requests for facilities at Cape Canaveral, deactivation and/or reconstruction of launch complexes 37 and 41 to support EELV operations, typical EELV flight profiles, and military supervision of EELV space operations. The lion’s share of this work highlights EELV launch campaigns and the outcome of each flight through the end of 2009. To avoid confusion, ATLAS V missions are presented in Chapter II, and DELTA IV missions appear in Chapter III. Furthermore, missions are placed in three categories within each chapter: 1) commercial, 2) civilian agency, and 3) military space operations. All EELV customers employ commercial launch contractors to put their respective payloads into orbit. Consequently, the type of agency sponsoring a payload (the Air Force, NASA, NOAA or a commercial satellite company) determines where its mission summary is placed. Range officials mark all launch times in Greenwich Mean Time, as indicated by a “Z” at various points in the narrative. Unfortunately, the convention creates a one-day discrepancy between the local date reported by the media and the “Z” time’s date whenever the launch occurs late at night, but before midnight. (This proved true for seven of the military ATLAS V and DELTA IV missions presented here.) In any event, competent authorities have reviewed all the material presented in this study, and it is releasable to the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Warfare and Defense by Chapman
    SPACE WARFARE AND DEFENSE www.abc-clio.com ABC-CLIO 1-800-368-6868 www.abc-clio.com ABC-CLIO 1-800-368-6868 SPACE WARFARE AND DEFENSE A Historical Encyclopedia and Research Guide BERT CHAPMAN Santa Barbara, California Denver, Colorado Oxford, England www.abc-clio.com ABC-CLIO 1-800-368-6868 Copyright 2008 by ABC-CLIO All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Cataloging-in-Publication Data is on file with the Library of Congress 12 11 10 09 08 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 This book is also available on the World Wide Web as an ebook. Visit www.abc-clio.com for details. ABC-CLIO, Inc. 130 Cremona Drive, P.O. Box 1911 Santa Barbara, California 93116–1911 Production Editor: Alisha Martinez Production Manager: Don Schmidt Media Manager: Caroline Price Media Editor: Julie Dunbar File Management Coordinator: Paula Gerard This book is printed on acid-free paper. Manufactured in the United States of America www.abc-clio.com ABC-CLIO 1-800-368-6868 To Becky, who personifies Proverbs 31:10. www.abc-clio.com ABC-CLIO 1-800-368-6868 www.abc-clio.com ABC-CLIO 1-800-368-6868 C ONTENTS Acknowledgements ix Introduction xi Chronology xv PART 1 1 Development of U.S. Military Space Policy 3 2 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Overview Slc-37
    SLC-37 MISSION OVERVIEW CCAFS, FL PMS 280C PMS 279C PMS 123C Black United Launch Alliance (ULA) is proud to be a part of the WGS-6 mission with the U.S. Air Force Space Command’s Space and Missile Systems Center (AFSPC/SMC). The WGS-6 mission marks the 23rd Delta IV launch and the fourth launch of the Delta IV Medium+ (5,4) launch vehicle configuration. This WGS mission is the sixth installment of the Wideband Global SATCOM (WGS) system. The WGS satellites are an important element of a new high- capacity satellite communications system providing enhanced communications capabilities to our troops in the field for the next decade and beyond. WGS enables more robust and flexible execution of Command and Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4lSR), as well as battle management and combat support information functions. The WGS constellation augments the existing service available through the UHF Follow-on satellite by providing enhanced information broadcast capabilities. The ULA team is focused on attaining Perfect Product Delivery for the WGS-6 mission, which includes a relentless focus on mission success (the perfect product) and also excellence and continuous improvement in meeting all of the needs of our customers (the perfect delivery).Mission Overview U.S. Airforce My thanks to the entire ULA team for its dedication in bringing WGS-6 to launch, and to the AFSPC/SMC for selecting Delta for this important mission. Go Delta, Go WGS! Jim Sponnick Vice President, Atlas and Delta Programs 1 Delta IV WGS-6 WGS-6 SATELLITE | Overview WGS supports communications links in the 500 MHz range of the X-band and 1 GHz range of the Ka-band spectra.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition of Space Systems, Volume 7: Past Problems and Future Challenges
    YOOL KIM, ELLIOT AXELBAND, ABBY DOLL, MEL EISMAN, MYRON HURA, EDWARD G. KEATING, MARTIN C. LIBICKI, BRADLEY MARTIN, MICHAEL E. MCMAHON, JERRY M. SOLLINGER, ERIN YORK, MARK V. A RENA, IRV BLICKSTEIN, WILLIAM SHELTON ACQUISITION OF SPACE SYSTEMS PAST PROBLEMS AND FUTURE CHALLENGES VOLUME 7 C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/MG1171z7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015933393 ISBN: 978-0-8330-8895-6 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2015 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover image: United Launch Alliance Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Space systems deliver critical capability to warfighters; thus, acquiring and deploying space systems in a timely and affordable manner is important to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment to the November 2007 Environmental Assessment for the Operation and Launch of the Falcon 1 and Falcon 9 Space Vehicles
    Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment to the November 2007 Environmental Assessment for the Operation and Launch of the Falcon 1 and Falcon 9 Space Vehicles at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Florida Prepared For Space Exploration Technologies Corporation El Segundo, California and 45th Space Wing Patrick Air Force Base, Florida August, 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SpaceX) has prepared this Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment (SEA) in concert with the United States Air Force (USAF) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts resulting from SpaceX operating and launching the Falcon 9 Block 2 vehicle, also referred to as Falcon 9 Version 1.1 (v1.1), from Launch Complex (LC) 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Florida. The SEA is needed because the Falcon 9 v1.1 is larger than, and produces a greater total thrust than the Falcon 9 Block 1. The USAF is the Lead Agency. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Office of Commercial Space Transportation will be a cooperating agency due to their launch licensing authority, and the National Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) will be a cooperating agency because of their space vehicle expertise and their possible future use of the Falcon 9 v1.1 vehicle. In November 2007, the Air Force published the Environmental Assessment for the Operation and Launch of the Falcon 1 and Falcon 9 Space Vehicles at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida (2007 EA) and in December 2007 issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). The 2007 EA analyzed the Air Force leasing land and facilities to SpaceX, as well as the required construction modification of the LC-40 facility, and the operation and launch for both Falcon 1 and Falcon 9 (Block 1) vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • China Dream, Space Dream: China's Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States
    China Dream, Space Dream 中国梦,航天梦China’s Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States A report prepared for the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Kevin Pollpeter Eric Anderson Jordan Wilson Fan Yang Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Dr. Patrick Besha and Dr. Scott Pace for reviewing a previous draft of this report. They would also like to thank Lynne Bush and Bret Silvis for their master editing skills. Of course, any errors or omissions are the fault of authors. Disclaimer: This research report was prepared at the request of the Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission's website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.-China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 108-7. However, it does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission or any individual Commissioner of the views or conclusions expressed in this commissioned research report. CONTENTS Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Geosynchrono
    ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Limited Distribution ! esoc European Space Operations Centre Robert-Bosch-Strasse 5 D-64293 Darmstadt Germany T +49 (0)6151 900 F +31 (0)6151 90495 www.esa.int TECHNICAL NOTE Classification of Geosynchronous objects. Prepared by ESA Space Debris Office Reference GEN-DB-LOG-00270-OPS-SD Issue/Revision 21.0 Date of Issue 19 July 2019 Status Issued ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Limited Distribution ! Page 2/234 Classification of Geosynchronous objects. Issue Date 19 July 2019 Ref GEN-DB-LOG-00270-OPS-SD ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Limited Distribution ! Abstract This is a status report on (near) geosynchronous objects as of 1 January 2019. Based on orbital data in ESA’s DISCOS database and on orbital data provided by KIAM the situation near the geostationary ring is analysed. From 1578 objects for which orbital data are available (of which 14 are outdated, i.e. the last available state dates back to 180 or more days before the reference date), 529 are actively controlled, 831 are drifting above, below or through GEO, 195 are in a libration orbit and 21 are in a highly inclined orbit. For 2 object the status could not be determined. Furthermore, there are 60 uncontrolled objects without orbital data (of which 55 have not been catalogued). Thus the total number of known objects in the geostationary region is 1638. Finally, there are 130 rocket bodies crossing GEO. If you detect any error or if you have any comment or question please contact: Stijn Lemmens European Space Agency European Space Operations Center Space Debris Office (OPS-GR) Robert-Bosch-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Security in Space: a Thirty-Year US Strategy
    APRIL 2021 The Future of Security in Space: A Thirty-Year US Strategy Lead Authors: Clementine G. Starling, Mark J. Massa, Lt Col Christopher P. Mulder, and Julia T. Siegel With a Foreword by Co-Chairs General James E. Cartwright, USMC (ret.) and Secretary Deborah Lee James In Collaboration with: Raphael Piliero Christopher J. MacArthur Brett M. Williamson Alexander Powell Hays Dor W. Brown IV Christian Trotti Ross Lott Olivia Popp The Future of Security in Space: A Thirty-Year US Strategy Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strategies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of nonpartisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. Forward Defense Forward Defense helps the United States and its allies and partners contend with great-power competitors and maintain favorable balances of power. This new practice area in the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security produces Forward-looking analyses of the trends, technologies, and concepts that will define the future of warfare, and the alliances needed for the 21st century. Through the futures we forecast, the scenarios we wargame, and the analyses we produce, Forward Defense develops actionable strategies and policies for deterrence and defense, while shaping US and allied operational concepts and the role of defense industry in addressing the most significant military challenges at the heart of great-power competition.
    [Show full text]