DOCSLIB.ORG

The History of Mesopotamia by Ancient History Encyclopedia, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 07.21.17 Word Count 720 Level 850L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The History of Mesopotamia by Ancient History Encyclopedia, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 07.21.17 Word Count 720 Level 850L Ms. Kimball History- 6th Grade Week 2 4/14- 4/17 Name Date Per The History of Mesopotamia By Ancient History Encyclopedia, adapted by Newsela staff on 07.21.17 Word Count 720 Level 850L Sculpted relief depicting Ashurbanipal, the last great Assyrian king, hunting lions, gypsum hall relief from the North Palace of Nineveh (Irak), c. 645-635 B.C., British Museum. Photo by: Carole Raddato/Wikimedia. Mesopotamia was an ancient region in what is now called the Middle East. Its history reaches back thousands of years and includes many civilizations. This history can be better understood by dividing it into different ages. Pre-Pottery Neolithic Age (about 12,000 years ago in 10,000 B.C.) This period is also known as the Stone Age. It saw the shift from a hunting and gathering way of life to one based around farming. There is evidence of early settlements and even some signs of warfare between tribes. People most likely fought over land for growing crops. Pottery Neolithic Age (7000 B.C.) In this period, we can start seeing a specific culture began in Mesopotamia. Stone tools and weapons became more complex. Most people were involved in food production through farming and raising animals. For this reason, communities were more settled than they were in the Stone This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. Ms. Kimball History- 6th Grade Week 2 4/14- 4/17 Age. They moved around a lot less. Permanent settlements led to the construction of more advanced buildings and tools. Copper Age (5900 - 3200 B.C.) This period is known as the Copper Age, after people stopped using stone tools and weapons and started using ones made of copper. This period also saw the rise of cities. Mesopotamia was the most developed region in the ancient world. The cities along the Tigris and Euphrates rivers created systems of trade that produced great wealth. This period saw the invention of the wheel and writing, both by the Sumerians. Increased wealth in the region gave rise to detailed temples, statues and pottery. People began using personal seals to mark their property. Early Bronze Age (3000 - 2119 B.C.) During this period, bronze replaced copper as the material from which tools and weapons were made. This period also saw the rise of city-states. These were independent cities that had their own governments. The growth of city-states would eventually lead to the Akkadian Empire, the first multinational empire in the world. The library in the city of Mari contained over 20,000 cuneiform tablets, the "books" of the time. The palace there was considered one of the finest in the region. Middle Bronze Age (2119 - 1700 B.C.) This period saw the expansion of the Assyrian Kingdoms and the rise of the Babylonian Dynasty. This growth led to increased trade and warfare. The king of Babylon was Hammurabi, who conquered the region and ruled for 43 years. Among his many accomplishments was his famous code of laws, written on a large stone slab. Babylon became a leading center at this time for learning and the arts. This cultural center was not to last, however. It was destroyed by the Hittites, who were then succeeded by the Kassites. Late Bronze Age (1700 - 1100 B.C.) During the late Bronze Age, people discovered how to mine ore and make use of iron. The Kassites used iron weapons in war. However, the Kassites were defeated by the Elamites and driven out. Later, the small Kingdom of Assyria took over the region. Most Mesopotamian states were either destroyed or weakened following the Bronze Age Collapse around 1200 B.C. Iron Age (1000 - 500 B.C.) The Iron Age saw the rise and expansion of the Neo-Assyrian Empire. However, the Empire soon fell due to attacks by Babylonians, Medes and Scythians. During this period, King Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon destroyed the city of Jerusalem. He also created famous buildings such as the Great Ziggurat (also called the "Tower of Babel"). The fall of Babylon to Persia in 539 B.C. effectively ended Babylonian culture. Classical Antiquity (500 B.C. - 600 A.D.) This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. Ms. Kimball History- 6th Grade Week 2 4/14- 4/17 After Persia took Babylon, most of Mesopotamia became part of the Persian Empire. This period saw a rapid cultural decline. In 331 B.C. Alexander the Great conquered the Persians, bringing the culture and religion of ancient Greece to the region. After his death, Alexander’s general Seleucus took control of the region and founded the Seleucid Dynasty. In 116 A.D. the Roman Empire conquered the region. By then Mesopotamia had largely adopted Greek culture and forgotten its old ways. The Romans improved the region by introducing better roads and plumbing. They also brought Roman law to the land. Around 600 A.D. Muslim Arabs took over the region, which resulted in the unification of law, language, religion and culture under Islam. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. Ms. Kimball History- 6th Grade Week 2 4/14- 4/17 Quiz 1 Which of the following are two main ideas from the article? 1. The development of permanent settlements in Mesopotamia led to advances in technology. 2. Mesopotamia was a single powerful civilization located in the Middle East. 3. Mesopotamian culture relied on the use of strict laws to be successful. 4. Mesopotamian history is separated into different periods of time marked by important changes. (A) 1 and 2 (B) 2 and 4 (C) 1 and 4 (D) 3 and 4 2 Which sentence from the article would be most important to include in a summary of the article? (A) The cities along the Tigris and Euphrates rivers created systems of trade that produced great wealth. (B) People began using personal seals to mark their property. (C) The library in the city of Mari contained over 20,000 cuneiform tablets, the "books" of the time. (D) It was destroyed by the Hittites, who were then succeeded by the Kassites. 3 This article is organized using chronological order. Why do you think the author chose to organize the information this way? (A) to show that the end of Mesopotamia was predictable (B) to show that the region slowly changed over time (C) to show that the region overcame many challenges to thrive (D) to show the similarities and differences between the ages 4 Read the "Pre-Pottery Neolithic Age (about 12,000 years ago in 10,000 B.C.)" and "Pottery Neolithic Age (7000 B.C.)" sections. What is the connection between these two sections? (A) The second section describes the events of the first section in more detail. (B) The second section explains the cause of the changes discussed in the first section. (C) The second section explains why the time period discussed in the first section is important. (D) The second section includes comparisons to the information included in the first section. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Writing the History of Southern Mesopotamia* by Eva Von
    On Writing the History of Southern Mesopotamia* by Eva von Dassow — Colorado State University In his book Babylonia 689-627 B.C., G. Frame provides a maximally detailed his- tory of a specific region during a closely delimited time period, based on all available sources produced during that period or bearing on it. This review article critiques the methods used to derive the history from the sources and the conceptual framework used to apprehend the subject of the history. Babylonia 689-627 B. C , the revised version of Grant Frame's doc- toral dissertation, covers one of the most turbulent and exciting periods of Babylonian history, a time during which Babylon succes- sively experienced destruction and revival at Assyria's hands, then suf- fered rebellion and siege, and lastly awaited the opportunity to over- throw Assyria and inherit most of Assyria's empire. Although, as usual, the preserved textual sources cover these years unevenly, and often are insufficiently varied in type and origin (e.g., royal or non- royal, Babylonian or Assyrian), the years from Sennacherib's destruc- tion of Babylon in 689 to the eve of Nabopolassar's accession in 626 are also a richly documented period. Frame's work is an attempt to digest all of the available sources, including archaeological evidence as well as texts, in order to produce a maximally detailed history. Sur- rounding the book's core, chapters 5-9, which proceed reign by reign through this history, are chapters focussing on the sources (ch. 2), chronology (ch. 3), the composition of Babylonia's population (ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Iraq
    Republic of Iraq Babylon Nomination Dossier for Inscription of the Property on the World Heritage List January 2018 stnel oC fobalbaT Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 State Party .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Province ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Name of property ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Geographical coordinates to the nearest second ................................................................................................. 1 Center ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 N 32° 32’ 31.09”, E 44° 25’ 15.00” ..................................................................................................................... 1 Textural description of the boundary .................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria under which the property is nominated .................................................................................................. 4 Draft statement
    [Show full text]
  • Babylonian Populations, Servility, and Cuneiform Records
    Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 60 (2017) 715-787 brill.com/jesh Babylonian Populations, Servility, and Cuneiform Records Jonathan S. Tenney Cornell University [email protected] Abstract To date, servility and servile systems in Babylonia have been explored with the tradi- tional lexical approach of Assyriology. If one examines servility as an aggregate phe- nomenon, these subjects can be investigated on a much larger scale with quantitative approaches. Using servile populations as a point of departure, this paper applies both quantitative and qualitative methods to explore Babylonian population dynamics in general; especially morbidity, mortality, and ages at which Babylonians experienced important life events. As such, it can be added to the handful of publications that have sought basic demographic data in the cuneiform record, and therefore has value to those scholars who are also interested in migration and settlement. It suggests that the origins of servile systems in Babylonia can be explained with the Nieboer-Domar hy- pothesis, which proposes that large-scale systems of bondage will arise in regions with * This was written in honor, thanks, and recognition of McGuire Gibson’s efforts to impart a sense of the influence of aggregate population behavior on Mesopotamian development, notably in his 1973 article “Population Shift and the Rise of Mesopotamian Civilization”. As an Assyriology student who was searching texts for answers to similar questions, I have occasionally found myself in uncharted waters. Mac’s encouragement helped me get past my discomfort, find the data, and put words on the page. The necessity of assembling Mesopotamian “demographic” measures was something made clear to me by the M.A.S.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibilities of Restoring the Iraqi Marshes Known As the Garden of Eden
    Water and Climate Change in the MENA-Region Adaptation, Mitigation,and Best Practices International Conference April 28-29, 2011 in Berlin, Germany POSSIBILITIES OF RESTORING THE IRAQI MARSHES KNOWN AS THE GARDEN OF EDEN N. Al-Ansari and S. Knutsson Dept. Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, Lulea University, Sweden Abstract The Iraqi marsh lands, which are known as the Garden of Eden, cover an area about 15000- 20000 sq. km in the lower part of the Mesopotamian basin where the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers flow. The marshes lie on a gently sloping plan which causes the two rivers to meander and split in branches forming the marshes and lakes. The marshes had developed after series of transgression and regression of the Gulf sea water. The marshes lie on the thick fluvial sediments carried by the rivers in the area. The area had played a prominent part in the history of man kind and was inhabited since the dawn of civilization by the Summarian more than 6000 BP. The area was considered among the largest wetlands in the world and the greatest in west Asia where it supports a diverse range of flora and fauna and human population of more than 500000 persons and is a major stopping point for migratory birds. The area was inhabited since the dawn of civilization by the Sumerians about 6000 years BP. It had been estimated that 60% of the fish consumed in Iraq comes from the marshes. In addition oil reserves had been discovered in and near the marshlands. The climate of the area is considered continental to subtropical.
    [Show full text]
  • Gog and Magog and Ethnic Difference in the Catalan Atlas (1375) Thomas Franke
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository History ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 9-12-2014 Monsters at the End of Time: Gog and Magog and Ethnic Difference in the Catalan Atlas (1375) Thomas Franke Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds Recommended Citation Franke, Thomas. "Monsters at the End of Time: Gog and Magog and Ethnic Difference in the Catalan Atlas (1375)." (2014). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds/30 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in History ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thomas Samuel Franke Candidate History Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Thesis Committee: Michael A. Ryan , Chairperson Timothy C. Graham Sarah Davis-Secord Franke i MONSTERS AT THE END OF TIME: GOG AND MAGOG AND ETHNIC DIFFERENCE IN THE CATALAN ATLAS (1375) by THOMAS FRANKE BACHELOR OF ARTS, UC IRVINE 2012 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico JULY 2014 Franke ii Abstract Franke, Thomas. Monsters at the End of Time: Gog and Magog and Ethnic Difference in the Catalan Atlas (1375). University of New Mexico, 2014. Although they are only mentioned briefly in Revelation, the destructive Gog and Magog formed an important component of apocalyptic thought for medieval European Christians, who associated Gog and Magog with a number of non-Christian peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah 37 I
    ISRAEL AND EMPIRE ii ISRAEL AND EMPIRE A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism Leo G. Perdue and Warren Carter Edited by Coleman A. Baker LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY 1 Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint previously known as T&T Clark 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury, T&T Clark and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2015 © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56705-409-8 PB: 978-0-56724-328-7 ePDF: 978-0-56728-051-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) 1 Contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction: Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonial Interpretation 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limits of Middle Babylonian Archives1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenstarTs The Limits of Middle Babylonian Archives1 susanne paulus Middle Babylonian Archives Archives and archival records are one of the most important sources for the un- derstanding of the Babylonian culture.2 The definition of “archive” used for this article is the one proposed by Pedersén: «The term “archive” here, as in some other studies, refers to a collection of texts, each text documenting a message or a statement, for example, letters, legal, economic, and administrative documents. In an archive there is usually just one copy of each text, although occasionally a few copies may exist.»3 The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the archives of the Middle Babylonian Period (ca. 1500-1000 BC),4 which are often 1 All kudurrus are quoted according to Paulus 2012a. For a quick reference on the texts see the list of kudurrus in table 1. 2 For an introduction into Babylonian archives see Veenhof 1986b; for an overview of differ- ent archives of different periods see Veenhof 1986a and Brosius 2003a. 3 Pedersén 1998; problems connected to this definition are shown by Brosius 2003b, 4-13. 4 This includes the time of the Kassite dynasty (ca. 1499-1150) and the following Isin-II-pe- riod (ca. 1157-1026). All following dates are BC, the chronology follows – willingly ignoring all linked problems – Gasche et. al. 1998. the limits of middle babylonian archives 87 left out in general studies,5 highlighting changes in respect to the preceding Old Babylonian period and problems linked with the material.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo Babylonian Rule
    Neo Babylonians Rule “The Most Accomplished Empire” *Clears throat* Thank you. Thank you ever so much distinguished colleagues and professors for inviting me to speak to you today. As many of you know I'm professor Olivia Eichman of archeological studies at Stanford University. I have also worked at various dig sites in ancient sumers regions. All of these excavations lead me to countless degrees in antiquity. Enough about me already, I'm here to talk to you about about the great Mesopotamian Empires. But which empire was the greatest? Was it the Akkadians with the first empire? Or the Assyrians who reigned the longest? Neither of these empires strike me as the most accomplished. The Neo Babylonian’s Empire was the most accomplished empire by far and when you leave this room today I guarantee you will think as highly of them as I do too. Why do I think that the Neo Babylonians are the most accomplished? For starters, their ruler knew how to keep his empire safe. He had many safety precautions. One way Nebuchadrezzar II insured safety among his people was by surrounding their city in a wall so great in size two chariots could ride on it side by side. But that isn't all. No. Nebuchadnezzar II built another wall inside of the other wall for added protection. Both walls were named after Mesopotamian gods and goddesses. One of the gates that was built was called Ishtar gate, named after the goddess of war and love. To top it all off the walls were surrounded by a moat.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulug-Depe and the Transition Period from Bronze Age to Iron Age in Central Asia
    Ulug-depe and the transition period from Bronze Age to Iron Age in Central Asia. A tribute to V.I. Sarianidi Johanna Lhuillier To cite this version: Johanna Lhuillier. Ulug-depe and the transition period from Bronze Age to Iron Age in Central Asia. A tribute to V.I. Sarianidi . Dubova, N.A., Antonova, E.V., Kozhin, P.M., Kosarev, M.F., Muradov, R.G., Sataev, R.M. & Tishkin A.A. Transactions of Margiana Archaeological Expedition, To the memory of Professor Viktor Sarianidi, 6, Staryj Sad, pp.509-521, 2016, 978-5-89930-150-6. halshs-01534928 HAL Id: halshs-01534928 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01534928 Submitted on 8 Jun 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. N.N. MIKLUKHO-MAKLAY INSTITUTE OF ETHNOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY OF RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXPEDITION ALTAY STATE UNIVERSITY TRANSACTIONS OF MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXPEDITION Volume 6 To the Memory of Professor Victor Sarianidi Editorial board N.A. Dubova (editor in chief), E.V. Antonova, P.M. Kozhin, M.F. Kosarev, R.G. Muradov, R.M. Sataev, A.A. Tishkin Moscow 2016 Туркменистан, Гонур-депе, 9 октября 2005 г.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Record of Eriocheir Sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Varunidae) from the Basrah Area of Southern Iraq
    Aquatic Invasions (2006) Volume 1, Issue 2: 51-54 DOI 10.3391/ai.2006.1.2.1 © 2006 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2006 REABIC (http://www.reabic.net) This is an Open Access article Research article The first record of Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Varunidae) from the Basrah Area of Southern Iraq Paul F. Clark1, Ibtsam M. Abdul-Sahib2 and Muhamed S. Al-Asadi2 1Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Marine Science Centre, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq E-mails: [email protected] ; [email protected] Received 26 February 2006; accepted in revised form 26 April 2006 Abstract The capture of Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853, the Chinese mitten crab is reported for the first time from Southern Iraq, in the Shatt Al Basrah Canal, 20 June 2005, south of the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers (Iraq, Syria and Turkey) and west of the Karun River (Iran). Key words: Eriocheir sinensis, Shatt Al- Basrah Canal, Iraq Introduction records of Eriocheir sinensis were first reported from Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, Recently Robbins et al. (2006) reported the first Sweden and Finland by Boettger (1934), Chinese mitten crab from Central Asia. The Linnaniemi (1933) and Panning (1938). specimen was a male collected from the River The purpose of this paper is to record a second Tazeh Bekandeh, 37º26’54"N. 49º25’07"E., less mitten crab from Central Asia that was captured than 6 km from Caspian Sea, 5.20 km from ca.
    [Show full text]
  • X the Late Bronze Age Ceramic Traditions of the Syrian Jazirah
    Originalveröffentlichung in: al-Maqdissī – Valérie Matoïan – Christophe Nicolle (Hg.), Céramique de l'âge du bronze en Syrie, II, L'Euphrate et la région de Jézireh (Bibliothèque archéologique et historique 180), Beyrouth 2007, S. 231-291 X The Late Bronze Age Ceramic Traditions of the Syrian Jazirah Peter Pfalzner THE PERIODIZATION SYSTEM AND THE QUESTION clearly circumscribed factors in the history and chronology OF CHRONOLOGICAL TERMINOLOGY of the Syrian Jazirah. Furthermore, through their specific political and economical organization they considerably The second half of the 2nd mill, BC in Syria has been influenced the material culture of the Syrian Jazirah. As chronologically labeled either in terms of the system of a consequence, both periods reveal a distinct ceramic "metal epochs" as the Late Bronze Age I and II or else repertoire. These two archaeological phases and ceramic labeled according to a culturally and geographically traditions can thus be labeled "Mittani" and "Middle oriented terminology as the "Middle-Syrian"' period Assyrian". (ca 1600/1530-1200/1100 BC). With regard to the strong In order to avoid misconceptions of these terms, it is geographical differentiation of material culture, especially important to note that the terms "Mittani" and "Middle pottery, within Syria to be observed in many periods, it is Assyrian ceramic period" do not imply an ethnic assignment advisable to introduce a chronological periodization on a of the pottery concerned. They have a purely political- regional scale. For the Syrian Jazirah, a region with very geographical significance. This is to say that any of the distinct ceramic repertoires through all phases from the Late Bronze Age Jazirah population groups - for example Early Bronze to the Iron Age, the "Jazirah chronological 3 Hurrians , Assyrians, Aramaeans, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms
    McDONALD INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms Edited by Norman Yoffee The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms McDONALD INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms Edited by Norman Yoffee with contributions from Tom D. Dillehay, Li Min, Patricia A. McAnany, Ellen Morris, Timothy R. Pauketat, Cameron A. Petrie, Peter Robertshaw, Andrea Seri, Miriam T. Stark, Steven A. Wernke & Norman Yoffee Published by: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge, UK CB2 3ER (0)(1223) 339327 [email protected] www.mcdonald.cam.ac.uk McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2019 © 2019 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 (International) Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ISBN: 978-1-902937-88-5 Cover design by Dora Kemp and Ben Plumridge. Typesetting and layout by Ben Plumridge. Cover image: Ta Prohm temple, Angkor. Photo: Dr Charlotte Minh Ha Pham. Used by permission. Edited for the Institute by James Barrett (Series Editor). Contents Contributors vii Figures viii Tables ix Acknowledgements x Chapter 1 Introducing the Conference: There Are No Innocent Terms 1 Norman Yoffee Mapping the chapters 3 The challenges of fragility 6 Chapter 2 Fragility of Vulnerable Social Institutions in Andean States 9 Tom D. Dillehay & Steven A. Wernke Vulnerability and the fragile state
    [Show full text]