DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Use Geology of Central Jackson County, Oregon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BULLETIN 94 LAND UsE GEOLOGY of CENTRAL JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON 1977 � cw--o.._ON- ...... o•PARTM-T � ANIJ" .....AL IN..,.R(•• Q .. RA�H MMIDN. -A'Ta s. ·�lb' STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES 1069 State Office Building, Portland, Oregon 97201 Bu lletin 94 LAND USE GEOLOGY OF CENTRAL JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON John D. Beaulieu Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries and Paul W. Hughes, Consulting Geologist Conducted in compliance with ORS 516.030 Funded in port with a grant from the Land Conservation and Development Commission to Jackson County GOVERNING BOARD STATE GEOLOGIST Leeanne MacColl Portland Ra I ph S. Mason Robert W. Doty Talent 1977 John L. Schwabe Portland CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Purpose ---------- 1 Acknowledgments - - - 1 How to Use - 1 General - - -· - ----- 1 Site evaluations ---- 2 Land use capability ana lyses - 2 Extrapolation of data 2 Policy formu loti on - - -- 2 Map Scale and Detai I - - --- - 2 GEOGRAPHY ---- 5. Location and Extent - 5 Climate ---- 5 Topography --------- 5 Popu lotion and Land Use ------- 6 GEOLOGIC UNITS 7 Genera I -- - -- 7 Surficial Geologic Units - --- --- 7 Quaternary alluvium ------ 7 Quaternary older alluvium ----- - ---- 7 Quaternary bench grave I -- --- 8 Quaternary alluvial fan deposits - - - -- 10 Volcanic and Sedimentary Geologic Units --- 10 Pliocene basalt - ---- -- - 10 Eocene and Oligocene volcanic rock --- 10 Eocene and 0 ligocene tuffaceous rock - - - - - - - 12 Eocene sedimentary rock - - - ---- 13 Cretaceous sedimentary rock - --- 14 Galice Formation - - -- - - -- - -- 14 Metamorphic Geologic Units - - - - - 14 Volcanic rocks of the Applegate Formation - - - - - - 15 Sedimentary rocks of the Applegate Formation - - --- 15 May Creek Schist ----- ------ 16 Intrusive Geologic Units ---------- 16 Diorite and granodiorite ----------- 16 Gabbro ----- ----- 17 Serpentinite ---- 17 Tertiary intrusive rock - - 17 Bedrock Structure 17 Regional setting --- 17 Loco I structure - 18 ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF GEOLOGIC UNITS - 20 Genera I ------- 20 Physical Properties - 20 Hardness 20 Joint development 20 Bedding distinctness --- 22 Foundation strength - - - 22 iii Excavation difficulty 22 Cutbank stability 24 Slope intensity ----- 24 Infi ltration rote - 25 Landfi II potentia I --- 25 Septic-tank capacity of soils - - 25 Regolith 26 Thickness on steep slopes - 26 Thickness on gentle slopes - - - 27 Clay content --- 27 Si It content - 27 Expansion-contraction 28 Drainage - 28 Over land flow - 28 Sha I low subsurface flow 28 Deep subsurface flow 29 Soils 29 Purpose - 29 General - 29 Systems of soils classification - 30 Distribution ----- 30 MINERAL RESOURCES - 38 General 38 Aggregate ­ 38 General 38 Sources 38 Recommendations --- 39 Metallic and Nonmetallic - 42 General --- 42 Reserves -- 42 Recommendations 43 Ground Water 43 General -- 43 Geologic units ---- 46 Surficial geologic units 46 Metamorphic rock units 46 Volcanic rocks -- 46 Sedimentary rocks 46 Intrusive rocks 49 Recommendations 49 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 50 General 50 Mass Movement 50 General - 50 Causes 50 Downslope gravity component - 50 Shear resistance - - - - 50 Distribution -- 51 Impacts ---- 51 Areas of special concern 54 Recommendations 54 Slope Erosion - 56 General --- 56 iv Methods of ·study - 56 Impacts - 57 Areas of specia I concern - 57 Recommendations - 57 High Ground Water and Pending - 58 General 58 Causes - 58 Distribution 58 Impacts - 59 Recommendations - 59 Stream Flooding 60 General 60 Causes - 61 Distribution 62 Impacts - 62 Recommendations - 64 Stream Erosion and Deposition 64 General 64 Distribution 68 Torrentia 1-flood channe Is - 68 Low land-flood channe Is 68 Recommendations - 69 Earthquakes - 73 General 73 Earthquake potentia I - 73 Impacts - 75 Recommendations - 75 Bl BLIOGRAPHY 77 GLOSSARY 83 ILLUSTRATIONS Figures 1. Suggested use of this bulletin in land use decision making - 3 2. Index map of study area showing quodrong le map coverage 4 3. Time distribution of geologic units 8 4. Quaternary older alluvium (Qoa) along Anderson Creek 9 5. Patterned ground overlying Quaternary bench gravel {Qbg) 11 6. Pliocene basalt {Tpb) overlying moderate ly steep slopes of Eocene sedi men tory rock (T es) - 11 7. Southern Bear Creek va I ley - -- - 12 8. Resistant cliffs of Eocene sedimentary rock {Tes) in southeast Bear Creek valley 13 9. Metamorphosed volcanic rock of the Applegate Formation {"Rav) along the Applegate River 15 10. Regional geology of southwestern Oregon 18 11. Blocky, moderately spaced joints in granodiorite {KJd) --- 23 12. Distinct bedding in Eocene sedimentary rock {Tes) of southern Bear Creek valley 23 13. Thick silty and sandy regolith in deeply weathered granodiorite (KJd) near Ashland 26 14. Guide for the textural classification of soi ls 31 15. Rubbly Eocene and Oligocene volcanic rock {Teov) near Brownsboro ­ 39 16. Land-management analysis in areas of critical moss-movement terrain 55 17. Rogue River at Shady Cove during 1964 flood 65 18. Brownsboro after 1964 flood 65 19. Gold Ray {Roy Gold) bridge during 1964 flood - 66 20. Bear Creek in Medford during 1964 flood 66 21 . Alder Park Estates dow nstream from Gold Ray {Ray Gold) along the Rogue River during 1964 flood - -- 67 22. Rogue River near community of Rogue River during 1964 flood 67 23. Stream-bank erosion with characteristic bar formation ---- 69 24. Stream-bank erosion caused by 1964 flood 70 25. Road washed out by 1964 flood 70 26. Mountain road washed out by 1964 flood 71 27. Damage caused by 1964 flood to north approach of Bybee bridge -- 71 28. Damage to residence along Butte Creek in Lake Creek district during 1964 flood 72 29. Erosion and deposi tion caused by 1964 flood in Lake Creek district - - 72 Tab les 1. Climatic data, Jackson County, Oregon - 5 2. Populations of major communities of centra I Jackson County, Oregon 6 3. Engineering properties of geologic units, centra I Jackson County, Oregon 21 Unified Soil Classification System 32 5.4. American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO) Soi ls Classification 33 6. Comparison of three systems of partic le-size classification 34 7. Bed rock and soi I associations of centro I Jackson County, Oregon 8. Aggregate potential of geologic units, central Jockson County, Oregon 36 9. Metallic and nonmetallic mineral resources of central Jackson County, Oregon 40 10. Representative water we lis for centro I Jackson County, Oregon - . 4744 11. Mass movement in central Jackson County, Oregon 52 12. Slide potential of geologic units ---------- 53 13. Flood discharge and frequency data, Rogue River, Applegate River, and Bear Creek 63 14. Seale of earthquake intensities and magnitudes - --- 74 15. Earthquakes felt in Jackson County, Oregon 76 VI Maps in envelope Geologic map of the following quadrangle: Medford Geologic maps of parts of the following quadrangles: Ash land and Lake Creek Gold Hi II Ruch and Wimer Trai I and Talent Geologic hazards map of the following quadrangle: Medford Geologic hazards maps of parts of the following quadrangles: Ash land and Lake Creek Gold Hi II Ruch and Wimer TraiI and Talent LAND USE GEOLOGY OF CENTRAL JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON INTRODUCTION Pu rpose Effective land use planning and land management require on adequate data base with regard to the potential uses and limitations of the land. The purpose of this study is to provide practical information on specified geologic hazards and engineering geology conditions of central Jackson County. The need for comprehensive, systematic, and reliable information of this sort has gained wide recogni­ tion by State officials, County officials, planners, private citizens, and resource specialists and is articu­ lated in Goal 7 of the Land Conservation and Development Commission. Legal trends in recent years have been toward placing increasing emphasis on comprehensive plans in land use decisions in Oregon (Fasano; Baker v. Milwaukee; Green v. Hayward). The nationwide trend is also toward the placing of greater responsibilities on permit-granting agencies. Ac know I edg men ts The author greatly appreciates the cooperation and help given by many individuals and organiza­ tions in the preparation of this report. The investigation was funded in parts by grants from the Land Conservation and Development Commission to Jackson County and also o grant from Jackson County. The grants were implemented on o matching basis by the Oregon Deportment of Geology and Mineral Industries. Special thanks ore extended to Robert Br itzemon, Jackson County Planning Director, and Curtis D. Weaver, Senior Planner. The Jackson County Planning Department, the U. S. Geological Survey (Port land office), the U. S. Soil Conservation Service, and the Oregon Water Resources Deportment supplied valuable information in their respective areas. Staff members of the Oregon Deportment of Geology and Mineral Industries assisting in the project included Steven R. Renaud, Charles A. Schumacher, Wendy John, and Rose Reed, cartographers; Beverly F. Yogi, geologist-editor; Ainslie Bricker, editor; and Ruth E. Pavlot, typist. How to Us e General Proper land management and land use planning addresses the characteristics of the land. In addition to County and city planners, the category of land use planners and managers to some degree also includes developers; pol icy formulators on the not ionol, state, and local I eve I; land holders; architects; engineers; and natural resource specialists. This bulletin provides planners in Jackson County with o synthesis of present thinking on geologic hazards and
Recommended publications
  • December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396)

    December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396)

    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 33 (2003) Repository 12-20-2003 December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396)" (2003). Volume 33 (2003). 51. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003/51 This December is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 33 (2003) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 33 Number 51 Saturday, December 20, 2003 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 6197—6396 Agencies in this issue: The Governor The Courts Department of Aging Department of Agriculture Department of Banking Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Revenue Fish and Boat Commission Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Public School Employees’ Retirement Board State Board of Education State Board of Nursing State Employee’s Retirement Board State Police Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 349, December 2003 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents).
  • Rogue River Watershed Council Bear Creek Working Group Monday, August 10, 2015 8:30 Am - 10:30 Am Conference Room 151, Lausmann Annex, City of Medford

    Rogue River Watershed Council Bear Creek Working Group Monday, August 10, 2015 8:30 Am - 10:30 Am Conference Room 151, Lausmann Annex, City of Medford

    Rogue River Watershed Council Bear Creek Working Group Monday, August 10, 2015 8:30 am - 10:30 am Conference Room 151, Lausmann Annex, City of Medford MEETING MINUTES In attendance: Steve Mason, John Ward, Robert Coffan, Lori Tella, Natasche O’Brien Legg, Bob Jones, Ray Tharp, Eric Dittmer, Louise Shawkat, Ed Olson, Shane Jimerfield, Amie Martin Call to order: 8:40am by Working Group Chair, Steve Mason Rogue River Watershed Council Update Two new program managers have been hired: Donna Chickering and Sarah Sauter. Brian Barr has been busy out at Wimer and Fielder dams on Evans Creek. Removal of Wimer dam was completed and crews mobilized to Fielder dam downstream. Low flows in Evans Creek caused turbidity issues during the removal. The dams should be completely out by the end of August. Proposal from Lori Tella and Jennie Morgan As part of the merger, most of Bear Creek Watershed Council’s unrestricted funds moved into a “dedicated” fund, which restricts that money for use in the Bear Creek watershed. Bear Creek Watershed Education Partners (BCWEP) has historically run the Kids and Creeks event, with the Bear Creek Watershed Council as the major partner. The events offers an opportunity for people to learn about the Bear Creek watershed, contributing factors to water pollution, and see spawning salmon. The Rogue River Watershed Council (RRWC) would like to see the event continue, but BCWEP lost its funding for this year, so the RRWC would have to take the lead. Requested from the working group is approval to use a small portion of Bear Creek dedicated funds to help support the event.
  • Ashland Ranger District Rogue River National Forest APPENDICES

    Ashland Ranger District Rogue River National Forest APPENDICES

    'L-JCUMENU A 13.66/2: B 42x/APP./c.4 I V 0) C) oa)4e EN D\ Ashland Ranger District Rogue River National Forest APPENDICES APPENDIX A: KEY ISSUES & KEY QUESTIONS APPENDIX B: FIRE Identification of Specific Vegetation Zones for the Bear Watershed Analysis Area Fire Behavior Fuel Model Key Fuel Model Assignments Chronology of Events APPENDIX C: GEOLOGY, GEOMORPHOLOGY & SOILS Geology and Geomorphology of the Bear Watershed Analysis Area Characteristics of Soil Productivity APPENDIX D: HYDROLOGY What Sort of Debris is Transported Stream Classification Bibliography of Water Quality Studies Map: Drainageways Crossed Map: Dominant Precipitation Patterns APPENDIX E: FISHERIES Historic and Current Miles of Fish Habitat River Mile Index APPENDIX F: AQUATIC AND RIPARIAN HABITAT Habitat Comparison Chart Relative Comparison of Stream Gradients With Coarse Woody Debris Historic and Current Conditions for Aquatic Processes and Functions Maps: Reach Breaks of Neil Creek, West Fork & East Forks of Ashland Creek Table: Processes & Human Influences on Aquatic and Riparian Ecosystems Map: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Surveyed Wetlands Map: Supplemental Water Distribution System Broad Level Delineation of Major Stream Types (Rosgen) Delineative Criteria for Major Stream Types (Rosgen) APPENDIX G: HERITAGE RESOURCES Cultural Uses in the Bear Watershed Analysis Area Chronology of Important Dates APPENDIX A I KEY ISSUES & KEY QUESTIONS Key Questions IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER: These questions drive the analysis for Chapter II: Historic and Current Conditions and Future Trends. CLIMATE Identification of the atmospheric/climate regimes under which the ecosystem of the Bear Watershed Analysis Area have developed is important to this analysis. Attributes to be discussed in this analysis include periods of flood and drought, storm patterns in the winter and summer, occurrence of severe lightning and wind storms, rain on snow events, etc.
  • Types of Landslides.Indd

    Types of Landslides.Indd

    Landslide Types and Processes andslides in the United States occur in all 50 States. The primary regions of landslide occurrence and potential are the coastal and mountainous areas of California, Oregon, Land Washington, the States comprising the intermountain west, and the mountainous and hilly regions of the Eastern United States. Alaska and Hawaii also experience all types of landslides. Landslides in the United States cause approximately $3.5 billion (year 2001 dollars) in dam- age, and kill between 25 and 50 people annually. Casualties in the United States are primar- ily caused by rockfalls, rock slides, and debris flows. Worldwide, landslides occur and cause thousands of casualties and billions in monetary losses annually. The information in this publication provides an introductory primer on understanding basic scientific facts about landslides—the different types of landslides, how they are initiated, and some basic information about how they can begin to be managed as a hazard. TYPES OF LANDSLIDES porate additional variables, such as the rate of movement and the water, air, or ice content of The term “landslide” describes a wide variety the landslide material. of processes that result in the downward and outward movement of slope-forming materials Although landslides are primarily associ- including rock, soil, artificial fill, or a com- ated with mountainous regions, they can bination of these. The materials may move also occur in areas of generally low relief. In by falling, toppling, sliding, spreading, or low-relief areas, landslides occur as cut-and- La Conchita, coastal area of southern Califor- flowing. Figure 1 shows a graphic illustration fill failures (roadway and building excava- nia.
  • Water Management and Conservation Plan March 2009

    Water Management and Conservation Plan March 2009

    Water Management and Conservation Plan March 2009 Water Management and Conservation Plan March 2009 CVO\082060036 Contents Section Page 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1-1 Overview.....................................................................................................................1-1 Plan Organization ......................................................................................................1-3 Affected Local Governments....................................................................................1-3 Plan Update Schedule ...............................................................................................1-4 2 Water Supplier Description .............................................................................................2-1 Source ..........................................................................................................................2-1 Interconnections with Other Systems .....................................................................2-1 Intergovernmental Agreements...............................................................................2-2 Service Area Description...........................................................................................2-2 System Description ....................................................................................................2-5 Records of Water Use ................................................................................................2-8
  • South Fork Coquille Watershed Analysis

    South Fork Coquille Watershed Analysis

    DOCUMENT A 13.66/2: COQUILLE fiVE, LOWER S.F. 17 10 03 00* I C 66x 1 COQUILLE RIVER, UPPER S.F 17 1:-03 01* ' United States Q, '0) Departimnt of Agriculture THIS PUBLICATION Forest Serilce CMN FE CHECKED OUT Pacific Northwest Region 1995 JA* fSouth Fork Coquille Wate1hed Analysis Iteration 1.0 Powers Ranger Distric, Slsklyou National Forest September 1995 SOUTHERN OREGON UNWVERSiTY LIBRARY ASHLAND, OREGON 97520 United Stat. Depaenent of Agnculure Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region 1995 SOUTH FORK COQUILLE WATERSHED ANALYSIS ITERATION 1.0 I have read this analysis and it meets the Standards and Guidelines for watershed analysis required by an amendment to the Forest Plan (Record of Decision dated April 1994). Any additional evidence needed to make a decision will be gathered site-specifically as part of a NEPA document or as an update to this document. SIGNED CoQ 4 DATE q 1T2 letE District Ranger Powers Ranger District Siskiyou National Forest South Fork Coquille Watershed Analysis - September 1995 Developed by Interdisciplinary Team Members: Steve Harbert Team leader Betsy Howell Wildlife Biologist Dave Shea Botantist, Wildlife Biologist Ruth Sisko Forester Cindy Ricks Geologist Chris Parks Hydrologist Max Yager Fish Biologist Kathy Helm Writer-Editor (March-April 1995), BLM Tina Harbert Writer-Editor (May-July 1995), Powers R.D. Joe Hallett Cultural Resource Key Support: Joel King Forest Planner, Siskiyou National Forest Sue Olson Acting District Ranger, Powers R.D. (Jan-May 1995) Carl Linderman District Ranger, Powers R.D. Marshall Foster GIS, Powers R.D. Jodi Shorb Computer Assistant Linda Spencer Computer Support For Further Information, contact: Powers Ranger District Powers, OR 97466 (503) 439-3011 The policy of the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, religion, sex, or disability, familial status, or political affiliation.
  • Upper Rogue Watershed Assessment

    Upper Rogue Watershed Assessment

    Upper Rogue Watershed Assessment Chapter 1 Introduction and Watershed Overview TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND WATERSHED OVERVIEW...................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 The Players .....................................................................................................................1 1.3 Approach.........................................................................................................................2 1.4 Historical Background ...................................................................................................3 1.5 General Overview ...........................................................................................................5 1.5.1 Trail Creek Subwatershed .....................................................................................6 1.5.2 Elk Creek Subwatershed .......................................................................................7 1.5.3 Upper Rogue River Subwatershed........................................................................9 1.5.4 South Fork Rogue River Subwatershed..............................................................11 1.5.5 Big Butte Creek Subwatershed ...........................................................................12 1.5.6 Lost Creek Lake Subwatershed ..........................................................................14 1.5.7 Shady Cove
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021

    Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021

    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
  • Engineering Geologic Assessment of the Slope Movements And

    Engineering Geologic Assessment of the Slope Movements And

    EGU Journal Logos (RGB) Open Access Open Access Open Access Advances in Annales Nonlinear Processes Geosciences Geophysicae in Geophysics Open Access Open Access Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1113–1126, 2013 Natural Hazards Natural Hazards www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1113/2013/ doi:10.5194/nhess-13-1113-2013 and Earth System and Earth System © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Sciences Sciences Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric Chemistry Chemistry and Physics and Physics Engineering geologic assessment of the slope movements and Discussions Open Access Open Access liquefaction failures of the 23 October 2011 Van earthquakeAtmospheric Atmospheric Measurement Measurement M = ( w 7.2) Techniques Techniques A. Karakas¸, O.¨ Coruk, and B. Dogan˘ Discussions Open Access Open Access Kocaeli University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Geological Engineering, Izmit,˙ Kocaeli, Turkey Biogeosciences Correspondence to: A. Karakas¸([email protected]) Biogeosciences Discussions Received: 30 October 2012 – Published in Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: – Revised: 29 January 2013 – Accepted: 18 April 2013 – Published: 26 April 2013 Open Access Open Access Climate Climate Abstract. On 23 October 2011, a M = 7.2 earthquake oc- 1 Introduction w of the Past of the Past curred in the Van Province in eastern Turkey, killing 604 peo- Discussions ple. The earthquake was triggered by a thrust fault due to a Earthquakes are natural events that have different effects on compression stress in the region, and caused extensive dam- the earth. Some effects severely affect humans, man-made Open Access Open Access age over a large area. Many structures in the earthquake re- structures, and nature.
  • Mass Movements General Anatomy

    Mass Movements General Anatomy

    CE/SC 10110-20110: Planet Earth Mass Movements Earth Portrait of a Planet Fifth Edition Chapter 16 Mass movement (or mass wasting) is the downslope motion of rock, regolith (soil, sediment, and debris), snow, and ice. General Anatomy Discrete slump blocks Head scarp Bulging toe Road for scale Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 Fractures rock, loosens soil particles. Seismic energy overstresses the system. Yungay, Peru, in the Santa River Valley beneath the heavily glaciated Nevado Huascarán (21,860 feet). May, 1970, earthquake occurred offshore ~100 km away - triggered many small rock falls. An 800-meter-wide block of ice was dislodged and avalanched downhill, scooping out small lakes and breaking off large masses of rock debris. Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 More than 50 million cubic meters of muddy debris traveled 3.7 km (12,000 feet) vertically and 14.5 km (9 miles) horizontally in less than 4 minutes! Main mass of material traveled down a steep valley, blocking the Santa River and burying ~18,000 people in Ranrachirca. A small part shot up the valley wall, was momentarily airborne before burying the village of Yungay. Estimated death toll = 17,000. Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 Before After Whats Left of Yungay. Common Mass Movements Rockfalls and Slides Slow Fast Debris Flows Slumping Lahars and Mudflows Solifluction and Creep These different kinds of mass movements are arranged from slowest (left) to fastest (right). Types of Mass Movement Different types of mass movement based on 4 factors: 1) Type of material involved (rock, regolith, snow, ice); 2) Velocity of the movement (slow, intermediate, fast); 3) Character of the movement (chaotic cloud, slurry, coherent mass; 4) Environment (subaerial, submarine).
  • PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Volume 29 Number 35 Saturday, August 28, 1999 • Harrisburg, Pa

    PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Volume 29 Number 35 Saturday, August 28, 1999 • Harrisburg, Pa

    PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Volume 29 Number 35 Saturday, August 28, 1999 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 4525—4668 See Part II page 4661 for the Part I Environmental Quality Board’s Agencies in this issue: Solvent Cleaning Operations The Courts Department of Banking Department of Community and Economic Development Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Transportation Environmental Hearing Board Environmental Quality Board Fish and Boat Commission Game Commission Health Care Cost Containment Council Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Liquor Control Board Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Public School Employes’ Retirement Board State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers and Salespersons Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 297, August 1999 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents). Subscription rate $82.00 per year, postpaid to points in the United States. Individual copies $2.50. Checks for subscriptions and individual copies should be made payable to ‘‘Fry Communications, Inc.’’ Postmaster send address changes to: Periodicals postage paid at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Orders for subscriptions and other circulation matters FRY COMMUNICATIONS should be sent to: Attn: Pennsylvania Bulletin 800 W. Church Rd. Fry Communications, Inc.
  • OREGON (L/)Hat I/ No One Rcmcmbcrcrl, , , the Heritage Circle Will Ensure They Do

    OREGON (L/)Hat I/ No One Rcmcmbcrcrl, , , the Heritage Circle Will Ensure They Do

    OREGON (l/)hat i/ no one rcmcmbcrcrl, , , The Heritage Circle will ensure they do. elp keep history alive by becoming a member of the Heritage Circle. Make a tax-advantaged bequest to the Southern Oregon Historical Society Foundation. To include the Society Foundation in your will, consult your attorney or financial advisor. The description of our organization is: The Southern Oregon Historical Society Foundation, which is an Oregon non-profit tax-exempt corporation located in Jackson County, Oregon. For information on how to become a member of the Heritage Circle please contact Executive Director Brad Linder, (541) 773-6536. tf~~ SOUTHERN 1111 OREGON 1111 HISTORY 1111 CENTER Southern Oregon Historical Society Foundation • 106 N. Central, Medford, OR 97501 Vo1.4, No.I • The Magazine of the Southern Oregon Historical Society • 1998 FEATURES "The Sanctuary Still Sings" 4 by john Howard Pofahl A History of Ashland's Old Pink Church "Restoring Tradition: Hannah Pottery 1 Q Returns to the Rogue Valley" by Shawn Davis "A Mountain Spring in Every Home" by William Alley 14 Cover photo: Colorized photo of Hodges Family out for a fall day of sport. Gold Hill. Circa 1915. See Snapshots p. 34 "Sister Harriet" for more. compiled by J. Richard Collins 16 The Life of Missionary Harriet Diantha Baldwin Cooley "Horace Bromley and the 2 6 DEPARTMENTS Copco Current Events Newsreels" by William Alley 32 COLLECTIONS HIGHLIGHTS WWI Remembered Horace Bromley, Copco's cameraman, got his start in Marketing at Kentner's department store, 34 SNAPSHOTS The Sporting Life 36 FROM THE ARCHIVES Mining Map 38 NEWS AND NOTES Society Facts and Fun 39 IN CLOSING Notes from the Editor Southern Oregon Historical Society Administrative Staff Staff: ogmphers.