The Human Microbiome: Your Own Personal Ecosystem

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Human Microbiome: Your Own Personal Ecosystem Developed by the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) to educate the general public about the benefits of fundamental biomedical research. INSIDEthis issue The Human Microbiome: Your Own Personal Ecosystem Animalcules 1 Germs 1 Cultural Variety 2 A Microbial Menagerie 3 A Blank Canvas 4 Stomach Bug 5 From Battlefield to Ecosystem 5 The Great Plate Count Anomaly and its Resolution 7 Unexpected Variety 8 Weighty Effects 9 The Human Microbiome Project 10 A Microbiome Success Story 12 A New Frontier 12 Acknowledgments The Human Microbiome: Your Own Personal Ecosystem Author, Jacqueline Jaeger Houtman, PhD Scientific Advisor, Sarah K. Highlander, PhD, J. Craig Venter Institute Scientific Reviewer, Karen Guillemin, PhD, University of Oregon BREAKTHROUGHS IN BIOSCIENCE COMMITTEE Paula H. Stern, PhD, Chair, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Aditi Bhargava, PhD, University of California San Francisco David L. Brautigan, PhD, University of Virginia School of Medicine Blanche Capel, PhD, Duke University Medical Center Rao L. Divi, PhD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Marnie Halpern, PhD, Carnegie Institution for Science Tony E. Hugli, PhD, Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies Edward R. B. McCabe, MD, PhD, March of Dimes Foundation Loraine Oman-Ganes, MD, FRCP(C), CCMG, FACMG, Sun Life Financial Sharma S. Prabhakar, MD, MBA, FACP, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center COVER: In 1964 René Dubos wrote: “Our recent studies have revealed that there exists in normal animals an R. Brooks Robey, MD, FASN, FAHA, White River Junction VA abundant and characteristic microflora, not only in the Medical Center and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth large intestine, but also in all the other parts of the digestive tract, including the mouth, the stomach and Scott I. Simon, PhD, University of California Davis the small intestine. These microorganisms should not be regarded merely as contaminants. Rather, they become so intimately associated with the various digestive organs BREAKTHROUGHS IN BIOSCIENCE that they form with them a well-defined ecosystem of PRODUCTION STAFF which each component is influenced by the others, and by the environmental conditions.” Dubos’s observations Managing Editor, Anne M. Deschamps, PhD, Senior Science as well as discoveries from other scientific disciplines Policy Analyst, FASEB Office of Public Affairs and advances in scientific technologies have allowed scientists to begin exploring the effects of our personal Production Staff, Lawrence Green, Communications Manager, ecosystem on health and disease. FASEB Office of Public Affairs Cover illustration: © Michael Linkinhoker, Link Studio, LLC The Human Microbiome: ECOSYSTEMYour Own Personal Ecosystem We are not alone. For each of the ten than-perfect oral hygiene, where he at the time infectious diseases were trillion human cells in our bodies, found “an unbelievably great company thought to be caused by poisonous there are ten microbial cells living in of living animalcules, a-swimming vapors, the influence of heavenly and on us. Our own cells encode about more nimbly than any I had ever seen bodies, and bad smells. 20,000 genes, but the sum total of up to this time.” He even described genes in our body is close to a billion. what seems to have been the intestinal Germs The vast majority of these are the pathogen Giardia lamblia from his Two centuries later, in France, Louis genes carried by microbes. own feces during a bout of diarrhea. Pasteur studied the organisms that For more than three hundred Leeuwenhoek reported in great depth ferment wine and beer (beneficial years, scientists have observed, on his findings with a sense of wonder organisms, to be sure). He determined that the “wrong” organisms could spoil identified, and implicated individual and curiosity. He made no connection the beverage. This led him to the idea microorganisms in specific diseases. between microbes and disease, since More recently, with a convergence that specific microbes could cause of scientific disciplines, an explosion diseases in humans. The germ theory of in technical capabilities and disease was further expanded by Robert revolutionary new ways of thinking, Koch, who was responsible for several we are exploring the organisms technical and conceptual innovations with which we share our bodies. that would make the modern science of The effects of these organisms—our microbiology possible. microbiome—on our health are only At the time, microbiologists grew just being recognized. bacteria in liquids such as meat broths. If more than one kind of organism Animalcules grew in the liquid, it was impossible The first person to observe to separate them. Koch, however, microorganisms associated with developed a way to obtain pure the human body was Antonie van cultures. At first, he used the surface Leeuwenhoek, a Dutch merchant in of sliced potatoes. Each of the small the seventeenth century. Although raised bumps that grew on the potato he did not invent the microscope, Figure 1 – Animalcules: surface was a colony of bacteria he was the first to construct devices Leeuwenhoek had boundless curiosity derived from a single organism. Koch with enough magnification and clarity and “whenever I found out anything began looking for a more suitable solid to see life forms as tiny as bacteria. remarkable, I have thought it my on which to grow bacteria. Initially, duty to put down my discovery on He described and drew pictures of paper, so that all ingenious people the best solution seemed to be gelatin, what he saw, including organisms might be informed thereof.” He used an animal protein, but it was not from the cleft in between his teeth his microscope to look at bacteria, without problems. For one thing, many and gum, where he observed “many protozoans, nematodes, sperm cells, bacteria consume gelatin, and those very little living animalcules, very blood cells, muscle fibers, yeast, algae, that caused disease in humans grew fleas, bees, aphids, diatoms, mineral prettily a-moving.” Not content with crystals, and fossils. best at human body temperature—the looking at the stuff in his own mouth, Image credit: © Ann Ronan Picture point at which gelatin melts. Even on he searched out family members and Library/Heritage Images/Imagestate very warm days, gelatin would turn neighbors, especially those with less- from solid to liquid. 1 Figure 2 – Robert Koch: Often Figure 3 – Angelina and Walther Hesse: Angelina helped Walther in the referred to as the founder of modern Koch laboratory as a technician. She also illustrated many of his publications. The bacteriology, Robert Koch developed agar she used in her jellies became the basis for the agar plates used in modern new ways of studying bacteria and microbiology laboratories. infectious diseases. He was awarded Image credit: National Library of Medicine the 1905 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine “for his investigations and discoveries in relation to tuberculosis.” Important as these technical Christian Gram introduced a stain Image credit: Science Photo Library innovations were, Koch’s conceptual that made bacteria easier to see under contribution was perhaps the most the microscope. It also turned some Walther Hesse, a scientist in Koch’s influential. Koch’s postulates were bacteria purple and some pink. This first lab, told his wife, Angelina, about the formulated to determine the microbial differential stain, based on structural gelatin problem. Angelina knew that cause of infectious disease. Using differences of the cell wall, is still used to her fruit jellies stayed solid throughout these rules, scientists could be sure the summer heat because she used that the organism in question was the agar-agar. First used in Japan in the perpetrator of pathogenesis and not 1600s, agar-agar (or agar) is derived just an innocent bystander. from seaweed and is sometimes used In 1876, Koch was the first to today as a vegetarian substitute for associate a particular disease, anthrax, gelatin. Unlike the protein gelatin, with a specific organism, Bacillus agar is a polysaccharide that is not anthracis. He also discovered the generally used by bacteria as food, microbial causes of tuberculosis and and it stays solid at temperatures used cholera. In the next thirty years, the to grow the cultures. bacteria that cause more than a dozen Staples in the modern microbiology diseases, from gonorrhea to dysentery lab, agar and the Petri dish (invented to whooping cough, were identified. Figure 4 – Petri dish with agar by Julius Petri in the Koch lab) made For a century, Koch’s postulates were and bacterial colonies: Using materials the gold standard for determining the and techniques first developed in Robert it easy to isolate and grow pure Koch’s lab, isolated colonies can be cause of infectious disease. cultures of bacteria descended from produced by diluting a culture in liquid a single cell. By diluting a liquid medium or on the plate itself until the culture, and then spreading it on Cultural Variety sample is dilute enough to separate individual cells, each of which grows agar in Petri dishes, bacteriologists At first, scientists could only tell one into a colony. could count the colonies and calculate kind of bacterium from another by Image credit: Alina Cardiae how many bacteria were in the their shape and ability to move around. Photography/Shutterstock original culture. In 1884, Danish bacteriologist Hans Breakthroughs in Bioscience 2 A GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA B GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA KOCH’S POSTULATES (i.e., Staphylococcus) (i.e., Escherichia coli) 1. The microorganism must be present in all cases of the disease. 2. The disease-causing organism (pathogen) can be isolated from the diseased host and grown in pure culture. 3. The pathogen from the pure culture must cause the Cell wall – peptidoglycan layer (retains crystal violet dye) disease when inoculated into a healthy, susceptible Cell wall Outer plasma laboratory animal. (crystal violet membrane dye is washed Peptidoglycan 4. The pathogen must be away) layer re-isolated from the new Inner plasma membrane host and shown to be (Lipid bilayer) the same as the originally inoculated organism.
Recommended publications
  • The Gut Microbiota and Inflammation
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review The Gut Microbiota and Inflammation: An Overview 1, 2 1, 1, , Zahraa Al Bander *, Marloes Dekker Nitert , Aya Mousa y and Negar Naderpoor * y 1 Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia; [email protected] 2 School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (Z.A.B.); [email protected] (N.N.); Tel.: +61-38-572-2896 (N.N.) These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 10 September 2020; Accepted: 15 October 2020; Published: 19 October 2020 Abstract: The gut microbiota encompasses a diverse community of bacteria that carry out various functions influencing the overall health of the host. These comprise nutrient metabolism, immune system regulation and natural defence against infection. The presence of certain bacteria is associated with inflammatory molecules that may bring about inflammation in various body tissues. Inflammation underlies many chronic multisystem conditions including obesity, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus and inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammation may be triggered by structural components of the bacteria which can result in a cascade of inflammatory pathways involving interleukins and other cytokines. Similarly, by-products of metabolic processes in bacteria, including some short-chain fatty acids, can play a role in inhibiting inflammatory processes. In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of the relationship between the gut microbiota and inflammatory molecules and to highlight relevant knowledge gaps in this field.
    [Show full text]
  • Infection and Immunity
    INFECTION AND IMMUNITY VOLUME 56 0 JANUARY 1988 0 NUMBER 1 J. W. Shands, Jr., Editor in Chief Dexter H. Howard, Editor (1991) (1989) University of California University ofFlorida, Gainesville Peter F. Bonventre, Editor (1989) Los Angeles, Calif. Phillip J. Baker, Editor (1990) University of Cincinnati Stephen H. Leppla, Editor (1991) National Institute ofAllergy and Cincinnati, Ohio U.S. Army Medical Research Institute Infectious Diseases Roy Curtiss III, Editor (1990) of Infectious Diseases Bethesda, Md. Washington University Frederick, Md. Edwin H. Beachey, Editor (1988) St. Louis, Mo. Stephan E. Mergenhagen, Editor (1989) VA Medical Center National Institute ofDental Research Memphis, Tenn. Bethesda, Md. EDITORIAL BOARD Julia Albright (1989) Stanley Falkow (1988) Jerry R. McGhee (1988) Charles F. Schachtele (1988) Leonard t. Altman (1989) Joseph Ferretti (1989) Floyd C. McIntire (1988) Julius Schachter (1989) Michael A. Apicella (1988) Richard A. Finkelstein (1989) John Mekalanos (1989) Patrick Schlievert (1990) Neil R. Baker (1989) Vincent A. Fischetti (1989) Jiri Mestecky (1989) June R. Scott (1990) Alan Barbour (1989) David FitzGerald (1989) Suzanne M. Michalek (1989) Philip Scott (1988) John B. Bartlett (1988) Robert Fitzgerald (1989) David C. Morrison (1989) Gerald D. Shockman (1989) Joel B. Baseman (1988) James D. Folds (1988) Steven Mosely (1990) W. A. Simpson (1988) Robert E. Baughn (1990) Peter Gemski (1988) Antony J. Mukkada (1990) Phillip D. Smith (1988) Gary K. Best (1988) Robert Genco (1988) Robert S. Munford (1989) Ralph Snyderman (1988) Jenefer Blackwell (1988) Ronald J. Gibbons (1988) Juneann W. Murphy (1990) Maggie So (1989) Arnold S. Bleiweis (1990) Jon Goguen (1989) H. Nikaido (1989) P. Frederick Sparling (1990) William H.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of the Human Microbiome and Proteus Mirabilis to Onset and Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Potential for Targeted Therapy
    Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice Volume 19 Number 3 Article 6 2021 Contribution of the Human Microbiome and Proteus mirabilis to Onset and Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Potential for Targeted Therapy Jessica Kerpez Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] Marc Kesselman Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] Michelle Demory Beckler Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ijahsp Part of the Genetic Phenomena Commons, Genetic Processes Commons, Immune System Diseases Commons, Medical Biochemistry Commons, and the Musculoskeletal Diseases Commons Recommended Citation Kerpez J, Kesselman M, Demory Beckler M. Contribution of the Human Microbiome and Proteus mirabilis to Onset and Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Potential for Targeted Therapy. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. 2021 Jan 01;19(3), Article 6. This Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Health Care Sciences at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice by an authorized editor of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Contribution of the Human Microbiome and Proteus mirabilis to Onset and Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Potential for Targeted Therapy Abstract The human microbiome has been shown to play a role in the regulation of human health, behavior, and disease. Data suggests that microorganisms that co-evolved within humans have an enhanced ability to prevent the development of a large spectrum of immune-related disorders but may also lead to the onset of conditions when homeostasis is disrupted.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Impact and Therapeutic Manipulation of the Gut Microbiome
    Review Health Impact and Therapeutic Manipulation of the Gut Microbiome Eric Banan-Mwine Daliri 1 , Fred Kwame Ofosu 1 , Ramachandran Chelliah 1, Byong Hoon Lee 2,3,* and Deog-Hwan Oh 1 1 Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea; [email protected] (E.B.-M.D.); [email protected] (F.K.O.); [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (D.-H.O.) 2 Department of Microbiology/Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada 3 SportBiomics, Sacramento Inc., Sacramento, CA 95660, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 24 March 2020; Accepted: 19 July 2020; Published: 29 July 2020 Abstract: Recent advances in microbiome studies have revealed much information about how the gut virome, mycobiome, and gut bacteria influence health and disease. Over the years, many studies have reported associations between the gut microflora under different pathological conditions. However, information about the role of gut metabolites and the mechanisms by which the gut microbiota affect health and disease does not provide enough evidence. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing and metabolomics coupled with large, randomized clinical trials are helping scientists to understand whether gut dysbiosis precedes pathology or gut dysbiosis is secondary to pathology. In this review, we discuss our current knowledge on the impact of gut bacteria, virome, and mycobiome interactions with the host and how they could be manipulated to promote health. Keywords: microbiome; biomarkers; personalized nutrition; microbes; metagenomics 1. Introduction The human body consists of mammalian cells and many microbial cells (bacteria, viruses, and fungi) which co-exist symbiotically.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Microbiome: Your Body Is an Ecosystem
    Human Microbiome: Your Body Is an Ecosystem This StepRead is based on an article provided by the American Museum of Natural History. What Is an Ecosystem? An ecosystem is a community of living things. The living things in an ecosystem interact with each other and with the non-living things around them. One example of an ecosystem is a forest. Every forest has a mix of living things, like plants and animals, and non-living things, like air, sunlight, rocks, and water. The mix of living and non-living things in each forest is unique. It is different from the mix of living and non-living things in any other ecosystem. You Are an Ecosystem The human body is also an ecosystem. There are trillions tiny organisms living in and on it. These organisms are known as microbes and include bacteria, viruses, and fungi. There are more of them living on just your skin right now than there are people on Earth. And there are a thousand times more than that in your gut! All the microbes in and on the human body form communities. The human body is an ecosystem. It is home to trillions of microbes. These communities are part of the ecosystem of the human Photo Credit: Gaby D’Alessandro/AMNH body. Together, all of these communities are known as the human microbiome. No two human microbiomes are the same. Because of this, you are a unique ecosystem. There is no other ecosystem like your body. Humans & Microbes Microbes have been around for more than 3.5 billion years.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis
    Author’s Accepted Manuscript Targeting the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: Prebiotics Have Anxiolytic and Antidepressant-like Effects and Reverse the Impact of Chronic Stress in Mice“Prebiotics for Stress-Related Disorders” Aurelijus Burokas, Silvia Arboleya, Rachel D. Moloney, Veronica L. Peterson, Kiera Murphy, Gerard Clarke, Catherine Stanton, Timothy G. www.elsevier.com/locate/journal Dinan, John F. Cryan PII: S0006-3223(17)30042-2 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.12.031 Reference: BPS13098 To appear in: Biological Psychiatry Cite this article as: Aurelijus Burokas, Silvia Arboleya, Rachel D. Moloney, Veronica L. Peterson, Kiera Murphy, Gerard Clarke, Catherine Stanton, Timothy G. Dinan and John F. Cryan, Targeting the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: Prebiotics Have Anxiolytic and Antidepressant-like Effects and Reverse the Impact of Chronic Stress in Mice“Prebiotics for Stress-Related Disorders”, Biological Psychiatry, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.12.031 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Targeting the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: Prebiotics Have Anxiolytic and Antidepressant-like Effects and Reverse the Impact of Chronic Stress in Mice Aurelijus Burokas1, Silvia Arboleya1,2*, Rachel D. Moloney1*, Veronica L.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Resistance and the Role of Vaccines
    PROGRAM ON THE GLOBAL DEMOGRAPHY OF AGING AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY Working Paper Series Antimicrobial Resistance and the Role of Vaccines David E. Bloom, Steven Black, David Salisbury, and Rino Rappuoli June 2019 PGDA Working Paper No. 170 http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/pgda/working/ Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P30AG024409. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. SPECIAL FEATURE: INTRODUCTION Antimicrobial resistance and the role of vaccines SPECIAL FEATURE: INTRODUCTION David E. Blooma, Steven Blackb, David Salisburyc, and Rino Rappuolid,e,1 Stanley Falkow (Fig. 1) dedicated his life’s work to being reported (6). These health consequences will the study of bacteria and infectious disease. He have damaging social and economic sequelae, such was a leader in the discovery of the mechanisms as lost productivity due to increased morbidity and of antibiotic resistance and among the first to mortality, and even social distancing, as fear of inter- recognize and raise the alarm about the problem of multidrug resistance. The articles of this Spe- personal contact grows. ’ cial Feature on Antimicrobial Resistance and the Although projections of AMR s future burden Role of Vaccines are dedicated to his memory depend on several assumptions and are therefore (Box 1). uncertain, the idea that the health and economic consequences of AMR will become significant is rea- Rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the sonable. In 2014, the Review on Antimicrobial Resis- greatest health challenges the world currently faces.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiology Immunology Cent
    years This booklet was created by Ashley T. Haase, MD, Regents Professor and Head of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, with invaluable input from current and former faculty, students, and staff. Acknowledgements to Colleen O’Neill, Department Administrator, for editorial and research assistance; the ASM Center for the History of Microbiology and Erik Moore, University Archivist, for historical documents and photos; and Ryan Kueser and the Medical School Office of Communications & Marketing, for design and production assistance. UMN Microbiology & Immunology 2019 Centennial Introduction CELEBRATING A CENTURY OF MICROBIOLOGY & IMMUNOLOGY This brief history captures the last half century from the last history and features foundational ideas and individuals who played prominent roles through their scientific contributions and leadership in microbiology and immunology at the University of Minnesota since the founding of the University in 1851. 1. UMN Microbiology & Immunology 2019 Centennial Microbiology at Minnesota MICROBIOLOGY AT MINNESOTA Microbiology at Minnesota has been From the beginning, faculty have studied distinguished from the beginning by the bacteria, viruses, and fungi relevant to breadth of the microorganisms studied important infectious diseases, from and by the disciplines and sub-disciplines early studies of diphtheria and rabies, represented in the research and teaching of through poliomyelitis, streptococcal and the faculty. The Microbiology Department staphylococcal infection to the present itself, as an integral part of the Medical day, HIV/AIDS and co-morbidities, TB and School since the department’s inception cryptococcal infections, and influenza. in 1918-1919, has been distinguished Beyond medical microbiology, veterinary too by its breadth, serving historically microbiology, microbial physiology, as the organizational center for all industrial microbiology, environmental microbiological teaching and research microbiology and ecology, microbial for the whole University.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from 3
    Philips et al. BMC Genomics (2020) 21:402 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06810-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Analysis of oral microbiome from fossil human remains revealed the significant differences in virulence factors of modern and ancient Tannerella forsythia Anna Philips1, Ireneusz Stolarek1, Luiza Handschuh1, Katarzyna Nowis1, Anna Juras2, Dawid Trzciński2, Wioletta Nowaczewska3, Anna Wrzesińska4, Jan Potempa5,6 and Marek Figlerowicz1,7* Abstract Background: Recent advances in the next-generation sequencing (NGS) allowed the metagenomic analyses of DNA from many different environments and sources, including thousands of years old skeletal remains. It has been shown that most of the DNA extracted from ancient samples is microbial. There are several reports demonstrating that the considerable fraction of extracted DNA belonged to the bacteria accompanying the studied individuals before their death. Results: In this study we scanned 344 microbiomes from 1000- and 2000- year-old human teeth. The datasets originated from our previous studies on human ancient DNA (aDNA) and on microbial DNA accompanying human remains. We previously noticed that in many samples infection-related species have been identified, among them Tannerella forsythia, one of the most prevalent oral human pathogens. Samples containing sufficient amount of T. forsythia aDNA for a complete genome assembly were selected for thorough analyses. We confirmed that the T. forsythia-containing samples have higher amounts of the periodontitis-associated species than the control samples. Despites, other pathogens-derived aDNA was found in the tested samples it was too fragmented and damaged to allow any reasonable reconstruction of these bacteria genomes. The anthropological examination of ancient skulls from which the T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Microbiome, Diet, and Health: Workshop Summary
    This PDF is available from The National Academies Press at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13522 The Human Microbiome, Diet, and Health: Workshop Summary ISBN Leslie Pray, Laura Pillsbury, and Emily Tomayko, Rapporteurs; Food 978-0-309-26585-0 Forum; Food and Nutrition Board; Institute of Medicine 181 pages 6 x 9 PAPERBACK (2013) Visit the National Academies Press online and register for... Instant access to free PDF downloads of titles from the NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL 10% off print titles Custom notification of new releases in your field of interest Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Request reprint permission for this book Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. The Human Microbiome, Diet, and Health: Workshop Summary Workshop Summary The Human Microbiome, Diet, and Health Leslie Pray, Laura Pillsbury, and Emily Tomayko, Rapporteurs Food Forum Food and Nutrition Board Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. The Human Microbiome, Diet, and Health: Workshop Summary THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Govern- ing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineer- ing, and the Institute of Medicine. This study was supported by Contract Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Skin Microbiome Analysis for Forensic Human Identification: What Do We Know So Far?
    microorganisms Review Skin Microbiome Analysis for Forensic Human Identification: What Do We Know So Far? Pamela Tozzo 1,*, Gabriella D’Angiolella 2 , Paola Brun 3, Ignazio Castagliuolo 3, Sarah Gino 4 and Luciana Caenazzo 1 1 Department of Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Molecular Medicine, Section of Microbiology, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy; [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (I.C.) 4 Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0498272234 Received: 11 May 2020; Accepted: 8 June 2020; Published: 9 June 2020 Abstract: Microbiome research is a highly transdisciplinary field with a wide range of applications and methods for studying it, involving different computational approaches and models. The fact that different people host radically different microbiota highlights forensic perspectives in understanding what leads to this variation and what regulates it, in order to effectively use microbes as forensic evidence. This narrative review provides an overview of some of the main scientific works so far produced, focusing on the potentiality of using skin microbiome profiling for human identification in forensics. This review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The examined literature clearly ascertains that skin microbial communities, although personalized, vary systematically across body sites and time, with intrapersonal differences over time smaller than interpersonal ones, showing such a high degree of spatial and temporal variability that the degree and nature of this variability can constitute in itself an important parameter useful in distinguishing individuals from one another.
    [Show full text]
  • The NIH Human Microbiome Project Authors: the NIH HMP Working Group (
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 5, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The NIH Human Microbiome Project Authors: the NIH HMP Working Group (http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/hmp/members.asp) ABSTRACT: The Human Microbiome Project ( HMP), funded as an initiative of the NIH Roadmap for Biomedical Research (http://nihroadmap.nih.gov), is a multi-component community resource. The goals of the HMP are (1) to take advantage of new, high-throughput technologies to characterize the human microbiome more fully by studying samples from multiple body sites from each of at least 250 “normal” volunteers; (2) to determine whether there are associations between changes in the microbiome and health/disease by studying several different medical conditions; and (3) to provide both a standardized data resource and new technological approaches to enable such studies to be undertaken broadly in the scientific community. The ethical, legal, and social implications of such research are being systematically studied as well. The ultimate objective of the HMP is to demonstrate that there are opportunities to improve human health through monitoring or manipulation of the human microbiome. The history and implementation of this new program are described here. INTRODUCTION: It has been known for some time that the human body is inhabited by at least ten times more bacteria than the number of human cells in the body, and that the majority of those bacteria are found in the human gastrointestinal tract (Savage 1977). Throughout the history of microbiology, most human studies have focused on the disease-causing organisms found on or in people; fewer studies have examined the benefits of the resident bacteria.
    [Show full text]