Geography of Long Island Sound

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Geography of Long Island Sound Long Island Sound is the second largest estuary on the east coast of the United States af- ter Chesapeake Bay. It was created 8000 years ago as the glaciers retreated and their meltwater filled the de- pressions behind the Harbor Hill moraine with fresh water. The Harbor Hill extends from Rhode Island to Nassau County. Remnants include the North Fork of Long Island, Plum Island, and Fishers Island. As sea level rose, the fresh water basins was flooded by the sea and turned salty. Technically, LIS stretches from the Battery (Manhattan) to The Race (islands between NY and RI). The East River (actually a strait between LIS and NY Harbor) did not exist as a western outlet until the rising sea flowed over the western divide. Today Long Island Sound has about 600 miles of coastline, is bordered by three states (NY, CT, and RI) and surrounded by over 20 million people. Over 90% of its fresh water comes from three south flowing rivers: the (1) Connecticut, (2) Housatonic, and (3) Thames. Its watershed includes much of New England (see map.) However, there is no major river to flush out LIS from west to east. There is limited ex- change of sea water at the eastern end and very little at the western end. It is shallow (65- 120 ft) with its eastern basin saltier than its western basin. Because of its physical characteristics, it has problems. Surrounded by one of the most densely populated urban-industrialized areas of the coun- try, it has seen the degradation of its habitats, both in water and coastal. Tidal wetlands have been lost to development. Shallow water with limited tidal and freshwater flushing has created dead zones. Hypoxia (low dissolved oxygen level from sewage and agricul- tural activities containing nitrogen), habitat degradation from pollution and contaminated bottom sediment with toxic chemicals and pathogens (bacteria and viruses) in water, have posed threats to sea life, birds and people. There is observable floatable debris. Poor water quality has hindered shoreline use on both coasts by people. Fisheries have suffered. Shellfish beds have been closed. ©AFG 10/10 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Inner Sound of Stroma, Pentland Firth (Scotland, UK)
3rd International Conference on Ocean Energy, 6 October, Bilbao An Operational Hydrodynamic Model of a key tidal-energy site: Inner Sound of Stroma, Pentland Firth (Scotland, UK) M.C. Easton 1, D.K. Woolf 1, and S. Pans 2 1 Environmental Research Institute North Highland College, UHI Millenium Institute Thurso, Caithness, KW14 7JD, Scotland Email: [email protected] 2 DHI Representative UK (Scotland) DHI Agern Allé 5, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark E-mail: [email protected] Abstract mutual influence of tidal ranges and phases between North Atlantic to the West and the North Sea to the As a result of significant progress towards the East act to setup strong currents [2] where spring tides delivery of tidal-stream power the industry is commonly exceed 5 ms-1 [3-4]. moving swiftly towards the deployment of pre- Seeking to capitalise on these unique conditions and commercial arrays. Meanwhile important sites, accelerate the delivery of large-scale tidal-stream such as the Pentland Firth, are being made available energy, in March 2010 the organisation controlling the for development. It is now crucial that we consider seabed in the United Kingdom, the Crown Estate, how the installation of tidal-stream devices will awarded leases for up to 600 MW of installed tidal interact with their host environment. Surveying energy capacity within the Pentland Firth-Orkney and modelling of the marine system prior to region [5]. An additional 200 MW is expected to be development is a prerequisite to identifying any awarded later in 2010 [6]. This announcement of the significant changes associated with tidal energy first large-scale deployment of tidal energy devices deployment.
[Show full text]
The Gulf of Mexico Workshop on International Research, March 29–30, 2017, Houston, Texas
OCS Study BOEM 2019-045 Proceedings: The Gulf of Mexico Workshop on International Research, March 29–30, 2017, Houston, Texas U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2019-045 Proceedings: The Gulf of Mexico Workshop on International Research, March 29–30, 2017, Houston, Texas Editors Larry McKinney, Mark Besonen, Kim Withers Prepared under BOEM Contract M16AC00026 by Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78412 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior New Orleans, LA Bureau of Ocean Energy Management July 2019 Gulf of Mexico OCS Region DISCLAIMER Study collaboration and funding were provided by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, under Agreement Number M16AC00026. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management website at https://www.boem.gov/Environmental-Studies-EnvData/, click on the link for the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS), and search on 2019-045. CITATION McKinney LD, Besonen M, Withers K (editors) (Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Corpus Christi, Texas).
[Show full text]
Sand Dunes Computer Animations and Paper Models by Tau Rho Alpha*, John P
Go Home U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Sand Dunes Computer animations and paper models By Tau Rho Alpha*, John P. Galloway*, and Scott W. Starratt* Open-file Report 98-131-A - This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this program has been used by the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS as to the accuracy and functioning of the program and related program material, nor shall the fact of distribution constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the USGS in connection therewith. * U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, CA 94025 Comments encouraged tralpha @ omega? .wr.usgs .gov [email protected] [email protected] (gobackward) <j (goforward) Description of Report This report illustrates, through computer animations and paper models, why sand dunes can develop different forms. By studying the animations and the paper models, students will better understand the evolution of sand dunes, Included in the paper and diskette versions of this report are templates for making a paper models, instructions for there assembly, and a discussion of development of different forms of sand dunes. In addition, the diskette version includes animations of how different sand dunes develop. Many people provided help and encouragement in the development of this HyperCard stack, particularly David M. Rubin, Maura Hogan and Sue Priest.
[Show full text]
Analysis of Boulder Distribution: Implications for Glacial Processes in the Vicinity of Wildwood State Park, Wading River, New York
Analysis of Boulder Distribution: Implications for Glacial Processes in the Vicinity of Wildwood State Park, Wading River, New York A Thesis Presented by Jessica Leigh McEachern to The Graduate School in Partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geosciences Stony Brook University December 2003 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Jessica Leigh McEachern We, the thesis committee for the above candidate for the Master of Science degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this thesis. ___________________________________ Dr. William E. Holt, Geosciences ___________________________________ Dr. Daniel M. Davis, Geosciences ___________________________________ Dr. Scott M. McLennan, Geosciences This thesis is accepted by the Graduate School _________________________________ Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Thesis Analysis of boulder distribution: implications for glacial processes in the vicinity of Wildwood State Park, Wading River, New York by Jessica Leigh McEachern in Geosciences Stony Brook University 2003 Wildwood State Park on Long Island’s north shore features many glacial erratics situated on the beach and throughout the park itself. Most of these boulders have been classified into three distinct lithologies: granite, granite gneiss, and basalt. The majority of granites and granite gneisses are comparable to those found in the Branford-Stony Creek Massif of southeastern Connecticut. The Branford-Stony Creek Massif is part of the Avalonian Terrane, which dips southward from southern Connecticut, underneath Long Island Sound and continuing underneath Long Island. I studied 647 boulders on the beach and 235 in the park. By using characteristics such as boulder roundness, the likely source area for these boulders is determined to be approximately 10 miles to the north, in Long Island Sound.
[Show full text]
Chapter 10. a First Look at Nunatsiavut Kangidualuk ('Fjord') Ecosystems
Chapter 10. A first look at Nunatsiavut Kangidualuk (‘fjord’) ecosystems Lead author Tanya Brown1,2,3, Ken Reimer3, Tom Sheldon4, Trevor Bell5 1Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; 2Institute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Sidney, BC; 3Environmental Sciences Group, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON; 4Nunatsiavut Government, Nain, NF; 5Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NF Contributing authors S. Bentley, R. Pienitz, M. Gosselin, M. Blais, M. Carpenter, E. Estrada, T. Richerol, E. Kahlmeyer, S. Luque, B. Sjare, A. Fisk, S. Iverson Abstract Long marine inlets that are classified as either fjords or fjards indent the Labrador coast. Along the moun- tainous north coast a classic fjord landscape dominates, with deep (up to ~300 m) muddy basins separated by rocky sills and flanked by high (up to 1,000 m), steep sidewalls. In contrast, the fjards of the central and southern coast are generally shallow (150 m), irregularly shaped inlets with gently sloping sidewalls and large intertidal zones. These fjords and fjards are important feeding grounds for marine mammals and seabirds and are commonly used by Inuit for hunting and travel. Despite their ecological and socio-cultural importance, these marine ecosystems are largely understudied. The Nunatsiavut Nuluak project has, as a primary goal, to undertake baseline inventories and comparative assessments of representative marine ecosystems in Labrador, including benthic and pelagic community composition, distribution and abun- dance, fjord processes, and oceanographic conditions. A case study demonstrating ecosystem resilience to anthropogenic disturbance is examined. This information provides a foundation for further research and monitoring as climate change and anthropogenic pressures alter recent baselines.
[Show full text]
Biodiversity and Ecological Potential of Plum Island, New York
Biodiversity and ecological potential of Plum Island, New York New York Natural Heritage Program i New York Natural Heritage Program The New York Natural Heritage Program The NY Natural Heritage Program is a partnership NY Natural Heritage has developed two notable between the NYS Department of Environmental online resources: Conservation Guides include the Conservation (NYS DEC) and The Nature Conservancy. biology, identification, habitat, and management of many Our mission is to facilitate conservation of rare animals, of New York’s rare species and natural community rare plants, and significant ecosystems. We accomplish this types; and NY Nature Explorer lists species and mission by combining thorough field inventories, scientific communities in a specified area of interest. analyses, expert interpretation, and the most comprehensive NY Natural Heritage also houses iMapInvasives, an database on New York's distinctive biodiversity to deliver online tool for invasive species reporting and data the highest quality information for natural resource management. planning, protection, and management. In 1990, NY Natural Heritage published Ecological NY Natural Heritage was established in 1985 and is a Communities of New York State, an all inclusive contract unit housed within NYS DEC’s Division of classification of natural and human-influenced Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources. The program is communities. From 40,000-acre beech-maple mesic staffed by more than 25 scientists and specialists with forests to 40-acre maritime beech forests, sea-level salt expertise in ecology, zoology, botany, information marshes to alpine meadows, our classification quickly management, and geographic information systems. became the primary source for natural community NY Natural Heritage maintains New York’s most classification in New York and a fundamental reference comprehensive database on the status and location of for natural community classifications in the northeastern rare species and natural communities.
[Show full text]
Section 4. County Profile
Section 4: County Profile Section 4. County Profile Profile information is presented and analyzed to develop an understanding of a study area, including the economic, structural, and population assets at risk and the particular concerns that may be present related to hazards analyzed later in this plan (e.g., significant coastal areas or low lying areas prone to flooding or a high percentage of vulnerable persons in an area). This profile describes the general information of the County (government, physical setting, population and demographics, general building stock, and land use and population trends) and critical facilities located within Suffolk County. 4.1 General Information Suffolk County was established on November 1, 1683, as one of the ten original counties in New York State. Suffolk County was named after the county of Suffolk in England, from where many of its earliest settlers originated (Suffolk County Department of Planning, 2005). Suffolk County’s western border is approximately 15 miles from the eastern border of New York City. According to the U.S. Census data, the Suffolk County estimated population in 2012 was 1,499,273. Suffolk County is one of the 57 counties in New York State and is comprised of 10 towns and 31 incorporated villages. Within each town and village, there are incorporated and unincorporated areas (Suffolk County Department of Planning, 2007). The population of Suffolk County is larger than ten states and ranks as the 24th most populated county in the country (U.S. Census Bureau, 2012). Suffolk County is bordered by Nassau County to the west and major water bodies to the north, south, and east.
[Show full text]
Restoring a Degraded Gulf of Mexico
April 2012 | Visit: www.NWF.org/oilspill Introduction Three years after the Deepwater Horizon disaster, this report gives a snapshot view of six wildlife species that depend on a healthy Gulf and the coastal wetlands that are critical to the Gulf’s food web. In August 2011, scientists did a comprehensive health examination of a 16-year-old male bottlenose dolphin. This dolphin—dubbed Y12 for research purposes—was caught near Grand Isle, a Louisiana barrier island that was oiled during the Gulf oil disaster.i Like many of the 31 other dolphins examined in the study, Y12 was found to be severely ill—underweight, anemic and with signs of liver and lung disease. The dolphins’ symptoms were consistent with those seen in other mammals exposed to oil; researchers feared many of the dolphins studied were so ill they would not survive.ii Seven months later, Y12’s emaciated carcass washed up on the beach at Grand Isle.iii Ecosystem-wide effects of the oil are suggested by the poor health of dolphins, which are at the top of the Gulf’s food chain. The same may be true of sea turtles, which also continue to die in alarmingly high numbers. More than 650 dolphins have been found stranded in the oil spill area since the Gulf oil disaster began. This is more than four times the historical average. Research shows that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) components of oil from the Macondo well were found in plankton even after the well was capped.iv, v PAHs can have carcinogenic, physiological and genetic effects.
[Show full text]
Cynthia Winings Gallery
ROAD WArrIOR Swept Away We interrupt this magazine for OM C O. C a live feed directly from the Secretary of Defense’s house. HELL; POLITI C IT BY COLIN W. SARGENT M uring the Reagan presidency, everyone on Earth knew that Secretary of De- fense Caspar Weinberger (1917-2006) MILY CARTER E D kept a getaway place up in Maine. But it was more something imagined than ac- tually seen. Far fewer knew where it was, or how luxuriant it was, or that it was once owned by Mary King Auchincloss. Listed for sale this sum- HE KOWLES COMPANY; T mer for $2.15M, “Windswept,” built in 1910, en- joys a classic view of Somes Sound on Mount FROM TOP: Desert Island. Positioned to advantage at 584 SUMMERGUIDE 2 0 1 6 1 4 7 A Chat With Caspar W. Weinberger, Jr. Caspar Willard Weinberger, Jr, known as “Cap,” is the son of Caspar Weinberger, prominent statesman and, most notably, U.S. Secretary of Defense under the Rea- gan administration from 1981 to 1987. Cap’s mother, Jane Weinberger, was an author and publisher from Milford, Maine. Born in 1947, Cap studied at Harvard–his father’s alma mater–and earned a B.A. in Modern British History in 1968. He lived in San Francisco for many years, working as an award-winning producer, director, and writer of documentary films for an NBC affiliate. Cap settled in Mount Desert in 1997. Today he is a writer and lecturer, as well as running Windswept House Publish- ers, started by his mother in 1984.
[Show full text]
Instructions for Use Model Overview This Booklet Is Valid for the Following Hearing Aid Families and Models
IIC-CIC-MIC-ITC-HS-FS Instructions for use Model overview This booklet is valid for the following hearing aid families and models: Oticon Alta Pro Oticon Nera Pro Oticon Ria Pro Oticon Alta Oticon Nera Oticon Ria IIC Invisible-In-the-Canal CIC Completely-In-the-Canal MIC Mostly-In-the-Canal ITC In-the-Canal HS Half-Shell FS Full Shell Introduction to this booklet Intended use This booklet guides you in how to use and maintain your new hearing The hearing aid is intended to amplify and transmit sound to the ear aid. Please read the booklet carefully including the Warning section. and thereby compensate for impaired hearing within mild to severe This will help you to achieve the full benefit of your new hearing aid. hearing loss. The hearing aid is not intended to be used by children younger than 36 months. Your hearing care professional has adjusted the hearing aid to meet your needs. If you have additional questions, please contact your hearing care professional. About Start up Handling Options Warnings More info For your convenience this booklet contains a navigation bar to help you navigate easily through the different sections. IMPORTANT NOTICE The hearing aid amplification is uniquely adjusted and optimised to your personal hearing capabilities during the hearing aid fitting performed by your hearing care professional. Table of content Replace O-Cap filter (hearing aids with 312 and 13 batteries) 29 Insert the hearing aid 30 About Remove the hearing aid 31 Identify your hearing aid style 8 Options Size 10 battery (CIC shown)
[Show full text]
SUBMARINE CANYONS : DISTRIBUTION and LONGITUDINAL PROFILES By
SUBMARINE CANYONS : DISTRIBUTION AND LONGITUDINAL PROFILES by Francis P. SHEPARD and Charles N. BEARD. (Reproduced from Geographical Review, New-York, July 1938, page 439). In the recent discussions of submarine canyons (1) there has been a tendency to base con clusions on the characteristics of selected examples, such as the canyons off Georges Bank, without much regard for the facts that the canyons are universal features and that they are associated with all kinds of conditions. Information on the distribution of many of the canyons has not been generally available, and there is practically no information regarding their longitu dinal profiles. In discussing these matters it seems advisable to take the opportunity of naming the canyons in order to facilitate future reference to them. BASIS FOR CANYON NAMES. In choosing names for the canyons (Table I) the Writers utilized practically all names used on charts and by earlier Writers such as Davidson (2) and H ull (3). In general, if a canyon heads towards a river mouth, the name of the river has been given to it. For other canyons the name of some shore feature or of a town in the vicinity Was used. However, there are a number of canyons whose heads are so far from the shore that it seemed unwise to name them after shore features. For these canyons names of vessels Were used, vessels being chosen that had played some part in the exploration of the canyons. In the lists in Table I the names of these canyons are underlined. One canyon off Georges Bank was named Georges Canyon because of its nearness to the dangerous Georges Shoal.
[Show full text]
The Prairie Peninsula (Physiographic Area 31) Partners in Flight Bird Conservation Plan for the Prairie Peninsula (Physiographic Area 31)
Partners in Flight Bird Conservation Plan for The Prairie Peninsula (Physiographic Area 31) Partners in Flight Bird Conservation Plan for The Prairie Peninsula (Physiographic Area 31) Version 1.0 4 February 2000 by Jane A. Fitzgerald, James R. Herkert and Jeffrey D. Brawn Please address comments to: Jane Fitzgerald PIF Midwest Regional Coordinator 8816 Manchester, suite 135 Brentwood, MO 63144 314-918-8505 e-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents: Executive Summary .......................................................1 Preface ................................................................3 Section 1: The planning unit Background .............................................................4 Conservation issues ........................................................4 General conservation opportunities .............................................8 Section 2: Avifaunal analysis General characteristics .....................................................9 Priority species .......................................................... 12 Section 3: Habitats and objectives Habitat-species suites ..................................................... 14 Grasslands ............................................................. 15 Ecology and conservation status ............................................ 15 Bird habitat requirements ................................................. 15 Population objectives and habitat strategies .................................... 20 Grassland conservation opportunities ........................................
[Show full text]