DOCSLIB.ORG

Alaska Peninsula

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alaska Peninsula DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOK BULLETIN 467 GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF PARTS OF THE ALASKA PENINSULA BY WALLACE W. ATWOOD WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 CONTENTS. Page. Preface, by Alfred H. Brooks ............................................. 7 Introduction............................................................. 9 Location and extent of area considered................................. 9 Previous explorations and surveys..................................... 9 Acknowledgments.........................................;.......... 12 Character of the country.................................................. 13 Geography........................................................... 13 Mountains....................................................... 1.3 Lowlands........................................ ................ 14 Coasts ........-........-....-.---..-----------..---....---.----.- 14 Drainage..................................-.------ -- -- --- ---- 15 Climate.............................................................. 15 Vegetation............................................................ 17 Settlement........................................................... 18 Commercial development.............................................. 19 Transportation .....................................................*.. 22 Geology ................................................................. 23 General features...................................................... 23 Age and succession of the rocks ................ .................... 23 Distribution of formations. ........................................ 26 Structure ........................................................ 27 Stratigraphy ..................................................... 29 Character and distribution of the rocks................................. 30 Argillite of unknown age.......................................... 30 Triassic system................................................... 30 Jurassic system................. .................................. 31 Lower Jurassic rocks......................................... 31 Granites and syenites, probably of Lower or Middle Jurassic age. 31 Middle Jurassic rocks ("Enochkin formation")................ 32 Upper Jurassic rocks.......................................... 33 Naknek formation........................................ 33 Cretaceous system................................................ 38 Lower Cretaceous rocks....................................... 38 Staniukovich shale....................................... 38 Herendeen limestone...................................... 39 Fauna..................................................... 39 Stratigraphic relations.................................... 40 Upper Cretaceous rocks. ........................................ 41 Chignik formation.................. _ ..............!..... 41 Tertiary system ................................................... 48 Basaltic flows, breccias, agglomerates, and tuffs of early Eocene age........................................................ 48 Eocene series .................................................. 49 Kenai formation.......................................... 49 Oligocene series (?)........................................... 59 Late Eocene or early Miocene andesites, tuffs, breccias, and glass. 59 4 . CONTENTS. Geology Continued ' Page. Character and distribution of the rocks Continued. Tertiary system Continued. Late Eocene or later igneous rocks............................. 63 Augite porphyry flow breccia.............................. 63 Dacites.................................................. 63 Diorite-porphyrite........................................ 65 Miocene series ... ........................................'... 66 Unga formation .......................................... 66 Post-Miocene basaltic flows and tuffs.......................... 69 Pliocene series (?).-...-...................................... 71 Summary of the igneous rocks................................. 71 Quaternary system ................................................ 73 Pleistocene deposits ....................... 1................... 73 Eecent deposits .............................................. 75 Geologic history........................................ .................. 76 Early Mesozoic time................................................... 77 Late Mesozoic time................................_.................. 78 Tertiary time ..:..................................................... 79 Quaternary time ...................................................... 81 Geomorphology.......................................................... 81 Means of interpretation............................................... 81 Eocene sedimentation and the growth of the Aleutian Range............ 82 Miocene erosion and possible planation ................................ 82 Deformation at the close of the Miocene............................... 83 Pliocene erosion................................ '.. ...............I..... -83 Glaciation .............................................I.........._.. 84 General effects................................................... 84 Glaciation of Unga Island..................................... .... 85 Glaciation of Popof Island......................................... 87 Glaciation of the Balboa-Herendeen Bay district................... 87 Glaciation of the Chignik Bay region .............................. 90 Retreat of the ice.................... 1............................ 91 Post-Pleistocene erosion .............................................. 92 Modern shore lines.-.................................;'................ 92 Recent changes in level............................................... 94 Summary of late geologic history....................................... 95 Mineral resources ........................................................ 95 Distribution of known mineral resources............................... 95 Coal................................................................. 96 Herendeen Bay coal field......................................... 96 Geography .................................................. 96 Areal extent.................................................. 97 Geology..........;............................................ 97 Stratigraphy............................................. 97 Structure................................................ 98 The coal measures............................................ 100 Character of the coal......: ........:.......................... 103 Physical properties.......................... 1............ 103 Combustion.............................................. 104 Chemical and calorimetric properties ...................... 104 Prospective mining conditions................................. 106 Position of the coal measures.. ........................... 106 Dip of the coal measures.................................. 106 Extent of the coal measures............................... 107 Shipment.................................................... 107 CONTENTS. 5 Mineral resources Continued. Pa&e. Coal Continued. Chignik Bay coalfield.........----.-.---....--.----....--......--. 108 Geography................................................... 108 Areal extent ................................................. 109 Geology .................... T ................................. 109 Stratigraphy............................................. 109 Structure ................................................ 109 The coal measures............................................ 110 Character of the coal .......................................... 114 Physical properties....................................... 114 _ Combustion.............................................. 115 Chemical and calorimetric properties ...................... 115 Prospective mining conditions................................. 115 Position of the coal measures.............................. 115 Dip and extent of the coal................................. 116 Shipment................................................ 116 Cold Harbor coal field............................................ 117 Geography .....................................i............ 117 Development work........................................... 117 Areal extent................................................. 118 Geology...................................................... 118 Character of the coal ................................. ........ 119 Prospective mining conditions................................. 4 120 Petroleum ........................................................... 120 Cold Bay oil field................................................. 120 Geography ...'............................................... 120 Geology ..................................................... 121 Stratigraphy............................................. 121 Structure................................................ 122 Indications of petroleum....................................... 122 Seepages..............................................;.. 122 Developments..............................'.'.............. 122 Character of the oil....................................... 123 Other possible petroleum fields.................................... 124 Gold..........................!..................................... 125 Popof Island...................................................... 125
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Handbook of Texas Cretaceous Fossils
    University of Texas Bulletin No. 2838: October 8, 1928 HANDBOOK OF TEXAS CRETACEOUS FOSSILS B y W. S. ADKINS Bureau of Economic Geology J. A. Udden, Director E. H. Sellards, Associate Director PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY FOUR TIMES A MONTH, AND ENTERED AS SECOND-CLASS MATTER AT THE POSTOFFICE AT AUSTIN, TEXAS. UNDER THE ACT OF AUGUST 24. 1912 The benefits of education and of useful knowledge, generally diffused through a community, are essential to the preservation of a free govern­ m en t. Sam Houston Cultivated mind is the guardian genius of democracy. It is the only dictator that freemen acknowl­ edge and the only security that free­ men desire. Mirabeau В. Lamar CONTENTS P age Introduction __________________________________________________ 5 Summary of Formation Nomenclature_______________________ 6 Zone Markers and Correlation_______________________________ 8 Types of Texas Cretaceous Fossils___________________________ 36 Bibliography ________________________________________________ 39 L ist and Description of Species_________________________________ 46 P lants ______________________________________________________ 46 Thallophytes ______________________________________________ 46 Fungi __________________________________________________ 46 Algae __________________________________________________ 47 Pteridophytes ____________________________________________ 47 Filices __________________________________________________ 47 Spermatophytes __________________________________________ 47 Gymnospermae _________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Classification of Rivers
    9.36 Geomorphic Classification of Rivers JM Buffington, U.S. Forest Service, Boise, ID, USA DR Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Published by Elsevier Inc. 9.36.1 Introduction 730 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification 730 9.36.3 Types of Channel Classification 731 9.36.3.1 Stream Order 731 9.36.3.2 Process Domains 732 9.36.3.3 Channel Pattern 732 9.36.3.4 Channel–Floodplain Interactions 735 9.36.3.5 Bed Material and Mobility 737 9.36.3.6 Channel Units 739 9.36.3.7 Hierarchical Classifications 739 9.36.3.8 Statistical Classifications 745 9.36.4 Use and Compatibility of Channel Classifications 745 9.36.5 The Rise and Fall of Classifications: Why Are Some Channel Classifications More Used Than Others? 747 9.36.6 Future Needs and Directions 753 9.36.6.1 Standardization and Sample Size 753 9.36.6.2 Remote Sensing 754 9.36.7 Conclusion 755 Acknowledgements 756 References 756 Appendix 762 9.36.1 Introduction 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification Over the last several decades, environmental legislation and a A basic tenet in geomorphology is that ‘form implies process.’As growing awareness of historical human disturbance to rivers such, numerous geomorphic classifications have been de- worldwide (Schumm, 1977; Collins et al., 2003; Surian and veloped for landscapes (Davis, 1899), hillslopes (Varnes, 1958), Rinaldi, 2003; Nilsson et al., 2005; Chin, 2006; Walter and and rivers (Section 9.36.3). The form–process paradigm is a Merritts, 2008) have fostered unprecedented collaboration potentially powerful tool for conducting quantitative geo- among scientists, land managers, and stakeholders to better morphic investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Maps of the Eastern Alaska Range, Alaska, (44 Quadrangles, 1:63360 Scale)
    Report of Investigations 2015-6 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units by Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner Southeastern Tanana Basin Southern Yukon–Tanana Upland and Terrane Delta River Granite Jarvis Mountain Aurora Peak Creek Terrane Hines Creek Fault Black Rapids Glacier Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane - Southern Yukon–Tanana Terrane Windy Terrane Denali Denali Fault Fault East Susitna Canwell Batholith Glacier Maclaren Glacier McCallum Creek- Metamorhic Belt Meteor Peak Slate Creek Thrust Broxson Gulch Fault Thrust Rainbow Mountain Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Phelan Delta Creek River Highway Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Published by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 2015 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner COVER: View toward the north across the eastern Alaska Range and into the southern Yukon–Tanana Upland highlighting geologic, structural, and geomorphic features. View is across the central Mount Hayes Quadrangle and is centered on the Delta River, Richardson Highway, and Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). Major geologic features, from south to north, are: (1) the Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane; (2) the Maclaren Terrane containing the Maclaren Glacier Metamorphic Belt to the south and the East Susitna Batholith to the north; (3) the Windy Terrane; (4) the Aurora Peak Terrane; and (5) the Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane of the Yukon–Tanana Terrane.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Pacific Island Coral Reef Fisheries by Tim Adams1, Paul Dalzell1 and Richard Farman2
    Status of Pacific Island coral reef fisheries by Tim Adams1, Paul Dalzell1 and Richard Farman2 1. SPC Coastal Fisheries Programme 2. Service de la mer, Province Sud, Nouméa, New Caledonia (paper presented at 8th International Coral Reef Symposium, Panama, 1996) Abstract It is difficult to determine the status of fisheries on Pacific Islands coral reefs. The region is economically undeveloped, sparsely populated and its coral reefs are scattered over a vast area. Resultant constraints on monitoring and investigation mean that quantitative information is rare. The few available quantitative indicators are summarised here alongside opinions based on extensive practical experience. Most anecdotal reports about exploitation of Pacific Island marine life that reach the global press concern adverse aspects of fisheries and this, in context with the definite crises being experienced in other global fisheries, particularly southeast Asian reef-fisheries, has led to a general feeling of pessimism about the broad impact of fishing on Pacific Island reefs. However, the available evidence suggests that Pacific Island reef fisheries as a whole do not exert an excessive pressure on reefs and that (high) local protein nutritional demands can be sustained at least for the immediate future. However, it is urgent that this apparent overall sustainability be consolidated through state-recognised management arrangements; it is necessary that some specific overfishing problems be addressed; and it is particularly important that the adverse influence of terrestrial activities and run-off on the carrying capacity of coral reefs fisheries be mitigated. Introduction Fisheries on Pacific Island coral reefs, despite the increasing pace of outside influence, are still overwhelmingly subsistence fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Sound of Stroma, Pentland Firth (Scotland, UK)
    3rd International Conference on Ocean Energy, 6 October, Bilbao An Operational Hydrodynamic Model of a key tidal-energy site: Inner Sound of Stroma, Pentland Firth (Scotland, UK) M.C. Easton 1, D.K. Woolf 1, and S. Pans 2 1 Environmental Research Institute North Highland College, UHI Millenium Institute Thurso, Caithness, KW14 7JD, Scotland Email: [email protected] 2 DHI Representative UK (Scotland) DHI Agern Allé 5, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark E-mail: [email protected] Abstract mutual influence of tidal ranges and phases between North Atlantic to the West and the North Sea to the As a result of significant progress towards the East act to setup strong currents [2] where spring tides delivery of tidal-stream power the industry is commonly exceed 5 ms-1 [3-4]. moving swiftly towards the deployment of pre- Seeking to capitalise on these unique conditions and commercial arrays. Meanwhile important sites, accelerate the delivery of large-scale tidal-stream such as the Pentland Firth, are being made available energy, in March 2010 the organisation controlling the for development. It is now crucial that we consider seabed in the United Kingdom, the Crown Estate, how the installation of tidal-stream devices will awarded leases for up to 600 MW of installed tidal interact with their host environment. Surveying energy capacity within the Pentland Firth-Orkney and modelling of the marine system prior to region [5]. An additional 200 MW is expected to be development is a prerequisite to identifying any awarded later in 2010 [6]. This announcement of the significant changes associated with tidal energy first large-scale deployment of tidal energy devices deployment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf of Mexico Workshop on International Research, March 29–30, 2017, Houston, Texas
    OCS Study BOEM 2019-045 Proceedings: The Gulf of Mexico Workshop on International Research, March 29–30, 2017, Houston, Texas U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2019-045 Proceedings: The Gulf of Mexico Workshop on International Research, March 29–30, 2017, Houston, Texas Editors Larry McKinney, Mark Besonen, Kim Withers Prepared under BOEM Contract M16AC00026 by Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78412 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior New Orleans, LA Bureau of Ocean Energy Management July 2019 Gulf of Mexico OCS Region DISCLAIMER Study collaboration and funding were provided by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, under Agreement Number M16AC00026. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management website at https://www.boem.gov/Environmental-Studies-EnvData/, click on the link for the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS), and search on 2019-045. CITATION McKinney LD, Besonen M, Withers K (editors) (Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Corpus Christi, Texas).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Protection Guidelines for Alaska
    Wildlife Protection Guidelines for Alaska Alaska Regional Response Team, Wildlife Protection Committee Revision 5 – August 2012 2018 Administrative Update Revision 5 – August 2012 Administrative Update: March 2018 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... G-5 A. Background G-5 B. Objectives ........................................................................................................................... G-5 C. Scope of Wildlife Protection Guidelines for Alaska ............................................................... G-6 1. Geographic Area ............................................................................................................. G-6 2. Wildlife Resources .......................................................................................................... G-8 3. Wildlife Resource Agencies ............................................................................................. G-8 D. Committee Organization and Development of Guidelines ................................................... G-8 1. Committee Organization ................................................................................................. G-8 2. Development of Guidelines ............................................................................................ G-9 E. Relationship to National Planning Requirements and Guidance .......................................... G-9 F. Procedures for Revisions and
    [Show full text]
  • Morphologic Characteristics of the Blow River Delta, Yukon Territory, Canada
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1969 Morphologic Characteristics of the Blow River Delta, Yukon Territory, Canada. James Murl Mccloy Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Mccloy, James Murl, "Morphologic Characteristics of the Blow River Delta, Yukon Territory, Canada." (1969). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1605. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1605 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 70-252 McCLOY, James Murl, 1934- MORPHOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BLOW RIVER DELTA, YUKON TERRITORY, CANADA. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1969 Geography University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Morphologic Characteristics of the Blow River Belta, Yukon Territory, Canada A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by James Murl McCloy B.A., State College at Los Angeles, 1961 May, 1969 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Research culminating in this dissertation was conducted under the auspices of the Arctic Institute of North America. The major portion of the financial support was received from the United States Army under contract no. BA-ARO-D-3I-I2I4.-G832, "Arctic Environmental Studies." Additional financial assistance during part of the writing stage was received in the form of a research assistantship from the Coastal Studies Institute, Louisi­ ana State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Acila (Truncacila) (Bivalvia: Nuculidae) from the Pacific Slope of North America
    THE VELIGER ᭧ CMS, Inc., 2006 The Veliger 48(2):83–104 (June 30, 2006) Cretaceous Acila (Truncacila) (Bivalvia: Nuculidae) from the Pacific Slope of North America RICHARD L. SQUIRES Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Northridge, California 91330-8266, USA AND LOUELLA R. SAUL Invertebrate Paleontology Section, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA Abstract. The Cretaceous record of the nuculid bivalve Acila (Truncacila) Grant & Gale, 1931, is established for the first time in the region extending from the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia, southward to Baja California, Mexico. Its record is represented by three previously named species, three new species, and one possible new species. The previously named species are reviewed and refined. The cumulative geologic range of all these species is Early Cretaceous (late Aptian) to Late Cretaceous (early late Maastrichtian), with the highest diversity (four species) occurring in the latest Campanian to early Maastrichtian. Acila (T.) allisoni, sp. nov., known only from upper Aptian strata of northern Baja California, Mexico, is one of the earliest confirmed records of this subgenus. ‘‘Aptian’’ reports of Trun- cacila in Tunisia, Morocco, and possibly eastern Venzeula need confirmation. Specimens of the study area Acila are most abundant in sandy, shallow-marine deposits that accumulated under warm- water conditions. Possible deeper water occurrences need critical evaluation. INTRODUCTION and Indo-Pacific regions and is a shallow-burrowing de- posit feeder. Like other nuculids, it lacks siphons but has This is the first detailed study of the Cretaceous record an anterior-to-posterior water current (Coan et al., 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Stratigraphic Architecture and Evolution of the Burdigalian Carbonate—Siliciclastic Sedimentary Systems of the Mut Basin, Turkey
    The stratigraphic architecture and evolution of the Burdigalian carbonate—siliciclastic sedimentary systems of the Mut Basin, Turkey P. Bassanta,*, F.S.P. Van Buchema, A. Strasserb,N.Gfru¨rc aInstitut Franc¸ais du Pe´trole, Rueil-Malmaison, France bUniversity of Fribourg, Switzerland cIstanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey Received 17 February 2003; received in revised form 18 November 2003; accepted 21 January 2004 Abstract This study describes the coeval development of the depositional environments in three areas across the Mut Basin (Southern Turkey) throughout the Late Burdigalian (early Miocene). Antecedent topography and rapid high-amplitude sea-level change are the main controlling factors on stratigraphic architecture and sediment type. Stratigraphic evidence is observed for two high- amplitude (100–150 m) sea-level cycles in the Late Burdigalian to Langhian. These cycles are interpreted to be eustatic in nature and driven by the long-term 400-Ka orbital eccentricity-cycle-changing ice volumes in the nascent Antarctic icecap. We propose that the Mut Basin is an exemplary case study area for guiding lithostratigraphic predictions in early Miocene shallow- marine carbonate and mixed environments elsewhere in the world. The Late Burdigalian in the Mut Basin was a time of relative tectonic quiescence, during which a complex relict basin topography was flooded by a rapid marine transgression. This area was chosen for study because it presents extraordinary large- scale 3D outcrops and a large diversity of depositional environments throughout the basin. Three study transects were constructed by combining stratal geometries and facies observations into a high-resolution sequence stratigraphic framework. 3346 m of section were logged, 400 thin sections were studied, and 145 biostratigraphic samples were analysed for nannoplankton dates (Bassant, P., 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Ocean Backyard –– Santa Cruz Sentinel Columns by Gary Griggs, Director, Institute of Marine Sciences, UC Santa Cruz
    Our Ocean Backyard –– Santa Cruz Sentinel columns by Gary Griggs, Director, Institute of Marine Sciences, UC Santa Cruz. #45 January 2, 2010 Why Monterey Submarine Canyon? Monterey Submarine Canyon forms a deep gash beneath the waters of Monterey Bay. At the risk of beating submarine canyons to death, I’m going to try to wrap up this discussion with some final thoughts on why we have one of the world’s largest submarine canyons in our backyard. Monterey Submarine Canyon has been known for over a century, and as with other offshore drainage systems, there has been considerable speculation over the years as to why we have this huge chasm cutting across the seafloor. Most submarine canyons align with river systems, but Elkhorn Slough hardly provides an adequate onshore source for such a massive feature. We do know that prior to 1910 the Salinas River discharged six miles north of its present mouth into Elkhorn Slough, closer to the head of Monterey Submarine Canyons. But even the Salinas River is not of the scale we would expect for an offshore feature as large as the Grand Canyon. Over 50 years ago, two geologists discovered the presence of a deep buried inland canyon beneath the Santa Cruz Mountains from oil company drill holes. This combined with other geological and geophysical observations strongly suggested that this canyon was eroded by an ancient river drainage system that played a critical role in the initial formation of the Monterey Submarine Canyon. This buried canyon, named Pajaro Gorge by some, was the route that the drainage from California’s vast Central Valley followed to the ocean for million of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Loss in the Lower Galveston Bay Watershed
    Galveston Bay Wetland Permit and Mitigation Assessment Lisa Gonzalez Dr. Erin Kinney Dr. John Jacob Marissa Llosa Transportation Stream & Wetland Mitigation Peer Exchange – June 5-6, 2018 Galveston Bay Watershed ~24,000 square miles ~Half of Texas’ population of 28M TXDOT Districts Beaumont Houston Population Growth 213 % 59 % 65 % * 119 % * 54 % 239 % 106 % 89 % % Change in Population 1990 to 2017 Data Source: U.S. Census, *Texas Demographic Center Population Projection Regional Habitat H-GAC Eco-Logical Map; Wetland Mitigation Opportunities white paper, 2014 Regional Land Cover Change; 1996-2010 • Growth in impervious (107K acres) & developed (254K acres) areas • Wetland net change -54K acres NLDC, NOAA C-CAP Coastal Bottomlands and Blue Elbow Mitigation Banks Mitigation Bank Mitigation Bank HUC8 ORMII Permits ORMII Permits Galveston Bay Mitigation Banks TCWP Ground-truth Wetland Mitigation Assessment • 17 sites: 4 permit mitigation sites not accessible, leaving 13 permits for site review (8 PRM, 5 MB). • Assessment criteria based on three-fold definition of a wetland (Tiner, 1989): – Hydrophytic vegetation (partially or completely submerged in water), – Evidence of hydrology, – Soil indicators consistent with wetland hydrology. • Conservative assessment: – Success: “reasonably wet” with recognizable wetland plants and hydric soils. – Failure: substandard compensatory mitigation site with a lack of any evidence for wetland mitigation TCWP Ground-truth Wetland Mitigation Assessment • Minimum 5% of the total mitigation site inventoried. • Plots (10 m x 10 m) representatively within the tract. • Plant species presence and percent cover assessed. • Cover of various biotic and abiotic surface materials collected in each plot. • Comprehensive list of species compiled. • Pictures of the site and the sample plot taken along with any notable site features.
    [Show full text]