Sketch Comedy Writing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

SKETCH COMEDY WRITING COMEDY HANDBOOK HOMEPAGE Ending a sketch The most important part of any entertainment is the start. You want folks to continue to watch and/or listen. The second most important part is the end. What do audiences take away from what they just saw and/or heard? Closing Line A single line that wraps up the action often followed by a black out. No fanfare, but the scene and action end cleanly. Punch Line Quite simply, the answer to the joke of the sketch. A closing line you would expect a rim shot to follow. The Button A physical punch line, the scene’s final beat ends in a frozen moment in time, often with one or more players turning to the audience with a grin. Breath in all of the fun and feel a group lift. The Fade Away Life simply goes on. The scene continues in pantomime while lights fade out. In video maybe the camera zooms out or pans away. Cut away Commercial, PSA or other format that can have a person giving a disclaimer, more info, etc. In video you may simply have a slate of text. In live theater perhaps a single cast member steps forward “What you have just seen…”. Perhaps there is a narrator. Same old Thing? One of the biggest complaints sketches get are their horrible endings. Many famous TV shows are known for their lack of good sketch endings. Too often a sketch falls into the routine of a song on a radio, just fading away without a big finish. Many writers do their best not to do the same old thing. But when in doubt, the same old thing is better than nothing. Once you master the same old thing get creative and create original endings. As always learn from the successes AND failures of others. FRIENDLY ADVISE If the sketch is on the weak side DO NOT USE A FADE AWAY. A less than perfect sketch can benefit from a cliché Punch Line or Button. Nothing worse than a bad sketch with a weak ending! Too often you watch and think, did this writer just give up? Make a choice. A bad choice is better than no choice in comedy. If nothing else, we can learn from a bad choice. CLICK BACK BUTTON to return to previous page © 2011 SGF PRODUCTIONS www.fpny.org Authored by Walt Frasier www.waltfrasier.com .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Well Believes Critic
<curoeip-s., Nabel R. Cillis, 4 California State ' TE Sacramento 9, kiaRAR Senator Savs mors Sign SJS Troubles Spartan Daily I or ON ernight Aren't Unique San Jose State College Next Quarter Says Steel Woes V01.40 SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 1951, No. 53 To Install Booth Are Universal For Registratton San Jose State college "is in 1111 sign-up booth for the Senior the same boat with all of the other 1 (hernight to be held Jan. 11-13 educational institutions in the will he set-up during registration country," as far as the present at the end ol the steel shortage is conc.!' lied. United Min's gym. Cal States Senator William F. Know- Pitts. Overnight committee chalt- land said yesterday !nate announced sesterdav While addressing svnta Clara The iillItlal ellSt to, the, eve'. - county school superintendents on will he a $1 temporal.) ski and officials at the ( ounty 6 dub memhership and $3.77i tor School Department headquar- ters, he added that "the situa- 1 i hose students who will stay at tion is urgent in z alifornia." i he Ilm 'Oki lodge He stated that the -basic prob.) The first SO seniors to sign -lip tern" is that there is nce enough. %%ill Ire quartered at the ( at !ki steel being allocated for educa- lodge at a cost of hli tor the tional purposes. Basically, thi oeekentl. %%Mir the remaining problem will not be solved until 110 seniors o ill sto at the- 11..1,- 1 the defense authorities can Is. i jellei lodge tor 117.5.0.
[Show full text]
Sketch Idea Generator
Sketch Idea Generator This is a guide you can use to generate sketch ideas. Keep in mind that out of 10 ideas in comedy, maybe 1 is going to turn out great. But, using these methods you can pump out ideas very quickly and get to that 1 really great idea faster. Enjoy! Adjective/ Profession/ Location Mis/Matching This one is all about pumping out ideas quickly. Make 3 lists. First a list of adjectives. Second a list of professions. Third a list of locations. Then you just connect them in a way that makes sense or in a way that makes no sense at all. Here’s an example: Adjectives Professions Locations Loud A Barista Office Quiet B Librarian A Art Museum A Brave Actor B Truck Stop C Scared C Trash Collector Library Childish Singer Restaurant Smart Mechanic C Home Responsible Pope Grocery Store B If this were on sheet paper by hand I would just draw arrows (i suggest doing it that way). But, for the sake of keeping this digitally coherent, here are some connections I could make: A) Loud > Librarian > Art Museum B) Quiet > Actor > Grocery Store C) Scared > Mechanic > Truck Stop And so on… Then you look at your connections and you try to think of some situation that those make sense. Or you go the complete opposite and connect ones that are total rubbish to put together. For example, what if a librarian, who is forced to stay quiet in her natural environment (the library) made up for it by being loud everywhere else? Next, you would brainstorm that scenario.
[Show full text]
Ronnie Ray "Very Talented Comedian"
Ronnie Ray "Very Talented Comedian" Ronnie Ray has tremendous presence no matter what he does – Beth Lisick, The San Francisco Chronicle Originally from the south side of Chicago, Ronnie Ray’s passion in comedy transcribes into hilarious real life moments brought to the stage! Trained at The Second City Chicago Ron performs with sketch comedy ensemble Oui Be Negroes and Nation of Improv. As a stand-up comedian his material spans from a PG-13 to an R rating, with subjects that consist of growing up on the South Side of Chicago, the different types of comedians and the often requested crowd favorite that basketball star Shaquille O’Neal should retire from NBA and go back to his career as a rap artist. He his performed at a variety of clubs such as The World Famous Comedy Store (Hollywood), The Laugh Factory (Hollywood), The Improv (West Palm Beach) and Pechanga Comedy Club (Temecula) just to name a few and have been privileged to share the stage with comedy greats such as Damon Waynes, Chris Tucker and Robin Williams. His uniqueness as a comedic actor has given him the opportunity and distinction of being the only comic to perform on Playboy TV (Canoga Park and Totally Busted) AND Nickelodeon (Victorious) along with other T.V. and Movies projects. Such as Paramount Pictures “Save the Last Dance”, Groit Pictures “Redrum”, adding his voice to the Animation “Gangs of LA 1991_ and the award winning comedy from Jib Jab’s Shawshank in Minute, directed by John Landis. A gifted comedic writer, He has written numerous sketch comedy scenes of OBN and has written many spec productions with QRS Productions.
[Show full text]
+\Shu Dqg Plvxqghuvwdqglqj Lq Lqwhudfwlrqdo
1 +\SHUDQGPLVXQGHUVWDQGLQJLQLQWHUDFWLRQDOKXPRU Geert Brône University of Leuven Department of Linguistics Research Unit &UHDWLYLW\+XPRUDQG,PDJHU\LQ/DQJXDJH (CHIL) E-mail address: [email protected] $ ¢¡¤£¦¥¢§©¨ £ This paper explores two related types of interactional humor. The two phenomena under scrutiny, K\SHUXQGHUVWDQGLQJ and PLVXQGHUVWDQGLQJ, categorize as responsive conversational turns as they connect to a previously made utterance. Whereas hyper-understanding revolves around a speaker’s ability to exploit potential weak spots in a previous speaker’s utterance by playfully echoing that utterance while simultaneously reversing the initially intended interpretation, misunderstanding involves a genuine misinterpretation of a previous utterance by a character in the fictional world. Both cases, however, hinge on the differentiation of viewpoints, yielding a layered discourse representation. A corpus study based on the British television series %ODFNDGGHU reveals which pivot elements can serve as a trigger for hyper- and misunderstanding. Common to all instances, it is argued, is a mechanism ofILJXUHJURXQG UHYHUVDO. Key words: interactional humor, hyper-understanding, misunderstanding, layering, mental spaces, figure-ground reversal 2 ,QWURGXFWLRQ Recent studies in pragmatics (see e.g. Attardo 2003) have shown a renewed interest in humor as a valuable topic of interdisciplinary research. More specifically, these studies have extended the traditional focus of humor research on jokes to include longer narrative texts (Attardo 2001a, Triezenberg 2004) and conversational data (Boxer and Cortés-Conde 1997, Hay 2001, Kotthoff 2003, Norrick 2003, Antonopoulou and Sifianou 2003, Archakis and Tsakona 2005). New data from conversation analysis, text linguistics and discourse psychology present significant challenges to linguistic humor theories like the General Theory of Verbal Humor (Attardo 1994, 2001a), and call for (sometimes major) revisions.
[Show full text]
Stand-Up Comedy in Theory, Or, Abjection in America John Limon 6030 Limon / STAND up COMEDY / Sheet 1 of 160
Stand-up Comedy in Theory, or, Abjection in America John Limon Tseng 2000.4.3 18:27 6030 Limon / STAND UP COMEDY / sheet 1 of 160 Stand-up Comedy in Theory, or, Abjection in America 6030 Limon / STAND UP COMEDY / sheet 2 of 160 New Americanists A series edited by Donald E. Pease Tseng 2000.4.3 18:27 Tseng 2000.4.3 18:27 6030 Limon / STAND UP COMEDY / sheet 3 of 160 John Limon Duke University Press Stand-up Comedy in Theory, or, Abjection in America Durham and London 2000 6030 Limon / STAND UP COMEDY / sheet 4 of 160 The chapter ‘‘Analytic of the Ridiculous’’ is based on an essay that first appeared in Raritan: A Quarterly Review 14, no. 3 (winter 1997). The chapter ‘‘Journey to the End of the Night’’ is based on an essay that first appeared in Jx: A Journal in Culture and Criticism 1, no. 1 (autumn 1996). The chapter ‘‘Nectarines’’ is based on an essay that first appeared in the Yale Journal of Criticism 10, no. 1 (spring 1997). © 2000 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper ! Typeset in Melior by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. Tseng 2000.4.3 18:27 6030 Limon / STAND UP COMEDY / sheet 5 of 160 Contents Introduction. Approximations, Apologies, Acknowledgments 1 1. Inrage: A Lenny Bruce Joke and the Topography of Stand-Up 11 2. Nectarines: Carl Reiner and Mel Brooks 28 3.
[Show full text]
Women in Comedy
WOMEN IN COMEDY BACKGROUND: MAKERS: Women In Comedy tracks the rise of women in the world of comedy, from the “dangerous” comedy of 70s sitcoms like Norman Lear’s Maude to the groundbreaking women of the 1980s American comedy club boom and building to today’s multifaceted landscape. Today, movies like Bridesmaids break box office records and the women of Saturday Night Live are often more famous than their male counterparts, but it didn’t start out that way. Early breakout female comics had to keep their jokes within the safe context of marriage, motherhood, and a man’s world. But they still found a way to be subversive. As Joan Rivers puts it, “I was furious about having to get married… It all comes out on stage. So that’s what I do onstage. I really tell them the truth.” Soon comedy became a vehicle for women to take on some of the most sensitive and controversial issues of the day. On television in the 1960s, entertainers like Carol Burnett and Mary Tyler Moore illuminated the core issues of feminism with humor that was both sly and truthful. But it took a powerful male producer to bring the most provocative feminist characters onto the screen. Maude, who Lear introduced to audiences in 1971, was a feminist firebrand on her fourth husband, strong and independent with a razor sharp wit. “When Maude was on the air,” Lear tells us, “I used to get letters from the First Lady, Betty Ford…. And she always signed every letter ‘Maude’s #1 fan’.” When Maude chose to have an abortion at 47, religious groups protested, but the episode was watched by 65 million Americans.
[Show full text]
Humor in Language
Humor in Language Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics Humor in Language Salvatore Attardo Subject: Applied Linguistics, Cognitive Science, Pragmatics, Semantics, Sociolinguistics Online Publication Date: Mar 2017 DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.342 Summary and Keywords Interest in the linguistics of humor is widespread and dates since classical times. Several theoretical models have been proposed to describe and explain the function of humor in language. The most widely adopted one, the semantic-script theory of humor, was presented by Victor Raskin, in 1985. Its expansion, to incorporate a broader gamut of information, is known as the General Theory of Verbal Humor. Other approaches are emerging, especially in cognitive and corpus linguistics. Within applied linguistics, the predominant approach is analysis of conversation and discourse, with a focus on the disparate functions of humor in conversation. Speakers may use humor pro-socially, to build in-group solidarity, or anti-socially, to exclude and denigrate the targets of the humor. Most of the research has focused on how humor is co-constructed and used among friends, and how speakers support it. Increasingly, corpus-supported research is beginning to reshape the field, introducing quantitative concerns, as well as multimodal data and analyses. Overall, the linguistics of humor is a dynamic and rapidly changing field. Keywords: humor, smiling, laughter, irony, sarcasm, GTVH, joke, jab-line, punch line 1. Humor in Language Scholarly research on humor goes back to Plato and Aristotle and extends to practically all fields of inquiry, including mathematics and medicine. There exist several scholarly societies for the study of humor, and numerous journals and book series are dedicated entirely to humor research.
[Show full text]
Defamatory Humor and Incongruity's Promise
JUST A JOKE: DEFAMATORY HUMOR AND INCONGRUITY’S PROMISE LAURA E. LITTLE* Can’t take a joke, eh? A little levity is good for body, mind, and soul, y’know. Suing over THAT little schoolyard jab? I say you’re either “thin- skinned or a self-important prig . .”1 I. INTRODUCTION At what point does a joke become a legal wrong, justifying resort to defamation law? And at what point must a lawyer tell his or her client to steer clear of humor—or at least keep jokes focused exclusively on public figures, officials, and matters of clear public interest? The challenge of drawing the line between protecting and restricting humor has dogged United States courts for years. And what a difficult line it is to chart! First, the line must navigate a stark value clash: the right of individuals and groups to be free from attack on their property, dignity, and honor versus the right of individuals to free expression. To make matters more complicated—in fact, much more complicated—the line must not only account for, but also respect, the artistry of comedy and its beneficial contributions to society. In regulating defamation, American courts deploy a familiar concept for navigating the line between respecting humor and protecting individual * Copyright 2012 held by Laura E. Little, Professor of Law, Temple University’s Beasley School of Law; B.A. 1979, University of Pennsylvania; J.D. 1985 Temple University School of Law. I am grateful for the excellent research assistance of Theresa Hearn, Alice Ko, and Jacob Nemon, as well as the helpful comments of my colleague Professor Jaya Ramji-Nogales.
[Show full text]
Comedy Arts Concentration Guide Virtual Summer 2020 Program Description
COMEDY ARTS CONCENTRATION GUIDE VIRTUAL SUMMER 2020 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION We’re going digital and we’re excited! Why would we want to do comedy on the internet? Because never before have aspiring comedians had the same technical resources as the folks at SNL and The Second City! Here at DePaul’s Summer Program in Comedy Arts, we’re running with this opportunity and taking it straight online to push ourselves to create in new and innovative ways! The Comedy Arts concentration will prepare students to be highly adaptable multidisciplinary comedy creators. Students will build the knowledge and skills to perform, write, direct, and produce their own original comedy as individuals and an ensemble in a fun, fast-paced environment. Comedy always responds to the moment it exists in, so students will primarily focus on relevant practices and platforms in creating and producing digital comedy, equipping students with the ability to create and produce their own original content and share it across a broad array of platforms. We’re seizing the moment we’re in with a typical Chicago “Yes, And” attitude to see the unique opportunity at hand! Courses in improvisation, sketch comedy, and standup will anchor the program with additional workshops and masterclasses in special topics (and special instructors!). SAMPLE SCHEDULE (CENTRAL DAYLIGHT TIME) Includes daily writing/digital content assignments, viewing & reading assignments. MONDAY 11:00-1:00pm Improv 1:00-2:00pm Lunch w/ optional Zoom hangouts 2:00-4:00pm Sketch Comedy 4:00-5:00pm Tech Lab TUESDAY
[Show full text]
Immediacy in Comedy: How Gertrude Stein, Long Form Improv, and 5 Second Films Can Revolutionize the Comedic Form
University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2013 Immediacy In Comedy: How Gertrude Stein, Long Form Improv, And 5 Second Films Can Revolutionize The Comedic Form Alexander Hluch University of Central Florida Part of the Acting Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Hluch, Alexander, "Immediacy In Comedy: How Gertrude Stein, Long Form Improv, And 5 Second Films Can Revolutionize The Comedic Form" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2933. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2933 IMMEDIACY IN COMEDY: HOW GERTRUDE STEIN, LONG FORM IMPROV, AND 5 SECOND FILMS CAN REVOLUTIONIZE THE COMEDIC FORM by ALEX HLUCH M.A. in Theatre, Bowling Green State University, 2010 B.A. in Theatre, Ohio State University, 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Fine Arts in Acting in the department of Theatre in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2013 ABSTRACT Comedy has typically been derided as second-tier to drama in all aspects of narrative. Throughout history, comedy has seen short shrift in both critical reception and academic investigation. Merit is simply placed on drama far before that of comedy.
[Show full text]
Sketch Comedy 2019 Syllabus
THTR 470: Sketch Comedy for Theatre 2 Units Fall 2019—Mon/Wed—12-1:50pm Location: MCC 107 Instructor: Kirstin Eggers Office: MCC 214 Office Hours: By appointment — please schedule via email. Email: [email protected] Phone: (c) 323.898.7388 — emergencies only, email preferred. Course Description “The duty of comedy is to correct men by amusing them.” — Molière In this experiential writing and performance workshop course, students will explore and develop their unique comedic voices via the creation of comedic sketches, through the entire process — from idea generation, to writing, revision, rehearsal, and finally production and performance of a fully realized sketch comedy show, with an emphasis on creative collaboration and ensemble building. Learning Objectives Throughout this course, students will work to identify their own comedic viewpoints through the medium of sketch — comedic explorations of concepts, characters and situations. Students will learn sketch writing structure through the study of prominent existing sketches, and techniques for sketch performance and original character creation. Students are expected to generate a high volume of comedic concepts and written material to serve their own creative exploration, and their own work ethic and writing practice. Students are also expected to serve the needs of the group, and work toward building a true comedy ensemble. Although we will be working toward a final workshop presentation, this course is focused on process over product — you are not expected to be funny 100% of the time, or even 10% of the time. You are expected to be brave, be open- minded, and stretch out of your comfort zone to explore and strengthen your own unique comedic voice.
[Show full text]
Film 150: Screenwriting
PROVISIONAL SYLLABUS: Subject to Change – Film 150: Screenwriting Film 150 Screenwriting (M & F 1 - 5 pm) Natasha V. Summer Session 1: June 26 - July 28 [email protected] Class Location: Rm 141, Soc Sci 2 Office Hours: M/F noon - 1 b4 class Office Location: TBA And by appt (email request) This is an introductory course in which students learn some basic principles of screenwriting, in the context of a Sketch Comedy Workshop class. Emphasis this Summer is on Sketch Comedy Writing, and how Sketch differs from other types of comedy (Stand Up, Sitcoms, Comedic Feature Films, & Improv vs. Written Skits.) Telling jokes is how we critique and understand the world, ourselves, and other people. Having a funny idea, and wanting to share it, is a deeply human impulse. Your job, as screenwriters, is to learn to write your sketches in the funniest, most effective way possible for an audience. You want to move people to laughter so they can understand something new and unique about life. The main activity of this class is writing——you’ll write at least TEN short comedy sketches, ½ - 4 pages in length each. (“Brevity is the soul of wit” – W. Shakespeare.) We will be primarily concerned with STRUCTURE, CHARACTER, and HUMOR, as key components in sketch writing. We will analyze television sketch shows and your own scripts in terms of their structure, characters, and comedic effectiveness. Becoming a better writer is a journey, and we all learn by attempting things and growing beyond our limitations. We learn by WRITING, first and foremost. I will expect you to write MORE sketches than those you decide to present in class, and I expect you to revise your writing both before and after you present in class.
[Show full text]