Quakers, Conciliation, and Gandhi
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Geoffrey Carnall. Gandhi's Interpreter: A Life of Horace Alexander. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010. xxi + 314 pp. $115.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-7486-4045-4. Reviewed by Surendra Bhana Published on H-Asia (May, 2012) Commissioned by Sumit Guha (The University of Texas at Austin) The Quaker connection with the Indian sub‐ War shocked him. The liberal ideology at Cam‐ continent goes back to the seventeenth century. bridge, where he was a student, also shaped his The frst Quaker came to India in 1657. Geoffrey ideas on internationalism. All of this would help Carnall, an honorary fellow at the University of him to develop a program on international rela‐ Edinburgh, has written a detailed account of one tions when he started teaching in 1919 at Wood‐ such individual, Horace Alexander (1889-1989), brooke, a Quaker college in Birmingham. who was deeply committed to peace and liberty in One of Alexander’s central ideas is encapsu‐ the twentieth century. The author makes copious lated in his 1920 statement, “Always our frst im‐ use of Alexander’s papers, his writings, and rele‐ pulse should be, not to destroy those whose ac‐ vant secondary literature. His many references to tions or opinions we disapprove, but to under‐ people, places, and events require careful track‐ stand their motives and their justification” (p. 44). ing of the chronology. Conciliation was the only way to reach permanent Born of Quaker stock on both sides of his fam‐ settlements. The League of Nations and later the ily, Alexander was deeply influenced by his fa‐ United Nations Organization were instruments to ther, who had been actively opposed to slavery achieve peace in the view of Alexander and other and the opium trade. From early on in his life, he Quakers. They showed concern with the violence began to develop interest in strategies that could inherent in Nazism, and never ceased to work for prevent violence. Robert Walpole’s art of secret peace, even after the Second World War began in diplomacy to end wars impressed him; and he 1939. In the 1960s and beyond, Alexander focused agreed with Norman Angell’s The Great Illusion on nuclear disarmament, the war in Vietnam, and (1909), which argued that wars made no rational other hot-spot issues. It is, however, his engage‐ sense in modern society, and were therefore less likely to happen. The outbreak of the First World H-Net Reviews ment with India in the 1920s through the 1950s his enormous popularity. Under these circum‐ that is the central focus of the book. stances, the British welcomed Alexander’s in‐ A tour of India in 1927 began a lifelong inter‐ sights although they did not always trust him. In‐ est in India. In the next two decades, Alexander deed, India Office officials disliked Quaker initia‐ would meet major leaders in the nationalist tives since they regarded people like Alexander as movement, including Mohandas K. Gandhi pro-Indian meddlers. (1869-1948), Jawaharlal Nehru (1889-1964), Ra‐ The role that Alexander and his associates bindranath Tagore (1861-1941), and others. His played in India’s negotiations was significant, es‐ earlier doubts about self-rule for the Indians dis‐ pecially during periods of crisis. Alexander usual‐ appeared, especially when he saw that many ly acquainted himself fully with details that British officials felt no obligation to work for their would help to move the talks along. When Gandhi welfare. Alexander would serve as mediator be‐ came to London for the Round Table Conference tween British officials (including the viceroy) in in 1933, Alexander helped with the press releases India and the nationalist leadership. The net‐ and the Friends’ House served as a venue for works he and other Quakers developed gave him Gandhi’s reception. The Quakers formed the India ready access to these individuals. Friends and ac‐ Conciliation Group (ICG) to help Indians with ur‐ quaintances from his university days were of gent social needs over a ten-year period from the great help. But Alexander’s own personality had a 1930s to the early 1940s. There was a serious po‐ lot to do with his influence. People trusted him, litical stalemate in 1942. Indians wanted indepen‐ and trusted what he brought to his role as a medi‐ dence immediately, but wartime prime minister ator. Winston Churchill (1874-1965) promised merely Gandhi liked the Quakers because they did to consider the issue after the war. Alexander saw not proselytize, and valued religious diversity. He Gandhi’s conciliatory side, and hoped that British was impressed by Alexander and his associate officials would take advantage of it. But they were Agatha Harrison (1885-1954), who, like him, be‐ determined to shut Gandhi out as long as he con‐ lieved that small steps could lead to major break‐ tinued to support the “Quit India” campaign dur‐ throughs. The meeting of minds between oppo‐ ing the war. The level of distrust between Indian nents was central to the tenets of Gandhi’s satya‐ leaders and the government of India prevented graha (truth force). Gandhi was personally warm joint endeavors when they were urgently needed, to Alexander. In one of his letters, he addressed as for example during the 1943 Bengal Famine. him as “my dear Horace” and ended with “love, The Friends Ambulance Unit was pleased, howev‐ bapu.” Alexander benefited from his association er, to work with local Indian leaders in the civil with Gandhi because the latter served as a role defense against threatened Japanese air raids. model. Gandhi, the author says towards the end of Alexander secured the help of H. S. Suhrawardy the book, inspired him to maintain his resolve (1892-1963), the powerful head of the Muslim even in bleak moments in “the creation of a League in Bengal. peaceful and ... sustainable world order” (p. 258). Prime Minister Clement Atlee (1883-1967) an‐ Gandhi accepted Alexander’s friendship. He rec‐ nounced on February 19, 1946 his willingness to ognized that Quakers like Alexander helped to ex‐ grant India independence. When the Simla negoti‐ plain India’s position to the British people since ations for India’s independence began, Alexander high-ranking Raj officials did not always under‐ and Harrison were present to counsel the British stand him or the nationalist movement. They un‐ about how to read Indian motives without being derestimated his resolve and were dismissive of cynical. They went back and forth to make points 2 H-Net Reviews informally, even if the atmosphere was compro‐ person who relaxed periodically by engaging in mised by severe political differences. Alexander his passionate hobby, bird-watching. advised “endless tact, patience, imagination, and The author refers to events and incidents courage” to Lord Pethick-Lawrence, the new sec‐ without providing their full historical context. If, retary of state for India (p. 191). The Muslim for example, the Quakers were expected to League insisted on the partition of British India. present a truer picture of the independence Its call for direct action sparked communal vio‐ movement, what was it that prevented a fairer as‐ lence between Hindus and Muslims in 1946, and sessment of Indian developments in the British the large-scale migration of people at partition press? There are references to events, major and was accompanied by horrific carnage. Victories minor, that needed fuller exploration of their sig‐ sometimes come in small doses, however. In Octo‐ nificance and how they impacted negotiations be‐ ber 1946, Gandhi went to Noakhali to end vio‐ tween the British and the Indians. What were the lence there. Alexander and Suhrawardy stayed parameters of the 1933 Round Table Conference with Gandhi in a Muslim home, and succeeded in and why did it fail? Events such as the declaration bringing a semblance of calm to the area. Alexan‐ of independence in January 1930, the 1930 Salt der remained in India until July 1951 at the Quak‐ March, the 1935 Government of India Act, or the er Center in New Delhi, and returned to Britain in Indian National Congress’s launch of the Quit In‐ 1953. dia movement had direct relevance to the course During the last years of his stay, Alexander in‐ of negotiations so central to Alexander’s endeav‐ terested himself in improving the lot of the ethnic ors. When Gandhi was released from prison in Nagas, relations between India and Pakistan, and May 1944, Alexander was irritated that he had other issues. He supported Prime Minister adopted a politically motivated stance rather than Nehru’s policy of nonalignment; and throughout focusing on alleviating poverty. The author should the 1950s and much of 1960s, remained active in have explained the context here. For one thing, London Yearly Meeting and the Meeting of Suffer‐ Gandhi’s entire "constructive program" was about ing. He wrote letters to the press regularly and eradicating poverty, and for another, it raises the published books. His last visit to India was in No‐ question of why a principled man would take vember 1971, when Bangladesh broke away from such a stand. In addition, Gandhi’s philosophy as Pakistan to become a new nation. The Indian gov‐ it related to brahmacharya (celibacy) and fasting ernment awarded him the Padma Bhushan Medal are two areas that require further analysis since in 1984, an honor reserved for people who had they are mentioned by the author. More recent distinguished themselves in the service of India. scholarship provides fresh insights on such issues. This is a detailed biography. Its focus on his If Alexander’s books and articles reflected a frm work, however, does not allow us to see the per‐ grasp of India and Gandhi’s ideas, this does not al‐ sonal side of Alexander’s life.