The Thermal Commissioning of Bepicolombo MPO

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Thermal Commissioning of Bepicolombo MPO 49th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2019-97 7-11 July 2019, Boston, Massachusetts The Thermal Commissioning of BepiColombo MPO Andrea Ferrero 1, Domenico Battaglia 2 and Tiziano Malosti 3 Thales Alenia Space, I-10146 Torino, Italy Daniele Stramaccioni 4 European Space Agency (ESA-ESTEC), NL-2200AG Noordwijk, the Netherlands and Jürgen Schilke 5 EADS Astrium, D-88039 Friedrichshafen, Germany BepiColombo was launched aboard an Ariane 5 rocket on 20 October 2018 at 01:45 UTC, with arrival on Mercury planned for December 2025, after a flyby of Earth, two flybys of Venus, and six flybys of Mercury. It is the first European mission to Mercury and will place in orbit around the planet two separate spacecraft: Mercury Magnetosphaeric Orbiter (MMO), provided by the Japanese Space Agency (JAXA), and Mercury Planetary Orbiter (MPO), provided by the European Space Agency (ESA). The cruise from Earth to Mercury is being ensured by a dedicated module, Mercury Transport Module (MTM). MPO, the subject of this paper, is the European scientific contribution to the BepiColombo mission. Upon cruise completion, when orbiting Mercury, it will be 3-axis stabilized, planet oriented, with a planned lifetime of 1 year, and a possible 1- year extension. The mission will perform a comprehensive study on Mercury, by means of several instruments, including a laser altimeter, different types of spectrometers, a magnetometer and radio science experiments. This paper describes the activity performed on MPO during pre-launch, launch and commissioning, besides it evaluates the first in orbit thermal results and where possible compares them with the behaviour expected from the analyses and from the results of the environmental thermal test program, in order to provide a first assessment of the spacecraft thermal design and performance. Nomenclature AOCS = Attitude and Orbital Control System RCS = Reaction Control System AU = Astronomical Unit (= 149.60×10 6 km) RSA = Ruag Space Austria GmbH CPS = Chemical Propulsion System S/C = SpaceCraft ESA = European Space Agency STM = Structural Thermal Model GFRP = Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer TAS-I = Thales Alenia Space Italia HGA = Hi gh Gain Antenna TB = Thermal Balance JAXA = Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency TCS = Thermal Control System LEOP = Launch and Early Orbit phase TLL = Temperature Lower Limit MCS = Mercury Composite Spacecraft (stack of TMM = Thermal Mathematical Model MOSIF, MMO, MPO and MTM) TUL = Temperature Upper Limit MGA = Medium Gain Antenna TV = Thermal Vacuum MMO = Mercury Magnetosphere Orbiter UTC = Coordinated Universal Time MOSIF = Magnetospheric Orbiter Sunshade and Interface UV = UltraViolet MPO = Mercury Planetary Orbiter VDA = Vapor Deposited Aluminum 1 Thermal Verification Specialist, B.L. Space Infrastructures and Transportation, Strada Antica di Collegno 253 10146 Torino. 2 Passive Thermal Design Specialist, B.L. Optical Observation & Science, Strada Antica di Collegno 253 10146 Torino. 3 Senior Thermal Analyst, B.L. Space Infrastructures and Transportation, Strada Antica di Collegno 253 10146 Torino. 4 MPO Module Manager, BepiColombo Project, ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2200AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands 5 Thermal Architect, AET42, D-88039 Friedrichshafen Copyright © 2019 Thales Alenia Space MTM = Mercury Transfer Module VUV = Vacuum UltraViolet NECP = Near Earth Commissioning Phase αS = Solar Absorptance PFM = Proto-Flight Model εIR = Infrared Emissivity I. Introduction EPICOLOMBO is the ESA’s cornerstone Z Bmission to Mercury in collaboration with JAXA MMO and will enable a better understanding of the planet history, geology, composition, atmosphere and Y X MOSIF magnetosphere. The mission is named after Italian mathematician and engineer Giuseppe “Bepi” Colombo (1920–1984), who suggested that the MPO Mariner-10 probe could perform three fly-bys of planet Mercury, thus extending significantly the coverage of the planet. It is the first European MTM mission in orbit around Mercury, the second overall after NASA’s MESSENGER (Mariner 10 actually orbited the Sun), and the first to send two spacecraft to make complementary measurements of the planet and its dynamic environment at the same time. With reference to Figure 1, Bepi Colombo Figure 1. Mercury Composite Spacecraft composed of consists of a spinning satellite, Mercury MTM, MPO and MMO inside its sunshade MOSIF . Magnetospheric Orbiter (MMO), provided by JAXA, a shield designed to protect the MMO by the intense Sun radiation during the cruise to Mercury 6 (MOSIF) and a 3-axis stabilized orbiter (MPO), both provided by ESA. Finally, the propulsion module (MTM), also provided by ESA, completes the Mercury Composite Spacecraft (MCS) that is currently cruising from Earth to Mercury. The MTM houses the solar electric propulsion system that is needed to propel the MCS during its cruise. During the 7-year cruise, the MCS stack is 3-axis stabilized and Sun-oriented to ensure sufficient electric power from the MTM solar arrays for the electric propulsion and protection from the Sun. Once BepiColombo reaches its destination, the mission will last for one year, with the possibility of extending its measurements for another year. The Mission is led by Airbus Deutschland Friedrichshafen (ASD), with Thales Alenia Space Italia Turin (TAS-I) responsible for the MPO and MOSIF thermal design. Ruag Space Austria GmbH (RSA) developed and provided the MLI. The MPO carries eleven payloads (P/L) for Mercury Figure 2. BepiColombo liftoff. Credits: ESA/ planet observation and remote sensing. It will provide a CNES/Arianespace/Optique vidéo du CSG – JM Guillon complete mapping of the entire planet surface with unprecedented resolution and will perform also other experiments of radioscience and fundamental physics 7. The specific challenges of the thermal design of this mission and, in particular, of the Mercury orbiter (MPO) stem clearly from the demanding thermal environment in combination with the chosen orbit and with the nadir pointing attitude of the spacecraft will be explained in paragraph II. 6 The MMO cannot withstand the Sun irradiation when it is not spinning. Hence, the MOSIF is designed to keep it in shadow during the cruise to Mercury. 7 For a description of the scientific mission, see ref. 7. 2 International Conference on Environmental Systems II. Mission Overview During its journey to Mercury, BepiColombo will need to make several braking manoeuvres to adjust its orbit and counteract the gravitational pull of the Sun in order to slow down enough to be captured by the gravity of Mercury. The cruise will total around 8.5 billion kilometres – the equivalent of travelling from the Earth to Neptune and back again, or 38 times the maximum distance between the Earth and Mercury. The BepiColombo mission will go through the following phases, with considerable changes of composite spacecraft configuration and thermal environment: • Launch and Early Orbit Phase (MCS); • Near-Earth Commissioning Phase, lasting 3-4 months and including commissioning (MCS). • Interplanetary Cruise Phase (MCS), with min/max distances from Sun 0.298/1.16 AU, and including Earth, Venus, Mercury fly-by’s. The solar irradiance will correspondently range from 1,020 to 15,400 W/m 2. • Mercury approach Phase: o Mercury capture (jettisoning of MTM); o Mercury Orbit Insertion; o MMO Orbit Acquisition, potentially including a Mercury Aphelion passage in nominal MMO orbit (jettisoning of MMO in its final orbit followed by jettisoning of MOSIF); o MPO Orbit Acquisition (MPO alone). • Mercury Orbit Phase (MPO). III. Launch and early LEOP Figure 3. BepiColombo mission profile. BepiColombo was launched aboard Ariane 5 from the Credits: Loren Roberts for The Planetary Society , European Spaceport in Kourou at 01:45:28 UTC on 20 October CC BY-SA 3.0 2018. Booster separation came just two minutes later, as the two solid rocket boosters of Ariane 5 detached themselves from the core stage; later, BepiColombo began its solo flight upon separation from the Ariane upper stage at around 2:12 UTC. At 2:20 UTC, the ESA deep space tracking station at New Norcia, Western Australia, picked up the first signals from the spacecraft, confirming that the launch was successful. Then BepiColombo started communicating bundles of engineering telemetry, as well as spectacular images from three low-resolution monitoring cameras located on the Mercury Transfer Module, that allowed flight controllers to visually verify the correct deployment of solar arrays and high and medium gain antennas. MPO is also equipped with a high- resolution scientific camera, which however is located on the side of the spacecraft fixed to the MTM during cruise, and therefore able to take pictures only after separation upon arrival at Mercury. The launch and early orbit phase was completed on October 22 with the deployment of solar arrays, confirming that the spacecraft and all systems were healthy and functioning. After separation and initialization of attitude control sensors, the sun was on the -X/-Y side and illuminated the radiator. As the sun was slightly above the XY plane, it was trapped between the fins. Figure 4. First image of BepiColombo from At 02:26 the attitude was recovered, with on on +Y (anti- space. Credits: ESA / BepiColombo / MTM, CC radiator side). As usual, the attitude control was switched off BY -SA 3.0 IGO 3 International Conference on Environmental Systems during the deployment of the solar arrays. The S/C movements during the deployments can be clearly seen. The reaction wheels were switched
Recommended publications
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Call for M5 Missions
    ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use M5 Call - Technical Annex Prepared by SCI-F Reference ESA-SCI-F-ESTEC-TN-2016-002 Issue 1 Revision 0 Date of Issue 25/04/2016 Status Issued Document Type Distribution ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use Table of contents: 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Scope of document ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Reference documents .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 List of acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2 General Guidelines ................................................................................................................ 6 3 Analysis of some potential mission profiles ........................................................................... 7 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Current European launchers ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bepicolombo - a Mission to Mercury
    BEPICOLOMBO - A MISSION TO MERCURY ∗ R. Jehn , J. Schoenmaekers, D. Garc´ıa and P. Ferri European Space Operations Centre, ESA/ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany ABSTRACT BepiColombo is a cornerstone mission of the ESA Science Programme, to be launched towards Mercury in July 2014. After a journey of nearly 6 years two probes, the Magneto- spheric Orbiter (JAXA) and the Planetary Orbiter (ESA) will be separated and injected into their target orbits. The interplanetary trajectory includes flybys at the Earth, Venus (twice) and Mercury (four times), as well as several thrust arcs provided by the solar electric propulsion module. At the end of the transfer a gravitational capture at the weak stability boundary is performed exploiting the Sun gravity. In case of a failure of the orbit insertion burn, the spacecraft will stay for a few revolutions in the weakly captured orbit. The arrival conditions are chosen such that backup orbit insertion manoeuvres can be performed one, four or five orbits later with trajectory correction manoeuvres of less than 15 m/s to compensate the Sun perturbations. Only in case that no manoeuvre can be performed within 64 days (5 orbits) after the nominal orbit insertion the spacecraft will leave Mercury and the mission will be lost. The baseline trajectory has been designed taking into account all operational constraints: 90-day commissioning phase without any thrust; 30-day coast arcs before each flyby (to allow for precise navigation); 7-day coast arcs after each flyby; 60-day coast arc before orbit insertion; Solar aspect angle constraints and minimum flyby altitudes (300 km at Earth and Venus, 200 km at Mercury).
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download
    www.arianespace.com www.starsem.com www.avio Arianespace’s eighth launch of 2021 with the fifth Soyuz of the year will place its satellite passengers into low Earth orbit. The launcher will be carrying a total payload of approximately 5 518 kg. The launch will be performed from Baikonur, in Kazakhstan. MISSION DESCRIPTION 2 ONEWEB SATELLITES 3 Liftoff is planned on at exactly: SOYUZ LAUNCHER 4 06:23 p.m. Washington, D.C. time, 10:23 p.m. Universal time (UTC), LAUNCH CAMPAIGN 4 00:23 a.m. Paris time, FLIGHT SEQUENCES 5 01:23 a.m. Moscow time, 03:23 a.m. Baikonur Cosmodrome. STAKEHOLDERS OF A LAUNCH 6 The nominal duration of the mission (from liftoff to separation of the satellites) is: 3 hours and 45 minutes. Satellites: OneWeb satellite #255 to #288 Customer: OneWeb • Altitude at separation: 450 km Cyrielle BOUJU • Inclination: 84.7degrees [email protected] +33 (0)6 32 65 97 48 RUAG Space AB (Linköping, Sweden) is the prime contractor in charge of development and production of the dispenser system used on Flight ST34. It will carry the satellites during their flight to low Earth orbit and then release them into space. The dedicated dispenser is designed to Flight ST34, the 29th commercial mission from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan performed by accommodate up to 36 spacecraft per launch, allowing Arianespace and its Starsem affiliate, will put 34 of OneWeb’s satellites bringing the total fleet to 288 satellites Arianespace to timely deliver the lion’s share of the initial into a near-polar orbit at an altitude of 450 kilometers.
    [Show full text]
  • Echostar Annual Report Year Ended December 31, 2012 March 20, 2013
    NASDAQ: SATS 100 Inverness Terrace East Englewood, CO 80112 303.706.4000 | echostar.com EchoStar Annual Report Year Ended December 31, 2012 March 20, 2013 Dear EchoStar Corporation Shareholders; 2012 was a very busy year for EchoStar. One of the most exciting accomplishments for 2012 was the addition of two new satellites to our growing fleet through the successful launches of EchoStar XVI and EchoStar XVII, bringing our total number of owned, leased and managed spacecraft to twenty-two. EchoStar operates the world’s fourth largest commercial geostationary satellite fleet and we continue to solidify our position as a premier global leader in satellite communications and operations. EchoStar ended 2012 with revenue of $3.1 billion, a growth of 13% over 2011. EBITDA in 2012 was $794 million, a growth of 64% over 2011. We generated a healthy $508 million of cash from operating activities in 2012 as a result primarily of the strong net income in 2012 and ended the year with a strong balance sheet with $1.5 billion of cash and marketable securities. EchoStar reached two very important long-term North America goals in 2012 with the market implementation of the HughesNet Gen4 service and the roll-out of the Hopper Whole Home DVR solution for DISH. Both solutions are garnering high praise and rapid adoption by consumers, a glowing testament to the capabilities and ingenuity of the EchoStar team. Additional notable accomplishments for 2012 include the very successful introduction of two new Slingbox retail products, several large enterprise contract renewals and new customers for Hughes data network services around the globe, and above-forecast sales of set-top-box products and video services to our established operator customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORIX Single-Frequency Multi - Constellation GNSS Receiver
    GEORIX Single-Frequency Multi - Constellation GNSS Receiver GEORIX, the RUAG Space single-frequency GNSS Receiver for GTO and GEO appli- cations provides an excellent on-board real-time navigation solution accuracy of below 20 meter (in GEO) based on an arbitrary mix of GPS and GALILEO space vehicles. Data Products Based on dedicated RF- and Mixed-Signal ASICs as well as – Navigation solution based on GPS/GALILEO constellations the AGGA-4 ASIC, GEORIX is able to use the following signals: – Generation of the PPS signal synchronized to GPS/GALILEO second – GPS C/A on L1 – Carrier phase measurements for each tracked signal – Galileo E1 B/C – code phase measurements for each tracked signal – Support data: Main Features - Tracking state – Antenna with gain pattern optimised for GEO - GDOP – Detached LNAs for improved performance figures - Carrier to noise (C/N) measurement of each tracked signal – GTO support, e.g. for electric propulsion satellites - Noise measurements of each RF down-conversion chain – Support for cross-coupling of two non-redundant antenna/LNA sets - Satellites in view status to cold-redundant electronics box - Satellite navigation message – Accurate force model-based orbit propagator – Advanced Kalman filtering allows high on-board navigation perfor- Interfaces mance – TC/TM interface: MIL-STD-1553B or UART (RS-422) or SpaceWire – Flexible acquisition and tracking concept providing: – PPS output nom/red/test (RS-422) – single frequency signal processing of up to 12 satellites – Primary power interface 100 V regulated –
    [Show full text]
  • ESA & ESOC Overview
    NASA PM Challenge 2010 Developing the International Program/Project Management Community 9/10 February 2010 Dr. Bettina Böhm Program & Project Manager Career at ESA | Bettina Böhm | ESA/HQ | 23/11/09 | Page 1 Used with Permission PURPOSE OF ESA / ACTIVITIES “To provide for and promote, for exclusively Space science peaceful purposes, cooperation among Human spaceflight European states in space research and Exploration technology and their space applications.” Earth observation Launchers [Article 2 of ESA Convention] Navigation ESA is one of the few space agencies Telecommunications in the world to combine responsibility Technology in all areas of space activity. Operations Program & Project Manager Career at ESA | Bettina Böhm | ESA/HQ | 23/11/09 | Page 2 ESA FACTS AND FIGURES Over 30 years of experience 18 Member States 2080 staff, thereof 880 in Program Directorates, 790 in Operations and Technical Support and 410 in other Support Directorates 3 500 million Euros budget Over 60 satellites designed and tested Over 60 satellites operated in-flight and 8 missions rescued 16 scientific satellites in operation Five types of launcher developed More than 180 launches made Program & Project Manager Career at ESA | Bettina Böhm | ESA/HQ | 23/11/09 | Page 3 ESA Locations EAC (Cologne) Salmijaervi ESTEC Astronaut training (Noordwijk) Satellite technology development and testing Harwell ESOC ESA HQ (Darmstadt) (Paris) Brussels Satellite operations and ground system technology development ESAC (Villanueva de la Cañada Oberpfaffenhofen
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Redux
    FEATURE Mercury redux In January 2008, 33 years after Mariner 10 fl ew past the solar system’s innermost planet, MESSENGER crossed Mercury’s magnetosphere. Ancient volcanoes, contractional faults, and a rich soup of exospheric ions give clues to Mercury’s structure and dynamical evolution. Th e Mercury fl yby of the MESSENGER two have not been ruled out, but for those (Mercury surface, space environment, mechanisms shorter-wavelength magnetic geochemistry and ranging) probe was the features would be expected, which were not fi rst of three braking manoeuvres for the observed during the MESSENGER fl yby1. spacecraft , in preparation for its insertion Recent libration observations that require into a polar orbit in 2011. Th e probe a partially molten core11, and the limited achieved the closest approach (201 km) of contraction of Mercury, which implies a Mercury’s surface yet, and took a variety largely molten core, favour a convective of measurements in the magnetosphere, dynamo origin for Mercury’s magnetic fi eld. exosphere and on Mercury’s surface. Some Although Mercury’s magnetosphere of the fi rst results of the MESSENGER looks like a miniature version of Earth’s, mission1–6 reveal Mercury as a planet with Mercury’s relatively weak magnetic richly interconnected dynamics, from fi eld implies that its dynamo must work the dynamo in its molten outer core, a diff erently from that of the Earth. Th e crust and surface with great lobate faults geodynamo, which gives the Earth its and relatively young volcanoes, to a strong magnetic fi eld, is thought to operate magnetosphere that interacts with the core in a magnetostrophic regime in which the dynamo and the interplanetary solar wind.
    [Show full text]
  • Command & Data Handling
    Command & Data Handling We help our customers, the satellite primes, and their customers, the fl eet operators, to manage their spacecraft. We put pride in designing Spacecraft Management Units that are capable of interfacing all the types of equipment you normally find on-board a satellite. Furthermore, we offer our customers a hardware and software environment that makes it easy for them to develop the necessary applications while we take care of system start-up and configuration, software drivers and system debug support. We do all this, and on top we see to that the latest technology available is applied to minimize requirements on mass, volume and power consumption. Ideally, you will not notice our presence! The units handle all commonly used interfaces like reaction wheels, magnetorquers and thrusters as well as standardized analogue and digital interfaces and thermistors. The same basic design is applicable to LEO and GEO satellites and also to interplanetary missions. Features • Everything you need for spacecraft control in a single box • Design scalable to platform size • Highly reliable using internal redundancy and cross-strappings • Advanced hardware support for autonomous missions • Standard interfaces: -Multiple MIL-STD-1553 -SpaceWire -RS-422 UART -Synchronous serial links Functions • On-board satellite telecommand functions as decoding, authen- tication, decryption and distribution of commands • On-board satellite telemetry functions including telemetry data acquisition or generation, formatting, encoding and transmis-
    [Show full text]
  • Imaging the Surface of Mercury Using Ground-Based Telescopes
    Planetary and Space Science 49 (2001) 1501–1505 www.elsevier.com/locate/planspasci Imaging the surface of Mercury using ground-based telescopes Michael Mendilloa; ∗, Johan Warellb, Sanjay S. Limayec, Je+rey Baumgardnera, Ann Spragued, Jody K. Wilsona aCenter for Space Physics, Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Avenue Boston, MA 02215, USA bAstronomiska Observatoriet, Uppsala Universitet, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden cSpace Science and Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA dLunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Received 26 October 2000; received in revised form 12 March2001; accepted 4 May 2001 Abstract We describe and compare two methods of short-exposure, high-deÿnition ground-based imaging of the planet Mercury. Two teams have recorded images of Mercury on di+erent dates, from di+erent locations, and withdi+erent observational and data reduction techniques. Both groups have achieved spatial resolutions of ¡ 250 km, and the same albedo features and contrast levels appear where the two datasets overlap (longitudes 270–360◦). Dark albedo regions appear as mare and correlate well withsmoothterrain radar signatures. Bright albedo features agree optically, but less well withradar data. Suchconÿrmations of state-of-the-artoptical techniquesintroduce a new era of ground-based exploration of Mercury’s surface and its atmosphere. They o+er opportunities for synergistic, cooperative observations before and during the upcoming Messenger and BepiColombo missions to Mercury. c 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction maximum separation (elongation) to the west and east of the rising or setting Sun, respectively. Under suchconditions, In this paper, we compare the ÿrst results from two new Mercury can be separated from the Sun by up to 28◦.
    [Show full text]
  • First Look at Mercury
    PLANETARY SCIENCE Mariner 10 was launched to Mercury by way of Venus on November 3, 1973. It was not the first probe to visit Venus. Both the United States and the Soviet Union previously have sent probes to that mysterious, cloud-shrouded planet. However, Mariner 10 was the first to photographically explore the close-up appearance of the planet, and did so both in visibIe and in ultraviolet light. And Mariner 10 was the first probe of any kind to penetrate interplanetary space beyond the orbit of Venus and to achieve a close look at the planet Mercury. First Look Why go to Mercury? Who needs it? There basically are two kinds of reasons. The first is simple and profound and at Mercury difficult to quantify: The very act of exploration is a positive, cultural activity. No one knows what is going to be found. Finding out what Mercury, what Mars, or BRUCE C. MURRAY what the moon is really like, enlarges the consciousness of all the people who partake of that new reality. TV pictures are of special importance because they provide a way both for the scientist to discover features and concepts he could not have imagined and for the public to directly appreciate and participate in the exploration of a new world. Why go to Mercury? Who needs it? But there are more specific scientific objectives as well. For Mercury, the basic-and anomalous-scientific fact is A planetary scientist that it is a very dense planet: It contains a great amount of tells what the voyage mass for its size.
    [Show full text]