DOCSLIB.ORG

Text of Report of British-U. S. Inquiry on Palestine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Text of Report of British-U. S. Inquiry on Palestine THE NEW YORK TI:\lES, WEDNESDA \, :.\IAY 1, 19-¼6. C+ 15 TEXT OF REPORT OF BRITISH-U. S. INQUIRY ON PALESTINE Fn1loirinq is the tr,xt of /hp report of thB Anglo-American ways in which help can be given. HOW LAND DEALS ARE LIMITED IN PALESTINE National Home, created in conse-lestine. Such a pottcy, 1mggested by war development; we could wish • . Those who have opposed the ad• quence of the Balfour Declaration. the Peel Commission, is consistent that means might be found for Comm1ftef' of Inqmry 011 problem,, of ,le11•s 1n Europe and Pales- mission of these unfortunate peo- r.======::;;:;===::::::;::;;re==::::::::::::=:::::=:;:;::;::;::;;:;::;::;:;::;:;::;::;:;::;::;::;:;::;::;:;:, Some may think that that declara• with their proposed solution, par- projects of larger range and on a tine, released last night: pie into Palestine should know that f~~HI tion was wrong and should not tition, but scarcely with that put more ambitious scale; but we rec• we have fully considered all that have been made; some that it was forward by us. ognize that until political peace l1 they have put before us. We hope a conception on a grand scale and The leases granted by the • eWish restored there is great difficulty in Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry that they will look upon the situ- that effect can be given to one of National Fund contain a provision raising the necessary funds wheth- ation again, that they will appre- jjw,~--~i the most daring and significant that no labor other than JeWish er from revenue or borrowing. Report to ciate the consideration~ which have colonization plans in history. Con- shall be employed by the lessee on Meanwhile it ls suggested that led us to our conclusion, and that ~~~~~ troversy as to which view is right or about or in conection with the the Government should acquire ThP Unitt>d States His :\fa_jesty's Go\ernment above all, if they cannot see their is fruitless. The national home is land subject to the lease, and a pow~rs. at present tacking, to in• Go~ernmPnt in the Unit. d Kingdom way to help, at least they will not ~~~~ '/it,~~fl there. Its roots are deep in the further provision that a sublease vesbgate fully the extent of the L,111.~a n ne., Su·itzerland, make the position of these suffer- soil of Palestine. It cannot be ar- shall contain similar terms. country's water resources, to con• AP[il 20, 1946. ers more difficult. gued ou! of existence; neither can As we have said, we are op- trol the use of un~erground water Principles of Government: t~e achievements of the Jewish posed to such discrimination. We ~i to determine rights to surface N A b N h St pwneers. appreciate that one of the reasons w er. PREFACE o ra , o •J ew1s · a t e The Government of Palestme m f h . to We doubt whether Palestine can We ¼ere appointed by the Gov-' tion m1der paragraph 2 above, Recommendat· N 3 I d having regard to the well-being of or sue prov1s1ons _wa~ .secure expand its economy to the full 1011 0 ~rnment~ of the United States and by remedial action in the Eu- . • • n or er all the eo le of Palestine cannot employment for Jewish ~igrants having regard to its limited nat~ or the Umted Kingdom as a joint1 ropean countries in que~tion or to dISJ?OSe, once and for all, of the i¥§~~~ -l>lt:::ai,,,: · & p t t f l on the 1~nd· _We_ ~o not think tl_lat ural resources without a full and body of _Amer_ican and Brit_i~h I by _the provision of facilities for exclusive_ claims of Jews_and Arabs ~~fi~~ ofe t1::e er~s :1a~io!~ I\r~!n~ that obJect _Justif!es the r~tention free Interchange of goods and ■ erv• membershtp, with the following em1gr8:hon to. and settlement m t? Palestine, we regard it as essen- not i nore the ic~ieYements of the of such sbpulabo~s which are ices with neighboring countries. In Terms of Reference: countnes outside Europe. tial t~at a cl~ar statement of the .-'='-!..!7'-.!-.!..!..!,I ..,~"~~.;~[',j t g t f t N G harmful to cooperat1on and under- some respects indeed as in cer- ·t· J · followmg prmc1ples should be 1as quar er O a cen ury. 0 ov-,sta d' g b t e Arab and Jew ' ' (1 l T o examine po_l I ica' economic The Governments urged upon us made· ernment o! Palestine doing its n m e "'. en . tain projects involving water sup- and social _cond1tions in Pales- the need for the utmost expedition · duty to the people of that land can L~nd acquired by the Jewish ply, their active collaboration ii tine as the)_ bear up_on t~e prob- in dealing with the subjects com- _(Il That Jew shall not dominate --=,.;:.-;....;;=:.ii fail to do its best not only to main- National Fund or for a Wa9f by indispensable to full development !em of Jewish 1mm1grat1on and mitted to us for investigation, and A1ab_ and Arab shall not dominate jtain the national home but also to the Su))'l'e~e Moslem Counc1l be- on an economic basis. settlement therem and the w~ll- requested to be furnished with our J_ew m Palestm_e. (~IJ Th~t Pales- foster its roper development and comes malienable. The Peel Com- The removal of Article 18 of the hPmg of the peoples now hvmg Report within one hundred and tme shall be neither a Jewish state ~==~~~~~~'-!) h d 1 t t , m1ss1on expressed the view in its mandate would clear the way to therem. twenty days of the mceplion of nor an Arab state. (III) That the sue . evelopmen. mut?' m our report (Chapter IX paragraph 80) those comprehensive tariff and (2 1 T o examine· the pos,_·t· t0n_ ofthe our inquiry.. form of gove. rnmen t u 1t·1ma t e Iy t o =---~====""· view• mvo ve .1mnugra 10n. that caution. on the' part of the trade agreements, not confl!ctmg.. .Je"'s 1'1 those countries m En-1 We assembled in Washington on be _established, shall, under mter- The well-bemg of all the people Government in disposing of state with any international obligations rope whe1e lhey have been the F d 4th J 916 db nat10nal guarantees, fully protect of Palestme, be they Jews, Arabs domam to these bodies was des1r- that might be accepted by the victims of Nazi and Fa~cist ~er- g;; ~~~ publi~n~:srii~ ~ ; t~e tot and p1eserve the _interests ln the or neither,_ must be t~e govern_ing able. The situation required watch- mandatory or trustee, which could 1 1 1 11 01 5 11ecut10n, and ~he pract1cal110wmg Monday. We sailed from Holy Land of Chnst~ndom and or eon ider~tion, We reJeet the view ing. It would not be to the inter- ultimately lead to something like measures ta~en 01 contem))lated 1the Umted States on lSth January the Moslem and Jewish faiths. __,""'"'--'''·'" ~hat ~!lei~ shal_l be no further Je_w- ests of the inhabitants of Palestine a customs union-an objective al- to be taken m t~ose countnes _to and resumed our public sessions m Thus Palestine ~ust ultimately is~ immigration . mto Pales~me if too large a proportion of the land ready m mind as between the aur• 1 ~nable them to live free f~om dis- London on 25th January. We left b~come a st!'-te wluch guards the J wit~out Arab ac~mes~ence, a " ew should become inalienable, whether rounding countries of the Arab cr1mmation and oppression ~nd for Euro e on 4th and 5th Febru- nghts and mterests of 1oslems, wh•~h ":'ould result m the Arab held by one organization or an- League. to make e_stima~es of those y,ho P . _ Jews and Christians alike and ac- ~ommatmg the Jew. We also re- other. • wish or will be impelled by their ary, and• working in subeommit cords to the mhabitants as a ~ Ject the insistent Jewish demand . Educahon c~nd1tions to m1grat1; to Pal~s- tees, proceeded to our mvestlga: whole, the fullest measure 'or self- that forced Jewish immigration In the small, th1~kly populated tme or other countnes outside tions m Germany, Poland, Czecho . I must d . d to country of Palestme, with its Recommendation No. 9. We rec• E•iro e .slovakia, Austria, Italy and government cons1sten~ with the ,.,.,,,..,-.,,.,,,A procee _apace m 0 r _er rapidly increasing population, it ls ommend that, in the interests of ph. lh . f Greece. On 28th February we flew three paran,ount prmc1ples aet § pro~uce as _qu_1ckly as possible a in the mterest of Jews and Arabs the conciliation of the two people& (3) T o ear e views o compe• . t forth above Jewish maJority and a Jewtsh d 1 t tent wltne~ses and to consult to Cairo and, after sessions here, · f'i St t Th 11 b . f th J a.like that all land should be de- an of genera lmprovemen of the representati~e Arabs and Jews reached Jerusalem on 6th March. Comment. Throughout the long l,Y a e. t we e:g d tehw~ veloped and put to the fuJJest pos- Arab standard of hvmg, the edu- t ~ 8 b ~ i80 on the problems of Palestine as In Palestine, our sessions were in• and bloody struggle of Jew and muS no .e ~ or ma E' a sible use.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Steps to Statehood Timeline
    STEPS TO STATEHOOD TIMELINE Tags: History, Leadership, Balfour, Resources 1896: Theodor Herzl's publication of Der Judenstaat ("The Jewish State") is widely considered the foundational event of modern Zionism. 1917: The British government adopted the Zionist goal with the Balfour Declaration which views with favor the creation of "a national home for the Jewish people." / Balfour Declaration Feb. 1920: Winston Churchill: "there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State." Apr. 1920: The governments of Britain, France, Italy, and Japan endorsed the British mandate for Palestine and also the Balfour Declaration at the San Remo conference: The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 8, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people. July 1922: The League of Nations further confirmed the British Mandate and the Balfour Declaration. 1937: Lloyd George, British prime minister when the Balfour Declaration was issued, clarified that its purpose was the establishment of a Jewish state: it was contemplated that, when the time arrived for according representative institutions to Palestine, / if the Jews had meanwhile responded to the opportunities afforded them ... by the idea of a national home, and had become a definite majority of the inhabitants, then Palestine would thus become a Jewish commonwealth. July 1937: The Peel Commission: 1. "if the experiment of establishing a Jewish National Home succeeded and a sufficient number of Jews went to Palestine, the National Home might develop in course of time into a Jewish State." 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Cook (India) 4Th June 2018
    Institutional Equities Thomas Cook (India) 4th June 2018 Reuters: THOM.NS; Bloomberg: TC IN Prudently Travelling Through The Growth Path BUY Thomas Cook (India) or TCIL is an asset-light, high-FCF and RoIC business growing in mid- teens on the back of constant product innovation and diversified revenue streams. We believe Sector: Tourism TCIL is a long-term compounding story and thus initiate coverage on it. At the current stock price, the market has ignored the legacy travel and forex business which continues to grow CMP: Rs271.60 well. Secular growth in tourism backed by improving disposable income, stable economic Target Price: Rs350 growth and efficiency gains should increase revenues/EBIT by 15%/34% CAGR, respectively, over FY18-FY21E for travel, forex and vacation ownership business. Additionally, the Upside: 29% company’s reasonable acquisition track record while maintaining a rock-solid balance sheet is a free option at this price. We expect the stock to continue its upward march and have Mohit Khanna assigned Buy rating to it with target price of Rs350, representing a 29% upside. Research Analyst Secular growth in tourism: India’s inbound/outbound/forex volume growth in 2017 has increased to [email protected] 16%/11%/17% vs. last ten-year CAGR of 7%/10%/15%, respectively. However, India’s share in the global tourism pie is still dismal at 1.2%/1.5%/1.9% for inbound/outbound/forex volume, respectively. +91-22-6273 8089 This indicates vast headroom to grow. There are multiple ways to play the tourism growth theme including hotels and airlines.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Politics of Nomadism in Modern Palestine (1882-1948)
    History and Politics of Nomadism in Modern Palestine (1882-1948) A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Arabic and Islamic Studies By Seraje Assi, M.A. Washington, DC May 30, 2016 Copyright 2016 by Seraje Assi All Rights Reserved ii History and Politics of Nomadism in Modern Palestine (1882-1948) Seraje Assi, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Judith Tucker, Ph.D. ABSTRACT My research examines contending visions on nomadism in modern Palestine. It is a comparative study that covers British, Arab and Zionist attitudes to nomadism. By nomadism I refer to a form of territorialist discourse, one which views tribal formations as the antithesis of national and land rights, thus justifying the exteriority of nomadism to the state apparatus. Drawing on primary sources in Arabic and Hebrew, I show how local conceptions of nomadism have been reconstructed on new legal taxonomies rooted in modern European theories and praxis. By undertaking a comparative approach, I maintain that the introduction of these taxonomies transformed not only local Palestinian perceptions of nomadism, but perceptions that characterized early Zionist literature. The purpose of my research is not to provide a legal framework for nomadism on the basis of these taxonomies. Quite the contrary, it is to show how nomadism, as a set of official narratives on the Bedouin of Palestine, failed to imagine nationhood and statehood beyond the single apparatus of settlement. iii The research and writing of this thesis is dedicated to everyone who helped along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonialism, Colonization, and Land Law in Mandate Palestine: the Zor Al-Zarqa and Barrat Qisarya Land Disputes in Historical Perspective
    Theoretical Inquiries in Law 4.2 (2003) Colonialism, Colonization, and Land Law in Mandate Palestine: The Zor al-Zarqa and Barrat Qisarya Land Disputes in Historical Perspective Geremy Forman & Alexandre Kedar* This articlefocuses on land rights, land law, and land administration within a multilayered colonial setting by examining a major land dispute in British-ruled Palestine (1917-1948). Our research reveals that the Mandate legal system extinguished indigenous rights to much land in the Zor al-Zarqa and Barrat Qisarya regions through its use of "colonial law"- the interpretation of Ottoman law by colonial officials, the use of foreign legal concepts, and the transformation of Ottoman law through supplementary legislation.However the colonial legal system was also the site of local resistance by some Palestinian Arabs attempting to remain on their land in the face of the pressure of the Mandate authorities and Jewish colonization officials. This article sheds light on the dynamics of the Mandate legal system and colonial law in the realm of land tenure relations.It also suggests that the joint efforts of Mandate and Jewish colonization officials to appropriate Geremy Forman is a Ph.D. candidate in the University of Haifa's Department of Land of Israel Studies. Alexandre (Sandy) Kedar is a Lecturer in the University of Haifa's Faculty of Law. Names of authors by alphabetical order. We would like to thank Oren Yiftachel for his contribution to this article and Michael Fischbach for his insightful remarks and suggestions. We are also grateful to Assaf Likhovsky for his feedback and constructive criticism, to Anat Fainstein for her research assistance, and to Dana Rothman of Theoretical Inquiries in Law for her expert editorial advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Partition and Lead-Up to Violence
    P artition and lead­up to violence U.N. PARTITION PLAN (1947) Palestinians Jews Percentage of land awarded 44.5% 55.5% by the plan Percentage of total >66.7% <33% population in 1947 Percentage of total land 93% 7% owned in 1947 Percentage of population in 98.8% 1.2% proposed Palestinian state Percentage of population in 46.7% 53.3% proposed Jewish state Percentage of population in 51.2% 48.8% proposed Jerusalem enclave ❖ The Nakba occurred primarily during 1948. In November 1947 the UN proposed a partition plan that split the land about equally between the Jewish and Arab sides. At this time Jews comprised one­third of the local population and owned about 5 percent of the land. ❖ According to the Partition Plan, the Jewish State would comprise fifty­five percent of Palestine, an area inhabited by 500,000 Jews and almost 400,000 Palestinians. About 700,000 people, including some 10,000 Jews, lived in the area intended for the Palestinian state. The plan intended to establish two states in the country, with a joint economy. The plan opposed forced relocation of populations, but its implementation would, in practice, have required uprooting hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. Despite some opposition by the Jewish public, the Zionist leadership accepted the proposed partition because it represented the first official recognition of a Jewish state, and because it was the most generous proposal that had yet been offered. ❖ The leadership of the Palestinians and of the Arabs rejected the UN decision because although most of the inhabitants of the country were Palestinians, the borders of the state planned for them included less than fifty percent of the country’s land, and they would lose most of the country’s fertile regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Rights As a Nation-State in International Diplomacy
    Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Institute for Research and Policy המרכז הירושלמי לענייני ציבור ומדינה )ע"ר( ISRAEl’s RiGHTS as a Nation-State in International Diplomacy Israel’s Rights as a Nation-State in International Diplomacy © 2011 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs – World Jewish Congress Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai Street, Jerusalem, Israel Tel. 972-2-561-9281 Fax. 972-2-561-9112 Email: [email protected] www.jcpa.org World Jewish Congress 9A Diskin Street, 5th Floor Kiryat Wolfson, Jerusalem 96440 Phone : +972 2 633 3000 Fax: +972 2 659 8100 Email: [email protected] www.worldjewishcongress.com Academic Editor: Ambassador Alan Baker Production Director: Ahuva Volk Graphic Design: Studio Rami & Jaki • www.ramijaki.co.il Cover Photos: Results from the United Nations vote, with signatures, November 29, 1947 (Israel State Archive) UN General Assembly Proclaims Establishment of the State of Israel, November 29, 1947 (Israel National Photo Collection) ISBN: 978-965-218-100-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Overview Ambassador Alan Baker .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 The National Rights of Jews Professor Ruth Gavison ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 “An Overwhelmingly Jewish State” - From the Balfour Declaration to the Palestine Mandate
    [Show full text]
  • Aberdeen Open Day Minimises Downtime
    Tel: 0121 550 7510 ● Issue 316 www.businessandindustrytoday.co.uk Inside this issue: Minimises downtime Aberdeen Open Day By installing MISTRAS Group invited eWON Flexy VPN people working within routers from M.A.C the Oil & Gas sector to their Offices in Aberdeen. Solutions and The event was held over using the Talk2M two days which allowed Internet-based MISTRAS group to remote access showcase the services system, Packaging they offer to the Oil & Gas Sector. Automation, a manufacture MISTRAS group shared of high speed technical presentations Solutions Training food tray sealing on industry hot topics machines is now such as Stress corrosion See them on page ................... 11 cracking, corrosion able to offer its under insulation and customers a range trunnion support of added-value He continues, “We can also offer inspection, as well as options. customers a live, web-based view live demonstrations of their machine and its current on advanced NDT and monitoring technologies. Rui Cardadeiro of Packaging operating state, as well as live Customers were Automation explains, “The production statistics including encouraged to bring eWON Flexy router and Talk2M output, current running speed and colleagues to the event to solution provide us with remote historic details of stoppages and help them understand the MISTRAS group have 3 more open days connectivity into the heart of changes to machine parameters.” many services that MISTRAS group can planned around the UK. The next Open offer to the Oil & Gas industry. day will be held at the Rotherham office the customer’s machine via the looking at traditional NDT methods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Partitions of British India and Mandatory Palestine, 1937-1948
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2015 Behind the Lines: The Partitions of British India and Mandatory Palestine, 1937-1948 Jessica Solodkin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Solodkin, Jessica, "Behind the Lines: The Partitions of British India and Mandatory Palestine, 1937-1948" (2015). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 95. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/95 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Behind the Lines: The Partitions of British India and Mandatory Palestine, 1937-1948 By Jessica Solodkin Thesis Supervisor: Abigail McGowan Honors College Thesis Department of History University of Vermont December 2015 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements……………………………3 Introduction……………………………………4 Chapter 1: British India………………………19 India Maps………………………………39 Chapter 2: Mandatory Palestine……………...40 Proposal Maps………………………48, 59 Chapter 3: Comparison……………………….63 Conclusion……………………………………92 Bibliography…………………………………..95 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project has taken me on an incredible journey of exploration, discovery, and growth. For the past year and a half, I have gained invaluable skills, knowledge, and created unforgettable memories. This journey, however, would not have been complete without the love and support of my family. Without the guidance, wisdom, encouragement, assistance, and kindness of Professor Abigail McGowan, this project and level of personal growth would not have been as meaningful. Your patience, advice, endless office hours, and investment in me have meant the world to me.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 19 March 2010
    United Nations A/HRC/13/NGO/138 General Assembly Distr.: General 19 March 2010 English only Human Rights Council Thirteenth session Agenda items 7 and 9 Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance, follow-up and implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action Written statement* submitted by the World Union for Progressive Judaism (WUPJ), a non-governmental organization on the roster The Secretary-General has received the following written statement which is circulated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31. [14 March 2010] * This written statement is issued, unedited, in the language(s) received from the submitting non- governmental organization(s). GE.10-12320 A/HRC/13/NGO/138 Palestine Partition Plans (1922 & 1947): Right to the Truth on Refugees 1. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 181 [II], the second ‘Partition Plan’ of the Mandatory area of Palestine. The aim was to divide the land west of the river Jordan into “independent Arab and Jewish States” within the remaining area – roughly 23 percent of the designated League of Nations Palestine area of 120,000 km², with Jerusalem as a corpus separatum administered directly by the United Nations. 2. In 1922, all the League of Nations designated area east of the Jordan river (about 77 percent, 94,000 km² of Palestine) was offered to Britain’s World War I ally, the Emir Abdullah (exiled by the Saudis from Arabia), thus creating a de facto Hashemite Emirate of Trans-Jordan, which declared its independence in 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • SRO List EFDS Posting Feb 2019.Xlsx
    Significantly Regulated Organizations Added ‐ February 2019 DUNS TICKER BUSINESS NAME COUNTRY NAME EXCHANGE NAME NUMBER SYMBOL 220117440 MEDAPHOR GROUP PLC WALES MED London Stock Exchange (LON) 555278141 CAI LAY VETERINARY PHARMACY JOINT STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM MKV Hanoi Stock Exchange 555295156 CAN THO MINERAL AND CEMENT JOINT STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM CCM Hanoi Stock Exchange 555519774 CENTRAL PETROCHEMICAL AND FERTILIZER JOINT STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM PCE Hanoi Stock Exchange 555537308 HIEP KHANH TEA JOINT‐STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM HKT Hanoi Stock Exchange 555530218 HVA INVESTMENT JOINT STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM HVA Hanoi Stock Exchange 555242481 KIM VI INOX IMPORT EXPORT PRODUCTION JOINT STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM KVC Hanoi Stock Exchange 555322911 LILAMA 45.4 JOINT ‐ STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM L44 Hanoi Stock Exchange 555242771 MY XUAN BRICK TILE POTTERY AND CONSTRUCTION JOINT STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM GMX Hanoi Stock Exchange 555319545 NGAN SON JOINT STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM NST Hanoi Stock Exchange 555399648 NHA BE WATER SUPPLY JOINT STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM NBW Hanoi Stock Exchange 555290113 PETROVIETNAM TECHNICAL SERVICES CORPORATION VIETNAM PVS Hanoi Stock Exchange 555295524 PHUONG DONG PETROLEUM TOURISM JOINT STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM PDC Hanoi Stock Exchange 555265232 PP.PHARCO VIETNAM PPP Hanoi Stock Exchange 555431882 SAI GON VEGETABLE OIL JOINT STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM SGO Hanoi Stock Exchange 555304039 SAIGON HOTEL CORPORATION VIETNAM SGH Hanoi Stock Exchange 555295100 SIMCO SONGDA JOINT STOCK COMPANY VIETNAM SDA Hanoi Stock Exchange 555319875 SONG DA NO 11 JOINT
    [Show full text]
  • Forms, Ideals, and Methods. Bauhaus Transfers to Mandatory Palestine
    Ronny Schüler Forms, Ideals, and Methods. Bauhaus Transfers to Mandatory Palestine Introduction A “Bauhaus style” would be a setback to academic stagnation, into a state of inertia hostile to life, the combatting of which the Bauhaus was once founded. May the Bauhaus be saved from this death. Walter Gropius, 1930 The construction activities of the Jewish community in the British Mandate of Palestine represents a prominent paradigm for the spread of European avant-garde architecture. In the 1930s, there is likely no comparable example for the interaction of a similar variety of influences in such a confined space. The reception of architectural modernism – referred to as “Neues Bauen” in Germany – occurred in the context of a broad cultural transfer process, which had already begun in the wake of the waves of immigration (“Aliyot”) from Eu- rope at the end of the nineteenth century and had a formative effect within the emancipating Jewish community in Palestine (“Yishuv”). Among the growing number of immigrants who turned their backs on Europe with the rise of fas- cism and National Socialism were renowned intellectuals, artists, and archi- tects. They brought the knowledge and experience they had acquired in their 1 On the transfer process of modernity European homelands. In the opposite direction too, young people left to gain using the example of the British Mandate of Palestine, see. Heinze-Greenberg 2011; 1 professional knowledge, which was beneficial in their homeland. Dogramaci 2019; Stabenow/Schüler 2019. Despite the fact that, in the case of Palestine, the broad transfer processes were fueled by a number of sources and therefore represent the plurality of European architectural modernism, the Bauhaus is assigned outstanding 2 importance.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the Areas Under Control of the Palestinian Authority
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 2000 International Commercial Arbitration: A Case Study of the Areas Under Control of the Palestinian Authority Marshall J. Breger The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Marshall J. Breger and Shelby Quast, International Commercial Arbitration: A Case Study of the Areas Under Control of the Palestinian Authority, 32 CASE W. RES. J. INT’L L. 185 (2000) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE AREAS UNDER CONTROL OF THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY MarshallJ. Breger & Shelby R. Quast* I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 187 II. THE OSLO AGREEMENT ............................................................ 188 III. OPERATIVE ARBITRATION LAWS APPLICABLE IN THE AREAS UNDER CONTROL OF THE PALESTINIAN AUTH ORITY .................................................................................. 194 A. Jordanian
    [Show full text]